Monday, September 3, 2012


Joe Arpaio - Sheriff
Obama’s Justice Department was investigating Sheriff Joe Arpaio obviously to intimate him and the Cold Case Posse. I have learned that Obama has suspended that Arpaio investigation. Now why do you think Obama would abandon an investigation of Arpaio? Could it be because facts that Obama does not want in the public during an election year would occur?

Check out this story by Drew Zahn.

JRH 9/3/12

Hunt for truth continues, even if media ignore evidence

September 2, 2012

The Obama administration may have dropped a legal case against Arizona’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, but that doesn’t mean “America’s toughest sheriff” has any intention of dropping his pursuit of the truth about the sitting president.

“We’re continuing it,” Arpaio told WND senior staff reporter and radio host Aaron Klein, of his office’s investigation into the document the White House released as Obama’s purported birth certificate. “We haven’t given up on it.”

Arpaio appeared on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio to talk about the Department of Justice’s recent decision to close a criminal probe against the sheriff, when the host asked about Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.

“We’re continuing it,” Arpaio told Klein. “It’s not whether [Obama] was born here; we’re looking at fraudulent government documents. That’s been my mission from Day 1, to see if those birth certificates are false.

“We haven’t given up on it,” he continued. “We’ll see what happens.”

When Klein asked the sheriff if he thought the birth certificate would be a significant issue in the election, however, Arpaio speculated it would continue to be swept under the rug.

“I don’t think so,” Arpaio answered, “because everybody’s ignoring it on both sides of the fence. … Even the media ignores the evidence we have. But we did our job, I was asked to do it, we used our volunteer posse at no cost to the government. We did a great investigation; we’re still coming up with information, so we’ll see what happens.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office announced last week that it has closed a criminal probe, without filing charges, of Arpaio’s office after an investigation began in 2010 of alleged financial improprieties by the sheriff and his deputies.

A separate federal investigation into Arpaio’s office regarding alleged civil rights abuses is still ongoing.

Nonetheless, Arpaio told Klein he was relieved to hear the U.S. Attorney’s news: “My office has been vindicated.”

Audio of the interview with Klein can be heard below:

[SlantRight Editor: I could not get the audio to work on my browser.]

In a separate interview with Arpaio, conducted at the recent Republican National Convention, Arpaio similarly told AM TV he was continuing the investigation into Obama’s documents.

“I’m still working on it,” he told the interviewer. “You think I’m giving up?”

Video of the interview can be seen below:

© Copyright 1997-2012 All Rights Reserved. Inc.


  1. First, Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country and there is no proof that Obama’s mother traveled while pregnant in 1961 (which at the time would have been extremely rare, and since it has been proven by WND that Obama’s father was in Hawaii on August 4 1961, she would have had to have traveled alone, which would have been even more rare for such a trip during pregnancy

    Then, there is a birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii, which has been confirmed by officials of both parties, also confirmed by the Index Data (a public file showing the birth certificates registered by year, showing one for Obama under 1961) and also confirmed by the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers).

    And only birther "experts"---who have not shown that they are really experts, and who have certainly not shown that they are fair and impartial---have claimed that there is something wrong with Obama's birth certificate. That is why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review do not believe them. And the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona recently asked Hawaii to confirm the facts on Obama's birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona ruled that that was evidence and that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.

  2. Actually the experts you ridiculed had stellar reputations until their conclusions that BHO's birth certificate had flaws suggesting there was a bit of forgery involved.

    It is a mystery that the "CONSERVATIVE" Arizona Sec. of State takes the word of any Left Wing bureaucrat from Hawaii.

    Coulter and Beck do not want to feel the weight of the power of the Prez of the USA and Establishment Republicans (that could care less if BHO forged his birth certificate). Both Coulter and Beck take risks that already make them targets for the Left. If Establishment GOP power brokers holler foul it would be a bad career move. I respect the NRO but they do choose to err on the side of paleoconservatism which means keep their nose out of what might be considered fringe Conservatism.

  3. Re: "stellar reputations."

    WND quoted about six "experts." Of them, one claimed to have discovered the original altar of Abraham and another insisted that Obama never went to Columbia College despite Columbia University saying that Obama did indeed go there and in fact that he graduated.

    So, some of the "experts" are either biased or flakey. The others certainly have not shown in any way that they are impartial.

    These experts say that there is nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate:

    Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. … I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

    John Woodman, independent computer professional, and member of the TEA PARTY (so he is unlikely to have a pro-Obama bias) said in book and on his web site and in a series of videos that the claims of fakery that he examined were unfounded.

    Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: "All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document." (AND, btw, when Zatkovich submitted the article that WND had commissioned which contained his views that Obama's birth certificate was NOT forged, WND simply did not publish it.)

    The idea that Obama was born in some place other than Hawaii, despite the birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials and the 1961 notices in the Hawaii newspapers (which were sent to the papers by the Hawaii government and only by the Hawaii government) is laughable. That and Obama's Kenyan grandmother said in the taped interview that he was born IN HAWAII (and in another interview saying that the first that Obama's family had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter from Hawaii).

    In addition to all the above, there is a witness who recalls being told of Obama's birth (by the head of obstetrics at Kapiolani Hospital, not by the doctor who delivered him) in 1961 and WRITING HOME ABOUT IT. Why? Because her father's name was Stanley, and she wrote about a birth in Hawaii to her father who also was named Stanley.

    Oh, and the Kenyan government said that it investigated the claim that Obama was born in Kenya, and found that it was not true. Hawaii is thousands of miles from the nearest foreign country, and it was rare for women to travel late in pregnancy in those days, and yet you apparently believe that there is a chance despite the rarity of such travel and despite the birth certificate showing that Obama was born in Hawaii that there is a realistic chance that he was born in a foreign country.

  4. Quite interesting Anonymous and your facts do match; never the less BHO is holding out secrets from the public that is the public's business. Why is that? What does Obama not want voters to see?

  5. What are you referring to?

    If it is the same old birther junk about him not showing his school transcripts, school papers, college transcripts, etc.---the answer is that Mitt Romney did not show those things either.

    So what secrets are you referring to?