Saturday, August 31, 2013

Conventional Wisdom is to Stay out of Syria BUT is that the Correct Wisdom?

Kerry Declares 'Assad Used Chemical Weapons Multiple Times'
John R. Houk
© August 31, 2013

Yesterday Secretary of State John Kerry in news conference told Americans there is ample proof that al-Assad’s government used chemical weapons on civilian supporters of the Free Syrian Army in which most policy wonks believe is dominated by al Qaeda-like Islamists. That means if President Barack Hussein decides to attack in such a way that turns the Syrian civil war advantage back to the rebels then a Sunni version of Iran’s Shia crackpots will be the new government in Syria. On paper the appearance is American National Interests lose no matter who wins that civil war.


I follow the blog Freedom Rings 1776 operated by Danny Jeffrey. I have been paying close attention to his analysis that if Obama attack al-Assad’s government (See Also HERE) it will be a part of a ploy to engage the Soros Agenda to transfer the governments’ of the world into a Left Wing New World Order using Islamic radicalism as a trigger to engage a military catalyst with the Soros doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Frankly I believe Danny’s analysis is very plausible one.

On the other hand chemical weapons have been unleashed in Syria. The Obama Administration WHOM I NEVER BELIEVE claims al-Assad is the perpetrator. Again many believe the Radical Muslim Free Syrian Army is the perpetrator either in trying to turn the tide of al-Assad recent victories or as a smokescreen propaganda tool to blame Assad and entice the USA to get involved militarily.
The point is that chemical weapons were used in direct contradiction to International Convention against the use of chemical weapons in warfare. Here is a brief summary of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC):
The CWC aims to eliminate an entire category of weapons of mass destruction by prohibiting the development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, transfer or use of chemical weapons by States Parties. States Parties, in turn, must take the steps necessary to enforce that prohibition in respect of persons (natural or legal) within their jurisdiction.
All States Parties have agreed to chemically disarm by destroying any stockpiles of chemical weapons they may hold and any facilities which produced them, as well as any chemical weapons they abandoned on the territory of other States Parties in the past. States Parties have also agreed to create a verification regime for certain toxic chemicals and their precursors (listed in Schedules 1, 2 and 3 in the Annex on Chemicals to the CWC) in order to ensure that such chemicals are only used for purposes not prohibited.
A unique feature of the CWC is its incorporation of the 'challenge inspection', whereby any State Party in doubt about another State Party's compliance can request the Director-General to send an inspection team. Under the CWC's 'challenge inspection' procedure, States Parties have committed themselves to the principle of 'any time (sic), anywhere' inspections with no right of refusal.
The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction (the 'CWC', or the 'Convention') aims to eliminate an entire category of weapons of mass destruction by prohibiting the development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, transfer or use of chemical weapons by States Parties.
The States Parties to this Convention -Determined to act with a view to achieving effective progress towards general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control, including the prohibition and elimination of all types of weapons of mass destruction, -Desiring to contribute to the realization of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.. (READ ENTIRETY - Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (Chemical Weapons Convention); Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons [OPCW])
You can download the official text of the CWC HERE. You can read specifics on the CWC from the NGO Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). In full disclosure the NTI was founded by Ted Turner and (probably to add political credibility) former Senator Sam Nunn (D-GA). If you check the NTI Leadership and Staff page you will a combination of Leftists, RINOs and even some representing Islamic interests. The NTI seems to provide a decent summary which is why I point to it; however as a formulator of Think Tank policy I would be very wary of conclusions and suggestions.
At the point of my writing my thoughts the Brits have pulled out of supporting the USA in a punitive military expedition against Assad. I watch the news station that Leftists and hard core Conservatives love to hate – Fox News. This news services seems to indicate they believe Obama will do a go-it-alone strike against Syria BUT also seems to be drawing back in reticence most likely because of the Brits very public withdrawal. Also big dogs Russia and China are supportive of Assad. AND Assad has insinuated they will launch an all-out attack on the USA’s primary ally in the region – Israel. If Obama breaks his pattern of Foreign Policy weakness and launches an attack on Syria such action would follow Danny Jeffrey’s analysis of an R2P conspiracy to terminate Israel to curry favor with hate-Jews/hate-Israel Muslim Arabs. If Obama backs off the President will again show the world he is a weak-kneed global leader incapable of committing to a consistent Foreign Policy.
Contrary to many of my fellow Conservatives and Obama’s Leftist base, think militarily removing Assad has more short term positives to American National Interests than should be passed up. The Egyptian military is dropping the hammer on the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian military currently desires to keep the U.S. military flowing. If the Egyptian military maintains that hammer it is unlikely that U.S. military aid will find its way to Muslim Brotherhood revolutionary favorites such as Hamas and the Free Syrian Army to be used nefariously against Israel. A week Syrian government minus Assad messes up Iran’s connection to client terrorist organization Hezbollah in Lebanon. Sunnis hate Shias as much as both hate Jews. Perhaps a Sunni Islamist government in Syria will be a tool to diminish Hezbollah to allow the remaining Christians and Sunnis in Lebanon to take back their nation from the Shia terrorist organization. AND it would be in Israel’s National Interests to facilitate a weakening of Hezbollah as well. That is the short term potential benefits of removing Bashar al-Assad.
The problem for America and Israel is the unknowability of both nation’s long term National Interests. If a Democrat is elected to the Presidency in 2016 then Israel National Security will be in danger. If a RINO is elected in 2016 Israel’s existence won’t be as threatened but if the RINO pushes for the creation of a Palestinian that will be an existential threat to Israel. If a true Conservative is elected in 2016 America’s National Interests will be in better shape with at least a stealth weakening via Intelligence services of the weak Islamist nations and the promise of aid to the stronger Muslim nations. The use of a kind of carrot and stick balance to the region with Israel either participating in concert or exerting unilateral espionage points that the USA ignores.
There are a lot of variables involved in a decision to attack Syria or not to attack. Each variable may lead to a variety of plusses or minuses for or against the USA and Israel. Frankly those variables could may slant the wrong way if Danny Jeffrey is correct about a Soros-Obama agenda. I don’t trust Obama. Do you?
JRH 8/31/13
WATCH: Kerry Declares 'Assad Used Chemical Weapons Multiple Times'
Aug 30 2013 1:38pm
Secretary of State John Kerry delivered a statement moments ago on the chemical attack in Syria.

Kerry said that the intelligence community has “carefully reviewed and rereviewed information regarding this attack,” and that the “United States government now knows that at least 1429 Syrians were killed in this attack including at least 426 children.”
He continued, “Even the first responders - the doctors, nurses, and medics who tried to save them - they became victims themselves. We saw them gasping for air, terrified that their own lives were in danger. This indiscriminate, inconceivable horror of chemical weapons. This is what Assad did to his own people.”
“We know that the Assad regime has the largest chemical weapons program in the entire Middle East. We know that the regime has used those weapons multiple times this year […] We know that for three days before the attack, the Syrian regime’s chemical weapons personnel were on the ground in the area making preparations. And we know that the Syrian regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks and taking precautions associated with chemical weapons.”
He stressed that this “crime against humanity” could not go unpunished.

[Editor: The Fox News Insider webpage has two News coverage videos and the transcript of what would have been the third part. I found a 19 minute version of the news conference which I am posting here.]
Posted by YouHotNews
Published on Aug 30, 2013
News Conference Speech 8/30/2013
Kerry Says Assad, A 'Thug And Murderer,' Was Behind Attack
(WashingtonPost) Secretary of State John F. Kerry made a forceful case Friday for U.S. military intervention in Syria, saying that U.S. intelligence has information pinning responsibility for last week's chemical weapons attack squarely on the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

In a speech at the State Department, Kerry said that for three days before the Aug. 21 attack, the Syrian regime's chemical weapons personnel "were in the area, making preparations" for the strike. He also said that "regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks" and taking other precautions. And he said U.S. intelligence knows that the rockets containing the poison gas were launched only from "regime-controlled areas."

Two years after the first anti-government protests, conflict in Syria rages on. See the major events in the country's tumultuous uprising.

The attack killed more than 1,400 Syrians, including 426 children, Kerry said.

"The American people are tired of war," Kerry said, adding that he is also. "But fatigue does not absolve us of our responsibility." He said that "history would judge us all extraordinarily harshly" if the United States does not respond to the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government.

Kerry spoke after French President Francois Hollande said Friday that his country is prepared to act in Syria despite Britain's surprise rejection of military action, potentially making
READ THE REST at video page
[Editor: Back to Fox News Insider]
Part Three:
[fnivideo 2638886718001]
Below is an ongoing transcript of Kerry's remarks.
President Obama has spent many days now consulting with Congress and talking with leader around the world about the situation in Syria.
Last night the President asked all of us on his National Security team to consult with the leaders of Congress as well; including the leadership of the Congressional National Security committees.
And he asked us to consult about what we know regarding the horrific chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs last week.  I will tell you that as someone who has spent nearly three decades in the United States Congress, I know that that consultation is the right way for a President to approach a decision of when and how and if to use military force.
And it's important to ask the tough questions and get the tough answers before taking action, not just afterwards. And I believe, as President Obama does, that it is also important to discuss this directly with the American people.
That's our responsibility; to talk with the citizens who trusted all of us in the administration and the Congress with responsibility for their security.
That's why this morning's release of our government's unclassified estimate of what took place in Syria is so important.
Its findings are as clear as they are compelling.  I'm not asking you to take my word for it.  Read for yourself, everyone, those listening, all of you, read for yourselves the evidence from thousands of sources; evidence that is already publicly available.
And read for yourselves the verdict reached by our intelligence community about the chemical weapons attack the Assad regime inflicted on the opposition and on opposition controlled or contested neighborhoods in the Damascus suburbs on the early morning of August 21.
Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack. And I will tell you, it has done so more than mindful of the Iraq experience.
We will not repeat that moment. Accordingly, we have taken unprecedented steps to declassify and make facts available to people who can judge for themselves.
But still, in order to protect sources and methods, some of what we know will only be released to members of Congress, the representatives of the American people.  That means that some things we do know, we can't talk about publicly.
So what do we really know that we can talk about?     Well, we know that the Assad regime has the largest chemical weapons programs in the entire Middle East.  We know that the regime has used those weapons multiple times this year and has used them on a smaller scale but still it has used them against its own people, including not very far from where last Wednesday's attack happened.
We know that the regime was specifically determined to rid the Damascus suburbs of the opposition, and it was frustrated that it hadn't succeeded in doing so.  We know that for three days before the attack, the Syrian regime's chemical weapons personnel were on the ground in the area, making preparations.
And we know that the Syrian  regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks and taking precautions associated with chemical weapons.  We know that these were specific instructions.
We know where the rockets were launched from, and at what time. We know where they landed, and when.  We know rockets came only from regime-controlled areas and went only to opposition-controlled or contested neighborhoods.
And we know, as does the world, that just 90 minutes later all hell broke loose in the social media.  With our own eyes we have seen the thousands of reports from 11 separate sites in the Damascus suburbs.
All of them show and report victims with breathing difficulties, people twitching with spasms, coughing, rapid heartbeats, foaming at the mouth, unconsciousness, and death.  And we know it was ordinary Syrian citizens who reported all of these horrors.
Conventional Wisdom is to Stay out of Syria BUT is that the Correct Wisdom?
John R. Houk
© August 31, 2013
WATCH: Kerry Declares 'Assad Used Chemical Weapons Multiple Times'
© 2013 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.

Friday, August 30, 2013

AARP Leftist – AMAC Conservative

John R. Houk
© August 30, 2013

This is a paid ad from Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) using the Dustin Stockman – Don’t Tread on Me website as the vehicle for the email (I have seen similar vehicles for AMAC). I am not an AARP member however I do use the AARP sponsored health insurance written by United Healthcare as a Supplemental Medical Insurance to the Medicare that I use.

AARP is the largest senior citizen advocacy group in America. My problem with AARP is that it has become a Leftist rubber stamp for the Democratic Party. Below is an excerpt from Discover the Networks on AARP:

While AARP describes itself as politically “non-partisan,” it consistently supports leftist initiatives that reflect Democratic Party agendas and AARP's own stated commitment to “collective purpose” geared toward “social change” advocacy. For example, the organization backs entitlements for migrant workers; favors a progressive tax structure that places a disproportionate burden on high earners; endorses the estate tax; opposes the privatization of Social Security; opposes the reformation of Medicare and Social Security entitlements; and favors strict gun control. In 2003, AARP lauded the passage of a massive Medicare prescription drug plan which added, by some measures, $15.6 trillion to America's long-term entitlement deficit.

In 2009 AARP lobbied heavily in
favor of health-care reform, supporting in particular the “public option” which was favored by Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives but was dropped from the final legislation because it imperiled the bill’s passage in the Senate. AARP’s motives for backing the so-called “Obamacare” plan were as much financial as they were ideological. Because the legislation eliminated hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies from the Medicare Advantage program which allowed 11 million Medicare beneficiaries to buy additional benefits from private insurance companies, AARP foresaw that many of those people would now be in the market for products like its own “Medigap.”

A large number of AARP members felt betrayed by the organization's support for Obamacare. On July 28, 2009, for example, some 4,174 members
called the organization to register their opposition to the proposed healthcare plan, while only 36 members called in support. The following day, the numbers were 2,656 opposed, 23 in support.

Seventy-one pages of emails released in September 2012 by the House Energy and Commerce Committee
showed that throughout the Obamacare debates of 2009-10, AARP leaders—particularly policy chief John Rother, health policy director Nora Super (who later went to work for President Obama's Health and Human Services Department), executive vice president Nancy LeaMond, and senior vice president David Sloane—had been in constant contact with President Obama's top aides, most notably Nancy-Ann DeParle and Jim Messina. As the Wall Street Journal reports (READ ENTIRETY

In my opinion this places the AARP as a Leftist minion of the Obama agenda and the Dems. This is where AMAC (Not to be confused with a similar acronym which is American Muslim Advisory Council which is a Radical Muslim connected organization) enters the picture. Here is an AMAC excerpt from their website:

We are the new senior organization.  And we need your help to grow.

AMAC was developed for anyone age 50 or above, and to provide discounts not available anywhere else.

Discounts for AMAC members include hotel and motel discounts at over 7,000 locations across the country, discounts to help you save on auto and homeowners insurance, and we’re working very hard to provide exclusive discounts in your local area.

Stores, restaurants, and business in your town and neighborhood are joining the AMAC merchant network to provide you with substantial discounts of 10% or more on products and services.  New merchants are joining every day (see our Frequently Asked Questions for more information on our local discounts efforts).  Our local discount offerings have been a home run on Long Island and Westchester, New York, as well as central Florida.  It is our goal to expand our local discounts program to every town in America.  Help us spread the word by asking your favorite local merchants to contact us about being included in the program!

We at AMAC feel it is time for the people to speak out for the traditional American values of faith, family, and freedom.  We promise to be your advocate to fight the good fight.  Please explore our website to learn how you can benefit by becoming a member.  Stand together with us. (AMAC about page)

Check out the subtitles on AMAC’s key issues page:

Our Stance on Key Issues


AMAC strongly feels that American citizens are excessively taxed. There should be a reduction in income tax rates for all wage earners. Likewise, corporations are over taxed. When a corporation is …

Growth in Government

AMAC favors a reduction in the number of Federal departments and employees. Our government has grown at the Federal, State and local levels. In Washington we now have twice as many Departments as we had 100 years ago. As government grows …

Balanced Budget & the National Debt
The annual budget has gone out of control. The President and the congress have lost sight …

Medical Care

AMAC believes it is a serious mistake to have the Federal government interfere and dictate how medical care is provided in this country. The present system of State regulations and free enterprise has proven satisfactory for over 85% of our citizens. A simple change in …


AMAC is pro-life. We are against abortion in principle …


Amac believes in sensible Immigration Reform. We don’t believe in racial profiling or the harassment of legal immigrants. Amac is for legal immigration. There is …

Second Amendment- the right to bear arms

We believe that the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, is an integral part of our freedom.

AMAC supports the Constitution of the United States of America and our Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment.  Exercising the …

Fair Tax and Flat Tax

While AMAC has not taken an official stance on HR25/S13 or HR1040, we feel the American public should be aware of both options. AMAC believes … (READ ENTIRETY)

The point is AARP is Left Wing and is in love with big government which means too much power over the lives of Senior Citizens. The same organization and government that promises universal entitlement will be the same that toss unhealthy Seniors under the bus in deciding the poorer elderly serve no purpose as active members of society.

AMAC is for less government and showing ways to use the Free Market to make the costs of living longer an affordable situation even if the government begins to ignore you while unhealthy.

When AMAC becomes bigger with more members then it will also health insurance on a free market basis that will be competitive with AARP’s sponsored insurance (which Obamacare may eliminate because AARP sponsored insurance is a Free Market Supplemental Insurance).

Currently the best AMAC can do in Medical Care is to offer discount programs. For me that is not sufficient; however AMAC offers all the other perks and discounts that AARP members receive. Take note you don’t have to be an AARP member to participate in the Supplemental Insurance program they offer. You just have to be on Medicare to get the Free Market better coverage. So join AMAC. Help grow AMAC. Make AMAC membership an attractive competitor to AARP. Then AMAC will also be looked at by private insurance companies to offer a competitive plan for AMAC members.

Here is the ad I received in my email which is really an AMAC membership recruiting advertisement.

JRH 8/30/13
AMAC vs AARP –Battling for the Hearts and Minds of Seniors

Sent via Stockton Breakdown
Sent: August 29, 2013 6:19 AM

If you haven't chosen AMAC over AARP yet, you may want to reconsider.

During the first Presidential debate, President Obama touted the support of AARP for ObamaCare several times. While AARP immediately responded by saying, "AARP is a nonpartisan organization and we do not endorse political candidates nor coordinate with any candidate or political party", recently released emails between the White House and AARP operatives seem to indicate that AARP threw their tremendous lobbying power behind the legislation despite the fact they were getting calls overwhelmingly against it.

In fact, on September 20, 2012, Kimberley A. Strassel of the Wall Street Journal wrote:

"Thanks to just-released emails from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, we now know that AARP worked through 2009-2010 as an extension of a Democratic White House, toiling daily to pass a health bill that slashes $716 billion from Medicare, strips seniors of choice, and sets the stage for rationing. We know that despite AARP's awareness that its seniors overwhelmingly opposed the bill, the 'nonpartisan organization' chose to serve the president's agenda.

The 71 pages of emails show an AARP management taking orders from the White House, scripting the president's talking points, working to keep its board 'in line' and pledging a fealty to 'the cause.' Seniors deserve to know all this, as AARP seeks to present itself as neutral in this presidential election."

AARP refuses to take a formal position on the Independent Payment Advisory Board ("rationing board") portion of ObamaCare and even defends some aspects of the board. Given the negative impact that the IPAB will have on seniors, this is unbelievable (but sadly, not unexpected).

AMAC is against the harsh provisions in ObamaCare that gives the Federal government complete control of our healthcare. It destroys the best healthcare system in the world, takes 716 billion dollars out of Medicare, and has the power to restrict and ration our medical treatment.

AMAC is fighting to keep our right to receive treatment from our doctors without the interference of Federal bureaucrats.

Big government experiments like the "stimulus" and ObamaCare have only increased the uncertainty and instability, and are core reasons for the persistently high unemployment rate and why the household incomes of Mature Americans have declined so much.

AMAC, The Association of Mature American Citizens, believes we can do much better. As a steadily growing alternative to groups like AARP, and with an expanding influence in the Nation's capital, we aim to champion the interests of Mature Americans, seniors, and prospective retirees. We believe in religious freedom, free enterprise, and support common sense solutions to our Nation's largest challenges.

Bottom line - Our livelihoods, our families' future prosperity and our standards of living should not be threatened by bad policies emanating from Washington, DC.

AMAC Fights for You!

AMAC, the leading Conservative Alternative to AARP

AMAC, the leading Conservative Alternative to AARP

Dan Weber, President and Founder of AMAC, delivers remarks with the House GOP Doctors Caucus the day the Supreme Court decided to uphold ObamaCare. Standing with Dan are (from left to right) Representatives, Paul Broun (GA-10th), John Fleming (LA-4th), Phil Gingrey GA-11th), Joe Heck (NV-3rd), Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25th), and Tim Murphy (PA-18th).

As AMAC continues to grow and build a presence in DC, we're able to stand up to the tremendous lobbying power of AARP on behalf of concerned conservative Americans like you.

A senator told us, "You have got to grow AMAC!" When we asked him why, he said, "You don't understand, when AARP comes to our committees they say they represent older Americans. We know at times they really don't, but because of their numbers we have got to listen to them. When AMAC has one million members we can tell them they are not the only one we will listen to."

AMAC can do something AARP will not do - we'll fight against the horror of big government "solutions" like Obamacare with common sense solutions. But now, more than ever, AMAC needs your help!

If you want to belong to an organization that takes its marching orders from its members and speaks out for conservative values, JOIN AMAC!

For a limited time, a 5-year membership is available for less than $1 a month, and you'll have access to exclusive AMAC benefits - such as the members-only auto and home insurance program, access to licensed Medicare counselors, the AMAC Roadside Assistance Program, travel, and much more!

Better FOR YOU,
Better for America!

AARP Leftist – AMAC Conservative
John R. Houk
© August 30, 2013
AMAC vs AARP –Battling for the Hearts and Minds of Seniors

Thursday, August 29, 2013

How a Beloved Leader Becomes a Dictator

Wake Up America - Cover Peeling Off
John R. Houk
© August 29, 2013

Adolf Hitler utilized misleading propaganda to get himself to become Chancellor and Fuhrer of Germany. The Germans of the Sudetenland region of then Czechoslovakia Hitler believed should be a part of Greater Germany so it was annexed.

Hitler’s birth place Austria is a German speaking nation so of course it also must be a part of Greater Germany. Nazi armies marched to Austria to force the issue.

Communists were blamed for torching the Reichstag (German version of Congress/Parliament). Historians for years blamed this as a false flag accusation by the Nazis but more recent study has historians believing the German Communists really did Torch the Reichstag building on February 27, 1933. It doesn’t matter who torched the Reichstag because the incident led to Hitler having dictatorial powers and a manhunt for once rival Communists who were imprisoned or executed.

Then of course Hitler made no bones about his Aryan Supremacist beliefs (See Also HERE, HERE and HERE) which meant all non-German/non-Nordic races were inferior.  Some races in particular needed separation from the German population because Hitler believed them to be contaminating racial filth. In particular the European Jews were the victims (nearly 6 MILLION) of extermination due to the Aryan Superiority belief. And roughly another 6 MILLION races, physically/mentally handicapped and homosexuals met the same fate as the Jews under Hitler’s Nazi regime.

Then the Hitler false flag that plunged the world into global war occurred. Hitler made up the story that Poland attacked Germany. So of course Hitler could not let that lie go without punishment. Nazi Germany’s first military blitzkrieg swept through Poland’s antiquated military defenses and a secret deal Hitler made with Stalin created a Polish eastern front as the Soviet army came with the intention of dividing Poland between Nazis and Communists. Britain and France committed to war if Poland was invaded. Hitler later turned on Stalin and began an invasion of the USSR.

I hope you enjoyed this simplistic offering of the beginning of WWII in 1939 (December 7, 1941 for the USA as Japan gave Isolationist Americans an excuse to join the British against the Nazis). Here is why I went over this very brief WWII beginnings. Danny Jeffrey in an essay entitled “Operation Canned Goods or How to Start another War”. The essay uses the Hitler method to take over a government as an analogy of potential events occurring NOW in the USA and the world. Danny sees an amazing parallel to the beginnings of Nazi Germany and the transformative path (Obama’s “Change”) Barack Hussein Obama is walking on today. Here is a blurb, actually a very insightful blurb from Danny Jeffrey:

Obama is taking us down the same path to hyperinflation. He is also taking us down the path to World War Three. What the people wanted and what Hitler wanted were two very different things and yet Hitler had to convince the German populace that war was in their best interests or at least Germany's national honor.

Every dictator needs an enemy of the state on which to blame all problems, and he needs a way to start a war and blame the other nation. Adolf Hitler had the Jews to blame when he came to power, Barrack Obama has the white conservatives. Different dictator, different time, and a different group to blame, but the methods and the goals are still the same.

One of the keys to understanding this essay is the international foreign policy doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Here is a brief description from a R2P friendly website:

The RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT ("RtoP" or "R2P") is a new international security and human rights norm to address the international community’s failure to prevent and stop genocides, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. (International Coalition for The Responsibility to Protect – ICRtoP)

Danny Jeffrey is a lot less altruistic toward R2P. AND his insight on R2P is well founded. Danny believes R2P is a foundational concept for Leftist domination in world affairs and that the Leftist-in-Chief that designed the altruistic doctrine was none other than George Soros. Danny points that out in his essay I linked above. I wish Danny’s Freedom Rings 1776 had a search feature so you could type a search on George Soros because he has a lot of pertinent information there. Using Google I typed in Freedom Rings 1776: George Soros. At least the first page (I didn’t check further) had a number of Danny’s posts on George Soros. HERE is the Google link that came up for me. I took the liberty of excerpting Danny Jeffrey relating to Soros and R2P. The excerpts go to producing an enlightening picture of the Soros-Obama paradigm that somewhat mirrors Adolf Hitler’s charismatic political rise. Do I think it will happen in Obama? I am not willing to see that; however I didn’t think President Barack Hussein Obama would be reelected in 2012.

JRH 8/29/13
Here are some Danny Jeffrey Excerpts on the George Soros Doctrine of Responsibility to Protect. For even more clarity you should each essay in entirety.

The George Soros sponsored Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect could be the key to the destruction of Israel and the beginning of nuclear war.

The whole concept of this Soros sponsored group is that the UN can attack any nation that is using force against those who are trying to take the reins of power. This option was not used in the genocide of Darfur. It was not used in the assault on revolutionary Iranians. It was unnecessary in Egypt and this Responsibility to Protect is first being used in Libya. It is my firm belief that the Libyan scenario is but a trial balloon to set a precedent. Later it will be used against Israel...the next time they are attacked and they dare fight back.

The Global Center For The Responsibility To Protect (GCRP) sounds like such a noble organization. It is such a shame that it is based on lies and hatred. When seeking truth, follow the money trail. The GCRP is funded by The International Crisis Group (ICG) and The Human Rights Watch. (HRW).

The ICG is in turn funded by the Soros Group The Open Society Institute (OSI).

… The GCRP is a political weapon of conquest, created by, and wielded by, George Soros, and thanks to Barrack Obama, backed by the military might of the United States.

My greatest concern was The Responsibility To Protect (R2P), a George Soros generated plan to provide a no fly zone over any nation that Islamic Jihadists are attacking. That was what defeated Libya and at the time I stated that this assault on Libya's air force was only to set a precedent, predicting that the tactic would one day be called upon to defend yet more Jihadists when they attack Israel.

… Jihadists wear no uniforms. They are technically civilians, "rebels" if you will, but these rebels are not from Syria. They have come from all over the Middle East and some from Europe and the UK. They are mercenaries, invaders, paid for their service. The lack of uniforms give the illusion that they are civilians thus permitting the terms of R2P to be employed to protect the "innocent". …
I have pondered long and hard about the issue of Israel and have written many essays on the topic, including discussions of Responsibility To Protect (R2P). That is a Soros sponsored doctrine that calls for the nations of the west to create a no fly zone over any nation that is under attack by "civilians" such as we saw in Libya as the "civilians" of Al Qaeda overran a sovereign nations thanks to the air cover and weapons we provided. Libya was but a UN legal precedent as R2P was founded solely for the purpose of eventually supporting the upcoming Islamic attack on Israel.

Another part of R2P that is a Catch 22 is that it forbids a sovereign nation from using its aircraft against "civilians". …