The Southern
Poverty Law Center (SPLC) [See Also DTN]
might as well be the chief propaganda machine for all things Leftist/Marxist in
America. Not only does the SPLC target fringe groups (e.g. KKK, Neo-Nazis,
Aryans, Christian Identity, etc.), but they seek to smear traditional
Christian/American values organizations.
The SPLC has placed many good and non-violent organizations
on a hate list being falsely accused of racism and bigotry while giving a pass
to Leftist fringe groups. Bill Warner is one of those targeted by the SPLC. The
SPLC would label Warner an Islamophobe racist merely because he shares the
truth about Islam.
There was a time in America when freedom of speech was
considered so basic that it was rarely talked about. Today “civil rights”
organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are devoted to
silencing the voices who insist on speaking their minds. The SPLC does not
recognize honest differences of opinions, but instead, all who do not adhere to
its leftist politics are called "racist-hater-bigot-Islamophobe".
That's one word, mind you.
The SPLC has found fellow totalitarians in such groups as the Jewish
Federation who have turned from tolerance of political differences to attempts
to silence dissident voices to Islamic fundamentalists like the Council on
American Islamic Relations (CAIR).
As a dissident, I say give me your best shot. No amount of
name calling can shut me up.
[Email provides link to a Political Islam post with video]
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) came to my hometown
at the invitation of the Jewish Federation. Now the SPLC is the supreme judge
of social morality. The SPLC is the US hate monitor and is the basis for
censorship by Twitter, Face Book, Google, and You Tube. I am a
racist-hater-bigot- Islamophobe according to the SPLC because I talk about
political Islam.
Part of the problem with the SPLC judgment or decree is that
there is no due process or redress. There is no way to challenge them. Their
purpose is to shame and drive their victims out of business.
The purpose of the SPLC is to censor all those who have
different political ideas. They oppose free speech as hate speech. They reject
fact based reasoning and critical thought. The Jewish Federation is a partner
with these totalitarians. They are joined by the Christians who are apologists
for Islam.
The SPLC, the Federation or the other apologists cannot
stand a critical view of political Islam. Their only response is that critical
thinkers are racist-hater-bigot Islamophobes. Knowledge is bigotry and denial
is a virtue.
Islam is a cultural,
religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest
to kafirs (non-Muslims)
since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political
system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the
traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.
CSPI
Center for the Study of
Political Islam (CSPI) is an educational organization dedicated to enlightening
the general public about the doctrine of political Islam based on the works of
Dr. Bill Warner.
Our Mission
Political Islam has
subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the
world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and
his god, Allah.
The Five Principles
Islam’s Trilogy of three
sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the
Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes
apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.
All of Islam is based upon
the Trilogy—Koran, Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his
Traditions).
Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political
ideology.
Islam divides the world into
Muslims and unbelievers, kafirs.
Political Islam always has
two different ways to treat kafirs—dualistic ethics. Kafirs can be abused in
… READ THE REST
The Horowitz IG Report on the FBI/DOJ handling of Crooked
Hillary’s email server investigation came out June 14. I have no doubt the
Leftist MSM will report this underlying theme: Horowitz found no political
bias.
I haven’t personally read the 568-page report
yet, but a quick read of primarily Conservative sources commenting the report,
Michael Horowitz both let’s the FBI off the hook relating bias and singles out
bias of certain FBI/DOJ members. How Horowitz can generalize no overall bias
and individual bias simultaneously is beyond me. I believe another instalment
of Horowitz’s IG investigation is in the future.
Here are some salient observations that Conservative sources
are observing:
§Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch acted
improperly in not cutting short a meeting aboard an aircraft with former
President Bill Clinton during the investigation of Hillary Clinton. Both Lynch
and Bill Clinton denied discussing the ongoing email probe during the meeting.
§The FBI improperly permitted two Clinton aides who were
witnesses in the investigation to sit in on the FBI's questioning of Clinton
§Comey drafted an initial statement exonerating Clinton months
before the investigation ended. FBI agents' actions surrounding the DOJ/FBI
interview of Hillary Clinton were 'inappropriate' and created appearance of
bias
§The draft statement exonerating Clinton also removed the term
"gross negligence"—a condition that could have been used for
prosecution—and replaced with "especially concerning." - Comey
usurped the authority of the attorney general when he announced during a July
2016 press conference that the FBI would not be recommending charges against
Clinton, then the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
§An initial assessment in the Comey draft statement saying
foreign spy services were "reasonably likely" to have accessed the
classified data on the Clinton server was replaced with "possible."
§FBI ethics officials "did not fully appreciate" the
potential conflict of interest by former FBI Director Andrew McCabe's wife
receiving $675,288 in 2015 from Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe,
then-governor of Virginia, for her political campaign for a state senate seat.
McCabe became head of the email probe in early 2016.
§The FBI improperly regarded a parallel investigation of
Russian collusion with the Trump presidential campaign in 2016 to be more
important the Clinton email probe.
§New texts between FBI lovers Strzok and Page were
'disappointing' and cast a shadow over the integrity of the entire Clinton
email probe - Strzok's and Page's text messages expressing pro-Clinton and
anti-Trump views raised questions about whether they allowed their political
leanings to interfere with their work. - The senior FBI officials Peter Strzok
and Lisa Page may have had a "willingness to take official action" to
hurt Donald Trump's chances of winning the 2016 election.
§Five unnamed FBI employees -- including one lawyer who later
worked on the Mueller probe -- are under scrutiny for anti-Trump bias
§President Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Hillary
Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account
§Despite Clinton connections, former Assistant Attorney
General Peter Kadzik and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe didn't fully
recuse themselves
§'Insubordinate' Ex-FBI Director James Comey repeatedly
violated policy and inaccurately described the legal situation surrounding
Clinton's emails - While Comey's conduct was "insubordinate," his
actions and those of others in the FBI were not affected by bias.
§Comey departed "clearly and dramatically" from FBI
and DOJ guidelines while overseeing the Clinton investigation. Comey's
decisions "negatively impacted the perception of the FBI" and the
DOJ.
§Comey often used a personal email account to conduct official
FBI business. (These observed points are a blended mix from three sources: Fox
News, Business
Insider and Washington
Free Beacon)
These points are hardly exhaustive, but they provide a
decent snapshot of political bias even though the Horowitz IG Report erroneously
claims no political bias affected the FBI/DOJ investigation of the Crooked
Hillary illegal private email server.
I don’t know if you noticed. The Horowitz IG Report sounds
an awful lot just Comey going down a list of Crooked Hillary practices that any
two-bit lawyer could match to U.S. Statutes violated. Violations that have
had criminal prosecutions!
I will cross post some of Conservative sources I felt
aligned more with my thoughts, but first here are a few titles that I perused
through.
Senior FBI agent threatened to prevent Trump election
in text message; agents took gifts from reporters; By Bill Gertz; Washington Free Beacon;
6/14/18 5:02 pm
The IG report released Thursday revealed ANOTHER lawyer
was removed from Mueller’s team of liberal hacks February of this year after
anti-Trump text messages surfaced.
‘Viva Le Resistance,’ said the unidentified Trump-hating
(future) Mueller lawyer in a November 2016 text message.
An FBI attorney who worked on
the special counsel’s Russia investigation until earlier this year sent
anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, including one exclaiming: “Viva le
Resistance.”
The attorney’s comments are
revealed in a Justice Department inspector general’s report released on
Thursday.
The lawyer is not identified,
but he worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and was the FBI’s lead
attorney on the investigation into Russian election interference. He was
assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation soon after it began
in May 2017 and left in late February of this year after some of his private
messages were shared with the special counsel.
The unidentified FBI lawyer said he was “numb” just days
after Trump was elected to the White House.
Apparently the FBI lawyer became galvanized in his effort to
resist Trump, reported Chuck Ross:
“Is it making you rethink your
commitment to the Trump administration?” one FBI lawyer wrote on Nov. 22, 2016.
“Hell no. Viva le
resistance,” the future Mueller attorney responded.
According to the report, this Trump-hating FBI lawyer
claimed in an interview with the Office of Inspector General he didn’t let his
political feelings or beliefs impact his work on Hillary’s email investigation
or the Russia probe.
RIGHT.
And Horowitz said there was no political bias at the FBI…
+++++++++++++++++++++
CNN: Strzok and Page Didn’t Attack Trump, HE Attacked
Them!
Biggest takeaway from IG report: With all odds stacked
against him by a crazed, frenzied mainstream/social media,
Hollywood/Entertainment, Never Trumpers, backstabbers in his own party, an
Obama-weaponized FBI, Trump was elected President
“We’ll stop it.” Three now infamous little
words that can never be walked back and ones that prove beyond any shadow of a
doubt that the media of the day and a rogue Obama-weaponized FBI were on the
same choir page during the 2016 presidential election campaign.
How the mighty are falling like dominoes before the very
eyes of the masses—in spite of intense media backup. The same masses that
Hillary Rodham Clinton called “deplorables” and that some unidentified
FBI yob described as “mostly poor and middleclass” members of society who
voted Donald Trump.
“All the people who were initially
voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put
out,” the employee wrote. “Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class,
uneducated, lazy POS (sic) that think he will magically grant them jobs for
doing nothing. They probably didn’t watch the debates, aren’t fully educated on
his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.” (Fox
News, June 14. 2018)
All Obama’s voters were ever after, Mr. Yob, were kitchens,
welfare for life and Obama phones.
“Despite Strzok’s extremely
inappropriate texting — it’s wildly improper for someone in his position to
express animus or favoritism toward a particular candidate — the inspector
general found no evidence that Strzok acted on his text to Page.” (CNN,
JUNE 14, 2018.)
No acting on his text other than turning the political world
upside down, inside out and on its head.
The biggest three little words, which came in August 2016
from disgraced FBI agent, Peter Strzok, once deputy head of counterintelligence
at the FBI, working on both the Trump-Russia probe and the ‘investigation’ into
Hillary Clinton’s private email server, were referenced in yesterday’s
massively toned down, 500-page IG report, but the biggest laugh comes a day
later from Fake News Grand Central CNN:
“The massive report from Department
of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz makes clear that while several
FBI officials broke with bureau protocol in their handling of the investigation
into Hillary Clinton’s private email server during the 2016 campaign, they were
not motivated by political bias against Donald Trump.” (CNN)
ONLY “several FBI officials “broke with bureau protocol” in
their handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email
server. And they “WERE NOT” motivated by political bias against Donald
Trump.”
Take THAT, President Trump, you paranoid, “not-MY-president,
you!
The biggest reaction to the questionable IG report didn’t
come from the public, media-teased for weeks before its final inelegant
release—but from the media—shown as working for the same goals as Strzok and
his mistress Lisa Page.
Unforgettable LOLs for today’s CNN headline: ‘How 7 words in
the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the ‘deep state’ ammo he wanted’.
Trump had his Deep State ammo from the get-go. Video
proof exists in the hysterics, wailing and weeping of the networks’ talking
heads in the wee hours of Nov. 9, 2016.
In their unprofessional, desperate lovers’ texts, Strzok and
Page were only putting into words the collective fervent wishes of the
mainstream and social media.
Evidence of the ill will the pair bore for Donald Trump:
PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever
going to become president, right? Right?!” STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”
“Even before the release of these
new text messages between Page and Strzok, who were having an extramarital
affair during the campaign, Trump has focused on the duo as aligned against
him. (CNN)
Wow, Strzok-Page, the incompetent
& corrupt FBI lovers, have texts referring to a counter-intelligence
operation into the Trump Campaign dating way back to December, 2015. SPYGATE is
in full force! Is the Mainstream Media interested yet? Big
stuff!
“SPYGATE is in full force! Is the
Mainstream Media interested yet? Big stuff!” (There’s no evidence that Strzok,
Page or the broader FBI were spying on Trump’s campaign.)
No, they were only trying to dump it.
And this is richest of all: “Trump has attacked the two
since, at least last December, when emails and text between Strzok and Page
were released, showing that both were skeptical of Trump. (Strzok was dismissed
from the special counsel probe being run by Robert Mueller in summer 2017.)
This meme advances the outrageous lie that Trump was
“attacking” Strzok and Page, rather than them attacking him.
Nor was Strzok merely dismissed from the special counsel
being run by Robert Mueller in the summer of 2017, he was demoted and
will some day be handsomely pensioned off.
Page left the scene returning to the same kind of obscurity
she had before becoming FBI agent Strzok’s mistress.
The media will be falling over backwards to keep the masses
from thinking about the report’s real biggest takeaway:
The biggest takeaway from the IG report is this: With all
odds stacked against him by a crazed and frenzied mainstream/social media,
Hollywood/Entertainment Industry, Never Trumpers, backstabbers in his own party
and an Obama-weaponized FBI, etc., etc., etc, Donald Trump was handily elected
as President of the United States.
+++++++++++++++++
Strassel: ‘Don’t believe anyone
who tells you Horowitz didn’t find bias. I can still hear the echoes of the
howls…’
Wall Street Journal opinion columnist Kimberley Strassel
took to Twitter to say what many Americans are thinking about Thursday’s
release of the Department of Justice inspector general’s report, that
something’s amiss because what’s in the report does not match the summary of
the report.
In a series of tweets, Strassel began by noting the careful
play on words by inspector general Michael Horowitz when he stressed
that they “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper
considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific
investigative actions we reviewed.”
“Don’t believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn’t find bias,”
she tweeted. “He very carefully says that he found no ‘documentary’ evidence
that bias produced ‘specific investigatory decisions.”
2)
It means he didn't catch anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down
that they took a specific step to aid a candidate. You know, like:
"Let's give out this Combetta immunity deal so nothing comes
out that will derail Hillary for President." #IGReport
Strassel notes that while no one actually put it in writing
that they were politically motivated, Horowitz “in fact finds bias everywhere.”
And that “this same cast of characters who the IG has now
found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation” is now to be trusted
working the Trump-Russia probe.
4)
Meanwhile this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a
hash of the Clinton investigation and who demonstrate such bias, seamlessly
moved to the Trump investigation. And we're supposed to think they got
that one right? #IGReport
6)
People failing to adhere to their recusals (Kadzik/McCabe). Lynch hanging with
Bill. Staff helping Comey conceal details of presser from DOJ bosses. Use of
personal email and laptops. Leaks. Accepting gifts from media. Agent
affairs/relationships.
She also highlighted “stunning examples of incompetence,”
such as former FBI director James Comey explaining that he didn’t grasp the
importance of Anthony Weiner’s laptop because he wasn’t aware of Weiner being
married to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin.
8)
And I can still hear the echo of the howls from when Trump fired Comey. Still
waiting to hear the apologies now that this report has backstopped the
Rosenstein memo and the obvious grounds for dismissal.
And people dared to question President Donald Trump’s
decision to fire Comey?
One thing is certain, the wording of the report allowed the
anti-Trump media to run with headlines screaming that the IG report “found no
political bias.”
But there’s a theory on what that was all about, as seen in
a tweet from social media account The Last Refuge — that also happens to
support the idea that the summary, “written post facto by administrators in
FBI/DOJ leadership,” fails to correspond with what’s in the report.
“The ‘executive summary’ was written to protect the
institutions and that’s where the media are getting ALL of their headlines,”
the tweet reads. “However, the internal body, the investigative report inside,
is entirely contradictory to the summary. The facts are DEVASTATING.”
Others commented, saying that Horowitz “pulled his punch
just like Comey did with Hillary [Clinton].”
“I see some really damning stuff in this IG report,” tweeted
social media user Brian Wilson. “But I’ll just go ahead and say it: The IG
pulled his punch just like Comey did with Hillary. I’m stunned by the gathered
evidence of bias … and shocked the IG doesn’t think the bias impacted the
investigation.”
I
see some really damning stuff in this IG report. But I’ll just go ahead and say
it: The IG pulled his punch just like Comey did with Hillary. I’m stunned by
the gathered evidence of bias ... and shocked the IG doesn’t think the bias
impacted the investigation.
The liberal media has been quick to dismiss the IG’s
findings, but as former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino noted, the report is
“devastating.”
“The IG report is only a ‘nothing-burger’ to people who know
nothing about the case. It’s a devastating report which will damage Obama,
Comey, Hillary, Page, Strzok, and more. Read it and you’ll clearly see the
troubling pieces of it,” he tweeted.
The IG report is only a
“nothing-burger” to people who know nothing about the case. It’s a devastating
report which will damage Obama, Comey, Hillary, Page, Strzok, and more. Read it
and you’ll clearly see the troubling pieces of it.
Most Americans are clueless about the enormous assault of
European so-called democracies against any Free Speech exposing the god-awful
crimes of Muslim immigrants, refugees and next-gen born Muslims perpetuated
AGAINST the inherent non-Muslim citizens.
Why are Americans clueless? Because the American Leftist
Mainstream Media (MSM) is quite supportive of these Free Speech restrictions.
Why are European democracies restricting Free Speech?
Because the idiocy of cultural Multicultural Diversity has capture the
political elites running those nations. Muslim crimes therefore must be hidden
from their European citizens to maintain the perversity that Islamic culture is
compatible with the values of Western culture.
In Europe you can actually go to jail for exposing Muslim
crimes to the public! The latest victim that I am aware of is Tommy Robinson. I
wonder how many others have been jail or prosecuted for exposing the nature of
Islamic culture?
Americans need to pay attention to what is occurring in
Europe. American Leftists (i.e. Democrats) desire to follow the European Multiculturalist
paradigm.
Geert Wilders spoke at a massive rally for Tommy Robinson on
Saturday. 20,000 people came out to call for Tommy’s release, and Wilders took
the opportunity to put the political elites of Britain and continental Europe
on notice.
“Our governments,” Wilders declared, “sold us out with mass
immigration. With Islamization. With open borders. We are almost foreigners in
our own lands. And if we complain about it, they call us racists and Islamophobes.
But I say, no more! And what do you say? No more! And that’s right: enough is
enough. We will not be gagged anymore. No more tyranny.”
It was extraordinary that the British authorities allowed
Wilders into the country at all. Several years ago he was banned from entering
the country, but although the ban was reversed on appeal, the British
government recently banned Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern
and Lutz Bachmann from entering, all for the crime of opposing jihad terror and
Sharia oppression, and thereby made it clear that it is more authoritarian and
unwilling to uphold the freedom of speech than ever – at least when it comes to
criticism of Islam, Muslim rape gangs, and mass Muslim migration.
Even worse, the bannings of Sellner, Pettibone, Southern,
and Bachmann were just part of a long pattern. Pamela Geller and I were banned
from entering Britain in 2013, apparently for life, also for the crime of telling
the truth about Islam and jihad. Meanwhile, Britain has a steadily
lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation.
Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so
hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK
Home Office welcomed him into Britain.
The UK Home Office also
admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the
fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of
five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the
easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth –
tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the
above.”
Theresa May’s relentlessly appeasement-minded
government also
admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a
foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed
by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, the
UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where
Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
But now matters are coming to a head. Apparently British
authorities decided that it would be too politically costly for them to bar
Wilders again. And so he entered, and spoke, and gave them a strong dose of the
reality that they are determined to ignore and deny.
Tommy Robinson is in prison today because he violated a
court order demanding that he not film videos outside the trials of Muslim rape
gangs. Clearly the government’s intent was to make sure that as few people as
possible discovered the truth about its massive, years-long cover-up of those
rape gangs, and refusal to prosecute the perpetrators. Theresa May and company
obvious hope that other Britons who are furious about the sacrifice of
thousands of British girls to the idols of “diversity” and “multiculturalism”
will see what happened to Tommy, and be frightened into silence.
The British government, in imprisoning Tommy Robinson, has
shown itself willing to incarcerate people for having opinions that it
considers unacceptable. That heralds the death of Britain as a free society and
the beginning of an authoritarian police state there, unless this slide to
totalitarianism is stopped now. British public figures, whatever criticism they
have leveled against Tommy Robinson in the past, should be calling for him to
be freed today, or else they will be exposing themselves as supporting the
degeneration of Britain into a police state.
Wilders addressed this endeavor head-on, declaring: “We will
not be silenced. We will not be intimidated. And we tell the governments, we
are not afraid of you. We will never surrender. We will stand strong and do our
duty. We will defend our civilization. And we will protect our people.”
Wilders added: “And I tell you, to the governments. You can
throw us in jail, but you will never defeat us. Because, my friends, for every
Tommy whom you imprison, thousands will rise up. So take notice, Theresa May.
Take notice, Dutch Prime Minister Rutte. Take notice, Mrs. Merkel or President
Macron. Take notice: the future is ours and not yours. We will defeat you
politically, because we, my friends, we are the people.”
If Wilders’ words don’t prove true, it will be because the
death of free societies in Britain and Western Europe is truly at hand.
FRONTPAGE MAG IS A PROUD
PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER
The DHFC is dedicated to the
defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are
under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.
The David Horowitz Freedom
Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to
destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself
in a time of terror. The leftist offensive is most obvious on our
nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from
indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place
in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.
Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center
provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of
websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media,
and in national politics throughout the year.
David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture
in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular
culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC
attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club,
the Individual
Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic
Freedom.
FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political
commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month
(65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites. The
magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented
over the last two years by the presence of four Shillman Fellows in
Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has
recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel
Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.
A few European nations are finally comprehending just how
dangerous the culture of Islam is to Western Civilization. Last week Austria
gave the boot to Mosques that make no bones about following
Muhammad’s agenda for global Islamization. Today I found out Denmark is making sure all refugees are going
to be made to learn what it means to be a Dane or leave Denmark.
After coming to the realization that second-generation Muslim
immigrants are predisposed to committing horrific terrorist attacks on
non-Muslims (especially women and children), the Danish government has come
upon a novel solution: Why not try to assimilate the immigrants to Danish
culture? Crazy, right?
Apparently the Danes have reached a conclusion that their
soil is not magical and that just because a Muslim sets foot in Denmark and is
given citizenship papers, it does not automatically transform them into a Dane
with appreciation for Western civilization, democracy, and the moral restraint
to not punch a woman in the face and call her a whore for wearing an
ankle-revealing dress.
If only Congress would realize this about our non-magical
soil in America! We know this sounds totally insane, but other nations actually
do have these kooky ideas about immigration. Don’t believe us? Fly to Tokyo
tomorrow and declare yourself to be Japanese. We’ll wait for you to report back
with results!
Meanwhile, the Danish government will now require children
in Muslim ghettos to undergo 25 hours of coursework on the meanings of Easter
and Christmas, Christian morals, language skills and, presumably, the need to
not murder members of your host community based on your parents’ barbaric
8th-century values. (Perhaps they should teach the Muslims about Denmark’s
Viking history as well, just to let it sink in that they are the minority and
the Danes will only be pushed so far before bringing back the “blood eagle.”
Just saying.)
Best of all, there’s an immediate punishment that will be
meted out if any Muslim parents don’t enroll their kids in the Danish
Christianity classes. Check out the video below to learn what it is!
Denmark’s government said Monday
that children living in a primarily Muslim immigrant community are required to
attend classes on democracy, language, and Danish Christian traditions.
Danish parents living in ghettos —
an official Danish term for non-western immigrant communities — must enroll
their children into 25 hours of public education starting at age one, according to Reuters.
The ghettos for which this new
policy is mandatory are composed mainly of Muslim migrants from Middle Eastern
countries. The classes will focus on language skills, foundational education,
as well as integral facets of Danish culture like democracy, equality and
Christian holidays like Easter and Christmas. (RELATED: Danish
Politician Slammed For Saying Fasting Muslims Pose Work Safety Threat)
Immigrant parents who do not enroll
their children in the mandatory public education program will lose their child
welfare benefits. Parents who have already placed their children in daycare
programs are not required to enroll their children in these classes. The new
policy, on which major opposition parties agreed with the leading Liberal Party
and the supporting nationalist Danish People’s Party, was put forward as part
of a solution to the problem of integrating Muslim immigrants into Denmark’s
western, democratic culture. The leading opposition party, The Social
Democratic Party, has taken a harder stance toward Muslim migrants as the
problem of migrant communities’ refusal to integrate has persisted in recent
years.
Non-western immigrants
comprise 66.5 percent of the population of ghetto areas and 8.7 percent of
Denmark’s overall population of 5.7 million, according to EuroNews. …
Patriotic Viral News was
designed to bring you the latest conservative news stories and viral videos
from around the web. Our videos will inspire, provoke thought, and sometimes
even enrage, though most importantly we want them to be shared.
We encourage you to share these pages with friends, family, and anyone else who
wants America to become the great nation it once was.
Sign up for our free newsletter today so you don’t miss a single story.
As I was putting together my
own warning about Islam’s danger to America’s culture of Life,
Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, Justin Smith sent a similar and admittedly
much more erudite submission than my effort. Justin’s patriotism in this essay
is justifiably passionate and undoubtedly drive Multicultural Leftists into
apoplexy.
I have been ringing the clarion bell warning on the
existential threat of Islam for years -- since 1979 -- and it is only in the
last few recent years, even after 9/11, that Americans even seem to remotely
understand the methodology and machinations within Islam, Sharia law and all
that it demands of its adherents and all non-Muslims they engage.
There are some who foolishly believe Muslims are just like us and only
differing by praying on mats pointed to Mecca, with their faces on the floor.
Wrong! Their history belies their intentions toward you. Do not be beguiled by
the weakest among them; be warned by their most violent and pernicious and be
aware it is impossible to tell the difference.
Muslims aren't necessarily trying to "change our
Constitution", but they do use its freedoms to support their call for
Sharia Law in America. They work continually to try to codify Sharia Law into
U.S. Law, but fortunately, many states have passed the American Laws for
American Courts bill that prevents a judge from considering any Sharia
precedent in a case.
This does not stop the current advancement of Sharia Law as
a parallel system in our communities, which leads to the Balkanization of any
nation. Sharia Law is the mechanism primarily behind the creation of entire
Muslim operated communities, cities and regions --- the "no go zones"
one finds in France, Germany and the U.K and now here in America, in places
like Dearborn, Michigan, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Islamberg, New York.
Ask yourself, what is the value to us from the world of
Mohammedanism and Islam? What value has Islam contributed to human society in
the last 500 years? Name one worthy thing besides couscous it has
given the world in that time?
In every country where Muslims are in the minority, they are
obsessed with minority rights. In every country with a Muslim majority,
there are no minority rights.
But it's not just the Muslims who are representing the
threat to our Constitution and the entire nation by way of Sharia Law.
During her tenure as Dean of Harvard Law School, Elena
Kagan, now a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, revealed, inadvertently or not,
the evil agenda of the Leftists in her May 2007 presentation, in which she
stated that Sharia Law was compatible with our Constitution and
could be incorporated within U.S. law. In Dec. 2005, she accepted $20 million
from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal for her pet project at Harvard, the
Islamic Legal Studies Program.
There exists an entire group of people in all echelons of
our government, from the local and state to the federal, some citizens and some
not, who have been educated and lived much of their lives abroad. From the
former “president” on down, many of these people have little connection and
even less love for our Republic and the traditional American culture and
principles upon which the U.S. was founded. These collaborators and traitors
continue to tolerate the abuses and acts of terrorism those sons of Mohammed
commit, and while they do not hesitate to command a 95 year old invalid to remove her diaper in
an airport, a “possible security risk”, due to their own cowardice
and complicity, they cannot and will not name the enemy, because the enemy is
them and their Muslim allies.
There is one common thread for all the misery, death and
suffering in the Middle-East, which is pervasive and dominant...Islam. To
welcome its adherents and believers into your midst is to welcome coming
misery, suffering and death in equal proportions to the size of any host
nation's Muslim population, until they reach majority at which time misery
metastasizes.
The formula here is not hard to discern. They complain about
discrimination as a minority until they gain control, at which time their
discrimination against other ideologies and all religions is all consuming.
The enemy is Islam and the Sharia Law doctrine that
accompanies it!
There is a ring of fire and death around Muslim territory in
the Middle-East, South-East Asia, Africa and the "Stans"
regions. Any area Islam touches is consumed by and impaled by the
eon-and-a-half-old program of proselytizing with force and conquest, by the zealots
of the ideology of Islam, the Muslim so-called "religion of peace".
To invite them in is to invite the enemy into your camp. Keep Islam confined
within the ring.
Marine Le Pen, former French presidential candidate stated:
"Austria is taking things in hand and showing that 'when you want to, you
can!'"
Matteo Salvini, Italy's new interior minister, exclaimed:
"Those who exploit their faith to endanger a country's security should be
expelled!"
And that is why our future elections remain critical, if we
do not want to continue on our own current path of Islamization and become just
as cowed and badgered and suppressed, especially through hate-speech
"laws", as Eurabia.
We need to elect people who understand the existential threat of Islam and who
will pass laws aimed at deporting Muslims and extinguishing and eradicating
Islam's influence and presence in our country.
All Muslims must be expelled from America and all mosques
destroyed. Muslim immigration to America must be halted.
