John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© April 4, 2026
Ever since the experience of the COVID Tyranny days under the
installed Biden regime I have developed a huge distrust for Federal policing
agencies and Federal Intel agencies. I suspect many of you developed that
distrust long before the COVID Tyranny.
For me it became real when my questioning Election integrity
and a refusal to follow medical narrative mandates publicly placed me in an
Enemy of the State by the then ruling Dems. There I was, a Senior Citizen,
feeling like I had got stuck into some kind of 1960s 1970s time warp in which
dissent made me eligible for wiretapping, Internet spying and/or perhaps even a
crazy domestic FISA search of my personal life.
DID THAT ACTUALLY HAPPEN? Probably not. On the scale of the
Enemy of the State radar my existence as a blogging dissident was a very small
potatoes blip. All Big Tech had to do to silence my dissent was to censor me.
And that happened frequently to me on my Blogger blog and on Social Media.
Since President Trump has gained Office a 2nd
time I’ve noticed the Community Guidelines violation accusations have trickled
to almost nothing. It does still occasionally happen but hardly at all. And the
Social Media I was censored and digitally-jailed often are places I have
limited my presence on an extreme basis. I could whine more about that however it
is not the point of this post.
A couple of days ago I ran into a Substack Racket News post informing
readers the FBI bad actions of the past have not abated in the present. Couple
that Racket News read with a Telegram (really an X-Tweet cross post)
post that links the FBI with the CIA also in the continuation of bad activities
against American citizens in the form of experimentation. KEEP IN MIND these
were taxpayer funded operations against citizens that the Constitution says are
supposed to be protected.
I am a President Trump guy. But the government that the
Constitution says that he is in charge is currently too insidious with a Deep
State infection for him to weed out unless extra-Constitutional means are
employed. Some might call that a civil war.
Read the shared posts and I hope on a personal you choose
dissent. Always begin dissent peacefully. When oppression is the response to
dissent, what is the next step?
JRH
4/4/26
ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help
me be a voice for Liberty:
Please
Support SlantRight 2.0
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income. Diana
& I endorse Magic Functional Coffee and Matcha Tea. It’s MAGIC because
there is a weight loss or weight control emphasis among other wellbeing
benefits. Clicking the Diana Wellness
Store will take you to the online store. CLICK the BUY tab and/or JOIN tab.
Joining means you get COFFEE discount, can operate your store and recruit your
own business & customers. Decide on a level to enter to Network your own
Store. DRINK COFFEE and/or MAKE MONEY!:
https://dianawellnessstore.com
Have Coffee
Customer Question or Earn Money Question - Ask Diana at Facebook
Group Good
Life Coffee
****************************
EXCLUSIVE: Exposing the FBI’s Human Experimentation
Studies
"Who has my saliva from ten years ago?" On
the FBI studies involving serial killers, twins, facial recognition, and
genetics
Twins Days Double Take
Parade (Racket
News Photo)
By Ryan
Lovelace
April 1, 2026
Racket News
(Substack)
“You’re only
going to create a real problem for an FBI employee if you call ‘em direct this
way.”
Senior FBI official Thomas Gregory Motta was upset that I
dared to call him to talk about the bureau’s hidden experiments on humans.
He joined the bureau in 1998 and was promoted
to the FBI’s senior ranks nearly 20 years ago. During his tenure, the bureau
has grown proficient at snooping on journalists — as documented in a secret
government report published
by Racket — without having to face their questions.
Motta is a decorated FBI veteran, credited with an
intelligence community award
in 2007 for modernizing the American government’s most important
foreign espionage tool and having worked on the secretive “going
dark” national surveillance program.
After internal criticism surfaced more than a decade ago
involving the bureau’s experiments on humans, the FBI put Motta in charge of an
internal team revamping
its approach to human subjects research.
In 2023, Motta delivered a presentation detailing the
government’s work on secret human experiments, going all the way back to a
catastrophic project that saw a CIA scientist drugged with LSD plunging
to his death from a hotel room window 70 years earlier.
The government labeled his presentation, “NOT AUTHORIZED FOR
POSTING ON THE INTERNET.” Here is Motta’s presentation to the Public
Responsibility in Medicine and Research conference, posted on Racket in
full, with only Motta’s personal information removed:
DOWNLOAD
LINK TO PDF: “Institutional Review Board (IRB) For Human Subject Research
(HSR) Protection” - Fbi Human Subject Research Presentation (22-pages)
Among the types of human experiments undertaken by the FBI,
as detailed by Motta, are research involving facial recognition studies and
algorithm testing, genetics, violent extremism, interrogation science, and
more.
What is the bureau’s “oldest, continuous human subject
research project?” It involves killers, namely the “Serial Homicide Interviews
of Incarcerated Offenders” that Motta captioned with a photo of celebrated
fictional monster Hannibal Lecter, as played by Anthony Hopkins in Silence
of the Lambs.
Screengrab Photo from PDF (Racket
News Photo)
The psychological thriller depicts a young FBI trainee,
actress Jodie Foster as Clarice Starling, trying to get inside the head of the
cannibalistic killer, Hopkins’ Dr. Hannibal Lecter.
Motta led the Institutional Review Board for Human Subject
Research Protection to oversee such studies at the FBI. In 2023, the secretive
unit was moved under the auspices of the “Next Generation Technology Lawful
Access Section.”
Motta told me he is no longer the chairman of the board,
“not even at liberty to give the name of the chair” overseeing research now,
and he said he “probably wouldn’t” speak to me if I approached him formally
through the bureau’s press office.
He did not speak with me again and the FBI declined to
answer all questions about the bureau’s human experiments. It also rejected Racket’s
formal requests to interview those involved with experiments upon Americans.
We found some of the Americans the FBI is studying anyway:
identical twins.
The FBI’s decades-long experiments on twins dwarf the
scope of deadly Nazi studies
Throughout human history, twins have been the subject of
intense interest for outlandish experiments on humans.
The German Nazis’ deadly human experiments researching
genetics ensnared approximately 3,000
twins, 1,500 pairs of people, during the 1940s, according to the
Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiments Survivors.
Fewer than 200 children are estimated to have survived,
according to an investigation into the twins of Auschwitz authored
in 1992.
In America, a major gathering of twins occurs every year,
and the FBI looks to take advantage of the large pool of potential test
subjects who consent to its experiments.
The Twins Day Festival in Twinsburg, Ohio, annually attracts
nearly 2,500 sets of twins, or close to 5,000 people, according to the FBI’s
Criminal Justice Information Services Division 2025 Year in Review.
The FBI’s
review said it has sponsored the West Virginia University Twins Day
Biometric Collection since 2010, involving those twins who voluntarily
participate.
“This collaboration has resulted in the CJIS Division
housing a vast dataset of twins’ biometrics with the only known twin
age-progression dataset,” the review said. “The FBI uses the dataset to test
its own capabilities to accurately identify individuals.”
One twin who grew suspicious of the FBI’s experiments at the
Twins Day Festival’s 50th annual gathering in 2025 posted
a video to TikTok showing some of the experiments underway.
The festival’s nondescript research sign did not carry the
FBI’s insignia but it was adorned with bright red flags:
Bitchute/Rumble
VIDEO: FBI at 2025 Twins Day Festival
[Posted by SlantRight2/SlantRight
Published April 3, 2026]
JoJo Gentry, a twin who has attended the festival for more
than 20 years and participated in its human experimentation, told Racket
she understood West Virginia University was conducting research with the FBI
and signed consent forms.
But Gentry, a former sports anchor who now oversees a
multimedia production company,
said she is not so sure other twins read the fine print.
She said the research participants are typically hanging out
while standing in line, enjoying the rare opportunity to meet other identical
twins from near and far.
“You’re standing outside, it’s a hot summer day and you
typically have ice cream while you’re waiting so usually your attention is just
drawn to whoever is around you and having a conversation before you greet the
people, whoever are at the front of the survey area,” Gentry said. “And they
say, ‘Hi,’ and it’s brief, and say, ‘Sign this paperwork,’ and you sign it and
you go in [and] say, ‘Here’s your 50 bucks,’ and you leave.”
Gentry said she and her sister gave saliva samples when they
were younger.
“We thought extra money was cool and with an accreditation,
with a higher education university and some corporations that were present. We
felt like whatever they were offering was legitimate,” Gentry said. “And, of
course, they had friendly faces there.”
Gentry said she has found the data collection process
transparent, though she has some lingering questions.
“I’ve learned a little bit about what the government does
and how it processes information so I’m like, ‘Oh, who has my saliva from 10
years ago?” Gentry said.
It’s an important question and a difficult one to answer.
Data collected at Twins Day is “beneficial to other government agencies,
trusted partners, and academic institutions,” according to the FBI’s CJIS 2025
Year in Review.
The identities of the other agencies and trusted partners
are not clear. In March, FBI Director Kash Patel said
on X the bureau, “expanded biometric collection overseas with
foreign partners” to thwart bad guys, also without revealing the partners
working with the U.S. government.
Biometric data from identical twins collected by the FBI
goes into the CJIS’ Data Analysis Support Laboratory, according to a 2024
Privacy Impact Assessment.
“The multi-year dataset of identical twins’ biometrics in
DASL enables the FBI to conduct various biometric algorithm evaluations,” the
privacy assessment said. “Tests conducted using this data confirmed that
fingerprints and iris biometrics are truly unique.”
Humans knowingly experimented upon by the FBI may expect
more fulsome information about how the FBI is using their biometric data.
Motta’s 2023 presentation said human subjects must have the right to opt out of
future uses of their data and the scope of the future uses must be described to
the test subjects.
Screengrab Photo from PDF
(2) [Racket
News Photo]
The FBI’s 2024 privacy assessment said the biometric data
and personally identifiable information gathered in its lab will not be shared
externally, “except when the FBI shares sanitized—that is,
pseudonymized—biometric data from the [Next Generation Identification] System
with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.”
Sanitized, pseudonymized, and anonymous no longer mean
hidden, however.
Motta’s 2023 presentation said biometrics such as
fingerprints, facial images, and DNA are not truly anonymizable, and artificial
intelligence is complicating things further.
“AI is challenging the assumptions of anonymity in big data
sets,” Motta’s presentation said.
The FBI’s security is also far from best-in-class. U.S.
investigators reportedly suspect China
of breaching an FBI computer network holding domestic surveillance orders,
while Iran-linked hackers appear
to be behind a breach of FBI Director Kash Patel’s personal emails that spilled
online in March.
The FBI’s human experiments present a risky proposition for
both the test subjects and those working in labs.
Motta’s 2023 presentation included a warning that said those
who fail to get prior approval from his board before conducting such human
research may be stuck with the blame and the financial burden if things go
haywire.
“You could, in theory, be on your own if non-IRB-reviewed
research creates financial liability,” Motta’s presentation said.
The emergence of data about the FBI’s human experimentation
is just the latest in a series of leaks and revelations describing secret
programs run by the FBI and other agencies that seem far from normal
enforcement. From off-books “prohibited
access” investigations to political
surveillance
to the buying
of personal data like geolocation, Americans are increasingly subject to the
same bizarre tactics intelligence agencies have deployed abroad or contracted
out to other countries. What else is being hidden?
© 2026 Matt Taibbi
Racket News HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT
Racket News
+++++++++++++++++++
From MK‑Ultra to TikTok: How the FBI
Turned America Into an 80‑Year Human Experiment in Behavior
Control
FBI Human Experimentation
Continuum (Patriots Of Faith Hope Love Channel Photo [From
X])
By Tony Seruga (from
X)
April 2, 2026 6:06pm
Telegram Patriots Of Faith Hope Love
Channel
It's bad. It's really, really bad! ☠️
For nearly eight decades, the FBI has occupied a quiet but
critical place in the U.S. government’s covert history of human experimentation
— not as a laboratory operator, but as the domestic enforcer and later data‑controller
of programs that blurred the line between psychological research and social
control.
The story begins in the 1940s, when Operation Paperclip
imported wartime scientists whose “behavioral defense” research seeded CIA and
FBI interest in manipulating minds rather than merely gathering intelligence.
Through the 1950s and 60s, the CIA’s MK‑Ultra
and its sister projects experimented with LSD, hypnosis, and trauma to probe
human compliance, while the FBI safeguarded the secrecy of these projects,
tracking exposed subjects and silencing leaks.
When public outrage forced the CIA underground, the Bureau
stepped to the front with COINTELPRO, turning psychological warfare into
domestic policy.
Civil rights leaders, anti‑war activists, and intellectuals
became involuntary participants in field experiments measuring how
misinformation, surveillance, and constant pressure could fracture identity and
morale.
After congressional investigations exposed these programs in
the 1970s, Washington promised reform. Instead, the experiments were rebranded.
The newly minted Behavioral Science Unit at Quantico continued studying
manipulation, now under the respectable banner of “criminal profiling.” By the
1980s and 1990s, advances in electromagnetic and non‑lethal
technologies blended psychology with engineering, creating the next frontier of
“compliance research.”
FBI participation in DoD’s directed‑energy
testing signaled the fusion of biophysics and behavioral science — invisible influence instead
of interrogation.
In the 21st century, the entire apparatus migrated online.
Under post‑9/11 counterterrorism authorities, the Bureau began
feeding massive civilian datasets into AI systems funded by DARPA and IARPA.
Programs like Behavioral Sentiment Correlation Analytics and
Applied Behavioral Influence Operations tested predictive algorithms able to
sense, model, and nudge human emotion in real time. What began as Cold‑War
hypnosis evolved into algorithmic conditioning — a seamless, 24‑hour experiment conducted through
social media feeds, biometric data, and digital surveillance.
Declassified records and FOIA logs corroborate every phase
of this metamorphosis: original MK‑Ultra memoranda, COINTELPRO field
directives, Behavioral Science Unit research papers, and more recent entries
describing “neuroresponse” and “human domain analytics.”
Each stage shows identical DNA — experimentation first
justified by national security, sanitized by new terminology, and perpetuated
through the fusion of intelligence agencies, defense contractors, and big
data. The human body gave way to the
human algorithm, yet the same pattern endures: consent absent, accountability
nonexistent, secrecy absolute.
Today, the architecture of mass behavioral influence
operates seamlessly behind the interfaces of phones, search engines, and social
platforms. While officials claim these are protective counter‑extremism
tools, their lineage reveals something darker — a civilization‑scale experiment measuring how far
perception can be engineered before people even realize they’re subjects in a test.
Tony Seruga on
X
.jpg)
