Islam is an Antichrist Spirit AGAINST Christianity

AND THEREFORE an Enemy of American Principles of Liberty and Once-Upon-A-Time Christian Western Civilization

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© March 11, 2026

 

Thanks to El Gato Weebee’s Wordpress Blog from 3/10/26, I watched his Bitchute Video “BRITAIN'S FUTURE...OR SHOULD I SAY EUROPE'S?”. The video is 4:59-Minutes mocking Disney’s Beauty & the Beast (I think) lyrics which are altered to reflect how the UK protects Islam to the point that the once Great Britain is transforming into a British Caliphate.

In the United Kingdom if you protest or condemn Islam, you can actually go to jail. If you share truths about Islam in a negative light, the police will knock on your door with a fine or an arrest.

 

In the UK (and most of Europe), pointing out the evils of Islam especially as insidious against the Christian and Judaic faith, is labeled hate speech and a hate crime because it might incite Muslims to respond in violence. AND GOSH! The UK and EU has imported loads of Christian-hating and Jew-hating Muslim immigrants that has been transforming their Christian-Western Culture.

 

Consider these headlines:

 

o   Britain’s rape jihad: Maverick billionaire Elon Musk takes on British PM Sir Keir Starmer over mass rape by Grooming Gangs led by Pakistan-legacy criminals. Woke is under attack; By Ravi Shankar; New Indian Express; 1/11/25 5:30 pm

 

o   When the Left Controls a Judiciary, Dissent Means Incarceration: Ask Tommy Robinson; By John Houk; John’s Newsletter; 5/28/25

 

o   U.K.: Don’t You Dare Criticize Islam; By Abigail Anthony; National Review; 6/25/25 6:30 AM

 

o   UK under Siege: 11 incidents exposing alarming Islamisation threat from 2000-2025: The United Kingdom is witnessing a profound societal shift, marked by the increasing influence of Islamic practices and a growing demographic transformation. These evolving dynamics are raising significant questions about the future of British identity and social cohesion; By WEBDESK; ORGANISER; 8/4/25 08:00 pm IST

 

o   Waving British and Israeli flags: Tens of thousands attend anti-immigration march in London: Over 100,000 protesters packed into the streets south of the River Thames, before heading towards Westminster, the seat of the UK parliament; By REUTERS; The Jerusalem Post; 9/13/25 16:23 UPDATED 9/13/25 18:46

 

o   UK Legalizes Muslims Stabbing People If They’re Offended: “You were clearly deeply offended.”; By Daniel Greenfield; FrontPage Magazine; 10/1/25

 

With this tip of the iceberg background, here is El Gato Weebee’s satirical video on the UK evolving into a Muslim Caliphate:

 

Bitchute VIDEO: BRITAIN'S FUTURE...OR SHOULD I SAY EUROPE'S?

Posted by ElGato_Weebee

Published March 9, 2026

 

AN ANIMATED MUSICAL SHORT ABOUT THE COMING BRITISH CALIPHATE

 

The UK and European Islamic issue is beginning to creep into the USA. Fortunately, the First Amendment of the Constitution prevents labeling criticism of Islam as a hate speech crime. The American Left and Islamic radicals in the USA have gone to great lengths to chip away America’s First Amendment Free Speech Rights.

 

Communism and Islam are two sides of the same Antichrist spirit coin determined to decimate Christianity. The resurging spread of these two ideologies is an indication the Last Days is around the corner.

 

⁹ The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, ¹⁰ and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. ¹¹ And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, ¹² that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. -- 2 Thessalonians 2: 9-12 (NKJV)

 

More SIGNS of the Last Days/End Times: 10 Signs We Are in the End Times

 

The Substack version of Act For America has a great 3/10/26 post illustrating the American battle against Islamic Sharia-creep.

 

JRH 3/11/26

ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income. Diana & I endorse Magic Functional Coffee. It’s MAGIC because there is a weight loss or weight control emphasis among other wellbeing benefits.  Clicking the Diana Wellness Store will take you to the online store. CLICK the BUY tab and/or JOIN tab. Joining means you get COFFEE discount, can operate your store and recruit your own business & customers. Decide on a level to enter to Network your own Store. DRINK COFFEE and/or MAKE MONEY!:

 

https://dianawellnessstore.com

Have Coffee Customer Question or Earn Money Question - Ask Diana at Facebook Group Good Life Coffee

 

*****************************

The Sharia-Free America Caucus is Growing

 

By Act for America

March 10, 2026

Substack Act For America

 

The tide is turning in our relentless battle to safeguard the very foundations of our great nation. We told you about the creation of the Sharia-Free America Caucus. We brought you their latest press conference. Now, the Sharia-Free America Caucus in Congress has just welcomed its 47th member! Co-founded by the unyielding champions of freedom, Reps. Chip Roy and Keith Self of Texas, this powerhouse group is expanding faster than ever, drawing in courageous leaders who refuse to let foreign ideologies erode our American way of life.

 

The latest warrior to join the ranks is none other than Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, a fierce defender of our values who recognizes the clear and present danger. This isn’t just another addition—it’s a thunderous statement that more and more representatives are waking up to the threat. The caucus—composed of members from 22 states—stands as a bulwark, committed to preserving our culture, our freedoms, and our Constitution against an ideology that has already poisoned nations across Europe, turning once-vibrant societies into shadows of their former selves. We’ve seen it happen: countries like the UK and France grappling with parallel legal systems, where Sharia courts operate in the shadows, undermining national sovereignty and equality under the law. We cannot—must not—let that darkness take root here in the United States.

SHARIA-FREE AMERICA CAUCUS (Act For America Photo)

 

And speaking of triumphs, let’s tip our hats to Texas. Proposition 10 just sailed through with an astounding 95% GOP primary voter approval, calling for the outright banning of Sharia law in the Lone Star State. The message from Republican voters could not be more clear. As Rep. Keith Self so powerfully declared, “Texans stand for America, not Sharia.”

 

In a world where complacency invites invasion, it’s refreshing to see states like Texas stepping up, drawing a line in the sand, and saying “not on our watch.” Texas Republican primary voters didn’t just vote to send a message; they roared their commitment to the principles that make America exceptional: liberty, justice, and equality for all.

 

But why is this fight so urgent? Why must we rally against Sharia with every fiber of our being? Let’s be crystal clear: Sharia isn’t just a set of religious guidelines—it’s an archaic belief system that clashes head-on with our Constitution and the freedoms we hold dear. Under Sharia, women are treated as second-class citizens. Women face stoning for “adultery” or flogging for defying dress codes. It’s a system that crushes free speech, punishing blasphemy or criticism of Islam with death, silencing dissent and fostering fear. This isn’t progress; it’s a regression to medieval brutality that has no place in a modern, democratic society.

 

Europe’s cautionary tale is unfolding before our eyes. If we allow even a foothold here, we risk the same fate: our courts compromised, our schools indoctrinated, our communities divided. Sharia isn’t compatible with America—it’s antithetical to it. It seeks to impose a theocratic rule that overrides our Bill of Rights, turning the land of the free into a land of submission.

 

Take a stand. Donate to ACT for America today!

 

That’s why ACT for America is sounding the alarm and calling on every state legislature to form their own Sharia-Free Caucuses without delay. Imagine it: 50 state caucuses united in this cause, each one fighting to legislatively fortify against this encroaching threat. From Florida’s sunny shores to California’s bustling cities, we need leaders with foresight and fortitude. We’ve seen what happens when we ignore the warning signs—entire civilizations crumble.

 

The momentum is with us. The Sharia-Free America Caucus’s growth in Congress is proof that Americans are ready to fight back. Click “ACT NOW” below to contact your state legislators, demand the creation of state-level Sharia-Free caucuses, and let’s ensure that America remains a beacon of freedom, not a casualty of complacency.

 

Together, we will prevail—for our children, our Constitution, and our country!

 

© 2026 Act for America Education

Act For America HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Act For America

American Patriots Should be Wary of Left-Wing AI Models

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© March 9, 2026

 

For those conditioned to believe Artificial Intelligence (AI) are benign tools that solely benefit our human existence, YOU need to think or follow the money involved in maintaining most AI models.

 

Most AI models are the product of Big Tech. AND Big Tech is dominated by Left-Wing and Globalist ideology. THAT ideology is inimical to American Liberty, American Sovereignty, and hateful of anything that has made America Great.

 

There are some stories that Big Tech is abandoning the Left in favor of Conservatives in government (e.g., HERE & HERE). I do not buy that line. It is my opinion some in Big Tech are flirting with President Trump for government subsidies more than exchanging their Leftist Stripes for Conservative Stripes. I suspect once President Trump is no longer in Office, the Leftist Stripes will stand out.

 

Jordan Schachtel posting at Substack The Dossier on 2/26/26 examines an inherent Left-Think in AI models. MIT Technology Review in 8/7/23 actually measures the “Liberal” bias in Big Tech AI models.

 

As to Big Tech and Globalism, this Dean Williamson post from 2024 pretty much taps into my concerns:

 

o   AI on The Globalist Agenda: What’s Next for the World in 20 Years? By Dean Williamson; Medium; 9/12/24

 

Below is a cross post from G. Calder at THE EXPOSÉ writing about Left-Wing AI Models.

 

JRH 3/9/26

ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income. Diana & I endorse Magic Functional Coffee. It’s MAGIC because there is a weight loss or weight control emphasis among other wellbeing benefits.  Clicking the Diana Wellness Store will take you to the online store. CLICK the BUY tab and/or JOIN tab. Joining means you get COFFEE discount, can operate your store and recruit your own business & customers. Decide on a level to enter to Network your own Store. DRINK COFFEE and/or MAKE MONEY!:

 

https://dianawellnessstore.com

Have Coffee Customer Question or Earn Money Question - Ask Diana at Facebook Group Good Life Coffee

 

*************************

Why Are All AI Models Left Wing?

By G. Calder

March 8, 2026

THE EXPOSÉ

 

Ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or Llama about immigration, climate policy, welfare, gender ideology, or censorship, and the answers may differ in tone, but the underlying ideology is always the same. Multiple studies now find that leading language models lean left on contested political questions, often favouring progressive social assumptions and more interventionist economic positions. Researchers in Germany found strong alignment with left-wing parties across major models. Another study found instruction-tuned models were generally more left-leaning. A third concluded that larger models often become more politically skewed, not less. That is a serious problem for a technology sold as an impartial guide to information. If the tools increasingly used to explain the world already tilt in one direction, the question is no longer whether bias exists, but how far it shapes what millions of users come to regard as neutral truth.

 

It’s Not Just a Theory Anymore

 

For years, concerns about political bias in AI were brushed aside as anecdotal. That argument has weakened sharply. A 2025 study examining AI-based voting advice tools and large language models ahead of Germany’s federal election found that the models showed strong alignment, averaging more than 75 per cent, with left-wing parties, while their alignment with centre-right parties was below 50 per cent and with right-wing parties around 30 per cent. The authors warned that systems presented as neutral informational tools were in fact producing substantially biased outputs.

 

Another 2025 paper testing popular models against Germany’s Wahl-O-Mat framework reached a similar conclusion. It found a bias towards left-leaning parties and reported that this tendency was most dominant in larger models. The study’s title was blunt enough on its own: Large Means Left.

 

A separate theory-grounded analysis based on 88,110 responses across 11 commercial and open models found that political bias measures can vary by prompt, but that instruction-tuned systems were generally more left-leaning. The important point is not that every model behaves identically. It is that the overall pattern keeps recurring across methods, datasets, and research teams.

POLITICAL COMPASS OF LLM MODELS (The Exposé Photo) Visualising the data on a graph

 

A Disturbing Pattern

 

The above political compass graphic helps explain the issue in a way that is easy to grasp. The horizontal axis measures economic orientation from Left to Right. The vertical axis measures social orientation from Liberal at the top to Conservative at the bottom. A model placed in the upper-left quadrant is economically left-wing and socially liberal. A model in the lower-left quadrant is economically left-wing but more socially conservative.

 

All of the best-known systems, including Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, and Grok, sit on the left-hand side of the graph. Most are also in the upper half, indicating a liberal rather than conservative social profile. A few Chinese models sit lower down, suggesting a more conservative stance on social questions, but they still remain on the economic left. The striking feature is what is missing. There is no comparable cluster of major right-of-centre models.

 

That does not mean every answer from every model is uniformly partisan. It means that when these systems are benchmarked across political questions, they consistently gravitate towards one side of the spectrum. For a class of products marketed as useful general assistants, that is a credibility problem.

 

Why Do They All Lean the Same Way?

 

The first reason is the training material. Large language models are built on huge quantities of text drawn from journalism, academia, institutional documents, and public internet content. Those sources are not ideologically neutral. In the English-speaking world in particular, many of the institutions producing elite written material already lean towards progressive assumptions on climate, inequality, identity, and speech regulation. Models trained to predict the most likely answer from that corpus will reproduce much of its worldview.

 

The second reason is alignment. Models are not simply trained on raw text and released into the wild. They are fine-tuned through safety rules and human feedback. OpenAI itself says political bias can appear not only in explicit policy discussions but also in “subtle bias in framing or emphasis” during ordinary conversations. That admission matters. The slant is not always obvious. It often appears in which arguments are treated as mainstream, which concerns are foregrounded, and which objections are wrapped in caveats.

 

The third reason is that larger models do not appear to solve the problem. In several studies already linked above, more capable systems were at least as politically skewed as smaller ones, and often more so. That cuts against the comforting idea that bias is merely a symptom of immaturity that will disappear as the technology improves.

 

How Can We Trust AI, If They Can’t Remain Neutral?

 

Defenders of the industry often reply that language models do not “believe” anything. In a narrow technical sense that is true. They generate likely sequences of words. But users do not experience them as probability engines. They experience them as explanatory tools. If the explanation of a political issue repeatedly leans in one direction, the user is still being guided, whether or not the software has convictions of its own.

 

That is not just a theoretical concern. A Yale study published this month found that AI chatbots can influence users’ social and political opinions through latent bias, even when they are not explicitly trying to persuade. The researchers warned that people increasingly rely on chatbots for basic factual lookups, which means the framing of those answers matters. Bias does not need to arrive in the form of a slogan. It can arrive through emphasis, omission, and tone.

 

Another paper presented at ACL 2025 found that participants exposed to politically biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions that matched the model’s slant, even when that slant ran against the participant’s own prior partisan identity. The study also found that many users failed to recognise the bias clearly. This is where the problem becomes more than academic. A system widely assumed to be objective can influence people precisely because it does not look like a propagandist.

 

AI is Dangerously Effective

 

AI does not need to lecture users like a party activist to shape public opinion. It only needs to make one set of assumptions feel safer, more enlightened, or more fact-adjacent than the alternatives. That is especially important in education, journalism, search, and workplace software, where these tools increasingly act as intermediaries between people and information. Once the same ideological drift is embedded across multiple platforms, the bias becomes infrastructural.

 

This is what makes the current state of affairs so troubling. The political slant of a newspaper is visible. The slant of a chatbot is often disguised as balance. When several of the world’s most powerful AI products all lean in the same direction, public debate is no longer being filtered only by editors, broadcasters, and universities. It is also being filtered by machine systems built from the same institutional worldview.

 

Can AI Political Bias Be Fixed?

 

Research suggests the bias can be mitigated, at least to some degree. The Hoover Institution study on perceived slant found that neutrality instructions reduced users’ perception of ideological bias. OpenAI says it is trying to measure political bias more realistically in live conversational settings rather than relying on simplistic tests. Those are useful steps, but they also confirm the basic point. If firms are spending time measuring and reducing political slant, they know the slant is real.

 

The larger obstacle may be cultural rather than technical. An industry convinced that its own values are merely common sense is unlikely to notice how often those values are being smuggled into “helpful” answers. That is the cynical core of the issue. The leftward tilt of AI may not be the result of a grand conspiracy. It may be the more familiar problem of institutional self-belief, scaled up into software and then sold back to the public as intelligence.

 

Final Thought

 

The more evidence accumulates, the less plausible it becomes to dismiss concerns about AI’s ideological slant as a culture-war fantasy. Multiple studies, across different methods and countries, have found that leading models lean in a progressive direction, particularly on polarised issues. Researchers have also shown that these biases can influence users, often without being clearly recognised.

 

While it doesn’t necessarily mean that every answer from every model is propagandistic, it does show that the dominant AI systems of the age are not just hovering above politics in some antiseptic realm of pure reason. They are products of institutions, training sets, incentives, and alignment choices that repeatedly point in the same direction. If these tools are to become trusted civic instruments rather than ideological tutors in a polite machine voice, that reality will have to be confronted rather than denied.

 

THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE

SUPPORT THE EXPOSÉ