Friday, July 29, 2011

Breivik’s Christian Revolution

Nazi Iron Cross

John R. Houk
© July 29, 2011

An Anti-Christian atheist dear one commented on a post I sent to Facebook. The post is entitled, “New York Times reader kills dozens in Norway”. The SlantRight posting is actually an Ann Coulter piece using her political wit to point out that Anders Breivik wrote of more resources than Biblical Christians and Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist bloggers. The Anti-Christian dear on was quite antagonistic which forced me to spend more time than I really wished to examining a 1500 page manuscript by terrorist Anders Breivik.

Below are the initial interchanges between the dear one and I which is then followed by my assertions relating to Anders Breivik. (Note that comment section posts are rarely accomplished with grammar and spelling in mind. I usually edit such comments when I repost them but I thought it better not to do so out of anxiety that I may change dear one’s intent.)

Dear one: You neocons can spin and twist all you want. The facts are that he is a Christian, opposed Islam and multiculturalism and killed many people. His rant in his 1500 page diatribe sounds like a compilation of a lot of your posts on Islam. You are associated, like it or not.

John Houk: Dear one you need to re-check your facts! Even though the sicko Breivik may have appreciated Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist American writers and Western culture derived from a Christian past, his actions as a terrorist are far removed from bloggers and Christians. Bloggers expose the dark side of Islam to alert people in the West the Anti-Liberty nature of Islam. Breivik’s self-identification as a Christian must also be seen in the context of his self-identifications in his 1500 page manuscript; e.g. Christian Atheist and Christian Agnostic to name a mere couple. Those terms may be a few oxymorons you are more acquainted with. It is the LEFT doing the spinning not any proud Neocon, Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist blogger or Christian!

Dear one: He wan't (sic) an atheist John. Christian atheist is an oxymoron. He believed he was a knight of god sent to bring Europe back to it's cultural christian roots, which is ironic because it wasn't until the expanse of the roman empire di(d) Christianity gain a foothold.

Dear one: One retort to your misstatement of facts above: He didn't claim to be a christian atheist or christian agnostic. He said that people who are those two are welcome to join the fight to restore christian cultural values. Please don't misrepresent the facts.

Dear one I did not misrepresent the facts! I may not have been precise; however upon a quick perusal of the Breivik manuscript my thoughts are indeed vindicated. Even though the sicko Breivik may have appreciated Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist American writers and Western culture derived from a Christian past, his actions as a terrorist are far removed from bloggers and Christians. Bloggers expose the dark side of Islam to alert people in the West the Anti-Liberty nature of Islam. Breivik’s self-identification as a Christian must also be seen in the context of his self-identifications in his 1500 page manuscript; e.g. Christian Atheist and Christian Agnostic to name a mere couple. Those terms may be a few oxymorons that you are more acquainted with. It is the LEFT doing the spinning not any proud Neocon, Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist blogger or Christian!

Is Breivik an atheist? You are correct in this justification.

Is Breivik a Christian? Your assertion is not justified. As I did point out “Christian atheist” is indeed an oxymoron; nevertheless that was Breivik’s phrase for an atheist that respected the roots of Western Culture which is Christianity.

Breivik DID NOT believe he was a knight sent from God in the sense of the Knights Templar of old. Breivik believes he is … READ THE REST AT 

SlantRight Editor: The original site is under an archive status. If the owner of the servers continues in a censorship mode he may remove the archives completely. Due to this possibility I am adding the from the "Brevik DID NOT ..." spot through to the end. This update: 6/13/12

Breivik DID NOT believe he was a knight sent from God in the sense of the Knights Templar of old. Breivik believes he is a European tasked to raise the consciousness of Europeans to the darkness in Islam by revolutionary means. By revolutionary I mean armed tactics against European governments and institutions. The irony is it seems to be the same modus operandi that Islamic terrorists employ that have a global Caliphate in mind. Breivik implies that the people will rise against the status quo of Left Wing multiculturalism which accepts diversity rather than their national culture. Purist Muslims (Salafists, Wahhabi, Ikhwan, Deobandi, etc.) especially of the al Qaeda type believe attacks on Western institutions of power or Muslims in Islamic nations that might support the status quo of dictatorships or secular leanings will cause the Ummah (community of the people) to rise up and unify all Muslims to reinstitute Mohammed’s program of bringing Islam to the world.

According to my brief scanning (rather than detailed) of the 1500 page manuscript the violence is not aimed at Muslims but rather toward non-Muslims to cause chaos amongst European governments. The ultimate goal is to establish a secular-Christian culture that will then begin expelling Muslims from the European continent back to Muslim dominated lands. Then Breivik leaves the door open to handle the Middle East after Europe is secure.

Breivik’s new Templars are to be modeled after the Teutonic Knights (German) and what he calls Odinism which is an incorporation of the old Norse Gods. Norse mythic-religion is hardly a part of the Christian faith. Breivik’s Christian-Odinism is no more Christian than is Santeria and Voodoo which incorporates Catholicism in its syncretism. Christian-Odinism is a syncretic combination much as Santeria and Voodoo are. All three religions are condemned as pagan. If a pagan calls himself a Christian it does not make that person a Christian.

Breivik is no fan of Protestantism. He is a fan of Roman Catholicism; however Breivik believes a radical reformation of the Catholic Church needs to occur to eradicate political correctness in order for the Catholic Church to have some cajones to defend the faith from incursions from non-Christian cultures, specifically with Islam in mind.

Here is some of Anders Breivik’s thinking from his 1500 page pdf manuscript entitled, “2083: A European Declaration of War.” [SlantRight Editor: I lost the link to the version I originally downloaded, hence the reference pages below will be a little off from this link provided.]

3.139 Distinguishing between cultural Christendom and religious Christendom – reforming our suicidal Church

A majority of so called agnostics and atheists in Europe are cultural conservative Christians without even knowing it. So what is the difference between cultural Christians and religious Christians?

If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and Go then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social, identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian. (SlantRight Emphasis)

A majority of Christians, especially liberal, humanist Christians oppose the doctrines of self defence. I believe that self defence is a central part of Christianity as documented in another part of this book. The modern day pacifist Christianity is among other things a result four current regimes and their deliberate influence of the Church. They castrated and made the Church impotent and irrelevant, we will rejuvenate it by implementing our own reforms. But pragmatism will be the basis for which direction we chose to go. A strong church (on certain areas) is essential for the unity of our European countries. (p. 1297)

… The pacifistic/suicidal Christians must never be allowed to dominate the church again which one of the reasons why I personally believe that the protestant Church in Europe should once again should reform to become Catholic (Nordic countries, the UK, Germany, Benelux etc.). Re-introduction of cultural and Church aspects relating to honour should be the core of our objective when reforming the Church. My hope is that the future must nationalist leadership in Western European countries will agree. … The Church must not put any limits whatsoever on issues relating to science, research and development. Europe will continue to be the world’s center for research and development in all areas, strengthened by a predictable and “unchangeable” cultural framework. This again will considerably strengthen European and societal cohesion and therefore contribute to sustainable societies where harmony, progress, freedom and the furtherance of mankind are the primary civilisational pillars. (p. 1298)

Q: If you were to coin a word for the ideology or movement you represent, what would it be?

Cultural conservatism or a nationalist/conservative direction know as the Vienna school of thought [SlantRight Editor: AKA Austrian School of Thought which is basically Laissez-Faire economics and has been influential with Libertarian economics and political theory. Uh-oh, perhaps Libertarians are a huge influence on the Breivik massacre]. As for the political movement; I would describe it as a National Resistance Movement, an Indigenous Rights Movement or perhaps a Conservative Revolutionary Movement. [SlantRight Editor: Links added by me]

… The primary factors that unites us is that we are all nationalists, anti-Marxist, anti-Islam(isation), we support indigenous rights and we are revolutionary, willing to martyr ourselves. [SlantRight: Emphasis Mine] (p. 1343)

Q: Can significant indirect damage against civilians be justified?

Yes and no. It can be justified in the sense that it is the only pragmatical way to move forward. When someone blows up a government building it is obviously not with the intention to kill the cleaning lady or the janitor. The target has been selected after careful consideration because it will yield the wanted results.

Innocent people will die, in the thousands. But it is still better than the alternative; million of dead Europeans, which the worst case phase 3 scenario.

Q: What about atheists and Odinists, can they join the PCCTS, Knights Templar?

If you want to fight for the cross and die under the “cross of the martyrs” it’s required that you are a practising Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist (cultural Christian). The cultural factors are more important than your personal relationship with God, Jesus or the holy spirit. Even Odinists can fight with us or by our side as brothers in this fight as long as they accept the founding principles of PCCTS, Knights Templar and agree to fight under the cross of the martyrs. The essence of our struggle is to defeat the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe before the we are completely overwhelmed by Muslims.

I have studied Norse Mythology and have a lot of respect for the Odinist traditions. I consider myself to be a Christian, but Odinism is still and will always be an important part of my culture and identity.

Q: Is it likely that Odinists will support the cause of the PCCTS, Knights Templar, considering the fact that many of them hate Christendom?

A: F
irst of all, as a Norwegian, I am extremely proud of my Odinistic/Norse heritage as it is an essential aspect of my culture and my identity. However, things aren’t black and white. Supporting the Christian cultural heritage does not automatically mean you hate Odinism or vice versa. There are pragmatical considerations Odinists have to evaluate as well. Do they really believe the symbolism of Mjöllnir (Thors hammer) has the potential to unite the Nordic peoples against the forces we are facing? Do they really believe Odinistic symbolism would be more suitable compared to the uniting force of Christendom’s symbolism and that of the cross? Anyone with half a brain will … (p. 1349)

As a cultural Christian, I believe Christendom is essential for cultural reasons. After all, Christianity is the ONLY cultural platform that can unite all Europeans, which will be needed in the coming period during the third expulsion of the Muslims.

… As for secularism, are there any strong uniting symbols at all? I think not. In representing your culture. In this context, the cross is the unrivalled as it is the most potent European symbol. I have had this discussion with many Odinists, and even they understand this.

Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?

As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus. Being a Christian can mean many things;

    - That you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage.

The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structure included), our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity – Protestantism, Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and the legacy of the European enlightenment (reason is the primary source and legitimacy for authority).

… It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “Christian fundamental theocracy” (everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want).

So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or Christian-atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)). (p. 1350)

The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation but rather a Christian “cultural” military order. [SlantRight Emphasis] (p. 1351)

Yeah I know this is a large amount of quoted material for a blog post, yet considering Breivik’s manuscript is 1500 plus pages I believe I did justice with the discussion between me and my Anti-Christian atheistic friend.

Included in the 1500 page document is a minor autobiography. In his bio Breivik alludes to connections with Skin Heads and Neo-Nazis in his youth. He writes that in growing up one of his closest friends was a Muslim with a Pakistani heritage. His friend had an identity crisis and began to hang around Muslims more and more because of the isolation he was feeling from Norwegian nationals. Ultimately Breivik’s friend abandoned him for his Muslim family. Breivik attempts to nonchalant the divide between himself and his Muslim friend; however I could tell from the reading it was not an appreciated choice that was made by his Muslim friend.

Breivik describes youthful gang activity that included both Muslim and Norwegian gangs. He relates a story of how some Muslim gangs intimidated some Norwegian gals (if memory serves correctly, it might have been a guy). The Norwegian youth gang tracked down the Muslim gang with an implied can of whup-ass being delivered to the point that a gang deal was reached for gang borders. You can see the hate beginning here.

Breivik then makes friends with Skinheads and Neo-Nazi youths which he asserts were more into being social bad-boys than politics.

I personally believe his autobiography to this point; however from this point onward the account of his life seems a bit stretched. He describes joining a transnational European Knights Templar. Breivik’s invitation to join in a leadership capacity gave him the honor of being among the youngest in association. Evidently Breivik’s Knights Templar are a secretive lot laying the ground work that will begin the revolution to bring down the current ruling elites of Europe and then begin to deport Muslims.

I don’t know about you but there seems to be some parallels of how Adolf Hitler actually rose to power in Germany. This is not to say that Breivik is anywhere close to Hitler’s position of rising because Breivik is now in jail awaiting prosecution which will either send him to prison or to the nut house. Prison was a period of time that Hitler used to write his Nazi manual entitled Mein Kampf. Hitler laid out his thoughts on the racial superiority of the Germanic people compared to other races. Then Hitler laid out his thoughts about races and/or people he considered subhuman and a stain to the racial purity Hitler envisioned. In Hitler’s eyes the biggest racial stain were the Jews. Thus a final solution must be placed into action to get rid of the Jews from Germany or any land controlled by the Third Reich. The Final Solution led to the Holocaust in which Six Million Jews were slaughtered along with about Six Million non-Jews that Hitler also considered a racial stain.

I quickly thumbed through Breivik’s manuscript and I did not notice any a Final Solution to terminate Muslims. Breivik does write about stages or phases that involving deporting Muslims. I did not read the framework of those phases; however I am certain the Jews were told they were to be deported only to discover Concentration Camps and extermination chambers.

Breivik’s Knights Templar is a next level Nazi Party. Instead of establishing the superiority of the German people, Breivik establishes Western Culture as it has been derived from its Christian roots as superior to those who practice Islam. It is a bit more difficult to brand Muslims as a race as the Jews had by Hitler. Islam is designed to be attractive on a multiracial basis of conversion while Judaism is rather insular and stand-offish toward non-Jews. This is especially the case of Orthodox Jews in being separate from non-Jews.

It is obvious that Breivik’s “Christendom” superiority complex is largely based that Muslims living in Europe are from Asia, Middle East and Africa (although most Muslims live in Indonesia).

So let’s recap my dear one’s assertions toward Ann Coulter’s article:

Dear one: He wan't (sic) an atheist John. Christian atheist is an oxymoron. He believed he was a knight of god sent to bring Europe back to it's cultural christian roots, which is ironic because it wasn't until the expanse of the roman empire di(d) Christianity gain a foothold.

Breivik is not an atheist; however he is not what one would call a Christian that worships ONLY the oneness of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Breivik stipulates he is not religious and is proud of Nordic heritage which includes the religiosity of Odinism which is pagan worship. Breivik is all about brainwashing Europeans with symbols he believes will bring a cohesion to Europeans in general. Breivik chooses Christian symbolism merely because it is more ubiquitous than regional nationalistic symbols (e.g. Odinism) or ideologies based on race (e.g. Nazism). I am fairly confident in saying for Breivik that Christian symbolism holds the most importance as a European unifier; however other symbolism such as from Odinism, Nazism or the old Roman Empire can be inculcated into Breivik’s vision of Cultural Christian primacy if the inculcation means the expulsion of Muslims from Europe.

Dear one: One retort to your misstatement of facts above: He didn't claim to be a christian atheist or christian agnostic. He said that people who are those two are welcome to join the fight to restore christian cultural values. Please don't misrepresent the facts.

Let’s examine how awful my misstatement is. Here is Breivik qualifying those who can join the revolution to change European society:

If you want to fight for the cross and die under the “cross of the martyrs” it’s required that you are a practising Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist (cultural Christian). The cultural factors are more important than your personal relationship with God, Jesus or the holy spirit.

Breivik says a Christian Atheist is a Cultural Christian. Now here is Breivik specifically identifying the kind of Christian he is:

As a cultural Christian, I believe Christendom is essential for cultural reasons.

That specifically reads that Anders Breivik considers himself a “Christian Atheist”.

JRH 7/29/11

Thursday, July 28, 2011

New York Times reader kills dozens in Norway

Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter nails Leftists in the media as well as Leftists in general that have deceptively associated Anders Breivik with Bible believing Christians and Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist writers in America. Coulter takes aim at the big dog of newspaper rags the New York Times. BREIVIK WAS NO BIBLE BELIEVING CHRISTIAN!

JRH 7/28/11

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Breivik Massacres because of Islam

Anders Behring Breivik as assassin

It’s Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist Bloggers Fault?
John R. Houk
© July 26, 2011

Anders Behring Breivik is a name that will go down in history as the craziest or wickedest or both of men in history. Breivik may also go down in history as the individual icon that Leftists and Muslim apologists will utilize to condemn anti-jihadist and anti-islamist writers and bloggers as racist inciters of murder and massacres.

Breivik went on a murder spree in which the media at first told the world there were 93 victims. The victim count has continued to shrink since the original senseless murder of his fellow Norwegians. The last count I read was 76.

I have to be honest with you. I only heard of this act of terrorism in blips and pieces without paying attention. I simply presumed European Muslims went psycho again. Then I received an email from Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for America expressing her horror with the unmistakable certainty that she condemned this act of perfidy by Breivik. This is when I began to surf the Net for a bit more detail clarity.

At this moment I only knew the perpetrator was a Norwegian. So, I Googled “Norwegian terrorist” and Breivik’s name came up soon enough. As I was preparing to type his name to perhaps bring up more info on Breivik I noticed something disturbing. I noticed the MSM was associating Breivik as a Right Wing Christian fanatic that hates Muslims. I continued on to Google the terrorist’s full name.

Yep, there was no doubt. Breivik was heavily into anti-Islamic thinking to the level of hatred. He did not really identify with the Christian faith as much as he did with the civilization that has emerged from Christianity.

The Google listings made it clear that media organizations on both sides of the pond were going out of their way to blame American anti-Jihad/anti-Islamist bloggers for Breivik’s murder spree. Frankly this includes yours truly.

Breivik wrote a 1500 page manuscript of which some may have been plagiarized from actual Right Wing terrorists such as the Unabomber. The Left Wing Slanted ThinkProgress posted some rather pointed thoughts gleaned by Lee Fang.

… Many of the leading Islamophobes who inspired Breivik have also been responsible for a rising tide of hate campaigns, from the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” hysteria to a disturbing trend of demonstrations against Muslim Americans across the country:

– Breivik cites neoconservative Islamophobe Frank Gaffney on opposition to Turkey joining the EU, and reprints a post from Gaffney’s think tank, the Center for Security Policy: Gaffney, a former Reagan official, is a regular on Fox News, a writer for the Washington Times op-ed page, a sought-after speaker at major conservative conferences, and a ubiquitous talking head on talk radio. His think tank created a website to orchestrate protests against the the (sic) so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” in Manhattan. When he is not arguing that President Obama is a secret agent of the Muslim Brotherhood or claiming that radical Muslims have infiltrated the top levels of American government, he is calling for people who practice Islam to be prosecuted under sedition laws.

– Breivik cites blogger Pamella (sic) Geller several times in his manifesto, reprints articles praising her: Geller, the writer behind the popular anti-Muslim blog Atlas Shrugs, has been perhaps the most proactive anti-Muslim activist, given the fact she was the first to smear the planned Park51 community center as a “victory mosque” and was involved in demonstrations against the construction before most of the media gained an interest. As Geller travels the country promoting her belief that Muslims are an inherent threat to American society, she has been connected to protests against mosques in California, Tennessee, and other states.

– Breivik posts a 45-minute interview with Brigitte Gabriel, a leading organizer of grassroots anti-Muslim activism: Gabriel is the author of several popular anti-Muslim books, is the founder of ACT! For America, a group Gabriel created to engineer a permanent activism base for efforts to scapegoat Muslim Americans. Her group has collaborated with Tea Party groups, pushed bans on Sharia law in states, and mobilized a vicious hate rally in Orange County earlier this year. In an interview with ThinkProgress, Gabriel confessed that she regularly advises Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Peter King (R-NY).

– Breivik extensively quotes Robert Spencer, a leading anti-Muslim writer sponsored by David Horowitz: Spencer’s blog Jihad Watch, along with Geller’s site (Spencer and Geller created the group “Stop Islamization of America” to distribute action alerts), have driven anti-Muslim memes in the news for years. Sponsored by David Horowitz’s think tank, Jihad Watch has led efforts to purge the Republican Party of Muslim Americans and is a constant purveyor of strange anti-Muslim claims, like one recently that former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) had secretly converted to Islam. Despite his links to Holocaust deniers and other unsavory individuals, Spencer provides punditry for Fox News, National Review, and other top conservative media organs. ThinkProgress has found his books sold at CPAC, the College Republican conference, and events for Young Americans for Freedom.

– Breivik linked ten times to video clips for the movie Obsession, a documentary created by a secretive group called the Clarion Fund: In 2008, a mysterious organization called the Clarion Fund mailed the documentary Obsession to 28 million households in swing states leading up to the election. The movie argues that Muslims are waging a war against America, and will stop at nothing to destroy western civilization. Clarion has subsequently produced more films, which are distributed and publicized widely by Geller, Gabriel, Spencer and other leading anti-Muslim activists. The group is chaired by a number of prominent Islamophobes, including Gaffney and Daniel Pipes.

Lee Fang’s tone has become the norm of the Left oriented MSM and Leftist bloggers in general. Fang included a dozen or so resource links in the excerpt I used above to strengthen his position on we wicked Islamophobes – you will have to go ThinkProgress to check out Fang’s sources. Breivik’s murder spree is going to become an excuse to vilify anti-jihadist/anti-Islamist bloggers as racist spewers of hate. I am surprised Fang did not include Dutch MP Geert Wilders that had just won a free speech issue in Netherlands for the right to speak the truth about Islam in Documentary, writing and in public.

In Europe Breivik’s massacre quite possibly will reverse the success of Wilders’ victory in Court. Some Leftists are comparing the incident to the plight of Muslims in the West.

That plight goes something like this: The amount of Muslims that are violent calling for Jihad against Westerners, Americans, Christians and Jews is a small minority of Muslims. It is unfair to blame all Muslims as violent because a fraction of Muslims are violent.

The Leftist bloggers and writers trying to sound above the fray has pointed out that Breivik is not representative of Christianity and that this should be a wake-up call by the West – Americans in particular – to not look with disdain upon Islam when only a handful of Muslim preach and act out violent Jihad.

I have read in places that the percentage of Muslims that are radicalized is roughly 7% to 10%. For the sake of argument let’s go with 7% as radicalized Muslims. According to a Pew study released on 1/27/11 the Muslim population in 2010 was 1.6 billion. Seven percent of 1.6 billion is 112 million (112,000,000). That is a lot of people willing to act out violently to perpetuate the purist Islamic agenda of Mohammed in spreading Islam violently.

There are about 2.26 billion Christians (2009) in the World with about 235 million Christians in the USA (CIA World Fact Book: 75% Christian of 313,232,000 U.S. population). Of those 235 million Christians how many can be labeled as Christian Extremists that promote or act out violence to turn the world to Christianity? In full disclosure Google did not cooperate in finding those percentages or numbers of Christian Extremists. Perhaps I did not input the key correct words in my search. What I did find was a bit disheartening.

In my efforts to find statistics on Christian Extremism I found many links pointing to Breivik with denunciations of Christians who dislike Islam in general. The next thing I discovered is that many Christians and Christian organizations that stand for Biblical Morality and Family Values were lumped into the same groups as White Supremacists, Aryan Nation, Christian Nationalism or any group that would deem themselves affiliated to Christianity but promote the use of violence to bring about an American or global transformation based on the hate of those labeled as “the other” in thinking, believing or racial lines.

A classic example of this one group fits all mentality is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC has gone out of its way to label Pro-Life groups and Family Values groups as hate groups because they stand for Biblical Morality; e.g. abortion is murder or homosexuality is a sin. Adding fuel to the fire the SPLC is beginning to attack Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist bloggers as bigoted racist hating Islamophobes while ignoring the prominence of Jew-hatred in a significant amount of American-Mosques and American-Islamic organizations that promote themselves as moderate Muslims. I am not talking about defending Islamic religion as something that is threatening to life and limb of Muslims. Rather the typical literature is placing the old Czarist Russian propaganda tool of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as a fact that Jews are conspiring to bring the entire world under Jewish hegemony. Hello! Jews as a faith are an insular group as far as Orthodoxy goes. These guys want to live in their parcel of land serving the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob while being left alone. There is no desire to conquer to spread Judaism. Orthodox Jews in the West pretty much keep to themselves making an effort to be separate from non-Jews. Now this insular-inclusivity may not be the same among Jews which are Conservative, Reformed or Jews proud of their heritage and yet not religious whatsoever.
If I was a Muslim wishing to expose the nature of Christianity according to the Bible I would be saying something like, “Beware of those Christians that make a man a son of Allah and have elevated him to a position co-equal with Allah. That man was stolen from our Quran and plagiarized as Prophet Jesus. They claim Prophet Jesus died on a Cross and came back alive bodily three days later. We Muslims know that Prophet Jesus never died on a Cross and lived a full life teaching the ways of merciful Allah. Those Christian fellas will tell you there Allahs but some all three are mysteriously on Allah. And yada yada and yada yada.”

This would be Muslim exposing the difference between Christian theology and Islamic theology. However, you will not read such an exposé contrasting one truth as better than another.

Anti-Jihadist/Anti-Islamist will take texts from the Quran, Hadith and Sira and expound in context on how those holy words are there because Mohammed was the example to follow to spread Islam not only as a superior truth but to force others to accept the superiority of Allah and his Prophet Mohammed with a rigor that is still honored today – IN THE PRESENT – that require denial of human rights if Islam is insulted or dishonored according an evolving Sharia Law derived from Islamic jurists over the centuries. Friends, that apple Sharia Law has not rolled too far from the medieval concepts of rights and justice amended by an Arab reformer known as Mohammed. Let’s be honest though Mohammed did great things to reform a lot of practices that were not cool in Arabic culture. On the other hand Mohammed used religion to indoctrinate followers into believing they were operating in the will of a deity to war, collect booty, slaves and turn the conquered into people without rights as they were indoctrinated into the cult of Islam. Those that converted to Islam discovered a better life. Those that chose loyalty to their old faith continued in abject drudgery which included a tax for alleged protection. Does anyone ever ask, “Protection from what?” Surely the protection was not needed from the Religion of Peace, right?

A Muslim apologist will usually obfuscate the text of Quran, Hadith and Sira by taking Old Testament acts of violence ordered by God for Jews to come and claim their Promised Land. Let’s say those years were violent and atrocious which the Jews did at the command of God. Jews ended the genocidal conquest after the Land was conquered which was not completed incidentally. How does that compare to the Islamic call for perpetual Jihad until the whole earth is Islamic.

Ok the whole point is that Breivik is a murderer that needs to be punished, but to blame Anti-Jihadist/Anti-Islamic bloggers is ludicrous. Breivik at best is demented and at worst insane. I mean the guy became hate-filled. His hate may have grown after reading the expositions of bloggers, but the bloggers that are serious about truth in no way incited Breivik to kill around 70 people at an island camp that were not even Muslim. If this was a film the disclaimer can read: No Muslims were harmed in this movie.

JRH 7/26/11
The Norway terrorist

By Brigitte Gabriel
Sent: 7/25/2011 4:35 PM
Sent by ACT for America

We in ACT! for America join those around the world who are shocked and deeply saddened by the mass murder spree in Norway. We grieve for those killed, for their families, and for their friends.

This touches me very personally. I have seen friends murdered by terrorists and I have felt the unspeakable pain of that loss.

We also join those around the world who condemn, in the strongest words possible, the unconscionable actions of Anders Behring Breivik.

Not surprisingly, Brevik’s 1,500 page manifesto is being combed for clues as to why he would perpetrate such a heinous act of terrorism.

For instance, a
New York Times article states Breivik was “deeply influenced by a small group of American bloggers and writers who have warned for years about the threat from Islam…” He also frequently quoted the Unabomber.

Predictably, and sadly, there are those who have started the drumbeat that rhetoric critical of radical Islam is the cause of this tragedy. We have seen ludicrous online posts conjuring up comparisons to Breivik and conservative American political leaders that I won’t dignify by reprinting here.

This is reminiscent of what happened after the Tucson shooting spree, when many in the press jumped to conclusions that Jared Loughner was a “right winger” or a “tea party activist.”

column by Mark Tapson
in FrontPageMagazine has some very important points in this regard.

Breivik is a terrorist. His targeting of helpless schoolchildren makes him no better than the slaughterers at Beslan…. There is no connection between the legitimate, courageous, lawful work of notable anti-jihadists and such evil. No true Christian, conservative, or responsible critic of jihad would condone Breivik’s despicable, cowardly acts or deem them to be in accordance with our beliefs and values. Much less would we celebrate those acts, unlike our Islamist counterparts.

In my home country of Lebanon I saw first-hand what happens when terrorism and violence is used to undermine democracy. When 9/11 happened, I made a vow that I would not allow what happened to my country of birth happen to my adopted country.

This is why the mission of the organization I founded, ACT! for America, has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be a call to constructive, peaceful and democratic citizen action through education, community action, and legislation.

Always devoted,

Brigitte Gabriel
Ideologically-driven illogic

Sent by ACT for America
Sent: 7/26/2011 1:18 PM

The ideologically-driven illogic of New York Times columnist Roger Cohen

New York Times columnist Roger Cohen exceeded all of our expectations in his remarkably illogical column below (SlantRight Editor: Not included in this post) entitled “Breivik and His Enablers.” Space does not permit a detailed analysis of what he wrote, but here are the high points.

1.  He uses the phrase “racist Islamophobia,” and just to be sure we don’t miss the point, he later writes of “anti-Muslim racism.” As Cohen surely knows, Islam isn’t a “race” any more than Christianity is. But playing the race card to demonize those with whom you disagree has become standard operating procedure for people like Cohen.

2.  He foolishly and falsely compares Breivik’s illusions of creating a new Knights Templar order to the call for the restoration of the caliphate by Osama bin Laden. The problem for Cohen, however, is that there is a global Islamist movement for the restoration of the caliphate, led by the Muslim Brotherhood. As far as we know, there is no worldwide movement to resurrect the Crusades.

3.  Cohen calls Rep. Peter King and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich “ideological fellow travelers” of Breivik. King’s “crime,” of course, is to have the audacity to hold congressional hearings investigating Islamic radicalization in America. Cohen can’t just disagree with King’s actions; he has to demonize King by calling him a “fellow traveler” with a maniacal mass murdering terrorist.

4.  Cohen writes, “Muslims have not done enough…to denounce those who deformed their religion in the name of jihadist murder.” For Cohen to claim that the practice of violent jihad is a deformation of Islamic doctrine betrays an astonishing ignorance of that doctrine as well as its history.

We would suggest, for starters, that Cohen read the history behind why Thomas Jefferson purchased a Koran. (The short answer is that he wanted to understand why the Barbary Pirates were engaging in what they called “jihad” against Americans.) He could then move on to Andrew Bostom’s The Legacy of Jihad.

No doubt we will see more of the ideologically-driven illogic displayed in Cohen’s column. The reason is simple: the apologists for radical Islam cannot defend the facts about radical Islam, so their only play is to attempt to silence anyone who exposes the truth. This includes the shameful exploitation of a horrendous tragedy in Norway.
Breivik Massacres because of Islam
John R. Houk
© July 26, 2011

The Norway terrorist – and - Ideologically-driven illogic

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure. 

Sunday, July 24, 2011

The New York Homosexual Mafia

Ruben Diaz - NY Assembly Senate

John R. Houk
© July 24, 2011

Not long ago the State of New York joined five other States in the Union making the ungodly act of same-sex marriage as part of the law of the land. The sadness about this reprobate law is that it could have easily been defeated.

The Republicans hold a two seat advantage in the Senate of the New York Assembly meaning the GOP is the majority Party. According to Senate Assembly rules the Majority Leader can prevent any bill from an up and down vote on the Senate Floor. The Senate majority Leader Dean Skelos failed in Christian morality by allowing such a sinful Bill to come to the Floor for a vote.

The next failure was that some Republicans defected from family values and voted with Democrats to pass the Bill.

The irony of the legal depravity in New York was the primary anti-same-sex Senator was a liberal Democrat from South Bronx. Senator Ruben Diaz is also a Pentecostal Minister and actually did his part in promoting Christians to bus into Albany to show their support for traditional marriage. How a Pentecostal Preacher can be a liberal Democrat boggles my mind but God bless him for being more vocal than Republicans who are supposed to represent family values.

The Senate passed the Marriage Equality Depravity Act 2011 with a 33-29 vote. Of the 29 nays Senator Ruben Diaz was the only Democrat. The votes that brought homosexual validation to the State of New York were Republicans:

·       James Alesi

·       Mark Grisanti

·       Roy MacDonald

·       Stephen Saland

Even this Marriage Equality Depravity Act passed and was signed by Governor Cuomo five minutes before midnight on June 24th. Senator Diaz became the recipient of some of the most vile hate mail (mostly email) using prolific negative metaphors and even death threats. I am guessing the homosexuals that demand tolerance for their depraved lifestyle are not so tolerant of a Christian voting to the values of Christianity as espoused in God’s Holy Word.

Senator Diaz writes about this in a press release from his website:

Unashamed To Be A Christian
By Senator Reverend Ruben Diaz
July 7, 2011

On June 24th I voted my conscience and opposed Governor Andrew Cuomo's key piece of social legislation in the New York State Senate that redefines our marriage laws away from the traditional definition of one man and one woman. I was the only Democrat in the Senate to vote against this legislation, and I wear my vote as a badge of honor.

I have been congratulated by religious leaders and constituents not only from my district, but from districts all over New York State. I have received messages of encouragement and gratitude from people throughout the United States. Alberto Martinez tweeted: "Jesus said: 'Whoever is ashamed of Him and His words, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of such person at His coming.' Bravo Senator Diaz." All of these supporters know that I am unashamed to be a Christian. If we talk the talk, we must walk the walk.

Although Republican Senate Leader Dean Skelos ushered the gay marriage vote to the floor in order to make the 11:00PM news, and even though the vote passed, the hatred that has spewed in my direction before June 24th continues.

Yesterday I received a series of five emails in my Senate account from one person that read like homicidal rantings: "You eat shit. You are shit." "There is no worse person on Earth than you. God has told me so." "You worthless pile of human excrement!!!" "I hope you die! I hope you die soon! I'm waiting for you to die!" "Satan would sooner nail a stake through your heart than admit to knowing you. Your very own lover!!!"

To err on the side of caution and especially since one of the messages awaits my demise, those emails were properly reported to the FBI.

Those messages suggest that even though the gay marriage vote passed, that author did not get what he wanted which suggests to me that for some reason, I am the embodiment of his disappointment.  He may also be upset because I am unashamed of my vote.

Last Tuesday, a website posted an article titled: "Sen. Ruben Douchebag: I Made History." The tag labels that follow that online piece are as vulgar as possible. I quote them here not to amplify their vulgarity, but to let people know the ever-growing hatred freely expressed by those who claim to promote tolerance: "assholery, batshittery, bigotry, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, douchenozzles, evil, and f***weasels".

I am amazed that the author of that site continues to fixate on me as he does. I was told that he even tweeted about me just one hour after the supposed May 21 rapture: "An hour past #Rapture in New York City and this town is still infested with Sen. Ruben Diaz and his filthy ilk. #Disappointed."

For all intents and purposes I am a stranger to this person, yet for some reason I have his full attention. As a religious leader I thank the Lord that he continues to pay attention to my efforts to spread the Word of God. I hope and pray that since he seems to be a grown man, he will try to no longer promote vulgarity, indecency and hatred online or elsewhere.

After the June 24 vote, so many people who disguise themselves as victims and decry bullies hide behind their computer screens and demonstrate what is called "keyboard courage" by posting hateful and vicious comments about me.

In the great spirit of interfaith unity I will continue to work to promote what the late Pope John Paul II called the Culture of Life and continue to highlight the actions of the opposition which is still not pleased even with their declared victory in New York against traditional marriage.

For my part, I will continue to be unashamed to be a Christian.

The homosexual lobby used threats and strong tactics to smash their same-sex depravity law through the New York Assembly and to Governor Cuomo’s pen. I guess one can call this the tactics of homosexual mafia.

Here is a rather lengthy description of the process that has brought shame to New York that you probably did not read in the Mainstream Media that has been brainwashing Americans to accept the homosexual lifestyle.

JRH 7/24/11 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)

Friday, July 22, 2011

Let’s Help Geller Beat Lawfare

Pamela Geller lg

John R. Houk
© July 22, 2011

Remember how Rifqa Bary’s purist Muslim (i.e. Radical Islamic) parents tried to force their 16 year old daughter home after she fled for her life to Florida? Rifqa had converted to Christianity in Ohio and was found out by the family. In essence apostacizing in Islam according to the Quran and Hadith is reason enough for a death sentence. Rifqa feared she would be the victim of an honor killing so she departed with the help of a charismatic Church in Florida.

This is where things got a little thorny in the legal realm.

Once Mo Bary found out where her daughter was he proceeded with legal measures to extradite her from Florida back to Ohio proclaiming all the time that his precious baby-girl, (by now) 17 year old Rifqa had nothing to fear from her crazy – err – doting parents.

Pamela Geller continuously kept Rifqa in the news with her blogging efforts. Geller is a renowned anti-jihadist and anti-Islamist blogger. Geller receives vitriol from Leftists and Muslim apologists much like Ann Coulter does with her anti-Left Conservative humor. Geller is a hero by showing no fear to the violence and legal jihad that flows toward people who take a stand against the evil portions of the Quran, Hadith, Sira and Sharia Law.

Rifqa stuck to her guns and claimed her father had accosted her prior to fleeing to Florida. One thing Rifqa feared was if she was returned to her parents that they would ship off to Sri Lanka. The Bary’s were legal resident aliens. If Rifqa was sent back to Sri Lanka she felt the honor killing would be carried out there.

Rifqa managed to stay free from her Parents in Ohio by being remanded to juvenile detention until a Judge could decide her fate. The stall tactic worked for as soon as Rifqa turned 18 she applied for her own resident status which was granted. Wisely Rifqa Bary has drifted from the public eye to continue to evade the threat of an honor killing.

So why do I rehash this legal victory for Rifqa Bary?

Bary’s lawyer in Ohio sued Pamela Geller for her part in keeping Rifqa free. Attorney Omar Tarazi is claiming defamation. Tarazi is taking the stand that his connections with CAIR does not he has a connection with Islamic terrorists. The suit against Geller is for 10 MILLION bucks.

Pamela Geller and is becoming a victim of Legal Jihad or what call Lawfare. The lawyer(s) handling the Bary’s side has had connections to CAIR. CAIR is the certified unindicted co-defendant from the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) case in which key HLF people were found guilty of funneling money to Hamas the Islamic terrorist organization representing the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza (Gazastan-Hamastan).

As pointed out by Julia Gorin writing for Political Mavens: Are we going to allow Geller to fight this legal battle alone? Dear God in Heaven I pray not! Geller has a pro-bono lawyer; nonetheless legal costs arise and the money has to come from somewhere. If you are one wishing to take a stand against Islamic Lawfare you have to truly consider donating some dough to Geller’s Defense to overcome her being buried by moneyed lawyers that will keep legal motions going to bankrupt Geller and her lawyer with legal fees perhaps without even losing the case to the Bary family.

JRH 7/22/11 (Hat Tip: Grendel Report)