John R. Houk
© April 7, 2012
Here is an essay by Bill Warner that focuses on morons that are apologists for Islam. The morons are Christian, Jews and cults that have roots in Christianity. What is the common denominator of these Christians, Jews and cults? In social values they are secular humanists and moral relativists. In other words they are liberals. I prefer calling liberals Leftists; in the case of religion that may or may not be appropriate. In the case of Christians, the Liberals have chosen to downgrade the Word of God to something lower than cultural relativity. Liberal Christians have twisted the Scriptures to justify Liberal social values to the point many even deny the Divinity of Christ or for that matter deny the central point of Redemption; i.e. the death, burial and RESURRECTION of Jesus Christ in Glorified body form sitting at the right hand of Father ever interceding for the Saints (Protestant perspective: Believers in Jesus Christ the Son of God).
As Warner points out these Judeo-Christian Liberals will call you a bigot and hater for attempting to tell you the dark side of Islam, this is especially the case in being Pro-Israel. These Liberal Christians, Jews and cult Christians are among the leaders of pushing an agenda of promoting businesses, corporations, Churches and Synagogues to divest their investments if such brings profit to Israel. Why? The reasoning is these Liberals have been convinced that Israel is an evil nation that persecutes and removes Civil Rights from the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians.
To read Bill Warner you have to become familiar with the term dhimmi or dhimmitude. Here is a crash course on dhimmitude gleaned from Bat Ye’or that has made this a scholarly study exposing what kind of life a dhimmi lived under as a second class citizen in Islamic lands:
Islamic law, the shari'a, provides "protection" and security for the People of the Book - the Bible; it is indeed a basic theological principle. However, Muslim theologians and jurists attached so many conditions and humiliations to this real protection that the status of the protected Jews and Christians - the dhimmis - soon became a status of oppression, deprivation and insecurity.
This status was regulated by several laws that bound them within a social pattern of discriminations and insecurity. Instead of "Islamic tolerance," or of "toleration," I have called this vast political, religious and cultural world - from Arabia to Spain and the Balkans, including for some time, part of Hungary and Poland - the realm of "dhimmitude," from the Arabic word dhimma: a treaty of submission for those peoples conquered by jihad. The laws that were applied to the dhimmis, I have called the laws of "dhimmitude," and the special type of civilization that dhimmis developed, I have call the civilization of dhimmitude.
The civilization of dhimmitude is based on two main elements: jihad - that is, a compulsory religious war of conquest that brings non-Muslim lands into the realm of Islam; and the subjugation of its native populations. In other words, the choice is between perpetual war or submission. The civilization of dhimmitude developed in the context of subjugation and insecurity. Its main features were the payment of the jizya, a koranic tribute that became a poll-tax. For early Muslim jurists, the jizya had two purposes: to enrich the umma, the Islamic community; and a symbolic meaning: it suspended the jihad threat, which was death, slavery or the expulsion of non-Muslims. The payment of the jizya procured for the dhimmi the security for his life, his family and his personal possessions. One important aspect of dhimmitude is the principle of the dhimmi's inferiority to Muslims in every walk of life. This civilization of dhimmitude expanded on three continents, representing millions of peoples. Over the centuries, populations and entire civilizations disappeared, or barely survived. The civilization of dhimmitude is composed of numerous ethnic groups, mainly Christian, and rival Eastern Churches. Documentation abound, and a few sources may be found in my books.
The civilization of dhimmitude is based on the principle of "protection," which is the security for life and property pledged by a Muslim ruler to non-Muslims, who are subjected to certain conditions - tribute money, or as a temporary protection (aman). This concept implies that the right to security of life and property are denied to non-Muslims and are only granted by the Muslim community according to its own conditions. In other words, the principle of natural rights for all human beings is denied. The civilization of dhimmitude is engendered by wars and conquest. (Persecution of Jews and Christians Testimony vs. Silence; from lecture by Bat Ye’or; 4/2/1998; Dhimmitude.org)
Now you are ready for Bill Warner’s “Partners in Crime”.
JRH 5/7/12
****************************
Partners in Crime
By Bill Warner
April 6, 2012
First published in American Thinke
The Islamic Society of North American (ISNA) is an organization linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. ISNA was an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terror financing trial ever held. If you go to the ISNA website you find a very interesting list called the Partners of ISNA. Here is a partial list of church Partners:
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Presbyterian Church (USA)
The Union for Reform Judaism
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
United Methodist Church
Unitarian Universalist Association
How do these Partners of ISNA work? They work very hard serving Mohammed and Allah. Their first job is to be ignorant of Islamic doctrine. The Partners never show the slightest sign of knowledge about Islam, except to parrot what their Muslim “handlers” tell them.
To assure this ignorance is passed down to the next generation, the Partners use their schools to train the next generation to be as ignorant as they are. In other words, their schools never teach how Christians were dhimmis (semi-slaves) inside of Islam, even in those mythical days of the Islamic Golden Age. The schools of the Partners never teach the Islamic doctrine of the Christians and Jew. There is no Jew hatred in the Partners version of Islam, in spite of Islamic doctrine being more filled with Jew hatred than Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
The Partners never bring up the murder of Christians and Jews to their ISNA masters. When ISNA puts up a condemnation of murder of Christians in Nigeria on their website that is enough for them. They never get around to asking why these murders of Christians has happened for 1400 years and why there will be a one this week.
The Partners never bring up the murder of Christians and Jews to their ISNA masters. When ISNA puts up a condemnation of murder of Christians in Nigeria on their website that is enough for them. They never get around to asking why these murders of Christians has happened for 1400 years and why there will be a one this week.
Instead, the Partners are content to believe the stories of how Islam honors Isa (the Jesus of the Koran) and loves the People of the Book (one of the names for Christians and Jews). Of course, the fact that Isa lacks every quality of Jesus as found in the Gospels never troubles a Partner, since the Partners honor their oath of subservience to Islam and do not read the Koran.
The Jewish Partners are equal in their ignorance when they never mention that the Musa of the Koran is not the Moses of the Torah, in spite of their ISNA masters declarations. Since the Jews are as deliberately ignorant of Islamic doctrine as their Christian Partners they don’t know who the Musa in the Koran is. The willful ignorance of these Christian and Jewish Partners is traitorous.
The banner cry of the Partners is “tolerance”—tolerance of the intolerable. The Partners will tolerate religious genocide, church burnings, rapes, kidnapping, honor killings and lies, as long as they are done by Muslims. The Partners will piously smile when faced with evil, because they are being tolerant.
But there is one thing that that Partners will not tolerate: conversation about the doctrine and history of political Islam. Want to be a bigot? Speak about the suffering of Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and atheists under Islam and down comes the name-calling against those who know and speak out against the evil of Sharia persecution of Kafirs.
Speaking of Sharia, the Partners love it and want it to rule anywhere that ISNA wants. You see, the Partners know that Islam is one of the three great Abrahamic faiths (an Islamic concept that denies both the truth of Christianity and Judaism). They want Islam to practice its religious laws and the Partners want Islam to grow. So when a Christian or Jewish woman approaches a Partner leader and asks if they should marry this nice Muslim man, the Partners insist that that is a wonderful idea. After all, the Partners and Muslims all worship one god. And since the Partners have not the slightest idea of what the Sharia is, they can, in all good ignorance, encourage their sister to marry a Muslim. The fact that the Muslim husband can now follow the Sharia and beat the Christian/Jewish wife is of no concern to a Partner.
The Partners train their congregants to be ignorant so that they can respond like the French Jews in the last murder of Jews by Muslims at Toulouse. These Jews have been well taught how to be ignorant, so that they can say things like: “Why would they do this?”
WHY? Because Allah hates the Jews, Mohammed murdered Jews, raped Jews, enslaved Jews, tortured Jews, and exiled Jews. Hence, in Toulouse, France, a Muslim can murder Jews. It is Sunna. But in the world of Partners, these heinous acts have no explanation, except local politics and poverty. Israel caused it. Right wingers caused it. Anything, except Islam.
Let’s lay our cards on the table. These Partners are Partners in crime, crimes against humanity. These pious wimps are evil themselves, because they curry favor with evil. They willfully practice ignorance, arrogant ignorance, in order to conceal their cowardice. We must call them out, abuse them, and condemn them.
Quotes from religious founders and scholars:
John Wesley, founder of the Methodist church:
John Wesley, founder of the Methodist church:
"Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it...have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.”
Martin Luther, founder of the Lutheran church:
“. . . In the second place, the Turk’s Koran, or creed, teaches him to destroy not only the Christian faith, but also the whole temporal government. His Mohammed, as has been said, commands that ruling is to be done by the sword, and in his Koran the sword is the commonest and noblest work.”
“Since . . . Mohammed’s Koran is such a great spirit of lies that it leaves almost nothing of Christian truth remaining, how could it have any other result than that it should become a great and mighty murderer, with both lies and murders under the show of truth and righteousness.”
Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, Roman Catholic Archbishop:
"Today (1950), the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming hatred against Christianity itself. Although the statesmen have not yet taken it into account, there is still grave danger that the temporal power of Islam may return and, with it, the menace that it may shake off a West which has ceased to be Christian, and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world Power".
John Calvin, father of the Reformed and Presbyterian churches:
“Mahomet has reported himself to be the party that should bring the full revelation – over and besides the Gospel. And by means thereof, they [the Islamic Turks] have utterly become brute beasts.... At this day, we see that those poor beasts busy their heads about as doltish and unsensible things as any can be.
It is very significant that Moslems claim Mohammed is a descendant of Abraham via Ishmael. Yet the Apostle Paul wrote in Galatians 4:22-31 that “Abraham had two sons -- the one [Ishmael] by a slave; the other [Isaac] by a freewoman.... He who was of the slave, was born according to the flesh; but he [who was born] of the freewoman, was [born] according to the promise.
Moses Maimonides, famous 12the Century Jewish Scholar, persecuted in Islamic Spain
“The nation of Ishmael persecutes us severely and devises ways to harm us and to debase us. None has been able to reduce us as they have. We have done as our sages instructed us, bearing the lies and absurdities of Ishmael. We listen but remain silent. In spite of all this, we are not spared from the ferocity of their wickedness and their outbursts at any time. On the contrary, the more we suffer and choose to conciliate them, the more they choose to act belligerently toward us.”
_____________________________
Westerners that become Dhimmis
John R. Houk
© April 7, 2012
____________________________
Partners in Crime
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
© 2007-2012 Political Islam
No comments:
Post a Comment