The Hannity interview I listened to is on YouTube. The video ran the sound track of the Hannity broadcast with a slide show of the Twin Tower attacks which showed Americans jumping to their death resulting from the intense heat of fire in the upper portions of the Towers. Interspersed through the slide show are some factual snippets relating to deaths, the jumpers and the attack. I first found this video at a Jihad Watch post which can be viewed HERE.
Just as a side comment I heard Hannity begin to introduce Gellar as a member of SIOA. He stopped himself short and referenced Geller to her popular blog Atlas Shrugs. I suspect Hannity backtracked on the intro because SIOA stands for Stop Islamization of America. The best place to discover the SIOA agenda is to go to their Facebook page. Really though the name should be self-explanatory. SIOA wishes to prevent the evil aspects of Islam and Sharia Law to gain a foothold of acceptance in America. The reasoning obviously centers around cultural differences: Islam is a theopolitical force that is intolerant to religious freedom, free speech and the basic liberties espoused by the U.S. Constitution.
In essence Islam is diametrically opposed to the American way of Life. All those Leftists concerned about using the “Living Constitution” view of separation of Church and State (which is an inimical interpretation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment) what meet their worst nightmare if Islam and Sharia Law would ever become entrenched in America. Islam demands that the fabric of Community and the fabric of government become one in which the Community submits to an Islamic government (State Established) according to the writ of the Quran, Hadith, Sunna and Sira of Islam. Such a submission would be the termination of free speech, religious liberty, State criticism and many if not most civil rights. The concept of segregation would be reinstituted. The difference being segregation would not be along a racial paradigm; rather segregation would be along a religious paradigm. Which is to say any religions that were permitted to be practiced would forced into a position in which the adherents would be discriminated against including paying higher taxes than Muslims and forced to humble themselves publicly to Muslims.
What are the implications of being humbled in the presence of Muslims?
Non-Muslims would not be allowed civic services that Muslims would be allowed. There would be Muslims only restaurants, rest rooms, motels and so forth. Utilities would be less expensive for Muslims than non-Muslims. Public help (entitlement programs) would be on a Muslim only basis. Only Mosques could be built and only Churches in existence can survive with the added humiliation to get special permission to exact building repairs. In essence all the accomplishments of the Civil Rights Movement in America would be reversed yet with the irony of all non-Muslims (Blacks, Whites, Native Americans, Asians etc.) experiencing all the negative attributes Blacks suffered from the end of the Civil War through the 1960’s.
The disgrace of Islamic Supremacism for America gaining acceptance would relegate Leftists, Secular Humanists, Christians, atheists, Homosexuals, the female gender and all other concepts that might compete with Islam as second class citizens constantly in danger of capital punishment.
Yes it is a worst case scenario, but is it a scenario Americans should allow to begin to go because of our ingrained tolerance for all religions?
In case you were unaware Charlie Daniels is one of those rare superstars of the music industry that is actually a Conservative. I came across a Daniels post in which he takes Leftists and Socialists to task. Daniels especially has raised his ire toward the Leftists now running the American government. When I read Daniels castigation the first thought that came to my mind was a GEICO advertisement that has been shown often on the tube. I caught this image in my mind of Daniels telling President BHO, “That’s how you do it son.”
The Democratic Party answer to Arizona’s law targeting illegal aliens/immigrants is to provide massive amnesty to the law breakers. The result the Dems are looking for are American-Hispanic support at on election. Since ACORN and the Dems have no scruples about registration non-citizens for the vote, it is undoubtedly their desire is to gain millions of voters that have no right to vote in America.
Attorney General Eric Holder was before the House Judiciary Committee. Holder was repeated asked if the event of an attempted car bombing by Islamic Terrorist was an act of radical Islam. Holder circumvented the repeated questions about radical Islam. Holder refused to equate Islamic terrorism in New York City as a symptom of radical Islam.
The video below was sent to me by ACT for America which included a little commentary and a call to wake-up to the radical Islamic agenda globally and in America.
JRH 5/14/10
******************************** Attorney General Tongue-Tied
Sent by: ACT for America Sent: 05/14/2010 10:10 AM
You absolutely MUST watch this 2 minute video, in which our Attorney General is asked if radical Islam “might” have been a factor in the recent spate of homegrown terrorist attacks.
What you will see would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic.
How will we overcome this insanity?
By joining together with the many commonsense Americans who understand what the truth is and what the threat is.
· Join us at our National Conference & Legislative Briefing. To register or find out more please click here. It’s less than seven weeks away! If you’ve been considering registering, please act soon to ensure that you can save 40% on the cost of your hotel room. Our special discounted rate for the Hilton ends May 28th and the discounted rate for the other two hotels ends June 3rd.
· Forward this email to a friend and ask him or her to sign up for our free email alerts.
· Click here to get involved in a local chapter or start a chapter.
By their words and actions we are being warned, again and again, about the intent of radical Islamists. We are witnessing, again and again, the willful blindness of those shackled by political correctness.
If political correctness triumphs in mischaracterizing the threat of radical Islam and global jihad and succeeds in silencing those who speak out against it, even if we stop terrorism we will still lose.
Years from now the next generation will ask us what we did to stand up to the evil of radical Islam and the political correctness that aided its advance. How will each of us respond?
To paraphrase Edmund Burke:
“The only thing necessary for political correctness to triumph is that good men and women do nothing.”
Please don’t sit on the sidelines. Take some action today. You CAN make a difference! _________________________
It is interesting I have read another hypocrisy moment from Arab pseudo-Palestinians in reference to the Jewish faith. The essence of the hypocrisy is that Palestine Authority (PA) peace negotiator has publicly reprimanded Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for making a Biblical reference about Jerusalem at the Knesset (the Israeli version of Congress).
Now here is one example of why it is hypocrisy (I am sure with a little concentrated thought and the old Google search engine, more examples could be found). The existence of al Quds, al Aqsa and other variations of Jerusalem and/or Temple Mount in their Islamic forms is an example of utilizing Islamic symbolism to usurp something that has been Jewish far longer than any Muslim conquest.
For the PA negotiator Saeb Erekat to castigate Netanyahu for making a Biblical reference is the height of hypocrisy that borders on inciting Muslims to riot.
A couple of days ago I posted, “BHO’s Brilliant Political Savvy”. In that post I wrote of a somewhat Machiavellian admiration of President Barack Hussein Obama’s Leftist/homosexual nomination to replace outgoing Justice John Paul Stevens. The admiration I displayed because the information I possessed at the time was that Elena Kagan might be a closet homosexual with some Conservative sympathies.
The more that I have read since that post the more I am convinced that the hint that Kagan has Conservative sympathies is part of a brilliant Leftist disinformation propaganda campaign to persuade Republican Senators an easier out to vote for confirmation for quite possibly the most Leftist/Socialist person ever considered for a life time appointment to the Supreme Court.
To place the Leftist/Socialism of Kagan in perspective, Kagan makes strict constructionist Robert Bork who was denied confirmation by the Democrats to look like a judicial moderate.
Personally I think the Dems will railroad a confirmation of Kagan because of their current majority in the Senate and their already pre-disposed demonstration to run controversial legislation through their House even in the midst of national disapproval polls by American voters. The one thing the Republicans can do in televised Committee hearings is expose the nature of Kagan to the American public that may cause a national outcry from voters who may influence the few centrist Senate Democrats in existence to vote against her confirmation. That’s the best case scenario. Another scenario that is an alternative is to keep in the forefront to the voters both the ramrod legislation of ObamaCare and a Kagan confirmation to SCOTUS.
Ben’s Blog brings a good point concerning the existent of Islam. I also believe Islam is an inherently wicked religion. Mohammed was evil. On the other hand I think the majority of Muslims have bought into "Islam is peaceful."
I believe the Islamic terrorism the world is seeing is actually a reform Islam movement to return to the example of Mohammed to conquer the world with the goal of establishing international Islam, BUT also that there is an agenda to allow some people not to be Islamic in order for a second rate class can exist to collect humiliating taxes designed to produce the image of protection but really is economic slavery designed to keep extortion revenue and a class of people to occasionally blame for woes that are actually the result of Islamic intolerance and dehumanization.
I realize that this is an extra-Quranic extrapolation; nonetheless at the very least Mohammed was interested in acquiring an empire of wealth utilizing his cult of theopolitical Islam as a vice grip to maintain a controlled stability of that which was conquered. It is probably disputable if Mohammed intended economic slavery via humiliation and dehumanization as a control method beyond conversion; however Mohammed’s example became the theopolitical basis for managing conquered areas that fell to Islamic conquest.
Yet the clubhouses of the majority of Muslims blind their eyes to Mohammed's evolving saintliness to crazed bloodthirsty rapist. A majority of Muslims have convinced themselves that the Mohammed of his pre-HijraMecca days is the same persona lasting the rest of his life.
