Rub Salt in the Wound: Reissued

This video from Islam Exposed is more than a remember who perpetuated 9/11. This video is more a - remember the culprits and stand against the NYC approved Cordoba House Mosque (the better name: Ground Zero Mosque).

JRH 9/12/10

Does Islamic Conquest in America begin with Ground Zero Mosque?

John R. Houk
© August 9, 2010

The Cordoba House that seems to be jumping through all the legal hoops to be built in the very shadow of the 9/11 memorial that is a reminder that Islamic terrorism is at war with America could have many names:

• The Terrorist Mosque

• The 9/11 Mosque

• The Twin Towers Mosque

• The Taqiyya Mosque

These are all example names of what the Cordoba House could be called. The predominant name among non-Muslims (we the kafir) is the Ground Zero Mosque. In spite of a huge American outrage nationwide there appears to be an agenda to allow this Islamic defilement to be built next to the two structures destroyed by Islamic terrorist hijackers who murdered over THREE THOUSAND associated as inhabitants of the World Trade Center (WTC or the Twin Towers) and passengers on the hijacked jets.

I wonder what would happen if a group of Christians jumped through Turkish legal hoops (which is extremely doubtful) to build a memorial next to one the most beautiful Churches ever built – Hagias Sophia in Constantinople which was desecrated and turned into a Mosque as the Muslims changed the city’s name to Istanbul? No, that is a bad example for it is another example of Muslim butchery to bring Islam to what was left of the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire.

Perhaps an example could be Christian billionaires (are there any?) buying property in Mecca, Saudi Arabia (again unlikely due to Islamic Supremacism) with the intention of building a bridge of dialogue between Christianity and Islam. O that’s right, it’s a capital crime to bring and read a Bible out loud in Saudi Arabia.

Ben’s Blog brings the wickedness of building a Ground Zero Mosque to light exposing the moronic dhimmitude of Mayor Bloomberg and the deceptive financing of the proposed Mosque. The deception is the money is more than likely coming from Saudi or Islamist billionaires that danced in the streets when 3000 mostly American citizens died at the Islamic terrorist sneak attack of September 11, 2001.

Just a head’s up about my friend Ben. He has a remarkable understanding about the danger of Islam to the American way of life. Although anger draws me close to the type of antipathy Ben has toward Islam, I am not quite on board. It is my feeling that most Muslims fall for the delusion that Islam is peace rather than a theo-political ideology of violence and supremacy toward non-Muslims (i.e. we the kafir). Ben’s call to ban and eradicate Islam sounds a lot like persecuting those deluded Muslims. My thoughts on banning Islam is swearing an oath to the U. S. Constitution while abandoning an ideology to remove constitutional government by force. Such an oath should be given to Marxist/Communists who still believe in extra-Constitutional methods to violently bring about the Leftist utopia (ala Bill Ayers – Obama’s buddy).

JRH 8/9/10

Radical Islamic Ground Zero Mosque

John R. Houk
© July 18, 2010

I received a heads up a few days ago when I was not able to access my email about this article by Alyssa A. Lappen writing for Family Security Matters concerning what anti-Islamists as I call the Ground Zero Mosque and what Muslim propagandists call the Cordoba House.

In case you only watch the liberal Mainstream Media (MSM) a group of radical Muslims are attempting pass themselves off as Muslim moderate pacifists by expressing the desire to build their Cordoba House in the very shadow of what once was the Twin Towers taken down in a radical Islamic terrorist sneak attack declaration of war on the United States of America on September 11, 2010. These radical Muslims call their Islamic program the Cordoba Initiative which makes the claim that they are a Muslim group trying to build an interfaith bridge between Islam and non-Muslim faiths.

The reason Lappen’s article strung a cord in my mind is I listened to Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for America and a blue-eyed American-Muslim convert debate the actual intentions of the Cordoba House. The brief debate was on Sean Hannity’s show of FOX News. Unfortunately for the Muslim apologist both Hannity and Gabriel had the facts of the Cordoba Initiative honcho and every time they would correct the Muslim apologist she would look into the eye of the camera and say the quotes read by Hannity and Gabriel were not true or that famous obfuscation – taken out of context. The funny thing is when Hannity made efforts to read the quotes for the television audience the Muslim apologist would shout Hannity down enough that he could not continue to get past one or two words. So Hannity and Gabriel simply in a nicer way than I would have, called her defense blatantly not true. I would have looked into the camera’s eye and called her bald-faced liar. But I guess all that litigation would follow from the legal jihad if Hannity would have taken my path.

Lappen’s article focuses on “Muslim Pledge for Religious Freedom and Safety from Harm for Former Muslims” and that the Cordoba Initiative Grand Pooh-Bahs Feisal Abdul Rauf and his wife Daisy Khan refused to sign it. Lappen also throws in some Quran and Hadith exposing the Cordoba Initiative and its purist Islamic agenda is to take down the USA by Rauf’s analogies with said Islamic writings and Islamic goals.

JRH 7/18/10

Insensitive Islam and Twin Towers Memorial

John R. Houk
© May 16, 2010

Pamela Gellar and Michael Ghouse were on a Sean Hannity radio program recently debating the merits (or lack thereof) of building a mega-Mosque in the very shadow of the Islamic attack that brought down the Twin Towers and killed thousands of Americas who were the victims of an act jihad.



(Gellar on Huckabee about the Mosque near Twin Towers)

The Hannity interview I listened to is on YouTube. The video ran the sound track of the Hannity broadcast with a slide show of the Twin Tower attacks which showed Americans jumping to their death resulting from the intense heat of fire in the upper portions of the Towers. Interspersed through the slide show are some factual snippets relating to deaths, the jumpers and the attack. I first found this video at a Jihad Watch post which can be viewed HERE.

In the interview Geller effectively counters the deceptive use of Ghouse’s language to justify an Islamic Mosque right next to the emerging Twin Towers memorial.

Just as a side comment I heard Hannity begin to introduce Gellar as a member of SIOA. He stopped himself short and referenced Geller to her popular blog Atlas Shrugs. I suspect Hannity backtracked on the intro because SIOA stands for Stop Islamization of America. The best place to discover the SIOA agenda is to go to their Facebook page. Really though the name should be self-explanatory. SIOA wishes to prevent the evil aspects of Islam and Sharia Law to gain a foothold of acceptance in America. The reasoning obviously centers around cultural differences: Islam is a theopolitical force that is intolerant to religious freedom, free speech and the basic liberties espoused by the U.S. Constitution.

In essence Islam is diametrically opposed to the American way of Life. All those Leftists concerned about using the “Living Constitution” view of separation of Church and State (which is an inimical interpretation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment) what meet their worst nightmare if Islam and Sharia Law would ever become entrenched in America. Islam demands that the fabric of Community and the fabric of government become one in which the Community submits to an Islamic government (State Established) according to the writ of the Quran, Hadith, Sunna and Sira of Islam. Such a submission would be the termination of free speech, religious liberty, State criticism and many if not most civil rights. The concept of segregation would be reinstituted. The difference being segregation would not be along a racial paradigm; rather segregation would be along a religious paradigm. Which is to say any religions that were permitted to be practiced would forced into a position in which the adherents would be discriminated against including paying higher taxes than Muslims and forced to humble themselves publicly to Muslims.

What are the implications of being humbled in the presence of Muslims?

Non-Muslims would not be allowed civic services that Muslims would be allowed. There would be Muslims only restaurants, rest rooms, motels and so forth. Utilities would be less expensive for Muslims than non-Muslims. Public help (entitlement programs) would be on a Muslim only basis. Only Mosques could be built and only Churches in existence can survive with the added humiliation to get special permission to exact building repairs. In essence all the accomplishments of the Civil Rights Movement in America would be reversed yet with the irony of all non-Muslims (Blacks, Whites, Native Americans, Asians etc.) experiencing all the negative attributes Blacks suffered from the end of the Civil War through the 1960’s.

The disgrace of Islamic Supremacism for America gaining acceptance would relegate Leftists, Secular Humanists, Christians, atheists, Homosexuals, the female gender and all other concepts that might compete with Islam as second class citizens constantly in danger of capital punishment.

Yes it is a worst case scenario, but is it a scenario Americans should allow to begin to go because of our ingrained tolerance for all religions?

JRH 5/16/10