The United Nations (UN) has been unjustifiably harsh to the
Jewish State of Israel for decades. The UN has taken up the cause of Muslim
nations that are closer than despotism than a democratic republic process of
governing. As most Americans I am a supporter of Israel’s existence unlike most
Muslims, especially the Muslim Arabs that have adopted the name Palestinian.
The UN hatred of Israel is good enough for me for America to
pull out of the UN and defund our support for that now very crooked
international body. AND YET there are many more reasons for the USA to leave
the UN. Justin Smith goes over some of those reasons in which the UN has an
agenda to fray the sovereign borders of all nations.
JRH 1/18/17
***************
One Step Too Far
Repeal the United Nations Participation Act
By Justin O. Smith
Sent 1/16/2017 7:17 AM
One more day should not pass before the United States
Congress votes to immediately halt all funding to the United Nations and end
our membership in the U.N., largely comprised of our enemies, which falsely
presents itself as an organization dedicated to worldwide freedom, liberty and
"social justice" for all. Not only does the U.N. support terrorism,
it is anti-American and anti-Israeli, and through U.N. schemes, like Agenda
2030 and "sustainable development", the U.N. promotes
tyranny and the subversion of any mechanism for freedom, such as our U.S.
Constitution, thus promoting the suppression of the unalienable rights of all
mankind.
The U.N. claims that it seeks to create a peaceful world and
protect human rights, and yet, many of the world's most troublesome and violent
nations and human rights violators -- Russia, China, Indonesia, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Venezuela and Cuba -- sit on the U.N. Human Rights Council. One
should recall that the United States was removed from the U.N. Human Rights
High Commission in 2001, in retaliation for the U.S.'s defense of Israel, an all-time
high point for U.N. hostility towards the U.S.
U.S. taxpayers' money far too often is placed against
American values and interests, whenever the United States gives it to the U.N.
This occurs because the U.N. majority of votes is held by the undemocratic 57
member nations of the Organization for Islamic Cooperation
(OIC) and the 120 member Non-Aligned Movement, chaired
by Iran from 2012 to 2015. And so, the U.N.'s World Intellectual Property
Organization in Geneva, heavily funded by the U.S., was able to pass dual-use
nuclear technology to Iran and North Korea, without batting an eye.
Did this promote peace? And does arming and supplying Hamas
terrorists promote peace?
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian
Refugees has embedded itself with Hamas terrorists,
who have formed close ties with the Islamic State
over the past two years, and rocket arsenals have been found numerous times in
UNRWA's U.S. funded schools. UNRWA-provided construction materials are used in
Hamas tunnels, which are staging areas for terrorist attacks that kill innocent
Israeli citizens; and, the Leftist Obama administration must tacitly approve of
this Palestinian initiative, since it has sent $380 million annually to the
UNRWA.
In 2011, did the Durban III Conference in New
York and the U.N. legitimization of the Palestinian recognition initiative
promote peace or an OIC agenda?
Shortly after Durban III, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.
John Bolton noted: "You
just don't read about it, you just don't hear about it in the media. But the
pervasiveness of the anti-Zionism and anti-Americanism is there as an
undercurrent -- all the time."
And if the December 23rd, 2016 UN Resolution 2334
is not one step too far for the American people, just how far will we go with
the U.N.'s madness? Not much further, I suspect, especially once one looks at
the U.N. Resolution 16/18, the Small Arms Treaty and Agenda
2030.
With the treason gene dancing nimbly through her mind daily
in December 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton colluded with the 57
Islamic nations of the OIC to abrogate the First Amendment. They met in New
York City to formulate a strategy that would convince the U.S. Senate to ratify
U.N. Resolution 16/18, which criminalizes any criticism of Islam, essentially
criminalizing free speech and a bedrock of our U.S. Constitution and our
American heritage.
The Small Arms Treaty, adopted in April 2013, is another
anti-American U.N. initiative aimed at the Second Amendment. It prohibits
exporting conventional weapons, including personal firearms, to nations with
poor human rights records. Since U.N. officials regularly fabricate "human
rights abuses" against the U.S., this "treaty" would be a strong
nuisance, if applied against us. Registration of all firearm imports down to
the final purchaser is also demanded, which would be used as the next step
towards private firearms confiscation and heavily resisted in America.
The U.N. currently strives to implement Agenda 2030, with
its expected $3 to $5 trillion annual price-tag, and its undisguised plan for
global socialism and fascism [i.e. corporatism]. Goal Ten calls on U.N. members
and every single person worldwide to "reduce inequality within and among
countries", which can only be made possible, according to the U.N., "if
wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed". Basically, this
confiscates Western wealth, shrinks their economies through Big Government
policies and "redistributes" [gives] their money to authoritarian/
totalitarian Third World regimes, rather than their impoverished victims,
keeping the tyrants in power.
Agenda 2030's premise that the world's current rate of
consumption is "unsustainable" is based on fallacies straight out of Malthusian philosophy. The West does not have to reduce
their consumption of everything -- meat, cars, electrical appliances,
convenience foods, air-conditioning, or expansive and modest housing -- as
suggest by U.N. globalists, in order that poor countries can have more and the
world can achieve a "sustainable" balance. All that is required is
keeping the independent spirit of freedom alive that opens the creative and
innovative minds of men, which has always led to a prosperous reality.
Agenda 2030 will be forced on all the citizens of nations
willing to use government coercion. Nowhere does it protect individual rights
and the unalienable rights granted to all men by our Creator. Its 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights'
absolutely denies individuals parental
control over their children and the right to self-defense.
Thankfully, U.N. treaties, including the Vienna Convention
on the Law of Treaties, signed by any U.S. President do not hold any
enforceable weight of law, even through "customary international
law", without the U.S. Senate's imprimatur and a two-thirds majority vote,
contrary to assertions by globalists, American leftists and Obama's State
Department. And even then, the U.S. Constitution cannot be superseded by
international law.
Is it any wonder that former U.S. Representative Ron Paul
(R-Texas) introduced legislation every year he was in Congress to withdraw our
membership in the U.N.?
All Americans, who wish to preserve freedom and liberty for
their children's children and beyond, must eradicate the U.N.'s clear and
present danger to the sovereignty and survival of the United States. We must
fervently urge President Donald Trump and the 115th Congress to totally repeal
the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and expel the U.N. from the United
States completely, releasing the $7.7 billion wasted on the U.N.'s validation
of tyrants for better uses in America. And from this day 'til the end of time,
let America stand only with those nations that are willing to bear any burden
and fight the good fight against any foe to assure that future generations live
in Freedom and Liberty.
By Justin O Smith
_______________
Edited by John R. Houk
Source links are by the
Editor.
© Justin O. Smith
