DONATE

Showing posts with label Expose Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Expose Islam. Show all posts

Saturday, July 8, 2023

Sharing The Sutliffian Report – Sharia is Man Made Law

Posted by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

Moderated by Paul Sutliff

Posted July 8, 2023

 

The live streamed video of The Sutliffian Report on 7/6/23 thankfully begins with Christian affirmations before the actual discussion begins at about the 15-minute mark.

 

THEN Paul Sutliff and the panel embark on discussions on the idiocy of how Sharia handles female menstruation and (LOOK OUT Climate fanatics – farting) using the Muslim handbook “Reliance of the Traveller” comparing other revered Islamic writings such the Quran, Hadith and Sunnah. If it wasn’t so disgusting, it would be humorous.

 

Don’t forget to check out Paul Sutliff authored books. They are available from many online stores, here’s the Amazon version: https://tinyurl.com/mtvn347r

 

Youtube VIDEO: Critical Thinking vs. Shariah Part 19: Shariah is Man Made Law (2:04:33)


 

Posted by The Sutliffian Report

Streamed Live Jul 6, 2023

 

What does it mean when nothing in the Sunnah or the Quran can be found to back shariah? Doesn't that mean shariah is now man made law? Reliance of the Traveller e13.0 to e13.7 shows that man created this part of shariah at the least. We have seen shariah correct Muhammad, now we have shariah using information not shown in the Quran or the Sunnah. Does that mean Islam's claim that Shariah is God's law is a lie?

 

KEYWORDS: Shariah, Critical thinking, Critical thinking vs. shariah, reliance of the traveller, sharia, e13.0, 13.1, 13.2, e13.3 e13.4, e13.5, e13.6 e13.7, Sutliffian Report, Christian Apologetics, Truth about Islam, Facts not Fiction Shariah is man made law, the lies told to Muslims about Shariah, Paul Sutliff,

 

JRH 7/8/23

READER SUPPORTED!

Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!


Saturday, June 10, 2023

Blogger Naughty List, PART FOUR

Censoring the Political Islam Truth


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

June 10, 2023

 

As I type this PART FOUR, I’m sifting going through Blogger’s UNPUBLISHED POSTS for whatever reason they decided in the present to retroactively apply to the long past.

 

PARTS SO FAR:

 

o   PART ONE: Personal Blogging History Leading to the Naughty List

 

o   PART TWO: Abbreviated Censored Posts Directed to CPCR or to ORIGINAL Websites

 

o   PART THREE: Failed to add a subtitle but focused on exposing Islam and exposing Antisemitism

 

I left off at the eleventh unpublished post. AGAIN, these updated censored posts are in the order I received an unpublished notification from Blogger and not in the order of date posted. It is quite clear the Blogger censors have been examining the EXPOSE ISLAM posts informing we non-Muslims. AND so far the Blogger examinations have been looking at the Bill Warner cross posts from Political Islam.

 

12. An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, Part 10

June 2008

Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/06/ethical-basis-for-war-against-political_14.html

NCCR/CPCR Link: https://oneway2day.com/2008/06/15/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-10/

 

Photo: DHIMMITUDE - NO THANKS


 

Here is another dose of “An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam[Updated Link] by the Political Islam [Updated Link] website.

Bill Warner is a little terse in this essay. I would even say it might border on hate speech; indeed I know Mohammedans will consider this essay hate speech.

Warner targets Islam specifically as the enemy of all non-Muslims of all races, creeds, religions and political spectrums.

I preface this warning of hate speech because I have to tell you, Warner is correct of the nature of Islam whether Mohammedan practitioners view Mohammedanism as a spiritual faith or a death cult to violently over take the world with Mohammed’s vision of political conquest under the instilled fervor radical cultic devotion. The essence of Mohammed’s example and Mohammedanism’s general practice in nations where it is the majority is evidentiary of its non-peaceful existence [Updated Link]. The West where Freedom and Liberty has become a learned heritage, the minority Mohammedans have begun to be so bold as to demand government recognition of Sharia Law [Original FrontPageMag link Not Found. Site search for “Sharia Law” begins with most recent post and works backward]; indeed honor killings [The ORIGINAL link redirects to a website focusing on LGBTQ violence more than woman being murdered by Muslims for dishonoring Islam – NOT GOING THERE! ERGO, 3-posts focusing on Muslims killing women for dishonoring Islam: Islamic Honor Killings in the West – originally 9/1/10 updated 4/1/21; Are Islamic Honor Killings a Growing Threat in America? – 4/28/15; And website updated frequently focused on Muslim violence against womenSTOP honor killings]

and rape [ORIGINAL link was to a now defunct Live Leak. ERGO, Here is a Brightwork Research & Analysis post Last Updated as of this reading 5/6/22 entitled. “How Islam Constantly Endorses and Enables Rape and Rapists”] are increasing in the West more so in Europe [ORIGINAL link redirects to a message: “Coming soon a blog for Americans searching for information to help enrich their lives” listing the impending website to be AmericanDaily.com] but the beginnings are emerging in America [Updated Debbie Schlussel link dated 1/3/08 entitle, “The Dallas Muslim Honor Killings & ICE: I Correctly Called It, Dallas HQ, Plus Policy Implications”].

JRH 6/14/08 [From this point was the cross post to Bill Warner’s “An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, Part 10” which I have updated to CPCR (formerly NCCR).

 

+++++++++++++

13. Victim History vs. Jihad

March 2009

Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2009/03/victim-history-vs-jihad.html

NCCR/CPCR Link: https://oneway2day.com/2009/03/15/victim-history-vs-jihad/

 

Photo: Pretend Islamofascists Not at War with Non-Muslims


 

Bill Warner has placed a FrontPage [Original link Dead Redirects to https://www.frontpagemag.com/Default.aspx] interview conducted by Jamie Glazov on his Political Islam [UPDATED Link] blog.

In the interview Warner speaks of a kind of Orwellian new order being placed on America (I would include all Western style Representative Governments). Warner even uses Orwell-speak by calling this emerging new order the “Newstate.”

Essentially the interview line of thought is the “Newstate” is in the tank for Mohammedanism to such a degree that American Free Speech is being anesthetized to squelch anti-Jihad free speech while accommodating Muslim Supremacism in American society.

It is an enlightening interview to read. I suggest you do so. [Updated Link]

JRH [Defunct SlantRight embedded link removed] 3/14/09 [Added the old SlantRight cross post of Political Islam/FPM interview to CPCR/NCCR old post – Bill Warner is very enlightening even for 2023.]

 

Photo: Christians Blinded about Political Islam


 

+++++++++++++++++

14. An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 8

May 2008

Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/05/ethical-basis-for-war-against-political.html

Could not locate on NCCR/CPCR

 

Photo: Afghanistan Terrorist School toon


 

Okay. I am a weekly subscriber to the blog Political Islam [Updated Link]. The blog is militantly anti-Islam. I know it is not politically correct (especially among Leftists) but I do find Political Islam quite refreshing that it has busted out of the comfort zone of being nice. Political Islam points out the very things I believe about Mohammedanism: Radical Islam is not an aberration of Mohammedanism rather that theo-political Islamism is a revivalist movement following the example and teachings of a man called Mohammed. Radical Islamism is the true face of Mohammedanism even though the millions of adherents are the minority.

The so-called moderate Muslim is a person that has chosen to live a peaceful life. If a moderate Muslim is devout he/she cherry picks the nice beauty of the Quran and the lesser holy writings of Mohammedanism. The moderate adherent re-interprets the function of the not so nice writings of their holy scriptures and re-interprets the examples of Mohammed.

Thus a Westerner is propagandized that “jihad” means inner struggle and not holy war to convert or eradicate the kafir. To a moderate Muslim’s credit “jihad” has been revised to mean “inner struggle;” nonetheless that is not the example of Mohammed. Indeed one rarely reads or hears clamoring from the majority so-called moderate peace loving Mohammedan because in their heart there is an admiration of the purity of the theo-political beginnings of Islam.

With that little introduction I now lead into this week’s e-newsletter form Political Islam:

JRH [Was cross posted to defunct SlantRight website] 5/28/08
************************

An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 8

Bill Warner
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Political Islam
[Updated link. NOT CROSS POSTING to cut down length. Click the updated CSPII/Political Islam embedded link to read still relevant info]

 

+++++++++++++++++

15. Obama-the House Negro

November 2008

Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-house-negro.html

Could not locate on NCCR/CPCR

 

Photo: Uncle Ayman al-Zawahri Wants You 


Here is an interesting analysis by Bill Warner of Political Islam [Updated Link to title] concerning the epithets by Islamic al-Qaida terrorist Ayman al-Zawahri. I am curious: Will the al-Zawahri epithets induce Obama to talks without pre-conditions [Updated Link redirected to Washington Independent post dated 7/30/20 entitled “Petraeus Talk Bolsters Obama”. The only difference from original is the “https”. Since this Blogger post occurred in 2008, I suspect the original content differed from 2020.] or spur the hunt for al-Qaida leadership and have them killed [Original link redirects to The Times HOMEPAGE so I deleted it]?

JRH [Cross posted at defunct SlantRight website] 11/22/08 [Since I’m convinced the title drove Blogger censors nuts, I’m cross posting the CSPII/Political Islam version below.]

*********

Obama-the House Negro

By Bill Warner

Nov 21 2008

CSPII/Political Islam

 

Of Interest

The transcript of Zawahiri’s Message [Updated Link] to Obama
Walid Phares [Link not found – COUNTERTERRORISM BLOG ceased operations in 2011 but is still up I could not locate a search function.] on Zawahiri’s Message to Obama [Blog Editor: I found a “Not secure” link that apparently cross posted the Counterterrorism Blog under the title “Zahrawi: Jihad will Continue Despite Obama - By: Dr. Walid Phares” Date: 11/19/08. This could be what Bill Warner was pointing to but it is only a guess.]

 

The media has been atwitter with Al-Qaida’s Ayman al-Zawahri’s insult of Obama [Link redirects to Breitbart HOMEPAGE] by calling him the house Negro. What he actually said was abeed al-beit. Abeed is not just a slave, but a black slave. Islam’s refined doctrine of slavery includes over 40 words for slaves, including the slave’s race. If you were white, you would be a mamluk, a white slave.

 

Mohammed and his wife owned black slaves, along with every other kind of slave, including sex slaves. Mohammed’s favorite sexual partner at one time was a white slave, Mary, a Coptic Christian.


Zawahri’s insult was pure Islam. The Koran is filled with insults and curses by Allah. Insults and curses are part of Islamic logic. Kafir (non-Muslim) logic advances an argument by analogy, syllogisms, cause and effect–scientific logic. Islamic logic is based upon making you submit to Islam. Therefore repeated force, threats and insults are all part of the logic of simply overpowering the other. This is similar to a thug using brute force and yelling to “persuade” the victim.

 

The Koran instructs Muslims on how to use insults and curses against kafirs:

 

74:16 No, I [Allah] say. He is an enemy of Our revelations. I will impose a dreadful punishment on him because he plotted and planned.
74:19 Damn him! How he planned. Again, Damn him! How he planned.

 

And here we have the Koran insulting Jews by calling them apes (a favorite insult by Muslims about Jews):

 

7:156 But when they [the Jews] persisted in what they had been forbidden, We said to them, “Be as apes, despised and loathed.”

 

Here we have Mohammed repeating the insult when he attacked the Bin Qurayza Jews of Medina:

 

Ishaq note 684: Mohammed called upon his troops, and they headed for the Jews. Mohammed rode up to the forts and called out, “You brothers of apes, has Allah disgraced you and brought His vengeance upon you?”

 

Mohammed and Allah repeatedly insulted others who didn’t agree with Mohammed. The worst insult is kafir. Most Korans translate this word as unbeliever, but that is a neutral term. The Koran goes further to say that Allah hates kafirs and plots against them. Over half of the Koran is written about kafirs and it is uniformly negative. Kafirs may be murdered, tortured, enslave, raped, robbed, insulted and deceived with impunity.

 

Zawahri’s insult of Obama is an insult by a person. However, it is not a person, but Allah, the creator of the universe and the sole deity that says that I am a kafir. That is not a personal insult, but a universal, omnipotent, sacred insult. Kafirs are lower than animals.

 

So when a Muslim comes home from work and says to his wife that he met a nice kafir today, the insult is so deeply ingrained, that he does not even think about it. After all, both Mohammed and Allah say that those who do not believe in Mohammed are kafirs, “the lowest of the low.”

 

But what is interesting is how Zawahri’s insult does not rub off on Islam. After all, Zawahri is called a radical Muslim, not a “real” Muslim. Therefore, what he says does not trouble people about Islam. Zawahri is not a radical Muslim, but one who follows the Islam of Medina, the violent Islam. He is a moderate Muslim of the Medinan sort, a 100% Muslim.

 

What if a white Christian Republican said the same thing? The media would not be atwitter, but in full outrage. This would be headline, long-lasting news. Not only would the white Christian speaker be condemned, but all white people and all Christians. Not only would the speaker have personal guilt, but also every group he was a member of would share in corporate guilt. But no Muslims will be condemned because of Zawahri’s slur. Muslims do not share in corporate guilt.

 

Another oddity is that some Obama supporters may think that since he has been insulted by a Muslim it proves that he is not in the Islamic camp. Such thinking ignores the fact that the person most apt to insult a Muslim is another Muslim. In the same way, a Muslim is much more apt to be killed by another Muslim than by a kafir. Once you get into the insult, curse and kill business, it is hard to limit it to kafirs.

 

There is some good news for Obama’s supporters. He may have been called “house Negro” (and actually the N-word is a better translation for abeed than Negro) but at least he was not called Hussein.

 

Copyright © 2008 CBSX, LLC

politicalislam.com

Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

 

++++++++++++++++++++

16. Exposing Islam is Hate Speech in Netherlands

January 2009

Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2009/01/exposing-islam-is-hate-speech-in.html

Could not locate on NCCR/CPCR

 

Photo: Geert Wilders Saving Western Civ toon


Geert Wilders [Updated Wikipedia probably different than original 2009 citation] is one of those rare European politicians that GET IT about the dangers of Islam.

Evidently Wilders’ self-produced movie entitled Fitna [Updated PJ Media Link] was not considered Free Speech but rather hate speech by a Dutch judge [Original Jihad Watch Link comes up “Not Found”. ERGO here are three Jihad Watch posts (there were actually many in the Jihad Watch search) relating Dutch Courts and Fitna: HERE, HERE & HERE]Fitna utilizes the Quran’s own words as an indictment of the theo-political nature of Islam. In so doing Wilders compared the Quran with Hitler’s Mein Kampf [Link Times Out for both “http” and “https” indicating Weapon Of Musical Defense as a website might still exist its server is down. If you are ambitious you can search engine the website then look for Winston Churchill. I have no idea what the original link entailed. It was long ago. This Dr. Andrew Bostom post from 2008 (many of the source links are dead) may give context with Churchill comparing the Quran to Hitler’s book.]. Evidently some lobby of Mohammedan propagandists did not want the truth about Islam to be so public and probably filed an official complaint.

Political Islam provides the gist of a Geert Wilders speech preceded by a short introduction. BE SURE TO READ IT! [UPDATED CSPII/Political Islam link to Bill Warner’s “Wilders, Redux” posted 1/21/09. Although I cross posted on the defunct SlantRight website and did not include a CPCR/NCCR version in 2009, I believe I served history in my intro about Wilders’ persecution for sharing truth. YET INDEED, read the updated version at CSPII/Political Islam.]

JRH 1/22/09

 

+++++++++++++++

17. Warner: The Doctrine of Ignorance

September 2008

Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/09/warner-doctrine-of-ignorance.html

NCCR/CPCR Link: https://oneway2day.com/2008/09/18/warner-the-doctrine-of-ignorance/

 

Photo: Giving Islam THE BOOT


Okay, I am a confirmed Islamophobe.

Being an Islamophobe does not mean I have a fear of Islam. It does not mean I have a racist hatred of the practitioners of Islam/Mohammedanism.

It DOES mean that I believe Mohammedanism is an inherently violent theo-political death-cult according to the example of its founder Mohammed and Mohammedanism subsequent writings considered holy by Mohammedans.

As a Christian, the Lord Jesus Christ tells me to walk in the God-kind of Love with my fellow Believers [Updated Link to Gal. 6:10 NKJV] and as much as is possible walk in the God-kind of Love with non-Believers as well [Updated Link to Romans 12:9-21 NKJV]. I tell you that it is often a tough path to walk with as a Mohammedans that honor the Wahhabi Sunni path [Original Link to a defunct SlantRight Website post. Here is an EXPLAINER ARTICLE from Global Security under the title “Wahhabi”]

or the Shi’ite Twelver path [Original link again defunct SlantRight post. Two Twelver EXPAINER posts: ThoughtCo – 2/28/19 & Global Security – last modified 5/7/11]. Those guys are wildly intolerant. Even the less violent schools of Mohammedan thought outside of the Hanbali [I found the answers.com redirect link to be insufficient. The Christian-based website Got Questions a great EXPLAINER on the Sunni school of Hanbali thought: “What is Hanbali Islam?” – last updated 1/4/22] tradition still follow the inherent violence of what Christians would call Mohammedan scriptures. Still I have to remind myself it is the Will of God that all humanity be Saved and come into the knowledge of the Saving Grace of Jesus Christ the Son of God.

Now that I have justified my version of Islamophobia, you need to read a blog post by Bill Warner of PoliticalIslam.com [Updated Link]. It is entitled “The Doctrine of Ignorance.” [Updated Link]

Warner writes of the danger of judging Mohammedanism by that nice co-worker or neighbor Ahmed. Ahmed may be sincerely nice; however if he is a true follower of the Mohammed and the following doctrines developed around Mohammed, Ahmed’s faith is dangerous.

It is kind of like the followers of David Koresh or Jim Jones: they called themselves Christians however they were consumed with death outside the realm of the teaching of the Son of God. A nice follower of Koresh or Jones did not practice a nice faith.

JRH [Defunct SlantRight link removed] 9/17/08 [Warner’s “The Doctrine of Ignorance” is cross posted at the end of the otherwise not updated CPCR/NCCR post dated 9/17/08. The updated cross post is dated 6/10/23.]

++++++++++++

 

That completes PART FOUR. There are more Blogger censored posts to update. A PART FIVE is in the future. I’m just uncertain when.

 

JRH 6/10/23

READER SUPPORTED!

Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online store: My Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!


Friday, April 14, 2023

Sharing, ‘Can Shariah Stand up to Critical Thinking?’

Posted by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

Podcast by Paul Sutliff

Intro © April 14, 2023

 

Paul Sutliff sent an interesting video to my email on a lengthy discussion of the topic “Can Shariah Stand up to Critical Thinking? Part 10 b7.3 to c1.3” posted 4/13/23 as a live broadcast. It’s worth being informed so if you have time constraints or a low attention span, it’s worth bookmarking to go back to where you left off.

 

Paul Sutliff (screengrab-'Can Shariah Stand up to Critical Thinking') 4/13/23

 

For those who do not know Paul, here’s an excerpt from his Amazon author page:

 

“Paul Sutliff has a BA in Religion and Philosophy from Roberts Wesleyan College, a MSEd from Nazareth College of Rochester and a post-grad Certificate in Mid-Level Intelligence Analysis. Paul is an educator, a research writer and a radio talk-show host. Paul says he is only an awakened Patriot to what is happening around him.

 

Paul first started to look into the Muslim Brotherhood after the college where he earned his MSEd took $500,000 from the international Institute of Islamic Thought. It took only a short bit of research to realize that a former Catholic college had opened its doors to an enemy of the United States. This was easy to find since they had personally delivered a satellite phone battery pack used in the bombings of our Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya according to the FBI.

 

In 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden called for jihad on American soil (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOhjQ9qoVJw) and a NYC mosque called for the murder of those who insult Muhammad (https://www.al-khoei.us/books/?id=5516). The question that needs to be answered is what does Islam teach vs. what the followers of Islam state they believe.”

 

READ THE REST (and check out his books)

 

I believe Paul Sutliff’s most recent book is “The Cancer of Civilization Jihad”, which can be purchased at Amazon.

 

Paul has a Blog that is not as active as in times past, but a great place to learn the actual nature of Islam which is not a pretty proposition for we non-Muslims: Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad.

 

Paul Sutliff seems more dedicated to his podcast The Sutliffian Report which I believe is easiest to access on Youtube (I used to catch it on Blog Talk Radio): https://www.youtube.com/@thesutliffianreport1461/videos.

 

AND NOW the video shared via email by Paul.

 

Youtube VIDEO: Can Shariah Stand up to Critical Thinking? Part 10 b7.3 to c1.3


 

Posted by The Sutliffian Report

Posted on (Originally live streamed) April 13, 2023

 

Can Shariah standup to Critical Thinking? Does Shariah openly proclaim Islam as Gnosticism? What if Shariah promotes the concept of secret knowledge as salvation? Today we examine b7.0 to b7.2. What happens if the translation has misinformation? What happens if Shariah lies???? Worse, What if it can never be changed???

 

JRH 4/14/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

 

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!


Monday, March 27, 2023

Ye Old Islam & Leftist Wokism


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© March 27, 2023

 

There was a time I was a huge Counterjihad Blogger, but since Trump’s campaign days circa 2016 and beyond, it became my sense that the enemies within promoting an odd combination of Fascist-Marxist-Corporatist Globalism (perhaps a great short phrase for the WEF/UN Agenda) are a greater threat to American Cultural and Liberty traditions than Islam.

 

BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE! The tenets of Islam are no friend to American traditional Culture (as opposed to Great-Reset Agenda 21/2030 Woke culture) nor to the American Liberty conceived by our Founding Fathers AND definitely a threat to Judeo-Christianity (actually encoded in Islamic revered writings such as the Quran, Hadith and Sira).

 

Some Examples Politically Incorrect in a Woke World Still Available:

 

o   The Religion of Peace (website focusing on modern Islamic related terrorism and atrocities)

 

o   Political Islam (Bill Warner’s blog containing years of study exposing Islam)

 

o   Raymond Ibrahim (Still quite active exposing Islam and defending Christianity)

 

o   Investigative Project on Terrorism (or IPT – still quite exposing Islam and Islamic terrorism)

 

Some Historical Perspective on Wicked Islam:

 

o   1,400 Years of Christian/Islamic Struggle: An Analysis; By Richard C. Csaplar, Jr.; CBN; No Date

 

o   Islam Is Satan’s Cult of Evil! The Real Truth about Islam and Its False Prophet Muhammad! Posted by StevieRay Hansen; HNEWS WIRE; 9/20/22 (includes an hour & six-minute history video)

 

So, why the trip down blog memory lane?

 

I ran into an IPT book review of “Woke Army: The Red-Green Alliance That Is Destroying America's Freedom” by Asra Q. Nomani (Amazon bio). You can tell by title the review is of the ungodly Marxist-Red and Islamic-Green crazy alliance because Liberty is antithetical to both ideologies. Below is that book review.

 

BUT FIRST, I’m adding a little personal store information for the ladies. If interested, a purchase means I get a percentage and you get a discount:

 

THE HORMONE-FREE METHOD TO HELP SUPPORT HEALTHY MENSTRUATION AND MENOPAUSE

  

OVA & OVA-m

 

Why is it that so many women accept period cramps, mood swings, low libido, hot flashes and more as an inevitable part of being female? Yet we all know someone who breezes through their menstrual cycle seemingly no worse for the wear, who doesn’t know the frustration of occasionally bleeding through super plus tampons, who doesn’t crave monthly pints of cookie dough ice cream, and who experiences an active and enjoyable sex life through menopause and beyond. We’ll have what she’s having.

 

When you experience irregular periods, breast tenderness, mood swings, bloating, brain fog, food cravings or congested skin during your menstrual cycle, or if you experience mild and occasional hot flashes, night sweats, low libido or vaginal dryness during menopause, it’s easy to chalk it up to hormones. But what exactly are hormones and what role do they play in female health?

 

BEING HORMONAL IS BEING HUMAN

 

Ever been told you’re acting “hormonal”? The truth is every human being is hormonal — it helps keep you alive! Your hormones act as messengers, relaying signals across various parts of your body. Not just between your uterus and ovaries, but also to and from your thyroid, brain, bones, digestive system and more.

 

Hormones can be divided into 4 communication pathways:

 

… MORE TO READ (REFERRAL DISCOUNT CODE – 2388058): https://tinyurl.com/fx7ddt7h

 

Purchase OVA or OVA-m with discount HERE: https://tinyurl.com/mr22j58h  

 

JRH 3/27/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

************************

"Woke Army" Exposes Red-Green Alliance's Pernicious Goal to Silence Radical Islam Critics

  

Woke Army book jacket

 

By Abha Shankar - IPT News

March 26, 2023

Investigative Project on Terrorism

 

In her new book, Woke Army: The Red-Green Alliance That is Destroying America's Freedom, former Wall Street Journal reporter Asra Nomani exposes the "Woke Army" – an unholy alliance of radical Islamists and far left activists who are leveraging identity politics and racial conflict to subvert American democracy and castigate Israel.

 

The diabolical agenda of this well-funded ideological nexus is revealed in the creation of a disinformation website. The goal of this hidden network of keyboard warriors hiding behind fake identities is clear: To discredit Muslim reformers and critics of radical Islam, and frame Muslims as perpetual victims.

 

"LoonWatch.com was born on April Fool's Day 2009. At precisely 20:33:38, someone used the pseudonym 'Zuhair Thomas' to register the new website with GoDaddy, an internet service provider based in Arizona," writes Nomani. "What 'Zuhair' created was a platform for anonymous character assassins, who used the names of little-known fish species — 'Emperor', 'Garibaldi', 'Danios', 'Darter' — to conceal their identities. Their targets were so-called 'loons': anyone who spoke out against Islamic extremism, or in favour of Muslim reform."

 

 

Woke Army Quote 1

 

The masterminds behind this "stealthy network of anonymous cyber hitmen" were leaders of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), including its Chicago office director Ahmed Rehab and staffer Muhammad Tauseef Akbar.

 

CAIR, says Nomani, masquerades as "a civil rights group dedicated solely to protecting the rights of Muslim Americans."

 

"At its core, this [CAIR] network is anti-Semitic and has contempt for secular American values," Nomani adds. "It supports a dangerous worldview that Islam ought to be at the center of politics, setting laws, public policy, and regulatory rules."

 

America's influential Islamist network has also embedded itself into the country's class and race war "to racialize any criticism of Islam or Muslims as 'Islamophobia' and press their grievances." Nomani describes the emergence of an "Honor Brigade" in the wake of the 2005 Danish cartoon controversy.

 

The controversy provided Islamists "the grievance they needed to win sympathy with their 'woke' allies," she writes. Muslim world leaders led by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) "decided in late 2005 to leverage allegations of 'Islamophobia' to push an attack on the West and defense of 'true Islam.'" In fact, the OIC – "the mini-United Nations for Muslim countries" – helped in "creating a brigade to protect the honor of Islam, the perfect foil to deflect criticism of the controversial ideas and growing influence of Islamist governments and movements."

 

The Woke Army is anti-capitalist, anti-American, and seeks Israel's destruction. Its adherents espouse ideas of "critical race theory" – a form of Cultural Marxism that pushes dogmatic propaganda: "racism, not freedom, is America's bedrock; white people are oppressors and black people are oppressed; meritocracy is white supremacy."

 

"This network has waged a relentless and often vicious character assassination campaign against Muslim reformers and others with similar viewpoints," writes Nomani. "Their goal: to discredit and silence those who have the gall to question their narrative that all the ails of our society can be reduced to 'racism,' or in the case of Muslims, 'Islamophobia.'"

 

"Their tactics," she adds, "are the tactics of bullies and authoritarians, not democrats."

 

The "Honor Brigade" secured a victory in 2008 with the publication of a National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) guide, "Words that Work and Words that Don't: A Guide for Counterterrorism Communication."

 

"Avoid labeling everything 'Muslim,'" the guide instructed. Terms like "Islamism" and "Islamist" were made taboo. CAIR publicized the victory by posting a United Press International article about the NCTC guidance on its website.

 

Woke Army Quote 2

 

Islamist appeasement during the Obama years continued to empower the "Honor Brigade."

 

"Illiberal Muslims," according to Nomani, "had enjoyed an incredible influence during eight years of the Obama administration, in a strategic, orchestrated campaign, impacting national security policy from issues of surveillance to the silencing of any discussion on the Islam in Islamic extremism, acting like an Honor Brigade, defending perceived offenses against the dignity of Muslims as 'Islamophobia.'"

 

Woke Army Quote 3

 

Nomani describes Honor Brigade attempts to smear witnesses in a 2011 congressional hearing on Islamic radicalization. Islamists cast the hearings as a McCarthyite witch hunt targeting all Muslims.

 

"CAIR Chicago's Ahmed Rehab used his 'Emperor' cover to publish an attack on the witnesses immediately on LoonWatch," writes Nomani. "Rehab attacked [Zuhdi] Jasser[Abdirizak] Bihi, and [Melvin] Bledsoe as 'non-experts' who were bereft of any credentials or expertise in the field of radicalization, terrorism, or extremism."

 

Jasser and Bihi are Muslims "who had been working tirelessly in the trenches to defeat Islamic extremism in U.S. communities." Bledsoe's son Abdulhakim Muhammad – formerly known as Carlos Bledsoe – was sentenced to life in prison in 2011 for shooting two soldiers outside an Army recruiting center in Arkansas, killing one.

 

After the hearings, an anonymous Facebook page appeared calling Jasser "a Clown and an Uncle Tom Muslim." Subsequent posts called Jasser "a lapdog," "shameless," "one of many fools," and "a well-behaved pet."

 

Nomani also describes Islamists use of "intersectional" politics by tying Israel to the 2014 killing of Michael Brown by a Ferguson, Mo., and coining the slogan, "From Ferguson to Palestine."

 

Woke Army Quote 4

 

Hungarian American billionaire George Soros' Open Society Foundations and the Proteus Fund are main Woke Army funders, Nomani writes. She describes the center of U.S. Islamists' political and financial power as "500 Grove Street," the home to the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a private Virginia think tank long suspected of serving as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

The "alphabet soup of organizations that had grown out of the work of the Muslim Brothers at 500 Grove Street" includes "ICNA Council for Social Justice, American Muslims for Palestine, CAIR, Muslim American Society-PACE, Muslim Ummah of North America, Muslim American Society-DC, ICNA Virginia Islamic Center, and Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center (where the 9/11 hijackers and Anwar al-Awlaki had prayed)."

 

The influence of the "Muslim Brothers" continues to grow. In some cases, it is the children of Islamists taking their political agenda to new heights.

 

Abrar Omeish, "an important daughter of the Muslim Brothers," was elected in 2019 to the Fairfax County School Board. At an AMP fundraiser that year, she promised to make school curriculum "friendly to the cause of Palestine."

 

Abrar Omeish's father, Esam Omeish, is described as "part of the rise of the Muslim Brothers in America."

 

In 2007, Omeish was forced to resign from Virginia's Commission of Immigration after an Investigative Project on Terrorism video from 2000 showed him praising "our brothers and sisters in Philistine [Palestine]" for knowing "that the jihad way is the way to liberate your land."

 

Nomani details an incident from a 2019 ICNA convention in Washington, D.C., featuring Laila Al-Arian, daughter of Sami Al-Arian. Sami Al-Arian was a member of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad's governing board, and agreed to be deported as part of his guilty plea for conspiring to aid the PIJ. He was deported to Turkey in 2015.

 

Laila was talking about Muslim prisoners, a euphemism for convicted Islamist terrorists. It was a mostly empty hall, and upon seeing Nomani sitting "quietly, listening," she pointed to Nomani calling her an "Islamophobe." Al-Arian's husband, Jonathan Brown, "stood in front of me, leaning across the row of chairs in front of me, hurling his finger at me and shouting, "Leave! Leave! Leave!" (I didn't.)," recounts Nomani.

 

Nomani's courageous expose is an important breakthrough in exposing the duplicitous machinations of the "Muslim Brothers" in America. It's an inspiration to those who fear for American democracy and freedom the world over to suit up and enter the trenches to defeat the "Woke Army."

 

Abha Shankar is the IPT research director

Copyright © 2023. Investigative Project on Terrorism. All rights reserved.

Contribute to the IPT

                                                    

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Addressing ‘mohammedbasha’ Comment Promoting Islam

John R. Houk
© November 13, 2019

Photo capture of website exposing Origins of Islamic Culture. CLICK HERE then scroll to bottom of page to click image info.

At my SlantRight 2.0 blog I have comments set for moderation ONLY. The reason most comment are of a spam advertising nature – some product oriented and some just vulgar porn. Along that same line I typically IGNORE off the bat when a comment is authored by “Anonymous”. Once in a while out of the corner of my eye I might an “Anonymous” commenter with a valid comment to a post – that person would get lucky and get added as a comment. BUT that would be few and far between and especially RARE.

Here is the reason for going over comment practices on the SlantRight 2.0 blog. I actually got a comment to moderate from an individual self-identified as “mohammedbasha”.  If you go to mohammedbasha’s Blogger profile page the info on identity is quite pseudonymous yet quite obviously the image of a Muslim Apologist. In case you are unaware, like American Dems Muslim Apologists at worst outright lie or at best so brainwashed by their religious leaders are sadly deceived to believe infamous actions are good for humanity. Here is a copy and paste of mohammedbasha’s Blogger profile page:

My blogs

·        Quran And Science

Contact me

·        My Web Page

On Blogger since October 2019

About me

Industry: Religion

Occupation: Consultant

Location: Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Since mohammedbasha was good enough to not post “anonymous” I first examined the post being commented on which is “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?” posted on 11/4/17. The purpose of that post hopefully summed up in these excerpts:

On 11/2 I vented a bit about the hypocrisy of the Mainstream Media (MSM) reporting like wimps on the Islamic terrorist attack by Sayfullo Saipov in Manhattan. Saipov killed eight and injured many others on Halloween for Allah, Muhammad and ISIS.

I shared the blog post on the G+ Community Boycott!🚫CNN, MSNBC & LIBERAL MEDIA (among other Communities and Groups). Two Community commenters had an interesting enough dialogue that I have decided to cross post most of it as a standalone post. The dialogue was between “ron keramer” and “Christina Johnston”.

You can definitely read the ire I had with Muslims acting on Islamic revered writing in the embedded links in the first paragraph. Unfortunately G+ Communities as a social platform no longer exist ergo you cannot read those sources. The next paragraph of “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?” clarifies the existence of the hypocrisy that Muslim Apologists and Multicultural Leftists hold against the critics of Islam:

The title of the post is “I Am Islamorgizo not Islamophobic”. The context of the post is being weary of the MSM insisting anyone that is critical of Islam is an Islamophobic racist. So, I found a Greek word that connotates a fixed anger akin to settled opposition. That Greek word is orgízō. Just as Multiculturalists and Islamic Apologists hooked “Islam” with the Greek derivative for “phobia” to form Islamophobe, I connected Islam with orgízō to create Islamorgizo – a settled angry opposition to Islam. Then I explained the reason why Islam deserves settled angry opposition not only for its revered writings justifying violence against non-Muslims, but also to show contrasting Quran and the Bible that Islam is specifically an Antichrist religion. Incidentally, Islam is the ONLY non-Christian religion that specifically denies the centrality of the Christian faith. You’ll have to read “I Am Islamorgizo not Islamophobic” for the details.

Sadly, to my knowledge, the term “Islamorgizo” has never caught on to counter calling critics of Islam Islamophobes. Allow me to reiterate that I do not have an irrational fear Islam but I have an angry opposition for what Islam stands for in that socio-political religion’s obsessed violent hatred of all things non-Islamic with the specific labelling of the “People of the Book” (meaning the Holy Bible) as the people who have twisted the so-called original revered writings (meaning the Quran that never existed in any form prior to the recollections of Muhammad’s fellow pillagers, rapists and slavers put their leader’s sayings to pen and paper) – Interesting afterthought: “The Myth: Muhammad Would
Never Approve of Rape – DEBUNKED
”)
of Islam’s Allah.

With all the above embedded links a non-Muslim – especially a Jew and Christian – should be concerned with the socio-political religion known as Islam, below is the brief comment (not approved to be posted to “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?”) by mohammedbash:

mohammedbasha has left a new comment on your post "Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?":


Misconceptions About Islam is a website that misrepresents by misleading readers about what Islam’s revered writings stipulate AND what history records. Here’s an excerpt example:

Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) Founded Islam?

It’s been Misconceptions About Islam and misunderstood by many that Islam was founded by Prophet Muhammed around 1400 years ago in the middle of Arabia. But the truth is advent of Islam dated since origin of Adam, who was the first human being to worship the one and only God. Prophets who came later were also Muslims and propagated Allah is the true creator with no companions or children. A true Muslim submits self to the true God and accept Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) as his final messenger. [Blog Editor: A demonic lie if communicated by Quran, it was only by the lips of Muhammed later recorded into writing by a follower (or followers) of Muhammed into writing after the false prophet’s death in 632 AD (or CE for secular minded scholars).]

Allah; the God for Muslims Only?

The Real Meaning of the word Allah is “One True God” in Arabic. It also refers to the one who created heavens, earth, sea, mountain and everything that stays in the universe. Even Arabic speaking Jews & Christians refer God with the name of Allah. So essentially our faith/belief is up on one and only powerful God though cited with multiple names (Allah, Yahweh or God the Father)

Blog Editor: I am convinced the Muslim faith are taught and believe “Allah” means “One True God”. But that literally is not accurate.


Allah: Islam – God

Origin of Allah
Arabic All?h from al, the + il?h, god, akin to Classical Hebrew (language) eloah, God (citing: Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fifth Edition Copyright © 2014 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

Allah: God, especially in Islam.

Origin of Allah
Arabic allāh al- the 'ilāh god l (citing: THE AMERICAN HERITAGE® DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, FIFTH EDITION by the Editors of the American Heritage Dictionaries. Copyright © 2016, 2011 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

Of more interest on “Allah” from webpage entitled, The pagan origin of the word, "Allah":


The pre-Islamic origin of "Allah"

1.  There is absolutely no question that Allah was worshipped by the pagan Arabs as one of many polytheistic gods.

2.  Allah was worshipped in the Kabah at Mecca before Muhammad was born. Muhammad merely proclaimed a god the Meccans were already familiar with. The pagan Arabs never accused Muhammad of preaching a different Allah than the one they already worshipped.

3.  Many scholars say "Allah" is derived from a compound Arabic word, AL + ILAH = Allah. "Ilah" in Arabic is "God" and "Al" in Arabic is a definite article like our word "the". So from an English equivalent "Allah" comes from "The + God". Others, like Arthur Jeffery say, "The common theory is that it is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and the article al-; thus al-ilah, the god," becomes Allah, "God." This theory, however, is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words borrowed into the language in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic." (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion, Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)

4.  Although "Allah" has become known as the proper name for the Muslim god, Allah is not a name, but a descriptor that means literally, "the god". All pagan cultures have these generic terms that refer to their "top god" as "the god". In comparison to the perfect monotheism of Judaism and Christianity, "Allah" was originally no more a proper name for the Muslim God, than the word Hebrew "elohim" (god) or Greek "theos" (god) are proper names of the one true God of the Bible. "Jehovah" is the only revealed proper name for the "Elohim" of the Old Testament ( Ex 3:13; 6:3) and "Jesus" is the only revealed proper name of "Theos" in the New Testament. (Acts 4:12) Islam has no proper name for their god, but merely transformed, by universal use and confusion, the generic Allah into a proper name. So although today, Muslims use "Allah" as a proper name, it was never used this way originally. Allah, therefore is equivalent to "elohim" and "ho theos" but not "Jehovah" or "Jesus". Allah is not the name of the nameless Muslim God. However Muslims will claim that Allah is the name of God that corresponds to Jehovah. Both the Father and the Son are called "ho theos" (The God). Jesus is called "The God" many times in the New Testament: John 20:28; Heb 1:8. An important conclusion from this, is that the mere fact that "Allah" is equivalent to "elohim" and "ho theos" does not mean they are directly corresponded. It certainly doesn't prove Allah is the same as the God of the Old or New Testament. It does not prove that Muslim's worship the same God as Christians. If this correspondence proved the Muslim god was the same as the Christian God, then because pagan religions also have generics that correspond to "the god" (Allah), this correspondence would also prove that Allah is the same god as the Buddhist god, for Buddhists also refer to their god as "the god".

What scholars say about the origin of the word "Allah":

1.  It is not related that the Black Stone was connected with any special god. In the Ka'ba was the statue of the god Hubal who might be called the god of Mecca and of the Ka'ba. Caetani gives great prominence to the connection between the Ka'ba and Hubal. Besides him, however, al-Lat, al-`Uzza, and al-Manat were worshipped and are mentioned in the Kur'an; Hubal is never mentioned there. What position Allah held beside these is not exactly known. The Islamic tradition has certainly elevated him at the expense of other deities. It may be considered certain that the Black Stone was not the only idol in or at the Ka'ba. The Makam Ibrahim was of course a sacred stone from very early times. Its name has not been handed down. Beside it several idols are mentioned, among them the 360 statues. (First Encyclopedia of Islam, E.J. Brill, 1987, Islam, p. 587-591)

2.  "The verses of the Qur'an make it clear that the very name Allah existed in the Jahiliyya or pre-Islamic Arabia. Certain pagan tribes believed in a god whom they called 'Allah' and whom they believed to be the creator of heaven and earth and holder of the highest rank in the hierarchy of the gods. It is well known that the Quraish as well as other tribes believed in Allah, whom they designated as the 'Lord of the House' (i.e., of the Ka'ba)...It is therefore clear that the Qur'anic conception of Allah is not entirely new." (A Guide to the Contents of the Qur'an, Faruq Sherif, (Reading, 1995), pgs. 21-22., Muslim)

3.  According to al-Masudi (Murudj, iv. 47), certain people have regarded the Ka'ba as a temple devoted to the sun, the moon and the five planets. The 36o idols placed round the Ka'ba also point in this direction. It can therefore hardly be denied that traces exist of an astral symbolism. At the same time one can safely say that there can be no question of any general conception on these lines. The cult at the Ka'ba was in the heathen period syncretic as is usual in heathenism. (First Encyclopedia of Islam, E.J. Brill, 1987, Islam, p. 587-591)

4.  The name Allah, as the Qur'an itself is witness, was well known in pre-Islamic Arabia. Indeed, both it and its feminine form, Allat, are found not infrequently among the theophorous names in inscriptions from North Arabia. The common theory is that it is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and the article al-; thus al-ilah, the god," becomes Allah, "God." This theory, however, is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words borrowed into the language in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic. (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion, Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)

5.  "If a Muslim says, "Your God and our God is the same," either he does not understand who Allah and Christ really are, or he intentionally glosses over the deep-rooted differences." (Who Is Allah In Islam?, Abd-Al Masih, Light of Life, 1985, p. 36.)

6.  Now there dwelt in Mecca a god called Allah. He was the provider, the most powerful of all the local deities, the one to whom every Meccan turned in time of need. But, for all his power, Allah was a remote god. At the time of Muhammad, however, he was on the ascendancy. He had replaced the moon god as lord of the Kaaba although still relegated to an inferior position below various tribal idols and three powerful goddesses: al-Manat, goddess of fate, al-Lat, mother of the gods, and al-Uzza, the planet Venus. (Islam and the Arabs, Rom Landau, 1958 p 11-21)

… AND MORE with a total of 66 refutations about the origins of  “Allah” - The pagan origin of the word, "Allah"; Written by Brother Andrew; The Interactive Bible.

At this point I appreciate the Muslim Apologist going by mohammedbasha chose not to comment anonymously. But pointing to a website misleading about the reality of Islam’s animus toward non-Muslims needed to be addressed in a stand-alone post. AND THERE YOU HAVE IT.

JRH 11/13/19
Your generosity is always appreciated: 
Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.