DONATE

Showing posts with label Samantha Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samantha Power. Show all posts

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Brennan squirming over the fallout from his seditious rhetoric?



My fellow Trump supporters, I’m certain you have been upset as much I for Deep State Leftists openly threatening the President of the United States for his swamp emptying efforts (which is not moving fast enough). The Leftist hubris truly showed its ugly head when the lying (coup encouraging) criminal Andrew McCabe was not only removed from the position of Deputy Director of the FBI but was also fired when lying under oath and criminal leaks to the Leftist MSM became undeniable.

Enter former CIA Director John Brennan (one-time devotee CPUSA voter of Gus Hall (SEE ALSO HERE) and rumored Muslim convert). Brennan not only criticized President Trump in a vile manner but also hinted at a coup to remove the President from Office.

Dee Fatouros cross posted a very erudite exposition of Brennan treachery from The American Spectator. I am crossing Fatouros’ post because I like her introduction.

(As an aside note, I usually promote blog posts extensive on Social Media, but Fatouros has already done so. By all means go to her post on The Realistic Observer and like it!)

JRH 3/22/18
*************************
Brennan squirming over the fallout from his seditious rhetoric?

Posted by Dee Fatouros
March 22, 2018 7:14:00 AM

John Brennan

Well John, for someone in your position, openly calling for a coup is not the brightest of ideas. Your iniquities have gone far beyond "just" lying under oath.  Like most dwellers in the DC muck and mire, the more exposed you are, the more unhinged you become.

Ten years ago, the lawlessness and treason which occurred under the previous administration was unfathomable.

With the election of the new president, we now have well funded seditious activity to a degree not ever seen before.

Is this now the new normal? Will every newly elected administration face rebellion, anarchy and chaos if the "powers that be" do not agree with the electorate?

If the lefty elites have their way, you, you betcha.

The following article adds another chapter to the Chronicles of John Brennan.

As his plot to destroy Trump backfires, his squeals grow louder.

Facebook It was the Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky who coined the phrase the “dustbin of history.” To his political opponents, he sputtered, “You are pitiful, isolated individuals! You are bankrupts. Your role is played out. Go where you belong from now on — into the dustbin of history!”

It is no coincidence that John Brennan, who supported the Soviet-controlled American Communist Party in the 1970s (he has acknowledged that he thought his vote for its presidential candidate Gus Hall threatened his prospects at the CIA; unfortunately, it didn’t), would borrow from Trotsky’s rhetoric in his fulminations against Donald Trump. His tweet last week, shortly after the firing of Andrew McCabe, reeked of Trotskyite revolutionary schlock: “When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America… America will triumph over you.”

America will triumph over a president it [sic] elected? That’s the raw language of coup, and of course it is not the first time Brennan has indulged it. In 2017, he was calling for members of the executive branch to defy the chief executive. They should “refuse to carry out” his lawful directives if they don’t agree with them, he said.

Trump has said that the Russians are “laughing their asses off” over the turmoil caused by Obamagate. No doubt many of the laughs come at the sight of Brennan, a supporter of Soviet stooges like Gus Hall, conducting a de facto coup from the top of the CIA and then continuing it after his ouster. Who needs Gus Hall when John Brennan is around? This time the Russians don’t even have to pay for the anti-American activity.

Another hardcore leftist, Samantha Power, who spent the weeks after Trump’s victory rifling through intelligence picked up on his staff, found Brennan’s revolutionary tweet very inspiring. “Not a good idea to piss off John Brennan,” she wrote. Sounded pretty dark and grave. But not to worry, she tweeted later. She just meant that the former CIA director was going to smite Trump with the power of his “eloquent voice.”

Out of power, these aging radicals can’t help themselves. They had their shot to stop Trump, they failed, and now they are furious. The adolescent coup talk grows more feverish with each passing day. We have a former CIA director calling for the overthrow of a duly elected president, a former attorney general (Eric Holder) calling for a “knife fight,” a Senate minority leader speaking ominously about what the intelligence community might do to Trump (“they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Schumer has said), and assorted former FBI and CIA officials cheering for a coup, such as CNN’s Phil Mudd who says, “You’ve been around for 13 months. We’ve been around since 1908. I know how this game is going to be played. We’re going to win.”

In all this unhinged chatter, the partisan origins of Obamagate become clearer. The same anti-Trump hatred on display in their tweets and punditry drove the political espionage. James Kallstrom, the former FBI Assistant Director, notes that the “animus and malice” contained in Brennan’s tweet is “prima facie exposure of how he felt about Trump before the election.”

All the key figures in the decision to open up a probe on Trump wanted him to lose — from Brennan to Peter Strzok, whose anti-Trump machinations included, according to the latest batch of texts with his mistress, plotting to manipulate a buddy on the FISA court. In one text, he wonders if he can finagle a meeting with his friend by inviting him to a “cocktail party.” The impropriety aforethought on display in that tweet is staggering, but of course the media has paid no attention to it, preoccupied as it is with Andrew McCabe’s retirement income.

McCabe, by the way, has removed all doubts about his capacity for partisan lying with his post-firing statement, which rests entirely upon it. With all of its anti-Trump special pleading, the statement reads like it was cobbled together by Rachel Maddow. Like so many other ruling-class frauds, McCabe seeks absolution for his perjury and leaking through liberal politics. I stand with the liberal powerful against Trump, you can’t touch me — that’s the upshot of his defense. Comey has taken the same tack. The title of his forthcoming book should be: How the Law Doesn’t Apply to the Self-Appointed Ruling Class.

What an amazing collection of entitled creeps, who long ago convinced themselves that the “rule of law” is identical to what they see as their sacred right to exercise power in any way they see fit. All the blather about Trump’s violation of the law is simply a projection of their own lawlessness. So far the coup has been thwarted. They had hoped to stop him in the campaign through political espionage. But that didn’t work. Then they tried to upend him through spying during the transition, holding out hope until the very last moment, as evidenced by Susan Rice penning her sham exculpatory note only after Trump’s swearing-in. Now they join Brennan in seeking to bury Trump in Mueller’s dustbin.

Trotsky would have understood the shorthand of all the tweets, polemics, and posturing perfectly. Nothing in this show trial bears any relationship to reality or justice. It is simply an expression of power politics, which doesn’t always end well for its exponents. As even an old Gus Hall supporter like John Brennan must know, and perhaps his fulminating panic indicates a dawning awareness of it, those who talk the loudest about their enemies heading for the ash heap of history often end up in it.

Wikimedia Commons 

Original post: The American Spectator 
________________________
Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.


Simply Finding The Truth
We are being lied to on every front, both foreign and domestic. 

“We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand


While it is true that our "leaders" have been lying to us for decades, the current administration has elevated it to Orwellian proportions. The double think, news speak, prevarication, obstructionism, and out right perfidy that comes out of Washington D.C. is heart stopping.

Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Extortion 17 are just a few of the major lies and cover-ups pushed by D.C.

Executive over reach, and Congressional abdication of authority over to the bureaucratic alphabet agencies is in itself a scandalous breach of trust with its constituents.

The unbridled national debt wrought upon us by those in office is Cloward Piven on steroids, and its ramifications will be devastating.

Last but not least is the use of the IRS as a tool for punishment and harassment of those who are on the wrong side of the administration's political fence.

The harsh reality is that the America many of us grew up in and took for granted has now become a fascist state. We need to do our best to climb out of any boxes we may be in, thoroughly examine any assumptions we may be carrying, and search for the truth, bitter though it may be.

Knowledge is power. Even though we may feel powerless and may not see a restoration of our great country within our life time, we will hold and guard the truth so as to pass it on to future generations. They will then have the necessary knowledge to reclaim America when the time presents itself... 


Thursday, December 7, 2017

Hannity: Mueller investigation is epitome of the DC swamp


Last night I was watching my favorite Prime Time news show in Hannity. Sean Hannity’s opening monologue was AWESOME! Fox News (and a few other youtubers) posted the entire 12/6/17 show on Youtube. The Youtube of Hannity’s show is about 38 minutes long on the Davi Henrique Youtube Channel. The opening monologue begins roughly at the 2:25 mark.

The Hannity opening monologue is about Mueller and team being a Deep State manipulating operation with the goal of taking down President Trump. The Fox News Youtube Channel focuses just on the Opening Monologue and is about 16:55 minutes. Watch and be enlightened!

*******************

Posted by Fox News
Published on Dec 6, 2017


They want to overturn the election results because their preferred candidate lost miserably. 

Monday, March 10, 2014

BENGHAZI REVEAL PART ONE

Change to Believe in - Benghazi 4 Abandoned
CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN?
I am a great (or infamous depending on one’s outlook) cross poster of blogs or online news sources. One of my favorite people to cross post is the blogger Danny Jeffrey (older but still active – Freedom Rings 1776 and Fix Bayonets). In fact I have enjoyed Danny’s perspective so much that I noticed I was cross posting a lot of his articles. So I have slowed down on doing this.
 
I am on the email list of Fix Bayonets and a post crossed my eyes that Danny was sharing his outlook on Benghazigate. You may or may not agree with Danny’s perspective but he is very hard to refute except perhaps conclusions based on opinion more than facts. In the blogging world facts are like math – they don’t lie. However unlike math facts can be massaged to slant toward one’s perspective. Too much massaging may lead to the danger of turning facts into mirages; i.e. something you want to see but really is not there.
 
Whatever your take on Benghazigate Danny Jeffrey is one of the best sources to build an information base. Enjoy the read.
 
JRH 3/10/14
*************************************
BENGHAZI REVEAL PART ONE
 
By Danny Jeffrey
March 10, 2014 8:42 AM
 
Last year I wrote an essay about how little people really know about what is going on, due not to a lack of interest, but to the junk sites that from which they tend to get their information. I am about to prove it.

Benghazi is probably the most mentioned city in the world and has been for nearly the last two years. Everyone talks about, reads about it, posts about it and few know anything other than the fact that four men died there and it was due to Obama allowing them to die, for reasons of his own. Beyond those basics there is only confusion and conjecture. Still, in an effort to waken those who are trying to waken others I shall show you what real research can do and then hope you reconsider using some of the sources I provided in
'Wake Up America'.



In March of 2011 'Rebels' were involved in an attempted overthrow of Qaddafi. I emphasized 'Rebels' because most were not rebels as such. The vast majority of these people were paid militias, and a great many of them were Al Qaeda. The powers that be behind the Obama regime thought it best if we helped to topple a dictator and hand his nation over to Islamic radicals. The simple fact of the matter is that Robert Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff were opposed to our becoming involved in a war in Libya, citing no national interest. Credit our intervention to three women who overruled the JCS; Samantha Power, Hillary Clinton, and Susan Rice.

At any rate we became involved, with John 'Traitor' McCain leading the cheering section and CIA spook Christopher Stevens helping to arm the forces of Al Qaeda. Stevens arrived in Benghazi in the middle of the night aboard a Greek freighter. He spent the night in a hotel and moved the next day due to a car bomb going off in the parking lot.

I love using links from Obama's loyal media for when they concede something you know you have a live one on the line.



ABC tells us
...



Stevens, whose diplomatic foothold were a couple of battered tables, was literally on the rebels' side while the revolution was at its most vulnerable and in danger of being crushed by Gadhafi's troops who were moving on the city. The threat was pushed back at the last minute by the intervention of NATO planes which began bombing Gadhafi's tanks and troops.

At the risk of sounding disloyal I must ask; by what right and in whose interest did we do this? After Ronald Reagan had a bomb dropped in Qaddafi's front yard that little warlord learned some manners and actually joined us in the war on terror after 911. Not wanting another crater in his yard he had been helping to expose and eliminate Al Qaeda. Then we turned on him, aiding Al Qaeda in his overthrow and murder.

Paraphrasing Julius Caesar Hillary Clinton showed her true worth in this 12 second video as she said laughing
"We Came. We Saw. He Died.
" Qaddafi did not simply die. He was tortured and murdered. Raped with sharpened sticks at the hands of savages we empowered until he bled to death. And her victory chant tells me everything that I need to know about the woman that is being groomed for the Oval Office.

Christopher Stevens was rewarded for his efforts by being appointed Ambassador to Libya and he returned there in May of 2012 assuming his new role.

The following is a brief from the U.S. Department of State
entitled 'Securing Our Embassies Overseas'. It details the planning that goes into the safeguarding of our embassies abroad, its Ambassadors, support teams, and families. If this plan had been followed. Four Americans, now dead, would be alive today. The Obama regime intentionally disregarded all protocol and with malice aforethought allowed these men to be killed.

Excerpt:

Following the bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Nairobi (Kenya) in 1998, security countermeasures for our U.S. missions overseas took on greater importance, and this continues today.

Recall this excerpt as I later present a timeline of events as they transpired, for the State Department was far more aware of the danger than was the Ambassador as they removed his safeguards.
 
Another link from the State Department, this one describing the two types of mobile defense teams available to protect our ambassadors. One is referred to as a Security Support Team and their duties are described as:

A Security Support Team’s job is to augment and enhance security at U.S. Embassies and Consulates that are faced with civil unrest, hostile hosts or any other threat. Recent deployments included Yemen, Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Jamaica and Cote d’ Ivoire.

And the Tactical Support Team:

Tactical Support Teams deliver counter-assault capability in high-threat protective details both overseas and in the United States. Missions have included deployments to Niger, Zaire, Mauritania, Mali, Indonesia, the Philippines, Yemen, Pakistan, Tunisia and Jamaica.


One would tend to believe that with such support teams available an Ambassador should feel safe, but the fact of the matter is that the Security Support Team was removed and the Tactical Support Team was ordered to "Stand Down!"

Such executive behavior rings not of leadership but of premeditation.

There are a set of standards applied to any foreign mission site. Among them are three meter high walls topped with barbed wire. The building must be set back from those walls by a minimum of one hundred feet. That building must also be equipped with bullet proof glass, tactical doors, and a fire proof safe room. The site in Benghazi had none of the above and could only be operated under the terms of a special waiver from the State Department.

Again, calling upon one of Obama's lapdog's...

Excerpt:

By leaving the Consulate open for business with a waiver, it essentially meant that no barriers were required, no safe room was needed, and multiple layers of security weren't necessary.

The State Dept's waiver was mentioned in the Ambassador's diary which was recovered by CNN on site as the FBI was weeks getting there.

Then we have this video
on the topic from CNN as well. Note that such a waiver on such a facility had to be signed off not only by the State Dept, and Libya, but the Ambassador as well. Why was the Ambassador willing to agree to an unprotected mission in the very pits of hell? More on that topic later.

Recall the basic Security Support Team tasked with protecting the Ambassador. Calling yet again on the Obama loyal:

This from ABC...

I shall use no excerpt from this link as you should read all of it. It is by Jake Tapper, who pulls no punches.

U.S. Security personnel for the Ambassador were limited to three men and they were not allowed to carry weapons as we did not want to offend the 'sensitivities' of the Libyans. Their armed support was recruited from the February 17th Martyrs Brigade, but they were nowhere to be found on the night of September 11, 2012. F17MB has a Facebook page.

This from Newsmax...

Excerpt:

Several entries on the militia’s Facebook page openly profess sympathy for Ansar al-Sharia, the hardline Islamist extremist group widely blamed for the deadly attack on the mission. The State Department did not respond to a Newsmax request for an explanation as to why the February 17th Martyrs Brigade was hired to protect the mission.al


This is a one time (sic) cover from their FB page:
 
al qaeda from facebook
 
In Part Two the plot thickens. [Blog Editor: Part Two was completed today at 10:04 AM] Suggested Reading...

I have been frequently asked if it is alright to share my essays. By all means please do. The icons on the lower left allow you to email an essay, post it on a blog you follow, post to Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, or Google Plus.
_____________________________
AN INTRODUCTION TO 'FIX BAYONETS'
 
For the sake of long term readers, I must briefly explain my need for a new website:

I have an insurmountable problem with my previous blog that has to do with the 'feed'. Everything about it works just fine with the exception of it not being able to send Emails to my followers whenever I post a new essay. I have learned what caused the cumulative problem but am still unable to repair it, and so today I turn a new page. Armed with a new knowledge of how to avoid future problems, I am relegating Freedom Rings 1776
to a background archive, totally accessible but no longer serving my needs.

There is also a second reason for what I have begun. My first website was named with a sense of optimism, while this one is from a sense of desperation, for we are most assuredly losing in the political arena. Since Obama was first chosen by the Progressive overlords, we have been subjected to betrayal, deceit, a loss of liberty, and READ THE REST

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Obama, Iran and Nuclear War Part THREE

Soros Puppeteer - Obama Puppet
Danny Jeffrey has posted his Part Three of “Obama, Iran and Nuclear War.” Part Three delves deeper into reasons why Obama desires to create the situation that is favorable to a nuclear weapons exchange. By deeper I mean more than Iran and Israel having a nuke war. There is the exploration of the possibility of nuclear weapons being detonated on American soil. It is a part of the insidious plan for the New Word Order for security chaos to create the reasons for a Police State.

The players projected begins at the top with George Soros. Obama is the puppeteer-in-chief. The other rapscallion players are Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Samantha Power and John Kerry. He gives Janet Napolitano dishonorable mention in allowing the USA’s southern border to become porous so that not only Mexican Illegal Aliens flood across the border to inflate the Dem Party voting base, but also allowing Radical Muslim Terrorists to sneak into America. The Muslim terrorist component is important because of the capability of suitcase-equivalent nuke bombs to be smuggled into our National Soil.

Tied into this is Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. government through the some of the players mentioned above which might explain Obama’s insistence of covering up his nefarious tentacles in Benghazigate and the Syrian Civil War.

I am telling you this essay is LOADED with food for thought that makes a lot of sense. READ IT!

JRH 11/13/13
*********************************
Obama, Iran and Nuclear War Part THREE

By Danny Jeffrey
November 12, 2013 8:58 PM

In the first two parts of this series of essays I put forth what may sound like Limited Nuke Explosionan outlandish theory to some; it being that Barrack Obama is intentionally leading us into a nuclear war. It is not so very outlandish after all, for all of the pieces are now falling into place.

If you are a newcomer to these essays it would be best to read the two previous posts before beginning this one. Here are the previous links:



There is an old adage that in unity there is strength; quite true. That strength through unity holds true for not only in regards to a good cause but an evil one as well. Simply look to the people that Adolph Hitler surrounded himself with. Some of them may have deluded even themselves into believing that they were striving for the good of Germany, but the bottom line was their ruthless pursuit of power.

So too it is with the minions of Hussein Obama and his mentor George Soros. History shows us that there is no worse character flaw in a leader than a blatant willingness to abuse the power they possess, and history will reveal that the Obama gathering were all to willing to do just that.


What are you obsessed about? I can ask that question with confidence knowing that most everyone is obsessed about something. With some it is their children, their cat, their dog, their job, physical fitness, sex, alcohol, fast cars, or the environment. When it comes to Obama's circle of friends the primary obsession seems to be achieving power, with a secondary obsession of using that power to destroy the United States and Israel.


Let us examine that circle of friends. Obama is now in his second term
in office and some members of that group have changed positions, and so I shall address his allies of both terms, starting with everyone's favorite,Hillary Clinton next to Pakistan Flag - Crescent Moon & Star Hillary.
None that I know would be gullible enough to believe that Ms. Clinton is a Muslim, and yet her every move promoted Islam, at the expense of the U.S., Israel, and the entire West. If you are not familiar with UN Resolution 16/18 you must read 'If You Do Not Know What Resolution 16/18 Is Then You Are Asleep And In Danger'. If you read that essay you will begin to grasp the agenda of discarding our First Amendment and disallowing anyone in the world to discuss Islam; right in line with Orwell's vision of thought control.


Janet Napolitano, during her tenure as DHS chief, managed to keep our southern border open that illegals might enter unobstructed. This policy served a dual purpose, allowing both Democratic voting Hispanics to enter, as well as Islamic terrorists. She readily admitted before Congress that members of Hezbollah have indeed come to the U.S. across that porous border.


In my most recent essay 'Iran, Obama, And Nuclear War-Part Two' I discussed the great difficulty of Iran being able to successfully deliver a nuclear device to Israel, however it would not be at all difficult to transport it to a city in the U.S.. The border is open and our cities are unsecured.


Then there was UN Ambassador Susan Rice who did a whistle stop tour of all the talk shows blaming a crude video for the debacle in Benghazi when in fact the death of those four men was sanctioned to allow the flow of arms throughout the Islamic world. Today that UN post is held by Samantha Power who openly advocated that our troops should attack Israel on behalf of the Palestinians. In this video she states that our military should intervene to prevent the 'genocide' of the Palestinian people by Israel.


I have mentioned Clinton, Rice, and Power, so let us see how they work together. Our military is directed by a civilian government and the Commander in Chief is in no way duty bound to follow the advice of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but it is usually a pretty good idea to listen to their thoughts and act accordingly.


When Al Qaeda was attacking Qaddafi, the JCS advised Obama against any U.S. involvement as it was against our national interests. They were summarily ignored and Hussein heeded the council of the three women listed above, and sided with Al Qaeda, and we all know what happened from there. Libya fell, Qaddafi was raped and murdered, Western nations were expelled from Libya, and four Americans were sacrificed in the name of Allah.


Today we find Clinton gearing up for a Presidential run, Samantha Power has become the UN Ambassador, and John Kerry is Secretary of State, not trying to get Iran to end their nuclear agenda, but simply to slow down for six months. Now factor in the reality that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated our nation, they they are calling the shots with the DHS and directing our intelligence agencies, as well as being guests of honor in the White House.


No nuclear weapon has been used as an act of war since 1945. It therefore stands to reason that those nations who possess them do so largely as a defensive measure. Then came those Muslim nations who would violate that policy. First there was Iraq, that would have most certainly employed such weapons as an aggressive measure. Their ambitions were thwarted by Israel. Then came Syria, and again Israeli planes took to the air, eliminating yet another danger to world peace.


Now we are dealing with Iran and the world holds its collective breath hoping that once again Israel will fly to the rescue. However, Israel has long been an ally of the U.S. and they are under severe pressure from this administration to abstain from any military action while Iran proceeds with its terrorist agenda.


Obama continues to side with Islam against Israel, knowing full well that their ultimate agenda calls for an occupation and destruction of that tiny country, which is about the size of New Jersey. If Israel is defeated there is a drastic price to be paid. Obama is fully prepared, but I do not believe that the American people are.


Ask yourself if any nation is going to allow itself to be destroyed while in possession of a vast store of nuclear armaments. Israel keeps secrets, but our best guess is that they have between 85 and 200 nuclear devices. In one of my early essays I predicted that before Israel would suffer defeat they would launch any and all of those weapons on those who have attacked, and those who have betrayed them.


Later I found my prediction to be valid as Israel has in place a plan know as 'The Samson Option', see links here and here, and here. There yet remain a few survivors of The Holocaust, and both they and their descendants have taken a vow of "Never Again." Islam is threatening Israel, Obama and anti-Semitic nations of the West are pressuring Israel, and as the noose tightens nuclear war appears ever more likely, and Israel will not fall until they have completely expended their arsenal.


And therein lies the sheer insanity of the whole thing. Liberals and Progressives would not hesitate to categorize me as part of the lunatic fringe for my unshakable beliefs that Obama is pursuing a nuclear holocaust, but I await anyone who can project a future other than the one I put before you, based on all information available to us today.


The next essay in this series will discuss how Obama and his allies plan to gain from the advent of nuclear war.

One closing thought: Over my years of writing I have learned what an effect a title of an essay can have have on a potential readers. The mere mention of nuclear war will discourage many from reading this discourse. After all, one nuclear bomb can mess up your whole day. The fact remains that there us nothing we, as a people, can do that will alter the danger of a nuclear conflagration. The main difference I hope to make in writing of this is to mentally prepare those who will listen, for this eventuality. If I am correct about coming events those who choose to disregard the danger have about the same chance of surviving as the proverbial snowball in hell.

The following links were written between 2010 and 2011 and I have found no reason to change my opinion. In fact, today's events are only bearing witness to what I predicted then.

Suggested Reading



___________________________________

Some see, few know, many choose to wander aimlessly in a fog, devoid of sunlight. I seek the light of day and leave the others to their chosen realm of ignorance. They are the ones who have brought this great nation down. I write only for the benefit of those who possess the courage required to restore our birthright.