Leftist Defined

I found a great post about Leftists on the Secret Facebook Group PATRIOTS UNITED TO SAVE AMERICA posted by James Griffin. I don’t know if it is an original work or not, but it hits the nail’s head in defining an un-American Left Winger.

I edited the post in the hope of making better readability.

JRH 2/2/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

*******************

Leftist Defined

Posted by James Griffin

2/1/19 10:18 AM

Facebook Group PATRIOTS UNITED TO SAVE AMERICA

LEFTIST: One who supports globalism. Supports open borders.

Wants preferential treatment of invaders over natural citizens.

Supports deviant behavior over a normal family unit.

Hates the flag of their own country. Hates the laws of this land. Hates our Constitution.

Thinks America is evil.

Does not believe anyone should be held to account for their own actions.

Wants to blame society for one’s failings.

Thinks children should not be disciplined by parents or teachers. Thinks the government should be involved in parental decisions. Hates our Military. Thinks gender is a choice made after birth.

Supports pedophilia. Supports legalization of all drugs.

Wants the government to give education for free. Wants the Government to give free healthcare. Wants total government control over all citizens, Wants animal rights over human rights. Does not want free speech, Wants to shut down any opposing speech, Wants guns outlawed.

Supports radical Islam. Supports radical hate groups, Hates our police. Hates ICE. Hates our Border Patrol and any form of Law Enforcement. Supporter of the New World Order.

Stands against Christianity and the Jewish community.

Preaches tolerance, but is far from tolerant.

Hates Patriotism.

Thinks one small group of people should rule all countries.

Believes in high taxation.

Despises self-made millionaires.

Claims to believe in the American Dream, but is against anyone who has achieved the American Dream.

Elected official whose moves are above the Law. Elected officials that uses their position for self-monetary gain. Elected officials that represents themselves instead of those they are supposed to represent. Elected officials that do not honor their oaths of office.

Constantly divides groups of people and pits them against each other for personal political gain.

LEFTIST!!! Think about it, fellow Americans!! Are all Democrats Leftists? NO. Are some Republicans Leftists? YES.

All of our freedoms and rights are being systematically removed.

Where do you stand? I stand with our Founders, Our Constitution and Bill of Rights, And all who Stand for America.

Make your Choice.

ANARCHY: ITS PURSUIT AND ITS GOALS

Danny Jeffrey has written an essay that goes beyond the prediction of economic global chaos with the Left manipulating Islam to gain a New World Order supremacy. Danny provides how his predictions will play out. He does one thing different though. Danny makes an effort to provide an electoral rallying cry for 2014 as a last ditch effort to reverse the course in the USA – OR ELSE!

JRH 10/21/13

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

**********************************

ANARCHY: ITS PURSUIT AND ITS GOALS

By Danny Jeffrey

10/21/13

Let Freedom Ring 1776

 

Left and Right: What a confusing scenario. According to the views of most, the far left is Marxism, Communism, and Maoism, and on the far right we find Nazis, Fascists, and groups such as the KKK. No sane, moral, and decent person wants to be identified as being part of either the far left or the far right, leaving only a most awkward position of compromise between two evils; center of the road they call it.

I have long thought that Glenn Beck's blackboard should have received at least one award for journalism, or perhaps an Oscar for best supporting role. There simply is no justice in this world!

I recall once, while Glenn was still with FOX News, when he and his blackboard demonstrated the absurdity of the Left-Right paradigm and he proceeded to show the far left as any form of government that wielded an oppressive control over the people, and the far right as no government at all, i.e.: total anarchy. Accepting Glenn's left/right description we find the Communists, Fascists, and the Nazis all occupying their own niche of the far left. Nazi Party actually meant National Socialist Party, so call me skeptic, but I cannot help but feel that the scheme of putting Socialists both to the left and the right had a hidden agenda.
The Founding Fathers, fearing the iron clad control of a tyrannical government wrote a Constitution that put the fledgling nation as far from oppressive government control as they could. Experience is always the best teacher and they soon found that they had placed the nation too far to the right, and too close to a state of anarchy. New guidelines had to be adopted, and so the Bill of Rights was born, moving us a little closer to center, consequently and inevitably granting more control to a more centralized form of government.

You cannot have it both ways. There is no such thing as absolute freedom, as in the absence of some form of government control we experience total anarchy, which always results in mob rule. The whole purpose of government is to protect the people, with the catch 22 being that every government has a natural tendency to seek ever more power, and in time this leads not to protecting, but to enslaving the population. Gentle readers, we have reached that point. Slavery once again rears its ugly head as white people work and pay the taxes that allow many blacks and illegal aliens to sit at home texting on their Obama phones.
In two, perhaps two and a half years, all hell is going to break loose, and I can see the whole venue like it happened yesterday, and that will be the end of civilization as we know it. Were I to lay the blame for what is coming our way it would have to be with the apathetic and the delusional. The delusional people were suckered in by a patient philosophy developed by the Fabian Socialists, while the apathetic were so involved in their own little worlds that they failed to see what was taking place around them.

To understand communism today you must understand Fabian Socialism, as it has had a morphing effect on the communists methodology. Lenin and Trotsky were impatient to implement the philosophy of Marxism on Russia, and we all know how well that turned out. The Fabian Society sought the same end for the West but advocated a more gradual approach, thus they adopted the tortoise as their symbol.

The society was named after the Roman general Fabius Maximus whose duty it was to destroy Hannibal's legions. Considering what he was up against he chose a slow and deliberate tactic of hit and run ambushes biding his time until everything was in his favor.

The first pamphlet published by the Fabian Society contained the following statement:

"For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain, and fruitless."

The impoverished Russian peasants thought they had little to lose in supporting the communist revolution, but the Fabians were well aware that to bring Marxism to the prosperous West they would have to adopt a gradual approach. This tortoise plan began with them in England and Europe while the same agenda found root in America with the Progressives.

So few heeded the warning when people like Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney openly declared themselves to be Progressives. That is called apathy, and/or ignorance, and it is rampant in the United States, as people just don't want to know.

Allow me to use part of the above quote: "but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain, and fruitless."

It is my contention that time will come less than a year prior to the 2016 Presidential election, for Obama has no intention of leaving the White House, and he will indeed strike hard. The weapon to be used will be our economy. I do not believe that the hammer will drop before then as he is still building his forces and testing his techniques.

Today we are cranking out a Trillion non-existent dollars every year, while already seventeen trillion dollars in debt. Just a few days ago our national parks and monuments were declared closed because we had no money to keep them open, and he successfully blamed the GOP.

And yet...

From USA Today...U.S. quietly releasing $1.6B in Pakistan assistance

And...

From CBS News...U.S. training Syrian rebels in Jordan
And...

From CBS News...
U.S. training Syrian rebels at Secret Bases in Turkey
And...

From Jane's Defense Weekly...Training of Syrian insurgents steps up in Saudi Arabia

There is an old saying "East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet." Not true! They are meeting. They are meeting to enact the most diabolical plan ever hatched on the face of this planet; the enslavement of the entire human race. The oddity is that the Muslims of the East are also delusional, believing that the elite of the West will aid them in their pursuit of a new Caliphate. As a result of their being delusional they have become but another expendable tool of those elite who look down with disdain on all mankind.

The communists, the Fabians, the Progressives, all with slightly different agenda have come together under the umbrella of the New World Order, implemented by the U.N., and the ultimate trigger for that plan is none other than Barrack Hussein Obama.

Think back to the 2008 election when just prior to election day Obama was slipping in the polls and John McCain was surging ahead. Suddenly the economic bubble burst, hundreds of billions of dollars mysteriously disappeared from our economy and the whole thing, although engineered by the left was blamed on Republicans and Capitalists thus catapulting Obama into a landslide victory. What a coincidence that it happened right when it did. Or was it a coincidence?

Since then our economy has tanked, Europe is in turmoil, with some nations on the verge of total collapse, and the Euro is being bolstered at the expense of our soaring inflation.

Now, let us revisit Glenn Beck and his blackboard and I shall show you what is in store for us in two years.

As Glenn demonstrated, all totalitarian states are on the left with anarchy being on the right. The United States is becoming more totalitarian with each passing day and that harsh unopposed rule, Martial Law, cannot come into reality without the powers that be utilizing anarchy. The same thing is occurring in the U.K. and Europe as there is a near unregulated immigration of non productive (and dangerous) Muslims into those nations, draining away the wealth of the West, a process supported by their Progressive leaders.

Totalitarianism via anarchy is on the horizon and here is how it will come about.

The military is loyal to the American people and the Constitution. When the trigger is pulled they must be either destroyed or in a foreign land fighting another Obama war. Syria comes to mind.

Back here in the states, our Progressive government is going to implement an economic crisis that will make 2008 look like a mere hiccup. This will be a major collapse and it will be blamed on the conservatives. Just look at how successful they were in accusing conservative political leaders of being responsible for this last little crisis. A good share of even the GOP are up in arms against people like Ted Cruz and Luis Gohmert as they struck a blow for liberty.

The crisis to come will be one that includes a complete termination of Social Security payments, welfare, EBT and VA benefits. In short, chaos will reign when millions suddenly find themselves with no means of support.

Look at the recent EBT debacle. It was referred to as a glitch in the system, but it was not. That was dry run to test how people will react, and it only lasted a few hours. Think what will happen when the loss of those entitlements become the norm. Naturally the administration will manage, with the aid of the media, to shift the blame, targeting those who support responsible behavior.

When store shelves are empty, and starvation looms, the looting, rioting, burning, robberies and murder begin, and that is just the initial stage. Muslims only constitute a small percentage of our population but many of them are members of Hezbollah who have infiltrated our southern border, while others have trained in well documented terrorist training camps across America, and last year Obama imported 80,000 undocumented 'refugees' from Somalia. All have been strangely quiet, but that quiet will end when the chaos begins. We shall see snipers, forest fires, poisoning of our water supplies, and quite naturally bombings; their preferred weapon of terror.

One other little tidbit: The Somali immigrants seem to have an odd fascination with going to work with some of America's largest food processing operations. Though percentage wise small in number, Islam's ability to wreck havoc on this nation is staggering.

Think back to the Beltway Sniper. One sniper kept the nation spellbound and living in fear. Picture one of these murderers in every city in American. Now picture ten.

This will be when Martial Law is declared, the gun grab begins, and Obama becomes absolute dictator for the good of the country. And the funny part...Most Americans will be turning to the government to stabilize the situation that the government created.

When it reaches this point we have no hope of survival. People will kill you to take any food you have stored. If they know you have a gun, they will report you to Homeland Security for thirty pieces of silver or thirty cans of beans, and an armored vehicle will show up to knock your front door down.
America, we have less than two years to stop something that has been well planned and patiently growing for the last century. Now that patience is on the verge of bearing fruit. Read some of the essays below. We either get it together now, or we will most assuredly be torn apart in the near future.

Suggested Reading...

The Time For Civilized Debate Is Over

If This Doesn't Rock America, Nothing Will

Nudge, Shove, Shoot, Connecting The Dots

The Left/Islamic Agenda And A Coming CaliphateIslam...Soros...The Forest And The Trees. A Different Perspective 

__________________________

FREEDOM RINGS 1776 is a conservative voice, defending the views of those who still believe in the constitution and opposing any and all who would lead us from our tried and true beliefs. We who still believe in the spirit of 1776 must oppose anyone who would set this nation on a course that will fundamentally transform America.

Danny Jeffrey

AARP Leftist – AMAC Conservative

John R. Houk

© August 30, 2013

This is a paid ad from Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC) using the Dustin Stockman – Don’t Tread on Me website as the vehicle for the email (I have seen similar vehicles for AMAC). I am not an AARP member however I do use the AARP sponsored health insurance written by United Healthcare as a Supplemental Medical Insurance to the Medicare that I use.

AARP is the largest senior citizen advocacy group in America. My problem with AARP is that it has become a Leftist rubber stamp for the Democratic Party. Below is an excerpt from Discover the Networks on AARP:

While AARP describes itself as politically “non-partisan,” it consistently supports leftist initiatives that reflect Democratic Party agendas and AARP's own stated commitment to “collective purpose” geared toward “social change” advocacy. For example, the organization backs entitlements for migrant workers; favors a progressive tax structure that places a disproportionate burden on high earners; endorses the estate tax; opposes the privatization of Social Security; opposes the reformation of Medicare and Social Security entitlements; and favors strict gun control. In 2003, AARP lauded the passage of a massive Medicare prescription drug plan which added, by some measures, $15.6 trillion to America's long-term entitlement deficit.

In 2009 AARP lobbied heavily in favor of health-care reform, supporting in particular the “public option” which was favored by Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives but was dropped from the final legislation because it imperiled the bill’s passage in the Senate. AARP’s motives for backing the so-called “Obamacare” plan were as much financial as they were ideological. Because the legislation eliminated hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies from the Medicare Advantage program which allowed 11 million Medicare beneficiaries to buy additional benefits from private insurance companies, AARP foresaw that many of those people would now be in the market for products like its own “Medigap.”

A large number of AARP members felt betrayed by the organization's support for Obamacare. On July 28, 2009, for example, some 4,174 members called the organization to register their opposition to the proposed healthcare plan, while only 36 members called in support. The following day, the numbers were 2,656 opposed, 23 in support.

Seventy-one pages of emails released in September 2012 by the House Energy and Commerce Committee showed that throughout the Obamacare debates of 2009-10, AARP leaders—particularly policy chief John Rother, health policy director Nora Super (who later went to work for President Obama's Health and Human Services Department), executive vice president Nancy LeaMond, and senior vice president David Sloane—had been in constant contact with President Obama's top aides, most notably Nancy-Ann DeParle and Jim Messina. As the Wall Street Journal reports (READ ENTIRETY)

In my opinion this places the AARP as a Leftist minion of the Obama agenda and the Dems. This is where AMAC (Not to be confused with a similar acronym which is American Muslim Advisory Council which is a Radical Muslim connected organization) enters the picture. Here is an AMAC excerpt from their website:

…

We are the new senior organization.  And we need your help to grow.

AMAC was developed for anyone age 50 or above, and to provide discounts not available anywhere else.

Discounts for AMAC members include hotel and motel discounts at over 7,000 locations across the country, discounts to help you save on auto and homeowners insurance, and we’re working very hard to provide exclusive discounts in your local area.

Stores, restaurants, and business in your town and neighborhood are joining the AMAC merchant network to provide you with substantial discounts of 10% or more on products and services.  New merchants are joining every day (see our Frequently Asked Questions for more information on our local discounts efforts).  Our local discount offerings have been a home run on Long Island and Westchester, New York, as well as central Florida.  It is our goal to expand our local discounts program to every town in America.  Help us spread the word by asking your favorite local merchants to contact us about being included in the program!

…

We at AMAC feel it is time for the people to speak out for the traditional American values of faith, family, and freedom.  We promise to be your advocate to fight the good fight.  Please explore our website to learn how you can benefit by becoming a member.  Stand together with us. (AMAC about page)

Check out the subtitles on AMAC’s key issues page:

Our Stance on Key Issues

Taxes

AMAC strongly feels that American citizens are excessively taxed. There should be a reduction in income tax rates for all wage earners. Likewise, corporations are over taxed. When a corporation is …

Growth in Government

AMAC favors a reduction in the number of Federal departments and employees. Our government has grown at the Federal, State and local levels. In Washington we now have twice as many Departments as we had 100 years ago. As government grows …

Balanced Budget & the National Debt

The annual budget has gone out of control. The President and the congress have lost sight …

Medical Care

AMAC believes it is a serious mistake to have the Federal government interfere and dictate how medical care is provided in this country. The present system of State regulations and free enterprise has proven satisfactory for over 85% of our citizens. A simple change in …

Abortion

AMAC is pro-life. We are against abortion in principle …

Immigration

Amac believes in sensible Immigration Reform. We don’t believe in racial profiling or the harassment of legal immigrants. Amac is for legal immigration. There is …

Second Amendment- the right to bear arms

We believe that the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, is an integral part of our freedom.

AMAC supports the Constitution of the United States of America and our Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment.  Exercising the …

Fair Tax and Flat Tax

While AMAC has not taken an official stance on HR25/S13 or HR1040, we feel the American public should be aware of both options. AMAC believes … (READ ENTIRETY)

The point is AARP is Left Wing and is in love with big government which means too much power over the lives of Senior Citizens. The same organization and government that promises universal entitlement will be the same that toss unhealthy Seniors under the bus in deciding the poorer elderly serve no purpose as active members of society.

AMAC is for less government and showing ways to use the Free Market to make the costs of living longer an affordable situation even if the government begins to ignore you while unhealthy.

When AMAC becomes bigger with more members then it will also health insurance on a free market basis that will be competitive with AARP’s sponsored insurance (which Obamacare may eliminate because AARP sponsored insurance is a Free Market Supplemental Insurance).

Currently the best AMAC can do in Medical Care is to offer discount programs. For me that is not sufficient; however AMAC offers all the other perks and discounts that AARP members receive. Take note you don’t have to be an AARP member to participate in the Supplemental Insurance program they offer. You just have to be on Medicare to get the Free Market better coverage. So join AMAC. Help grow AMAC. Make AMAC membership an attractive competitor to AARP. Then AMAC will also be looked at by private insurance companies to offer a competitive plan for AMAC members.

Here is the ad I received in my email which is really an AMAC membership recruiting advertisement.

JRH 8/30/13

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

*******************************

AMAC vs AARP –Battling for the Hearts and Minds of Seniors

Sent via Stockton Breakdown

Sent: August 29, 2013 6:19 AM

If you haven't chosen AMAC over AARP yet, you may want to reconsider.

During the first Presidential debate, President Obama touted the support of AARP for ObamaCare several times. While AARP immediately responded by saying, "AARP is a nonpartisan organization and we do not endorse political candidates nor coordinate with any candidate or political party", recently released emails between the White House and AARP operatives seem to indicate that AARP threw their tremendous lobbying power behind the legislation despite the fact they were getting calls overwhelmingly against it.

In fact, on September 20, 2012, Kimberley A. Strassel of the Wall Street Journal wrote:

"Thanks to just-released emails from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, we now know that AARP worked through 2009-2010 as an extension of a Democratic White House, toiling daily to pass a health bill that slashes $716 billion from Medicare, strips seniors of choice, and sets the stage for rationing. We know that despite AARP's awareness that its seniors overwhelmingly opposed the bill, the 'nonpartisan organization' chose to serve the president's agenda.

The 71 pages of emails show an AARP management taking orders from the White House, scripting the president's talking points, working to keep its board 'in line' and pledging a fealty to 'the cause.' Seniors deserve to know all this, as AARP seeks to present itself as neutral in this presidential election."

Join AMAC Today

AARP refuses to take a formal position on the Independent Payment Advisory Board ("rationing board") portion of ObamaCare and even defends some aspects of the board. Given the negative impact that the IPAB will have on seniors, this is unbelievable (but sadly, not unexpected).

AMAC is against the harsh provisions in ObamaCare that gives the Federal government complete control of our healthcare. It destroys the best healthcare system in the world, takes 716 billion dollars out of Medicare, and has the power to restrict and ration our medical treatment.

AMAC is fighting to keep our right to receive treatment from our doctors without the interference of Federal bureaucrats.

Big government experiments like the "stimulus" and ObamaCare have only increased the uncertainty and instability, and are core reasons for the persistently high unemployment rate and why the household incomes of Mature Americans have declined so much.

AMAC, The Association of Mature American Citizens, believes we can do much better. As a steadily growing alternative to groups like AARP, and with an expanding influence in the Nation's capital, we aim to champion the interests of Mature Americans, seniors, and prospective retirees. We believe in religious freedom, free enterprise, and support common sense solutions to our Nation's largest challenges.

Bottom line - Our livelihoods, our families' future prosperity and our standards of living should not be threatened by bad policies emanating from Washington, DC.

AMAC Fights for You!

AMAC, the leading Conservative Alternative to AARP

Dan Weber, President and Founder of AMAC, delivers remarks with the House GOP Doctors Caucus the day the Supreme Court decided to uphold ObamaCare. Standing with Dan are (from left to right) Representatives, Paul Broun (GA-10th), John Fleming (LA-4th), Phil Gingrey GA-11th), Joe Heck (NV-3rd), Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25th), and Tim Murphy (PA-18th).

Join AMAC Today

As AMAC continues to grow and build a presence in DC, we're able to stand up to the tremendous lobbying power of AARP on behalf of concerned conservative Americans like you.

A senator told us, "You have got to grow AMAC!" When we asked him why, he said, "You don't understand, when AARP comes to our committees they say they represent older Americans. We know at times they really don't, but because of their numbers we have got to listen to them. When AMAC has one million members we can tell them they are not the only one we will listen to."

AMAC can do something AARP will not do - we'll fight against the horror of big government "solutions" like Obamacare with common sense solutions. But now, more than ever, AMAC needs your help!

If you want to belong to an organization that takes its marching orders from its members and speaks out for conservative values, JOIN AMAC!

For a limited time, a 5-year membership is available for less than $1 a month, and you'll have access to exclusive AMAC benefits - such as the members-only auto and home insurance program, access to licensed Medicare counselors, the AMAC Roadside Assistance Program, travel, and much more!

Better FOR YOU,

Better for America!

Join AMAC Today!

_________________________

AARP Leftist – AMAC Conservative

John R. Houk

© August 30, 2013

______________________

AMAC vs AARP –Battling for the Hearts and Minds of Seniors

AMAC Homepage

Christianity: Homosexuality is Barbaric

John R. Houk

© July 16, 2011

Gay activists and Leftist blogs are apparently all agog with horror over Marcus Bachmann’s comment that was to go something like gays are barbarians. Left Wingers jumped on the husband of Michele Bachmann as a homophobic racist. In this world steeped in political correctness such a statement is criticized as coming from a moron and a Presidential candidate that is married to a moron cannot be eligible for President.

This is the first I have heard of this Leftist-homosexual hullaballoo; however if Marcus Bachmann said such a statement in the context that Leftists are implying then more power to Marcus. I would add that the practice of homosexuality is a deviant ungodly act that should be condemned rather than to be praised as natural. Homosexuality is UNNATURAL.

Alas it appears Marcus’ comment was taken out of context. From a Christian perspective any lifestyle that leads to sin is a rejection of God. Homosexuality is not the only lifestyle practiced openly in America that is ungodly. Although anyone could name more but here is a biggie: Cohabitation outside the holy institution of matrimony of one man and woman is as callous a sin as a lifestyle of homosexuality. This is the context that Marcus Bachmann’s thought was spoken.

JRH 7/16/11

Special Election CA-36: Hahn v. Huey

Louis Zamperini

There is a Special Election vote for California District 36 for a Representative of the House tomorrow July 12, 2012. Frankly I did not have clue about this Special Election until I receive an email alert from Move America Forward Freedom PAC (MAF Freedom PAC) about the Democrat running for the Office as an anti-troop liberal. The Dem Liberal is Janice Hahn who has held Office a City Councilwoman from Los Angeles. The Republican in the race is relatively unknown Craig Huey.

The MAF Freedom PAC email mentions zero of Craig Huey running against Janice Hahn. The focus of the email is exposing Hahn as a liar by claiming an endorsement from veteran Louis Zamperini (Greater Detail of life) which Zamperini denounced as NEVER happened.

Since the email mysteriously did not mention anything about Craig Huey I took upon myself to read up on Hahn and Huey.

I discovered that Hahn is a ruthless politician that cherry picks favoritism to her donors according to what benefits her political career. The article I read about her claims Hahn is a moderate Left of Center gal taking donations from both corporations and Unions. Hahn’s greatest political weakness was an effort to rein in Los Angeles gangs by paying gang members to be involved in mediation efforts to bring a spot of peace to the streets. The gang plan sounded good as do many Left Wing Utopian programs with good intentions; however the Hahn involvement in the program was a complete failure as gang members took the money and ran back to their gangs undoubtedly laughing all the way.

Craig Huey has mysteriously made this race in CA District 36 a close one. The District is nearly all the way in the tank toward Leftist thinking. The Democratic Party run off may be the reason Huey is close. Janice Hahn used dirty-nasty politics against the Dem favorite in which … Read the Rest at SlantRight.com

BHO’s Brilliant Political Savvy

John R. Houk
© May 12.2010

I am beginning to realize that President Barack Hussein Obama’s nomination to replace Justice John Paul Stevens is a shrewd choice. It has been suggested by the ex-Navy Chaplain given the boot for praying in Jesus’ Name that Elena Kagan is a lesbian. Klingenschmitt is so convinced of Kagan’s homosexual lifestyle that he has put together a petition to oppose Kagan’s nomination based on her alternate lifestyle choices. It should be noted that the Obama Administration has denied a homosexual lifestyle choice by Elena Kagan. However here is one homosexual blog that believes Elena Kagan is a lesbian and would be extremely pleased to have a homosexual representative on the SCOTUS bench.

Now here is where BHO’s brilliance enters the picture. Elena Kagan is not universally liked by Leftists. The Leftists could care less if Kagan is a homosexually oriented person or not. The controversy looming for Leftists is that Kagan appears to lean toward the Right on issues of Executive power for the President (ala GW/Cheney, Patriot Act etc.). In the Leftist view, a Conservative’s use of Executive power to enable the Presidency more leeway in protecting American citizens is a criminal offense. Because of Kagan’s alleged affinity to a strong Executive Branch, there are many Leftists up in arms about Elena Kagan’s nomination to Supreme Court.

“… that replacing Stevens with Kagan risks moving the Court to the Right, perhaps substantially to the Right (by "the Right," I mean: closer to the Bush/Cheney vision of Government and the Thomas/Scalia approach to executive power and law).”

“Consider how amazing it is that such a prospect is even possible. Democrats around the country worked extremely hard to elect a Democratic President, a huge majority in the House, and 59 Democratic Senators -- only to watch as the Supreme Court is moved further to the Right? Even for those who struggle to find good reasons to vote for Democrats, the prospect of a better Supreme Court remains a significant motive (the day after Obama's election, I wrote that everyone who believed in the Constitution and basic civil liberties should be happy at the result due to the numerous Supreme Court appointments Obama would likely make, even if for no other reason).” - Glenn Greenwald, Salon

“Regardless of your particular views on these matters, that diversity is both vital and fair in the hiring process has long been a central plank in progressive thinking. It takes little creativity to imagine what Democrats would say about a Republican Supreme Court nominee with a hiring record similar to Kagan's. The question is whether they will be as consistent as these law professors are in applying their claimed beliefs to their own side. This is the issue that caused Linda Monk to rescind her endorsement of Kagan. Will Kagan-defending progressives now suddenly say that diversity is irrelevant? Will they try to claim that there were no qualified minorities for the Harvard Law School faculty? How will they reconcile everything they've always said about diversity with Kagan's record as Dean?”

“… choice is Kagan, you'll have huge numbers of Democrats and progressives running around saying, in essence: "I have no idea what Kagan thinks or believes about virtually anything, and it's quite possible she'll move the Court to the Right, but I support her nomination and think Obama made a great choice." In other words, according to Chemerinksy and Yglesias, progressives will view Obama's choice as a good one by virtue of the fact that it's Obama choice. Isn't that a pure embodiment of mindless tribalism and authoritarianism? Democrats love to mock the Right for their propensity to engage in party-line, close-minded adherence to their Leaders, but compare what conservatives did with Bush's selection of Harriet Miers to what progressives are almost certain to do with Obama's selection of someone who is, at best, an absolute blank slate.” – Glenn Greenwald, Salon

Here in lay the political brilliance of President BHO. Imagine a closeted homosexual that is Conservative on the SCOTUS bench. If Kagan is a closeted homosexual, it is doubtful anyone on the Senate Committee interviewing her will bring that up publicly. The reason for this is because it has been made politically incorrect to ask one’s sexual preference if the obvious answer is homosexual. The public outcry of bigotry and homophobia would be screamed by all those moral relativists that believe homosexuality is an inalienable right based on biology. (Incidentally this is one reason Secular Humanism, Homosexual Activism and Leftist thinkers are diligent to destroy Biblical Christianity. The reason is Biblical Morality is completely contrary to moral relativism.)

Also imagine a Conservative that is more secular minded than religious (there are many) and sees the potential of a Leftist nominee voting on the side of Slanted Right issues more often than not. That Conservative GOP will be inclined to vote to confirm a closeted homosexual Elena Kagan as a new Justice of the Supreme Court.

BHO’s brilliance lies upon the divide and conquer choice of his nominee to the Supreme Court. Certainly more Dems will go with their leader than not. It is fairly certain that some Republicans will vote to confirm a possible Slanted Right nominee from a Leftist President.

I am no fan of the Leftist transformation that President BHO is leading America toward; however if Elena Kagan is confirmed then this could be one of the premier political victories BHO has enjoyed since bucking the odds to win the Democratic Party nomination for President.

As long as Kagan does not step up and claim she is a homosexual and yet is a closet lesbian, how will she vote on some of the most divisive political issues facing America since the American Civil War? Would Kagan take up the torch for homosexual special rights over equal rights for all citizens? Would Kagan stay close to Conservative concepts of Free Speech and Religious Freedom over multicultural diversity? Would a Justice Kagan support Constitutional fuzzy concepts of security over civil rights when national security is at stake? Would Kagan become a Leftist stooge on the bench first for Obama and then later for Leftist leaders whether they are Presidential or Legislative? Would Kagan judicially consider the Constitution over her personal views and her political allies’ views?

No one on the Left or the Right could be certain of how Kagan will decide issues until the time arrives. THEREFORE, the unlikable President for a socialist-humanist transformation in America is politically brilliant. You gotta believe BHO has an inside track on how a Justice Kagan would decide cases before SCOTUS; however it would not be the first time that a confirmed Justice did not meet the appointee’s expectations if that does occur.

(If indeed Kagan is a lesbian, HERE is a good Conservative reason not to confirm her as a Supreme Court Justice.)

JRH 5/12/10 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)

Stevens: 'I never left sanity, sanity left me'

Justice John Paul Stevens is retiring. A Justice retiring is ultimately followed by accolades honoring his/her service to the nation. Ann Coulter thankfully steps off the political correct bus to explain Justice Stevens was a hypocritical activist Leftist ideologue. As most Leftists, Stevens took stands based on ideological expediency rather than Constitutional Law or precedent.

JRH 4/15/10

Islam Takes Advantage of Leftist PC

John R. Houk
© December 15, 2009

Political Correctness is a path that every Westerner consciously and unconsciously has practiced nearly on a daily basis. The concept seems to know no boundaries on the political spectrum that stretches from Left to Right.

The political spectrum often determines the degree of what is politically correct. An example might be that political correctness is determined through a filter of the political spectrum. That which is politically correct seems to be determined more by what is politically incorrect.

A Right Winger might feel politically incorrect extrapolating a goal from which is outside defined rules and defined conduct. A Left Winger might feel politically incorrect forced to extrapolate a goal solely on defined rules and defined conduct rather than discovering a potentially better goal that might be formed by the “now” situation of the collective will. The Right Winger is fine with change that falls within the parameters of perceived absolutes. The Left Winger is fine with change that falls within the parameters of relative realities which is felt to constantly evolve.

The society that seems to survive is one that has achieved a balance between perceptions of the absolute and relativity. When one totally squelches the other, society tends to unravel. So it is not as important to determine which is better between absolute and relativity. Rather what is important is to recognize a balance needs to be discovered between the absolute and relativity.

I am not suited to write a philosophical treatise on the effectiveness of a society balanced in the absolute and relativity. Rather I am writing this hypothesis that drives both scientists and philosophers nuts. This hypothesis is based on gut feeling.

My gut feeling is that Western society is out of balance. As a Right Winger I am guilty of believing that relativity coupled with politically correctness is way too dominant. This kind of political correctness dilutes morality to the point that the bad and ugly far outweigh the good. This kind of political correctness blinds society into accepting practicing ideologies (secular and religious) that are inimical to the progress of Liberty and Freedom in the West. This blindness has affected leadership in the West by allowing ideologies in the name of Liberty and Freedom which actually destroy Liberty and Freedom.

A Left Winger might view this unbalance as the intrusion of the concept of the absolute resisting the evolution of the collective into a better society. I’m a Right Winger not writing a philosophical treatise so I am not going there.

There are probably a number of paths my unscientific subjectivity could lead me. I could complain of the Western ruling elites wittingly or unwittingly focused on making the faith of Christianity irrelevant furthering progress of a Left Wing utopian multicultural and diverse harmony. (Interjection: sounds like an oxymoron, does it not?) This would take me down the path of removing Christianity from the public forum in addition to including alternate lifestyles (such as homosexuality) as morally acceptable to a normal society. The thing that is on my mind at the moment is a short Bill Warner essay I read entitled, “Questions for Every Muslim”.

Warner writes about how political correctness has failed American society (by extension include the West). Political correctness places the powers that be into an uncomfortable zone when it comes to asking the correct questions to ascertain an answer beneficial to American society.

America’s Muslim minority is beginning to go Mohammed medieval in American society. There are cases of honor killings that the government and the MSM have been reluctant to label as honor killings. This denial has the potential of placing a young Christian convert (aka Muslim apostate) in danger by forcing her to live with her Muslim parents.

Homegrown terrorism has been on the rise in America which the Bush Administration had been lucky enough to nip in the bud in most instances with the public having little to no knowledge of. Notice more and more of these instances of Islamic homegrown terrorists are coming into the public eye. The MSM have been reluctant to label obvious acts of Islamic violence as associated with the teaching of Islam.

The Ft. Hood Massacre exacted by Muslim-American citizen Nidal Hasan is an example. Muslim apologists have been quick to label Hasan’s massacre as the act of a singularly disturbed man. Muslim loving Leftist (Diversity don’t you know) apologists have gone to great length to back the disturbed man profile. The more scrutiny into Hasan’s activities prior to his murder of kafir (Allahu Akbar) demonstrates he was guided by classic Islamic principles.

There are many Islamic incidents in America. The most recent was the capture of Muslim-American citizens in Pakistan looking for terrorist training to come back home seeking to follow Hasan’s path of killing non-Muslim Americans. Ultimately this is following the example of Islam’s purportedly perfect human being – Mohammed the blood thirsty prophet.

Political correctness and the Leftist misguided utopian concept of diversity actually are allowing Muslims following the example of Mohammed to plan the demise of the American Constitutional experiment. With this in mind Warner puts forth a series of questions for Muslims that he feels might pass the muster of the need for political correctness. Warner believes the questions are unintrusive as to not offend the Muslim mind yet should draw obvious conclusions to comprehend that Islam is diametrically opposed to American concepts of Liberty and Freedom.

JRH 12/15/09