SlantRight 2.0: Dem Criminals

Showing posts with label Dem Criminals. Show all posts

Thursday, January 1, 2026

What to do About Dem Inspired Criminals & Govt. Corruption?

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© January 1, 2026

I’ve been predicting – and perhaps wishful thinking - American Patriots will become so upset with American government corruption (especially in Dem-managed States and/or Dem-managed cities) that civil strife could break out between Original Intent Constitution Patriots and Fundamental Transformation supporting Dems (who are closer to Communists these days).

To be fair, there is a lot of skepticism to my sentiment. One fellow Conservative responded thus to my thought that WE-THE-PEOPLE need to arise eventually to blatant government corruption (Dave via WorldNewsChat@groups.io in response to my Substack post, “Somalis Scamming American Taxpayers”):

“Are you Suggesting we grab our 2nd Amendment Arms, and go Hunting enemies of the People?

The System we have for Government is set up for the Police, the FBI or others to keep Enemies from ever crossing our Boarders. Obviously, someone somewhere has planned this infiltration on our Nation, and has been importing enemies for several decades.

It isn't that I think we should do nothing, and Hope America's experience with Islam is much different than any other Nation invaded by this group and along with others that have a History of Evil intentions.

But, at this point, I have No real plan that I believe would be carried out by our FBI, national Gard, and the Police.

Plus our Media would report such effort to draw the Pictures that our enemies are Victims and the enforcers are now the Mean Bullies bringing such hardship to those who just want their children to gain a good education and to live the American Dream Peacefully.

So, we start with who first? The Somali's? Sure, gotta start somewhere. Then who? All those folks in Deerborn? Then who? How about removing and dissolving the Citizenship of all of the Radical Democrats? Now my eyes are starting to Sparkle!

And while we are at it, how about our own Citizens who abuse, for decades, Government Handouts, and who are never Happy, and are still demanding even more? How about dissolve their Citizenship, and fly them somewhere else?

If we did all of this, the Crimes, the Corruption, and the numbers of people who seem to Dream of destroying our country, would be a lot smaller.

We could solve a respectable list of known issues that never seem to be addressed.

Now is this ever going to be done? If it were to happen as I've described, I for one would be thrilled, but Shocked at the same time.

However, I do expect the reverse of this happening if Democrats ever return to the White House. they have been salivating for years when it comes to removing those they view as Enemies of the State. That by the way would include you and I along with a lot of other people who want their Country back.

So when you suggest we should do something, what exactly are you hoping for us to be doing?”

These are significant thoughts by Dave. He reflects on a “want” to return to the Constitutional Republic, punish the criminals, and disenfranchise naturalized citizens who become criminals. AND YET reflects the Dems are a (fraudulent) election away from regaining power and reinstitutionalizing the Constitution-shredding Fundamental Transformation of America.

Dave’s thoughts reflect a growing pessimism among Conservatives, Patriots and the MAGA crowd in general.

How do we RESTORE the Constitution’s Original Intent [VIEWS: HERE, HERE & HERE]? How does the USA revitalize the Rule of Law with ALL the Government Branches (Executive, Legislative, Judiciary & State governments) so infected with a Dem-oriented Bureaucracy dedicated to America’s Fundamental Transformation to Globalist Cultural Marxism? There is some serious 50/50 division in America. How is the sovereign Republic preserved when half the nation is willing to along with a sovereign-destroying TRANSFORMATION?

Dave ended his thoughts with this question: “So when you suggest we should do something, what exactly are you hoping for us to be doing?”

Frankly, my answer was weak. I’m not exactly a giant Conservative ideologue with an awe inspiring capability. I wrote back:

“I'm hoping for mass citizens to rise up and peacefully yet loudly protest at inconvenient to ineffective government locations (local, state & federal). When the police response is unacceptable, then stand our ground as in the Civil Rights Movement Days or even as Pre-Revolutionary War days. [In order] To catch the imagination of the nation. THEN either reform will occur or as you say, a "2nd Amendment" moment will probably follow.” (The text in brackets was added for this post)

I pray awe-inspiring Patriots arise with a more concrete plan of action TO LEAD and Preserve the Constitution and the Republic! ARE YOU OF A GROUP OF PATRIOT LEADERS?

JRH 1/1/25

ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store:

https://dianawellnessstore.com

>>HAPPY COFFEE & POWER of 3<<

Tuesday, March 3, 2020

Judge Lambeth Orders Crooked Hillary Deposition

Judge Royce C. Lamberth rules Crooked Hillary must face an in-person deposition from Judicial Watch over her illegal mail server that corrupt FBI Director James Comey gave her a pass. Hopefully enough dirt is exposed in this deposition that not even Teflon Dem crooks have to face jury trials.

Below is the Fox News and Judicial Watch versions of the Crooked Hillary deposition news.

JRH 3/3/20

Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit, check

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business –

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

***************************

Federal judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition to address private emails: 'Still more to learn'

By Ronn Blitzer

March 2, 2020

Fox News

A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business.

Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about this and should not have to do so again -- the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation -- but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.

"As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business," Lamberth said.

The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, "those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Lamberth said that using written questions this time “will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.”

Lamberth even gave some examples of lingering questions about Clinton's emails, such as how did she come to believe that her private emails would be preserved under normal State Department processes, who told her this and when, at what point did she learn department records management officials did not know about the server, "[a]nd why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?"

The ruling comes after Judicial Watch revealed at a December 2019 status conference that the FBI released "approximately thirty previously undisclosed Clinton emails," and that the State Department "failed to fully explain" where they came from.

The State Department has been pushing for the discovery phase of the case to come to a close, but Lamberth said he is not ready to do so, saying that "there is still more to learn."

Judicial Watch, which initiated this case in 2014, is looking for information regarding whether Clinton used her private email server to intentionally get around the Freedom of Information Act, whether the State Department acted in bad faith when they tried to settle the case years ago, and whether the department had adequately looked for records in response to Judicial Watch's initial FOIA request.

Given that the settlement attempts and records search took place after Clinton left office, the judge ruled that the deposition should focus on whether she intentionally tried to use her private server to evade FOIA and her understanding of the State Department's record management requirements.

Lamberth also granted Judicial Watch's request to depose former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Paul Combetta who was involved in deleting Clinton's emails, as well as Brett Gittleson and Yvette Jacks, who were State Department officials familiar with Clinton's private email server.

Judicial Watch also wanted to question Clinton and Mills about government talking points in the aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attack. Lamberth said that while they "cannot be questioned about the underlying actions taken after the Benghazi attack," they can face questions regarding "their knowledge of the existence of any emails, documents, or text messages related to the Benghazi attack."

Fox News' Bill Mears contributed to this report.

++++++++++++++++++++++

Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

Crooked Hillary JW Photo

Press Releases

March 02, 2020

Judicial Watch

Court: ‘It is Time to Hear Directly from Secretary Clinton’

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch today announced that U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills and two other State Department officials.

Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

The ruling comes in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that seeks records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the “talking points” that provided the basis for Susan Rice’s false statements were created by the Obama White House. This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

In December 2018, Judge Lamberth first ordered discovery into whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court also authorized discovery into whether the Benghazi controversy motivated the cover-up of Clinton’s email. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” The State and Justice Departments continued to defend Clinton’s and the agency’s email conduct.

Judge Lamberth today overruled Clinton’s and the State and Justice Department’s objections to limited additional discovery by first noting:

Discovery up until this point has brought to light a noteworthy amount of relevant information, but Judicial Watch requests an additional round of discovery, and understandably so. With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers.

Additionally, Judge Lamberth said that he is troubled by the fact that both the State Department and Department of Justice want to close discovery in this case:

[T]here is still more to learn. Even though many important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department inexplicably still takes the position that the Court should close discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The Court is especially troubled by this. To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous, especially when considering State’s deficient representations regarding the existence of additional Clinton emails. Instead, the Court will authorize a new round of discovery

With respect to Clinton, the court found that her prior testimony, mostly through written sworn answers, was not sufficient:

The Court has considered the numerous times in which Secretary Clinton said she could not recall or remember certain details in her prior interrogatory answers. In a deposition, it is more likely that plaintiff’s counsel could use documents and other testimony to attempt to refresh her recollection. And so, to avoid the unsatisfying and inefficient outcome of multiple rounds of fruitless interrogatories and move this almost six-year-old case closer to its conclusion, Judicial Watch will be permitted to clarify and further explore Secretary Clinton’s answers in person and immediately after she gives them. The Court agrees with Judicial Watch – it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton.

“Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal and we’re pleased that the court authorized us to depose Mrs. Clinton directly on her email conduct and how it impacted the people’s ‘right to know’ under FOIA,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

++++++++++++++++++

__________________________

Federal judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition to address private emails: 'Still more to learn'

______________

Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

Saturday, November 17, 2018

Dem official’s attempted use of bogus altered ballots in Florida...

If you hear or read a Dem or Mainstream Media Operative tell you there is not a smidgen of evidence of voter fraud in the Florida election, just like their fearless leader in the last Administration – THEY ARE OVERTLY LYING!

Here are the details:

JRH 11/17/18

In this current state of media censorship & defunding, consider

chipping in a few bucks for enjoying this Blog.

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

**********************

Dem official’s attempted use of bogus altered ballots in Florida a serious offense, could trigger RICO probe

By Samantha Chang

November 17, 2018

BizPac Review

Voter fraud is apparently rampant in Florida based on bombshell emails uncovered by USA Today. A Democrat Party official “directed aides to share altered election forms with voters in an effort to fix ballot signature problems a day AFTER polls closed,” according to the damning emails.

Election experts say use of the altered forms — which turned up in four Florida counties — was apparently an effort to boost the number of Democrat votes in the state’s hotly-contested gubernatorial and Senate races.

The deadline in the forms was retroactively altered to read November 8. Here’s what the altered forms look like.

ALTERED INSTRUCTIONS

Here’s what the original forms looked like. It directed voters to return the mail-in ballot by November 5.

ORIGINAL INSTRUCTIONS

Altering state forms is a criminal offense, and the Department of Justice is investigating the bogus mail-in ballots pursuant to a referral from the Florida Department of State.

A GOP lawyer told Breitbart the bogus ballots could be grounds for a potential RICO (organized crime) investigation.

The ploy even disgusted Democrat campaign consultant Jake Sanders, who said he had warned party officials about the illegality of using altered ballots, and was ignored.

“Self-imposing a fake deadline and deceiving people is counter to [standing up for voters],” Sanders told USA Today.

Election expert Charles Zelden said this deception could be construed as a reckless “Hail Mary effort” on the part of the Democrat Party to rig the election.

“If this is an attempt at fraud to sneak in votes that would have not been counted otherwise…it does play into the narrative of Republicans that this is a fraudulent effort,” said Zelden, a political science professor at Nova Southeastern University in Florida.

Congressman Matt Gaetz of Florida has repeatedly warned that Democrats are trying to “steal the election.”

VIDEO: Congressman Matt Gaetz of Florida Warns Dems Try to Steal Election

[BPR Original Video Link: https://i.rmbl.ws/s8/2/m/D/m/R/mDmRa.baa.1.mp4?b=0&u=bt1g]

______________________

We know first-hand that censorship against conservative news is real. Please share stories and encourage your friends to sign up for our daily email blast so they are not getting shut out of seeing conservative news.

Samantha Chang is a politics/lifestyle writer and a financial editor. She is a law school graduate and an alum of the University of Pennsylvania. You can find her on Twitter at @Samantha_Chang.

DONATE