Exposing Georgia 2020 Election Fraud

Trump FBI Raids 

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 12, 2026

Fulton County FBI raid prompted by Trump 2020 election lawyer’s criminal referral (msn.com Photo)

 

Dementia Joe Biden was installed as President in 2020 with probably the most corrupt election in U.S. history. Regardless of the Mockingbird Media and Leftist Fact Checkers asserting a fair and secure election, the expose Documentaries and a corrupt Judiciary denying plaintiffs based on Standing and ignoring evidentiary substance.

 

As of 12/12/25 the fact checker site factually.co was/is still asserting Election 2020 was “free and fair”:

 

“Independent election-security experts and multiple nonpartisan organizations concluded the 2020 U.S. presidential election was secure and without evidence of widespread fraud; CISA called it “the most secure in American history” and the Brennan Center reported the election was “one of the most secure elections in our history” ^{[1] [2]}….”

 

NOW! The Trump controlled FBI might be finally exposing that Election 2020 corruption by raiding one of the pivotal States in that election – FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA. From the preceding embedded news link is a local WXIA Atlanta News story on the Affidavit which I am uploading to my Bitchute and Rumble Channels:

 

Bitchute/Rumble VIDEO: Search Warrant Affidavit in Fulton County Election Hub Raid Unsealed

[Posted by SlantRight2/SlantRight

Published February 11, 2026]

 

Below is some information based on a recently released DOJ Affidavit giving cause for the FBI raid.

 

Frankly, it is my opinion that the U.S. Government is so tainted in Dem Bureaucratic corruption that I do not expect any legal accountability to be dished out. BUT it will be extremely gratifying for me when Voter/Election Fraud is proven with the LIARS exposed.

 

JRH 2/12/26

ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income. A brief advertisement change. Diana & I are Changing from Happy Healthy Coffee to Magic Coffee. It’s MAGIC because there is a weight loss or weight control emphasis. Clicking the Diana Wellness Store will take you to the NEW store. CLICK JOIN. Register for free to be a customer then look for SHOP tab. OR decide on a level to enter to Network your own Store. DRINK COFFEE and/or MAKE MONEY!:

 

https://dianawellnessstore.com

 

*******************************

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️

 

The Fulton County Georgia FBI Raid Affidavit CONFIRMS Manipulated Election Records in Fulton County's 2020 Vote Count

Affidavit Screengrab with Trump ‘Told You So’ (Patriot Underground)

 

Telegram Patriot Underground

February 10, 2026

 

1. Only 16 tabulators out of an expected much larger number were used to generate closing data for about 315,000 ballots across 138 provided poll tapes. This extreme concentration improperly funneled through a small set of machines, breaking chain-of-custody rules and making it easier to alter election results

 

2. Review of machine logs indicated that memory cards were likely removed from their original tabulators and inserted into different ones to produce or recreate closing poll tapes. This indicated tampering or fabrication of records to cover up discrepancies, as it allows data to be manipulated OUTSIDE the standard process.

 

3.  Many closing poll tapes—essential documents that verify end-of-day vote totals from each polling site—were entirely MISSING from the records provided. Without these, there's no way to confirm that votes weren't added, removed, or changed post-election. FRAUD.

 

4. It was discovered that the Tabulator's data appeared to cover ballots from several different polling sites, which shouldn't happen under normal procedures. This suggests intentional mixing of data streams, which leads to DUPLICATE votes, misplaced ballots, or hidden errors across precincts.

 

5. Tabulators showed mismatched or anomalous timestamps in their logs, such as dates and times that didn't align with actual election events. This could indicate backdating, editing, or unauthorized access AFTER polls closed, further hinting at possible manipulation to make records appear consistent.

 

6. Auditors assisting in the Risk Limiting Audit reported counting purported absentee ballots that had never been creased or folded, as would be required for the ballot to be mailed to the voter and for the ballot to be returned in the sealed envelope requiring the voter’s signature for authentication.

 

Affidavit (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.355087/gov.uscourts.gand.355087.22.2_3.pdf)

 

++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute/Rumble VIDEO: People are ILLEGALLY Registered to Vote in Fulton County Georgia 

Posted by SlantRight2/SlantRight

Published February 11, 2026

 

I found this exposé at Telegram Sergeant News Network (https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork) posted there on 2/10/26 (https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/124768).

 

Sergeant News Network Description:

 

“HOLY SMOKES. It just got exposed by David Khait that people are ILLEGALLY registered to vote in Fulton County, Georgia at

- A juror parking lot

- A youth homeless shelter

- Empty lots

- Construction sites

- A park”

 

++++++++++++++++++

FBI has 'substantiated' irregularities in Georgia 2020 vote counts, probing if they were intentional

FBI identified to court in a search warrant five categories of confirmed irregularities in Fulton County voting, unsealed affidavit.

 

By Steven Richards and John Solomon

Published: February 10, 2026 4:31pm

Updated: February 10, 2026 7:36pm

Just The News

 

The FBI has "substantiated" some major irregularities in how votes were counted in Georgia's largest urban area in the aftermath of the 2020 election and is probing whether those failures were intentional efforts to violate federal election law, according to a bombshell affidavit unsealed by a federal court on Tuesday.

 

FBI Special Agent Hugh Raymond Evans first filed the affidavit last month to establish probable cause for a raid that seized about 700 boxes of Georgia 2020 elections ballots from a storage warehouse in the Atlanta area, after getting a referral from Trump White House election integrity czar Kurt Olsen.

 

The affidavit included information gleaned from FBI interviews with about a dozen unnamed witnesses recounting various allegations that dated back to the disputed 2020 election in Georgia in which Joe Biden was narrowly declared the winner over Donald Trump.

 

"Some of those allegations have been disproven while some of those allegations have been substantiated, including through admissions by Fulton County," Evans wrote. "This warrant application is part of an FBI criminal investigation into whether any of the improprieties were intentional acts that violated federal criminal laws."

 

Many of the substantiated allegations were previously reported by Just the News over the last five years based on its review of ballot records.

 

Evans' affidavit, dated Jan. 28, cited five major areas of irregularities under investigation, including that:

 

§  Fulton County has admitted that it does not have scanned images of all the 528,777 ballots counted during the Original Count or the 527,925 ballots counted during the state's first recount, a major loss of evidence.

 

§  Fulton County has confirmed that during the Recount of votes, some ballots were scanned multiple times. "Ballot images made available in response to public record requests show ballots with unique markings duplicated within the ballot images," the affidavit said.

 

§  During the Risk Limiting Audit, auditors counting the votes by hand reported vote tallies for batches inconsistent with the actual votes within the batch. "The State’s Performance Review Board reported that Secretary of State investigators confirmed inaccurate batch tallies from the Risk Limiting Audit," the affidavit said.

 

§  Auditors assisting in the Risk Limiting Audit reported counting purported absentee ballots that had "never been creased or folded, as would be required for the ballot to be mailed to the voter and for the ballot to be returned in the sealed envelope requiring the voter’s signature for authentication."

 

§  On the day of the deadline to report the Recount results, Fulton County reported a recount totaling 511,343 ballots, 17,434 ballots fewer than the original count. "The following day, Fulton County then reported a total of 527,925 ballots counted," the affidavit noted.

 

You can read the unsealed affidavit below: 

File - gov.uscourts.gand_.355087.22.1.pdf

 

Just the News reported in 2021 that a contractor sent to Fulton County to observe voting on behalf of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had chronicled widespread confusion, mistakes and irregularities in the vote count, a fact the affidavit cited. Gov. Brian Kemp also referred Fulton County for investigation for miscounting ballots based on information from Just the News.

 

Despite the concerns, Raffensperger insisted none of the problems affected the outcome of Biden defeating Trump in the state.

 

But one of the witnesses in the FBI affidavit, identified as Witness 4, was a top lieutenant to Raffensperger and acknowledged to the FBI he was unaware of some [of] the corroborated irregularities and admitted they were possibly problematic.

 

"The Director of Elections for the Georgia Secretary of State in 2020, was not aware of physical ballots not matching the number of ballot images. Wit. 4 said a discrepancy like that would be problematic but did not know if anyone went back and checked that," the affidavit said.

 

"Wit. 4 said during the hand count, they did not audit for issues like image discrepancies. He said the images are just duplicates. It would be more concerning if there was discrepancies between physical ballots and voter count. The concern is less about the images and more about the ballots and voter count," it added.

 

© 2026 Bentley Media Group, LLC

Just The News HOMEPAGE

 

An Intro to ‘Was January 6 an Insurrection?’

Intro by John R. Houk

© January 13, 2025

Title by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

Lew Rockwell posted something today referencing the shenanigans that took place with Election 2020 to wit I highly concur with. NAMELY, very fraudulent and very tainted and yes --- STOLEN.

 

Rockwell runs over the info of Election Fraud condemned by brainwashed Dems and RINOs that were never actually heard in Courts under the BS of Standing rather than dare to adjudicate the legit Merits. [YOU SHOULD WATCH 2000 MULES as a beginning] Even today, I’ve noticed Search Engines (beyond the typical Leftist Google, Bing & Yahoo] still bring to the top that Election 2020 was free, fair and legit. The Search Engines are devoid of contradicting Conservative opinion. [I had to go to page 3 of Duck-Duck-Go to find the KiwiBlog linked above to find one contradicting opinion. Zero of my blog posts showed up in any Search Engine I used.] Then Rockwell dives into the J6 LIES.

 

As the Deep State-Dem-RINO-Mockingbird Media begins its campaign to once again delegitimize a President Donald Trump, hearken back to back to the Rockwell opinion and REMEMBER – There is an American Republic and Originalist Constitution to fight for and to preserve.

 

JRH 1/13/25

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com

>>DRINK COFFEE-MANAGE WEIGHT or MAKE SOME EXTRA CASH<<

*********************************

Was January 6 an Insurrection?

 

By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

January 13, 2025

LewRockwell.com

 

This past January 6, a joint session of Congress certified the election of Donald Trump as president. The event was ceremonial, as everybody knew right after the November election that Trump had defeated Kamala Harris, whose efforts to fill in for dead “President” Joe Biden, had been a miserable failure, in an overwhelming victory. It was ironic that Harris, presiding over the session, had to read the tally of her own defeat.  January 6, 2021 was not at all like that. There was credible evidence that the election of 2020 had been stolen from Trump, and he and his supporters were not about to go quietly.

 

Let’s first look at the evidence the election was stolen.  According to Paul Craig Roberts: “The official narrative that there was no election theft is likely the largest lie ever perpetrated on the world.  The lie is so vast and so fragile that everyone who disagrees with the official narrative is suppressed, deplatformed, kicked off social media, ostracized, and fired from their job in order to protect the lie from examination and exposure.  In Michigan the state attorney general is attempting to debar attorneys who represented cases of electoral theft. Massive effort was made—including an orchestrated “storming of the Capitol”—to insure that the evidence would not be presented and that the majority of the population would never encounter the evidence.  The presstitutes from the first instance declared continuously with one voice ‘there was no vote fraud,’ ‘baseless claims of vote fraud,’ and the old standby ‘conspiracy theory.’

 

Obviously, if there was no fraud, there would have been no danger in examining ‘baseless claims.’  Their baselessness could simply have been demonstrated.  If the claims of electoral fraud are baseless, there was no need to spilt the country and to cause half of the voting population to distrust the public institutions that are supposed to uphold election integrity Even without hard evidence of a stolen election, it is obvious that Trump did not lose to Biden who inspired no enthusiasm and whose campaign events had to be halted due to non-attendance. How did Trump lose the election when on December 29, after two months of his heightened demonization following the November 2020 election, he won the annual Gallup survey as America’s most admired person, ending Obama’s 12-year run. According to the official vote count, Trump received 11 million more votes in 2020 than the number he won in 2016 and three times the black support. In 2020 Trump received 8 million more votes than Obama received in 2012 and Hillary received in 2016.  It is not possible that this extraordinary performance is a losing one.  And this is his official vote count, not his suppressed actual vote.

 

No sane person believes that such an uninspiring candidate as Biden garnered 81.2 million votes—15.3 million more popular votes than Obama in 2012 and Hillary in 2016.  The Obama-Hillary popular vote of 65 to 66 million is the limit of the Democrat vote. Even Trump’s losing official vote count of 74 million is larger than any winning president in American history other than the fraudulent 2020 Biden vote count.

 

In other words, no voting machine or other material evidence is needed to see that the 2020 election was stolen.

 

Nevertheless, there is massive evidence.  Giuliani collected a lot of it, and it was presented to members of state legislatures in swing states.  I watched presentations of the evidence by highly skilled analysts and sworn witnesses.  In previous postings on this website there are links to the presentations. As so much information has been deplatformed, the links might no longer work.  But ‘MyPillow’ CEO Mike Lindell has collected some of the experts who investigated the electoral fraud and has put together a two-hour video that provides some of the massive evidence, certainly enough to liberate you from the media indoctrination ‘there is no evidence.’”

 

Trump and his supporters had every right to challenge the election. This includes the right to demonstrate against the counting of the ballots in Congress. Although the counting is normally a formality, it does not have to be, and members of Congress have the right to challenge the seating of electors.

 

With that in mind, Trump spoke to a rally in Washington. He urged his supporters to demonstrate against the counting and planned to join them, but he was turned away from doing so. He urged the demonstrators to be peaceful, and except for a few agent provocateurs, they were. They did not break into the Capitol but were let in by the police. Indeed, the main violence that day was the murder of a peaceful protestor, Ashli Babbitt. A policeman shot her in the back. As Jacob Hornberger reports, “The Washington, D.C., establishment is, needless to say, up in arms over President-elect Trump’s plans to pardon the protestors who stormed the Capitol on January 6 four years ago. After hundreds of criminal prosecutions and sometimes long jail sentences meted out by federal judges, Trump’s pardons will be upending not only the entire prosecution-and-conviction scheme but also the ludicrous official narrative that has been used to justify the prosecutions and sentences. The narrative states that the protestors were intent on violently overthrowing the federal government and installing Trump into power — overcoming the opposition, of course, of the Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, the Capitol police, the D.C. police, and the FBI.

 

It would be difficult to find a more ludicrous narrative than that. It’s worth mentioning that not one of the protestors had AR-15s or other assault rifles or high-powered handguns. Just think — this would have been the first violent overthrow of a government in history without one ‘insurrectionist’ wielding a gun.

 

Not so, however, with the Capitol police. They were fully armed, as one of the unarmed protestors, a woman named Ashli Babbitt, discovered. As Babbitt was attempting to get through a broken glass window inside the Capitol, Capitol policeman Michael Byrd shot her dead with his gun instead of simply arresting her and taking her into custody.

 

Mind you, Babbitt was not threatening Byrd with any force, much less deadly force. She was just trying to get through the window. The problem is that Byrd got scared, and his fear caused him to shoot and kill an unarmed protestor. Under the law, fear is not a justification for the unauthorized use of deadly force.

 

Not surprisingly, however, the U.S. Department of Justice let Byrd off the hook. They said that he was justified in shooting and killing Babbitt.

 

Well, let’s change the situation around. Let’s assume that Byrd was an unarmed Capitol guard. Let’s also assume that Babbitt trespassed into the Capitol with an AR-15. Let’s say that Babbitt encountered the uninformed Byrd, got scared, and shot and killed him.

 

What would have been the reaction of the Justice Department to that sequence of events? We all know the reaction. It would have been totally opposite to how they treated Byrd’s killing of Babbitt. They would have arrested Babbitt, quickly had her indicted and convicted of murder or some lesser included offense, such as manslaughter or at least negligent homicide. Some federal judge would have thrown the book at her, meting out the highest possible prison sentence.

 

Not so though with Michael Byrd. He gets to go scot-free despite the fact that he employed deadly force against an unarmed woman who was not threatening him with any force whatsoever, much less deadly force.

 

Michael Byrd doesn’t deserve a pardon for his disgraceful killing of an unarmed protestor, and we can only hope that President Biden doesn’t give him one before he leaves office. Byrd deserves a criminal indictment, which Trump’s Justice Department should secure for him. Reprinted with permission from The Future of Freedom Foundation.”

 

Despite this, a large number of protestors were charged with crimes, including insurrection, and given draconian prison sentences.  The protestors were clearly not engaged in an insurrection, which is an attempt to overthrow the government. They were not trying to overthrow the government; they were trying to prevent the election from being subverted.

 

Some radical leftists went so far as to claim that Trump was guilty of insurrection and should be barred from running for president because of a law passed by the Radical Republicans in the 1860s, which was aimed at preventing supporters of the Confederacy from holding federal office.  The Supreme Court of Colorado bought this transparently false argument in a split 4 to 3 decision, and ruled that Trump should be removed from the ballot in Colorado, but the Supreme Court unanimously overruled ruled this.

 

Trump was not guilty of an insurrection. We should do everything we can to oppose the false claim that he was. Trump has promised to pardon the protestors, as he should, and Michael Byrd should be prosecuted. We must defeat the efforts of the radical left to subvert the electoral process.

 

The Best of Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

DONATE to LewRockwell.com

 

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him mail], former editorial assistant to Ludwig von Mises and congressional chief of staff to Ron Paul, is founder and chairman of the Mises Institute, executor for the estate of Murray N. Rothbard, and editor of LewRockwell.com. He is the author of Against the State and Follow him on Facebook and Twitter.

 

ABOUT PAGE