Epstein List Debacle is a HUGE Chink in Trump Armor:

YET I Still Support Trump Because Dem-Marxist Tyranny is Far Worse!

Epstein List Coverup (Photo from The Gateway Pundit)

 

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© July 8, 2025

 

I want to write upfront, I AM STILL A TRUMP SUPPORTER! But this post definitely will not come across as Trump supportive.

 

There are plenty of issues for MAGA adherents to criticize about President Trump decisions and Trump Administration actions. Off the top of my head:

 

o   Operation Warp Speed (from 1^st Term). The mRNA Jab is more and more proving to be disastrous in peer reviewed publications proving its critics to be validated.

 

o   Trump’s embrace of Globalist Big Tech development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in my opinion to compete with CCP-science AI development as a motive, concerns me.

 

o   The Big Beautifull Bill’s increased deficit spending, though to be fair there is much in the BBB that should please MAGA.

 

o   I am Pro-Israel, so I don’t have a problem with selling weaponry to Israel. I do have a problem with using the U.S. Military to engage militarily with Iran increasing the potential of more FOREVER WARS or worse igniting WWIII. (So far that Trump gamble appears to be a win, but could have easily gone crazy wrong.)

 

o   AND NOW, It is apparent the Trump Administration is AGAIN going to epic-fail in holding Elitist Criminals accountable for their crimes. BEST EXAMPLE: The DOJ/FBI closing of the Jeffery Epstein Case.

 

Single Issue Conservatives and Patriots are undoubtedly hardly contain their anger of one or many of these kinds of issues. AND it is tempting to jump onto that Trump-Grumble Train.

 

BUT THERE IS A BIGGER PICTURE! I am very convinced if Trump’s TOO BIG TO RIG reelection in 2024 had not happened, more MAGA-Patriots would have joined J6ers in prison AND Dem-Marxist Reeducation Camps would have been opened to mind-torture dissenters into compliance.

 

There is so much division now among MAGA/MAHA movement supporters, I am concerned the 2026 Mid-Terms will plant the seeds for a revival of a return to Dem-Marxist tyranny in 2028. Elon Musk’s divisive “American Party” is one example of the divide and conquer seeds being planted.

 

The one disappointing thing the Trump DOJ/FBI closing the Epstein Case is demonstrating is that Dem-Marxist and Elitist (as in powerful) WILL NOT be held accountable for crimes committed.

 

The assertion there was no Epstein Client List and that Epstein actually did commit suicide in jail is a tough-to-impossible pill to swallow. Here are some opinions to check out that resonates with me, perhaps with you as well:

 

o   Wait, What? If There Was No Epstein Client List Then Why Did NY Court Refuse The Gateway Pundit’s Legal Request for the List Based on an Anonymous ‘John Doe’ Who Was On the List? By Jim Hoft; The Gateway Pundit; 7/6/25 9:45 pm

 

o   WATCH: Karoline Leavitt grilled over Pam Bondi's broken pledge to release Jeffrey Epstein client list; By Joe Kovacs; WND; 7/7/25

 

o   Eyebrows Raise as Karoline Leavitt Answers Tough Questions About Epstein: Peter Doocy asked directly, “What happened to the Epstein client list that the Attorney General said she had on her desk?” Here’s how Leavitt tried to explain it; By The Vigilant Fox; THE VIGILANT FOX (Substack); 7/7/25

 

o   12 Important Questions That All Americans Should Be Asking About The Shameful Attempt To Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein; By Michael Snyder; Michael Snyder’s Substack; 7/7/25

 

o   ‘A Shockingly Disgusting Betrayal’: MAGA Furious With Trump Post After DOJ, FBI Conclude Epstein Had No Client List; By Jordyn M.; Resist the Mainstream; 7/8/25

 

SO YUP, I am a bit perturbed! This whole debacle of an investigation tells me there are sooo many criminally powerful Elitists politically and with immense influential wealth implicated in the so-called nonexistent list, the Trump Administration believes accountability will do more harm than good to the fabric of politics in the USA.

 

It is my sense that John Leake’s Substack post at FOCAL POINTS – COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE provides a good motive for the Trump DOJ/FBI sweeping Epstein under the rug. THE TITLE: ‘"No Evidence" of Epstein Blackmail Operation Not Surprising: Jeffry Epstein was the construct of intelligence agencies that know how to maintain silence and to cover their tracks’.

 

The cross post is below.

 

JRH 7/8/25

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com

>>HAPPY HEALTHY COFFEE & PERFORMANCE DUO MUSCLE GROWTH & DEFINITION<<

******************************

"No Evidence" of Epstein Blackmail Operation Not Surprising

Jeffry Epstein was the construct of intelligence agencies that know how to maintain silence and to cover their tracks

 

By John Leake

July 8, 2025

FOCAL POINTS – COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE

 

When institutions and powerful individuals operate for long periods without scrutiny, they may be tempted to commit such outrageously corrupt acts that disclosing them to the people becomes an insurmountably difficult task.

 

For years there has been a lot of consternation about the refusal of federal agencies such as the CIA and FBI to disclose what they know about Jeffrey Epstein (as well as about the assassination of JFK, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the murder of Seth Rich, and countless other stories). Guys like me have also noticed how the U.S. government, including Congress, can’t ever quite seem to get to the bottom of the origin of SARS-CoV-2.

 

The truth of these stories carries incalculable liabilities—liabilities that would call into question whether the involved institutions should be allowed to continue existing.

 

Disclosing the truth could also instantly demolish the persistent naïveté that enables most people to maintain their allegiance to their governments and to believe the endless train of BS that we are told every day about everything.

 

I have experience with big liability cases. For a long time I investigated the mysterious deaths of Mary Mahoney on July 6, 1997 in Georgetown and Seth Rich on July 10, 2016 in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of D.C. The circumstances of both deaths strongly raise the suspicion of a political motive, but both were nevertheless chalked up to “botched robberies” by the Metropolitan Police.

 

Someone with power doesn’t want either death elucidated, and I was advised that pursuing my investigations would not only be frustrating and fruitless, but hazardous for my health.

 

The totality of circumstances suggests that Seth Rich was murdered because he knew the DNC emails about to be published by Wikileaks were NOT hacked by Russian agents, but were leaked by a DNC insider. To eliminate the possibility of him bearing witness that there was no Russian hack, the decision was made to eliminate him.

 

Jeffrey Epstein was a much bigger problem, because he was apparently running a blackmail operation using beautiful underage girls who didn’t necessarily look younger than 18. Presented with a beautiful girl who appeared to be 18, most men probably stopped short of asking to see her valid government issued ID before dallying around with her (with hidden videos all over the place). God knows how many immensely powerful men in the United States and Britain were compromised.

 

Epstein was probably running the same kind of trap that Mossad agent Eli Cohen ran against the Syrian political and military elite in the sixties and that bon vivant gangster Udo Proksch ran against the Austrian Socialist Party elite in the seventies.

Eli Cohen (Focal Points Photo)

Udo Proksch with his staff at Cafe Demel (Focal Points Photo)

Jeffrey Epstein (Focal Points Photo)

 

The case of Udo Proksch is illustrative. Using an aristocratic girlfriend as his front woman, he acquired Cafe Demel—one of the most opulent coffee houses in Vienna and the former confectioner to the Imperial Court. He then converted the top floor of the building to house his CLUB 45, whose membership included all of the top ranking members of the Austrian Socialist Party, which held a virtual monopoly on federal power in the 1970s.

 

Proksch invited an old friend of mine to become a member, but my friend suspected that the clubhouse was a one-way mirror trap to which underage girls were invited to “entertain” Austria’s political and financial elite.

Cafe Demel, the former home of Club 45 (Focal Points Photo)

 

In 1977, Proksch committed a massive insurance fraud and mass murder by blowing up a ship called the Lucona—whose cargo he had insured—in the middle of the Indian Ocean. The insurance company smelled a rat and launched an investigation, but was frustrated by the total lack of cooperation from Austrian authorities. It was as though Proksch was untouchable. The only reason he was eventually exposed—twelve years after he committed his crime—was because the West German foreign intelligence service (Bundesnachrichtendienst) and the CIA were unhappy with him for transferring western technology to his friends in the Soviet Union.

 

These intelligence agencies shared their information on Proksch with the independent, Austrian journalist, Hans Pretterebner, who self-published a book on the affair in 1989 titled Der Fall Lucona (The Case of the Lucona).

 

The lesson from the story was clear: unless the intelligence agencies—who control politicians and civil servants—want a big story with major liabilities disclosed, it won’t be disclosed. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] All evidence of the conspiracy will disappear, and people like Pam Bondi, Dan Bongino, and Kash Patel will be left looking like fools.

 

© 2025 Peter McCullough MD MPH

Focal Points HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Focal Points

Judge Lambeth Orders Crooked Hillary Deposition

Judge Royce C. Lamberth rules Crooked Hillary must face an in-person deposition from Judicial Watch over her illegal mail server that corrupt FBI Director James Comey gave her a pass. Hopefully enough dirt is exposed in this deposition that not even Teflon Dem crooks have to face jury trials.

Below is the Fox News and Judicial Watch versions of the Crooked Hillary deposition news.

JRH 3/3/20

Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

***************************

Federal judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition to address private emails: 'Still more to learn'

By Ronn Blitzer

March 2, 2020

Fox News

A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business.

Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about this and should not have to do so again -- the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation -- but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.

"As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business," Lamberth said.

The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, "those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Lamberth said that using written questions this time “will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.”

Lamberth even gave some examples of lingering questions about Clinton's emails, such as how did she come to believe that her private emails would be preserved under normal State Department processes, who told her this and when, at what point did she learn department records management officials did not know about the server, "[a]nd why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?"

The ruling comes after Judicial Watch revealed at a December 2019 status conference that the FBI released "approximately thirty previously undisclosed Clinton emails," and that the State Department "failed to fully explain" where they came from.

The State Department has been pushing for the discovery phase of the case to come to a close, but Lamberth said he is not ready to do so, saying that "there is still more to learn."

Judicial Watch, which initiated this case in 2014, is looking for information regarding whether Clinton used her private email server to intentionally get around the Freedom of Information Act, whether the State Department acted in bad faith when they tried to settle the case years ago, and whether the department had adequately looked for records in response to Judicial Watch's initial FOIA request.

Given that the settlement attempts and records search took place after Clinton left office, the judge ruled that the deposition should focus on whether she intentionally tried to use her private server to evade FOIA and her understanding of the State Department's record management requirements.

Lamberth also granted Judicial Watch's request to depose former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Paul Combetta who was involved in deleting Clinton's emails, as well as Brett Gittleson and Yvette Jacks, who were State Department officials familiar with Clinton's private email server.

Judicial Watch also wanted to question Clinton and Mills about government talking points in the aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attack. Lamberth said that while they "cannot be questioned about the underlying actions taken after the Benghazi attack," they can face questions regarding "their knowledge of the existence of any emails, documents, or text messages related to the Benghazi attack."

Fox News' Bill Mears contributed to this report. 

++++++++++++++++++++++

Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

Crooked Hillary JW Photo

Press Releases

March 02, 2020

Judicial Watch

Court: ‘It is Time to Hear Directly from Secretary Clinton’

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch today announced that U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills and two other State Department officials.

Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

The ruling comes in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that seeks records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the “talking points” that provided the basis for Susan Rice’s false statements were created by the Obama White House. This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

In December 2018, Judge Lamberth first ordered discovery into whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court also authorized discovery into whether the Benghazi controversy motivated the cover-up of Clinton’s email. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” The State and Justice Departments continued to defend Clinton’s and the agency’s email conduct.

Judge Lamberth today overruled Clinton’s and the State and Justice Department’s objections to limited additional discovery by first noting:

Discovery up until this point has brought to light a noteworthy amount of relevant information, but Judicial Watch requests an additional round of discovery, and understandably so. With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers.

Additionally, Judge Lamberth said that he is troubled by the fact that both the State Department and Department of Justice want to close discovery in this case:

[T]here is still more to learn. Even though many important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department inexplicably still takes the position that the Court should close discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The Court is especially troubled by this. To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous, especially when considering State’s deficient representations regarding the existence of additional Clinton emails. Instead, the Court will authorize a new round of discovery

With respect to Clinton, the court found that her prior testimony, mostly through written sworn answers, was not sufficient:

The Court has considered the numerous times in which Secretary Clinton said she could not recall or remember certain details in her prior interrogatory answers. In a deposition, it is more likely that plaintiff’s counsel could use documents and other testimony to attempt to refresh her recollection. And so, to avoid the unsatisfying and inefficient outcome of multiple rounds of fruitless interrogatories and move this almost six-year-old case closer to its conclusion, Judicial Watch will be permitted to clarify and further explore Secretary Clinton’s answers in person and immediately after she gives them. The Court agrees with Judicial Watch – it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton.

“Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal and we’re pleased that the court authorized us to depose Mrs. Clinton directly on her email conduct and how it impacted the people’s ‘right to know’ under FOIA,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

++++++++++++++++++

BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

__________________________

Federal judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition to address private emails: 'Still more to learn'

©2020 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.

______________

Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

© 2020 Judicial Watch, Inc.

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

NEW Docs Show State Dept KNEW about Hillary Clinton's Secret Email Account

JW Senior Attorney Ramona Cotca discusses Crooked Hillary Email & State Dept.

I got the Judicial Watch update about the State Department’s coverup of knowledge of Crooked Hillary’s secret but illegal secret email server on October 17. But the video was posted October 9. The info about crooked Dems is important enough to share even if it’s been around awhile. If it’s news to you, be sure to share on your Social Media connections.

JRH 10/18/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support SlantRight 2.0 

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

**************************

VIDEO: NEW Docs Show State Dept KNEW about Hillary Clinton's Secret Email Account

Posted by Judicial Watch

282K subscribers - Premiered Oct 9, 2019

READ MORE HERE: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-court-forces-release-of-clinton-wikileaks-discussion-email-that-confirms-state-department-knew-about-her-email-account/

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-judge-criticizes-state-and-justice-departments-on-clinton-email-cover-up/

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-victory-court-grants-significant-new-discovery-in-clinton-email-case/

On this episode of Inside Judicial Watch, Amelia Kohen interviews Judicial Watch Senior Attorney Ramona Cotca to discuss the latest update on the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

=========================

KEEP UP WITH JUDICIAL WATCH

Donate today! ► https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/thank-youtube/    

… MORE TO READ