John R. Houk
© September 11, 2013
Today is the anniversary of two tragedies that affect Americans. On September 11, 2001 Islamic terrorists attacked the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and another Muslim hijacked jet was a given a target but the brave passengers tried to overcome the Muslim hijackers and so those Islamic terrorists crashed the jet into a rural field in Pennsylvania.
Both President Bush and President Obama have gone the extra mile telling Americans that the USA is not at war with Islam (Especially Obama). My fellow Americans that is a delusion. It is a delusion because the followers of Islam that believe the Quran is the very word of their deity called Allah and the example of Islam’s prophet Mohammed as laid down in the Hadith and Sunna follow those writings violent tenets.
Apologists for Islam proclaim that Radical Islam represents at most TEN Percent of Muslims. AND YET only a minuscule amount of Muslims deride the actions of Islamic terrorists are dare to accuse that the Radical Muslims’ interpretation of the Quran, Hadith and Sunna is wrong. WHY? Because in effect criticism of the Quran (especially), Hadith and Sunna would be calling those perceived holy books to be a lie. Such an accusation in Islam is considered blasphemy and worthy of death.
According to a Pew Research Center article published on June 7, 2013 there are about 1.6 BILLION Muslims on the earth:
There are an estimated 1.6 billion Muslims around the world, making Islam the world’s second-largest religious tradition after Christianity, according to the December 2012 Global Religious Landscape report from the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. (World’s Muslim population more widespread than you might think; By Drew DeSilver; Pew Research Center – Fact Tank; 6/7/13)
So that would probably be over billion Muslims not willing to denounce the Quran, Hadith and Sunna as archaic. There are then a billion complacent Muslims that may not support Radical Islamic violence but are not willing to denounce what is holy to Islam that that gives a foundation to Radical Islamic theopolitical ideology.
So over a billion Muslims look the other way. How many Muslims make up that activist 10%? Let’s do the math. The answer is 160 MILLION activist Jihadists willing to kill non-Muslims and Muslims not conforming to purist Islam. Friends that is 160 million Muslim that consider themselves at war with the USA and another billion plus Muslims taking a wait-and-see what happens attitude in this Islamic war against America and Israel. Yes Leftist-Americans, Muslims hate Jews for reestablishing their heritage in their hatred as a reason to raise the ire of Radical Islam. America represents Christianity and Western principles of Civil Rights. Radical Islam hates both as much as the theopolitical religion hates Jews.
And that brings us to the declaration of war by Islam on our homeland.
To bring this home the evil of Islam below is a video that focuses on Americans that had to choose how to die – burning to death or jumping to their death.
Did you see those victims of an Islamic Terrorist attack jumping?! Below is the reaction of Muslims residing on what Jordan labeled the West Bank but what Israel calls Judea-Samaria:
Then there Osama bin Laden himself justifying the Islamic attack on U.S. soil because of Western oppression executed in Muslim lands. Incidentally, that is a load of Islamic propaganda. The main reason for continued poverty in Muslim nations today is because Muslim dictators-leaders investing in maintaining their rule militarily on the backs of Muslim people. Israel is an example of a sliver of a prosperous oasis when education and ingenuity is the premium more than a medieval death culture built on the hatred of everything non-Islamic. Here is Osama with English subtitles:
In the beginning of this I post I wrote there are two anniversaries today. ONE year ago on this day al Qaeda inspired Islamic Terrorists attacked an American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya. As the report first broke I seem to remember the news stories saying a Benghazi Embassy or Consulate were attacked. This part of the entire enigma surrounding the data of this attack. Why was no helped dispatched? What was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi? Was Stevens the U.S. government platform to use some of dead Qaddafi’s weapons to be sent clandestinely to Syrian Rebels? If such a deal was being worked out, who was involved in a weapons transfer to Syrian Rebels? Let’s speculate that the USA, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Libyan victorious factions and Syrian Rebels. Perhaps even Egypt while under the Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi?
VIDEO: Day Of Remembrance 9/11 Marked with Somber Tributes 12 Years & 1 Year for Benghazi (Beginning at 3 minute mark)
I have not heard any major news outlet reveal this. There is a Benghazigate because Obama hides nefarious secrets. In the blogosphere it is reported often that Ambassador Chris Stevens was in Benghazi working out a plan that did not leave any U.S. (ergo Obama) footsteps leading to the arming of Radical Muslim Syrian Rebels. Here is an excerpt from Klein Online:
Reuters reported the U.N. experts who penned this week’s report said transfers of arms to Syrian rebels had been organized from various locations in Libya, including Misurata and Benghazi, via Turkey or northern Lebanon.
“The significant size of some shipments and the logistics involved suggest that representatives of the Libyan local authorities might have at least been aware of the transfers, if not actually directly involved,” the experts said.
Confirming KleinOnline’s exclusive reporting for over a year, the New York Times last month reported that since early 2012, the CIA has been aiding Arab governments and Turkey in obtaining and shipping weapons to the Syrian rebels.
While the Times report claims most of the weapons shipments facilitated by the CIA began after the latest presidential election, Middle Eastern security officials speaking to KleinOnline have said U.S.-aided weapons shipments go back more than a year, escalating before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi.
In fact, the Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND since last year describe the U.S. mission in Benghazi and nearby CIA annex attacked last September as an intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels in the Middle East, particularly those fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
The aid, the sources stated, included weapons shipments and was being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Days after the Benghazi attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, KleinOnline broke the story that Stevens himself played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian and other Middle Eastern security officials.
Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security officials.
The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria, said the officials.
Last month’s New York Times article has bolstered KleinOnline’s reporting, citing air traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel commanders describing how the CIA has been working with Arab governments and Turkey to sharply increase arms shipments to Syrian rebels in recent months.
The Times reported that the weapons airlifts began on a small scale in early 2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanding into a steady and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows.
The Times further revealed that from offices at “secret locations,” American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons, including a large procurement from Croatia. They have vetted rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.
The CIA declined to comment to the Times on the shipments or its role in them.
The Times quoted a former American official as saying that David H. Petraeus, the CIA director until November, had been instrumental in … READ ENTIRETY (U.N. report covers up Obama role in arming terrorists. Bombshell revelations show how secret administration policy is fueling conflicts; By Aaron Klein; Klein Online; 4/12/13 3:29 AM EST)
If you do some cogitating about Benghazigate you might begin to understand the reasoning Peace-At-Any-Cost Obama wants to attack Bashar al-Assad’s rogue regime in Syria. If Assad pulls the hat trick with Russian and Chinese help and wins the Syrian civil war just think of the Anti-American propaganda that will flow. “What propaganda are you implying my dear blogger,” you might ask?
Assad will real the truth that President Barack Hussein Obama began to arm the Radical Muslim Syrian Rebels even before his reelection in November 2012. AND if you think about it. Defeated, deposed and executed dictator Muammar Gaddafi had an arsenal of Chemical Weapons. Perhaps Obama through his clandestine arms dealer Chris Stevens sent some of those Chemical Weapons to the Free Syrian Army.
Things get murkier with new evidence that come to light and is extremely well documented on Shoebat.com:
A Libyan intelligence document has been produced that directly implicates Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Mursi in the attacks on American installations in Benghazi on 9/11/12. Those who attempt to discredit this document run into trouble when it is coupled with real-time video we uncovered on 9/13/12. In that video, gunmen at the scene of the attack can be heard declaring that they were sent by Mursi.
…
Based on the Obama administration’s standard, the Benghazi attacks should be treated as a crime instead of as an act of war. Therefore, let us bring forth the evidence, which implicates the leader of a nation state (Egypt) in the attack and warrants a grand jury (House of Representatives) investigation to decide if administration officials should be indicted (impeached).
Since we’re deciding who to indict, we must look at evidence of involvement in the attack. Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood President – Mohammed Mursi – is a good place to start. Our first two exhibits are both damning but when taken together, may just constitute a ‘smoking gun’. EXHIBIT A is a video shot from a cell phone at the scene of the attacks. In this video, gunmen are seen running toward the camera, toward other gunmen. At one point – in Arabic which we have confirmed – one approaching gunman says, “Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi!”. Even though the video is in Arabic, you can discern the word “Mursi”.
VIDEO: Mohammad Haraz / calamity during the attack on the Embassy of Benghazi .. Dr. Morsi (Title Translated by Google Translate)
A Libyan Intelligence document (EXHIBIT B) has now been brought forward by credible Arabic translator Raymond Ibrahim. This document discusses the confessions of six members of an Egyptian Ansar al-Sharia cell who were arrested and found to be involved in the Benghazi attacks. Ibrahim reported the following about this document:
It discusses the preliminary findings of the investigation, specifically concerning an “Egyptian cell” which was involved in the consulate attack. “Based on confessions derived from some of those arrested at the scene” six people, “all of them Egyptians” from the jihad group Ansar al-Sharia (“Supporters of Islamic Law), were arrested.
According to the report, during interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members “confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi… (YOU Really Have to READ, VIEW & Listen to ALL the Evidence in Article - Ironclad: Egypt Involved in Benghazi Attacks; By Walid Shoebat, Ben Barrack and Keith Davies; Shoebat.com; 6/30/2013)
WOW! You talk about a Conspiracy. The documentation moves the data from Theory to FACT.
I have ran out of exploring gas. So I am finishing here with wonderment. I get all the unconstitutional weapons transfer out of Libya to aid Radical Muslims in Syria. What I don’t get – yet – is why al Qaeda linked terrorists called Ansar al-Sharia attacked a U.S. diplomatic mission that was (working out a clandestine plan to cover Obama’s tracks) preparing arms to their fellow Islamic terrorists in Syria? I realize about the story about a kidnapping gone wrong with Ambassador Chris Stevens to force the USA to release Muslim prisoners incarcerated in American prisons (or even Gitmo), BUT why would they bite the hand that feeds them until at least the Islamic goal of victory was accomplished?
Well there you go – more work to be uncovered or read about from industrious bloggers. You know the Mainstream Media won’t uncover details unless the truth stings them in the eye.
JRH 9/11/13
No comments:
Post a Comment