What happened at Fort Hood yesterday is a demonstration of the influence of Mohammed’s Islam on an individual. Regardless of what the Politically Correct Mainstream Media (MSM), the typical Leftist or the majority of so-called non-violent Muslims will you; Mohammed’s religion was created on the back of theo-political conquest as well as harshly securing the conquest by humiliating or killing the conquered.
The peace found in Islam is by those who submit to the theo-political dogma of Islam as inspired by Mohammed (its author), the Quran (the so-called words of Allah as delivered by Mo), the Hadith, Sunnah and various other Islamic commentary writings.
The so-called peace is submerged by the violence called for when Islam is offended either from within (Muslims) or outside (kafir).
As more and more info becomes available about Muslim U.S. Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Hasan, we will become aware that Islam played a huge part in his decision to go on a bloodthirsty psycho-spree.
A blog on the New York Times has been keeping track with updates at Fort Hood and Nidal Hasan. I am going repost the updates in reverse order up to the time of this writing. I have know idea when the updates will discontinue however I am certain a few more will arrive at the blog so go there to get caught up or possibly a location not quite as politically correct as the New York Times.
A lot of Conservative Political Action Committees (PAC) not affiliated with a political candidate love to take credit for their part in a candidate’s victory. When a candidate loses either try to spin their part as a success or are silent.
I start out this way because a Conservative candidate that was attempting to buck the Two-Party System in America gave a good shot but lost in New York district 23. That candidate was Conservative Party nominee for the House of Representatives Doug Hoffman.
I learned the reason for Hoffman’s loss. It was not because Hoffman polled third behind Democrats and Republicans. He actually polled second at 45% to %49%. Leftist Democrat Bill Owens won by a mere 4%. The travesty for Hoffman’s loss is the Republican candidate battling Hoffman and Owens realizing she was not going to win dropped out of the race and endorsed the Leftist Democrat Owens. That RINO Republican was Dede Scozzafava.
One may ask, “Why is a Republican supporting a Democrat for Office in this time of growing voter mistrust of Democrats and Leftists?”
Scozzafava was truly a Republican in Name Only. She supported the Democratic Party Leftist platform which included Pelosi favoritism for abortion and social transformation rendering the U.S. Constitution irrelevant. This is the very same thing President Barack Hussein Obama represents as well.
Hoffman has a remarkable amount of reputable Republicans endorse him over the Leftist Scozzafava. This I found a blessing for the Conservative base that is reemerging as the voice of Americans. I was a bit disheartened to hear that Republicans such as Newt Gingrich supported Scozzafava for no other reason than Republican Party loyalty. Newt should have realized that blind Party loyalty will not make significant wins as former Presidential candidate Senator John McCain proved. Senator McCain was a RINO that really had only a couple of attractions for a Conservative Republican; viz. his rough reputation as a maverick and his Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin. McCain banked on his maverick image of making his own decisions regardless of Conservatism or Leftism. McCain should have been wise enough to utilize Palin better bark at Obama’s Leftist credentials and past associations. This is especially so since the Obama campaign utilized the MSM to castigate Palin’s image with down right made up Leftist lies.
Thus goes Party loyalty! Down the proverbial drain!
If the Republican Party used the opportunity to get a Hoffman win with GOP financial resources, Hoffman would have definitely won that race. Sure Hoffman is NOT a Republican but does anyone believe he would caucus with Leftist Democrats? This was a non-Republican Conservative who would not support the Pelosi way as Scozzafava would have. You have to know that Owens is merely a rubber stamp for the Obama/Pelosi Leftist agenda for America.
I am on the Club for Growth mailing list. Club for Growth as any good PAC group would have gave a spin self-gratifying personal spin on Hoffman’s loss. Regardless of Chris Chocola of Club for Growth’s personal spin, the point made of why Doug Hoffman should have won is very relevant for future Conservative and Republican politics of the near future.
Here is the email Chocola sent to me:
JRH 11/6/09 ************************ Hoffman Comes Up Short in NY-23
Chris Chocola Sent: November 4, 2009 12:03:50 PM Club For Growth
As you have probably heard by now, Club for Growth PAC-endorsed candidate Doug Hoffman lost his underdog bid in yesterday's special election in New York's 23rd congressional district. Nominee of the Conservative Party of New York, and the first third-party candidate the Club PAC has ever supported, Doug finished with 45 percent of the vote, but fell short to Democrat Bill Owens' 49 percent. The official Republican nominee, Dede Scozzafava, took 5.5 percent of the vote and played the spoiler after dropping out of the race and endorsing the liberal Democrat in the final days of the campaign.
Doug's loss is a disappointment, but our efforts shined a national spotlight on the campaign and sent an important message to Washington insiders. The day the Club for Growth PAC entered the race, Doug was polling at 17 percent - with our help, he gained 28 points in just 36 days, and came very close to pulling off an historic upset against both major parties. It's now clear that had the Republican Party supported Doug or any serious conservative from the beginning, he would have won going away.
Party labels aside, conservatives lost nothing last night, as Scozzafava and Owens are both avowed liberals in support of Nancy Pelosi's agenda in the House of Representatives. Doug Hoffman was our only chance to bring real change to Washington, and in little more than a month, we almost helped him pull it off.
As attention turns now to the 2010 election cycle, there are a few lessons to be learned from last night's results. First, the Club's PAC reaffirmed its unique ability to identify and promote economic-freedom candidates early on and to draw conservatives around the country to their cause. Second, the Republican establishment learned that in these difficult times, voters - especially center-right voters - are drawn to principles, not parties. And most importantly, conservatives learned that the principles of limited government and economic freedom are ascendant heading into next year's elections, and that the Club for Growth PAC stands ready to fight effectively for those principles wherever we can do the most good.
Thank you for all you did in the historic NY-23 race. I say "historic" not because we won this battle - we didn't - but because I have a good feeling that this battle will set a tone for and pay dividends in the coming battles against national health care, for limited government, and to mobilize grassroots free-market citizens to rise up in other election contests in 2010.
Chris Chocola President, Club for Growth 2001 L Street, NW, Ste 600 Washington, DC 20036 PH: 202-955-5500
Government mandated disclaimers -- Donations to the Club for Growth are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. We do not accept donations from corporations, labor unions, foreign nationals, or federal contractors. Donations may be used for political purposes such as supporting or opposing candidates. No funds will be earmarked or reserved for any political purpose.
Yesterday I read a Liberty Council authored Christian Newswire article that validated Conservatism, Christian Family Values as well as Biblical moral values. The article basically was a ‘smack the red headed step-children’ of Leftism and the homosexual agenda in its hubris over President Barack Hussein Obama and the Leftist Dems “Change” mantra of the 2008 election.
In summary here is the summary of the Conservative/Family Value victory:
Virginia voted in a Conservative Republican Governor, Lt. Governor and Attorney General while contrastingly showing the Virginia Dems the door.
Incumbent Leftist Dem Governor John Corzine was defeated by Republican Chris Christie even though the Leftist darling President BHO campaigned for him and the MSM polls showed Corzine leading in the polls.
In May 2009 the lawmakers of Maine produced a bill signed by the Governor legalizing same-sex marriage. On November 4, 2009 Maine voters chose Biblical Morality over lawmaker Secular Humanism by repealing the legislation. Leftists and homosexual ideologues made sure via the comment route to inform a State legalized same-sex marriage by law rather than judicial fiat.
To my joy I discovered slanted right political wit Ann Coulter wrote an article demonstrating the Conservative cause is alive and well. My fellow Conservatives read it for some mirth. Counter-culture Leftists and homosexuals read it and weep.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is a litigious deceptive Islamic-American organization with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and terrorists such as Hamas.
The one thing CAIR hates is when non-Muslims expose this reality concerning CAIR. This is where the word “litigious” enters the picture. CAIR has taken a page from the Leftist ACLU to use large economic resources to intimidate people who criticize their organization. This concept is known as lawfare, legal jihad or libel terrorism. The intimidation’s goal is to force a retraction or economically ruin the defendant.
In the case of CAIR two people come to my mind. They are Andrew Whitehead and Joe Kaufman* (*although Kaufman was sued by CAIR likeminded Muslim-American organizations.) of Anti-CAIR and CAIR Watch (Americans Against Hate) respectively. Whitehead and Kaufman successfully beat down lawfare intimidation.
Now it appears to be the turn of Dave Gaubatz and son Chris Gaubatz who were instrumental in the research documentation of the new book Muslim Mafia. CAIR is going after the Gaubatzes with some legal jihad claiming the two are in breach of contract, theft of documentation and trespassing.
World Net Daily (WND) is promoting the Muslim Mafia has sent an update concerning this legal intimidation tactic.
JRH 11/4/09 *********************** CAIR Sues Investigators Behind 'Muslim Mafia' But doesn't refute reporting that ties it to terror...
World Net Daily Sent: 11/3/2009 10:21 AM
(WASHINGTON) Nov. 3, 2009 – A nonprofit Islamic organization with a notoriously litigious history—once even encouraging suing U.S. citizens who reported suspicious activity on an airplane—is suing the investigators whose popular book is exposing its ties to terror.
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) filed a federal lawsuit against P. David Gaubatz, who co-authored "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America," with investigative journalist Paul Sperry. CAIR is charging Gaubatz and his son, Chris, with conspiring to carry out a six-month uncover operation in which they secretly recorded meetings and "stole" thousands of pages of sensitive documents from the Washington, D.C.-based Muslim group.
Published by WND Books, "Muslim Maifa" (sic) presents first-hand evidence that CAIR is acting as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood – the parent of al-Qaida and Hamas – to infiltrate the American system and help usher in the rule of Saudi-style Islamic law over the United States.
In the lawsuit, CAIR seeks punitive damages from the Gaubatzes for trespassing, breach of contract, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty. But it does not defend itself against the book's claims.
"At issue is the 12,000 pages of incriminating internal documents Chris Gaubatz collected during the 6-month internship," writes David Kupelian, WorldNetDaily vice president and managing editor, in an open letter to readers. "CAIR says he stole them. But as WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah has previously explained in a letter to Congress, the CAIR material was legally obtained by Chris Gaubatz, who had been asked by CAIR officials 'to shred documents he believed might be criminal evidence ... and involve matters of national security.'"
"On advice from counsel, he collected those documents and preserved them. None of the documents were 'stolen,'" Farah said. "They were, in fact, handed to him by CAIR employees for destruction. All of the documents are available for review by appropriate law-enforcement authorities and, in fact, some have already been provided to them."
Based on scathing findings from a six-month undercover investigation—where Chris, posing as a recent Muslim convert, salvaged 12,000 sensitive CAIR documents from the shredder—"Muslim Mafia" is stunning in its timeliness, breaking news that:
• The FBI severed ties with CAIR for its role in the largest terror-finance case in U.S. history;
• CAIR's legal strategy in the recently settled "flying imams" case advised lawsuits not just against the airline that expelled the imams for odd and threatening behavior, but also against the concerned citizens who reported the behavior;
• CAIR's support for an imprisoned cop killer who directs a violent Islamic sect in Detroit—whose local leader was recently involved in a deadly shootout with federal agents.
Scrutiny is emanating from Congress and the public after "Muslim Mafia" brought these and other startling revelations to light.
To book Sperry, contact Tim Bueler (530) 401-3285 media@wnd.com. For more details, visit http://www.muslimmafia.com/.
"Muslim Mafia," featuring a foreword written by U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick, co-founder of the Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus, is packed with pages of recently declassified government documents and evidence, including thousands of e-mails, faxes and internal memos that were never meant for public viewing.
Some of the key smoking-gun revelations detailed in the book include:
• How CAIR debated launching a smear campaign against Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California after she cited concerns over its associations.
• Means CAIR employs to excuse, protect and prevent police from prosecuting Muslim men who beat their wives, decreeing such beatings are OK for American Muslims so long no mark remains.
The courageous work of the investigators and infiltrators makes "Muslim Mafia" a gripping read, and reveals that these radical Islamofascists are working in the U.S. to:
• Gut U.S. anti-terrorism laws;
• Loosen U.S. Muslim immigration policies;
• Infiltrate the government and institutionalize Shariah law;
• Hinder FBI investigations of terrorist suspects;
• Tip off terrorist suspects prior to raids.
"The evidence found in the investigation is incontrovertible, after all, it's their own documents laid bare," said co-author and investigative journalist Paul Sperry. "With more than 12,000 pages of support documentation, more than 40 pages of footnotes and an appendix containing more than 50 pages of exclusive confidential documents, "Muslim Mafia" offers hard proof of the Muslim Brotherhood's subversive strategy against America."
Iran was supposed to have given a final decision to a document it approved in principle stipulating Iran would ship most of its nuclear fuel to Russia for enrichment rather than do the process in Iran. Iran made the deal October 21, 2009 with the deadline being October 22. Theoretically this was to alleviate Western fears of developing nuclear warheads for Iran’s already tested ICBM’s. I expressed the thoughts that neither Iran nor Russia could be trusted in such a deal.
October 22 has come and gone with Iran claiming IAEA ElBaradei made no such deadline. Rather ElBaradei merely suggested a response time.
Of course this a typical stall tactic employed quite successfully by Iran whenever the psycho-ruling Shi’ite Clerics felt international pressure needed a bit of smoke and mirrors.
As of November 2 it is obvious Iran is backing away from the plan agreed on in principle on October 21. Officially Iran has is still claiming adherence to the plan with only a few minor details being changed. The reality is the minor details is a full about face counter-proposal. This indicates that Iran still has every intention of constructing nuclear weapons. If this is the case as I believe then John Bolton’s advice for a pre-emptive strike by Israel is well founded.
Probably for political purposes the Obama Administration via Secretary State Clinton has publicly taken the stand there will be no other deal for Iran. There indications that the Obama Administration are drawing up plans for stiff sanctions to be imposed on Iran. This leaves one to wonder: What are the stiffer sanctions Obama intends to use? If they are as toothless as in the past then why even bother to have sanctions. Simply do what Obama’s Administration has been hoping anyway; i.e. give Iran a rubber stamp of inevitability as a regional nuke power and mold foreign policy accordingly.
Will Israel become a Lone Ranger and strike Iran when it understands completely where Obama foreign policy is leading concerning Iranian nuclear weapons?
There is an Iran nuclear analysis provided by AP writer Brian Murphy concerning Iranian President Ahmadinejad toward the West, America and Israel. The part of the analysis that struck me is that Ahmadinejad is willing to go the extra distance in his arrogant disdain of American power as a deterrent. So I ask again, “What will Israel do?”
Islamic honor killings in America are on the rise yet the obsessively politically correct MSM refuses to expose this as a problem in America. Usually it is male Muslims (Fathers, brothers or male relatives) that perpetuate the heinous deaths of honor killing.
I just read of a crime in America in which the Muslim wife of a Pakistani couple murdered her husband (Sheikh Naseem) because he was becoming more American than Muslim. He begged his wife to dress more American which meant to her – more revealing clothes. GASP!
“Honey I got to kill you for insulting Islam.” (Imaginary quote)
The mainstream media (MSM) and the Obama Administration are so absolutely Slanted Left (so MSM and definitely the President are more Left than slanted). Because of this fact I became a little irritated that President Barack Hussein Obama has been vilifying FOX News as a tool of the Republican’s Right Wing. The President has even tried to box FOX out of White House press meetings because of this public stand against FOX.
Now it is also evident that the Obama’s cadre MSM is becoming a tool of Obama’s Leftism by using the power of the press to also vilify FOX News as so far to the Right that they are not a legitimate unbiased journalistic media outlet.
Ironically FOX News often receives criticism from the more Slanted Right for not being Right enough. I personally am a huge supporter of FOX yet I also am unpleased sometimes with a position or lack of reporting on an issue. Even so I will not vilify the only media outlet that counters the obvious Leftism of the MSM.
Ron Radosh has written an excellent piece of the vile hypocrisy of Leftist MSM. Take a gander at it!
