Depopulation Gates was involved in pre-COVID conspiracy to censor vaccine-alerters especially via Social Media. Consider this Blacklisted News title and link.
JRH 3/16/21 (H/T SeaShell)
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:
Or if donating you can support by getting in the Coffee from home
business making yourself extra cash – OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee,
that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive –
Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
***********************************
BEFORE COVID, GATES PLANNED SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP OF
VACCINE SAFETY ADVOCATES WITH PHARMA, CDC, MEDIA, CHINA AND CIA
March 14, 2021
Originally The
Defender – Children’s Health Defense News & Views (3/11/21)
In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Gates
and other powerful individuals began planning how to censor vaccine safety
advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a worldwide
pandemic, known as Event 201.
Over the last two weeks, Facebook and
other social media sites have deplatformed
me and many other critics of regulatory corruption and
authoritarian public health policies. So, here is some fodder for those of you
who have the eerie sense that the government/industry pandemic response feels
like it was planned — even before there was a pandemic.
The attached
document shows that a cabal of powerful individuals did indeed
begin planning the mass eviction of vaccine
skeptics from social media in October 2019, a week or two
before COVID began
circulating. That month, Microsoft founder Bill
Gates organized an exercise of four “table-top” simulations of
a worldwide coronavirus pandemic with other high-ranking “Deep State”
panjandrums. The exercise was referred to as Event
201.
Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the
World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University
Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various
media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence
Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former
CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson
& Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman,
the world’s leading corporate PR firm.
At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of
a Pandemic Control Council, wargaming government strategies for controlling the
pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little
talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic
drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new
patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines.
But the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric,
fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global
coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.
Oddly, Gates now claims that the simulation didn’t occur. On
April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC,
“Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the
health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted
territory.”
Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos
of the event are still available across the internet. They
show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s
hard to swallow that Gates has forgotten.
Gates’s Event 201 simulated COVID epidemic caused 65 million
deaths at the 18-month endpoint and global economic collapse lasting up to a
decade. Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis
is a bit of a dud, having imposed a mere 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” over
the past 13 months.
The deaths “attributed to COVID” in the real-life situation
are highly questionable, and must be seen in the context of a global population
of 7.8 billion, with about 59 million deaths expected annually. The predictions
of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate — but only
because of the draconian lockdown promoted by Gates.
Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots
triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among
its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of
convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and
censorship state.
Segment four of the script — on manipulation
and control of public opinion — is most revealing. It uncannily predicted
democracy’s current crisis:
o
The participants discussed mechanisms for
controlling “disinformation” and “misinformation,” by “flooding” the media with
propaganda (“good information”), imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods
and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement.
o
Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the
authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the
participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift through
information on these social media platforms” to protect the public from
dangerous thoughts and information.
o
George Gao, the prescient director of the Chinese
Center for Disease Control, worries about how to suppress “rumors” that the
virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is a manmade’… [and that]
some pharmaceutical company made the virus.”
o
Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar
and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial recognition
technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures.
He blames riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicts that Twitter and
Facebook will cooperate in “identify[ing] and delete[ing] a disturbing number
of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak” and to
implement “internet shutdowns … to quell panic.”
o
Dr. Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at
Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, worries
that pharmaceutical
companies are being accused of introducing the virus so they
can make money on drugs and vaccines: “[We] have seen public faith in their
products plummet.” She notes with alarm that “Unrest, due to false rumors and
divisive messaging, is rising and is exacerbating spread of the disease as
levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is
a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds her fellow collaborators that “We know that
social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so
interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.”
There are many ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to
accomplish this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national
access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content
and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the
spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading
harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”
o
Matthew Harrington, CEO of Edelman Public
Relations agrees that social media must fall in line to promote government
policy: “I also think we’re at a moment where the social media platforms have
to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they’re a technology
platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant
in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and
health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate
information. Because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of
misinformation and disinformation is not possible.”
o
Stephen Redd, the Admiral of the Public Health
Service, has the sinister notion that government should mine social media data
to identify people with negative beliefs: “I think with the social media
platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible …
to misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that
communication mechanism.”
o
Adrian Thomas of Johnson & Johnson announces
“some important news to share from some of “our member companies [Pharma]”: We
are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals, and in fact, in vaccines!” He
recommends a strategy to address the problems to these companies when “rumors
were actually spreading” that their shoddily tested products “are causing
deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe we’re
making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and
infections.”
o
Former CIA deputy director, Avril Haines
unveiled a strategy to “flood the zone” with propaganda from “trusted sources,”
including “influential community leaders, as well as health workers.” He warns
about “false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address
the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.”
o
Matthew Harrington (Edelman CEO) observes that
the Internet — which once promised the decentralization and democratization of
information — now needs to be centralized: “I think just to build a little bit
on what Avril said, I think as in previous conversations where we’ve talked
about centralization around management of information or public health needs,
there needs to be a centralized response around the communications approach that
then is cascaded to informed advocates, represented in the NGO communities, the
medical professionals, et cetera.”
o
Tom Inglesby (John Hopkins biosecurity expert
advisor to the National Institutes of Health, the Pentagon and Homeland
Security) agrees that centralized control is needed: “You mean centralized
international?”
o
Matthew Harrington (Edelman) replies that
information access should be: “Centralized on an international basis, because I
think there needs to be a central repository of data facts and key messages.”
o
Hasti Taghi (Media Advisor) sums up: “The
anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically
through social media that has spread. So as we do the research to come up with
the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the
right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to
ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
o
Kevin McAleese, communications officer for
Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear
countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation.
We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these
disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense.
This is a huge problem that’s going to keep us from ending the pandemic and
might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If
the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s
the right choice.”
o
Tom Inglesby, director of Bloomberg’s Johns
Hopkins Center for Health Security concurs, asking if “In this case, do you
think governments are at the point where they need to require social media
companies to operate in a certain way?”
o
Lavan Thiru, Singapore’s Finance Minister
suggests that the government might make examples of dissidents with “government
or enforcement actions against fake news. Some of us, this new regulations are
come in place about how we deal with fake news. Maybe this is a time for us to
showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and
leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some
fake news.”
Read the attached transcript to see how Gates and his
government, pharma and intelligence apparatus telegraphed their plans to censor
and control the media during the pandemic. In yet another uncanny coincidence,
COVID-19 began circulating among global populations within days of Gates’ meeting.
____________________________________
© 2016 - 2021 Children's Health
Defense® • All rights Reserved
