Here’s another Sunday cross post some piece you may find
interesting or fascinating. Again YOU may have read, BUT I’m guessing many have
not read.
The theme of Solomon’s piece is the FISA warrant standards presented
to the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to look at Carter Page and George Papadopoulos did NOT include
the exculpatory evidence a FISC Judge probably would have denied a warrant.
If President Trump declassifies
evidence in the Russia investigation, Carter Page’s summer bike ride to a
Virginia farm and George Papadopoulos’s hasty academic jaunt to London may
emerge as linchpin proof of FBI surveillance abuses during the 2016 election.
The two trips have received scant attention. But growing
evidence suggests both Trump campaign advisers made exculpatory statements — at
the very start of the FBI’s investigation — that undercut the Trump-Russia
collusion theory peddled to agents by Democratic sources.
The FBI plowed ahead anyway with an unprecedented intrusion
into a presidential campaign, while keeping evidence of the two men’s innocence
from the courts.
Page and Papadopoulos, who barely knew each other, met
separately in August and September 2016 with Stefan Halper,
the American-born Cambridge University professor who, the FBI told Congress,
worked as an undercover informer in the Russia case.
Papadopoulos was the young aide that the FBI used to justify
opening a probe into the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016, after he
allegedly told a foreign diplomat that
he knew Russia possessed incriminating emails about Hillary Clinton.
Page, a volunteer campaign adviser, was the American the FBI
then targeted on Oct. 21, 2016, for secret surveillance while investigating
Democratic Party-funded allegations that he secretly might have coordinated
Russia’s election efforts with the Trump campaign during a trip to Moscow.
To appreciate the significance of the two men’s interactions
with Halper, one must understand the rules governing the FBI when it seeks
a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
warrant such as the one secured against Page.
First, the FBI must present evidence to FISA judges that it
has verified and that comes from intelligence sources deemed reliable. Second,
it must disclose any information that calls into question the credibility of
its sources. Finally, it must disclose any evidence suggesting the innocence of
its investigative targets.
Thanks to prior releases of information,
we know the FBI fell short on the first two counts. Multiple FBI officials have
testified that the Christopher Steele dossier had not been verified when
its allegations were submitted as primary evidence supporting the FISA warrant
against Page.
Likewise, we know the FBI failed to tell the courts that
Steele admitted to a federal official that he was desperate to defeat
Trump in the 2016 election and was being paid by Clinton’s campaign and
the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to gather dirt on the
GOP candidate. Both pieces of information are the sort of credibility-defining
details that should be disclosed about a source.
What remains uncertain in the court of public opinion is
whether the FBI possessed evidence suggesting Papadopoulos and Page — and,
thus, the larger Trump campaign — were innocent of collusion. Republican
lawmakers have suggested for months that such evidence existed and was hidden
from the courts, but none has emerged in public.
My reporting from more than two dozen sources, many with
access to the FBI’s evidence, suggests one answer to that question lies in
Halper’s interactions with the two Trump campaign advisers, some of it
documented in FBI records. And interviews with both men reveal just how much
they told Halper about their innocence.
Page, an avid biker, rode his mountain bike on Aug. 20,
2016, to a Northern Virginia farm after being invited there by Halper for a
casual Saturday visit. Page met Halper weeks earlier when invited by Halper’s
assistant to a Cambridge academic
conference. The two corresponded by email around the time of Page’s
trip to Moscow and arranged to meet in Virginia.
By the time Page arrived at Halper’s farm, he had been
rattled by media calls during the prior week in which reporters alleged having
information that Page met with two senior Russian intelligence figures in
Moscow. The reporters suggested his trip might have been part of a larger plot
to coordinate with Russia to benefit Trump’s election as president.
That allegation, it turns out, was one of many in the
uncorroborated Steele dossier guiding the FBI’s collusion probe.
Page told me he was incredulous at the suggestions and told
everyone he knew, including Halper, that he had not met either Russian intel figure
and knew of no Trump-Moscow coordination.
“I’m certain that nothing I said that day at the professor’s
farm could be deemed as anything other than exculpatory. And once again, in
September, I explained reality to the FBI. Contrary to the DNC’s false reports,
I have never met those Russians, and I did not know of any effort to
coordinate, collude or conspire with Russia. Period.”
Page said he went to Moscow in July 2016 simply to give a speech,
at the same university where former President Obama spoke a few years earlier.
And he said he consciously did not take any actions with Russians that might
raise concerns, especially after helping U.S. prosecutors and the FBI in
an earlier Russian criminal
case and meeting with federal authorities as recently as the
previous March.
“I’ve never done anything even vaguely resembling illegality
throughout the countless trips to Russia. But I was exceptionally meticulous
that trip to carefully avoid anything that could be remotely construed as
questionable,” he told me.
Page’s recollection is backed up by a letter he sent to
then-FBI Director James Comey a few weeks
after his Halper meeting. “For the record, I have not met this year with any
sanctioned official in Russia, despite the fact that there are no restrictions
on U.S. persons speaking with such individuals,” he wrote in September 2016.
Multiple sources tell me none of the FISA applications the
FBI submitted to judges over the course of a year’s surveillance of Page made
any mention of exculpatory statements or protestations of innocence that Page
made to informants.
If such statements exist, in the form of a tape or a
transcript or an FBI interview report — three routine investigative tools the
FBI uses when managing informers — then it would be a huge omission that likely
violated FBI rules.
A month later, in London, Papadopoulos was paid $3,000 to
present a foreign policy paper to Halper. On the second day of his visit with Halper,
Papadopoulos said the conversation turned from academic work to a barrage of
questions about Russia, Trump and collusion, including whether the Trump
campaign had conspired with Russia on the hacked Clinton emails or changed the
GOP platform on Ukraine to appease Vladimir Putin.
Papadopoulos told me he pointedly remembers his response: “I
made it clear to Halper that what he was suggesting did not only amount to
treason, but that I had absolutely no idea what he was talking about and had no
information at all about anyone involved with the campaign who might have been
involved with a conspiracy because there never was a conspiracy and no one was
colluding with a foreign power, especially Russia.
“Furthermore, I made it clear to him that Ukraine should be
supported and that Russia will always remain a competitor, even if Trump
decided to work with Russia to stabilize Syria and East Ukraine while checking
China’s rise.”
Sources familiar with the FISA applications say they contain
no evidence that Papadopoulos made exculpatory statements unwittingly to an FBI
informer.
Again, if such statements exist in transcripts, tapes or FBI
reports, they’re a major omission.
Page never has been charged with
wrongdoing. And Papadopoulos, after an exhaustive investigation by special
counsel Robert Mueller, was not accused
of conspiracy with Russia; instead, he pleaded guilty to making a false
statement to the FBI about a months-old conversation with Australian diplomat
Alexander Downer regarding a rumor that Russia possessed embarrassing emails
from Clinton.
The crime was deemed so minor by the presiding judge that
Papadopoulos was sentenced to a mere 14 days in
jail.
If Page’s and Papadopoulos’s recollections of what they told
Halper are accurate, former FBI officials Comey, James Baker, Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok — all of whom
played a role in the Russia probe and the FISA warrants — have some serious
explaining to do. So does departing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who signed the fourth and final FISA
warrant.
My reporting suggests a much bigger scandal — the
intentional misleading of the nation’s federal intelligence court — soon may
eclipse the Russia narrative that has dominated the media the past two years.
The fastest way to know if that storm is on the horizon is
for Trump to declassify the documents showing
exactly how the FBI behaved in this case.
___________________
John Solomon is an
award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed
U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal
scientists’ misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and
numerous cases of political corruption. He serves as an investigative columnist
and executive vice president for video at The Hill.
THE
HILL
1625 K STREET, NW SUITE 900 WASHINGTON DC 20006 | 202-628-8500 TEL |
202-628-8503 FAX
I had a friend request on the MeWe social media (my MeWe profile)
where I discovered a repost of a popular chain email. I haven’t figured out how
to link to individual MeWe post as yet or I’d share it. I found it on Vonda’s MeWe
page if you choose to look for it.
If you look around the Web this chain email is all over the
place under various names, versions and snippets. I am calling the chain email All
Dots Connected based on the first three words on this version.
As a Conservative, the chain email is so familiar much of the information
you can find here or read from Conservative sources. The thing is
though, chain emails are notoriously unreliable for reasons leaning from
down-right untrue to partially true, right on through to manipulative
propaganda of twisted facts and lies.
Indeed, most of the fact checkers (dominated by Leftist
ideology) labels this chain email as false. I used to be a devotee of Snopes
and Politifact as dependable fact checkers. Then I began to notice the
false stamp on facts I knew directly was true or at least mostly true. Here are
some posts exposing the Leftist taint of Snopes
and Politifact.
If you do a little of your own investigating you will probably discover a
Leftist taint of most fact checking websites.
The fact checking website I currently trust the most is Truth or Fiction.
Realizing the bias of fact checkers I decided to do my own
look at the chain email All Dots Connected. What I discovered was the
post is mostly true. There are some assertions based on one source alone; viz.,
Roger Stone. Just to be upfront. Stone is berated by the Left as a Right-Wing
Conspiracist nut-job. The political Right pundits even question his reliability
on many if not most Stone’s line of thinking. You’ll have to decide for
yourself on Stone’s credibility.
Roger Stone was a one-time campaign advisor for Donald
Trump. This placed a target on Stone’s back from the Mueller witch hunt. BUT
SURPRISE, just like President Trump, the Mueller hound dogs have found ZERO on Stone
as a go-between involving Donald Trump and Russia meddling in the 2016 election:
Mr. Mueller, a former FBI director,
was appointed in May 2017 to investigate Russia’s
alleged involvement, including any potential collusion between the Trump
campaign and Moscow.
Mr. Stone,
65, successfully predicted the release of Democratic documents by WikiLeaks
during the race and previously claimed to be in contact with the website’s
publisher, Julian Assange.
“I never received anything
including allegedly hacked emails from WikiLeaks or Julian Assange or the
Russians or anyone else,” Mr. Stone told
ABC News. “[I] never passed them on to Donald Trump or the Trump campaign or
anyone else.”
Individuals
close to Mr. Stone who
said they were contacted by Mr. Mueller’s office include Jason Sullivan, his
former social media consultant; Andrew Miller, a longtime associate; Randy
Credico, a radio host and comedian who personally met with Mr. Assange at his
residence in London during the race; and fellow former Trump campaign advisers
Sam Nunberg and Michael Caputo. John Kakanis, Mr. Stone’s
driver and accountant, was subpoenaed to appear before the special counsel,
Reuters previously reported.
“CNN reports Mueller probing my
personal finances. Reuters reports Mueller subpoenas my current and former
associates and now clear my e-mail, text and phone all monitored. My crime?
Supporting @realdonaldtrump for President!” Mr. Stone said
in a social media post this week.
Currently Mueller is trying to strongarm Stone with
investigations that have
nothing to do with Russia interfering in the 2016 election. That
witch hunt continues on getting anything on President Trump that had nothing to
do with Mueller’s mandate to investigate if Trump and Russia worked together to
fix the 2016 election cycle.
The last part of the chain email All Dots Connected tries to
link Rod Rosenstein’s wife Lisa Barsoomian as a potential instrument of the CIA
the to take down President Trump. To me, any such link is a huge stretch of the
imagination of fantastical speculation. I have little doubt Barsoomian would
work with other Deep Staters, but currently there is no connection other than
her association with hubby Rosenstein, Comey, Mueller and the Clintons on some
kind government basis.
AND NOW, All Dots Connected with linked sources,
source quotes and personal commentary.
ALL DOTS CONNECTED...Clinton’s, Mueller, Rosenstein,
Comey, Learner, plus secret guests ... Let’s PLAY FOLLOW THE TRAIL...
Let’s follow the trail......
Here's what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn
together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this.
Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important......
From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into
the Clinton Foundation.
A Grand Jury had been empaneled.
Governments from around the world had donated to the
“Charity”.
Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the
Clinton Foundation were declared. [The closest corroboration to this
assertion is a Daily
Mail lengthy article that shows the IRS refused to audit Clinton
Foundation during this time period amidst inexplicable fraud schemes in alleged
foreign charity work.]
Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would
be able to figure this out.
Guess who took over this investigation in 2002? [Truth
or Fiction; 4/25/18]
Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own
personal email server by the way.
The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of Hillary.
[Axios– 10/24/17 AND TheHill- 11/02/17 06:00 AM EDT]
Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for
America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the
sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.
Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal,
except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.
However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill
Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one-hour speech then meets with
Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.
Ok, no big deal right?
Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money
laundering and bribery scheme. [FBI
informant gathered years of evidenceon Russian push for US nuclear fuel deals,
including UraniumOne, memos show;
By JOHN SOLOMON; TheHill; 11/20/17
06:11 PM EST]
Guess who was the FBI Director during this time frame?
How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States
of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole
providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?
Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?
‘The Kazakhstan deal was
extremely lucrative for Giustra. He and others, such as Ian Telfer, who according
to TheNew York Times served as Uranium One’s
chairman, donated substantial amounts to the Clinton Foundation. Inan interview with Tucker Carlson of Fox News, Schweizer says,
“As this deal was coming for approval in 2010, the Clinton Foundation received
[donations] from nine shareholders in this uranium company that was sold to the
Russians. None of them all of a sudden decided they were going to donate large
amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation, more than $145 million. And by the
way, a lot of those donations were never declared publicly by the Clintons,
they were hidden.”’]
Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working
the Charitable Division?
No other than, Lois Lerner.
Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing
to see here, right?
Let’s fast forward to 2015.
Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9
“investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was
running the 10th
investigation as Chairman of the Select
Committee on Benghazi discovers that Hillary ran the State
Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.
He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned
over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was
required by law. [Hillary
Clinton didn't comply with email policies, State Dept IG finds; By CBS/AP;
CBSNews.com; 3/25/16 10:56 AM – Updated 1:07 PM EDT:
‘"At a minimum, Secretary
Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business
before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not
comply with the Department's policies that were implemented in accordance with
the Federal Records Act," the report reads.
It goes on to say that Clinton
produced 55,000 pages of emails to "mitigate" her failure to preserve
the emails, but the inspector general "notes that Secretary Clinton's
production [of 55,000 pages of emails] was incomplete." The report also
says that the 55,000 pages included no emails from the first few months of her tenure
as secretary for either received or sent messages.’]
He also discovered that there was Top Secret information
contained within her personally archived email. [But
her emails? You’redang right her emails; By Marc A. Thiessen; Chicago Tribune; 6/20/18
4:55 PM:
“In fact, the overlooked
bombshell of the report is the inspector general’s confirmation that classified
information contained in Clinton’s emails was in fact compromised by foreign
intelligence services, and that Clinton had recklessly emailed President Barack Obama using her unsecured personal
email from the territory of a hostile foreign adversary.”]
(Let's not
forget at least 10 CIA spies in China were killed by the Chinese because of the
leaks and god knows what else occurred) [Blog Editor: I could not find a
direct link to CIA deaths in China and Crooked Hillary’s illegal private email
server. BUT a connect the dots look shows Crooked Hillary’s private may have
contributed to Chinese murders of CIA Agents. Here are some dots to consider:
“110 e-mails in 52 e-mail
chains have been determined by the owning [federal agency] to contain
classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those
chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36
chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential
information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those,
about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential;
the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were
sent.” (Critical
Cybersecurity Takeaways From Hillary’sEmail Debacle; By Stark
On IR; CyberSecurityDocket.com;
7/15/16 12:19 pm)
A Dot:
The Chinese government
systematically dismantled C.I.A. spying operations in the country starting in
2010, killing or imprisoning more than a dozen sources over two years and
crippling intelligence gathering there for years afterward.
… Some were convinced that a
mole within the C.I.A. had betrayed the United States. Others believed that the
Chinese had hacked the covert system the C.I.A. used to communicate with its
foreign sources. Years later, that debate remains unresolved.
Clinton and her top aides had
access to a Pentagon-run classified network that goes up to the Secret level,
as well as a separate system used for Top Secret communications.
The two systems — the Secret
Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence
Communications System (JWICS) — are not connected to the unclassified system,
known as the Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet). You
cannot email from one system to the other, though you can use NIPRNet to send emails
outside the government.
Somehow, highly classified
information from SIPRNet, as well as even the super-secure JWICS, jumped from
those closed systems to the open system and turned up in at least 1,340 of
Clinton’s home emails — including several the CIA earlier this month flagged as
containing ultra-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access
Programs, a subset of SCI.
…
As a result of Clinton’s
negligence, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in a recent interview he
thinks “the odds are pretty high” that hostile foreign powers like Iran, China
and Russia hacked Clinton’s homebrew email server and stole US secrets. (Hillary’s
team copied intel off top-secret server to email; By Paul Sperry; NY Post;
1/24/16 5:09am)
A Dot:
Former top FBI lawyer Lisa Page
testified during two days of closed-door House hearings, revealing shocking new
Intel against her old bosses at the Bureau, according the well-placed FBI
sources.
…
The embattled Page tossed James
Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Bill Priestap among others under the
Congressional bus, alleging the upper echelon of the FBI concealed intelligence
confirming Chinese state-backed ‘assets’ had illegally acquired former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 30,000+ “missing” emails, federal sources
said.
The Russians didn’t do it. The
Chinese did, according to well-placed FBI sources.
And while Democratic lawmakers
and the mainstream media prop up Russia as America’s boogeyman, it was the
ironically Chinese who acquired Hillary’s treasure trove of classified and top
secret intelligence from her home-brewed private server.
…
Hundreds of top secret documents
and even the president’s daily travel and security itineraries were on that
server — and intercepted by a communist country — yet the FBI sat on the
evidence. Likewise, all of Clinton’s and her inner circle’s outgoing emails
were compromised as well, sources confirmed.
That is enough Dots for me to connect CIA deaths in China
to Crooked Hillary’s illegal private email server.]
Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums
they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that
were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave
it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.
Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?
Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer
(Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million
dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? [Blog Editor:
But Comey earned $6 million in
one year alone from Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin became a Clinton
Foundation donor that very year.
Comey served as deputy attorney
general under John Ashcroft for two years of the Bush administration. When he
left the Bush administration, he went directly to Lockheed Martin and became
vice president, acting as a general counsel.
How much money did James Comey
make from Lockheed Martin in his last year with the company, which he left in
2010? More than $6 million in compensation.
Lockheed Martin is a Clinton Foundation donor. The company
admitted to becoming a Clinton Global Initiative member in 2010.
Most of the Left-Wing fact checkers dispute the direct
connection between Comey, Lockheed Martin and Crooked Hillary. The Leftists
twist the dots with a “FALSE” disregarding the linkage between dot to claim no
direct connection means it didn’t happen. The most neural fact checker – Truth
or Fiction – says the facts are correct but those facts do not provide a
provable direct link, hence labels the linkage as misleading – HERE
and HERE.]
No other than James Comey.
Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at
State, huh?
Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email
Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at
the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her. [Blog Editor: This should
sound familiar:
“The U.S. Department of Justice
and the FBI began an investigation into the IRS controversy in May 2013.[30] In
October 2015, the DOJ announced it was closing the investigation and would not
seek criminal charges.[1] The
determination came after an investigation of almost two years, in which the DOJ
and FBI interviewed more than 100 witnesses and reviewed more than a million
pages of IRS documents.[1]
In a letter to House Judiciary
Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia, announcing the
case closure, Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Peter J.
Kadzik wrote that while "our investigation uncovered substantial evidence
of mismanagement, poor judgment, and institutional inertia...Not a single IRS
employee reported any allegation, concern or suspicion that the handling of
tax-exempt applications—or any other IRS function—was motivated by political
bias, discriminatory intent, or corruption."[1] Kadzik
wrote "We found no evidence that any IRS official acted based on
political, discriminatory, corrupt, or other inappropriate motives that would
support a criminal prosecution."[31] Kadzik
stated that the investigation specifically absolved Lerner of criminal
liability, and determined that Lerner was in fact the first official to
recognize a problem and try and correct it.[1][32] (FBI
finds no evidence to support criminal prosecution; Wikipedia;
page was last edited on 6/18/18, at 03:09 (UTC)”)]
Nope.... couldn’t find any crimes there.
Can you guess what happened next?
In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of
Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like
candy. [Blog Editor:
“Former FBI Director James Comey
started to draft a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in the bureau's
investigation into her use of a private email server before the FBI interviewed
her or her key witnesses, the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday.
"Conclusion first,
fact-gathering second — that's no way to run an investigation. The FBI should
be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great
public interest and controversy," Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck
Grassley, R-Iowa, and Judiciary Subcommittee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.,
said in a letter to the FBI.
Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a
miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out
into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016 and
exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing. [Blog Editor:
It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General,
Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government
information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham
by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and
DOJ and the story continues.
FISA Abuse, political espionage..... pick a crime, any
crime, chances are...... this group and a few others did it.
All the same players.
All compromised and conflicted.
All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.
All connected in one way or another to the Clintons.
They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt
everything they touch.
How many lives have these two destroyed?
As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years
of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of
mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.
See the person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still
doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies?
Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.
Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s
background. [Blog Editor: Much of the information below is based on Roger
Stone posts. Incidentally, Stone’s website is under a red
McAfee alert warning:
“Site Report
Here’s why stonecoldtruth.com/muller-rosenstein-and-comey-the-three-amigos-from-the-deep-state/ is
dangerous
We regularly scan sites for
suspicious and malicious activity — and this one just isn’t safe. You’ll find
more details below.
One should consider if the McAfee alert is Left-Wing
based or is actually infected with malicious content harmful to one’s computer.
Nevertheless, many Conservative websites reference the Stone post and those
websites are not under a McAfee alert.]
Lisa H. Barsoomian, a US Attorney that graduated from
Georgetown Law, is a protege of James Comey and Robert Mueller. [Blog
Editor:
“Enter Lisa Barsoomian, wife of
Rod Rosenstein. Lisa is a high-powered attorney in Washington, DC, who
specializes in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the
Intelligence Communities. She works for R. Craig Lawrence, an attorney who has
represented Robert Mueller three times, James Comey five times, Barack Obama
forty-five times, Kathleen Sebelius fifty-six times, Bill Clinton forty times,
and Hillary Clinton seventeen times between 1991 and 2017.
Barsoomian participated in some
of this work personally and has herself represented the FBI at least five
separate times. It would be great to research the specifics of the
cases she worked in, but many of the documents from the Court Dockets relating
to these cases have been removed from the D.C. District and Appeals Court,
including records of her representation for Clinton in 1998’s case Hamburg. V.
Clinton.
The “Three Amigos” have
surprisingly obvious conflicts of interest in their past and current
investigatory responsibilities. Mueller even acted as a delivery boy for
Hillary’s State Department, hand transporting ten grams of highly enriched
uranium under the auspices of counter-terror. Was it a coincidence that this
happened at the same time as Hillary and her associate John Podesta were
nurturing the Uranium One deal that would see Russia take control over 20% of
America’s proven uranium reserves? Shortly after the Russia uranium deal
closed, the Clinton Foundation was showered with many millions of dollars from
Russian donors.” (The “Truth”
Part III: The Three Amigos; By Dan Newman; Truth News Network; 8/9/18)
And more:
“But the biggest reason why
Rosenstein should recuse himself is that his wife was mentored by both Comey
and Mueller and has been involved in many cases representing the FBI and
Democrats involved in this case.
Roger
Stone reported the following on Lisa Barsoomian in 2017:
Enter Lisa Barsoomian, wife of
Rod Rosenstein. Lisa is a high-powered attorney in Washington, DC, who
specializes in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the
Deep State, err, I mean, the Intelligence Communities.
Lisa Barsoomian works for R.
Craig Lawrence, an attorney who has represented Robert Mueller three times, James
Comey five times, Barack Obama forty-five times, Kathleen Sebelius fifty-six
times, Bill Clinton forty times, and Hillary Clinton seventeen times between
1991 and 2017.
Barsoomian participated in some
of this work personally and has herself represented the FBI at least five
separate times. It would be great to research the specifics of the cases
she worked in, many of the documents from the Court Docket relating to these
cases have been removed from the D.C. District and Appeals Court, including her
representation for Clinton in 1998’s case Hamburg. V. Clinton.
Senator Lindsey Graham sent a
letter on Thursday to Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein about whether
Rosenstein should recuse himself from the Mueller investigation due to his
obvious conflicts with the case.
Graham should also request
information about Rosenstein’s wife who represented the Clintons in the past.
…
Graham, in the May 31-dated
letter, cited reports that Mueller’s investigation is looking at whether
President Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey – and the fact that Trump
relied on a Rosenstein-authored memo to justify the firing. Rosenstein’s
role was further detailed in a New York Times report earlier this week on a
memo written by ousted FBI official Andrew McCabe.
Fox News has confirmed that
the memo described a meeting where Rosenstein claimed Trump had asked him to
reference Russia in his recommendation to fire Comey. Rosenstein declined, and
instead focused on Comey’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe. Trump
pushed back on the account Thursday. “Not that it matters but I never
fired James Comey because of Russia! The Corrupt Mainstream media loves to keep
pushing that narrative, but they know it is not true!” Trump tweeted.
…
Rosenstein’s
wife, Lisa Barsoomian, represented Bill Clinton in a case in the
1990’s. This alone should be enough for Rosenstein to be unqualified for
any role related to the Clintons, Obama or their cronies.
…
Roger
Stone reported the following on Lisa Barsoomian in 2017 –
Enter Lisa Barsoomian, wife
of Rod Rosenstein. Lisa is a high-powered attorney in Washington, DC, who
specializes in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the
Deep State, err, I mean, the Intelligence Communities.
Lisa Barsoomian works for R.
Craig Lawrence, an attorney who has represented Robert Mueller three times,
James Comey five times, Barack Obama forty-five times, Kathleen Sebelius
fifty-six times, Bill Clinton forty times, and Hillary Clinton seventeen times
between 1991 and 2017.
Barsoomian participated in
some of this work personally and has herself represented the FBI at least five
separate times. It would be great to research the specifics of the cases
she worked in, many of the documents from the Court Docket relating to these
cases have been removed from the D.C. District and Appeals Court, including her
representation for Clinton in 1998’s case Hamburg. V. Clinton.
Her loyalties are clearly
with the entities that make up the Deep State, as are her husbands.
Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the
FBI at least five times.
You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares
about the
work history of this Barsoomian woman?
Apparently someone does, because someone out there cares so
much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton
representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the
DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?). [Blog Editor: Honestly, the only
reference to a Barsoomian document purge of any sort are the many versions (and
there are many) of this chain email. Ergo, either the statement is accurate
OR no such purge ever took place.]
Someone out there cares so much that the internet has been
“purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian. [Blog Editor: This statement
is blatantly false or I would not be able what I have discovered my own to this
point.]
Historically, this indicates that the individual is a
protected CIA operative. [Blog Editor: Unsubstantiated speculation
undoubtedly based on the CIA’s reputation] Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian
has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of
the intelligence community. [Blog Editor: I found this relating to
Barsoomian and FOIA:
‘In 2000, she represented the
FBI in a case that involved “a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by
the Electronic Privacy Information Center,” according to Wired.An ABC News story stated: “Government lawyer Lisa
Barsoomian contended the group’s request for a court order was moot because the
FBI had agreed to expedite its review.”
From what I could discover on the fly about Lisa
Barsoomian and FOIA is she overwhelming represented the FBI. The only specific
FOIA/CIA/Barsoomian action I found are primarily quotes of this chain email
without naming the specific reference requested.]
And, although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of
cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa
Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health.
This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an
operative by using another government organization to shield their activities. Blog
Editor: Again, unsubstantiated speculation.]
It’s a cover, so big deal right? I mean what does one more
attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?
It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel
and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of
California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the
Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and
subsequent 14-month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization
mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into
collusion between the Trump team and the Russians.
Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention?
BECAUSE….
She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE….That’s
why!!
GET THIS INFORMATION OUT TO EVERYONE YOU CAN.
Jaw dropping, shocking and extremely sad that this info has
never been exposed-
DO YOUR PART IN PLASTERING THIS INFORMATION EVERYWHERE
.... it’s bullet proof and cannot be blown off by leftists ... and will
convince many not paying attention that we have a soft coup happening now..
GLP powers activate .... get this all over the net and email
Boxes. [Blog Editor: Being a Baby-Boomer, I have no idea what “GLP” means. I’m
guessing it has to do with getting the info out far and wide.]
