DONATE

Showing posts with label Political Asylum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Political Asylum. Show all posts

Friday, January 11, 2019

Surprising New Allies for Asia Bibi?



Asia Bibi spent about nine years on a Pakistani prison death row convicted under Islamic Supremacist Blasphemy laws. Only because some Muslim accusers couldn’t get their story straight, the Pakistan Supreme Court set aside her conviction. Her accused crime: Refreshing her thirst at a Muslim well (which irritated Muslims anyway) in which an argument with Muslim co-workers over who was better person – Jesus or Muhammad (Undoubtedly giving the Islamic Supremacists the excuse to cause harm to the Christian Asia Bibi – aka Aasiya Noreen).

Asia Bibi is out of prison yet STILL stashed away by the Pakistan government hoping a nation will step up against Islamic Supremacism and grant her and her family asylum. A CFI article has a story that some prestigious Pakistan Muslim scholars are condemning the violence aimed at Asia Bibi. I’m still not reading an asylum promise.

JRH 1/11/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:
********************
Surprising New Allies for Asia Bibi?

January 11, 2019


Pakistan Muslim Clerics Denounce Violence

Over 500 Muslim scholars gathered in Pakistan to condemn terrorism and extremism. They signed a declaration rejecting violence and murder committed “under the pretext of religious belief” and criticized the use of fatwas (edicts) by radical clerics.

They also called Asia Bibi’s case an absolute “priority”. The Christian mother was acquitted of blasphemy after 9 years in jail but lives in hiding from violent mobs organized by extremist Islamist leaders. Pakistan’s Supreme Court called the case a “feast of falsehoods” and her accusers were guilty of insulting her Christian beliefs.

Christians in Pakistan and other Muslim-majority countries live in constant fear of rising radicalism. “Refugees tell us that the spread of Islamist ideology turns life-long neighbors into terrorists,” said Wendy Wright with Christian Freedom International.

The Pakistan Ulema Council signed the declaration in Islamabad on January 6, 2018. Muslim scholars formed the group to be a voice for peace, stability and religious harmony in the county. They declared 2019 a “Year to annihilate terrorism, extremism and sectarian violence from Pakistan” and stated, “non-Muslim citizens must enjoy the same rights as everyone else.”

“We tried to issue a similar declaration in 2002,” the chairman of Pakistan Ulema Council told ucanews.com, “but the government ignored such efforts. People were afraid to speak about harmony between sects and other faiths.”

The declaration states all citizens, regardless of religion “have the constitutional right to live in the country following their cultural and religious principles”. The government must “ensure the protection of the life and property of non-Muslims living in Pakistan.”  Murder in the name of religion “is contrary to the teachings of Islam”.

The clerics affirmed the right for religious groups to meet and organize and asks authorities to ban “any material (books, pamphlets, audio) that incites religious hatred” and to punish anyone that threatens “the sacred places of non-Muslims”.

The resolution also criticizes fatwas against public servants.

The Pakistan Ulema Council plans to keep a check on non-Islamic decrees beginning in late March. Over 5,000 religious scholars and clerics will meet in Islamabad in March for “The 4th International Message of Islam Conference”.

Radical Islamists killed two government officials who defended Asia Bibi, and threatened to murder Pakistan justices who acquitted Asia Bibi.

“Too many leaders – religious and government – fear criticizing radical Islamists. This declaration is a step toward countering Islamists’ murderous hatred and promoting respect and rights for Christians,” said Wendy Wright.

This article was compiled from reports from Asia News, Zenit and UCANews
___________________
© 2018 Christian Freedom International. All Rights Reserved.
To God be the Glory


Our Mission

The mission of Christian Freedom International is to help Christians who are persecuted and suffering for their faith in Jesus Christ. We are a non-denominational human rights organization providing real solutions to conditions of oppression and misery caused by religious persecution. We reach the part of the persecuted Church that is the most repressed, most at risk, and most isolated. In areas of disaster, we provide immediate relief to Christians, and their communities, who are ignored by conventional aid organizations.

It is our privilege to minister to the Persecuted through Bible distribution, medical aid, resettlement assistance, advocacy, asylum case-work, and aid to the disabled; to sponsor schools, vocational training, and self-help initiatives; to provide these services at no charge by CFI staff and volunteers. It is our goal to work together with Christians at home to ease the burdens of our struggling brethren around the world.

Our History

Since 1998, Christian Freedom International has been on the forefront in the battle for the rights of persecuted Christians around the world. CFI has come to the aid of thousands of suffering men, women, and children through the distribution of food, water, medicine, clothing, Bibles, and other basic supplies in countries where persecution is most intense. CFI has built field hospitals, schools in refugee camps, Bible Schools, and Centers to aid disabled Christians. But CFI’s work is not limited to the distribution of relief aid. Over the years, CFI has consistently remained active as a “voice for the voiceless” in Washington, DC, providing political advocacy and practical grassroots action on behalf of the millions of Christians who routinely suffer for their faith.



CFI Logo

The CFI logo is of a lone CFI Backpack medic delivering aid to Christians in the war-zones of Burma. In 1998, CFI pioneered the backpack medic program and the lifesaving work has continued ever since.



Monday, June 24, 2013

No Doubts – Snowden is a Traitor

Ed Snowden Map of present & possible fleeing
John R. Houk
© June 24, 2013

I wrote a blog post on June 10th entitled “I Consider Snowden a Hero-Whistleblower – For Now”. The “For Now” part has elapsed. During his stay in Hong Kong Edward Snowden provided some of those secret NSA documents over to the South China Morning Post (SCMP). The SCMP is a Hong Kong newspaper. Hong Kong is a former British Colony forced to be returned to Communist China when the lease agreement was up. Hong Kong operates autonomously BUT is still under the Red Chinese government. Hello Mr. Snowden! Communist China is not exactly on friendly terms with the USA. In fact our American government has been complaining about Chinese hackers committing cyber war against the USA. So what does Snowden do?

Snowden tells Chinese press the USA has been hacking China for years. Essentially Snowden placed his Country in an awkward position publicly. Personally I doubt Red China is so gullible and stupid not to know that we would allow a challenger to our National Interests and National Security to have an anti-American agenda go unchecked. So when Snowden reveals to the international public that which China already knows, then Snowden is providing our unspoken enemy China a diplomatic international coup against the USA. That moves Snowden from Hero-Whistleblower thinking of his fellow Americans privacy to Treasonous-Dog revealing classified info to foreign nations.

The media has managed to follow Snowden from Hong Kong to Moscow (link last updated at this post as 1:41 PM ET). Most of the media believed Snowden was going to board a Russian passenger Aeroflot jet bound for Venezuela then Ecuador. Nobody knows what has happened except Snowden did not board the Aeroflot jet. Personally I believe Mother Russia is talking to Edward Snowden to get some NSA Intel just as China has managed to do:

Experts said it was likely that the Russians were questioning Snowden, interested in what he knew about U.S. electronic espionage against Moscow.

"If Russian special services hadn't shown interest in Snowden, they would have been utterly unprofessional," Igor Korotchenko, a former colonel in Russia's top military command turned security analyst, said on state Rossiya 24 television. (Excerpted from: Snowden not on flight to Cuba, whereabouts unclear; by MAX SEDDON; Associated Press; 6/24/13 1:22 PM EDT)

DEFINETLY Edward Snowden has evolved from a NSA Hero-Whistleblower exposing that our government has been spying on all Americans to a cowardly traitor that has become a double agent style spy for China and Russia. As an American traitor á la Benedict Arnold and Bradley Manning, Snowden needs to be captured and prosecuted. If a guilty verdict is given his punishment should be according to the damage he has accomplish giving classified information to China and Russia. I don’t know what that information is but if it was critical as in Julius and Ethel Rosenberg giving nuke secrets to the old USSR so that the USA would not have a monopoly on Atomic Weapons. The act was treasonous and the Rosenbergs were convicted of a Capital Crime on April 5, 2013 and were fried in the electric chair on 1953.

Below are two articles exposing Edward Snowden’s wretchedness:

Report: Snowden took job to gather NSA cyber evidence

Edward Snowden Blows It Part 1 & 2

JRH 6/24/13
*********************************
Report: Snowden took job to gather NSA cyber evidence

By Zach Coleman, Kevin Johnson and Doug Stanglin
1:19 p.m. EDT June 24, 2013

Snowden revealed an NSA program that collected telephone records for millions of Americans.

HONG KONG -- NSA leaker Edward Snowden says he took his job with the National Security Agency for the sole purpose of obtaining evidence on Washington's cyberspying networks, the South China Morning Post reported Monday.

Snowden, who was in Hong Kong before fleeing to Moscow this weekend, told the newspaper that he sought a position as an analyst with the consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton so he could collect proof about the NSA's secret surveillance program ahead of planned leaks to the media.

"My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to lists of machines all over the world the NSA hacked," he told the Post in a June 12 interview that was published Monday. "That is why I accepted that position about three months ago."

In his interview with the Post, Snowden divulged information that he claimed showed hacking by the NSA into computers in Hong Kong and mainland China.

"I did not release them earlier because I don't want to simply dump huge amounts of documents without regard to their content," he said. "I have to screen everything before releasing it to journalists."

Asked by the Post if he specifically went to Booz Allen Hamilton as a computer systems administrator to gather evidence of surveillance, he replied: "Correct on Booz."

His intention was to collect information about the NSA hacking into "the whole world" and "not specifically Hong Kong and China," he said.

The documents he divulged to the Post were obtained during his tenure at Booz Allen Hamilton in April, he said.

He also signaled his intention to leak more of those documents at a later date.

"If I have time to go through this information, I would like to make it available to journalists in each country to make their own assessment, independent of my bias, as to whether or not the knowledge of U.S. network operations against their people should be published," he said.

Snowden's current whereabouts are a mystery after he failed to show up for a Moscow-Cuba flight to Cuba on Monday.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is assisting Snowden's run from U.S. authorities, told reporters Monday that Snowden is "healthy and safe" in an undisclosed location awaiting word on his request for asylum by Ecuador.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday that it is the administration's assumption "that he is in Russia."

He also said that officials in China and Hong Kong were notified in plenty of time to block Snowden's departure from Hong Kong. He said the incident "unquestionably" damaged U.S. relations with China.

Although Assange himself is holed up in the Ecuador embassy in Britain to avoid extradition to Sweden, he spoke to reporters Monday to offer the latest on the twists and turns of the 30-year-old analyst who has been charged in U.S. federal court with espionage after acknowledging that he was the source of materials detailing surveillance programs by the U.S. National Security Agency.

Snowden revealed an NSA program that collected telephone records for millions of Americans and a separate operation that targeted the Internet communications of non-citizens abroad who were suspected of terrorist connections.


He initially fled to Hong Kong, then flew to Russia on Sunday in an apparent roundabout trip to Ecuador.

The Russian news site RT reported that Aeroflot had earlier confirmed that two seats had been booked in Snowden's name for Monday's flight to Cuba. But an Aeroflot representative who wouldn't give her name told the Associated Press that Snowden was not on Flight SU150 to Havana. AP reporters on the flight also didn't see him.

"Snowden has gone through registration, but did not physically board the plane and has remained in the transit zone," RIA Novosti quoted an official at Sheremetyevo airport as saying.

Assange would not be specific on Snowden's location but said he is "unlikely to return'' to the U.S., at least under the current administration.

"We are aware of where Mr. Snowden is," Assange told reporters. "He is in a safe place and his spirits are high. Due to the bellicose threats from the U.S. administration ... we cannot reveal what country he is in at this time.'
'
Assange declined to say whether he has spoken personally with the former defense analyst. At the same time, he said Snowden has "expressed no regret in his decision to reveal this important information to the public.''

Assange also said that Russian officials did not have advance notice of Snowden's arrival in Moscow and claimed that Snowden had not been debriefed by Russian security officials.

Assange, also the subject a U.S. investigation into the disclosure of secret American diplomatic cables, said the charges against Snowden are "an attempt to intimidate any country to stand up for his rights to tell the truth.'
'
Russia is under increasing pressure from the United States to block Snowden from further travel.

Snowden, whose U.S. passport has been revoked, fled Hong Kong apparently to avoid a U.S. extradition request and to get asylum eventually in Ecuador. In June 2012. Ecuador gave refuge at its embassy in London to Assange, who is wanted in Sweden for questioning in connection with a sexual assault investigation.

Ecuador Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino has confirmed that Snowden had requested asylum in his country and pledged that his request would be considered in the shortest time possible, according to televised remarks carried by the Latin-American channel Telesur.

RIA Novosti reported at about 2 a.m. Monday morning that Ecuador's Ambassador to Russia, Patricio Alberto Chavez Zavala, was seen leaving Sheremetyevo's transit zone with several people getting into his car.

Interfax reported that Snowden has not been able to leave the airport because he does not have a Russian visa. He was accompanied by WikiLeaks representative Sarah Harrison, a British citizen who does have a Russian visa, according to Interfax.

Earlier the White House urged Russia to consider "all options available," according to National Security Council Spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden.

A Russian security official indicated on Monday that Moscow had no basis to extradite Snowden.

"Snowden has not committed any unlawful act on Russian territory," RIA Novosti quoted an unnamed security official as saying Monday morning. "Russian law enforcement has no order to detain him, so there is no basis to do so."

A Kremlin spokesperson said Monday that the Russian government had no advance knowledge that Snowden was traveling to Moscow, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for President Vladimir Putin, told the Journal that Russia wouldn't intervene in the Snowden matter by holding him or returning him to the U.S. to face charges.

"It is not a question for us," Peskov told the newspaper. "We don't know what his plans are and we were unaware he was coming here."

The South China Morning Post meanwhile reported that Snowden had provided information to show that the NSA had hacked into the Hong Kong system of Pacnet, which runs undersea telecommunications cables around the Pacific, and into 63 computers and servers at Tsinghua University in Beijing, one of China's most elite schools.

"The NSA does all kinds of things like hack Chinese cellphone companies to steal all of your SMS data," Snowden told the newspaper.

Snowden, who was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton as an NSA systems analyst in Hawaii, fled to the Chinese territory of Hong Kong last month with top-secret documents and court orders on government surveillance operations
.
Under Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the city is allowed a high degree of autonomy from mainland Chinese authorities until 2047. It also has its own legal and financial system, a holdover from the British colonial rule that ended in 1997.

Snowden was allowed to leave Hong Kong just hours after Obama administration officials announced they filed a formal petition with Chinese authorities seeking Snowden's arrest and return to the United States.

A Russian lawmaker commented on Monday that the Snowden affair would have little effect on Russia-U.S. relations.

"It won't improve these relations, but it won't harm them," RIA Novosti quoted Leonid Kalashnikov, first deputy head of the State Duma Foreign Affairs Committee, as saying. Kalashnikov added that Russia should give Snowden citizenship and asylum. "Why should he fly to Ecuador? This isn't about a political refugee, but about a humanitarian one."

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers said the U.S. government must exhaust all legal options to get Snowden back.
"Every one of those nations is hostile to the United States," Rogers, R-Mich., said on NBC's Meet the Press.

In New Delhi, Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that the U.S. had put several countries on notice that Snowden is wanted by the U.S. legal system on three felony counts
.
He also took a jab at China and Russia, where Snowden fled to avoid arrest.

"I wonder if Mr. Snowden chose China and Russia as assistance in his flight from justice because they are such powerful bastions of Internet freedom," Kerry told reporters. "And I wonder if, while he was in either of those countries, did he raise the questions of Internet freedom, since that seems to be what he champions."

China's Foreign Ministry distanced itself from any role in Snowden's departure from Hong Kong, saying Monday the territory had the right to make its own decision.

In a routine briefing with reporters, the spokeswoman said Beijing has "always respected" Hong Kong's ability to deal with such matters through its legal system.

She also raised Beijing's concerns about cybersecurity in light of Snowden's allegations, saying that the Chinese government has brought the issue up directly with Washington.

"We are seriously concerned about the cyberattacks that the relevant U.S. government agencies carried out on China as have been recently reported," she said. "This demonstrates again that China is a victim of cyberattacks."

Hong Kong lawmaker and lawyer Albert Ho, whose firm had been representing Snowden in an effort to clarify his legal situation with the government, said he suspects authorities in Beijing were calling the shots.

Ho said an intermediary who claimed to represent the government relayed a message to Snowden saying he was free to leave and should do so.

Ho said he didn't know the identity of the intermediary and wasn't sure whether the person was acting on Hong Kong's or Beijing's behalf.

"The entire decision was probably made in Beijing and Beijing decided to act on its best interests," Ho told reporters. "However, Beijing would not want to be seen on stage because it would affect Sino-U.S. relations. That's why China has somebody acting in the background."

Johnson reported from Washington; Stanglin from McLean, Va.
Contributing: Anna Arutunyan in Moscow; Associated Press
_________________________________
Edward Snowden Blows It Part 1

By Rick Ungar, Contributor
6/20/2013 @ 10:00AM

While it was inevitable that there would be those who support and those who condemn the initial disclosures of Edward Snowden—the 29 year-old former NSA contractor who disclosed the agency’s telephone and electronic communications surveillance programs—the tide of public opinion may be rapidly turning against Snowden…and with very good reason.

Spilling the beans to his fellow Americans over the depth of surveillance being carried out by the National Security Agency within the borders of the United States is one thing—disclosing the nation’s covert activities involving spying on other nations is something else entirely.

Last week, Snowden turned over documents to the South China Morning Post revealing that the United States has been hacking into Chinese computers—a revelation that came at a particularly embarrassing moment for the U.S. President who was busy castigating his Chinese counterpart for China’s constant intrusions into our own computer banks for various purposes, including the theft of American intellectual property.  If that wasn’t enough, the Guardian newspaper followed up with a report provided by Snowden revealing that the Americans and British spied on various delegates attending the G20 conference in 2009, choosing to disclose this bit of information right before the start of this year’s G8 conference held in the U.K.

Anyone think much got accomplished at the G8 after that little gem was brought into the light?

Even more disturbing is what appears to have motivated Snowden to expand his leaking beyond the borders of the United States and into the world of foreign espionage.

Despite making a pretty good living for quite a few years through his employment as a small cog in the gears of government surveillance activities, Snowden declared, during a live chat with the Guardian on Monday, that he believes that all spying is wrong  (SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE).” And because it is Snowden’s personal judgment that all spying is wrong, he also believes it appropriate that he reveal our covert activities to affected foreign governments without a shed of concern for what the rest of his fellow Americans might think about this.

I don’t recall there being an election where I voted to assign my proxy to Edward Snowden so that this 29 year-old guy—who I never heard of before two weeks ago—could determine, on my behalf, what this country should or should not be doing when it comes to its covert, overseas spying program.

So, how is it that Mr. Snowden has decided that it is appropriate to appoint himself the arbiter of judgment and morality when it comes to such issues? How is it that Snowden has determined that he is providing me with some patriotic service when I neither asked him to do so nor agree that disclosing information on foreign spying is, in any way, a service to his nation or to me personally?

With his decision to move beyond informing his countrymen of surveillance activities that allow the government to track our telephone calls and emails, Edward Snowden not only crossed a major line but gave us all reason to feel considerable concern about his motives and purposes.

In discussing the rationale for his disclosures on foreign spying, Snowden said:

“When NSA makes a technical mistake during an exploitation operation, critical systems crash. Congress hasn’t declared war on the countries — the majority of them are our allies — but without asking for public permission, NSA is running network operations against them that affect millions of innocent people. And for what? So we can have secret access to a computer in a country we’re not even fighting? So we can potentially reveal a potential terrorist with the potential to kill fewer Americans than our own Police? No, the public needs to know the kinds of things a government does in its name, or the ‘consent of the governed’ is meaningless.”

There appears to be no shortage of logic fails in Snowden’s remarks.

If the public knows the details of what our government is doing when it comes to spying on foreign governments—as Snowden suggests is necessary—then it wouldn’t be covert spying activity, now would it? Spying is not particularly effective when everyone knows the target and nature of such a program.

And while Ed Snowden may have decided that all spying is wrong, I strongly suspect that the overwhelming majority of Americans would very much disagree with his assessment and might appreciate his not complicating our lives in furtherance of his own self-aggrandizement and the soothing of whatever crisis of conscience he may be experiencing.

(Continue reading)

Edward Snowden Blows It Part 2

What should further concern us all is not just that Edward Snowden has decided that we must now live with his judgments and moral determinations when it comes to how we conduct foreign policy, but that those judgments are based on a shocking degree of naiveté as Snowden doesn’t seem capable of grasping that in the world in which we live, our allies are not always our friends.

Snowden also appears to have missed civics class on the day when it was explained that the United States is a Republic where we elect people to make decisions on these matters and then judge the effectiveness of those decisions by deciding who we will keep in office and who we will turn away.

The bottom line here is that I really don’t care if Ed Snowden thinks all spying is wrong and neither do most Americans. This being the case, I have considerable difficulty with his decision to disclose the nation’s secrets to foreign governments just because he could.

I do care what the President thinks about our foreign spying operations just as I care about what Congress and the Judiciary think. It is their opinions and practices that I can either support or reject when I show up to vote. And while I may appreciate Mr. Snowden’s decision to inform his countrymen of surveillance programs involving spying on Americans, there is no claim nor evidence that spying on foreign entities crosses any legal lines and, therefore, it is incredibly wrong for Snowden to reveal data involving our spying programs outside the country.

Until I cast a vote for Edward Snowden to make such determinations for me, I would very much appreciate it if he would shut up and get over whatever psychological complexes are driving him to make these decisions on my behalf. He is doing neither me nor the country any favors.

Contact Rick at thepolicypage@gmail.com and follow me on Twitter and Facebook FB -2.16%.

UPDATE: A few readers have expressed concern over my statement that Snowden believes that all spying is wrong. The following is his quote on the subject and the interpretation by Time Magazine which mirrors my own.  I’ll leave it to the reader to decide if this is what he is saying or not. I certainly think it is.

Zeke Miller, comparing the perspective of Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, writes in response to the answers Snowden provides in his 90 minute Q and A on the Guardian’s website:

“Both men suggest that much, if not all, American spying abroad is wrong, including the spying on allies and foreign leaders that perhaps every government has practiced for decades, if not centuries.” Miller continues, “There were other clear echoes of Assange’s past remarks in Snowden’s responses Monday. Both men suggest that much, if not all, American spying abroad is wrong (emphasis added) , including the spying on allies and foreign leaders that perhaps every government has practiced for decades, if not centuries.

I recommend reading Miller’s column to see how and why he correctly reaches this opinion.
____________________________
No Doubts – Snowden is a Traitor
John R. Houk
© June 24, 2013
__________________________
Report: Snowden took job to gather NSA cyber evidence

Copyright Gannett 2013
________________________
Edward Snowden Blows It Part 1 & 2

Rick Ungar:

I am Forbes' official 'token lefty,' as the title of the page suggests. However, writing from the 'left of center' should not be confused with writing for the left as I often annoy progressives just as much as I upset conservative thinkers. In addition to the pages of Forbes.com, you can find me every Saturday morning on your TV arguing with my more conservative colleagues on "Forbes on Fox" on the Fox News Network and at various other times during the week serving as a liberal talking head on other Fox News and Fox Business Network shows. I also serve as a Democratic strategist with Mercury Public Affairs.

2013 Forbes.com LLC™   All Rights Reserved

Unrequested editing in last two articles: John R. Houk

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Terrorists' Trojan Horse

Islamic Trojan Horse to USA
Justin Smith continues his thoughts on the Boston Marathon Bombing and the Tsarnaev brothers.

JRH 4/25/13
***********************************
Terrorists' Trojan Horse

By Justin O. Smith
Sent 4/24/2013 10:11 AM

Unlike the killing of Osama bin Laden, Barack "Mr. How Did This Happen" Obama had nothing to do with the killing and capture of the two Boston Marathon bombers on April 19, 2013. That honor and America's thanks are reserved for the long intense and tireless hours invested by the good men and women of the Boston Police Department, as they were aided by an FBI that has practically been neutered during the past decade; however, the joint decision to release photos of the suspects and the authorities plea for the public's assistance started a chain of events, beginning with "shots fired" blasting over police scanners at 10:24pm EST, that led to 26 year old Tamerlan Tsarnaev's death and the capture of 19 year old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in a land-locked boat as he bled out. But the back story and entire picture is the definition of complex, and it opens hundreds of questions that demand answers.

The two men are brothers of Chechen descent who had lived in Kazakhstan with their family, as well as Dagestan, where they were schooled in earlier years. They left Dagestan, which is 99% Muslim, at ages 8 and 15, and they received asylum in the U.S. in 2002 with the help of Patemat Sulemanova, an aunt from Toronto, Canada.

Tamerlan grew to adulthood as a devout Muslim, which he expounded on in the article 'Will Box For Passport', highlighting his Golden Gloves boxing career. Somewhere in his journeys, Tamerlan became disillusioned with life in America, due to its policy concerning Chechnyan "rebels"/terrorists; and, according to the FBI, websites he visited show that he leaned heavily towards the radical messages of violent Islamic jihad, as he also influenced his younger brother to join him. If he felt like an outsider in America, as many have suggested, why didn't he just leave?

The Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge is where Dzhokhar worshipped. Its website states, "We strive to embody the 'middle path' to which the Qur'an calls-a path of moderation that is free of extremism." But moderation is an allusive creature in Islam, and it is almost always far removed from Western civilization's concept of "moderation."

Dagestan is historically an ancient Muslim region with an ever increasing Islamist presence; Chechnya is a breeding ground for fanatical Islamic jihadists, who are presently heavily influenced by Saudi money, Al Qaeda and Wahhabiism. Chechnya's vicious "holy warriors" are the very same islamofascists, serving under Shamil Basayev, who planted a radiological bomb made of 70 pounds of cesium-137 outside of Moscow on November 23, 1995... the same vicious, callous murderers of over 200 school children in Beslan, North Ossetia-Russia in 2004.

Ironically, seven months ago, Dzhokhar raised his hand on September 11th and swore allegiance to these United States of America, as he became a U.S. citizen; in February 2012, Tamerlan, who has a green card, visited his father in Makhachkala, Dagestan, and they both went to Chechnya to visit relatives, according to the father of these two subhuman terrorists. This trip has come under close scrutiny. Why wasn't Tamerlan questioned by the FBI when he returned from a regional hot-bed of terrorism on July 17, 2012, especially since he had already been flagged as an "extremist" by the Russian government?

Yes, in 2011 Russia had asked the FBI to interview Tamerlan, because they knew he planned a visit in 2012, and he had already strongly condemned Russian actions against Chechnya on Vkontakte, a popular Russian website. The FBI questioned and released him, not too unlike what they did with the Islamic assassins Major Nidal Hassan and Carlos Bledsoe. Upon Tamerlan's return to the U.S., it was an incumbent imperative that the FBI question him and attempt to discern if he had met with any islamofascist groups or received any training.

These animals, the Tsarnaev brothers, have a mother who professes their innocence and says, "They were set up...they were good boys." Their aunt from Toronto agrees in the face of enough damning evidence that no jury in their right mind will ever find Dzhokhar "innocent" or "not guilty" when he answers to the U.S. legal system. The aunt said in broken English, "I'm lawyer from back home...give me evidence...only show man's face standing like this... The FBI shows me only this. What else?" Maybe she will believe video from the actual Boston bomb site or later multiple witnesses' statements and police video that show her "innocent" nephews shooting at police and throwing bombs that lit up the night sky; or, perhaps she thinks that police officer Richard H. Donohue critically wounded himself in the leg and MIT police officer Sean Collier killed himself, as part of the conspiracy she suggested. How will she explain the suicide vest worn by Tamerlan?

Remziya Suleyman, director of American Center for Outreach, is a political advocate for Muslims in the Nashville area. She is paraphrased in 'The Tennessean' saying, "there's no justification for their (the Boston bombers) actions. No religion or political belief justifies this kind of violence." She has no credibility, and this statement carries no weight in light of previous comments she has made showing complete disdain for the U.S. Constitution. I don't put anything past her or those like her.

Similarly, CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad said, "We must remain united as a nation as we face those who would carry out such heinous and inexcusable crimes." These are pretty words and meaningless words from a man who has consorted and conspired with known convicted terrorists, suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations for decades. This is all documented in FBI and federal criminal court documents.

An uncle, who had little contact with the Tsarnaev brothers since 2005, said that he was ashamed of what they had done. He called for Dzhokhar to turn himself in and "beg forgiveness from the victims", if he was still alive. He said, "This is not what Chechen people are like (maybe he and his friends are exceptions)...we are good people. I love this country America that has given so much good and opportunity to the Chechen people."

Despite the protestations of the bombers' uncle and many Muslims, this is exactly what a huge percentage of Chechens and Muslims are like. They are only peaceful, until violence serves their purpose. This violence is the face of Islam in its purest form, just as Mohammed decreed it in his last teachings... reform of Islam has never been attainable for those who sought such. And all Muslims know it!

Even the Left-Wing Media seemed to cringe in a politically correct fit, and they couldn't even say the word "muslim" in conjunction with this investigation. Yes, America has seen Her share of Una-Bombers, Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrns-the Weather Underground terrorists and Timothy McVeighs, but in this decade, 99% of all terrorist acts have been Islamic in origin and Muslim instigated; over and over, MSNBC and CNN reporters pointed to "right-wing extremists", anti-abortionists, Christians, Tea Party members and returning military veterans. They were so afraid of insulting Muslims that they could not even present unvarnished fact as it related to this terror act. This was a travesty and a sham delivery of "the news", and in light of the public safety and national security implications that they so willingly ignored, they must be held accountable! And someone needs to flatly state: The victims of the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15, 2013 were murdered by Muslim Chechen islamofascist terrorists!

Why has the Obama administration increased the number of Saudis allowed into the U.S. annually from 12,000 to over 100,000, in each year he has been in office?

Our government seems unable to find solutions or deal with a growing Islamic problem in the U.S., which contains approximately 8 million Muslims, not counting Muslims in the U.S. illegally such as Hezbollah agents; the American people were told a few years ago that jihadists would start using white-European-looking Muslims for their terrorist acts, and while we do not ban the free exchange of ideas in the pursuit of knowledge and enlightenment, we do not have to give open access in America to movements, ideas/ideologies that are actively seeking our destruction, such as Islam and communism (we ferreted out Nazis during WWII). Converts are a factor too, but until, and if ever, Islam mounts a real reform in every Islamic nation globally, the U.S. must halt all immigration from Islamic nations; the exceptions would be those who can show they are Christians in need of asylum/refugee status. And going ten steps forward, America should expel all non-U.S. citizen Muslims immediately (for that matter anyone here illegally): Any U.S citizen Muslim with known and proven terrorist ties, unless also guilty of a terrorist act against the U.S., should be expelled with all due precipitous haste to the Islamic nation of their choice: Immigration is the terrorists' Trojan Horse!

By Justin O. Smith
_________________________
© Justin O. Smith
Edited by John R. Houk

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Europe and U.S. Need a Double Take on Muslim Migration

Islamic Trojan House
John R. Houk
© February 24, 2011

European nations have stuck their heads in the sand when it comes to immigration or political asylum from Muslim Middle Eastern nations. I believe Europe’s deal is if you have job skills you can immigrate to work. Or perhaps even if people with Islamist credentials are given political asylum because they are fleeing a repressive dictatorship (or even by Western standards a moderate Muslim nation) that might result in death if caught.

The leadership of Germany, France and the United Kingdom has finally come to the politically incorrect conclusion that putting faith in multiculturalism has become ruinous because national cohesion is becoming threatened. Of course I don’t believe anyone had the guts to reference Muslims but everyone knows who these leaders were speaking of.

The blogger at 1683 AD is promoting the idea that the immigration and political asylum policy of accommodating immigrating or fleeing Muslims should change especially with the upheaval spreading from Muslim Maghreb through the Muslim Middle East with grassroots activism threatening to bring the status quo down. The 1683 AD blog goes out of its way to point out that actual persecuted people that definitely are Islamists should NOT be allowed to immigrate or flee toward European political asylum. Although there are more examples the classic group allowed safe haven in Europe should be people like the Egyptian Coptic Christians and the Middle Eastern Assyrian Christians.

Residing in America, 1683 AD’s idea should also be implemented in the good old USA as well. I believe it is such a good idea that students from the Middle East should NOT be given student visas at least not until American hatred subsides. I mean a Saudi living in Texas on a student visa was busted with plans and charts to make a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD). The American-hating Saudi Muslim’s name is Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari. It is time for some good old fashion religious profiling before anyone from the Muslim world is allowed to enter America. When will America wake up from the stupor of political correctness when it comes to Islam?

JRH 2/24/11