Abbreviated Censored Posts Directed to CPCR or to
ORIGINAL Websites
By John R. Houk
© June 3, 2023
This is continued from PART
ONE.
Some of the Blogger email notifications of reasons for
unpublishing were typically one of two lame quoted reasons:
“Your post titled ‘WHATEVER
THE TITLE WAS’ was flagged to us for review. We have determined that
it violates our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at …REMOVED
LINK”
OR
“Why was your blog post
unpublished? Your content has violated our Malware and Viruses policy.” INCLUDING
& ORIGINAL BLOGGER LINK
Remember the time was over a decade ago. I find it CRAZY
WOKE that an updated guideline triggers past censorship.
It turns out some of the Blogger unpublished posts are so
old they did not even make it to the old NCCR (now CPCR). Some where an intro
pointing to the now removed SlantRight.com website. Since SlantRight.com
has ceased to exist, I’m not going to try and find the original text on a computer
that may not exist. I did not even know what Cloud storage was over a decade
ago.
BUCKLE UP FOR ANCIENT CENSORSHIP RIDE – In order of
censorship rather actual posting order
1. “Mass s****r in our schools: the terrorists’
chilling plan” [The Blogger version of this post will attempt to obscure
words that I can guess rubs WOKE censors the wrong way.]
January 2007
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2007/01/mass-slaughter-in-our-schools.html
No post on NCCR/CPCR
Photo of Mourners Perhaps Family
This essay is something I have never considered would happen
as a terrorist act in America: Children as the target of Islamofascist
terrorists. Of course it was unfathomable that the murders of 9/11 would occur.
Here is the theme: Islamofascist terrorists will develop a modified plan of
something similar to Russia in taking over a school. Part of the plan is to
rape the women (teachers) and girls (students) followed by forced labor of male
students in fortifications followed by summary executions.
Friends I know it is politically incorrect to utilize
religious profiling (this is beyond racial profiling), however it is better to
fall on the side of safety in a war in which the enemy is convinced about its
means and has zero moral constraint to execute those means.
Then a Link to defunct SlantRight.com followed by another
photo deceased child victims of Muslim terrorists.
++++++++++++++++++++
2. An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, Part
11
June 2008
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/06/ethical-basis-for-war-against-political_28.html
Could not locate “Part 11” on
NCCR/CPCR
Photo: Divided Flag- USA & Islam
Here is the last installment from Political Islam [Updated
embedded link] educating Americans about being more offensive rather than the
politically correct notion of defensive, passive or darn right ambivalent
toward Islam.
READ IT! [UPDATED LINK – Political Islam now functions under CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF POLITICAL ISLAM
INTERNATIONAL
Website (CSPII): https://www.politicalislam.com/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-11/
JRH [SlantRight.com embedded link] 6/28/08
CSPII links to all Eleven parts:
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 11
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 10
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 9
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 8
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 7
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 6
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 5
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 4
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 3
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 2
An
Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam, part 1
+++++++++++++++
3. Warner: The Fruit of Islam
September 2009
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2009/09/warner-fruit-of-islam.html
Could not locate on NCCR/CPCR
Photo: Muslim Holding Sign- Freedom Go To Hell
Have you heard of the Islamic
Golden Age [Updated Link]? The phrase implies an age of dynamic
growth of intelligence and technology. Indeed the Muslim to this day considers
Islamic civilization to be the best that ever has existed on planet earth. Why?
Islamic civilization is derived from Islam and Islam exists from the direct
mouth of Allah as recorded in the Quran.
Let us see just how superior Islamic civilization is. Think of the continuing
growth of Western Civilization and compare the so-called perfect Islamic
civilization that has grown from the so-called Golden Age.
Bill Warner
provides [Updated link] some statistics and thoughts to
solidify your mental comparison.
JRH [Defunct SlantRight.com link] 9/18/09
+++++++++++++++
4. Debating About Islam, Part 1
July 2008
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/07/debating-about-islam-part-1.html
NCCR/CPCR Link: https://oneway2day.com/2008/07/31/debating-about-islam-part-1/
Photo: No to Islam
Are you a Muslim? If you answer that you are not a Muslim,
then this essay about responding to pro-Muslim points will be of interest to
you.
Do you have a friend (or even a very good friend) that is a Muslim? If you do
then Bill Warner’s Political Islam [UPDATED LINK] essay is of interest to you.
Are you critical of Islam and Muslims come down on you defending their faith as
a religion of peace
[UPDATED LINK]? Then this essay entitled Debating
About Islam, Part 1 [UPDATED LINK] is for you.
JRH [defunct
SlantRight.com link] 7/30/08
The NCCR/CPCR
post has the 2008 version of the Political Islam post which will links
that need updated.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5. Barbary Pirates and Somali Pirates
April 2009
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2009/04/barbary-pirates-and-somali-pirates.html
NCCR/CPCR Link: https://oneway2day.com/2009/04/17/barbary-pirates-and-somali-pirates/
Photo: Barbary Pirates - 911 Islamic Terrorists Twin
Towers
John R. Houk
© April 16, 2009
D. L. Adams writes about the similarities between the
Islamic Barbary Pirates of our Founding Fathers and the Islamic Somali Pirates
of today.
I think the underlying point Adams is making is that President Barack Hussein
Obama is telling Muslim leaders, "We will convey our deep
appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over so many
centuries to shape the world for the better, including my own country.”
Adams points out two things about BHO’s statement:
• BHO did not mention those
Islamic contributions to America.
• The only very real contribution of Islam to America was the inspiration to
build a Navy that could operate in international waters rather than just mere
coastal and river patrols.
The point made about BHO not mentioning those Islamic
contributions is because there are none
[Link Redirects to The
Global Politician. A search for the link produced no results].
The second point about the U.S. Navy is because the Barbary Pirates kept raiding
American ships and taking captives for ransom or slavery. Because of
information Thomas Jefferson acquired as an Ambassador, when he became
President he astutely realized paying tribute (a form of dhimmi tax that we can
call jizya) would be perpetual. So he built up the Navy and sent the Marines to
the shores of Tripoli to fight our nation’s battle.
The Somali Pirates are not typical thugs or even peg legged sailors with an
eye-patch. There is plenty of evidence that the Somali Pirates are radical Islamic
terrorists with a huge connection with the likes of al Qaeda.
For years, I've decried--on this
site and elsewhere--the use
of the term "pirates" in connection with the Somalians who seize
ships [SECURE
LINK VERSION TO SAME POST] off the coast of Africa and demand
ransom. They are violent, they are Muslim, and they are tied to Al-Qaeda.
And, yes, they are TERRORISTS. Islamic terrorists. You know, the "Religion
of Peace." (Debbie
Schlussel [SECURE
LINK VERSION TO SAME POST])
The issue more than just piracy, it is the act of Muslims
following the tenets of their holy books. I am convinced attacking the kafir
owned ships does not affect Islamic raiding pirates. It is their right and
obligation just as old Mo provided the example for them.
Just as our Founding Fathers came to this conclusion, let us pray that the
Obama Administration perceives as a big picture and not as an opportunity to
use his agenda of compartmentalizing
trouble global trouble spots [defunct SlantRight.com link].
JRH 4/16/09
Below this point I cross posted a 2009 version of Political Islam
article by D.L. Adams posted on SlantRight. I tried to update by adding
the SlantRight 2009 format to NCCR/CPCR but had Wordpress formatting
issues. I guess my tech education is still lacking. You can view my lacking
Wordpress effort HERE.
The tech people of CSPIII/Political have preserved the post but in my opinion
did a poor job distinguishing quoted material from D.L. Adam’s content. Below
is the title and attribution post credit from CSPII, but you’ll have to click
the link to read it.
Those Who Ignore History Are Condemned – Somali Piracy in
Context
Posted by Bill Warner
By D.L. Adams
Apr 14 2009
CSPII/Political Islam
https://www.politicalislam.com/those-who-ignore-history-are-condemned/
++++++++++++++++++
6. David Bukay on Islamic Abrogation
June 2008
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2008/06/david-bukay-on-islamic-abrogation.html
Could not locate on NCCR/CPCR
Truth About I-S-L-A-M photo
John R. Houk
© June 21, 2008
Well I am still trying to catch up on my e-newsletter
reading. I am a bit behind.
I just finished reading a Political
Islam [SECURE
UPDATED CSPII/Political Islam LINK] e-newsletter posted
by Bill Warner; however the essay is by Dr. David Bukay (Ph. D.), a teacher of
Political Science at the University of Haifa in Israel.
I’ll let Bill Warner continue the introduction of Dr. Bukay.
Dr. Bukay’s theme is the Mohammedan concept of “Abrogation.” I was enthralled
by the reading because the essay has brought further clarity about the
Mohammedan propaganda that Mohammedanism is a religion of peace. Dr. Bukay is
specific on how the “Abrogation” doctrine in Mohammedanism demonstrates that
Mohammedans that tell Westerners that “Jihad” is an inner struggle for peace
and not an outer violent struggle to violently spread Mohammedanism to the
Kafir (infidels) or enslave them or kill them.
When I read this essay I thought of a clear difference between Mohammedanism
and Christianity. That difference being Mohammedans “Abrogate” certain
(considered) holy writings to
abrogate other holy writings. I’ll
allow Dr. Bukay to enlighten you on the specifics which he does way better than
I could.
Being a Christian Right kind of guy this Biblical Scripture leaped into my
mind:
Jesus Christ is the same
yesterday, today and forever. (Hebrews 13: 8 NKJV)
From a Christian Trinitarian perspective is three persons in
ONE GOD. Much like a human being is a spirit that has a soul (mental faculties
of emotions) and lives in a body: that existence is a three in one proposition.
Keep that in the back of your mind when you read this essay on “Abrogation” or
when a Mohammedan might try and tell you his “Allah” is just as never changing
and thus the same as the Christian God.
One more thing: This essay is lengthy. Take your time to read it. You might to
come back to it two or three times to finish it. The post is so long that I
believe Political Islam poster Bill Warner’s Blog could not
handle the entirety of the post. The post is incomplete at the link I will
provide. Now the e-newsletter has the entirety of Dr. Bukay’s essay which I
hope my blog can fit all in one post.
JRH 6/21/08
****************************
[Blog Editor: The information from David Bukay is of paramount importance for
non-Muslims (ESCPECIALLY CHRISTIANS & JEWS] to digest! The point: The
violent hate portions written late (or in Muhammad’s case – spoken)
later render the peaceful portions written earlier to overturned as a warring
Muslim seems fit to use. Propaganda-wise, non-Muslims MUST understand this when
they are proselytized with such lies as “Islam is peace”. Because the Political
Islam is lengthy, I’m truncating it here. Hopefully CSPII keeps the content up.]
Abrogation and the Koran
Posted by Bill Warner
Guest content by David Bukay
June 18, 2008
CSPII/Political
Islam
Guest Columnist
Dr. Bukay and I have differing opinions about abrogation and
how it fits into the concept of duality. But we both agree that knowledge about
the foundational doctrine of Islam is essential for having any rational
discussion about Islam. This idea is denied by the FBI, Homeland Security,
politicians, universities and the media. They advocate asking a Muslim and
believing whatever he says. You just need to find the right Muslim and then say
the others are not “real” Muslims. Our authorities are Muslim-ologists, while
Dr. Bukay and I are foundationalists. We study the doctrine found in the Koran,
Sira and Hadith. We know that Islam makes Muslims. It is simple cause and
effect.
You should know as you read this article, that it is the
final word. There are no more subtle arguments or intricate intellectual moves
that can refute it. Dr. Bukay deals with the very DNA of Islam and his work is
authoritative. This article lacks one thing that would make it academically
proper–footnotes. The footnotes did not move from his Word document to our HTML
editor and I just did not want to put in the hour needed to do that work. This
is a political newsletter, not an academic paper. My apologies, but if there is
any source you want, let me know by email.
David Bukay (Ph.D.), teaches at the School of Political
Science in the University of Haifa. His main fields are: International
Terrorism and Islamic fanaticism; al-Qaeda and World Jihad; Inter-Arab
Relations and the Arab Israeli Conflict; State and Conflict in the Middle East;
the Arab State: Militarism vs. Islamism; Syria, Lebanon and Israel: the
Politics of Power Politics.
His last two books are: Yasser Arafat: the Politics
of Paranoia (Mellen Press, 2005) and From Muhammad to Bin
Ladin (Transaction, 2007). He has written numerous articles (mostly in
Hebrew). his forthcoming book is Arab-Islamic Colonialist Expansionism:
Islamization and Arabization of the Dar al-Islam
Mekkan Peace or Medinan Jihad? Abrogation in Islam
David Bukay
School of Political Science – The University of Haifa
In his e-mail to Robert Spencer on February 14 2005, Dr.
Jamal Badawi, one of the best known Muslim speakers in the West for the last
two decades, wrote: The Qur’an prohibits compulsion in religion [2:256]. It
teaches the Oneness of God, acceptance and respect of all prophets [2:285],
broad human brotherhood [49:13], acceptance of plurality [5:48; 11:118],
universal justice and fair dealing [4:134, 5:8]. It demands just, kind and
respectful treatment of those who co-exist peacefully with Muslims [60:8-9].
Peaceful dialogue with the People of the Book and the emphasis on common
grounds with them is a repeated theme in the Qur’an [3:64; 29:46, 5:5]. Those
who erroneously claimed that all such definitive verses have all been
“abrogated” by what they called “the verse of the sword” were mistaken and
failed to give any definitive evidence of their claims. There is no single
verse in the Qur’an properly interpreted in its context and historical
circumstances that ever allowed the Muslim to fight non-Muslims simply because
they are non-Muslims…
This list sums up most of the contemporary Islamic
propaganda in hundreds of internet sites and thousands of various publications.
Muslim propagandists purposely quote verses from the Qur’an that were written
in the early days of Islam at Mecca, where Muhammad was weak and his followers
were few and vulnerable, passages that make Islam appear a religion of peace.
However, the Islamic propaganda that claims that the Meccan verses are dominant
in Islamic teaching, is either ignorant of actual Islamic doctrine and tidings,
or it practices a sophisticated deception. The second option is a possibility,
since Muhammad is quoted to have saying: “war is deceit,” and it is also
sanctioned in the Qur’an that Allah deceives the unbelievers and the
hypocrites:
The hypocrites try to deceive Allah,
but he deceives them…
Remember, when the infidels contrived to make you a prisoner, or murder or to
expel you, they plotted, but Allah also plotted, and Allah’s plot is the best.
[wa-Allah jabur-l-micriun]
It is not only because there are so many aggressive verses
that incite for killing, slaughtering and decapitations from the Medina period,
the second era of Muhammad’s career when he became strong and victorious, but
also mainly because the Meccan verses were nullified, abrogated, and rendered
void. The problem is the Western politicians, many members of the academia and
communication media who are not only unaware and perhaps ignorant of this
reality, but also disseminate, intentionally or unintentionally, the tidings of
the Islamic propaganda. This behavior is contrary even to the basic interests
of the Free World, but also exacerbates the reality as it is seen by
contemporary Islamic terrorism, violence and aggressiveness.
Indeed, Medinan verses are totally different from the
Meccan’s, concerning treatment, the relationship and the practical policies
toward the infidels, or actually all the non-Muslims. Nevertheless, … GO TO
CSPII/Political Islam TO FINISH READING
+++++++++++++++++++++
7. Intro to Warner Critique of Sharia Law
February 2009
Unpublished Link: http://slantedright.blogspot.com/2009/02/intro-to-warner-critique-of-sharia-law.html
NCCR/CPCR Post: https://oneway2day.com/2009/02/24/intro-to-warner-critique-of-sharia-law/
Photo: Political Toon- Sharia Interference a Hate Crime
There is NO doubt as to where Bill Warner stands relating to
what adherents call Islam (I usually prefer the politically incorrect
‘Mohammedan’).
Warner of PoliticalIslam.com [UPDATED
TO SECURE LINK] views Islam in a black and white mode. Either a Muslim follows
that which is deemed perfect (e.g. Quran and Sharia Law) or he is not a good
Muslim.
I’m a little less harsh. Judaism is roughly divided into Orthodox, Conservative
and Reformed. Reformed is really Judaism light.
Christianity even has more strains, yet the strains of thought are basically
Conservative (some call Fundamentalist or Biblical), Conservative yet more into
Christian tradition than Biblical authority and the various divisions of
progressive Christians (which actually seek a secular humanist spirituality
that runs counter too much of the Bible).
So my reasoning is certainly a reform movement is possible for Mohammedanism. A
good place to see a reform of Islam beginning is at the website Muslims Against Sharia [Blog
Editor: This link to Reform Islam is NOT the same site as 2009. It goes to an
anti-gambling page and browser popped up a warning. A Duck-Duck-Go search found
no website ‘Muslims Against Sharia’. Searching for “Reform Islam” led me
to this website: Muslim
Reform Movement. As the next sentence in this post indicates,
reforming Islam would mean Muslims abandoning the so-called believed divine
nature of their prophet Muhammad. That’s a difficult proposition for devoted
Muslims to embrace.]. Bill Warner would call such Mohammedans “hypocrites.”
Warner’s thinking is that if a Mohammedan does not follow that which is called
perfect (as in an incorruptible divine sense) cannot be reformed but only
practiced.
But hey, if a Mohammedan movement brings Islam out of the medieval history into
a 21st century mindset that violence is not justified as a continuation
of da’wa
[Blog Editor: Clicking this link redirected to a secure link on Atheism
and Agnosticism, which I am convinced was not my intention in 2009.
Searching Duck-Duck-Go the more anglicized word “dawah” led me to a post
that was probably closer to my thinking in 2009: Dawah:
The Call to Islam is Deceptive, Dangerous and Deadly; By John Guandolo; Understanding The Threat;
8/29/16] (Christians would call this evangelism) by means of violent
jihad.
I am with Warner in his criticism of Mohammedans who indeed call the Quran and
Sharia Law perfect and out of the same mouth say they are moderate peaceful
Muslims. If I was a sci/fi robot I would have to say, “That does not compute.”
Now I say all this to get you ready for a critique of Sharia Law by Bill
Warner. It is a harsh critique that is true for all Muslims that believe in the
perfection of their considered holy writings. Read it!
JRH
[INOPERATIVE SlantRight.com LINK] 2/23/09 [Old SlantRight.com
post shared at CPCR
updated post]IP
Photo: Break Sharia Law-Bosch Fawstin toon
END OF PART TWO – PART THREE WILL BE UPCOMING TO ARCHIVE
BLOGGER CENSORSHIP
JRH 6/3/23
READER
SUPPORTED!
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Please
Support SlantRight 2.0
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online store: My Store
(please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
