Judging by its initial success, conservative author and
filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza’s new film, “2000 Mules,” is getting folks’ attention
despite the Left’s near-total news blackout of it. And frankly, we can’t blame
them for wishing it would go away — because it makes them look like they stole
a presidential election.
The film, which documents and corroborates claims of
significant voter fraud in tightly contested swing states during the 2020
election, grossed more than $1 million in its first 12 hours of streaming
on Rumble and
subscription-based platform Locals.
This is the film Joe “81 Million Votes” Biden and his “most
secure election in history” apologists and censors don’t want to talk about. And
they definitely don’t want you to see it. But folks are seeing it anyway.
According to Rumble, “The movie’s gross sales on Rumble and Locals, which began
on Saturday at noon, are good enough to put ‘2000 Mules’ in the estimated box
office top ten for the weekend of May 6th to May 8th.”
To anyone willing to think openly and honestly about it, the
2020 election was deeply suspect. COVID-inspired, Democrat-supported bulk-mail
balloting made this an election unlike any other, and it
opened the floodgates to potential ballot fraud — especially via the largely
illegal practice of ballot harvesting, which is the collection, transportation,
and delivering of any ballots other than one’s own.
To recap: The incumbent, Donald Trump, earned 12 million
more votes than any Republican candidate in history and handily carried an
astounding 18 of 19 “bellwether” counties across the nation, and yet still
got seven million fewer votes than gaffe-prone,
basement-bound, cognitively challenged Joe Biden — a guy whose candidacy was so
awful, so utterly uninspiring, that in the primaries he finished a dismal
fourth in Iowa and fifth in New Hampshire before getting clobbered by 26 points
in Nevada by Bernie Sanders. But somehow, Biden managed to haul in 81 million
votes in the general.
That’s more
population-adjusted votes than a far younger, far more compelling, infinitely
more charismatic Barack Obama got in 2008.
Something didn’t add up, but the mainstream media wasn’t
about to go digging for it. Instead, that would be up to a private citizen, one
Catherine Engelbrecht, who years ago founded True the Vote, a nonprofit
election integrity organization. (For her efforts, she was repeatedly targeted
and harassed by the Obama administration in the run-up to his
2012 reelection.)
The result of Engelbrecht’s digging is a film that puts the
lie to the New York Times’s ridiculous front-page headline, published just
after the 2020 vote: “Election Officials Nationwide Find No Fraud.” How on
earth could the Times have known? How much time did its staff devote to a
comprehensive nationwide forensic analysis of the 2020 vote? (That’s a
rhetorical question.) As Newsweek reports:
Engelbrecht said her group [True
the Vote] spent $1 million to obtain geospatial information from several
marketing services that she agreed not to name and $20,000 to obtain video via
open-records requests to counties and cities in five states where it appeared Trump
was winning, until mail-in and drop-box ballots were counted: Georgia, Arizona,
Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. From there, she says she and her staff
cross-referenced the times and locations of the cell phones whose users visited
multiple drop boxes with the 4 million minutes of video obtained from city and
county governments.
All of this is chronicled in “2000 Mules,” in which D'Souza
shows how True the Vote painstakingly used three trillion cellphone
geotracking signals and surveillance video to reveal “a network of ‘mules’ in
battleground states busily collecting ballots from get-out-the-vote NGOs and
stuffing them, a few at a time, into multiple drop boxes in the dead of night.”
The geotracking signals obtained were those near drop boxes and also near
election nonprofits from October 1, 2020, through to the election on November
3, and through the Georgia runoff date of January 6, 2021.
As The New York Post’s Miranda Devine writes:
“The data pattern is unmistakable, as D'Souza shows a spider web of routes
taken by various mules between NGOs and drop boxes. For each of the 2,000 mules
the average number of drop box visits was 38, with an average five ballots
deposited per visit. That’s 380,000 suspect votes.”
Remember: Only 43,000 votes decided the election in the
three battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. And this process
of “ballot trafficking” is how the Democrats carried it off.
Their best defense? A weak and deeply denialist statement from
their water carriers at PolitiFact, which complains about “dramatic horror
movie music with grainy video footage.”
We’re happy to let you decide whose account is more
plausible.
In the meantime, though, let’s keep an eye on the Democrats
— specifically, whether they’ll try to run the same bulk-mail ballot scheme
during November’s midterm elections. All it’ll take is another
good COVID scare.
Updated to include specific data on the average number of
drop-box visits and ballot deposits by the mules.
The Patriot Post is
protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the
Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in
accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.
Mike Lindell is a Patriot using his resources to resist the
Dem-Marxist coup perpetrated in the 2020 Election. Frankly, I have doubts
anyone can reverse that coup. BUT keeping the facts before Americans about the
Dem-Marxist evil in 2020 can flood the evil with truth. Truth has the potential
to either reset a future fair election OR set the stage for massive resistance
to Dem-Marxism which uncontrollable local unrest leads to a national restoration
of the Founders’ Republic.
Lindell’s latest effort can be found at LindellTV. It is called “Scientific
Proof”. The direct video link for Scientific Proof is https://scientificproof.fyi/.
There is a free download to avoid censorship. I am using the Rumble
version for the cross post on my Blog.
JRH 4/1/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on
New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist.
On March 31st, Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, released a
one-hour television special entitled, Scientific Proof: Internationally
Renowned Physicist Absolutely Proves 2020 Election Was Biggest Cyber-Crime in
World History.
The special broadcast features Dr. Douglas Frank who holds a
Ph.D. in Surface Analytical Chemistry for the University of Cincinnati. Dr.
Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific
publications. In 1990 Dr. Frank discovered and invented a technique for
creating three dimensional images of molecules resting on surfaces. This led to
a cover article in Science Magazine, which is the most read science magazine in
the world by scientists, and he was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in
Europe.
Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 election
following the data of the election returns county by county across such states
as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few. Dr. Frank’s scientific and
mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber
fraud in the 2020 election.
In the television special Dr. Frank testifies to host Mike
Lindell that deviations and mathematical impossibilities could not have been
done by humans, by artificial intelligence and computers that were running
before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. election.
Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national
census data was used to manipulate the 2020 election rolls and to inject
phantom votes into the election totals. His scientific investigation documented
and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than
lived in many of the counties.
The injection of the 2010 national census data into the 2020
election rolls facilitated a crime that some experts are calling the largest
cyber-crime in world history.
Dr. Frank explains that the 2010 census was used to actually
cast votes for voters that had either passed away or no longer lived in the
county or state.
In numerous documented cases, voters showed up to vote at
their precinct only to be told they had already voted, when in fact, they had
not voted. What is now being revealed by the scientific investigation of Dr.
Frank is that these Americans had their vote cast for them through a highly
sophisticated computer program.
In this television special, Dr. Frank explains to Mike
Lindell what tipped him off that a cyber-crime had been committed — not in just
a few precincts, counties or swing states, but on a national basis. Dr. Frank
also reveals that even in the states President Trump won, the President won
those states by larger numbers than was reported.
Scientific Proof is the follow up to the two hour docuMovie,
Absolute Proof, that was released on February 5, 2021, and was seen by 70
million people in the first four days of its release, and over 150 million to
date across 42 countries. Like Absolute Proof, the executive producers of
Scientific Proof are Mike Lindell, Brannon Howse and Mary Fanning and was
filmed by WVW Broadcast Network, and directed by Brannon Howse.
To watch the one hour special Scientific Proof now, simply
go to lindelltv.com.
The online publication WND has been around a long time
founded in 1997. WND’s own press asserts it is the oldest online publication of
its kind.
With that said, I’m on the WND email alert list providing
timely news articles. This is how I discovered the unfortunate news the WND
founder Joseph Farah has suffered a stroke. Below are some brief details posted
on WND 3/28/19:
Recently,
adversity hit hard when our company’s founder and CEO, Joseph Farah, suffered a
serious stroke. After spending several days in the hospital undergoing
extensive testing and evaluation, he is now home, resting comfortably and
recovering.
Although
no one can say with certainty how long he will be away from WND, what I can say
with certainty is that Joseph and his family are extremely appreciative of your
prayers, as are all of us at WND.
Joseph’s
medical crisis, in addition to being a difficult trial for the Farah family, is
likewise tough for those of us staffing the news organization he founded and
has led for 22 years. I’ve known Joseph Farah for three decades, and for 20
years have worked closely with this pioneering journalist as a colleague, good
friend and fellow Christian. I know him as a man of enormous talents, integrity
and genuine faith.
For me, even more disturbing, the formerly great Washington
Post recently published a hit piece against WND mere days after
Farah’s stroke was announced. It’s a sad day in the media industry when a media
giant rips into another media company whose founder has had a severe medical event.
But I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised since WaPo has
become one of the chief purveyors of Left-Wing Fake News.
David Kupelian writing for WND chastises WaPo and provides
reassurances about WND’s intentions to keep providing Conservative news with a Christian
and pro-Israel slant.
Just five days after WND went public with the news that its
founder, editor and CEO, veteran journalist Joseph Farah had suffered a devastating
stroke, the Washington Post has published a lengthy article
attacking Farah, his wife Elizabeth, and WND, America’s first online journalism
organization.
The story, sensationally headlined “Inside the spectacular
fall of the granddaddy of right-wing conspiracy sites,” cites mostly unnamed
former employees and others. The Post also mysteriously managed to get a hold
of the contents of WND’s private email server, referencing and picking apart
numerous internal emails going as far back as 12 years.
So, what does the Washington Post story actually allege?
Against a backdrop of ongoing financial struggles at the
company, the article rolls out numerous examples of unpaid bills, unhappy
authors, supposedly bad judgment, failure to adequately communicate with board
members, and “reckless and undisciplined” spending by the company’s founders.
Evidently the Post considers it shocking and newsworthy that
over its 22-year history, a small, influential though undercapitalized company
in a highly competitive business, rocked regularly by seismic changes – the
dot-com crash, the Google-Facebook-Amazon disruption of the internet and so on
– might experience its share of failures, difficulties and embarrassments.
Nowhere in the Post’s article is anything remotely illegal
alleged. More to the point, nor does the Post acknowledge the important and
highly regarded reporting generated day in and day out, year after year, by
WND’s journalists – most of whom, remarkably, have been with WND for virtually
all of its two decades of existence.
Most interestingly, nowhere in his massive 2,700-word
article does Post reporter Manuel Roig-Franzia ever get down to what has
actually caused the precipitous drop in annual revenue at WND
over the last couple of years, which has led to the company’s current
struggles.
Seeing as Bezos is the world’s wealthiest human being, the
Post fortunately suffers no financial problems like WND and others do.
But there’s more: Besides Amazon, other internet
mega-monopolies including Google and Facebook have all but destroyed the other
major revenue stream for online news: advertising.
These developments on the internet – along with the now
well-documented progressive-left bias, censorship, skewed search algorithms,
demonetizing, shadow-banning, outright banning and multiple other modes of
suppressing non-leftwing thought – have severely impacted many independent
journalism organizations, including WND.
There is so much in the Post’s article that is unfair,
misleading and just wrong. But rather than refute every allegation and innuendo
in this one-sided, unsympathetic portrayal of a vastly smaller but influential
news competitor, maybe it’s fair game – since the Post casts aspersions not
just on the actions, but the motivations, of WND co-founders Joseph and
Elizabeth Farah – to examine the Post’s own motivations and agenda.
The Washington Post was once a great newspaper (I grew up in
Washington and the Post was delivered to our door daily), best known for its
fabled Watergate coverage, with Woodward and Bernstein inspiring a generation
of young people to follow in their journalistic footsteps – including Joseph
Farah. Those days are long gone. Critics today refer to the Washington Post as
“Jeff Bezos’ vanity paper,” the Amazon founder’s chief lobbying-propaganda arm
in the nation’s capital.
For the past two-plus years, the Post has been in the
forefront of the fake news coverage of the phony Trump-Russia-collusion hoax.
Let’s be clear: Month after month after month, the Washington Post feverishly
promoted the worst hoax in American history.
Enough said. As Tucker Carlson puts it, “The Washington Post
is not a serious newspaper. It’s a joke.”
Although Joseph Farah is the only person situated to respond
to many of the Post’s allegations, the paper chose to publish its takedown
article right after Farah suffered a major stroke rendering him totally unable
to defend himself, his wife and his news organization.
I don’t know why the Post chose to do such a thing. But I’ll
close by simply saying for the record, as WND’s vice president and managing
editor for 20 years, that I have nothing but the highest respect and love for
this amazing news organization, for its founders Joseph and Elizabeth Farah,
and for the dedicated journalists who work here.
Finally, regarding that Post headline gloating over “the
spectacular fall” of WND: To paraphrase Mark Twain, “Reports of our death have
been greatly exaggerated.” WND is still here. And we’re committed to doing what
we’ve been doing since before Amazon, Google, Facebook and others even existed
– to boldly report without fear or favor on all the corruption, lies, fraud,
abuse, attacks on the Constitution, and outright delusions that increasingly
dominate our great country. As the 2020 election nears, count on us to focus on
underreported but life-and-death issues like voter fraud in all its forms, the
left’s disastrous and flat-out insane agenda, Big Tech’s intended election
rigging and much more – oh yes, and exposing fake news.
NOTE: If you would like to support WND, you can do so
either directly at the Support WND Donation
page, or by making a tax-deductible donation to the newly
formed 501c3 nonprofit WND News Center. Thank
you.
WND, formerly WorldNetDaily, can best be explained by its
mission statement: “WND is an independent news company dedicated to
uncompromising journalism, seeking truth and justice and revitalizing the role
of the free press as a guardian of liberty. We remain faithful to the
traditional and central role of a free press in a free society – as a light
exposing wrongdoing, corruption and abuse of power.
“We also seek to stimulate a free-and-open debate about
the great moral and political ideas facing the world and to promote freedom and
self-government by encouraging personal virtue and good character.”
Indeed, WND is a fiercely independent news site committed
to hard-hitting investigative reporting of government waste, fraud and abuse.
Founded by Joseph and Elizabeth Farah in May 1997, it is
now a leading Internet news site in both traffic and influence.
WND has broken some of the biggest, most significant and
most notable investigative and enterprising stories in recent years. See “WND
Scoops” for a comprehensive list of major WND exclusive reports that first saw
the light of day in these pages.
WND’s unique and aggressive reporting style has captured
a large and growing audience on the Internet:
WND was voted the most popular website on the Internet
every week for nearly two years running between 1999 and 2001 on the
independent, European-based Global100.com.
WND consistently ranks as the “stickiest” news site on
the Internet, meaning readers spent more time on it than on any other –
including giants CNN, MSNBC and ESPN.
WND often ranks at the top of the news pack in … READ THE REST
Warner’s 10/27/17 email has an October 10 teaching moment
link; however, the email is more focused on censorship conducted by the Left
because that portion of the political spectrum believes exposing Islam is a
hate-action described by the epithet Islamophobia.
“irrational fear of, aversion
to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam”
Is it irrational to expose the reasoning of a Muslim who is
merely following the bloody example of Islam’s founder the (pseudo)prophet
Muhammad (Mohammed)? Muslims are taught from birth that Muhammad is the perfect
and should be emulated. The reality – gleaned from Islamic revered writings –
Muhammad was a bloodthirsty killer of all who refused him, who had a special
hatred for polytheists followed closely by Jews and Christians, he raped women,
turned women into sex-slaves, extorted non-Muslims with a fake-protection tax,
forced non-Muslims to live a dog-of-a-subservient life and that is relatively
the tip of the iceberg of this so-called perfect man.
Telling that truth, labels me a racist Islamophobe by
the Left and Muslim apologist. Bill Warner in introducing one his past videos,
provides an excellent yet short reality about the term Leftists and Muslims use
for racism:
And this returns me to Bill Warner exposing Leftist censorship
that is getting Counterjihadists banned and demonetized because they dare to
expose Islam or some anti-Conservative value of the Left.
So this how I am going to handle the Warner email. I will
cross post the text of the email less the links to videos and to the PragerU
link because I am posting those separately from the email.
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) publishes a hit list
of “Islamophobes.” This list is the fuel behind Silicon Valley’s economic
warfare against critics of Islam and conservative voices in general.
In the video, “The ‘Anti-Hate’ Group
That Is a Hate Group”, Prager U exposes the true nature of the
SPLC. It is important to understand this powerful and dangerous near enemy.
The censorship attack on our free speech by Silicon Valley
billionaires is economic warfare, designed to cause a famine by taking myself
and others out of the marketplace of ideas. There is a near enemy, dhimmi
apologists for Islam, and a far enemy, political Islam. The actual work of
attacking our civilization is being done by the near enemy. We need new allies
to avoid a devastating future.
Good News
PragerU is suing
Sharia-compliant Youtube and Google over our constitutional right
to free speech. PragerU is doing work for the benefit of us all, and they
use your support. The
fight to maintain our 1st, and most important, Amendment rights will be a long
and costly one.
We have two enemies in our struggles– the near enemy
apologists for Sharia and the far enemy, Islam. The Silicon Valley billionaires
now support Sharia by censoring its critics.
The Southern Poverty Law Center bills itself as a watchdog
of hate groups. But is this just a cover for its true aims? Journalist and
author Karl Zinsmeister explains.
Shutting down people you don’t agree with is about as
un-American as you can get.
Rigorous debate, honest discussion, open exchange of
ideas—that’s the American way.
But free thinking and speech are threatened today by a group
with a sweet-sounding name that conceals a nefarious purpose. This group is
called the Southern Poverty Law Center, or SPLC.
Originally founded as a civil-rights law firm in 1971, the
SPLC reinvented itself in the mid-‘80s as a political attack group. Every year
now it produces a new list of people and charities it claims are “extremists”
and “haters.”
Aided by glowing coverage from the establishment media, the
SPLC’s hate list has become a weapon for taking individuals and groups they
disagree with and tarring them with ugly associations.
The SPLC employs a two-pronged strategy:
First, find a handful of crazies with barely any followers,
no address, and no staff, and blow them up into a dangerous movement— proof
that there are neo-Nazis lurking everywhere. On their notorious “Hate Map,” the
SPLC lists 917 separate hate groups in the U.S.! No one has even heard of more than
a handful of them.
The second strategy of the SPLC is to undermine legitimate
political voices that they oppose by associating them with extremists like the
KKK.
Take the charity known as the Alliance Defending Freedom.
The SPLC lists them as a “hate group.” Is that fair? Well, the ADF has a
network of 3,000 attorneys from all across the U.S. who’ve donated more than a
million volunteer hours in defense of religious liberty. They’ve had a role in
49 victories at the U.S. Supreme Court. Putting the Alliance Defending Freedom
on a list with 130 Ku Klux Klan chapters is not only wrong, it’s malicious.
According to the SPLC, one of the most influential social
scientists in the U.S.— Charles Murray—is a, quote, “white nationalist.” Ayaan
Hirsi Ali, perhaps the most eloquent spokesperson for the rights of Muslim
women, is, to the SPLC, a “toxic... anti-Muslim extremist.”
Scores of other individuals and charities active in
mainstream conservative or religious causes have likewise been branded by the
Southern Poverty Law Center as threats to society.
Mind you, it is entirely fair to disagree with any of those
folks. But it is utterly unfair to call them haters or extremists. The largest
category listed by the SPLC as extremists—with 623 entries—covers groups like
the Tea Party organizations that are wary of centralized government. Last time
we checked, favoring smaller government was a mainstream and perfectly
honorable American tradition.
What is not honorable is the course prescribed by a leader
of the SPLC, Mark Potok, who was caught on video proclaiming the organization’s
true intentions. He told a group of supporters, quote, “the press will describe
us as ‘monitoring hate groups’….
I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, to completely
destroy them.”
Portraying someone with political views different from your
own as a public menace is bullying.
And it’s a dangerous game. Instead of reducing hate and
violence, the SPLC’s name-calling directly incites it.
In March 2017, Charles Murray was trying to discuss his
acclaimed book Coming Apart at Middlebury College when he was violently
attacked by protesters inflamed by the SPLC’s labeling of him as a racist. A
professor escorting Murray ended up in the hospital.
“This is speech discrimination
plain and simple, censorship based entirely on unspecified ideological
objection to the message or on the perceived identity and political viewpoint
of the speaker” - 36th Governor of California Pete Wilson
Browne, George, Ross LLP
LOS ANGELES — Prager University (PragerU) has filed a
lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California to stop Google and YouTube from unlawfully censoring its educational
videos and discriminating against its right to freedom of speech.
The lawsuit cites more than 50 PragerU videos which have
either been “restricted” or “demonetized” by Google/YouTube. The PragerU videos
range on various subjects presenting a conservative point of view, and include
a video by noted Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz on the founding of Israel.
PragerU previously compiled a complete list of their restricted videos here, which includes: “Why
America Must Lead,” “The Ten Commandments: Do Not Murder,” “Why Did America
Fight the Korean War,” and “The World’s Most Persecuted Minority:
Christians.”
In correspondence cited in the filing, Google/YouTube made
it clear that the censorship of certain videos was because they were deemed
“inappropriate” for younger audiences.
“Watch any one of our videos and you’ll immediately realize
that Google/YouTube censorship is entirely ideologically driven. For the
record, our videos are presented by some of the finest minds in the Western
world, including four Pulitzer Prize winners, former prime ministers, and
professors from the most prestigious universities in America,” stated PragerU
founder Dennis Prager.
Prager added, “They are engaging in an arbitrary and
capricious use of their ‘restricted mode’ and ‘demonetization’ to restrict
non-left political thought. Their censorship is profoundly damaging because
Google and YouTube own and control the largest forum for public participation
in video-based speech in not only California, but the United States, and the
world.”
The total number of people who currently use YouTube exceeds
1.3 billion people. Google and YouTube advertise YouTube to the public as a
forum intended to defend and protect free speech where members of the general
public may express and exchange their ideas. They have represented that their
platforms and services are intended to effectuate the exercise of free speech
among the public. According to Google and YouTube: “voices matter.” YouTube
states that it is “committed to fostering a community where everyone’s voice
can be heard.”
“However,” said Eric George of Browne George Ross, the firm
representing PragerU, “Google and YouTube use restricted mode filtering not to
protect younger or sensitive viewers from ‘inappropriate’ video content, but as
a political gag mechanism to silence PragerU. Google and YouTube do this not
because they have identified video content that violates their guidelines or is
otherwise inappropriate for younger viewers, but because PragerU is a
conservative nonprofit organization that is associated with and espouses the
views of leading conservative speakers and scholars.”
“This is speech discrimination plain and simple, censorship
based entirely on unspecified ideological objection to the message or on the
perceived identity and political viewpoint of the speaker,” said former
California Governor Pete Wilson of Browne George Ross. “Google and YouTube’s
use of restricted mode filtering to silence PragerU violates its fundamental
First Amendment rights under both the California and United States
Constitutions. It constitutes unlawful discrimination under California law, is
a misleading and unfair business practice, and breaches the warranty of good
faith and fair dealing implied in Google and YouTube’s own Terms of Use and
'Community Guidelines.'”
“There is absolutely nothing ‘inappropriate’ about the
content of the PragerU videos censored by Google and YouTube; the videos do not
contain any profanity, nudity or otherwise inappropriate ‘mature’ content and
they fully comply with the letter of YouTube’s Terms of Use and Community
Guidelines,” said Marissa Streit, PragerU’s chief executive officer who has
engaged in a year-long-effort to try and persuade Google to stop censoring
PragerU content. Streit continues, “It's clear that someone doesn’t like what
we teach and so they intend on stopping us from teaching it. Can you imagine
what the world would look like if Google is allowed to continue to arbitrarily
censor ideas they simply don’t agree with?”
“This is not a left/right issue. It is a free speech issue,
which is why prominent liberals, such as Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz,
are supporting our lawsuit,” Prager concluded.
The lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California is
available here.
###
Advisory Legal Council:
Former Governor Pete Wilson’s Law Firm, Browne, George and Ross; Eric George; Alan Dershowitz; Barak Lurie, Kelly Shackelford, Mat Staver; and
additional prominent attorneys.
PragerU, founded by Dennis Prager in 2011, is a
not-for-profit organization that helps millions understand the values that
shaped America and provides millions of Americans and people around the world
with the intellectual ammunition they need to advocate for limited government,
individual responsibility and economic freedom. In 2016 alone, PragerU’s videos
received over 250 million views, a figure that will eclipse 350 million in
2017. PragerU is a resource for all who value liberty. It is a threat to all
those who do not.
Islam has many strengths that
we need to learn from. For instance, Islam’s concept of civilizational war has
no equal in the West. Muslims use a hijab as a weapon, for instance. Muslims
have a perpetual optimism about winning. Muslims want to win; we want to tie.
Muslims naturally form groups to advance their cause. They are a powerful
political lobbying group.
We need to learn from Islam’s
strengths so that we don’t lose.
Islam is a cultural,
religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest tokafirs(non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated.
The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran,
theHadith(the traditions of
Mohammed) and his biography, theSira.
CSPI
Center for the Study
of Political Islam (CSPI) is an educational organization dedicated to
enlightening the general public about the doctrine of political Islam based on
the works of Dr. Bill Warner.
Our Mission
Political Islam has
subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the
world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and
his god, Allah.
The Five Principles
Islam’s Trilogy of
three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When
the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and …READ THE REST
_________________
The "Anti-Hate" Group That Is a Hate Group
Prager University
(PragerU) Takes Legal Action Against Google and YouTube for Discrimination
PRAGER UNIVERSITY IS
NOT AN ACCREDITED ACADEMIC INSTITUTION AND DOES NOT OFFER CERTIFICATIONS OR
DIPLOMAS. BUT IT IS A PLACE WHERE YOU ARE FREE TO LEARN.
The greatest threat
to America is that most Americans don’t know what makes America great.
PragerU's mission is to explain and spread what we call “Americanism” through
the power of the Internet. Our five-minute videos are conservative sound bites
that clarify profoundly significant and uniquely American concepts for more
than 100 million people each year.
Our Vision
We help millions of
people understand the fundamental values that shaped America, and provide them
with the intellectual ammunition they need to defend and spread those values.
PragerU is a resource for every American—and every person in the world who
values liberty—for understanding and explaining the values we share.
About Us
We take the best
ideas from the best minds and distill them down to five focused minutes. We
then add graphics and animation to create the most persuasive, entertaining,
and educational case possible for the values that have made America and the
West the source of so much liberty and wealth. These values are Judeo-Christian
at their core and include the concepts of freedom of speech, a free press, free
markets and a strong military to protect and project those values.
