I found this very short
video of JP Sears mocking gun control (cough– transgender terrorism
against Christians the unspoken backstory) on Telegram. I wish I could
remember from where to give proper credit but I can’t recall. I notice the
original video format is Tik Tok. I for one avoid Tik Tok due to its essential
ownership by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The CCP is enemy of all Freedom
loving people world-wide but especially the enemy of the American Principles of
Liberty that the Dem-Marxists are doing their damnedest to terminate.
AT ANY RATE, this JP Sear 3-minute short is full of truth,
the humor amplifies the right of self-protection and the hints of past
genocides resulting from gun-confiscation.
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip
in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated.
PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store
(please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Blog Editor: Rather than
capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post
and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship
tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false
accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat
censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you
belong to.
Many Conservatives who pay attention to how government and
politics affects their lives are aware of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. Those
same Conservatives are aware of prominent Dems living the Rules for Radicals (cough
ahem – Crooked Hillary, Deep State Obama, among others).
Alinsky’s Rules are a Socialist agenda to transform America
AWAY from its Founding Principles and Christian heritage. Take from the Ocensor
article cross posted here about how much the present Dem Agenda smacks of old
uncle Saul.
Many of us have heard of Saul Alinsky, his rules for
radicals, the left scoffs at our looking to this, but is there any truth that
this is being applied to the US political landscape today, and if it is, who is
applying it?
To understand what these rules are we have to look at what
he asked for and what was his goal. Alinsky was a socialist who lived in the
1900s in the US, graduated from the University of
Chicago with a Ph.D. in Psychology. He went on and worked for the
State of Illinois for a short time, then went on to be a community organizer,
writer, political activist.
He is looked to as an author of socialist ideology,
something that many on the left aspire to follow, and much of his “Rules for
Radicals,” published a year before his death is seen as a guideline of how to
bring about a social change in America to set it up for socialist rule.
So what is this “Rules for Radicals” and what did it
advocate? The whole document was set up to show how to bring a nation to its
knees so a socialist change could come to the land and would bring about
socialism to the state. Here are the items and what they were set up for:
1) Healthcare –
Control healthcare and you control the people.
2) Poverty –
Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to
control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to
live.
3) Debt– Increase the debt to an unsustainable
level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce
more poverty.
4) Gun Control –
Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are
able to create a police state.
5) Welfare –
Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Water, Electrical power,
Housing and neighborhood demographics, and Income).
6) Education –
Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children
learn in school. (Common Core?)
7) Religion –
Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare
– Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more
discontent and it will be easier to take Tax from the wealthy with the support
of the poor.
So how does this list apply today? I would say if you look
at the actions of the last president, then of the left today, with people like
AOC, Sanders, along with her squad and many from the left you see this in full
effect today. So let’s look at each item and see if it is in workings today.
·Healthcare – Control healthcare and you
control the people.
i.We saw two activists within the Democratic
party, one that was very much of an activist in her school days, one that went
from activist and community organizer to the White House, Clinton and Obama
pushed from their times in the White House to put in place socialized medical
care, Clinton failed when she was the first lady, Obama partially succeeded,
but has much of what he pushed now being stripped by Trump.
ii.Even though Trump has pushed back on this, today
you see the whole Democrat party pushing for universal healthcare, the more
left-leaning or outright socialist the candidates are, who is running for
president, we see idea’s being presented from strengthening of Obamacare to
outright shutting down private healthcare insurance and putting in a Canadian
style social healthcare, where the state controls all.
iii.We now hear that healthcare is a fundamental
human right, this is used as a means of pushing that there should be no choice
in this, the government, as a guarantor of our rights should be the one to take
charge of our health care, it should never be in the hands of private business
or individuals. The far-left socialist, Sanders and Warran are pushing this;
when asked if our healthcare insurance will be taken, both are equal in their moves
to deflect from the question and never answer.
iv.By demanding that universal healthcare is given
to all, including illegals, the left is demanding that our nation be changed to
what they demand, if you are not willing to change the structure of our government
the left labels and then attacks, as they do with everything.
·Poverty – with the way the economy is
going under Trump this is getting harder and harder to exploit, so instead of
trying to exploit poverty, instead the left pushes to scare people to think it
is coming, or to openly wish for a great recession, such as Bill Mahr did.
1.We have seen that some within the left want to
see a recession, turn to any paper, turn on the news, you are now bombarded
with stories of a recession coming our way. The fact that our economy is the
strongest it has been in years, that is a considerable inconvenience for the
left, they know then the only way to push this today is not to say people are
worse off, instead, bad times are coming, when they do, it is all Trump’s and
the Right’s fault, so you need to come to us today so we can protect you
against this when it happens.
2.The second thing you see is the left turning to
very radical ideas that will radically transform our economy and is guaranteed
to bring about complete and total poverty, thus you have the Green New Deal. When the left
is unable to feed off the fear of people of things turning sour, they then look
for ways to bring about an economic downturn. The dream of the left is to see
our economy fail, the benefit for them is two-fold: First, they get rid of the
arch-enemy who they see as standing in their way for the idea of a socialist
paradise. That would be the conservative right and Trump.
·Debt – Debt is not bad, but when it is
used to push a nation to the point of poverty, it is. We saw with Obama claims
that we needed more than one trillion dollar stimulus to bring back the economy
of the US, but the question has to be asked if this was supposed to help our
economy, why
then did Obama pass this on to businesses outside our nation and to other
countries?
i.One of the ways to bring people and nation to
poverty is to rack up their debt. We had two trillion dollar stimulus given to
Obama, but instead of our economy thriving, unemployment going down with this,
instead, our economy got worse, our unemployment figures continued to rise.
ii.Under Obama, we saw our deficit double, and one
has to ask, what was accomplished? Our growth never exceeded 2%, he told us
jobs were not coming back, he fell back on his socialist ideals when he
demanded that more and more of our lives and our dependence be given to the
state.
iii.While the debt is growing under Trump, and I
would love to see a reverse of this, we also have to understand, with all these
trillions that Obama was given, our national defense was left in shatters,
Trump had little choice but to pick up the budget just to build back up a
tattered force, many of our jets were unable to fly, it
got so bad the Navy was raiding museums to get spare parts. Trump’s
moves were never to set this nation in debt; he is moving to pick up the
economy to cover spending, an increase in the economy means there are more
funds available to be taxed.
·Take Away Our 2nd Amendment – no party
has done more to try to restrict our right to bear arms, something that is part
of the American fabric in life, it is a right granted to all Americans,
although I now see this right slowly being stripped frequently on almost a
daily basis. The left knows a well-armed population is not so quickly forced to
go with government programs and forced ideology, take away the guns you take
away the ability to resist.
i.While I can’t say for certain that these school
shootings are far too convenient, but I must ask if you are so concerned about
school shootings, why aren’t you willing to secure the schools that house our
children so this does not happen? As terrible as this sounds, I am at the point
that I believe the left thinks these children being lost are worth the
sacrifice if they can take our guns in the end. That is why the left refuses to
act to protect our schools if we do that, then they will see no more shootings
to use as a backdrop to press their taking of our guns.
·Welfare – no place is the dependence the
left wants on display than in our inner cities. The grand experiment by Johnson
has laid our cities to waste; families are not in multiple generations where
not a soul has worked, their dependence of the state is total. When you create
a whole class that is dependent on the state, you have an almost entire class
of people who are easily controlled.
i.The inner cities in America, parts that are
where the primary population of our African American demographic lives, you
have a whole group that is told they need to vote as they are told, it is best
for them, even though little can be shown to back this up.
ii.Today the growth of African American’s leaving
the Democratic party is quickly bringing the far left to the point of panic, so
what did they do? They moved on from these people, still demand that they
support them, all while turning on them and moving their support for illegals
that have no say in government affairs. This is why there is such a strong move
now to give illegals the right to vote.
·Education – the plan here was to use our
school’s as a means not to teach, instead, indoctrinate. I must say, no place
is it evident that this is being applied in America today than in our whole
mess of an education system. We send our children to school to get an education
so they can better their lives, yet starting now in grade schools are children
are under a constant barrage of liberal ideology.
i.No place are these ideas in its entirety shown
more than in schools. You have young people that are poor, they are going
through school, so the concept of social handouts is very appealing to them,
they care not about taxes, they aren’t paying any, instead they are living off
the graces of the taxpayer, thus they feel in many cases they are entitled to
these handouts.
ii.We also see the lack of freedom of speech, of
different ideas, this is something these young people think is unacceptable.
Thus you have riots and using the heckler’s veto when they wish to shut up
opposing views. As was with Russia in their revolution, China too, the leaders
or activist go for the youth, they are less able to see what this will lead to
in the future, only care about the present.
·Religion – Religion or faith, it gives
hope to a people, that is why socialism, in every nation it has been
implemented in, religion was either controlled by the state or was stomped out,
or at least the effort was to do this. If you have a people without hope, they
need to look to someone or something for hope; if you put the government in
place to give this hope, they will turn to it.
i.The colleges, the stronghold of this movement
are also moving to push this. If you look at the teachings of evolution, global
warming, you don’t see a science, where all can be questioned, it is OK to
challenge theories to see if they stand up to the questions presented. Instead,
you are attacked by zealots, with every bit as much zeal as you see from other
faiths when you question their core doctrines. The left has moved to replace
religion with science, they seem to fail to understand, they are two separate
things, but when you do this, you still accomplish what you were seeking to do,
taking away hope outside of what socialist is trying to present.
·Class Warfare – To control the masses, as
was seen in Germany, Russia, China, and other nations, you need to create an
enemy, for the socialist, it is the elites, the ones driving the economy. They
push that somehow these people are gifted, they have earned nothing, gotten
what they have due to their taking it from the less fortunate, but is this the
case? Let’s look at that:
i.We have heard it said that people with too much
money should be forced to hand it over to people that have little or none, this
is the groundwork of socialism, but is really good practice. You have Bill
Gates, Zuckerberg, and others, tech giants that have amassed unheard-of wealth,
but did they steal? No, they created a product, one that had a need, they used
this need to create wealth, no one was stolen from, people paid for this, this
was passed on to these people that created these items.
ii.Socialist countries start off by stripping the
wealthy of their wealth, this may seem like a good thing, but when this is the
class creating jobs, handing down wealth to people under them due to this
creation, what happens to jobs when they are taken out of the equation? Suggest
you look to Venezuela and see what happens. A large oil producer, a wealthy
nation, but the standards of the nations around it, now is in utter poverty,
the people are in the streets looking for some means of survival. All they have
done is stopped upwards mobility and made all people poor.
We are all in a big chest match, pieces are being moved,
many times not in a way that we suspect, but the results will be the same,
either we move to counter this or sit and watch it happen.
I find it understandable Americans are upset that mass
shootings can seemingly occur one incident after another and another. But What
most of those upset Americans do not understand is gun control laws whether
they be gun confiscation, Red Flag Laws, Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO)
or whatever else restrains the Founding Fathers’ intent for
ratifying the Second Amendment; will
eventually lead to the tyranny of the Elite.
Justin Smith addresses the alarming utilization of government
power that restrains law abiding citizens more than law-breaking criminals.
Eroding Liberty - Unconstitutional: Red Flags & Gun Bans
By Justin O. Smith
Sent 8/11/2019 7:00
PM
Americans are rushing towards tyranny more frequently these
days, in the wake of three recent mass shootings, and they are calling for
unconstitutional and illegitimate new laws that penalize honest and decent
Americans in an unconscionable manner, while doing little in the way of
creating real solutions. If anyone believes red flag laws, expanded background checks
and bans on semi-automatic weapons will make them safer, they are so sadly
mistaken, and, if enacted, not only will they not be any safer, they will be
less free, with their God given rights further eroded and
suppressed.
Every law-abiding U.S. citizen should be up-in-arms and in
an uproar over President Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and
others, such as key Republicans like Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC), Sen. Pat Toomey
(PA), Sen. Marco Rubio (FL) and Sen. John Cornyn (TX) pursuing new gun control
legislation and "compromises" with Democrats, such as Senator Dianne
Feinstein (CA), Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT) and
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (CA), especially when any real compromise doesn't exist,
and never will. Even as Republicans showed their willingness to enact stronger
background checks and red flag laws, Democrats were screaming for stores, like
Walmart, to stop selling ammo and guns and for laws that invoke higher taxes on
both, as well as a law banning semi-automatic rifles; Republicans are becoming
willing accomplices in the Democrat goal of eradicating the Second
Amendment.
Despite his bluster and tough talk as a strong defender of
the Second Amendment, President Trump is not to be trusted on this issue, since
he has a long standing known propensity for gun control, favoring gun bans as
late as 2009, and as President, Donald Trump has already violated the Second
Amendment through his Executive Order that authorized the Department of Justice
to regulate bumpstocks, which also flies in the face of D.C. vs Heller, in which
the Court acknowledged that an individual has the right to keep and bear arms
of the same sophistication and technological advancement of the U.S. military,
since the Second Amendment was written as a measure to ensure U.S. citizens'
rights to arm themselves against any tyrannical government, not to hunt
deer.
With McDonald vs Chicago, the Court ruled that the Second
Amendment was "incorporated". This legal term placed states and local
governments on notice that they must follow the limitations of the
Constitution's 2nd Amendment and could not make laws more restrictive than
allowed by the 2nd Amendment, which states "the right of the people to
keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
And now, most recently, all America heard President Trump state, "I have called for
Red Flag Laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders."
Regarding background checks, he stated on August 9th, that he thinks "Republicans are
going to be great and lead the charge along with Democrats.”
One should also note that although President Trump once
suggested foregoing "due process" after the Parkland High School mass
shooting in February 2018, he did state on August 5th
2019, that "those judged to pose a great risk to public safety (should)
not have access to firearms and if they do, those firearms can be taken through
rapid due process."
On August 8th, Senator McConnell told NPR that the Senate would be
addressing bans on "assault weapons" and expanded background
checks, when the Senate reconvenes in September. McConnell's use of the term
"assault weapons" is part of the Democratic Party narrative that
seeks to negate the true and legal use of these weapons for self-defense, and
it only serves to further erode the Bill of Rights and our liberty if we allow
it to go unanswered.
Nobody in America wants to see anyone who is mentally
unstable enough to commit violence having a powerful firearm in their hands,
but there already exist numerous laws, that if properly enforced would
alleviate that problem. Peddling his staunch "defender" title in
2015, even President Trump noted: "Too many states
are failing to put criminal and mental health records into the system (making
the system ineffective). ... fix the system we have and make it work as
intended ... don't ... expand a broken system."
However, unconstitutional Red Flag Laws are not the
answer, especially once one considers the many government abuses that have
already occurred in the seventeen states (and the
District of Columbia) that have legislated Red Flag Laws. They allow police to
convene a Chekist-style secret meeting, that strips an American of his Second,
Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights and violates "due process of the
law", since the firearm owners are barred from participating in the
hearing and presenting their counter argument, and often, they are unaware of
the "Extreme Risk Protection Order"
[USACarry.com
and RomanoLawpc.com]
until the police knock on the door and ransack their house or arrest or
shoot them, just as they shot Gary Willis, in Baltimore, MD, at 5:17 a.m. on
November 5th 2018 for resisting their ERPO. [The
Epoch Times and New
American]
Willis was executed for resisting a government overreach,
intrusion and violation of his basic God given rights. I guess America could
have just skipped the bloodshed of the War for Independence, since so many now
seem to prefer authoritarian controls, serfdom and a King over freedom and
liberty.
Patrick McLaw
On August 22nd 2014, Patrick
McLaw, a 23 year old middle school teacher -- once nominated for Teacher of
the Year [Last
Paragraph], was taken into police custody for a psychological evaluation,
after he wrote two novels about high
school massacres, under the pen name "Dr. K.S. Voltaer". McLaw had no
criminal record, no guns or bombs were found in his home, but the State
Attorney claimed McLaw drew police attention through a four page letter he sent to officials in Dorchester County.
And in the end, no warrant was issued, no charges were filed and no arrest was
made, however, he remained detained in police custody, while they investigated
crimes he may or may not have committed, as the State utilized psychopathological
mechanisms, the touchstone of totalitarian governments, and fully displayed the
great distance our society has drifted from liberty.
Dave Workman, senior editor at the Second Amendment
Foundation in Bellevue, Washington recently wrote: "It's (Extreme Risk
Protection Order) a great idea on paper. In practice, however, you're guilty
until you prove yourself innocent."
A Red Flag Law in Tennessee might even scoop me up, since in
my youth, I used to have a hair-trigger temper, cracked many a ridge-runnin'
redneck's jaw and quite possibly should have been charged with assault myself,
at one time or another in my life. No excuses made from me; I am a strictly no
nonsense man who never took being called out of my name or having hands placed
on me in anger lightly, and in every case where the law ever questioned me, the
attending officer agreed with me, for whatever the reason. However, some past
recipients of my wrath would certainly be quick to turn such a law against me,
even though I am a much cooler head today, years later.
But, having a pistol or rifle in my hands always leveled my
thinking, whenever I encountered danger and imminent harm, having traveled the
most dangerous areas of America, at one time or another. It tamped down any
anger, since I have always been all too cognizant of the power of firearms and
the damage they can do, my entire life; and, due to my respect for all life, I
never wanted to take another person's life, if there was anyway to avoid doing
so.
I've had a firearm of one type or another in my hands, since
I was eight years old, when my father first started teaching me firearm safety,
and I received more instruction in the 6th grade at a summer camp at Columbia
Military Academy (Columbia, TN), where all the children were handed .22 caliber
semi-automatic rifles, in 1969, for a well supervised target practice; and of
course, I received further instruction upon joining the U.S. Army years later. Good
people raising good children will make for a safer society. Teach your children
well, starting with the Ten Commandments, or a similar moral code.
If more gun laws worked, Mexico wouldn't have had 100,000
people killed by firearms in the past decade. It has the most restrictive gun
laws one might imagine, and it has only one gun store, that sits in the middle
of a military base and has soldiers for clerks. Restrictions on the good and
decent citizens, whether in Mexico or America, only favors the criminals.
There is also a much more serious issue at hand: If the
Constitution can be suspended in a secret hearing, this can only lead to a
despotic government and great tyranny. The Democrats have already proposed the
forced confiscation of the American people's firearms and weapons by armed
squads of police.
What if this publication could be shut down without due
process, based on a secret complaint? Or individuals could now be arrested or
imprisoned for 21 days, or more? How far off can torture be? Eroding the
Second Amendment in this manner erodes the entire Bill of Rights.
Any American who values our rule of law and the Bill of
Rights and the inalienable rights that preexist politics and government should
be opposing all the new gun control measures coming our way, as we work to keep
the legal and justified means of self-defense in the hands of all law-abiding
citizens, since not one state law in this respect is constitutional, and a
federal law would not be either. Taking away rights from law-abiding citizens
due to terrible acts by criminals, a small percentage of the population, is
precisely what our Constitutional Republic was designed to protect against and
expressly forbids. The legal philosophy behind these laws is dangerously
illegitimate, and far from bipartisan or consensus proposals, they represent a
constitutional Rubicon and the point of no return.
Y'all can give up your semi-automatic weapons if you're of a
mind to do so. As for me, they'll have to pry them from my cold, dead hands.
By Justin O. Smith
___________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets and all source links are by the
Editor.
While browsing the Facebook Group TheAmericanPatriotsParty I
found an awesome essay criticizing the Leftist Gun Control media taking
advantage of the Parkland Massacre. It is an awesome read! I couldn’t help
myself, I added some source links the author would have difficulty in posting
at Facebook.
In the WACKY WORLD OF THE LUNATIC LEFT they once again
politicize a shooting tragedy. They never let an opportunity pass to push their
GUN CONTROL AGENDA. Nothing has changed. It’s the lunatics with the same
strategy. This is the hot topic of the day. There are calls for something to be
done. The arming of teachers is being proposed by our President. That is what
we hear him say but many find that utterly abhorrent.
What we are seeing by the Democrats is their perfection of the
art of using sympathetic figures to argue for positions that millions of us
reject. When we disagree, we are accused of mean-spiritedness. This is hardly
surprising what else would you expect?? Studies show that assault
rifles are rarely used in these horrific crimes, but calls are being made for
them to be banned. Weapon confiscation is the desire of the Left. It is this
that we must fully understand.
In a city like Chicago we have the toughest gun laws
on the books but gun violence increases [Blog Editor: Chicago Gun
violence was highest in nation in 2016. Gun violence actually decreased in
2017, BUT not because of strict gun laws as Leftists claim. Rather the decrease
is credited to police use of better technology. STILL, Chicago gun
violence higher than LA and NYC combined in 2017.]. It is not on the
wane. The Left refuses to realize this. Need I have to explain that their
endless machinations just never, ever ceases? It is frankly quite insane. And
speaking of insanity let me direct you to a town hall forum that was organized by CNN[Blog Editor: HS Junior Colton
Haag says CNN scripted, CNN says no. Colton had the altered question on Tucker Carlson Tonight. We ALL
know CNN lies.], the number one purveyor of FAKERY. This is the station
dedicated to show you that there is nothing they won’t do to prove how
miserable they can be.
Of course, we saw how they tried to plant scripted
questions. Ask a shooting survivor who refused to take part. The bias that
consumes CNN is off the chart. This is a most serious matter. But nothing is
out of bounds when you have fake journalists like Wolf Blitzer and that lowlife
dirt bag, Jake Tapper. Throw Anderson Cooper in the mix and you have quite a
wretched threesome. Their adoration for the disgusting ideology of the Left and
it’s pushing for gun control can leave you numb.
What we saw on CNN is being said was an abusive, anti-gun
show trial. It was criticized severely and was in fact very vile. The agenda,
always the agenda, is pushed. It is repugnant to see. There is no one on the
Left that has a smidgen of decency. The survivors of the shooting are in an
extreme emotional state. See them being used by the gun control advocates so
shamelessly. It is enough to make you totally sick. From Someone pass me a barf
bag I must regurgitate.
That was an abomination we saw last night[Ben Shapiro Show devoted to CNN Town
Hall abomination]. The criticism of Tapper was truly justified. How
silent this scumbag was when personal attacks were hurled at an NRA spokesman
and Senator Rubio. What the hell was wrong with him?? His silence remained even
after the audience booed a rape victim! Tapper no doubt approved what was going
on that was apparent to see. He never ever misses an opportunity to disgust me.
A CPAC panel got it so right in
describing the event. They called it for what it truly was. A TROTSKYITE SHOW
TRIAL AGAINST THE SECOND AMENDMENT. CNN never disappoints us. It is a truly a
disgusting entity that basks in it repugnancy.
_______________
Edited by John R. Houk
All source links as well as text
embraced by brackets are by the Editor.
Understanding Justin Smith’s essay, you have to understand
the nature of Unalienable Rights:
Unalienable rights are
those which God gave to man at the Creation, once and for all. By
definition, since God granted such rights, governments could not take them
away. In America, this fundamental truth
is recognized and enshrined in our nation's birth certificate, the Declaration
of Independence:
"[A]ll men are created
equal...[and] are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
It is important to understand that
the very premise of our nation is the fact that these rights are "God-given." If they are
not given to us by an Authority higher than human government, then any government
action to abolish those rights would be against God's will. Rights that is
subject to government restriction or license is called a privilege rather than a
right. The Founding
Fathers understood this principle and created a revolution in political theory by enacting, for the first time in history, a government specifically established to protect
the rights that had been given to man by God. … (Unalienable rights; Conservapedia; page was last modified on 5/27/2016,
at 14:52.)
The Founding Fathers considered self-defense an Unalienable
Right and NOT a government given privilege. In the Founding Fathers’ wisdom,
the Second Amendment is recognition of a God-given Right.
President Obama and U.S. Senators such as Chris Murphy
(D-CT) are intellectually challenged in ascertaining the limits of their
authority, when in the face of the worst act of domestic terrorism in decades,
on June 12th in Orlando, FL, they divert time and resources from the real
threat of Islam inspired terrorism to advocate, filibuster and place legislation
for a vote designed to infringe upon, limit and impede the
"unalienable" right to "keep and bear arms" under the
Second Amendment. And in the process, they have placed the 4th, 5th and 6th
Amendments on the chopping block too.
Barely a day had passed, and with 49 Americans lying dead in
the morgue and many more in Orlando regional Medical Center's critical care
unit fighting to stay alive, President Obama stated: "We have to make it
harder for people who want to kill Americans to get their hands on weapons of
war that let them kill dozens of innocents."
"Weapons of War"? Damn Straight. Any firearm is a
weapon of war and it is good for only one thing -- killing; killing the robber,
crazed drug addict, rapist or murderer breaking into one's house, as innocent
Americans fight a war on crime; and killing anyone, including a Muslim
terrorist, on the street in defense of one's self or a group of innocent
bystanders. Even a single-shot revolver or a single-shot bolt action 30.06 can
be "a weapon of war", but more than that, whether a semi-automatic
Sig Sauer CMX or a single-shot muzzle-loader, these are weapons for
self-defense.
Obama and company have taken this crisis -- this tragic,
horrific act of Islamic terrorism -- and twisted it towards their oppressive
goals to place every principle of the Bill of Rights and every invaluable and
most sacred privilege of man at the mercy of government. Self-defense is our
"unalienable" right as witnessed in Nature's Law, which is God's
Creation, and thus, our unalienable rights are God-given.
Rather than focus on the Muslim Students Association, an arm
of the terroristic Muslim Brotherhood, which is busy on all of America's
college campuses advocating "grand jihad" against America, and
unindicted terrorists like Siraj Wahhaj -- a black Muslim
convert, and indicted terrorists such as Ramadan Shalah -- still fleeing
the FBI, the Democrats are assaulting the Constitution's Bill of Rights. Rather
than focus on mosques that spread anti-American, violent propaganda, like the
Darul Uloom Institute [DTN info on founder Maulana Shafayat
Mohamed] and the Husseini Islamic Center [Gay-hatingSheikh
Dr. Farrokh Sekaleshfar spoke there], Democrats and Hillary
Clinton would destroy our right to self-defense, as they echo Obama's words.
A few weeks prior to Omar Mateen committing mass murder at
Pulse Night Club, the Husseini Islamic Center of Orlando hosted an imam who preached that "gays must die", according
to Michelle Malkin on June 15th,
and that Muslims should not "be embarrased about this ... let's get rid of
them now."
With full knowledge that the Islamic State terrorists are
using Muslim immigration to infiltrate America and European nations, Obama
still insists on bringing more Muslim "refugees" into the country,
and simultaneously, he and his "progressive" fascists seek to disarm
us all in the face of the greatest threat America has faced in decades. Whether
they are Muslim American citizens or foreign born islamofascists, Americans are
not fooled, and the pattern is clear from 9/11 to Ft Hood, Boston to
Chattanooga and San Bernadino to Orlando.
It is also worth noting that in 1995, Timothy McVeigh
committed the worse most heinous act of domestic terrorism in U.S. history,
when he bombed the Murrah Federal Building, murdering 168 Americans and
wounding over 650 more. His weapon of choice? -- 350 pounds of “Tovex Blastrite
Gel" and approximately 2000 pounds of fertilizer and diesel fuel.
Incredibly (by the time this piece is released) the Senate
is poised to vote on June 20th on a bill that effectively abrogates much of the
Bill of Rights. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) caved to pressure
from Chris Murphy's recent filibuster
and other harangues and harassment from Democrats Diane Feinstein (CA), Harry
Reid (NV) and Chuck Schumer (NY). Feinstein's bill blocks gun purchases by
anyone on the vague and subjective
"no-fly-list" and if "a reasonable belief"
exists that he "may" use the gun "in connection with
terrorism." And if passed, it becomes too easy to strip anyone of their
2nd Amendment rights -- political opponents, Christian conservatives, Veterans --
anyone; through their own reasoning, half the Democratic Party would be
disqualified from owning a firearm.
Under Feinstein's bill "probable cause" and the
entire premise underlying the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments, from one’s right to
forcefully defend against any actual charge to facing one's accuser and
"due process" under the law is thrown out the window. This bill
presumes one guilty without any crime having been committed, and it presents
the same government officials who cannot protect America now as mind-readers
seeking to prosecute "thought-crimes." Feinstein's bill rips the Bill
of Rights asunder.
Howard Stern exclaimed on June 16th:
"The sheepdogs are protecting you, but some of them can't be with you all
day. There's not a sheepdog for every citizen, and a wolf is eating one of you
every night. 'Baaaaaaa, oh I know, let's remove all the guns from the sheep.'
What?"
Less liberty is not the answer, but abolishing
"gun-free zones" is certainly part of the solution. Stop giving
cowards intent on murdering scores of Americans an easy access, free and open
range of innocent Americans, who simply want to live their lives in freedom. Stop
trying to illegally disarm U.S. citizens; otherwise, we will continue to
witness one mass killing of defenseless innocents after another.
Even some in the LGBTQ community see the truth of the
matter. Pink Pistols has 45 chapters across America. Their spokeswoman, Gwendolyn Patton recently stated:
"... let us not reach for the low-hanging fruit of blaming the killer's
[Mateen's] guns. Let us stay focused on the fact that someone hated gay people
[and Americans] so much they were ready to kill. A human being did this [though
this is debatable]. The human being's tools are unimportant compared to the
bleakness of that person’s soul. I say again, GUNS did not do this ... [Don't]
demonize the man's tools ... condemn his acts and work to prevent such acts in
the future."
We saw Obama and the Democrats run roughshod over America
concerning Obamacare, immigration and other laws, when they held the majority.
Can you imagine what the Democrat "progressives" would do to the
country if they could disarm all Americans?
The Framers of the Constitution would not ratify the
Constitution until the Second Amendment was included. They knew that this one
thing would always stand as a safeguard for all of our rights against any
future government that might seek to once more impose tyranny on the people.
Our Second Amendment Rights, the rights of all Americans,
are self-evident, inherent and inalienable, whether or not the disingenuous,
uneducated and ill-informed idiots of the Far Left Democratic
"Progressive" Party wish to acknowledge the fact, and whether or not
those rights are written down in black and white on paper in a document
anywhere, it does not make this fact any less true. And in this sense, any license, tax or regulation on the
Second Amendment is unConstitutional, since Americans do not
possess our natural rights by contract or grant from the federal government.
Americans regained and secured their natural rights once upon a time by
revolution, and we can do so again.
By Justin O. Smith
________________
Edited by John R. Houk
All links as well text embraced by brackets are by the
Editor.
