DONATE

Showing posts with label Chick-fil-A. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chick-fil-A. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2014

Ducking from the Truth

Agenda- Homo Plan Change America
Mark Alexander of The Patriot Post tackles the Left Wing usage of the tool of the Homosexual Agenda used to depreciate Christianity and Biblical Morality in order to transform society into a Leftist Utopia. This is a subject that is nearly if not totally ignored by the Mainstream Media and unfortunately the leading Conservative pundits in America. Why? The ungodly union of Leftist Transformationism and the Homosexual Agenda have successfully managed the narrative that defending Biblical Morality is bigotry as well as giving Homosexual activism the aegis of the destruction of Religious Liberty.
 
JRH 1/10/14
********************************
Ducking from the Truth
The 'Gay Agenda' v. Liberty
 
By Mark Alexander
January 8, 2014
 
Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.” –George Washington (Farewell Address, 1796)
 
For five decades, a relentless and insidious campaign to undermine faith and family, the foundational tenets of our Republic, has been on the rise. With the 2008 election of Barack Hussein Obama, the most faith-intolerant regime in the history of our Republic, the growth of that campaign has become a malignant battle for the hearts and minds of American voters.
 
Most of the participants in this battle are unwitting pawns of the political Left, believing that they are simply supporting individual rights. In reality, they are systematically eroding the ground beneath the two most critical pillars of Liberty: faith and family. In the end, the inevitable and irrevocable terminus of these actions is tyranny.
 
Though social research organizations consistently find that those with gender identity issues make up less than 3% of the population, that tiny minority has become the most vociferous enemy of faith and family – and has rallied a substantial political constituency. For that reason, few social and political commentators will even venture into this arena, fearing public vilification and removal of their public platform by Leftmedia print and TV outlets under pressure from weak-kneed advertisers.
 
No such fear here, but as a prerequisite for this analysis, let it be stated clearly that the central government has no constitutional authority to regulate sexual activity between consenting adults. However, our Republic most assuredly has a stake in protecting religious Liberty, and marriage as defined by the Laws of Nature.
 
The first target of the Left and their homosexual agenda constituency is the first clause of the First Amendment to our Constitution, which states simply, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
 
That succinct proscription notwithstanding, Leftist judicial supremacists, who occupy what Thomas Jefferson called “the Despotic Branch,” have adulterated the plain language of that clause to greatly suppress the free exercise of Liberty across the nation. They have succeeded in large measure to supplant Rule of Law with the rule of men – the rule of egocentric executives and legislators who believe they are the font of wisdom sufficient for ruling over their subjects.
 
The second pillar of Liberty targeted by the Left is the family – beginning with marriage. In the words of Justice Joseph Story, “Marriage is … in its origin, a contract of natural law. … It is the parent, and not the child of society; the source of civility and a sort of seminary of the republic.”
 
 
As you recall, in 2008 candidate Obama himself feigned disdain for same-sex marriage and asserted a pretense of faith: “I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian … it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix. … I am not somebody who promotes same-sex marriage.” Of course, that was just another bald-faced election-year lie. A full 12 years earlier, while running for Illinois State Senate, Obama said this: “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages.”
 
Obama’s expressed sentiment therefore lasted only as long as the campaign. No sooner had he been elected than he began a concerted effort to undermine marriage by promoting “gay rights.” Most notably in 2010, just weeks before the “Tea Party Republicans” who had decimated the Democrats in the 2010 midterm elections took control of the House, Obama signed last-minute legislation overturning the Clinton-era policy of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” thus subjecting military ranks to overt homosexuality.
 
What Leftist politicos understand, but most of their constituents do not, is that the deconstruction of religious Liberty and the family, starting with the redefinition of marriage, will ultimately result in the rise of an oppressive and dictatorial successor.
 
Occasionally, the Left attempts to merge both its assault on religious Liberty and upon the family into one battle, endeavoring to kill two birds with one stone – the first being the “Natural Law” contract of marriage, and the second being the objection to homosexuality by every religion on the planet.
 
Such was the case in May 2012, when homosexual advocates managed a successful coup d'état against one of the most faith- and family-centered organizations in the nation – the Boy Scouts of America – opening the door for homosexual members in order to open the next door for homosexual leaders.
 
Emboldened by that success, they began a national campaign to target Christian-owned pro-family businesses – small and large – endeavoring to break their support for marriage by way of legal injunctions against their expression of their faith. Finally, the coercive “gay lobby” campaign met its match.
 
A very high-profile failure was the homosexual assault on Chick-fil-A due to CEO Dan Cathy, and his very vocal Christian affirmation of faith and family. Cathy’s rejection of so-called “gay marriage” was the catalyst for an attempted national boycott against the restaurant chain, but the result was an outpouring of support for Chick-fil-A.
 
But homosexual advocates suffered a far more spectacular defeat just last month, as you undoubtedly heard, when the Arts and Entertainment network attempted to expel the patriarch of one of the most successful cable television programs in history, solely due to his expression of faith and support for marriage and family in a GQ magazine profile.
 
 
The details of the A&E defeat provide a useful case study in “David and Goliath” politics – grassroots activism versus huge media and political adversaries.
 
Phil Robertson, who heads the popular Duck Dynasty clan featured on A&E, was asked by GQ editors about sin and repentance, and he responded with a paraphrase from 1 Corinthians 6: “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers – they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.” Robertson added a few comments considered crude by “cultured” leftists, but reflective of the provincial language of his Louisiana culture.
 
As soon as the article was published online, Robertson was attacked by the two most influential national homosexual advocacy organizations – the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation and the so-called “Human Rights” Campaign – for making “anti-gay remarks” in the GQ magazine profile. Typical of how Robertson’s remarks were framed are these pathetic pontifications from GLAAD spokesman Wilson Cruz: “Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil’s lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe. Phil’s decision to push vile and extreme stereotypes is a stain on A&E and his sponsors who now need to re-examine their ties to someone with such public disdain for LGBT people and families.”
 
A&E, which previously asked the Robertson family to reduce its show’s references to guns and closing with prayer – requests the Robertsons refused – swiftly expelled Phil, noting, “His personal views in no way reflect those of A&E Networks, who have always been strong supporters and champions of the LGBT community.”
 
Within days of A&E’s decision, Sandra Cochran, CEO of Cracker Barrel, one of the largest family restaurant chains in the nation, announced with much fanfare that she was ordering merchandise connected to Phil Robertson removed from their shelves. Cochran noted, “We operate within the ideals of fairness, mutual respect and equal treatment of all people. These ideals are the core of our corporate culture.”
 
As I wrote Cochran, “Nothing Phil Robertson said offends your ‘corporate culture,’ unless you are offended by the foundational sacrament of marriage between man and woman as defined in the Old and New Testaments of Christian Scripture – and every other major world religion.”
 
The nation’s largest retailer, Walmart, wisely kept its shelves loaded with Duck Dynasty products.
 
The execs of A&E, Cracker Barrel and the highest profile homosexual advocacy organizations assumed the rest of the Robertson clan was more invested in their lucrative contracts with A&E than their faith, and their viewers were more invested in the asinine antics of reality shows than the substance and world view of the characters in this particular show.
 
Bad assumptions. Neither the Robertsons, nor their fans, duck the truth.

In less than 48 hours, Cracker Barrel issued one of the most stunning corporate apologies on record. “When we made the decision to remove and evaluate certain Duck Dynasty items, we offended many of our loyal customers. Our intent was to avoid offending, but that’s just what we’ve done. You flat out told us we were wrong. We listened. Today, we are putting all our Duck Dynasty products back in our stores, and, we apologize for offending you.”
 
 
Days later, after Phil Robertson’s family advised the network that they would not go on without their patriarch, A&E folded its hand. Apparently the network execs were more invested in their viewer share revenue than being “strong supporters and champions of the LGBT community.” As some sort of recompense for their gender-confused audience, they announced, “We will use this moment to launch a national public service campaign (PSA) promoting unity, tolerance and acceptance among all people, a message that supports our core values as a company, and the values found in Duck Dynasty.”
 
This week, the Robertson family announced their new endorsement line of firearms, undoubtedly a source of additional heartburn for A&E.
 
This resounding defeat of the homosexual lobby is a case study in how grassroots Americans can successfully confront and crush the Left elite. By extension, it is also a strong indication that Patriots across the nation are poised to deliver the same humiliating defeat to leftists in 2014 that they did in 2010.
 
The bottom line is that a growing number of grassroots Americans recognize that the Chick-fil-A and Duck Dynasty showdowns are not about homosexuals, chickens or ducks, but about the suppression of faith expression and the undermining of Liberty. Phil Robertson is not a bigot, but those who suppress religious Liberty in the name of “tolerance and diversity” certainly are.
 
Those who support the “gay agenda” certainly think they do so for the right reasons. But they’ve been lulled into thinking that this issue has no overarching implications for the Liberty of future generations. They are wrong.
 
Send a courteous message for those who would undermine faith and family:
 
o   Contact A&E: feedbackaetv@aenetworks.com
 
o   Contact the so-called “Human Rights” Campaign: http://www.hrc.org/the-hrc-story/contact-us
 
o   Contact the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation: http://www.glaad.org/contact
 
 
Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Fortis Vigilate Paratus et Fidelis
________________________________
© 2014, The Patriot Post.
 
From the bottom of Patriot Post Email
 
*PUBLIUS*
 
The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2014 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.
 
REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: "The Patriot Post (www.patriotpost.us/subscribe/ )"
 

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Rush on Chick-fil-A: The target is Christianity

Rush Limbaugh - Chick-fil-A
Rush says the homosexual and Leftist attack on Chick-fil-A is really an attack on Christianity. Everyone should know that but no one in the MSM is publicizing that notion. GOOD FOR RUSH! Also the Lesbian actress – Jane Lynch – of the TV show Glee proclaimed in public at a roast for Rosanne Barr: “F*** Chick-fil-A”. You are darn toot’in the Chick-fil-A attack is an attack on Christianity!

JRH 8/7/12
*************************
Rush on Chick-fil-A: The target is Christianity
'What reason is there for government to get bigger if not to police things?'

August 6, 2012

PALM BEACH, Fla. – Radio giant Rush Limbaugh says the ongoing national dispute over Chick-fil-A’s stance for biblically based marriage is nothing short of an attack on Christianity as a whole.

“Now Christianity has to be banned, and that’s where this is all headed,” Limbaugh said this afternoon on his top-rated program. “All this stuff at Chick-fil-A, the target is Christianity, not Chick-fil-A. The target is freedom of religion. [With] Obama and Obamacare, the target is always freedom. When we’re talking about liberals, the target is always freedom.”

Chick-fil-A’s president, Dan Cathy, has come under heavy fire from homosexual activists since he said he supported the biblical definition that marriage is between one man and one woman.

Limbaugh came to his defense today, saying, “Dan Cathy, the head honcho of Chick-fil-A, he’s not making a political statement when he talks about the values the company believes in. It gets interpreted that way because the left has politicized gay marriage and so forth. And so they recognize it and think it’s a threat.”

“I just cherish freedom. I cherish liberty. It’s under assault,” Limbaugh continued, explaining that freedom “has to give as the government gets bigger. That’s not even arguable. What reason is there for government to get bigger if not to police things, including thought? Fix things, police things, administer things, regulate things, all of that is – you might not want to call it an assault – but it’s all aimed at freedom, pure and simple. And any activity that rewards freedom, any activity that freedom plays a profound role in, particularly something that is successful or good, is an enemy.”

WND is also reporting today that in the wake of last week’s hugely successful Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day, the star of a popular Fox television show decided to drop the F-bomb on the restaurant chain during a Comedy Central roast of Roseanne Barr.

Jane Lynch, a lesbian actress who plays gym coach Sue Sylvester on “Glee,” brought the eatery into her introduction of Roseanne at the Hollywood Palladium in California Saturday night.

With female celebrities including Carrie Fisher, Katey Sagal and Ellen Barkin participating in the roast of Barr, Lynch said, “This show is serving up more old spoiled hens than a Chick-fil-A. Oh, that reminds me … F— Chick-fil-A.”
____________________________
Joe Kovacs, author of the brand-new No. 1 best-seller, "The Divine Secret: The Awesome and Untold Truth About Your Phenomenal Destiny", as well as the No. 1 best-seller "Shocked by the Bible: The Most Astonishing Facts You've Never Been Told," is executive news editor for WND.

© Copyright 1997-2012 All Rights Reserved. WND.com Inc

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Americans flock to support Chick-fil-A



Homosexual activists plan a same-sex smooch-in on Friday. I doubt the perversity will reach the national numbers of Americans supporting Family Values today!

Check it out!


Palin Barks Back at Cheney

Sarah Palin 1
John R. Houk
© August 1, 2012

Sarah Palin joins the call for Chick-fil-A day support on August 1 AND faces up to former VP Dick Cheney’s criticism of her selection as the 2008 VP nomination.

Here is a snippet Cheney’s criticism of Palin:



Palin was just as qualified to be a Presidential candidate as then Senator Barack Hussein Obama who was a first termer with no Executive experience. On the other hand Palin had a successful Executive Branch in her first two years as Governor of Alaska. Palin’s only weakness was growing weary of Leftists lying about her family and her own Alaskan Congress coming up with frivolous ethics investigations in which she was CLEARED; however Alaskan Dems were relentless as was the MSM in smearing Palin.

So Palin packed her bags as Governor of Alaska and has proceeded with a hugely successful campaign of supporting Tea Party candidates across the USA. Alaska’s loss was the Tea Party Movement’s gain even though to my knowledge Palin has no formal ties to any particular Tea Party organization.

I am about to cross post an article from The Blazes that talks about Palin’s support for Chick-fil-A first and then addresses Cheney’s criticism. The Blaze has some video from a Greta Van Susteren interview. At the end of my thoughts here I am going to snip the part in which Palin quite correctly points to the error of Cheney’s thinking on her being a VP choice in 2008.



JRH 8/1/12
******************************
Sarah Palin Delivers Passionate Response to Dick Cheney‘s Claim That She Was a ’Mistake’ & Calls Chick-fil-A Protests ‘Bigoted’

August 1, 2012 at 7:47am

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was in rare form last night when she joined FOX News’ Greta Greta VanSusteren to discuss issues ranging from the Chick-fil-A controversy to Vice President Dick Cheney’s statement that she was a poor choice for Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008.

The segment opened with the controversy surrounding the fast-food chain. VanSusteren asked Palin why she was jumping in to support the restaurant (recently, Palin Tweeted in support of Chick-fil-A). Rather than focusing upon the issue of gay marriage, Palin said her support was rooted in a dislike for the ban that has been advanced against the company.

“I’m speaking up for him and his First Amendment rights and anyone else who would wish to express their — not anti-gay people sentiment — but their support for traditional marriage,” Palin said, referring to Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy. “President Obama and Joe Biden — they both supported the exact same thing until just a few months ago when they had to flip-flop to shore up the homosexual voter base.”

The politician went on to call the poor treatment of Chick-fil-A and the calls for bans on the food establishment ”intolerant, bigoted, hypocritical“ and ”narrow-minded.”

As for Cheney, who recently said that it was “a mistake” for Palin to be chosen for vice-president in 2008, the former Alaskan governor had plenty to say. When VanSusteren asked Palin about this statement, she passionately responded, saying that she was honored to have been chosen as a candidate and that it would have been a mistake for her not to accept the nomination. Here’s her full response:

“The mistake would have been me just deciding that, ‘Hey I love my 86, 87 percent approval rating up there in Alaska as the governor moving and shaking and watching corrupt politicians and businessmen to go prison for crony capitalism. Working on 16 to 20 percent of domestic energy supplies being able to be increased via Alaska’s resource development. Ethics reform legislation that I was working on — that led to that 86 percent approval rating.

I could have decided, you know, I don’t want to be blooded up, I don’t want my family to go through what we will have to go through in order to put ourselves forward in the name service to this country. But I did it. It would have been a mistake to have hunkered down — just lived that luxurious…comfortable lifestyle in Alaska…We like so many people in this country decided, we will do all that we can in order to defend our republic, put America back on track. And I believe I did the right thing in accepting that call.”

Watch the entire interview, below (passionate response to Cheney starts around 7:23):

 
______________________________
Palin Barks Back at Cheney
John R. Houk
© August 1, 2012
____________________________
Sarah Palin Delivers Passionate Response to Dick Cheney‘s Claim That She Was a ’Mistake’ & Calls Chick-fil-A Protests ‘Bigoted’

All information © 2012 TheBlaze LLC

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Chick-Fil Shows How Religious Freedoms Are Being Lost

Chick-fil-A Day

Ann Matos got my attention commenting on an article by Thomas Messner who writes that the Leftist and Homosexual activist attack on the Family Values promoted by Chick-Fil-A.

 

Messner’s point is that all the Leftist talk to ban Chick-Fil-A is just one more symptom of utilizing political power and money-sucking litigation to force Christians to be quiet about Biblical Morality.

 

Friends that is so evil that I can say that is Satanic.

 

JRH 7/31/12

Please Support With SlantRight 2.0 Tip Contributions.

***************************

Chick-Fil Shows How Religious Freedoms Are Being Lost

 

By Ann Matos

Jul 30, 2012 10:44 pm

ReaganForge Yahoo Group (I believe Registration Required)

 

Use the above link to read a chilling article how Christians who express their conscience are being placed under legal, cultural and economic pressure to recant.  I feel these are signs of the end times and may indeed be unstoppable.  However, for the sake of our nation, for what it once was, for what it can be again, I haven't yet given up hope that this situation can be reversed.  After all, when Jonah went to Ninevah, they repented.  Who knows?  Maybe we will yet have a great revival -- a time of renewed Christian committment (sic), as Billy Graham prays for.  I still believe ... ... ...

 

Ann

__________________________

Chick-fil-A Latest Example of How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Religious Freedom

 

By Thomas Messner

July 30, 2012 at 3:30 pm

The Foundry

 

Same-sex marriage combined with nondiscrimination policies will result in significant discrimination against individuals and institutions that hold to the belief that marriage is—and should be defined in law as—the union of one man and one woman.

In the latest illustration of how this will happen, a Chickkago alderman recently explained that he plans to block the Chickkken restaurant Chick-fil-A from building a new restaurant in his ward because he is offended by the belief of the company’s owners that marriage is between one man and one woman.

 

“There are consequences for one’s actions, statements and beliefs,” the official stated. “Because of this man’s ignorance, I will deny Chick-fil-A a permit to open a restaurant in my ward.”

 

Under pressure, this official might attempt to alter his rationale for targeting Chick-fil-A—or even back down altogether like the mayor of Boston did when he was criticized for targeting Chick-fil-A in his city.

 

However it turns out, though, the Chick-fil-A situation certainly adds to the growing list of cases illustrating how individuals and institutions that continue to support marriage as one man and one woman will likely face a variety of significant burdens:

 

§  A Christian photographer in New Mexico who refused to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony was hauled before a human rights tribunal and forced to pay nearly $6,700 in attorneys’ fees to the complainant;

 

§  Christian charities have been forced to stop providing foster care and adoption services because they cannot in good conscience comply with laws that would require them to violate beliefs about marriage and family;

 

§  Boy Scouts of America has lost equal access to public facilities and programs because of its position on open homosexuality;

 

§  A graduate student claims that she was expelled from a public university counseling program after she conscientiously objected to counseling a potential client seeking assistance regarding a homosexual relationship; and

 

§  A Christian organization at a public university was denied official recognition because it required officers and voting members to adhere to traditional Christian teachings, including a prohibition on extramarital sex.

 

This is not “live and let live.” This is the state—and sometimes private citizens and the culture at large—punishing people who refuse to recant their belief that marriage is the union of a husband and wife.

 

This kind of thing happens because proponents of same-sex marriage declare support for marriage as one man and one woman to be a form of irrational prejudice and bigotry similar to racism. In this view, support for marriage as one man and one woman is the kind of belief that should be purged from public life through legal, cultural, and economic pressure.

 

This is precisely what is happening right now to Chick-fil-A.

 

Defending marriage takes courage. For more stories of people who have demonstrated courage in standing for marriage as one man and one woman, visit the website of the Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance, a group that stands up for people who stand up for marriage.

 

Posted in Family and Religion, Featured

_____________________________

The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation

 

© 2012, The Heritage Foundation
Conservative policy research since 1973

Monday, May 23, 2011

Answer the Census, or else, II

Big Brother Eye

Below is a Conspiracy alert from NoGuff about the U.S. Census Bureau which will be followed by another email that I should have posted long ago that was a part of a Thought Crimes series of which I have only captured only a few.

JRH 5/23/11
**************************

Answer the Census, or else, II
5/19/11

Hi Friends,

I told you all one year ago about my little encounter with the Census. Now they've come back.

I was wondering if any of you have heard about The American Community Survey [SlantRight Editor: Click HERE to read another encounter American Community Survey Agents from January 2010] being conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau? I was wondering because I've received the survey packet. I've never heard about it, so for those of you who haven't, I'm going to give you a peak at what's in it.

I got the packet then tossed it out. Then I ended up getting phone calls every day about it from the Census Bureau. Then I got another one in the mail. So I opened it up.

There's some info about it on Wiki at http://tinyurl.com/bt24zk.
 

There it says "several U.S. Representatives have challenged it as unauthorized by the census act and violative of the Right to Financial Privacy Act." The Commerce Dept. responded that since it’s not a "law enforcement agency," then it can do what it wants in this respect.

The About flyer in the packet says the survey "collects information about population and housing characteristics for the nation, states, cities, counties, metro areas, and communities on a continuous basis."

"Communities need data about the well-being of children, families, and the older population to provide services to them. By responding, you are helping your community to establish goals, identify problems and solutions, and measure the performance of programs."

"The data also are used to decide where to locate new highways, schools, hospitals, and community centers; to show a large corporation that a town has the workforce the company needs; and in many other ways."

B***s**t.

The Census Bureau (the Census) counts population to determine the number of people in the country and to determine Congressional representation. That's it.

It also reads, "Your response to this survey is required by law." That may be true, but the U.S. government does not determine where to build hospitals or schools or help businesses relocate. So it’s b***s***t.

The "traffic" and "build roads" excuse is b***s***t, too, because cities get traffic counts either by deploying those black cables across the road lanes that counts the hits or by new computerized methods using traffic cameras. And besides, it isn't a federal issue. None of these questions are.

The Census isn't supposed to ask your name, either. In fact, the envelope was addressed to me as "Resident." So if that's true, why does this survey ask my name? Not only that, it asks a lot of really specific questions. This is nothing but Big Brother and a violation of my privacy.

I've included below what those questions are. To keep it short (yeah, I know) I didn't include all of them, and those I included are paraphrased. A few of them were so offensive that I quoted them for your amazement. I'm only going to answer the "Date" and the "Number of persons living there." That's all they need to know, which I already answered the first time last year.

Please take a look at these questions. While reading them please ask yourself: Why are they really asking these questions and why we should be compelled to answer them?

Thanks,

-NG
_____________________
[SlantRight Editor: This part of the email has an example of the intrusive questions of the extra-constitutional census document]

Your full name, address, & phone number, and the name of every person who lives with you.

-Your place of birth.

-Your highest education. If you have a degree, what was your major?

-Your ethnic origin.

-What languages do you speak?

-Where you lived a year ago.

-What type of health insurance you have, specifically.

-"Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?"

-Your marital status.

-Were you married, widowed, or divorced in the last 12 months?

-How many times have you been married?

-What year did you first get married?

-Did you have any children in the past 12 months?

-Your military status or history.

-Did you work last week?

-How many hours?

-The address where you worked.

-How did you get to work?

-How many people ride with you to work?

-What time do you leave for work?

-What type of business did you work at?

-What is your employer's name & address?

-What was your position?

-What were your "most important activities?"

-How much money did you make last week?

-How much do you make per year, itemized as wages, interest/dividends, retirement benefits, securities, welfare/public assistance, disability, unemployment insurance, child support, alimony?

-What type of structure do you live in?

-When was it built?

-What is the size of the land it occupies?

-When did you first move in?

-"In the past 12 months, what were the actual sales of all agricultural products from this property?"

-"Is there a business or a medical office on this property?"

-How many rooms are in your home? And how many of these are bedrooms?

-Does your home have running water, a flush toilet, bathtub or shower, sink & faucet, refrigerator, telephone?

-How many automobiles are kept there for use by the residents?

-What do you use to heat/cool your home?

-How much do you spend on electricity? Water? Heating oil?

-Did anyone living there receive food stamps?

-Do you rent or own your residence?

-What is your monthly rent or mortgage? If you live in a condo, what is the monthly condo fee? Or for your mobile home?

-What is your home worth?

-What are your annual real estate taxes? Are these taxes paid as part of your mortgage? Or paid as part of your insurance?

-How much do you pay for insurance?

_________

"U.S. Census Sends Intrusive 28-Page Questionnaires to Americans"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rL6712oouzA  

"Bachmann Rails Against Census On Beck"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZS9UW0okY4  

"The Census Is Getting Personal"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsDhkPym01k  

If you've read this far then you probably don't think I'm a paranoid nut. So try this on for size. You probably know that fingerprints can be lifted from paper. When was the last time you sealed an envelope without using your tongue to moisten the seal?

Police can get your DNA from your saliva on an envelope seal. And it holds up in court.
 
USA Today

http://tinyurl.com/3v4b579
 

Say hello to Big Brother for me.

-NG
++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This also was Sent by NoGuff to my YouTube Channel Inbox.

JRH 4/28/11
*************************

Thought Crime V
4/25/11

Hello my Friends,

My "Thought Crime" series is usually about the ultra-Left's (now mainstream) homosexual agenda against our freedoms as Americans and their attempts to silence and oppress Christians through Political Correctness, intimidation, propaganda and legislation.

But in this message I'm adding some news articles and videos regarding related topics, such as the ultra-Left's targeting of our other freedoms with the same tactics, such as our 1st and 2nd Amendment freedoms.

Once again, I'm very sorry about the length.


-NG

___________________________


"Illinois Gun Owners' Privacy Under Attack"
 
An AP reporter demands access to the database of gun owners. This way he can "out" them and other Leftists will take the baton from him and go further, such as intimidation and public ridicule, and whatever else, in order to suppress gun ownership.
 
Elisabeth Meinecke, Townhall.com
http://tinyurl.com/4kq6srd 

"NH Supreme Court: Homeschooled girl must go to public school against mom's wishes"
 
LifeSiteNews
http://tinyurl.com/6feubb5  


(please ignore the obvious racist elements of this story & report)
"Children Can Now Be Taken from Parents for Thought Crimes"
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=1589  


"Mom Says Child Taken Away From Her Really Is Sick"
 
WFTV-9 Orlando
http://www.wftv.com/video/26546123/index.html  


"Woman loses custody of child for five years for refusing C-section"
 
LifeSiteNews
http://tinyurl.com/45qtfm7 

"Did State Take Child Because Dad Associated With Oath Keepers?"
 
The Blaze.com
http://tinyurl.com/27yakdk  


"Sharia Law enforced in Britain"
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHFeQjrFnrI  
Thanks to my friend The Gates Of Vienna II for the upload

"English Cross of St. George Flag Deemed Offensive to Muslims"
 
A young football fan displays the Flag of St. George (the flag of England) on his car and is ordered by police to remove it.
http://tinyurl.com/awfgyz  

"Kid flag ban by PC teachers"
 
Young children are scorned, berated, and sent home if they show up to school wearing a Flag of St. George on their clothing, or if they are dropped off by a car bearing the flag.
 
The Sun
http://tinyurl.com/lp7bhh  


"UK welfare housing bosses: Flag of St. George banned in run-up to World Cup"
 
JihadWatch.org
http://tinyurl.com/3dtr8fb  

"English flag offensive to Muslims?"
 
"Officials worry prisoners might associate red cross with Crusades"

WorldNetDaily
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=32674  
(excerpt)
 
"Prison officials in Britain are concerned that tie pins worn by officers featuring the St. George's Cross -- the symbol on England's flag -- could offend Muslims who might associate it with the Crusades of the 11th, 12th and 13th centuries."
 
Yes, friends, you read that correctly - Prisoners. Western officials looking out for what part of their own heritage and cultural & national identity "might offend”.... prisoners. Please, stop the insanity.
 
-NG

A related article:

"British mull discarding flag to avoid offending Muslims"
 
JihadWatch.org
http://tinyurl.com/ylbl5xy  


___________________________


"Lesbian Insults Get Comic Fined"
 
Fox 5 News, NYC, quoting the Vancouver Sun
http://tinyurl.com/3s8u3bn  
(an excerpt)
 
VANCOUVER -- A Canadian comic has been ordered to pay CA$15,000 (US$15,745) to a woman he taunted along with her same-sex partner during a show in a Vancouver restaurant..."

"Earle repeated vulgar language in public and attacked Pardy's identity and dignity as a woman and a lesbian and ordered the payment for lost wages and for injury to dignity, feelings and self respect."
 

Yes, you read that correctly, my friends. I honestly don't have any words for that one, except that Canada has lost the fight against the insanity and the ultra-Left's agenda. Please, let's not lose it here.

-NG
___________________________

Friends, I know you've heard this before, but it's 100% true; what starts in England eventually makes it over here to the USA. Keep an eye out for disturbing incidents like these. They are already starting to happen in Massachusetts - of course.

-NG

"Ruling forces last Catholic adoption agency in England and Wales to cease adoptions"
 
Catholic News Agency
http://tinyurl.com/2fywr8h  


"Couple quizzed by police for criticizing 'gay rights'"
 
The Christian Institute UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YXpO2viH9Q  


"Couple quizzed by police for complaining about 'gay rights'"
 
The Christian Institute UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZkgSA74tyM  


"Police quiz Christian pensioner over [anti] gay beliefs"
 
The Christian Institute UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0MV3Ls1-BM  

"Family-values campaigner quizzed by police for making 'homophobic' comments"
 
The Christian Institute UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-aqI2gBO7o  

"'A crime to criticize Islam' case on BBCs Question Time"
 
BBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqWosLCLsiU 

"Police examine church's Easter invite"
 
One person complained that a Christian church group dared hand out flyers for Easter services in "a place with a sizable gay community." Seven policemen were instantly dispatched to investigate.
 
The Christian Institute UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztUe1CM23dA  


"C4 News calls Pauline Howe's letter a crime"
 
A woman dared to complain about local gay pride parades.
 
Channel 4 UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJV0FwlYStM   

"Police tell Christian [street preacher]: It's a crime to say 'homosexuality is a sin'"
 
The Christian Institute UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdvyOJCAf8A  


"BBC news: Teacher scolds girl, 5, for talking about Jesus"
 
A little girl mentioned Hell (of the Bible) to a schoolmate in an email.
 
BBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u8Gv9YSWEY 

"Britain's War on Christianity: America's Future Fight?"

CBN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_muwtwIMb3A  


"Priest persecuted by Government and Church for calling [a known] Muslim Terrorist 'a terrorist'"
 
RT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MroBX82zGBU  


"Devil's Advocates? Priest slamming terror site defrocked by 'militant lobby'"
 
RT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PNAmPfDVjU&NR=1  

___________________________

Chik-fil-A logo

Have you ever been to Chick-fil-A? Great food. And they're family oriented. Read below, and please visit Chick-fil-A again.

-NG

"Gay groups attack Chick-fil-A for supporting marriage counseling event"
 
LifeSiteNews
http://tinyurl.com/4o6ckqc  


"A Christian Business in the Left's Crosshairs"
 
Michelle Malkin, TownHall.com
http://tinyurl.com/4c7uh2w  

A message from Eugene Delgaudio
President of the Public Advocate

Chick-fil-A, Crimes Against Humanity?


Dear Friend,

Chick-fil-A, one of the largest fast-food businesses in the U.S. provides jobs to some 50,000 employees and serves millions of customers at 1,500 outlets across the country. An American success story, wouldn't you agree? So, what's the problem?

Well, Chick-fil-A is run by Christians who believe in the godliness of marriage and family. In fact, the official statement of purpose is "to glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us and to have a positive influence on all who come in contact with Chick-fil-A."

And the company proves it by investing generously in community service initiatives such as scholarships, summer camps for children and teens, foster care, and marriage enrichment programs. But according to recent homosexual blogs, Chick-fil-A's corporate principles constitute a crime against humanity.

When it was reported that a Chick-fil-A in Pennsylvania agreed to donate sandwiches and brownies for a marriage seminar sponsored by the Pennsylvania Family Institute, which happens to oppose same-sex marriage, homosexual activists went into full swing.

Dutifully, the rank and file waged war against Chick-fil-A calling for boycotts, intimidating college campuses into banning the business, and cruelly calling it "Jesus Chicken."

I am telling you all of this to let you know that the threat to the family is real... and relentless. Simply put, the homosexual agenda begins with destroying the family. From there, it's just a domino effect, and they will continue to tear down all decency in our society. But together, you and I are working to prevent that from happening.

So, thank you for standing with me, and Public Advocate. I know you believe, as I do, that our families are worth it. If you can, today, please make the most generous contribution you can afford.

http://tinyurl.com/4m5f6rp  

-Eugene Delgaudio

__________________________

Stop Homo Classroom Act

I'm not sure where I got the text below, possibly from the Public Advocate.

-NG

Please go research the "Student Non-Discrimination Act."
[You might have better luck researching Homosexual Classroom Act.]

[SlantRight Editor: Click HERE to go to the Public Advocate petition against SNDA. There it is called the Homosexual Classroom Act.]

The Radical Homosexuals infiltrating the United States Congress have a plan:

Indoctrinate an entire generation of American children with pro-homosexual propaganda and eliminate traditional values from American society.

Their ultimate dream is to create a new America based on sexual promiscuity in which the values you and I cherish are long forgotten.

I hate to admit it, but if they pass the deceptively named "Student Non-Discrimination Act," that's exactly what they'll do.

Better named the "Homosexual Classrooms Act," its chief advocate in Congress is Rep. Jared Polis, himself an open homosexual and radical activist.


the Homosexual Classrooms Act contains a laundry list of anti-family provisions that will:

*** Require schools to teach appalling homosexual acts so "homosexual students" don't feel "singled out" during already explicit sex-ed classes;

*** Spin impressionable students in a whirlwind of sexual confusion and misinformation, even peer pressure to "experiment" with the homosexual "lifestyle;"

*** Exempt homosexual students from punishment for propositioning, harassing, or even sexually assaulting their classmates, as part of their specially-protected right to "freedom of self-expression;"

*** Force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a "hostile learning environment" for homosexual students.

And that's just the beginning of the Homosexual Lobby's radical agenda.

Please oppose the Student Non-Discrimination Act. It was introduced into Congress in 2010 but did not finally pass. Actually it didn't come up for a vote because of more pressing legislation. But it can be introduced again, and I have no doubt it will.

-NG
________________________
SlantRight Editor: These two NoGuff emails have been run through minor editing and Word spell check.