President Trump is
accusing the New York Times of treason because the Leftist rag told the world about
a classified U.S. mission to mess with Russia undoubtedly due Russian cyber warfare
being conducted against the United States. The most public of which is cyber
meddling in U.S. election cycles.
I would not be
surprised to find out some day the USA and Russia have been exchanging cyber
barbs for quite some time. Is it ethical or even legal for the NYT to expose clandestine
and probably Classified cyber missions intended as bloodless reprisals to Russian
cyber-crimes? It’s definitely not ethical! If exposing Classified actions
against a foreign enemy isn’t illegal, IT SHOULD BE!
Justin Smith pointed
this post on my Facebook Group Social
Media Jail Conversations for Conservatives & Counterjihadists(yeah I know, lengthy title. I had just
emerged from Facebook jail and was quite annoyed at the time. So I created the
group. Feel free to join the still relatively small group). The group URL
to Justin’s share is HERE.
Justin did not
include the URL from whence he found the post. Justin’s reason: The “URL is
being banned by Facebook”. The banned website is The Patriot Brief.
Interestingly The Patriot Brief
picked up the article from The National Sentinel.
It is from the original source I am cross posting below. In case you are
curious The Patriot Brief link to the
article is HERE.
(NationalSentinel) We have made
the observation before that in the age of
Donald Trump, the establishment media has become a national security liability
due to the fact that major outlets will publish just about anything in order to
undermine him.
But in doing so, these same outlets also undermine our country —
and some 312 million American citizens — making them as big a threat to our
security as any foreign power.
The New York Times did it again Sunday with a
story claiming that the Trump
administration has escalated attacks on Russia’s power grid:
The United States is stepping up
digital incursions into Russia’s electric power grid in a warning to President
Vladimir V. Putin and a demonstration of how the Trump administration is using
new authorities to deploy cybertools more aggressively, current and former
government officials said.
In interviews over the past
three months, the officials described the previously unreported deployment of
American computer code inside Russia’s grid and other targets as a classified
companion to more publicly discussed action directed at Moscow’s disinformation
and hacking units around the 2018 midterm elections.
Advocates of the more aggressive
strategy said it was long overdue, after years of public warnings from the
Department of Homeland Security and the F.B.I. that Russia has
inserted malware that could sabotage American power plants, oil and gas
pipelines, or water supplies in any future conflict with the United States.
But it also carries significant risk
of escalating the daily digital Cold War between Washington and Moscow.
“It has gotten far, far more aggressive over the past year,”
one senior intelligence official told the Times. “We are doing things at a
scale that we never contemplated a few years ago.”
You know what else carries “significant risk?” Reporting
classified information that provides valuable insight and intelligence for a
nuclear-armed adversary.
So much for “Russia collusion,” right?
The revelations infuriated POTUS Trump, and rightfully so.
He said on Twitter the paper committed “a virtual act of Treason” over its
report, The Hillnoted.
“Do you believe that the Failing New York Times just did a
story stating that the United States is substantially increasing Cyber Attacks
on Russia,” Trump tweeted. “This is a virtual act of Treason by a once great
paper so desperate for a story, any story, even if bad for our Country.”
“Anything goes with our Corrupt News Media today,” he added.
“They will do, or say, whatever it takes, with not even the slightest thought
of consequence! These are true cowards and without doubt, THE ENEMY OF THE
PEOPLE!”
He also claimed the Times report was “NOT TRUE.”
Do
you believe that the Failing New York Times just did a story stating that the
United States is substantially increasing Cyber Attacks on Russia. This is a
virtual act of Treason by a once great paper so desperate for a story, any
story, even if bad for our Country.....
The fact is the Times report most likely is true.
Rational people understand that in light of report after report regarding
Russia/China/Iran/North Korea targeting U.S. infrastructure, it makes sense for
America — which is a cyber superpower — to respond in kind.
But these kinds of operations are not meant to be revealed.
Doing so not only compromises said operations, but foreign intelligence
agencies gleaning details from published open source information very often
learn things that help them counter our moves.
Which, again, puts our country at risk.
The Times editors know this. They understand full well what
revealing this kind of highly classified information can mean to an adversary.
And yet, they published it anyway. Just to ‘get Donald
Trump.’
What does that say about them? It says — again —
that the president has been right about our own press since he took
office: They are more of an enemy than some of our
adversaries. Or at least the equivalent.
Even though we have speech protections written into our
Constitution via the First Amendment, you still can’t slander someone, libel
them, yell ‘fire’ in a theater, or engage in various forms of “hate” speech.
Publishing highly classified information that provides ‘aid
and comfort’ to an adversary should be legally actionable as well. Doing
so harms our country by weakening our national security.
Think about it: Does anyone believe that FDR would not have
punished the NYTimes or the Washington Post if either paper had published plans
for the D-Day invasion, just because their editors believed Americans ‘had a
right to know’?
Granted, we were in an actual war then, and we’re not
fighting Russia — now. Though you could argue that in places like Syria, where
Russian-sponsored mercenaries from the Wagner Group attacked U.S. forces and
their allies early last year, amounts to a real conflict. Or Russia putting
forces into Venezuela, in our hemisphere. Or encroaching on NATO’s eastern
flank.
We have argued before that
reporting the details about these highly classified operations are harming our
national security at a time when the world is more dangerous
than ever, not less, and for no good reason. The Times is just as guilty, in
our view, as the U.S. officials who leaked the information. If they can
be charged under the Espionage Act, then the ‘paper of record’ that published
the information should be equally culpable.
The National Sentinel is a fiercely independent,
non-corporate-owned news site dedicated to bringing our readers fresh,
informative content and the news of the day, without the bias and
political chicanery of the so-called “mainstream” media.
Updated daily and throughout the day, rely on us to
provide you with unfiltered news and information you won’t find anywhere else
that helps you to make informed decisions. Like the media is supposed to do.
The National Journal is part of the USA
Features Medianetwork of sites.
Follow USA Features on Facebook (click here).
A note about our advertisers: In
accordance with Federal Trade Commission regulations, we are disclosing that
our site earns a commission off of items we advertise and sell, as an
affiliate. Think of it like a tip for bringing you awesome content! In any
event, we have an advertising relationship with the stores we link to. Now
you know.
Even as the spoken and written Press propagandizes against President
Trump, there is plenty of documentation – with more to be revealed – that a frame-job
to depose a sitting President has occurred. Justin Smith does his part sharing
what can be publicly dug up by anyone searching about this coup attempt. YET in
this latest Justin submission he shared some misgivings about operation of
justice in today’s America:
I'm not overly optimistic that
William Barr is going to ever successfully prosecute the traitors to America
that were found within the Obama administration and working together across
party lines to destroy our republic, but maybe he will prove me wrong. If some
of these people are not prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and
imprisoned soon, I truly believe this republic is going to be so irreparably
damaged that we will find ourselves in a continuation of battles and civil
strife years out.
Justin has good reason for some pessimism. Politicians and
crooks related to the Democratic Party have been committing crimes and getting
away with it for at least a quarter century. Even if Attorney General is an
honest representative of justice, can he buck a system that has been corrupted
for so long? I HOPE SO!
Americans are wondering how such a well-engineered republic,
with all its time tested traditions and checks and balances, could be turned
into a blazing forest fire of political misdeeds and treason by the Obama
administration and the traitors within, but as the nation moves into the summer
of 2019, many remain hopeful that U.S. Attorney General William Barr, U.S. Attorney
John Durham and the fine efforts of men such as Representatives Devin Nunes and
Trey Gowdy and others will succeed in identifying, prosecuting and imprisoning
all involved in the plot against candidate and then President Trump. The nation
cannot 'move on' until these traitors, these rats who are now jumping their
sinking ship, are held accountable for their criminal and unconstitutional
actions.
Even prior to President
Trump's declassification order last month, escalating matters in the investigation
of the investigators, most of America was already aware of most of the facts,
already documented, in the seditious, subversive plot between the Hillary
Clinton campaign and many key government figures, including former president
Barack Obama, who could not have possibly failed to understand all the action.
And now, with a paper trail as wide as Percy Priest Lake[Blog
Editor: For readers who are unaware, the significance of the lake mention
undoubtedly relates to author Justin Smith residing in Rutherford County
Tennessee] and a fouled up coup, the truth is falling down on the traitors'
shoulders like radioactive ash.
Incredulously, during the last week of May, Representative Adam Schiff, House Intelligence
Committee Chairman, accused President Trump and
Attorney General Barr of attempting to "conspire to weaponize law
enforcement and classified information against their political enemies."
This would be hilarious if it weren't so serious, and if not for the fact that
Schiff accused President Trump of the very thing the Democratic Party and then
President Obama did for several of his last years in office.
If the dossier was not reliable enough to warn Trump's
campaign about the Kremlin's plot, how could it remotely serve as the basis for
obtaining FISA warrants to spy on Donald Trump and his inner circle? America
demands a full accounting of who, what, where, when, why and how the dossier
was used four, possibly five, times to dupe the FISA Court.
On May 24th, Representative Lindsey Graham, who has emerged as one of President
Trump's most intense and loyal supporters, spoke on Trump's declassification
order and told Fox and Friends:
"You're going to find out the mentality of the people investigating the
president. You're going to find out what they did and said. You're going to
find out that Papadopoulos was not working with the Russians. There'll be some
transcripts coming out where he says, 'If you did that, that'd be treason.' So
the bottom line is, there's going to be a lot of information about they were
warned Steele was a bad guy and you can't trust him. They blew through every
stop sign".
If Donald Trump wasn't the subject of the surveillance, as
the FBI asserted, then there was no valid reason not to apprise him of the
surveillance and what was suspected, during the January 2017 briefing. Who
decided not to give the President a FULL briefing on the dossier? Who decided
to deliberately hide this from the new Commander-In-Chief?
All of a sudden America is witnessing James Comey, James
Clapper, John Brennan accusing each other of being guilty of inserting the
unreliable Steele Dossier into a presidential assessment, since its ridiculous
stories and outright lies have been exposed. If they truly believed that this
dossier was fact -- that the American people faced an existential threat from
Donald Trump's sexual perversions, hatred of Obama and ties with Moscow, a
reprobate who stole the election from Hillary -- why are they not vying
for all the credit for warning President Obama and the American people, given
that they leaked and pushed this narrative over the past three years?
Fox News investigative journalist Catherine Herridge reported last month that an
email from former FBI Director James Comey in December 2016 indicates that it
was John Brennan who pushed the dossier to be included in the presidential
intelligence report. A source inside the CIA blames Comey for pressing the
dossier's inclusion.
Noting that he has seen the report, former Rep. Trey Gowdy has stated it does not look
good for John Brennan.
Protesting their innocence, Andrew McCabe and James Comey
are at odds too, even though they both swore President Trump remains a threat
to the republic and leaked classified documents to the media, supposedly to
save us, to save America. McCabe asserts that the Steele dossier was the
primary evidence presented to the FISA Court by the FBI, which Comey denies.
Why would they be at odds if their leaks were nobly motivated and their cause a
righteous one?
The fact that President Trump's declassification order
includes the Department of Treasury and the Department of Energy makes the
matter even darker, more intriguing, and, in fact, a critical point that
suggests pressure applied on President Trump not to release classified
documents was more subversion, and the focus was on using Russian collusion as
a way to conceal the FBI's spying and abuse of power; this was also part of a
broader attempt to cover up other massive Democrat corruption, especially the Uranium One Deal and real Russian collusion
by Democrats and the true depth of Clinton's pay-for-play operation
within the U.S. State Department, with many people aware of its
existence.
The salary men of the FBI dream of getting the top job, so
they play along, which explains Mueller's motivation as a one-time bag man
for Clinton in the Uranium One scheme.
And that makes for an extremely vile and dangerous partner when one considers
Hillary Clinton's vermin-like rapacity and her shrewd, corrupt, clever
ruthlessness. It's like selling one's soul to the devil and realizing too late
what a terrible deal one has made.
Abuse of power is to the Democrats what drugs are to the
addict, as exhibited by Susan Rice, National Security Advisor under Obama, who regularly unmasked American citizens
picked up on NSA surveillance sweeps. Also important to note, Samantha Power,
U.N. Ambassador, averaged unmasking someone every working day of 2016,
unmasking almost three-hundred; in comparison, John Bolton only unmasked three
during his tenure as U.N Ambassador, according to PJ Media.
And by now, it is pretty well acknowledged that elements
within the FBI and most likely the CIA conducted an illegal surveillance operation
against President Trump. Attorney General Barr has said as much,
stating the only remaining thing is to determine if the surveillance was
predicated upon the law and through a substantial evidentiary basis. The only
decision left is whether or not these people face charges or the whole thing
gets swept under the rug.
Some details remain to be confirmed, for instance:
Was the entrapment conman Josef Mifsud working for the
CIA and/or Britain's MI6 and/or Hillary Clinton's Fusion GPS contractor, or Orbis
Business Intelligence? I believe America is going to discover very few Russians
involved in all of this, but rather, they will see the FBI attempted to
infiltrate the Trump campaign and coordinated with Australia and the United Kingdom
to frame Donald Trump for collusion, so he could be prevented from taking
office or removed from office after the inauguration. The remaining questions
aren't going to be asked by the New York Times.
On May 15th, former U.S. Attorney for the District of
Columbia. Joe DiGenova explained to Breitbart News Daily:
"There was a brazen plot that started before the election, and the plot
was to illegally exonerate Hillary Clinton so that she could become president,
and then if she lost, there was an insurance policy to frame Donald Trump so he
could be prevented from taking office or removed from office after the
inauguration. ... John Brennan is at the core of this conspiracy. His handymen
and acolytes were Clapper and Comey and the senior FBI officials who worked
with Comey. Let's not forget that all of the people in senior levels of the
Department of Justice under Obama were involved in this plot. ... Loretta Lynch
was too dumb to be allowed to lead it," DiGenova speculated. "This is
Brennan Inc."
No longer standing unified, the drama between Brennan, Comey
and Clapper is just the surface. The Durham investigation could reach out of
the FBI and CIA up through the Obama administration, including Attorney General
Lynch and the White House itself.
We are in the midst of a morality play, where some of the
most unlikely villains have aligned themselves with the cause of tyranny and
Evil. And standing against them is the one time billionaire Playboy, President
Donald Trump, an unlikely hero. Yet here we are, with the tide turning our way
once more.
All of America's true patriots must raise their voice today
and tomorrow and for as long as it takes to arrive at a day of reckoning for
these traitors to the republic and our beloved America, otherwise and to our
chagrin, we may eventually see the administrative state simply bury this sorry
episode of American history. However, make no mistake, the weaponization of
federal agencies will happen again, and the next time, America may not be so
fortunate to have a president who is strong enough to withstand the onslaught
on behalf of the people and the nation.
When due process is ignored and justice is measured by
compulsion and our Fourth Amendment Rights against improper searches and
seizures seemingly no longer exist, freedom and liberty is endangered. When we
see men, who rebuke the Constitution, leverage the law through politics,
violating other men's 6th Amendment right to due process and acquiring power
over individual liberty by graft and scheme; and our representatives don't
protect us against them, but rather protects them against the people, our
republic is endangered. And when America sees corruption wielding heavy
influence and individual liberty so easily dispatched and suppressed, We the
People have realized that our freedom too is endangered and soon to perish.
It is no small thing to restore a republic once it has
fallen into corruption. It may be that the task is impossible, but it lies
before us to do. The alternative offers only a dark future, and thus, it is no
option at all. And if we do not try, the Founders' Republic and the larger war
for Western Civilization will be lost.
By Justin O. Smith
___________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text embraced by brackets and source links are by the
Editor.
Tim Brown uses an article by the Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel
to extrapolate the notion former CIA Director John Brennan (See
Also HERE)
was an Obamunist traitor. The notion arises because Brennan accused President
Trump of Treason for merely meeting with Putin in Helsinki.
WSJ: Was John Brennan The One Who Actually Engaged In
"Treason"?
When men like John Brennan point their finger at
others and cry "treason," they are attempting to pin the very crime
they are guilty of on someone else.
In a recent
column, Strassel seems to take issue with Brennan's
tweets from earlier this week when he tore into President
Donald Trump over his actions in Helsinki with Russian President Vladimir
Putin.
“Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki
rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanors,’”
tweeted Brennan.
Donald Trump’s press conference
performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of “high
crimes & misdemeanors.” It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were
Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican
Patriots: Where are you???
According to Ms. Strassel, "This is rough stuff, even
for an Obama partisan."
She then wrote:
That’s what Mr. Brennan is—a
partisan—and it is why his role in the 2016 scandal is in some ways more
concerning than the FBI’s. Mr. Comey stands accused of flouting the rules,
breaking the chain of command, abusing investigatory powers. Yet it seems far likelier
that the FBI’s Trump investigation was a function of arrogance and
overconfidence than some partisan plot. No such case can be made for Mr.
Brennan. Before his nomination as CIA director, he served as a close Obama
adviser. And the record shows he went on to use his position—as head of the
most powerful spy agency in the world—to assist Hillary Clinton’s campaign (and
keep his job).
Mr. Brennan has taken credit for
launching the Trump investigation. At a House Intelligence Committee hearing in
May 2017, he explained that he became “aware of intelligence and information
about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons.” The CIA can’t
investigate U.S. citizens, but he made sure that “every information and bit of
intelligence” was “shared with the bureau,” meaning the FBI. This information,
he said, “served as the basis for the FBI investigation.” My sources suggest
Mr. Brennan was overstating his initial role, but either way, by his own
testimony, he as an Obama-Clinton partisan was pushing information to the FBI
and pressuring it to act.
More notable, Mr. Brennan then
took the lead on shaping the narrative that Russia was interfering in the
election specifically to help Mr. Trump—which quickly evolved into the
Trump-collusion narrative. Team Clinton was eager to make the claim, especially
in light of the Democratic National Committee server hack. Numerous reports
show Mr. Brennan aggressively pushing the same line internally. Their problem
was that as of July 2016 even then-Director of National Intelligence James
Clapper didn’t buy it. He publicly refused to say who was responsible for the
hack, or ascribe motivation. Mr. Brennan also couldn’t get the FBI to sign on
to the view; the bureau continued to believe Russian cyberattacks were aimed at
disrupting the U.S. political system generally, not aiding Mr. Trump.
Think about that just a moment because on Saturday I reported on
the fact that sources have claimed that former FBI attorney Lisa Page has begun
to testify under oath that there was absolutely no basis for the Mueller
investigation into Trump. In that report, I referenced John
Solomon's claim that:
For any American who wants an
answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive
texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.
That passage was transmitted on
May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.
The date of the text long has
intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosensteinnamed special counselRobert Mueller to
oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia
campaign.
Since the text was turned over
to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against
the Trump campaign.
This month, they finally got the
chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door
interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that
the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to
multiple eyewitnesses.
The admission is deeply
consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a
special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials,
driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”
Strassel continues:
The CIA director couldn’t himself
go public with his Clinton spin—he lacked the support of the intelligence
community and had to be careful not to be seen interfering in U.S. politics. So
what to do? He called Harry Reid. In a late August briefing, he told the Senate
minority leader that Russia was trying to help Mr. Trump win the election, and that
Trump advisers might be colluding with Russia. (Two years later, no public
evidence has emerged to support such a claim.)
But the truth was irrelevant. On
cue, within a few days of the briefing, Mr. Reid wrote a letter to Mr. Comey,
which of course immediately became public. “The evidence of a direct connection
between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign
continues to mount,” wrote Mr. Reid, going on to float Team Clinton’s
Russians-are-helping-Trump theory. Mr. Reid publicly divulged at least one of
the allegations contained in the infamous Steele dossier, insisting that the
FBI use “every resource available to investigate this matter.”
The Reid letter marked the first
official blast of the Brennan-Clinton collusion narrative into the open.
Clinton opposition-research firm Fusion GPS followed up by briefing its media
allies about the dossier it had dropped off at the FBI. On Sept. 23, Yahoo
News’s Michael Isikoff ran the headline: “U.S. intel officials probe ties
between Trump adviser and Kremlin.” Voilà . Not only was the collusion narrative
out there, but so was evidence that the FBI was investigating.
In their recent book “Russian Roulette,” Mr. Isikoff and David Corn say
even Mr. Reid believed Mr. Brennan had an “ulterior motive” with the briefing,
and “concluded the CIA chief believed the public needed to know about the
Russia operation, including the information about the possible links to the
Trump campaign.” (Brennan allies have denied his aim was to leak damaging
information.)
Clinton supporters have a plausible
case that Mr. Comey’s late-October announcement that the FBI had reopened its
investigation into the candidate affected the election. But Trump supporters
have a claim that the public outing of the collusion narrative and FBI
investigation took a toll on their candidate. Politics was at the center of
that outing, and Mr. Brennan was a ringmaster. Remember that when reading his
next “treason” tweet.
When men like John Brennan point their finger at others and
cry "treason," they are attempting to pin the very crime they are
guilty of on someone else. Ms. Strassel, while not being as forthright as
Gorka about Brennan's treason, nevertheless, seems to be saying just that in
what she wrote. America would do well to listen and bring justice to bear
upon this traitor and the traitors surrounding him, but I have my doubts that
anyone in this life will actually hold him accountable.
Caroline Glick has written an outstanding essay relating to
former Obama comrades, Dems and the Leftist MSM are losing their minds on who can
accuse President Trump louder of treason. In wondering who was more actually
treasonous, Glick goes on to list Obama actions that actually benefitted
Russian National Interests.
Did US President Donald Trump commit treason in Helsinki
when he met Monday with Russian President Vladimir Putin? Should he be
impeached?
That is what his opponents claim. Former president Barack
Obama’s CIA director John Brennan accused Trump of treason outright.
Brennan tweeted, “Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki [with
Putin] rises to and exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors.’ It
was nothing short of treasonous.”
Fellow senior Obama administration officials, including
former FBI director James Comey, former defense secretary Ashton Carter, and
former deputy attorney general Sally Yates parroted Brennan’s accusation.
Almost the entire US media joined them in condemning Trump
for treason.
Democratic leaders have led their own charge. Democratic
Congressman Steve Cohen from Tennessee insinuated the US military should
overthrow the president, tweeting, “Where are our military folks? The
Commander-in-Chief is in the hands of our enemy!”
Senate minority leader Charles Schumer said that Trump is
controlled by Russia. And Trump’s Republican opponents led by senators Jeff
Flake and John McCain attacked him as well.
Trump allegedly committed treason when he refused to reject
Putin’s denial of Russian interference in the US elections in 2016 and was
diffident in relation to the US intelligence community’s determination that
Russia did interfere in the elections.
Trump walked back his statement from Helsinki at a press
appearance at the White House Tuesday. But it is still difficult to understand
what all the hullaballoo about the initial statement was about.
AP reporter John Lemire placed Trump in an impossible
position. Noting that Putin denied meddling in the 2016 elections and the
intelligence community insists that Russia meddled, he asked Trump, “Who do you
believe?”
If Trump had said that he believed his intelligence
community and gave no credence to Putin’s denial, he would have humiliated
Putin and destroyed any prospect of cooperative relations.
Trump tried to strike a balance. He spoke respectfully of
both Putin’s denials and the US intelligence community’s accusation. It wasn’t
a particularly coherent position. It was a clumsy attempt to preserve the
agreements he and Putin reached during their meeting.
And it was blindingly obviously not treason.
In fact, Trump’s response to Lemire, and his overall conduct
at the press conference, did not convey weakness at all. Certainly he was far
more assertive of US interests than Obama was in his dealings with Russia.
In Obama’s first summit with Putin in July 2009, Obama sat
meekly as Putin delivered an hour-long lecture about how US-Russian relations
had gone down the drain.
As Daniel Greenfield noted at Frontpage magazine
Tuesday, in succeeding years, Obama capitulated to Putin on anti-missile
defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic, on Ukraine, Georgia and
Crimea. Obama gave Putin free rein in Syria and supported Russia’s alliance
with Iran on its nuclear program and its efforts to save the Assad regime. He
permitted Russian entities linked to the Kremlin to purchase a quarter of
American uranium. And of course, Obama made no effort to end Russian meddling
in the 2016 elections.
TRUMP IN contrast has stiffened US sanctions against Russian
entities. He has withdrawn from Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran. He has agreed
to sell Patriot missiles to Poland. And he has placed tariffs on Russian
exports to the US.
So if Trump is Putin’s agent, what was Obama? [Bold text
Blog Editor’s]
Given the nature of Trump’s record, and the context in which
he made his comments about Russian meddling in the 2016 elections, the question
isn’t whether he did anything wrong. The question is why are his opponents
accusing him of treason for behaving as one would expect a president to behave?
What is going on?
The answer to that is clear enough. Brennan signaled it
explicitly when he tweeted that Trump’s statements “exceed the threshold of ‘high
crimes and misdemeanors.’” The unhinged allegations of treason are supposed to
form the basis of impeachment hearings.
The Democrats and their allies in the media use the
accusation that Trump is an agent of Russia as an elections strategy. Midterm elections
are consistently marked with low voter turnout. So both parties devote most of
their energies to rallying their base and motivating their most committed
members to vote.
To objective observers, the allegation that Trump betrayed
the United States by equivocating in response to a rude question about Russian
election interference is ridiculous on its face. But Democratic election
strategists have obviously concluded that it is catnip for the Democratic
faithful. For them it serves as a dog whistle.
The promise of impeachment for votes is too radical to serve
as an official campaign strategy. For the purpose of attracting swing voters
and not scaring moderate Democrats away from the party and the polls,
Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer say they have no interest in
impeaching Trump. Impeachment talk, they insist, is a mere distraction.
But by embracing Brennan’s claim of treason, Pelosi, Hoyer,
Schumer and other top Democrats are winking and nodding to the progressive
radicals now rising in their party. They are telling the Linda Sarsours and
Cynthia Nixons of the party that they will impeach Trump if they win control of
the House of Representatives.
The problem with playing domestic politics on the
international scene is that doing so has real consequences for international
security and for US national interests.
Consider, for instance, Europe’s treatment of Trump.
Europe is economically dependent on trade with the US and
strategically dependent on NATO. So why are the Europeans so open about their
hatred of Trump and their rejection of his trade policies, his policy towards
Iran and his insistence that they pay their fair share for their own defense?
Why did EU Council President Donald Tusk attack Trump with
such contempt and condescension in Brussels? Tusk, who chairs the meetings of
EU leaders, is effectively the EU president. And the day before last week’s
NATO conference he chided Trump for criticizing Europe’s low defense spending.
“America,” he said with a voice dripping with contempt,
“appreciate your allies. After all you don’t have that many.”
That of course, was news to the countries of Asia, Africa,
Latin America, Europe and the Middle East that depend on America and work
diligently to develop and maintain strong ties to Washington.
Leaving aside the ridiculousness of his remarks, where did
Tusk get the idea that it is reasonable to speak so scornfully to an American
president?
Where did EU’s foreign policy commissioner Federica
Mogherini get the idea that it is okay for her to work urgently and openly to
undermine legally constituted US sanctions against Iran for its illicit nuclear
weapons program?
The answer of course is that they got a green light to adopt
openly anti-American policies from the forces in the US that have devoted their
energies since Trump’s election nearly two years ago to delegitimizing his
victory and his presidency. Those calling Trump a traitor empowered the
Europeans to defy the US on every issue.
Trump’s opponents’ unsubstantiated allegation that his
campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 elections has constrained Trump’s
ability to perform his duties.
Consider his relations with Putin.
If there is anything to criticize about Trump’s summit with
Putin it is that it came too late. It should have happened a year ago. That it
happened this week speaks not to Trump’s eagerness to meet Putin but to the
urgency of the hour.
After securing control over the Deraa province along Syria’s
border with Jordan last week, the Assad regime, supported by Iranian regime
forces, Hezbollah forces and Shiite militia forces began its campaign to
restore regime control over the Quneitra province along the Syrian border with
Israel.
As Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and all government and
military officials have stated clearly and consistently for years, Israel
cannot accept Iranian presence in Syria. If Iran does not remove its forces
from Syria generally and from southern Syria specifically, there will be war
imminently between Israel, Iran and its Hezbollah, Shiite militia and Syrian
regime allies.
Israel prefers to fight that war sooner rather than later to
prevent Iran and its allies from entrenching their positions in Syria and make
victory more difficult. So, in the interest of preventing such a war, Trump had
no choice but to bite the political bullet and sit down to discuss Syria face
to face with Putin to try to come up with a deal that would see Russia push
Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.
From what the two leaders said at their joint press conference
it’s hard to know what was agreed to. But Netanyahu’s jubilant response
indicates that some deal was reached.
Certainly their statements were strong, unequivocal signals
to Iran. When Trump said, “The United States will not allow Iran to benefit
from our successful campaign against ISIS,” he signaled strongly that US forces
in eastern Syria will support Israel in a war against Iran and its allied
forces in Syria just as it fought with the Kurds and its other allies in Syria
against ISIS.
When Putin endorsed Israel’s position that the 1974
Syrian-Israeli disengagement agreement must be implemented along the border, he
told the Iranians that in any Iranian-Israeli war in Syria, Putin will not side
with Iran.
Time will tell if we just averted war. But what we did learn
is that Israel’s position in a war with Iran is stronger than it could have
been if the two leaders hadn’t met in Helsinki.
And this is exceedingly important.
Trump is being condemned for adopting a conciliatory tone
towards Putin while employing a combative tone towards the Europeans and
particularly Germany at the NATO summit. This criticism ignores how Trump
operates in the international arena.
Trump views his exchanges with foreign leaders as separate
engagements. He has goals he wishes to advance with China; with North Korea;
with Russia; with Canada; with Mexico; with Europe; with Britain; with US Arab
allies. In each separate engagement, Trump employs a combination of carrots and
sticks. In each engagement he adopts a distinct manner that he believes
advances his goals.
So far, unlike Obama’s foreign policy by this point in his
presidency, none of Trump’s exchanges have brought disaster on America or its
allies. To the contrary, America and its allies have much greater strategic maneuver
room across a wide spectrum of threats and joint adversaries than they had when
Obama left office.
Trump’s opponents’ obsession with bringing him down has
caused great harm to his presidency and to America’s position worldwide. It is
a testament to Trump’s commitment to the US and its allies that he met with
Putin this week. And the success of their meeting is something that all who
care about global security and preventing a devastating war in the Middle East
should be grateful for.
Caroline
B. Glick is a senior columnist at Breitbart News and the senior contributing
and chief columnist for The Jerusalem Post. She is also a senior columnist for
Maariv. She is the author of The Israeli Solution: A One State Plan for Peace
in the Middle East, (Crown 2014) and of Shackled Warrior: Israel and the Global
Jihad (Gefen 2008). The Israeli Solution was endorsed by leading US
policymakers including Vice President Mike Pence, Senator Ted Cruz and National
Security Advisor John Bolton. Shackled Warrior was endorsed by Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu and former CIA director James Woolsey.
Glick
is the adjunct senior fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Center for
Security Policy in Washington, DC and directs the Israeli Security Project at
the David Horowitz Freedom Center. She travels frequently throughout the world
to brief policymakers on issues related to Israel’s strategic environment and
other related topics. She lectures widely on strategic and political issues
affecting global security, Israel and the Jewish people, US-Israel relations,
Israel-Diaspora affairs and Israel’s changing strategic landscape.
In
2008 Glick founded Latma, the Hebrew language satirical media criticism
website. She served as editor in chief of the site until it ceased operations
in 2015.
Latma
changed the face of Israel’s social media and revolutionized the Israeli
entertainment industry by bringing an alternative voice to the popular culture.
Latma launched “Hakol Shafit,” a primetime, half hour satirical newscast on
Israel television Channel 1. Glick served as the editor in chief of the
program.
Glick
was born in Houston, TX and grew up in Chicago, IL. She moved to Israel in
1991, two weeks after receiving her BA in Political Science from Columbia
University. She joined the Israel Defense Forces that summer and served as an
officer for five and a half years.
From
1994-1996, as an IDF captain, Ms. Glick served in the Defense Ministry as a
core member of Israel’s negotiating team with the Palestinians.
In
1997 and 1998 Ms. Glick served as Assistant Foreign Policy Advisor to Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.
From
1998-2000 Ms. Glick studied at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of
Government and received a Master’s in Public Policy in June 2000.
In
the summer of 2000 Ms. Glick returned to Israel and began … READ THE REST
William LaSalle posted a huge comment to my share at the G+
Community Truth Warriors. Google flagged it as spam with these loving
words from the social platform masters: “Removed as spam and only visible
to you”.
I thought, “Well that is annoying.” I began reading LaSalle’s
post.
The LaSalle comment was huge which might have contributed to
Google flagging as spam.
As (or if) you read the comment, LaSalle comes off as an
angry person ranting about the state of affairs left for America by one of the
most Presidential Administrations in U.S. history. The thing is LaSalle backs
his rant with admittedly Conservative sourced links, yet he includes some links
that are from the Left MSM.
AND I made the post even longer by adding some excerpts to most
of those standalone source links for better context.
I might add I concur with 95% of LaSalle’s rants but not
all. LaSalle has several paragraph-lists of nefarious individuals and
organizations in which some overlap, one example:
The M.O. of George Soros, Barack
Obama, Muslims, the Roman Catholic Church, Organized Crime, the
United Nations, Obama's Administration, Liberals, Socialists and Communists,
and Hilary Clinton is the same.
I point the “Roman Catholic Church” in bold/italicized text.
As huge as the comment is, his inclusion of the Catholics as nefarious actors
is not sourced. This leads me to believe a bit of personal animus against
Catholics which is not an uncommon issue even among good moral upstanding
Protestants (as opposed to a hate group).
I am a Protestant/Charismatic/Word-of-Faith Christian. Being
in this crowd I have received share of animus from Mainstream Protestants and
Catholic in Denominational Christianity.
The irony of LaSalle’s animus toward Catholics is he is
commenting to a post that showed my displeasure of Jew-Hating Muslims promoting
the proven forgery/hoax document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as legit.
Those that have animus toward Catholics have some legit
gripes with Catholic Dogma, such as: Papal Infallibility, encouraging prayers
to angels and canonized saints and so on.
The reality is that devout Catholics have the same Conservative
Family values as Biblical-minded Protestants. Today’s modern world has both
Catholics and Protestants that have eschewed the Bible as God’s Word to
Believers. These watered down diluted Catholics and protestants are worthy of
criticism but not animus. Well, that’s my two-cents on the Catholics.
You might want to bookmark William LaSalle’s comment
enabling to return to where you left off if you need a break from reading this
book of frustration of virus of Leftists polluting the U.S. Government and the
Constitution of the United States of America.
Comment Marked as Spam by Google awaiting Moderator/Owner
Final Decision
The Traitors Hillary and Barry and the criminal,
socialist, radical Islamic Terrorist supporting Democrats.
More than 11,000 private messages from Julian Assange reveal
the WikiLeaks founder believed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a
“well connected, sadistic sociopath.”
On November 19, 2015, Assange said: “Her role in the war in Libya is what
should bring her down, however, the GOP is too close to others who have
benefitted to exploit this, it seems. that Hillary helped to sew the foundation
for ISIS against Pentagon generals’ advice seems huge. But the GOP resolutely
ignores it.
Our CIA and FBI have no credibility because from 2008 through 2016 they were on
the wrong side.
Robert Mueller and Huma Mahmood Abedin should be a FBI paid
Informants, to escape charges of Treason and working against the Government of
the United States, on the Treason of Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama and his
Administration on the Uranium One Deal and the Election Tampering by George
Soros and his NGO's and the Nations with Islamic Law in 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions this
week raised the possibility that a special counsel may be appointed to
investigate potential wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation, specifically
suggestions that a U.S. government panel approved the sale of a large uranium
firm to Russian interests in exchange for donations to the foundation.
The so-called Uranium One deal has
been a focus of conservative media and President Donald Trump, who has
repeatedly asked on Twitter why the DOJ is not actively investigating the
matter.
What is the Uranium One deal?
The deal in question involves the
sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining interests in the U.S. to
Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy agency. The sale occurred in stages, beginning
in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued
in 2010, when the Russian agency took ownership of a 51 percent share of the
company. In 2013, a third transaction gave Rosatom full ownership of Uranium
One.
With its purchase of Uranium One,
Rosatom assumed control of roughly 20 percent of uranium production capacity in
the U.S. The current licenses issued to Rosatom’s U.S. subsidiaries, issued by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prohibit the company from exporting uranium
outside the country, according to OilPrice.com.
…
What are the allegations of
wrongdoing?
Controversy surrounding the deal
largely pertains to 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who
was secretary of state in 2010 when the State Department signed off on
Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One. Several of Uranium One’s owners were also
donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable
foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to
appease donors to her family’s charity.
Connections between Clinton
Foundation donors and Uranium One were first published in 2015 by The New York Times,
which based its reporting in part on the book “Clinton Cash,” by Breitbart News
senior editor-at-large Peter Schweizer.
The allegations resurfaced last
October, when The Hill reported
that the FBI was investigating Kremlin “bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the
United States.”
"If [Rosenstein] had any sort
of moral compass, he would shut down Mueller's corrupt witch hunt immediately.
Why he doesn't see it is beyond anything I could ever think about."
Sean Hannity weighed in on Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein's testimony today, in which he stood by Special Counsel Robert
Mueller's Russia probe. http://fxn.ws/2ATMpCi
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Ignorance of all the laws regarding Classified Information
is not a permit to break the Law to anyone other than Liberal Socialist
Democrat Politicians.
The crazy Socialist Democrats really need to cut their losses and toss Bill and
Hilary and Obama under the bus.
The failure of our Federal Agencies to Arrest Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton
for Treason is proof of the Corruption of our Federal Agencies.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton's support and praise of the Convicted
Terrorist Mohammed Morsi, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Terrorists, the Terrorists
in Iraq and Syria, the Terrorists in Palestine, the nation of Iran which
created and funds the Terrorist Group Hezbollah, working to achieve Diplomatic
Relations with the Communist Terrorist Supporting nation of Cuba, working with
the United States in their support of Islam and the destruction of our Human
Rights and Freedoms, and the Socialists' attack on our Second Amendment,
Freedom of the Press, and our Freedom of Speech was Treason and continues to be
Treason today.
Having Socialist Democrats, radical Islamic Terrorist Groups like CAIR, the
Muslim Brotherhood, the Hamas, the New Black Panthers, and the Black Lives
Matter Movement support the Democrats in their Treason does not make it better
or legal.
The Treason of our Federal Judges, Department of Homeland Security, FBI, CIA,
and our other Federal Agencies and their failure to protect the citizens of the
United States from Terrorism is proof of the corruption in our Government and
our Federal Agencies.
Sanctuary Cities harbor Criminals guilty of Entering the United States
Illegally, Gang Members, rapists, murderers, and Terrorists.
The lying Bitch, the Liberals and Democrats, and the emails.
Investigate Hilary, Bill, the DNC, the Black Lives Matter Movement, the Hamas,
CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, George Soros and his Foundations, and the Clinton
Foundation and their Criminal Enterprise and their involvement with Terrorists,
Activists, and Election 2016.
There is not a statute of limitations on Murder or Treason.
The nations with Islamic Law, George Soros and the Communists, Barack Obama's
and the crazy Socialists' Democrat's choice, the Witch - pure evil.
An e-mail written by Huma Abedin to
her brother allegedly reveals that she is a radical Muslim plant waiting to
take over the country after Hillary Clinton is elected. However, there is no
evidence to back that report being circulated on social media. It does sound
like an exciting storyline to Homeland or 24. The report comes from an image
containing the text of an email purportedly written by Clinton’s longtime aide
Huma Abedin to her brother Hassan which then began circulating via Facebook and
Twitter.
On September 03, 2016 at 8:57 PM, humamabedin@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry for my late reply, Hassan, yes, let me tell you about Her. The woman is
so odd, so starved for validation, so tormented and vain it is a constant
surprise to me anyone takes her seriously. Everyone on the team knows how
unwell she is but they’re more determined than ever to see her win. This woman
has a dozen seizures a day. This godless shrieking malcontent passed out in her
medical van.
This walking cadaver.
She’s nonfunctional, Hassan, nobody cares.
We sober her up for speeches and indulge the press corps with cheap sentiment.
The first female president.
The last glass ceiling, etc.
They trip over themselves lining up behind her.
Surely they know it’s not Her they’re getting, it’s the one in the corner, the
quiet helper, your sister Huma.
You asked me once how I did it. How did I take the castle? Hassan, I didn’t
take it, they gave it to me.
Yes, there was a cost, I will admit, subjecting myself to men like AW and WJC
is mortal torture.
But I do it gladly, brother, everything they ask of me, however sick and
depraved, I do it and I smile, rejoicing at the thought of whose glory I serve.
Who says Huma is a spy?
Huma.
Sensitive information is released in a need to know basis not spammed to all
your friends in the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Group.
There is not a Statute of Limitations on Treason, Kidnapping, and Murder.
Asked press briefing whether Obama had considered utilizing his unique
executive power, press secretary Josh Earnest was cryptic.
“The president has offered clemency to a substantial number of Americans who
were previously serving time in federal prisons,” Earnest said.
In Obama's Pardon is he going to document all of Hilary Clintons' Crimes?
Why can't anyone remember who Hillary’s girlfriend, the Muslim Brotherhood
Terrorist Spy is ?
In the midst of the welter of charges
and counter charges that may or may not sink the national nervous breakdown
that is the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, it's worth examining
who exactly is Huma Abedin and how bizarre it is that such a person ever could
be the closest confidante of the woman who would be our first female president.
This is not to say that Huma
Abedin is any Alger Hiss,
but she is, if anything, far more intimately involved with the Muslim
Brotherhood than Hiss ever was with the Communist Party. And she was—at least
until now—potentially more powerful than Hiss.
Huma is literally the child of the
Brotherhood. Both her deceased father and living mother (with whom she is
in some reports currently ensconced) were intellectual leaders of the
organization, if you can call it intellectual. Mostly, it's pure bigotry. Andrew McCarthy sums
it up:
Sorry to interrupt the Best
Enabler of a Sociopath Award ceremony but, to recap, Ms. Abedin worked for many
years at a journal that promotes Islamic-supremacist ideology that was founded
by a top al-Qaeda financier, Abdullah Omar Naseef. Naseef ran the Rabita Trust,
a formally designated foreign terrorist organization under American law. Ms.
Abedin and Naseef overlapped at the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA)
for at least seven years.
Throughout that time
(1996–2003), Ms. Abdein [sic] worked for Hillary Clinton in various capacities.
Ms. Abedin’s late father, Dr. Zyed Abedin, was recruited by Naseef to run the
JMMA in Saudi Arabia. The journal was operated under the management of the
World Assembly of Muslim Youth, a virulently anti-Semitic and sharia-supremacist
organization. When Dr. Abedin died, editorial control of the journal passed to
his wife, Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin — Huma’s mother.
… nor should it be news that the
Muslim Brotherhood is mother and father of al Qaeda and therefore ISIS. Nor, at
this point, alas, is it astonishing that Obama and Hillary cozied up to Egypt's
Morsi … READ THE REST
The FBI announced on Friday that
they would be reopening their investigation into Hillary Clinton and her
private email server. However, after some new information has come to light
many theories are beginning to make their way across the web indicating that
this whole situation may be much worse than we originally had thought.
…
… The prominent theories are
pointing in the direction that many high-ranking officials including President
Obama himself may be directly involved in Hillary's massive scandal.
…
So it would seem that Obama and many
other guilty parties may be involved may have had to do the only thing that
they could do, use Hillary as a perfect scapegoat and pin the whole thing on
her. At least if she is the center of attention, then most people won't even
pay attention to his role in the scandal.
…
Obama may be able to take down
Hillary and this would be a huge victory for all Americans, but for justice to
truly be served all … READ
ENTIRETY
When you get caught doing something start screaming your opponents are doing
it.
That has always been the Clinton's MO.
It is surprising Hilary is not accusing Trump of working with radical Islamic
Terrorists.
I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, declare under penalty of perjury that the following
is true and correct:
While I do not know what information may be “responsive” for purposes of this
law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially
were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on
information and belief, this has been done.
As a result of my directive, approximately 55,000 pages of these emails were
produced to the Department on December 5, 2014.
Huma Abedin did have such an account which was used at times for government
business.
Liberals Suck.
Judicial
Watch: New Clinton Emails Reveal Clinton Knew about Security Risk of
Private Blackberry, Avoided Use of Secure Phone
MAY 12, 2016
(Washington, DC) – Judicial
Watch today released 296
pages of new State Department documents, including a February
27, 2009, email in which the former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton apologized to health care activist/physician Mark Hyman for failing to
respond to a message because, “no blackberry contact permitted in my office.”
The new documents also contain
a February
22, 2009, email exchange between Clinton and her then-Chief of
Staff Cheryl Mills, trying to communicate over a secure line after Clinton
returned from a trip (evidently
to Asia). Unable to set up a secure communication, Clinton told
Mills, “I called ops and they gave me your ‘secure’ cells… but only got a
high-pitched whining sound.” When Mills suggested that Clinton try the
secure line again, the former secretary wrote back, “I give up. Call me
on my home #.”
The previously unreleased Clinton
emails date back as far as January
2009 and further contradict statements by Hillary Clinton
that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to
the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system
until March
18, 2009. The new Clinton emails cover topics such as … READ
THE REST
Clinton abandoned secure line to use home phone, new email shows.
New emails released by a
conservative watchdog group on Thursday appear to show former Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton directing
a top aide to call her via an unsecured phone line when technical troubles
prevented a secure phone conversation.
“I give up. Call me on my home
[number],” Clinton told then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills in a February 2009 email after
more than an hour of trouble trying to communicate via a secure line.
What is more insecure than Hilary's Private Server, her home
phone.
Our leaders that can support people like Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, and
Bernie Sanders have made so many compromises to get along with radical Islamic
Terrorists and the nations with Islamic Law and their child abuse, abuse of
women, torture, rape, murder, Terrorism, and war and their complete lack of
respect for children, women, anyone with any religion other than Islam, Human
Rights, Freedom, and Truth, that they have no morals, values, and no respect
for anyone or anything.
No surprise to us, Hillary lied, under oath, again.
Who vetted the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorists' spy Huma ?
Iran is no different from Syria, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Turkey, Iraq, Qatar, or
any damn nation with Islamic Law. They place no value on Human Life, Human
Rights, or Freedom.
President al-Sisi who has defined
the enemy as “Islamic” and the inherent problem with Islam to the clerics in a
speech this past January.
It is President al-Sisi who has taken the fight to the MB as well as al-Qaida
in the Sinai Peninsula.
It has been President al-Sisi who has cut off border crossings and support to
Hamas — which is the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Group.
“Egypt’s former president Mohamed Morsi has been sentenced to 20 years in
prison over the killing of demonstrators outside his palace in 2012, the first
verdict to be issued against the country’s first freely elected leader. Morsi,
the Barack Obama of Egypt.
Our Drone and Covert Wars are war crimes. Why are we almost at war with Russia?
For the same reason we are at war in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, the CIA,
George Soros, and Obama want it.
I cannot imagine why anyone cannot see NATO, the EU, the United Nations, George
Soros and his NGO's, our National Endowment for Democracy, our CIA, the United
States Administration, our current guys in our Justice System and Federal
Agencies, and our current Senate and House are the problem and they are what is
pushing the world toward World War 3.
George Soros, the EU, and our CIA were responsible for the mess in the Ukraine.
The Sanctions against Russia should end.
Damn our Media, Liberals, Communists, Democrats, and Muslims.
Arrest Barack Obama, George Soros, Hilary Clinton, Joe Biden, John McCain, and
John Kerry for financing and supporting Terrorism and ship them to GITMO.
The Wicked had best enjoy these fleeting days they walk the earth, it is all
they will know. They and their deeds will be one day forgotten. The wages of
sin is death, their days on this earth is all they will know.
The Clinton's and the Felons. It is only the news. George Soros and the
Clinton's, the Biggest Crime Family in the World.
The Clinton's and the Felons.
One thing keeps coming back to bite the criminals like Bill
Clinton, George Soros, Hilary Clinton, Valerie Jarrett, Barack Obama, Angela
Merkel, Louis Farrakhan, John Kerry, John McCain, and the leaders of the United
Nations and the EU in the ass.
The truth.
The M.O. of George Soros, Barack Obama, Muslims, the
Roman Catholic Church, Organized Crime, the United Nations, Obama's
Administration, Liberals, Socialists and Communists, and Hilary Clinton is the
same.
The Blame Game, pick someone to blame before you start your criminal
enterprise.
Why are Muslims always saying everyone hates them?
Everyone hates their Child Abuse, Abuse of Women, torture, rape, murder, Terrorism,
and war.
Who is the first person screaming I didn't do it?
The Rat Fink who did it.
BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON CONVICTS LIST [Blog Editor: List seems to be
derived from HERE.
A similar List HERE]
Neil Ainley (guilty plea)
Roger Altman (resigned under cloud)
Arapaho/Cheyenne Indians (5th plea)
Les Aspin (resigned in disgust)
Bruce Babbitt (under IC investigation)
Zoe Baird (nomination failed)
Robert Bennett (co-defendant in sexual harassment suit)
Ronald H. Blackley (convicted - Espy)
Herby Branscum (mistrial), Michael A. Brown (convicted),
Michael's dad Ron Brown (died under investigation),
Jorge Cabrera (convicted)
Pierre Chambrin (WH chef, fired & bribed $37k to keep quiet)
Gin F. J. Chen (5th plea), Ming Chen (fled country)
Yi Chu (5th plea - granted immunity)
Yue Chu (5th plea - granted immunity)
Johnny Chung (guilty plea)
Henry Cisneros (indicted), Arthur Coia (under investigation), Gilbert Colon
(5th plea), Bettie Currie (subpoenaed), Billy Dale (persecuted by Clintons,
acquitted), Michael deVegter (indicted), Richard Douglas (guilty plea - Espy),
Joycelyn Elders (idiot), Mike Espy (indicted), Eugene Fitzhugh (guilty plea),
Dr. Henry Foster Jr. (nomination failed), Manlin Foung (5th plea - granted
immunity), Yogesh Ghandi (5th plea), Lani Guinier (nomination failed), David
Hale (guilty plea), John Haley (indicted-fraud), Jean Hanson (resigned under
cloud), Alexis Herman (under investigation), Philip B. Heymann (resigned in
disgust), Nolanda S. Hill (indicted - singing), Robert Hill (mistrial), Man Ho
(5th plea - granted immunity), Maria Hsia (indicted), Jie Su Hsiao (5th plea),
Judy Hsu (5th plea), Jen Chin Hsueh (5th plea), Hueutsan Huang (5th plea -
granted immunity), Jane Huang (5th plea), John Huang (5th plea), Zie Pan Huang
(5th plea - granted immunity), Webster Hubbell (convicted), Steven Hwang (5th
plea), Woody Hwang (5th plea), Harold Ickes (under IC investigation), Bobby Ray
Inman (nomination failed), Charles Intriago (5th plea), Bin Yueh Jeng (5th
plea), Mark Jimenez (5th plea), Linda Jones (guilty plea - Cisneros), M. Samuel
Jones III (bimbo patrol), Vernon Jordan (subpoenaed), Pauline Kanchanalak (fled
country), Duangnet Kronenberg (5th plea), Larry Kuca (guilty plea), Joseph
Landon (5th plea - granted immunity), Nathan Landow (under IC investigation),
Dan Lasater (convicted), Kent Law (granted immunity), John H.K. Lee (fled
country), Na-chi "Nancy" Lee (5th plea - granted immunity), Marcia
Lewis (subpoenaed), Siuw Moi Lian (5th plea - granted immunity), Hsiu Chu Lin
(5th plea), Mike Lin (5th plea), Bruce Lindsey (unindicted co-conspirator),
Craig Livingstone (resigned under cloud), Nora and Gene Lum (guilty pleas),
daughter Trisha Lum (guilty plea), Felix Ma (fled country), Maria Mapili (5th
plea), William Marks (guilty plea), Charles Matthews (guilty plea), Terence
McAuliffe (guilty plea), James McDougal (convicted, died in prison), Susan
McDougal (convicted), Mark Middleton (5th plea), Dick Morris (resigned under
cloud), Jere Nash (guilty plea - Teamsters), Tom Nastos (under investigation),
Bernard Nussbaum (under IC investigation), Hazel O'Leary (junket queen), Seow
Fong Ooi (5th plea), Robert Palmer (guilty plea), Antonio Pan (fled country),
Larry Patterson (co-defendant), Federico Pena, Roger Perry, (No "Q"
yet), Charles Ruff (under investigation), Archie Schaffer (indicted - Tyson),
Agus Setiawan (fled country), Jou Sheng (5th plea), Hsin Chen Shih (5th plea),
Man Ya Shih (5th plea - granted immunity), Ted Sieong (fled country), Smith
Barney Inc. ($1M civil fine - Espy), Stephen Smith (guilty plea), Joshua
Steiner (lied to diary), Jane Dewi Tahir (5th plea), Roger Tamraz (fugitive -
Lebanese embezzlement), Subandi Tanuwidjaja (fled country), Dewi Tirto (fled
country), Susan Thomases (under IC investigation), Charlie Trie (indicted),
Linda Tripp, Hsiu Luan Tseng (5th plea), Jim Guy Tucker (convicted), Tyson
Foods Inc. (guilty plea - Espy), (No "U" or "V" yet), Chris
Wade (guilty plea), Chi Rung Wang (5th plea), David Wang (5th plea - granted
immunity), Seth Ward (under IC investigation), David Watson (fired), Clifton
Wharton (resigned in disgust), Jack L. Williams (convicted - Tyson), Maggie
Williams (under IC investigation), Arief Wiriandinata (fled country), Soraya
Wiriadinata (fled country), Larry Wong (5th plea - granted immunity), Michael
Woo (under investigation), Kimba Wood (nomination failed), Irene Wu (5th plea -
granted immunity), Shu Jen Wu (5th plea - granted immunity), Eric Wynn
(convicted), (No "X," yet), Yumei Yang (5th plea), Keshi Zhan (5th
plea - granted immunity)
If you don't show up to vote in
Chicago, don't worry. They will mark you down as voting a straight
Democratic ticket, just like your dead uncle is voting. That is how these
sleaze bags get elected. A well funded ACORN in Cook County guarantees the
elections are still fixed.
When Saddam Hussein was removed
from power, Chicago became the new "most corrupt" city in the
world. This is where Barack Obama lives and below are many of his friends
and acquaintances. Some of them can be found in local prisons, others just
belong there. … READ
THE REST
Never admit to anything.
Never accept responsibility.
Attack anyone who disagrees with you.
Hillary Clinton used the IRS against any of her enemies, like Paula Jones. The
Clinton's use of the IRS and other Federal Agencies and Private Investigators
against the victims of Bill Clinton's sexual victims was a horrible thing. She
terrorized the victims of Bill Clinton to silence them.
The Clinton M.O. is to harass and use any means to hurt, ruin, and destroy any
of their enemies. Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, and Barack Obama is just as
good or better at using the IRS and Federal Agencies to harass their enemies.
Norman Hsu's ponzi scheme.
Johnny Chung's illegal Chinese Indolence money.
120 people fled the country or were arrested in Hillary
Clinton's illegal campaign funding.
The Chinese immigrants who donated to the Hillary Campaign did not exist.
Hillary Clinton was involved in the largest campaign finance fraud ever
created. Peter Paul, Hillary Clinton, and Aaron Tonken. 2000 Senate Campaign.
A fund-raiser for Hillary
Clinton triggered events that contributed to the Web firm's collapse. In the
fallout, several may face prison terms.
By Michael Cieply and James
Bates, [LA] Times Staff Writers
One, for $63,788.48, went to
Wolfgang Puck's restaurant Spago, for catering. Another, for $12,800, paid
Rogers & Cowan for publicity. Yet another, for $30,048.31, covered a
private jet trip for Cher.
The money came from brokerage accounts in the Century City office of Merrill
Lynch & Co. and was to fund what became a cornerstone event during the week
of the August 2000 Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles â€" an
A-list Hollywood gala honoring outgoing President Clinton that raised $1 million
for First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's fledging New York Senate campaign.
Gordon was right-hand man to
entrepreneur Peter Paul, who provided the money by borrowing against Merrill
Lynch margin accounts secured by more than 1 million shares in Stan Lee
Media Inc. Gordon was then Stan Lee Media's executive vice president
in charge of operations, and Paul, officially a consultant to the company, was
its co-founder.
This was New Economy money: Stan Lee Media had never turned a profit. It had
value thanks to the dot-com bubble and the reputation of its namesake chairman,
comic book genius Stan Lee.
With startling speed, the money disappeared into the hungry maw of a political
venture that was growing more expensive by the minute. Ultimately, the checks
written that summer would contribute to Stan Lee Media's collapse and help
trigger a sequence of events that may lead to a prison sentence for Gordon.
They also sparked the interest of prosecutors investigating how a young,
little-known Los Angeles fund-raiser, Aaron Tonken, now facing criminal charges
in a growing scandal, so …
…
Despite its apparent glitter, the
Clinton gala wasn't a complete success. The event did raise more than $1
million for Hillary Clinton's campaign, in which she defeated Republican Rick
Lazio to become New York's junior senator. But it cost about twice that amount
to throw the party. Many prime seats at the event's exclusive dinner finale,
priced at $25,000 each, were given away, Gordon said, many to Hollywood stars
such as Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston and John Travolta.
…
By the next week, Paul's criminal
past had been made public, the politicians had moved on and the deepening legal
hang-over for Gordon, Paul and others had set in. -READ ENTIRETY
Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies and more lies, that is what you
get with Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama.
First came the Orwellian mash up
YouTube video that portrayed Hillary Rodham Clinton as Big Brother. Then came a
clip of her off-key rendition of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Now, a stinging
13-minute video by a bitter Clinton foe is finding its own Internet audience.
…
Paul is a Hollywood entrepreneur,
former partner of Spider-Man creator Stan Lee and convicted felon who has sued
the Clintons in connection with a celebrity-packed fundraiser he helped
organize for her 2000 Senate race. A California appeals court earlier this
month ruled that Sen. Clinton should be dismissed from the suit. But Paul has
devoted a Web site to the case and has been on tour in recent days showing his
film, “Hillary Uncensored,” at New England College campuses. On Tuesday, he is
scheduled to screen it at the Metropolitan Club in New York City. The Clintons
have long argued that Paul’s criminal record discredits him and in court
pleadings have denied Paul’s claims against them.
…
Robert Hahn and Scott Swett
operate http://www.HillCAP.org[Blog Editor: Today this link
redirects to https://katie.runtnc.net/tr?id=… in which McAfee
WebAdvisor says has high risk] the Web site that Paul set up in
2005 to showcase court documents, videos and news articles related to his
lawsuit. The video trailer “Hillary Uncensored,” and the schedule for the movie
are prominently displayed on the site. Among those featured in the video
speaking in support of Paul is David Schippers, who served as chief
investigative counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during President
Clinton’s 1998 impeachment hearings. In his lawsuit and in the film, Paul says
he spent $1.9 million for the August 2000 Hollywood fundraiser that featured
such stars as Brad Pitt, Diana Ross and Cher. Paul maintains he organized the
event because President Clinton falsely agreed to assist him in a new venture
with Stan Lee after … READ
ENTIRETY
Barack Obama, Al Sharpton, the New Black Panthers, CAIR, the Black Lives Matter
Campaign, and the Nation of Islam are responsible for the Knock Out Games, the
riots, and the violence and Terrorism in the United States.
Islam has never been a religion or the religion of peace.
Islam has spread child abuse, abuse of women, violence, torture, murder, and
war since the day it was created.
In each nation with Islamic Law there are no Human Rights, no Freedom, and no
respect for human life.
Obama's friends in Iran and their Hezbollah, the Hamas and CAIR and the Muslim
Brotherhood support and finance Terrorism all over the world. That is what you
expect of Obama's friends, supporting and financing Terrorism all over the
world.
Not one Damn Incumbent in the United States or you can ignore the truth that
the Koran is evil, Islam is evil, Muslims are evil. You can ignore History,
World War 1, Genocide, the Dark Ages caused by Islam, Islam gave us the Slave
Trade our Fore Fathers had to live with and the Barbary Pirates, and the
radical Islamic Terrorism of Today.
In each nation with Islamic Law there is no Freedom of Speech and no Freedom of
the Press, no Human Rights or Freedoms at all.
Barack Obama's Iran has supported and financed Terrorism all over the world
since before 1980 and created the Hezbollah Terrorist Group.
No deals with the monsters in Iran or the monsters in Qatar, Saudi Arabia,
Egypt, Turkey, Iran, or any nation with Islamic Law and no respect for human
life.
The top guys in Organized Crime do not have as many friends
in Prison or murdered or dead under suspicious circumstances as Hilary and Bill
Clinton.
The news broke last week: an
investigation by Israel’s Shin Bet found that the Gaza organization of World
Vision, the globe’s largest Christian NGO, had been thoroughly
infiltrated by Hamas for a number of years. Since 2005,
Muhammad El-Halabi, the operations manager of World Vision in Gaza, had
funneled more than $7 million per year from the charity to the terrorist group
– and not to the nominally political government of Gaza, but to Hamas’s
so-called “militant wing,” which conducts the terrorist operations.
…
Shin Bet has stressed that World
Vision was unaware of what was going on. But its dossier makes clear that
El-Halabi’s purpose with World Vision was to infiltrate and take advantage of
the aid organization.
…
And that’s one point on which
Americans, especially, will want to take a hard look at this whole
situation. Because it turns out that World Vision, with its
long-established anti-Israel stance, and having been duped for years by a Hamas
operative in charge of the charity’s own activities in Gaza, is not only a
recipient of millions in grants managed by the State Department, but is a
Clinton Foundation partner, a top 100 Clinton Foundation donor, and one of the
dozens of entities that have been Clinton Foundation donors and lobbied
the Hillary Clinton State Department.
…
In 2009, Michael Barker compiled
the following information, in an article at
Swans Commentary, on World Vision officials including “former World Vision
International board member Brady Anderson,” who was Bill Clinton’s ambassador
to Tanzania from 1994 to 1997:
…
Brady Anderson has
also served as the former chair of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
Earlier still he had served as Special Assistant to Governor Bill Clinton (from
1979-81).
Barker noted that an earlier
president of World Vision U.S., Robert Seiple, joined the Clinton
administration after leaving his World Vision position.
From 1987 until 1998, Robert
Seiple was president of World Vision U.S. … After leaving
World Vision in 1998 he joined the Clinton administration spending two years as
the first U.S. ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom.
…
The point is not that these
connections are demonstrably nefarious. It’s that this kind of revolving
door is a significant, proven moral hazard in every other similar situation, in
which government agencies have favors to dispense or withhold, and … READ
ENTIRETY
7 Countries Gave Millions to
Clinton’s Foundation While She Was at State
By Tom Hamburger and Rosalind
Helderman, The Washington Post - February 27, 2015
The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from
seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary
of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the
Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United
States must look past the violence and extremism that has erupted after the
“Arab Spring” revolutions and boost support for the region’s young democracies
to forge long-term security, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Friday.
Last November, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
co-sponsored legislation along with Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) demanding
that President Obama label the Muslim Brotherhood an official foreign terrorist
organization. The Muslim
Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act prefaces its conclusions
with comprehensive research and historical precedent. "Multiple countries
have declared the Society of the Muslim Brothers (commonly known as the
‘‘Muslim Brotherhood’’) a terrorist organization or proscribed the group from
operating in their countries," begins the bill. The bill didn’t make it
through the winding roads of bureaucracy as a result of the Obama
administration’s apparent sympathies for the Islamist group, but now,
President-elect Donald Trump’s advisors are vowing to push through that same
piece of legislation when the Republican victor assumes the oath of office in
January.
The Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) has been connected to the terrorist organization Hamas,
a federal judge said in a
July 2009 ruling unsealed last week.
"The government has produced
ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA, NAIT, with NAIT,
the Islamic Association for Palestine, and with Hamas," U.S. District
Court Judge Jorge Solis said in the July 1, 2009, ruling.
CAIR, the Islamic Society of North
America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) had protested to
Solis that they were incorrectly named as unindicted co-conspirators in the
2008 trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. Among the
allegations, HLF was accused of having provided more than $12 million to Hamas.
After a 2007 mistrial, five former HLF officials convicted on
108 counts, ranging from money laundering to conspiring to provide material
support to terrorists.
The Clinton Foundation and the
terror group Hamas share a key donor: The government of Qatar, a leading backer
of terror groups that has emerged in recent years as Hamas’ chief financial
lifeline.
Qatar, which has been designated by
the State Department as a "significant terrorist financing risk,"
has pledged more than $400
million to Hamas since 2012 and has long harbored one of the terror group’s
senior leaders, Khaled Mashaal.
At the same time, Qatar has sought
to curry favor with elite Westerners, donatingbetween $1
million and $5 million through 2013 to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton
Foundation.
Does America really want '2
Clintons for price of 1' back in White House?
Published: 05/18/2015 at 7:57 PM
During his 1992 campaign for the
presidency, Bill Clinton was fond of promising America, “You get two for the
price of one,” indicating Hillary Clinton would act as his co-president.
But the nation got much more than
it bargained for, as the top power couple brought a load of baggage with them
into the White House from their days in Arkansas.
After the Clintons moved into the
presidential mansion, the political scandals multiplied – from use of the IRS
and FBI to target political opponents to stalking and harassing subjects of
Bill Clinton’s sexual advances and even attempts to loot taxpayer-funded items
from the White House. Americans also witnessed capers such as Travelgate,
Chinagate, Filegate and Pardongate.
Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades and
subsequent impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives on charges of
perjury and obstruction of justice consumed more than a year of American public
life and bitterly divided the nation.
In the years since the memorable
Clinton presidency, Hillary has brought America Emailgate and the Benghazi
scandal, among others… READ
THE REST
Many of us remember the classic
line from the “Seinfeld” show, that “it’s not a lie if you believe it.”
Applying that theme to the evolution of Hillary Rodham, then Hillary Rodham
Clinton, and now just plain Hillary Clinton, here are the
notable accomplishments of her “public service” career:
• Flunked the D.C. Bar Exam.
• Was removed from her House
Judiciary Committee staffer job because of incompetence and lying.
• The Whitewater scandal.
• Married a serial liar and
cheater, who occasionally had sexual encounters with nonconsenting partners.
• Lied about “sniper fire” in an
attempt to simulate exposure to danger in a war zone.
…
Two conclusions emerge from this
nefarious list of “accomplishments”:
First, Hillary’s brief solo
“professional” career [without Bill] was a total failure, and of her own
doing. …
Second, she is identified today in
friendly media solely by her “career” post-marriage to Bubba. This is the part
that Barack Obama recently described as making her “probably the best qualified
person ever to run for president.” This is both laughable and ironic … READ
ENTIRETY
There’s something darkly
instructive about Chelsea Manning’s attempted suicide just
a day after the FBI announced that it would not recommend charges against
Hillary Clinton.
Manning, as you might recall, is
the Benedict Arnold turncoat who exposed U.S. war crimes and is now serving 35
solitary years in a military prison in Kansas [Blog Editor: Surprise! Old Barry
Obama commuted shem’s sentence]. This venomous traitor should not
be confused with Mrs. Clinton, who created a private e-mail server to avoid
FOIA requests, shared classified material with her posse of yesmen, sold her
influence in the State Department to the highest bidders, attempted to destroy
evidence of criminal wrongdoing, and will almost certainly be our next
president.
Sorry, but it’s not a vast
right-wing conspiracy: The Clintons have been up to their eyeballs in shady
deals and corruption scandals since their humble country bumpkin beginnings in
Arkansas, which strangely enough was the staging ground for a massive CIA cocaine
drug smuggling operation while Bill was governor. Coincidence
or … READ
ENTIRETY [Blog Editor: Can you believe this was posted at HuffPo?]
Democratic presidential nominee
Hillary Clinton has always had a penchant for lying through her teeth, and
Monday's presidential debate was no different. Here are her nine biggest lies
from the debate.
1. Clinton lied about the cause
of the 2008 financial crisis. …
…
2. She falsely denied her
previous support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership. …
…
3. Clinton lied about the
effectiveness of stop-and-frisk. …
…
4. Clinton claimed that violent
crime is on the decline. It's not. …
…
5. Clinton continued to pander
to the Black Lives Matter movement by peddling the myth of systemic
racism. …
…
6. Clinton also claimed that
violent crime was decreasing in New York City. This, too, is false. …
…
7. Clinton portrayed herself as
a leading figure in slapping sanctions on Iran. This couldn't be further from
the truth. …
…
8. Clinton lavished praise on
the Iran deal for supposedly stopping Iran's nuclear program when it really
didn't. …
…
9. Clinton continues to lie
about her private email server. … READ
ENTIRETY
Hillary Clinton, as we always knew,
is a criminal.
The State Department Investigator
General released an 83 page report on Hillary Clinton’s email practices as
Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013 – and ripped her over and over again for
corrupt practices and lies.
1. Hillary said she set up the
private server for convenience, not to shield her communications from public
scrutiny. That isn’t true. …
…
2. Hillary told the public over
and over again that her personal server was secure. That, it turns
out, was a lie, as Lachlan Markay points
out; the report quotes a …
…
3. Hillary stated repeatedly that she had
been helpful and transparent in this investigation. Now the IG
reports, according to Politico,
that Hillary and her top aide, Huma Abedin, “chose not to cooperate with the
IG’s investigation.” …
4. Hillary stated that she had
turned over all relevant emails. Not so much. According to the IG
report:
…
5. Hillary said she used a
Blackberry for convenience. But she was explicitly told in March 2009
that Blackberries could not be fully secured, and Secretary Clinton said she
“gets it.” She didn’t stop using the Blackberry, however.
…
6. Hillary said she was cleared
by the State Department to use her personal server. This was untrue.
The report states:
The FBI just released notes from
its July 2 interview with Hillary Clinton about her use of a private, unsecured
email server during her tenure as secretary of State. Their findings don’t look
good for Clinton.
Days after the interview, which was
not recorded, FBI director James Comey publicly held a press conference urging
the Department of Justice not to press any criminal charges against Clinton,
despite her “extremely careless” handling
of classified information.
In the FBI report, Clinton made
statements that appear to either contradict her earlier remarks about the email
scandal or to be flat-out lies.
If Barack Obama did not document every one of Hilary Clinton's Crimes, the ones
he did not document in his Pardon are Crimes she can be Arrested for in the
future, I hope he has a complete list, Interpol, the FBI, NSA, and our CIA
should be helpful. We should just Extradite Obama and the Witch to Egypt and
George Soros to Russia.
It is not too late for Hilary's girlfriend and the Weiner to sing like
canaries.
From Whitewater to Benghazi: A
Clinton-Scandal Primer
In a letter on Sunday, FBI
Director James Comey wrote that newly discovered emails do not change the FBI’s
prior conclusion that Hillary Clinton should not be charged with a crime.
That’s FBI Director James Comey’s
new message to Congress and, by extension, the American public on Sunday. A
little over a week ago, Comey shook the presidential election with a letter to
the chairs of several congressional committees, announcing that the FBI had
found a new tranche of emails pertinent to its investigation into Hillary
Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state. The emails
came from an unrelated case, he said—since widely reported to be an
investigation into alleged sexts to a teenager from Anthony Weiner, whose
estranged wife is a top Clinton aide—and there was no timeline for finishing
the review.
Editor's Note: Our friend, Dan
from Squirrel Hill, has updated his list to 1,063 documented
examples of Barack Obama's lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism,
etc. He began with 252
examples, then quickly grew to 504 and
later to 694.
In November 2014, he
added more than 200 more examples of the usurper-in-chief's
unlawful acts. Today, that number has grown to 1,063.
Every President, every politician, and every human being tells lies and
engages in acts of hypocrisy. But Barack Obama does these things to a far
greater degree than anyone else that I have ever known of. His campaign promises
were so much better sounding than anyone else's – no lobbyists in his
administration, waiting five days before signing all non-emergency bills so
people would have time to read them, putting health care negotiations on
C-SPAN, reading every bill line by line to make sure money isn't being wasted,
prosecution of Wall St. criminals, ending raids against medical marijuana in
states where it's legal, high levels of transparency. Obama's promises of these
wonderful things sounded inspiring and sincere. They sounded so much better
than the promises of any other President. So when Obama broke these promises,
it felt so much worse than when other Presidents broke their promises.
Obama's White House didn't rule out the possibility of
Hillary Clinton receiving a last-minute pardon from President Obama — even
though she hasn’t been charged with a crime. Too late now.
A pardon for Hilary will remove all doubt.
Hilary Clinton is a Criminal and always has been.
Where is a RICO investigation when we need one?
Destroying Justice one time is conflict of interest, the Democrat Party's lies
and crimes for the last 50 years is Treason.
Here are 1,366 well sourced
examples of Barack Obama’s lies, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, hypocrisy,
waste, etc.
Posted on August 15, 2013. Last
updated on August 9, 2017.
By Dan from Squirrel Hill
…
Every claim that I make in this
list is sourced. Click on the underlined text to see the sources. I have cited a
wide variety of sources, from right wing, to left wing, to middle of the road.
…
1) Carried out military
interventionism in Libya without Congressional approval
2) Gave a no-bid contract
to Halliburton cronies – just like Bush did
3) Has an administration
full of lobbyists, after promising he wouldn’t have any
4) Had close ties to Wall
St., but pretended to support Occupy Wall St.
5) Broke his promise to
close Guantanamo Bay
6) Supported the $700
billion TARP corporate-welfare bailout just like Bush
7) Waged the biggest war
against medical marijuana of any president, which was the opposite of what he
had promised
8) Nominated a six-time tax
cheater to head the government agency that enforces the tax laws
9) Gave tax dollars to AIG
executives, then pretended to be outraged about it
… READ
ENTIRETY [The List literally quite extensive with loads of commentary I
did not include in the excerpt. To be honest some of these points I don’t have
a problem with.]]
Mueller was Hilary's boy in the Russian Uranium deal.
More than 11,000 private messages
from Julian Assange reveal
the WikiLeaks founder
believed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a
“well connected, sadistic sociopath.”
The leaked private Twitter messages, obtained by The Intercept,
reveal Assange feared a Clinton presidency would
lead to endless wars, collusion with the mainstream media to suppress
information from the public, and turmoil with Russia.
…
The leaked messages largely illustrate
how Assange feared Clinton would weaponize the mainstream media to conceal
information from the public.
