DONATE

Showing posts with label NAACP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NAACP. Show all posts

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Purging History


Intro to ‘Purging History’
John R. Houk Editor
Posted June 10, 2017

Those horrible White slave owners of American history should be purged, right? NO!

Ending slavery was an awesome end result of the Northern States defeating the Southern States by the end of 1865. Regardless of the immoral slave culture these Southern Confederates tried to perpetuate, many were great Christians and supporter of the heritage of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

The break-away Confederate States had their capital city in Richmond Virginia. The Confederate’s primary general was Robert E. Lee from Virginia. Thomas ‘Stonewall’ Jackson was raised in what is now West Virginia, but was a part of Virginia at the beginning of the Civil War.

Why the emphasis on Civil War Virginia? George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison all came from Virginia – former British Colony turned into one of the original Thirteen States. Those three Virginians were extremely instrumental in the formation and founding of the sovereign United States of America.

Washington: Commander-in-Chief the Revolutionary War army that ultimately prevailed and forced the recognition of an independent United States; President of the Constitutional Convention AND the first President of the United States.

Jefferson: Writer of the Declaration of Independence; Revolutionary War Foreign Diplomat; much of Jefferson’s Virginia legislation influenced the U.S. Constitution but not a fan of the Constitution central government yet an ardent supporter once ratified AND third President of the United States.

Madison: Madison was involved in Virginia politics during the Revolutionary War widely influential in writing Virginia’s new State Constitution; wrote the drafts of the U.S. Constitution and designed the Bill of Rights – hence known as the Father of the Constitution; one of the principle writers of The Federal Papers used to encourage the ratification of the Constitution AND the fourth President of the United States.

Now I realize my little synopsis of Founding Father heroes of our American is hardly complete. Also I realize that many other influential Founding Fathers both in and out of Virginia are not mentioned. MY POINT is leading to the fact these remarkably influential Virginia Founding Fathers ALL were slave-owning Plantation businessmen of their day.

Should we allow the hysterical American Left to purge their names from U.S. history?

Justin Smith wonders why We The People of America allow Confederate history to be scrubbed because of slavery? Here are some introductory words from Justin Smith:

This piece is by no means intended to defend the evils of slavery or the sins committed by slave owners. It is simply an attempt to illustrate the fallacies relied upon by the Left as they attempt to portray the Civil War only in the context of the slave issue; it truly was much more complex than most people understand, and this one article barely scratches the surface. Now however, the past is being improperly used as a tool of commie progressives to undermine America, as much as they are allowed by the normal population of America.

I hope this peaks the curiosity of many and moves them to halt these sort of movements whenever they arise near them or in their home towns.

JRH 6/10/17
***************
Purging History

By Justin O. Smith
Sent 6/8/2017 4:20 PM

Monuments honoring heroes of the Confederate States of America, American heroes in fact, are being removed from the public square, due to a successful presentation of oversimplified arguments and lies by the same progressive Leftist Democratic apparatus that seeks to fundamentally transform America. These assaults on the Southern heritage by politically correct propagandists and arrogant activist ideologues are assaults on our American culture and heritage, or "AmeriKKKa" as the Left calls America; and, it is nothing short of a cultural cleansing campaign, a purging of the truth and history and a national disgrace.

In 2015, the Atlanta chapter of the NAACP called for the destruction of the Stone Mountain Confederate Monument, that honors Jefferson Davis, General Robert E. Lee and General Stonewall Jackson. They wanted the nearly 2000 square feet and 12 feet deep carving "sandblasted away".

In February, the city council of Charlottesville, VA sought to remove Robert E. Lee's likeness from its 100 year resting place. They have been temporarily blocked by a lawsuit filed by the Monument Fund and 29 other plaintiffs.

Soon protests arose in Charlottesville and NAACP President Rick Turner told the crowds: "I think a decision must be made to remove the statue by any means necessary."

However, the City of New Orleans successfully removed the Battle of Liberty Place obelisk on April 24th and statues of Confederate President Jefferson Davis and General Pierre Gustave Toutant-Beauregard on May 11th and May 17th, consecutively. The statue of Robert E. Lee was removed from New Orlean's Lee Circle on May 19th, while other efforts are appearing nationwide, in places like Houston and Baltimore.

[Blog Editor: A great pro-history article at The Federalist.]

Starting in 1784, Thomas Jefferson and many righteous men afterwards attempted to abolish slavery until the end of the Civil War, including former slave owners such as James Madison. It is worth observing that while General Ulysses S. Grant owned one slave and his wife owned four slaves until 1859, General Robert E. Lee never owned any [Blog Editor: The no-slave claim is disputed. WaPo says yes & another source implies no. The “no” is representative of R.E. Lee’s disposition against slavery even though he managed his wife’s inherited slaves as a Plantation owner until Lee freed them by order of his father-in-law’s will.].

General Beauregard's statue was taken down in the dark of night and Lee's was coming down, when New Orlean's Mayor Mitch Landrieu (D) revealed an astounding level of ignorance of history, stating: "They may have been warriors, but in this cause they were not patriots. These monuments celebrate a fictional sanitized Confederacy." Landrieu could not be any more egregiously wrong.

On December 27th 1856, Robert E. Lee wrote to his wife: "Slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil in any country ... a greater evil to the white than to the black race ... nearly two thousand years [of Christianity] ... and even among the Christian nations what gross errors still exist!"

Many Confederate generals did not want to secede and neither did Jefferson Davis. More than the issue of slavery that had profited both New England slave traders and Southern plantation owners, the South saw secession as a necessity in the face of the unfair tariffs the North had applied against the South from 1828 to 1832 and beyond. And so, they too pledged their lives, fortune and sacred honor as they seceded from an oppressive federal government to retain their sovereignty, their Constitutional rights and a free government.

President Abraham Lincoln was not any "Great Emancipator" himself. On August 22nd 1862, he wrote a letter to Horace Greeley, founder and editor of the New York Tribune, who supported a general amnesty for Confederate officials and angered Northeners by signing a bail bond for Jefferson Davis. In part the letter read: "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could do it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that."

So why do the Leftist mobs of Antifa and Black Lives Matter castigate, impugn and demonize the character and honor of a noble man such as Robert E. Lee, while giving Ulysses S. Grant a pass?

General PGT Beauregard was a St Bernard Parrish native and a man of contradictions, who spent most of his non-military life in New Orleans. He fired the first shots in a war to preserve states rights and slavery, and yet in defeat, Beauregard argued passionately for the right of black people to vote.

So, Beauregard is impugned, while a statue of Senator Edward Carmack (D-TN) still stands in Nashville on the south side of Tennessee's State Capitol Building. Carmack advocated for the repeal of the 15th Amendment, which granted black men the right to vote; he was also the editor of the 'Nashville Tennessean' and a coward, who was shot and killed, on Union St. in Nashville, as he hid behind Mrs. Charles Eastman after firing on Duncan Cooper, his nemesis.

It is nearly impossible to find any truth behind the Left's assertions, that they are campaigning against the "white supremacy" symbolized by Confederate monuments, when most Confederate soldiers did not own slaves by the time the Civil War was burning hot. To claim that the majority of non-slaveholder soldiers, who fought for the South, could have fought and sacrificed their lives and those of their families, so a minority of wealthy aristocrats could retain the "right" to own slaves is preposterous on any analysis.

The logic behind these character assassinations make it inescapably clear that the Left will not be satisfied until every white figure who doesn't pass their "progressive" scrutiny is cleansed from the Southern culture and American culture too. How much truth must be sacrificed to mold history to fit a single strain of a prevailing political ideology?

Mitch Landrieu and Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh and many other Democrats, along with some misguided and ill-informed "conservatives" say that these men don't deserve to be honored. Who does then?

President McKinley had fought against "Stonewall" Jackson, as a teenager, in the Shenandoah. McKinley was at Antietam, the bloodiest single-day battle of the Civil War; and at the start of the Spanish-American War, when Southern volunteers and former Confederate soldiers paraded through Atlanta to fight for a united America, McKinley removed his hat and stood for the singing of 'Dixie'.

Nearly half of the fifty-five members of the Constitutional Convention owned slaves or facilitated the slave trade. Is anything associated with Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and other Founders now considered to be immoral too?

Are Americans really going to allow more monuments to be torn down? Are Americans going to sandblast Stone Mountain Confederate Monument and even Mount Rushmore, sandblasting away our American Heritage? I say "NO".

Left unrestrained, the radicals of this nation will attempt to purge and destroy every vestige of anything remotely associated with any slaveholder. Our Constitution and even our Declaration of Independence have long been under their assaults, because both were written by white men and slave-owners, and these amended documents halt their own authoritarian agenda. They would scrap these documents altogether if they could, placing them in the dustbin of history and divesting them of honor.

A history hidden away and purged is a half-truth and a lie, no history at all. America's sins in slavery are despicable, abominable and dark, however, Her inalienable rights that served as the mechanism to end slavery are virtues to be praised, brilliant as a rising sun.

By Justin O. Smith
_________________
Edited by John R. Houk

All links as well as text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.


© Justin O. Smith

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Reporters vs. Conservative Black Leaders at Press Conference

Black Conservatives appear at a Tea Party Express press release to counter the NAACP and members of the Democratic Party accusation of racism toward the Tea Party Movement.

JRH 8/8/10


Monday, July 19, 2010

NAACP and CAIR Racist Hypocrisy



John R. Houk
© July 19, 2010


I knew the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) had become a Leftist tool to cast the Tea Party Movement in a bad light as a racist movement.

It is an irony that the NAACP has used one of the favorites of the Leftist arsenal: THE RACE CARD. I mean look at the name of the organization. The NAACP spells out it represents an association that advances “Colored People”. Again the irony is that the NAACP was created by the Republican Party to assist African-Americans from the racism which was once highly pervasive in America particularly in the South and urban centers. Of course groups like the NAACP, the Jesse Jackson group, the Al Sharpton group and the pervasively racist Nation of Islam of Louis Farrakhan have accomplished more to economically enslave African-Americans to a Leftist welfare-like dependence and look out for whitey for he is against you mentality. Instead promoting racial harmony these groups are still ensconced in portraying African-Americans as victims of retrograde Black Slavery and White enslavement.

Cynthia Tucker listed four criticisms of the NAACP (Emphasis is mine):

First off, few will remember the word “elements” expected to be included in the final wording, so the resolution will be roundly interpreted as smearing all tea partiers. (There really is no such thing as The Tea Party. It’s not an organization; it’s a movement of loosely affiliated activists who detest Obama and rally around lower taxes and limited government.) … Still, it leaves the impression that the NAACP believes all tea partiers are racist — a stereotype that the NAACP should abhor.

Second, the resolution further arouses well-justified suspicions that the NAACP is nothing more than an arm of the Democratic Party. NAACP President Benjamin Jealous has said the anti-tea party resolution will, among other things, motivate his members to vote in the mid-term elections. That suggests the organization’s chief concern is supporting Democrats in the fall. (Does the IRS know?) It is perfectly appropriate for the NAACP to rally around specific political issues, such as comprehensive immigration reform.

However, according to NAACP President Benjamin Jealous, “The NAACP along with it allies and partners will show America that a solid majority of this nation is ready, willing and able to fight back to ensure that all the change we voted for is made a reality for all of our children.” That sounds suspiciously like a vote for Democrats, period.

Third, it’s awfully hypocritical for the NAACP to call for the tea partiers to purge their ranks of racists, as Jealous did. It’s a rare day, indeed, that the NAACP purges its ranks, no matter how inappropriately some of its members behave.

And, fourth, this resolution just draws attention to the tea partiers — who represent, at most, about 20 percent of the electorate — and gives the demagogues something to rally around. Already, tea partiers and their supporters are having a field day with the resolution, calling NAACPers reverse racists and insisting they withdraw the statement.



I should not be surprised but I recently discovered that the Islamic Supremacist Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has become an NAACP bedfellow in also calling the Tea Party Movement a racist movement.

Joseph Farah has sent out a blog ready editorial condemning both the NAACP and CAIR as anti-American tools.

JRH 7/19/10
******************************
NAACP, CAIR ‘through the looking glass’ on racist labels

Commentary
by Joseph Farah
Sent: 7/19/2010 3:11 AM
Sent by: WorldNetDaily


Pot to kettle: 'You're a racist'
Author indicts audacity of accusations from professional ‘victims’ who traffic in intolerance


I often suggest we are living in a world where up is down, black is white, right is wrong and left is … well, no, left is still never right.

That would be "bizarro world," that parallel universe, where everything is backward is what I think about with regard to the groundless, baseless, irresponsible, false, unjustifiable and unsubstantiated accusations of racism against the tea party movement by a group seeking the advancement of non-whites – the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

About the meanest, most hurtful, most ruthless smear you can make about someone in American in 2010 is to label that person a racist – and rightfully so. If anyone hates other people and wishes them ill because of the color of their skin, that person deserves to be vilified and berated.

However, when that accusation is unfairly, inappropriately and cavalierly hurled at people, those doing the smearing are the ones who should be vilified and berated. In fact, they are actually in service to the cause of hate and racism when they cheapen the label and simply use the accusation to attack those with whom they simply have a political disagreement.

And that's really what's going on here with the NAACP. I suspect even the leaders of the organization have some regrets about promoting the resolution condemning the tea party movement for racism without the slightest trace of evidence. It's backfiring on the group. No sooner was the ink dry on the resolution than the backtracking began.

Ben Jealous, the chairman of the NAACP, suggested the resolution did not actually indict the tea party for racism (which it did). It was more of a warning, he said. Now he demands the tea party movement repudiate racism.

It's like the old interrogation line, "When did you stop beating your wife?"

Exactly who at the tea party movement is supposed to do that? There are no prominent national leaders of this decentralized movement. This is a spontaneous, grass-roots effort – barely 18 months old. Are the tens of millions of Americans who identify with this movement supposed to denounce racism in unison?

For what it's worth, I'm going to do something historic right now. As the author of "The Tea Party Manifesto," a book that seeks to give the movement a mission statement upon which to build a consensus, I'm going to take the liberty speak right here and now for the tea party movement – just this once.

"The tea party movement that seeks to promote the proper role of government in America – namely as the protector of all peoples' individual, God-given, inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, without regard to race, color or creed."

I have met hundreds of tea party activists across this country and, I believe, that every single one of them would approve of that statement.

However, I don't believe for a moment that those hurling the racial accusations would.

The NAACP, for instance, still clings to the Marxist notion that only whites can be racist. Why? Because whites have the power, they say, and racism is about using power to victimize racial minorities.

Think about this: We have a black president. We have a black attorney general of the United States. We have sworn testimony from a former U.S. attorney accusing the Justice Department of pervasive racism in the dismissing of cases against black defendants charged with victimizing whites. But the NAACP couldn’t care less about that. Instead, the NAACP is concerned about the mere potential for racism in politically disenfranchised grass-roots activists who have demonstrated no racist attitudes at all.

Make sense to you?

But the hypocrisy and double-standards get worse.

Another group has rushed to the defense of the NAACP. It's the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Communications director Ibrahim Hooper says the tea party activists have "failed to repudiate elements within the movement who use racist or bigoted language." He says CAIR is now tracking incidents it claims show tea partiers are "Islamophobic," whatever that means.

As I stated earlier, I believe the tea party movement is characterized by deep commitment to the inherent, inalienable and God-given rights to all people – and that includes the right to worship freely or not worship at all.

Does CAIR?

If so, has CAIR ever repudiated the government of Saudi Arabia for banning Bibles, banning churches, banning worship of any kind other than Sunni Islam, banning the travel into the city of Mecca by any except Muslims?

I don't think so.

Has CAIR ever sent back any of the millions of dollars it has received from Saudi Arabia, the most religiously intolerant nation on Earth?

I don't think so.

Has CAIR ever called for opening the city of Mecca to people of all faiths?

I don't think so.

Has CAIR ever humbly apologized for the wanton destruction of Christian churches throughout the Islamic world?

I don't think so.

Has CAIR ever used its influence within the Islamic world to stop the brutal persecution of Christians, Jews and other non-Muslims?

I don't think so.

Pot to kettle: "You're a racist!"

_____________________
NAACP and CAIR Racist Hypocrisy
John R. Houk
© July 19, 2010
_____________________________
NAACP, CAIR ‘through the looking glass’ on racist labels

Joseph Farah -
founder, editor, and CEO of WorldNetDaily, the world's leading independent Internet news source - joined Sarah Palin as one of two nationally televised keynote speakers at the first national Tea Party Convention in Nashville in February. His 2003 bestseller, Taking America Back, prophesied the movement today known as "the tea party." The former daily newspaper editor has authored, co-authored, or collaborated on more than a dozen books, including Rush Limbaugh's "See, Told You So."

To interview Joseph Farah, or [ask for copies] of Tea Party Manifesto, contact Tim Bueler at (530) 401-3285 or media@wnd.com

Copyright 1997-2010 WorldNetDaily.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.