John R. Houk – Editor
© June 11, 2016
If you are a Conservative you consider it a fairly logical
guess that the major search engine giants are in the tank to promote the Dem
Party nominee for President, right?
SourceFed
evidently desired to test a Conservative’s logic by running tests. They found
that Google was not only supportive
of the Dem Party by of Hillary Clinton in particular. How? By manipulating your
search with the autocomplete algorithm to point toward favorable info on
Hillary and unfavorable info on Trump and Sanders.
The SourceFed
homepage doesn’t really point to an about page for semi-computer literate Baby
Boomers (like me) to figure out what their
raison
d'etre is. I am guessing computer geeks and/or nerds know exactly the
purpose of SourceFed. The SourceFed homepage does point to a lot
of Youtube projects involving the
same name. The SourceFed Youtube about page offers this:
Description
Welcome to SourceFed! Everything
that should and shouldn't matter explained by the people who love the same
things you do. We do the news... sort of.
We also go even more in-depth with
all our stories on our website SourceFed.com. Also, if you like our stuff, be
sure to show us some love on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.
At any rate, I found the SourceFed
video at the Washington
Free Beacon. The Beacon
their report with the roughly 7-minute SourceFed
video which exposes Google. The Beacon runs an article more suitable to Baby-Boomer-Speak. Evidently Google, in an attempt to protect its
integrity, is denying the results of the SourceFed
analysis. I am guessing the denial because the Beacon runs another video – this time by the Washington Examiner – that runs a similar to SourceFed analysis in response to a Google denial. The Washington Examiner video is not a Youtube video but it has an embed that my various blog platforms
may or may not accept.
JRH 6/11/16
*****************************
Google Allegedly Manipulating Search Results to Help
Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
June 10, 2016 12:16 pm
[Blog Editor: Just for clarity, the
Youtube description is not a part of the Washington Free Beacon article]
Posted by SourceFed
Published on Jun 9, 2016
UPDATE: Friday June 10
Google has responded to this video via an email statement to the
Washington Times:
"Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause. Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms."
Read the full article here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/10/google-denies-burying-bad-hillary-clinton-stories/
While researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, we discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton. If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren’t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google’s algorithm. According to a research paper cited in this video, that kind of search result manipulation has the potential to substantially influence the outcome of actual elections.
Sources:
"Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause. Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms."
Read the full article here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/10/google-denies-burying-bad-hillary-clinton-stories/
While researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, we discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton. If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren’t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google’s algorithm. According to a research paper cited in this video, that kind of search result manipulation has the potential to substantially influence the outcome of actual elections.
Sources:
Official 'Groundwork' Website: http://bit.ly/1WP53z3
Tech giant Google is allegedly manipulating its online
search results to bury terms that could be damaging to Hillary Clinton’s
presidential campaign, according to an analysis conducted by SourceFed, a news
website with a prominent YouTube channel.
“SourceFed has discovered that Google has been actively
altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, so
quietly that we were unable to see it for what it was until today,” SourceFed’s
Matt Lieberman said in a new video posted online Thursday.
Lieberman explained how, for example, if someone types
“Hillary Clinton cri” into Google, the site’s auto-complete function,
which provides the user search term suggestions while typing into the search
bar, shows three potential searches: “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” “Hillary
Clinton crisis,” and “Hillary Clinton crime bill 1994.” But when someone types
“Hillary Clinton cri” into Yahoo’s search engine, the first search suggestion
to appear is “Hillary Clinton criminal charges,” followed by “Hillary Clinton
crimes” and “Hillary Clinton criminal.”
“There’s clearly something wrong here, right?” Lieberman
asked. “It’s like if you put three people into a room that’s on fire and two
out of three people yell ‘fire’ and the third person yells, ‘I’m in a room.’”
The SourceFed analysis shows that this mismatch in
search terms is intentional rather than the result of people searching
different terms on different websites.
Lieberman explained that when SourceFed searched in
Google Trends for “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” the site’s top search
suggestion for the aforementioned example, there were not enough searches of
the term to even build a graph on the site. However, when SourceFed searched
“Hillary Clinton crimes,” Google gave back a full graph, indicating that far
more people are searching for the latter term rather than the former.
“Which begs the question, why on earth is [Hillary Clinton
crime reform] the first potential result?” Lieberman asked. “Google just
doesn’t want you to know or ask.”
To gather more data, SourceFed wanted to see if Clinton’s
much-discussed private email server that she used as secretary of state would
yield similar results.
They discovered that when someone types “Hillary Clinton
ind” into Bing or Yahoo, the first search suggestion is “Hillary Clinton
indictment,” followed by a series of indictment-related search terms. When the
same text is typed into Google, though, the first two recommended terms are
“Hillary Clinton Indiana” and “Hillary Clinton India.”
“Could people really be searching more for ‘Hillary Clinton
India’ than ‘Hillary Clinton indictment?’” Lieberman asked.
When he typed the two terms into Google Trends, it showed
that people have been searching for “Hillary Clinton indictment” eight times
more often than “Hillary Clinton India.”
“The intention is clear: Google is burying potential
searches for terms that could have hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary
elections over the past several months by manipulating recommendations on their
site,” Lieberman said.
For comparison, SourceFed searched for negative terms
associated with Clinton’s primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) and
presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump. When they typed in “Bernie Sanders
soc” for socialist and “Donald Trump rac” for racist, Google matched the
recommendations for Bing and Yahoo.
“At this stage, I must be clear: We at SourceFed are not
accusing any individuals of any crimes,” Lieberman said, adding that if Google
did manipulate search results it would be “unethical and wrong but not
illegal.”
He added that there is no evidence of Hillary Clinton’s
campaign having involvement with this issue, but noted there are a “stunning”
number of links between Google and the Clinton campaign, most of which stem
from Eric Schmidt,
executive chairman of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc., and former chief
executive officer of Google.
Lieberman also noted that Schmidt is a major funder of The
Groundwork, which is, according to Democratic campaign operatives, “an
investment by Schmidt to ensure that Hillary Clinton has the technological and
engineering prowess to win the election.”
The Groundwork is one of the Clinton campaign’s most
expensive outside contractors, costing $177,000 in the second quarter of 2015
alone.
Lieberman said the connection between Google, Schmidt, and
Clinton is clear, adding that the Clinton campaign’s chief technology officer,
Stephanie Hannon, is a former Google executive.
Lieberman also explained that, despite voters having access
to an innumerable number of sources of information, manipulating Google
searches can have a profound effect on voters’ decisions.
SourceFed cited the work of Dr. Robert Epstein, a
psychologist at the American Institute of Behavioral Research, whose most
recent experiments focused on changing political opinion through search engine
results. In his study, according to Lieberman, Epstein held a mock election and
allowed the mock voters to search for various terms regarding the two
candidates. Epstein showed mostly positive results for both Candidate A and
Candidate B, while having a control group that received mixed, untouched
results.
“What he found was that he was able to swing voters up to 48
percent for whatever side had more positive results, a process he dubbed ‘voter
manipulation power,’” Lieberman said.
Epstein was quoted after the experiment as saying, “Google
could determine the outcome of upwards of 25 percent of all national
elections.”
Lieberman noted that the Hillary Clinton campaign has made
no comment about the topic of search manipulation.
[Blog Editor – Washington Free Beacon of interest: Here
Are 10 More Examples of Google Search Results Favorable to Hillary; BY: Brent Scher
and Elizabeth Harrington; 6/10/16 1:30 pm]
+++
Washington
Examiner VIDEO: Is
Google Manipulating Search Results to Favor Hillary Clinton?
_________________________
Intro to Google to Manipulating Searches to Favor Hillary
John R. Houk – Editor
© June 11, 2016
_________________________
Google Allegedly Manipulating Search Results to Help
Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
Aaron Kliegman is a Media Analyst for the Washington Free Beacon and a Master's Degree Candidate in Johns Hopkins's Global Security Studies Program in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining the Free Beacon, Aaron worked as a Research Associate for the Center for Security Policy, a national security think tank, and as the Deputy Field Director on Micah Edmond's campaign for U.S. Congress. He graduated from Washington & Lee University in 2014 and lives in Washington, D.C. His Twitter handle is @Aaron_Kliegman. He can be reached at kliegman@freebeacon.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment