My Fellow Americans, These Are NOT Your Friends: Russia, China & Islam
Posted by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
Posted on July 18, 2023
I’ve had a difficult time trying to grasp on to a subject to
grouse upon the last couple of days. Ergo, here’s a reality to dwell on: Russia
and CCP-controlled China are NOT friends of America! If you love American
Liberty and believe in a Christian heritage, Islam cannot be your friend. The
two posts on this point:
o The
new Russia-China alignment: Orwell's three super-states prediction in formation
stage? China, Russia creating new 'democratic world order,'
Russian Foreign Minister; By Eliyahu Tulshinski; Frontline News; 7/16/23 08:28 AM
o What
Qualifies Islam as a Religion? By Amil Imani; News With Views; 7/16/23
The subject matter is unrelated yet controversial in a WOKE
brainwashed society. So, explore and do your own thinking.
JRH 7/18/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My
Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
************************
The new Russia-China alignment: Orwell's three
super-states prediction in formation stage?
China, Russia creating new 'democratic world order,'
Russian Foreign Minister
.jpg)
Bear/Dragon Friendship (Russia/CCP China)
July 16, 2023 08:28 AM
Communist China President Xi Jinping last week accelerated
his nation's increasing military and economic cooperation with the “former”
communists running Russia, carrying out joint naval drills, and proclaiming
“long live [their] friendship.”
🇨🇳🇷🇺 Russian Warships Welcomed in China! Chinese sailors lined up on the pier, holding banners with welcome inscriptions in both Russian and Chinese. “Long live friendship between Russia and China. We warmly welcome the visit of the formation of Russian Navy ships to Shanghai.” pic.twitter.com/sQMo9GQ70U
— 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉 (@apocalypseos) July 7, 2023
The New Indian Express reported on the warming ties and their
implication for global politics.
Beijing and Moscow have ramped
up economic cooperation and diplomatic contacts in recent years, with exchanges
only growing closer since Russia's invasion of Ukraine last year.
On Monday, Xi met Valentina
Matviyenko, the speaker of the Federation Council -- the Russian
parliament's upper house -- at the Great Hall of the People, state broadcaster
CCTV reported.
Xi said the development of
relations between the two countries was "a strategic choice made by both
countries based on the fundamental interests of their respective countries and
peoples", according to CCTV.
"Both sides also need to
strengthen communication and collaboration within multilateral mechanisms such
as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the BRICS countries, lead
the correct direction of global governance reform, and
safeguard the common interests of emerging market countries and developing
countries," the statement continued. [Emphases added].
Not everyone surprised
The warming ties might take by surprise those who accepted
the State Department claim that the alleged Sino-Soviet split was genuine and
now find the US apparently left in the cold by the tightening alliance.
Xi Jinping called for strengthening cooperation between Russia and China
— Black Diamond (@blackdiammon) July 11, 2023
🇨🇳🤝🇷🇺 pic.twitter.com/2gbeckn3Jx
Those familiar with Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, though, would well
have expected to see alliances between what he labels the three super-states,
led by China, Russia, and the US.
The splitting up of the world
into three great super-states was an event which could be and indeed was
foreseen before the middle of the twentieth century. With the absorption of
Europe by Russia and of the British Empire by the United
States, two of the three existing powers, Eurasia and
Oceania, were already effectively in being. The third, Eastasia, only
emerged as a distinct unit after another decade of confused fighting . . .
Eurasia comprises the whole of
the northern part of the European and Asiatic land-mass, from Portugal to the
Bering Strait.
Oceania comprises the Americas,
the Atlantic islands including the British Isles, Australasia, and the southern
portion of Africa.
Eastasia,
smaller than the others and with a less definite western frontier,
comprises China and the countries to the south of it,
the Japanese islands and a large but fluctuating portion of Manchuria,
Mongolia, and Tibet. [Emphases added; pp. 234-235].
The above map, posted to Wikipedia’s ‘1984′
entry, delineates the borders of Orwell's three super-states and
depicts the “disputed” areas over which the super-states battle.
Endless, contrived wars
Orwell's readers would also expect those alliances to alter
periodically as, he explains, their conflicts exist for public consumption,
with no super-state actually trying to defeat another.
In one combination or
another, these three super-states are permanently at war .
. . To understand the nature of the present war — for in spite of the
regrouping which occurs every few years, it is always the same war — one must
realize in the first place that it is impossible for it to be decisive. None of
the three super-states could be definitively conquered even by the other two in
combination . . .
Between the frontiers of the
super-states, and not permanently in the possession of any of them, there lies
a rough quadrilateral with its corners at Tangier, Brazzaville, Darwin, and
Hong Kong, containing within it about a fifth of the population of the earth.
It is for the possession of these thickly-populated regions, and of the
northern ice-cap, that the three powers are constantly struggling . . .
It should be noted that the
fighting never really moves beyond the edges of the disputed areas [which] are
constantly being captured and recaptured . . . but the balance of power always
remains roughly even, and the territory which forms the heartland of each
super-state always remains inviolate. [Emphasis added; pp. 235-238].
So why fight?
If the “controlled conflicts” between the super-states are
not intended to attain a lasting conquest, what is the purpose of the wars? To
block the progress and expansion of wealth that would naturally accompany an
industrial and technological revolutions in peacetime, explains Orwell.
The primary aim of modern
warfare (in accordance with the principles of DOUBLETHINK,
this aim is simultaneously recognized and not recognized by the directing
brains of the Inner Party) is to use up the products of the machine
without raising the general standard of living. Ever since the end
of the nineteenth century, the problem of what to do with the surplus of
consumption goods has been latent in industrial society . . .
From the moment when the machine
first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for
human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had
disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger,
overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations .
. . [Emphases added; pp. 239].
Can't be rich without the poor
And why would hard core socialists oppose increasing and
spreading wealth? Apparently equality in power and finance are not communist
goals, and are actually loathsome to communists, according to the author who
himself learned about socialism, Marxism and communism first-hand, having
fought for the Soviet-backed Republican Faction in the Spanish Civil War.
[I]t was also clear that an
all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction — indeed,
in some sense was the destruction — of a hierarchical society.
In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a
house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an
aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality
would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth
would confer no distinction.
It was possible, no doubt, to
imagine a society in which WEALTH, in the sense of personal possessions and
luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while POWER remained in the hands of a
small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain
stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass
of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and
would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they
would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and
they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society
was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance. [Emphases added;
pp. 238-239].
Cult of scarcity
Orwell emphasizes that scarcity, and not merely an
absence of wealth, is key to the totalitarian scheme, in which “inner party”
members suffer less from scarcity than “outer party” members who in turns
suffer less than non-party members.
It is deliberate policy to keep
even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a
general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus
magnifies the distinction between one group and another . . .
a member of the Inner Party
lives an austere, laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that
he does enjoy his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his
clothes, the better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three
servants, his private motor-car or helicopter — set him in a different world
from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have a
similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call 'the
proles'. [P. 242].
Rabbi Dovid Smith, Esq., terms the belief in and fear of
scarcity as a “cult of scarcity,” which only has an impact when the masses
believe the necessities of life cannot be provided in abundance through a
proper economic and political system. He equates the
fear with an allegiance to a pagan cult.
The choice is between the G-d of
abundance and the cult of scarcity. It is the cult of scarcity that births the
ideology of public health [in which individual health is put aside for the
health of others under the belief that there are not sufficient resources to
treat each person's health needs individually].
Whereas the G-d of abundance
treasures the primacy of human life, the cult of scarcity always points to
humanity as the problem [claiming] that there is not enough time, love, money,
water, air, space, oil, ozone, and on and on,
Deception that works
Keeping the wars going, even as people find bits and pieces
of the stories surrounding the wars to be factually inaccurate, requires a good
bit of “doublethink,” in which a person accepts gross contradictions and
outright falsehoods as fact. Describing the extraordinary ability of the elite
class running a totalitarian regime to create the atmosphere for doublethink,
Orwell informs us that the higher rank one achieves, and thus the more they are
exposed to the regime's lies, the more fervent their belief in
its genuineness.
It is precisely in the Inner
Party that war hysteria and hatred of the enemy are strongest. In his capacity
as an administrator, it is often necessary for a member of the Inner
Party to know that this or that item of war news is untruthful, and he may
often be aware that the entire war is spurious and is either not happening or
is being waged for purposes quite other than the declared ones: but
such knowledge is easily neutralized by the technique of DOUBLETHINK.
Meanwhile no Inner Party member wavers for an instant in his mystical belief
that the war is real, and that it is bound to end victoriously . . . [Emphasis
added; P. 243].
The doublethink continues, according to Orwell, even as it
becomes obvious that there's something “off” about the war.
But when war becomes literally
continuous, it also ceases to be dangerous . . . The war, therefore, if we
judge it by the standards of previous wars, is merely an imposture. It is like
the battles between certain ruminant animals whose horns are set at such an
angle that they are incapable of hurting one another. [Pp. 250-251].
The real enemy
Doublethink even allows one to ignore their own observation
that the warring regimes target their own populations more than they target
their supposed adversaries. As their fellow citizens, and they themselves,
suffer from the regime's clampdown on individual freedom, they will, in
Orwell's estimate, continue supporting their government and its wars.
In our own day they
are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling
group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to
make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society
intact. [Emphasis added; pp. 251-252].
Please see our previous articles on Russian and Chinese
deception:
1. Who’s behind Russian oligarch deaths?
2. Proof of controlled conflict in Ukraine
3. US government props up ‘former communists’ despite defector’s
warnings
4. How one defector got it right
5. 100 years of fake communist collapses
6. Did the Soviet Union fake its own funeral?
7. Emergency weapons set aside for Israel clandestinely diverted
to Ukraine
8. Fact Check: Chinese Communist Party building spy base 90 miles
from U.S.?
1984 – Orwell: 'I Told You So'
Frontline News –
LIBERTY LIVES IN LIGHT HOMEPAGE
++++++++++++++++++++
What Qualifies Islam as a Religion?
By Amil Imani
July 16, 2023
What qualifies Islam as a religion? What are the criteria
for deciding if an ideology is a religion? An illiterate Arab, some 1500 years
ago, claimed Allah commissioned him as his emissary. What’s the proof for his
claim? The Quran, the book that took him 20 years to put together and bill as
the word-for-word utterances of the creator of the universe, Allah? It just so
happened that he came up with a tremendously attractive proposition to the
forever fighting-plundering Arabs: join me, war with me, and your winning is
guaranteed: you kill our adversary, you get to keep 80% of his possessions,
including his women and children. You get killed, and your destination is
Allah’s glorious sensual paradise, where you will reside forever.
The offer caught like wildfire and, over time, engulfed the
world.
Mecca – Kaaba [Blog Editor: Non-Islamic perspectives on the Kaaba HERE & HERE]
There is no proof that Muhammad was indeed chosen and
commissioned by the author of the universe for this mission called Islam. So,
Islam is a religion because it has a prophet? Why not Nazism? Oh, because Adolf
Hitler did not claim so? What about Marx and, Engels, Mao? No, they did not
claim to be emissaries of supernatural beings.
Most religions are indeed intended to attenuate human fears.
They are based on natural worries, many of which are irrational…but natural
nonetheless. For example, many pagan religious practices were focused on the
seasonal cycles related to the harvest. Why? Because if the harvest was poor,
their entire civilization could perish or be weakened to the point where a
neighboring tribe would kill them.
While they misunderstood the scientific basis for whether
they created natural (yet irrational) religious beliefs about whether and
harvest, in this sense, religions were psychologically helpful and inevitable
in addressing natural conditions. But some religions establish for themselves
fears of things that do not exist…which the religion itself invented to create
and perpetuate fear, and then artificially addressed it to establish a
political regime.
The political nature of Islam transcends personal
spiritualism and becomes a cult of oppression. This is fraud. This is evil.
This is Islam.
Islam essentially invents the idea that Christians, Jews,
and pagans are abominations and offensive to Allah and that their very
existence represents an attack upon the self-defined Islamic right to reign
over the world. Allah thus enlists Muslim believers to eradicate by force those
who offend him and, by disbelieving, prevent his rule. [Bold Text added by Blog
Editor]
True Muslim believers, therefore, become the enforcers,
hitmen, and mercenaries for their God to establish a global Caliphate for their
parasitic clergy. Their targets are artificially constructed, adversaries.
Believers are instructed to fear the “great Satan.” They are told they are
offensive to Allah and their families if they do not follow Allah’s calls to
Jihad. It’s a “you’re either for me or against me” strategy. Contrast this
with, say, Christian fears. Christians, too, fear offending God because they
believe that God will judge their lives when their bodies die. So, their fears
are reduced by atoning in personal alignment with the teachings of the Bible.
So, as a political religion, Islam creates artificial fear
of alien groups and then eliminates the fear through war and coercion. Islam
pleases Allah with brutality and Jihad. Islam seeks to instill a political
regime to enforce its provisions. When such a political doctrine declares that
“resistance is futile,” it refers to corporeal enforcement by people. Personal
religions acknowledge natural fears and then use light, wisdom, and the
capacity of human nobility to eliminate them through a positive, spiritual
exercise.
Islam can work by brute force and by the lengths the
believers will go to perpetuate it. Its theology and practices make it
inherently evil and dangerous to all humanity. It has already spread and
infected the world like cancer. How do you nuke it out of existence? You
can’t…; they will nuke us first, I am sure it.
Warning to free men and women: remain a
spectator at your peril. It is imperative that you take a stand and do your
part in denouncing the fraud of Islam and do all you can to prevent the Islamic
fire from devouring our civilized democratic system.
© 2023 Amil Imani
– All Rights Reserved.
About the
Author: Amil Imani
is an Iranian-American writer, satirist, novelist, essayist, public speaker and
political analyst who has been writing and speaking out about the danger of
radical Islam both in America and internationally. He has become a formidable
voice in the United States against the danger of global jihad and Islamization
of America. Amil maintains a website at www.amilimani.com/. Imani is the
author of Obama
Meets Ahmadinejad and Operation
Persian Gulf and is currently working on his third and fourth book.
He is 2010 honoree of EMET: "The Speaker of the Truth Award" at the
Capitol Hill. E-Mail: No Email Available.
Copyright 2021 All
Rights Reserved NEWSWITHVIEWS.COM
.jpg)
