DONATE

Showing posts with label Women's Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women's Rights. Show all posts

Saturday, April 8, 2017

MoHR Purposed Amendments in Christian Marriage and Divorce Acts

Marriage & Divorce Among Christians


An Intro to Shamim’s ‘MoHR Purposed Amendments in Christian Marriage and Divorce Acts’

Intro by John R. Houk
© April 8, 2017 (Intro- JRH & ‘MoHR Purposed -SM)

Shamim Mahmood (Masih) addresses marriage and divorce reforms for Christians in the Pakistan legal code. The tenor of Shamim’s report is to bring Pakistan law into the 21st century with a focus on women’s rights pertaining to marriage and divorce.

I’m a bit old fashioned choosing to agree with the New Testament:

Matthew 5:31-32; 1 Corinthians 7: 10-16 (NKJV)

Marriage Is Sacred and Binding

31 “Furthermore it has been said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32 But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality[a] causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.

Footnotes:

a.    Matthew 5:32 Or fornication

Keep Your Marriage Vows

10 Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. 11 But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife.

12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her. 13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy. 15 But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace. 16 For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?

In full disclosure, I have been divorced. My first wife divorced me because my Christian beliefs did not coincide with the lifestyle she desired to live. I remarried in 1990 and have had a long happy Marriage to this very day (minus a few marital spats along the way).

Now addressing the issue of domestic wife and child abuse/battery. I definitely do advocate a married remain together when one inflicts violence upon another, even though the New Testament does not provide for consequences for such marital abuse for either the husband or the wife.

However, the New Testament has commands for the way a married life is to be conducted:

1 Corinthians 7: 2-5 (NKJV)

Nevertheless, because of sexual immorality, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband. Let the husband render to his wife the affection due her, and likewise also the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another except with consent for a time, that you may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again so that Satan does not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

All you husbands need to read the above verses to make sure there is no misunderstanding about how to treat one’s wife in these next verses:

Ephesians 5:22-29 - ff (NKJV)

22 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. 24 Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.

25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27 that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. 28 So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church.

There is no room for wife beaters among Christians. Adultery and unbelievers appears to be the principles behind divorce. BUT, if you are a man of God DO NOT allow a man to beat on his wife even if you must take matters in your own hands. Even if taking action means you at the very least call upon the rule of law to take care of a wife beater.

Ok, I know this is an American perspective. I can only imagine how women are treated in a Muslim dominated nation like Pakistan. Christians definitely need the law to be on their side in greater context in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Below, Shamim address marriage and divorce in Pakistan.

JRH 4/8/17
**************
MoHR Purposed Amendments in Christian Marriage and Divorce Acts

By Shamim Mahmood
Sent 4/7/2017 10:46 PM



ISLAMABAD: Christian leadership agreed to bring reforms in the Marriage and Divorce acts to protect women rights. The clergy, parliamentarians and civil society have agreed to bring amendments to Christian Marriages Act 1872 and the Divorce Acts of 1869 of the constitutions of Pakistan.

A national level consultation of religious leaders, civil society and Christian parliamentarians was held to discuss Christian Marriage and divorce Acts. Senator Kamran Michael, Federal Minster for Human Rights stated that the Government is aware of the need for greater protection and promotion of minority rights whether it is legislation, education, health, nutrition or violence against them. He informed that Christian Family matters among the Christian community are dealt with by the Christian Marriages Act of 1872 and the Divorce Act of 1869. Since both the Acts are centuries old and need to be reviewed as certain provisions became outdated; they smack of colonial rule. Talking to the UCANews Senator Kamran Michael said the incumbent government is committed to protect the rights of every citizens of Pakistan especially women, children and minorities [Similar Thought Pakistan Point]. He said to facilitate the Christian community across the country, Ministry of Human Rights (MoHR) [MoHR update from Pakistan Today 3/19/17] has obtained Resolutions from Provincial Governments of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan to regulate matter pertaining to Christian Marriage and divorce. He also referred first national consultation held in August 2016 wherein the same bills were thoroughly examined.

Mr. Sharafat Ali Chaudhry, Legal consultant, MoHR presented the Bill and stated that in these drafts, it has been proposed that the registration of marriage will be responsibility of the State and solemnization will be done by the Church. Age of marriage both for male and female has been proposed to be 18 years, and both male and female must be from Christian background, he further informed. Under the present applicable law of Christian Divorce Act 1869, there is only one ground of divorce available which is raising allegations against the chastity of the spouse, however, in the proposed draft, other grounds of the divorce have been proposed for the parties.

A Legal Consultant pointed out difference of opinion among different Christian religious communities. A detail discussion was held and it was proposed that more consultations are needed to have a unified legislation. It was also proposed that Representatives of National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) may also be invited during next consultations as registration of marriages is responsibility of NADRA and Christian community is facing problem in getting marriage certificates.

A detailed discussion was also held to discuss amendments in divorce. It was informed that there has been a bill in the national assembly related to health issues wherein amendment has also been proposed in the Christian Bills. Legal consultant elaborated ground for divorce and raised the issue that mental and physical illness as well as cruelty shall be included in the grounds for divorce. Numbers of ground were proposed by the participants in view of current changed social, economic and cultural situations.

Senator Kamran Michael stated that the law is for Christian community and all denomination shall unanimously approve it. He was of the view that there shall not be amendments which are in contradiction to the Bible, however, clergy may like to consider different options and grounds for divorce. He further purposed another consultation meeting in Islamabad next month wherein the amendment proposed during current meeting will be discussed.

All denominational heads from Roman Catholic, Church of Pakistan, Presbyterian, and Salvation Army, members from the civil society and Christian parliamentarians were part of the meeting and agreed to the purposed amendments. 

Be Blessed,

Shamim Mahmood



SUPPORT Shamim’s Christian advocacy in Pakistan. First contact Shamim in case he has found an easy way to donate. I like to use Western Union sending money with this LINK to the destination of Islamabad (Contact Shamim in case he has changed cities). Shamim’s email is shamimpakistan@gmail.com, Western Union may ask for Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560

Journalist, Blogger and Social Reformer
http://oiwerk.blogspot.com/
+92-300-642-4560

___________________
Edited by John R. Houk
All source links are by the Editor.

© Shamim Mahmood - MoHR Purposed Amendments in Christian Marriage and Divorce Acts


Thursday, October 6, 2016

Tabloid Smoke Means There is Fire – SOMEWHERE!


John R. Houk
© October 6, 2016

Okay, here’s some tabloid stuff on Slick Willie (aka Bill Clinton). Honestly, it is my opinion most of this stuff is conjecture based on the few cases in which Slick had to pay hush money legally or under the table because he couldn’t keep his business in his trousers.

Regardless of the truth or speculation or the unfilled blanks between the two, Slick’s skirt chasing of willing and unwilling participants is a moral blight that Crooked Hillary has spent most of her married life maliciously defaming female victims and female willing adulteresses.

Crooked Hillary has been Slick’s huge enabler rather than Slick’s betrayed by adultery wife. This makes her as much as a moral reprobate as her husband former President William J. Clinton. Deluded Dem voters look the other way out of Party loyalty. Looking the other way is SHAMEFUL!

Donald Trump probably is the perfect alternative to Crooked Hillary, but his business success (yes, including recovery from bankruptcy) and his tapping into the pulse of unhappy with status quo Americans deserves a higher opportunity than the nefarious past of the Clinton husband/wife duo elitist criminality protection.

Criminals don’t have constituents they have victims. Political criminals only care about their agenda and NOT the rule of law.

JRH 10/6/16
*****************
Bill Clinton Affair with Vice President’s Daughter: REVEALED

August 6, 2016



Within his inner circle, our 42nd two-term President of the United States has been known to have had numerous affairs during his 8 year residence at the White House.  Staffers were well aware that Bill was having a female “guest” within the Oval office when Secret Service agents guarded the entrance.  The biggest question is why didn’t Hillary Clinton demand a divorce from Bill.  Even when the Monica Lewinsky affair leaked to the public and almost lead to the first Presidential Impeachment in U.S history, why did Hillary choose to stay.

We will reveal this shocking answer and more but let’s first look at the Bill’s many lovers



In her testimony, Monica alleged that between 1995 and 1997, she had nine sexual encounters with Bill Clinton in the Oval Office while he was the residing President Of The United States.

 

Gennifer met Bill in 1977 as a new reporter for KARK-TV in Little Rock, Arkansas and began to have a sexual relationship with Billed that lasted twelve years.



A German physician and television actress, Maria met Bill through her husband, Dr. Hubert Burda, and started their “meetings” after Maria grew fond of Bill’s elegant speeches.

BELINDA STRONACH (Gawker Photo)
 

A Canadian businesswoman, philanthropist and politician, Belinda started dating Bill after sharing an “intimate dinner” in 2002.



Naomi is an Australian TV presenter best known for the East Coast edition of Today Tonight and got introduced to Bill in 2006 through a mutual friend.



Actress Elizabeth Hurley was introduced to Bill through actor Tom Sizemore and was rumored to have had a 1 year affair with Bill after flying her to the White House in 1998.



Markie helped produce a Disney Channel program marking Bill’s first inauguration.  Markie, Hillary, and Bill are known to be close friends until Bill and Markie began having “secret get-togethers in California hotels.”



As a political activist, Patricia was instrumental to introducing Bill to the L.A. Democratic Party supporters in the mid-1980s.  Their encounters grew along with their efforts to help Bill gain a foothold in becoming President.



An American actress, Gracen claimed to have had a one night stand with Bill Clinton in 1992 while she was studying acting in New York.



Eileen alleged that 23 year old future President sexually assaulted her at a pub near Oxford University.  Bill admitted to the encounter but claimed it was consensual.



A former Miss America finalist, Sally had an affair with the then-governor Bill in 1983 and was asked not to reveal the affair by a former Democratic party staffer.



Dolly and Bill had known each other since High School.  Their sexual relationship was ongoing between mid 1970s to 1992 when Bill stopped returning Dolly’s calls.



Paula sued Bill for sexual harassment and eventually settled out of court for $850,000.  In his testimony, Paul claimed Bill gave her a note with his phone number.  When she went to see him, he tried to make moves on her.



During the 1992 campaign for President, steward Christy Zercher stated Bill fondled her on the plane flight while Hillary slept just a few feet away.



Juanita Broaddrick claimed that Bill raped her when she was a volunteer on his campaign for Governor.  Norma Rodgers who shared a hotel with Juanita confirms Juanita’s claims of a sexual assault.



The current President and CEO of America’s Natural Gas Alliance, Regina came forward and admitted having a consensual relationship with Bill in the later 70’s.



Robyn was an administrator at the Governor’s mansion when Bill was the Governor of Arkansas and admitted to have a consensual relationship with Bill during her stay.



Carolyn Moffet was a legal secretary in Little Rock, Arkansas where she met the Governor at a fundraiser.  Moffet alleges that Bill invited her to his room and demand sexual acts from her.



In March of 1998, Kathleen was a White House volunteer aide who admitted on the TV program 60 minutes that Bill had sexually assaulted her during his first term as President.

 

In 1984, rock’n roll groupie Connie Hamzy claimed then-Governor Clinton said he wanted to bring her to his hotel room.  Bill naturally later denied those claims.

ANDREA CATSIMATIDIS (Left- Bill & adult Catsimatidis & Right Bill & teenage Catsimatidis)


Andrea Catsimatidis file divorce from Christopher Nixon Cox, grandson of President Richard Nixon.  It was never proven that Bill Clinton had anything to do with the divorce, but his close proximity and the grip he has on her arm makes us wonder.



Arielle Avdali uploaded the image to social media with the caption “Billy boy checking on my tatas”. The picture should speak for itself.



Eleanor, daughter of former Vice President Walter Mondale, kept a diary that detailed her romantic encounters with Bill Clinton.  This affair reportedly made Monica Lewinsky furious because Monica thought she was Bill’s only mistress at the time.



Countless women have accused Clinton of making unwanted sexual advances and sexually harassing them dating back to 1970s.



Having gotten caught lying under oath, Bill had no other option but publicly announce to the grand jury and the nation that he had in fact being lying the entire time about the Monica Lewinsky affair.  He has no mention of his other lawsuits and affairs.



The big question remains.  Despite all these public and private displays of infidelity from Bill, why does Hillary still remain in the marriage.

The answer is evident in Hillary’s Presidential aspirations.  Hillary has always had the desire to reach the highest office in the land – The White House.  It is a mere political partnership at this point as Bill, a popular former two-term president, has a huge sway in public opinion polls to help Hillary achieve this goal.

Please let us know what you think of Hillary’s persistence in maintaining the marriage in the comments below.

______________
Tabloid Smoke Means There is Fire – SOMEWHERE!
John R. Houk
© October 6, 2016
____________
Bill Clinton Affair with Vice President’s Daughter: REVEALED



Tuesday, May 31, 2016

CII Curtail Women’s Rights



Intro to ‘CII Curtail Women’s Rights
Originalist Primer on American Religious Liberty

Edited by John R. Houk
May 31, 2016


This is the first time I have read Shamim Mahmood (Masih) write an op-ed article which openly is critical of Islam. I admire his courage but he has just embarked on a dangerous path in Pakistan where the Blasphemy Law is used as a tool to persecute Christians and other religious minorities with often fabricated accusations of insulting Islam and the pseudo-prophet Mohammed.

First Shamim addresses the legislative advice of the Council of Islamic Ideology which recommended essentially to chattelize women on all stratospheres of life which includes Muslims, Christians, Hindus and etc. Then pulls some essential understanding Quranic suras that tell Muslims how to treat Christians.

Then Shamim criticizes the CII as a contradiction of religious liberty found in America’s First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (AMENDMENT IThe Heritage Guide to The Constitution)

I emphasized the clause of the First Amendment that addresses Religious Liberty. Shamim has read the interpretation of the First Amendment based on the Living Constitution Separation of Church and State. With the persecution that Christians suffer in Pakistan I can understand Shamim’s excitement about separating Church and State in totality. I am certain he doesn’t understand the repercussions of total separation.

I stand with the Originalist interpretation of the Constitution which can only be changed by a Constitutional Amendment. The Living Constitution crowd have allowed the Supreme Court of the United States to change constitutional meanings according to America’s Leftist interpretation of the way cultural mores have evolved and the way Christian memes have slowly been disallowed. America’s Left has been making huge strides in diminishing the influence of Christianity in the USA. This Christian diminishment has ended prayer in schools, ended prayers in public forums (e.g. City government or Public School sports events), removed icons of Western rule of Law such as removing the Ten Commandments from Courthouses, disallowing symbols of Christmas on taxpayer supported public property, disallowing Christmas parties or pageants forcing a name change to Winter festival or celebration, even High School Valedictorian speakers are forbidden to than Jesus for the Lord’s influence in their life and on and on! This has been the curse of the Living Constitution concept has brought upon America.

Originalist interpretation correctly does NOT Church and State BUT rather prevents the State to establish a State Religion or Church. Meaning religion (the Founding Fathers envisioned CHRISTIANITY) can influence the State BUT the State can make zero legislation forcing religion or people to worship the way the State wants you to worship. The only position the State has with religion is to protect people to worship as they please or to not worship at all if a person or people choose atheism. THIS IS ORIGINAL INTENT RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IN AMERICA.

American Originalists emphasize that NO WHERE in the Constitution or the First Amendment that the wording of “Separation of Church and State” exists. Rather the First Amendment Clauses No establishment of religion (aka Disestablishment Clause) and that religion can be freely exercised without Federal government interference.

From an American Conservative Christian perspective, I felt the necessity to explain the controversy in American Religious Liberty between Church/State Separatists and Disestablishment Church Originalists.

Related Info:

Disband Council of Islamic Ideology: HRCP; The Express Tribune; 5/28/16



JRH 5/31/16
*********************
CII Curtail Women’s Rights
CII Allowed Men to Beat Women

By Shamim Mahmood
Sent: 5/29/2016 2:00 PM

Shamim Masih: Few days back, Islamic constitutional body, Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) [Wikipedia] has proposed its own women protection bill, recommending ‘a light beating’ for the wife if she defies the husband. This recommendations spark outrage though the CII chairman soften the tone stating ‘violence’ is not permissible in Islam. As he believes that light beating does not mean violence.

Earlier CII rejected Punjab’s controversial Protection of Women against Violence Act (PPWA) [“Women's Protection Bill — A case of men's insecurities”; Dawn; 5/12/16 01:35PM] terming it un-Islamic and drafted its own bill and will now forward to the Punjab Assembly. However, the parliament is not bound to consider its recommendations. The 20-members CII proposed that a husband should be allowed to ‘lightly’ beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuse to dress up as per his desires; turns down demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods. The bill also suggested that beating is also permissible if a woman does not observe Hijab; interacts with strangers; speaks loud enough that she can easily be heard by strangers; and provides monetary support to people without taking consent of her spouse.

In a bill of 163-pages there are several bans on women, like a ban on co-education after primary educations, a ban on women from taking part in military combat, a ban on welcoming foreign delegations, interacting with males and making recreational visits with ‘Na-Mehram’ (not known [Possible meaning from Wikipedia]). Female nurses should not be allowed to take care of male patients and women should be banned from working in advertisements etc.…. The CII is a powerful body because of its influence on the political system in Pakistan. It advises the Pakistani legislature whether laws are in line with the teachings of Islam.
      
I don’t know for how long blasphemy laws allow me to speak about Islam or its teaching, but let me tell you; there is difference between women, children and minorities rights and Islamic permission. There are no equal rights for women and other minorities residing in a nation in which the Quran and Sharia Law define culture and society and its rule of law. Women’s rights given in Islam are the same as recommended by CII. Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iran are clear examples and so much so Pakistan is another Sunni Dominated Islamic country inspired by Saudi Arabia.

A Muslim apologist usually says that Islam is religion of peace and provides the rights for women, children and for the people of the Book like Christians and Jews. The Council must have given Islamic references in support of these recommendations. And I am giving few quotes from Quran about how Islam deal with other minorities, which one of my U.S. friends quoted.
   
Quotes of Quran from “The Quran and Christianity” (6/23/16):

In the Quran, Christians are generally referred to as “people of the book” and then in the various suras and ayahs (or chapters and verses) a number of references are made. In 2:120, “Never will the Jews nor the Christians be pleased with you till you follow their religion. Say: ‘Verily, Islamic Guidance is the only Guidance. And if you were to follow their desires after what you have received of Knowledge, then you would have against Allah neither any protector nor helper.”


In 3:56: “As to those who disbelieve, I will punish them with a severe torment in this world and in the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers." In 3:85: “And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.” In 3:118: “O you who believe! Take not as your helpers or friends those outside your religion since they will not fail to do their best to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely. Hatred has already appeared from their mouths, but what their breasts conceal is far worse. Indeed we have made plain to you the verses if you understand.”

3:178 states: “And let not the disbelievers think that our postponing of their punishment is good for them. We postpone the punishment only so that they may increase in sinfulness. And for them is a disgracing torment”. Hardly encouraging for the basis for a peaceful co-existence and a comfortable pluralism. Muslim love of the Quran that tells them to physically coerce non-Muslims through humiliation to convert or to kill them if they insult Islam or its prophet Mohammad is a dooms day promise toward Christians and other religious minorities in Pakistan.

CII recommendations could rightly be according to Islam but legislature is not bound to obey it. Religions are one’s own dealing with his creator but State deals with every individual’s matter and have to protect every citizen. Today, anyone can construct a mosque, synagogue or temple in the U.S. or any Christian majority country and can worship according to his faith but not in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Even if someone says that the constitution of Pakistan protects the rights of minorities but on the ground the situation is totally different, Jews cannot even proclaim their faith in Pakistan. And we are witness to the number of attacks on churches and temples and on minorities in the country.
         
Decades back, Christian majority countries have separated Church from the State matters. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution includes a clause that calls for the separation of church and state. Many people now espouse the belief that American government was designed to include “an impenetrable wall” separating church and state. The Reason would have been the same [for] the domination of religious leadership supervision over the state matters. One should learn a lesson from history, and may be tomorrow we will come up with the conclusion to do so, if we want to survive.

Be Blessed,
Shamim Mahmood

SUPPORT Shamim’s Christian advocacy in Pakistan. First contact Shamim in case he has found an easy way to donate. I like to use Western Union sending money with this LINK to the destination of Islamabad (Contact Shamim in case he has changed cities). Shamim’s email is shamimpakistan@gmail.com, Western Union may ask for Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560



Diplomatic Correspondent 
Daily Times, Islamabad
Blogger and Human Rights Activist
http://oiwerk.blogspot.com/
+92-300-642-4560
______________________
Intro to ‘CII Curtail Women’s Rights’
Originalist Primer on American Religious Liberty

Edited by John R. Houk
May 31, 2016
______________________
CII Curtail Women’s Rights

Edited by John R. Houk
Links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

© Shamim Mahmood (Masih)

Excerpt of Shamim Mahmood About Info


Greetings to you! Let me introduce myself first, though many of you are witness to my professional work. I am the only Christian journalist in this arena with diverse work experience with different media outlets like Independent News Pakistan (INP), as columnist with “Daily Times” for two years, two years with one of the leading Urdu daily, “Khabrain” & Channel 5, Daily Mail and now with Pakistan Today. I have been working as lead Reporter for “British Pakistani Christian Association” since 2010. As stringer I have worked with BBC world service. Being a Christian journalist, I have been writing on minority rights and working as a social reformer/peace maker as well.

Friday, March 21, 2014

SLMP women empowerment

Shamim Masih (right) & Christian Female Trade Craft
Sohail Johnson (Left) Shamim Masih (Right) Christian Women Trade Craft
Shamim Masih writes a human rights report displaying encouragement for upward mobility for Pakistani Christian women.

JRH 3/21/14
*************************************
SLMP women empowerment
Visible and engaged – Christian women are breaking into industry

By Shamim Masih
Sent: 3/21/2014 7:14 AM

ISLAMABAD: Research shows women wait to be invited to participate in new opportunities. They think differently than men and this difference can be a powerful source of competitive advantage. By providing women with the necessary experiential entrepreneurial training to leverage women’s unique skills and perspectives for new business creation, we can transform them from employees to employers. Access to employment is a serious problem for Pakistani Christians. Well-educated, young Christian men and women are not able to find employment.
  
The good news is that there is definitely a push to get girls into the tech arena. When a woman earns an income, she reinvests 90 percent of it in her family, meaning her whole community benefits. With the resources to establish her own business, her children receive better nutrition and improved school access, while other women and their families benefit from the knowledge she shares.

Sharing Life Ministries Pakistan (SLMP) program on women empowerment was successfully piloted in the fall of 2011 and provides women with entrepreneurial skills. By providing new skills to the degreed individuals who are interested with necessary training for new business creation, they propose helping to create new technology based company that create the jobs of the future. Sohail Johnson chief of SLMP said that we recognized that not everyone can be an entrepreneur but a key component of the program is the creation of teams that are mentored by an experienced entrepreneur who will capitalize on the individual skill sets of each participant.

Under this skill enhancement program, SLMP had trained more than 980 minority women in recent three years. Kiran Younis, 23, having 8 family members earn some reasonable amount for her family. She had never been to school because her father has low income; since she got training a chance at SLMP, she planned to send her young ones to school for an education. Mehak Shuakat, 25, joined SLMP two years back and now is earning an average income of 5000 [Rupee] per month, supporting her parents.

Schooling in addition to a fiscal empowerment brings an adjustment to a completely new generation. We wish that social rights activists will start working upon these types of collections as a substitute to losing occasion [to work] in addition to [including] methods throughout other pursuits. 

_______________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Everything in brackets are placed by the Editor

© Shamim Masih
Special Correspondents
Human Rights Activist

Snapshot of Human Rights Activism from 2011
Christian Rights Activist
Freelance Journalist
 
Secretary General of Information

Shamim Masih’s Donate/Support info:

Editor: For Americans especially, I have discovered the best way to donate to Shamim Masih is via Western Union sending to a Western Union agent in Islamabad.

FOR USD TRANSFER.
Intermediary Bank:
                        MASHREQ BANK, NEW YORK
Intermediary Bank SWIFT BIC:
        MSHQUS33
Beneficiary Bank:
                        JS BANK LIMITED
Beneficiary Bank SWIFT BIC:
                JSBLPKKA
Bank A/c # at Intermediary bank:
        70008227
Title Of a/c
                               Shamim Masih
Beneficiary Account Number:
             
  405527
Top of Form
IBAN #                                        pk80jsbl9530000000405227


FOR GBP TRANSFER.
Intermediary Bank:
                        MASHREQ BANK, LONDON
Intermediary Bank SWIFT BIC:
        MSHQGB2L
Beneficiary Bank:
                        JS BANK LIMITED
Beneficiary Bank SWIFT BIC:
                JSBLPKKA
Bank A/c # at Intermediary bank:
        00010855
Title Of a/c
                               Shamim Masih
Beneficiary Account Number:
                405527
IBAN #
                                       pk80jsbl9530000000405227



FOR EURO TRANSFER.
Intermediary Bank:
                        MASHREQ BANK, LONDON
Intermediary Bank SWIFT BIC:
        MSHQGB2L
Beneficiary Bank:
                        JS BANK LIMITED
Beneficiary Bank SWIFT BIC:
                JSBLPKKA
Bank A/c # at Intermediary bank:
        10847
Title Of a/c
                               Shamim Masih
Beneficiary Account Number:
                405527
IBAN #
                                       pk80jsbl9530000000405227