Edited by John R. Houk
Posted November 6, 2016
This batch of emails focuses on Crooked Hillary. There is
some email information on Donald Trump through the eyes of Left Wing
detractors. Newbill examines a post from a Bernie Sanders supporter that calls
Crooked Hillary an evil Neocon. I disagree with the appellation Neocon on
Hillary Clinton. I explain my disagreement on the Neocon accusation and that
Neoconservatism is not evil down below.
JRH 11/5/16
**************
Trump needs to
Identify this Person and use his Extreme ECO-Marxism to Label Hillary with an
ANTI-Economic Growth vision
10/14/2016 11:18 AM
Trump can say this shows we are Out of Balance with how
Obama and NOW Hillary want to Implement policies that will enable the People’s
access to their Rights and Liberties!!!! There is No Way we can Have a Robust
Economy that serves the people when these people want to OPPRESS access to our
Resources with Extreme ECO-Marxism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We Must EXPOSE this Hillary Clinton Campaign Manager as the ECO-Marxist. [This
ECO-Marxist represents] the People doing the Dirty work behind our Government’s
Closed Doors that’s KILLING OUR LIBERTY!!!!!!!!!!
... It was 2014, and
McCarthy, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was about to
make her case for blocking the controversial Pebble gold mine planned for
Alaska’s Bristol Bay watershed, home to one of the world’s most prolific salmon
fisheries. …
But McCarthy also knew there would
be a new player in the room. Longtime Democratic operative John Podesta, Bill
Clinton’s former chief of staff, had just returned to the White House as
counselor to Barack Obama. And Podesta had a reputation for bold conservation
policy.
…
And 10 minutes into the conversation,
Podesta broke in. He said that he and the president endorsed McCarthy’s plan,
and then laid out exactly how the announcement would roll out. McCarthy left
the room, dumbfounded and elated.
…
“Nobody in the 21st century in U.S.
government has had the influence that he has had on public lands and climate
change,” says Douglas Brinkley, a Rice University professor of history.
…
Podesta’s political philosophy was
shaped by his time at Knox College, a small liberal arts school in Galesburg,
Illinois, where he joined Vietnam War protests and civil rights demonstrations.
His first major political experience involved working on the doomed 1972
presidential campaign of liberal Democrat George McGovern.
…
Podesta also understands how public
lands can be leveraged to benefit his boss and political party. Toward the end
of the Clinton administration, he supported Forest Service Chief Mike Dombeck’s
proposal to permanently protect the remaining roadless areas on national
forests from logging, mining, drilling and other development. …
…
But as the point man for the many scandals that plagued the Clinton White
House, he got a reputation for having an evil twin known as “Skippy,” who could
be harsh and unusually direct. …
…
in 2001, Podesta and some colleagues decided to create a progressive think tank
that would be tough enough to compete with those on the political right. They
called it the Center for American Progress, and it grew into a revolving-door
powerhouse that harnessed the intellectual and political capital of the
academic, NGO, philanthropic and government communities, often shuttling people
in and out of key positions in all these realms. …
and today, it boasts a staff of 314 policy wonks, professors and writers.
“Democrats and progressives did not
have an institution dedicated to thinking up policies and finding a way to move
them into the public sphere,” …
“We called it a think-and-do tank. …”
Liberal pundits and mainstream
journalists have occasionally questioned Podesta about his think tank’s financial
and policy ties to its energy, defense and pharmaceutical company
funders. … Hansjörg
Wyss, a billionaire businessman who, for two decades, has financed efforts to
conserve public lands. Podesta’s financial White House disclosure showed he
collected $87,000 in 2013, for consulting for the HJW Foundation, a Wyss
philanthropy. The conservative Daily Caller website
accused Podesta of violating White House ethics rules for taking funds from
Wyss and then pushing Obama’s proposal to expand the area off-limits to oil and
gas drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge …
Together, HJW and Wyss Foundation
donated more than $5 million to the Center for American Progress between 2011
and 2013 ... The article is pro-Podesta
& pro-Eco-Marxist – I chose the info that demonstrates that
(John
Podesta: Legacy maker; By Elizabeth Shogren; High
Country News; 3/25/15)
The FBI and Justice Department have
launched an investigation into whether the Podesta Group, the lobbying and
public relations firm co-founded by Hillary Clinton presidential
campaign chairman John Podesta, has any connections to alleged corruption that
occurred in the administration of former President of Ukraine Viktor
Yanukovych.
…
The Podesta Group, run by John
Podest’s [sic] brother Tony Podesta, was retained by the Russia-controlled firm
UraniumOne in 2012, 2014, and 2015, to lobby Hillary Clinton’s State
Department. The lobbying firm was paid a total of $180,000 according
to public records.
…
As it was first detailed in
the New York Times bestselling book Clinton Cash, Uranium
One — which hired the Podesta Group — is the firm that funneled millions
to the Clinton Foundation as the Russian government gained ownership of the
company.
…
According to the New York
Times, Russian President Vladimir Putin had a “goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.”
The Times reported last
April:
As the Russians gradually assumed
control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013,
Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton
Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four
donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly
disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with
the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties
to the company made donations as well.
“And shortly after the Russians
announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr.
Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank
with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock,” the Times report
said.
According to the Daily Caller,
Uranium One “paid the Podesta Group $40,000 to lobby the State Department, the
Senate, the National Park Service, and the National Security Council for
‘international mining projects,’ according to a July 20, 2012 filing.”
Distancing itself from the work it
did for an organization with ties to Yanukovych’s pro-Russian regime, the
Podesta group said it hired lawyers to … READ ENTIRETY (FBI,
DOJ launch Probe into Firm of Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta; By JEROME HUDSON; Breitbart; 8/20/16)
+++
These are the Weasels
that have created Groper-gate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10/14/2016 11:18 AM
The Enemy's with-in!!!!!
Trump needs to go after these “So Called Biographers” with
the “Hey Wayne Barrett, Gwenda Blair, Michael D’Antonio, Harry Hurt and Timothy
O’Brien where’s your same Criticism of the Clintons, Bill on the Women Abuse
side and Hillary on the Breaking All the Laws of the USA Side”???????????
This Guy and all these so-called Biographers of Trump need
medication for their Bias-ism disease!!!!!!
Drawing upon extensive and
exclusive interviews with Trump and many of his family members, including all
his adult children, D’Antonio presents the full story of a truly American icon,
from his beginnings as a businessman to his stormy romantic life and his
pursuit of power in its many forms. For all those who wonder — Just who is
Donald Trump? – Never Enough supplies the answer. He is a promoter, builder,
performer and politician who pursues success with a drive that borders on
obsession and yet, has given him, almost everything he ever wanted.
Read More…
(Never
Enough: Donald Trump and the Pursuit of Success; Book synopsis of author Michael D’Antonio; MichaelDantonio.net)
I watched this Guy this Morning on The MS Media paint the
most disgusting image of Trump as a guy with a Pattern towards abusing
Women!!!!! I would elevate this “Screen Writer” Michael D Antonio “up to the
Level of” PORNO Propagandist!!!!!!
This one is awful:
Back in early March, Politico Magazine brought together
five Donald Trump biographers for a conversation over
lunch at Trump Tower. At the time, the country was just beginning to grapple
with the reality that the presidential nominee from one of the two major
American political parties stood a good chance of being a real estate mogul and
entertainer. Wayne Barrett, Gwenda Blair, Michael D’Antonio, Harry Hurt and
Timothy O’Brien knew him better than anybody, had studied him more than
anybody, had written an aggregate 2,195 pages in books.
So much has happened over the past
seven months: the crackpot conspiracy theories, the rageful late-night Twitter
tirades, the surges and slides in the polls, an onslaught of investigative
reporting that painted him as a racist, sexist, selfish, uncharitable, lying
predator. So we thought it was time, especially in the wake of “grab them by
the pussy,” for an emergency reconvening of the Trumpologists. [Blog Editor: “Trumpologists” in this case
means Leftist MSM hit squad.]
He is, the biographers said,
“profoundly narcissistic,” “willing to go to lengths we’ve never seen before in
order to satisfy his ego”—and “a very dangerous man for the next three or four
weeks.” And after that? “This time, it’s going to be a straight‑out loss on the
biggest stage he’s ever been on,” one biographer predicted. And yet: “As long
as he’s remembered, maybe it won’t matter to him.”
… READ ENTIRETY if you desire to vomit (‘I Think He’s a Very Dangerous Man for the Next Three or Four Weeks’; By SUSAN B. GLASSER and MICHAEL KRUSE; Politico Magazine; 10/12/16)
… READ ENTIRETY if you desire to vomit (‘I Think He’s a Very Dangerous Man for the Next Three or Four Weeks’; By SUSAN B. GLASSER and MICHAEL KRUSE; Politico Magazine; 10/12/16)
These People, Like the Bill and Hillary Clinton & Co.,
are a Disease on FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+++
Hillary’s Shadow
Government
10/18/2016 9:37 AM
Dear John, you need to Please talk about Hillary’s Shadow
Government that the FBI refers to in this Investigation report and say this is
why Washington does not work for the American People and Shields Hillary and themselves
from the rule of LAW!
Vault Home • Hillary R. Clinton • Hillary
R. Clinton Part 04 of 04 – pg. 56 Screen Capture
+++++++++++
The Corruption exposed
by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.
10/19/2016 3:42 PM
**************ATTENTION****************
Here is an EYE-OPENING summary of the corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.
Here is a summary of the corruption
exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.
John Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s
2016 presidential campaign Chairman. Podesta previously served as Chief of
Staff to President Bill Clinton and Counselor to President Barack Obama.
On October 7th, 2016, WikiLeaks publish thousands of emails belonging
to Podesta’s private email archives. More emails were released in the days that
followed. Below is a compilation of some of the most revealing and damaging
emails discovered:
POLICY / POSITION
Transcripts from Hillary
Clinton’s lucrative closed-door paid speeches delivered to elite financial
firms and other special interests groups (which she has refused and failed to
disclose to the public after much demand) have finally surfaced:
Clinton staff conspiring to
stage ‘leaking’ of favorable excerpts from wall street speech, in efforts to
calm down the public while leaving out more damaging parts:
Leaked private speech, Clinton:
“You Need Both A Public And A Private Position”
Leaked private speech, Clinton:
“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”:
Mocking environmentalists in
private meeting with unions, Clinton: “I want to defend fracking.” Climate
change environmentalists should “Get a life”:
Leaked private speech
transcript shows Clinton’s warm ties to Wall Street’s most powerful figures:
Clinton: “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or
complicated lives” The pressure on officials to sell or divest assets in order
to serve, she added, had become “very onerous and unnecessary”:
Leaked private speech to
Goldman Sachs, Clinton: Wall street was only accountable for the financial
crisis for political reasons. The blame placed on the United States banking
system for the crisis “could have been avoided in terms of both
misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened”:
Leaked private speech to
Goldman Sachs, Clinton: “I mean, right now, there are so many
places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do
because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe
dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs
to to restart economic growth.”
Leaked private speech, Clinton:
US will “ring China with missile defense”:
Hillary Clinton flipped her
public position on TPP after her team discussed how she would be “eaten alive”
by Labor:
Clinton speechwriter: “We are
trying to find a good way to leak her opposition to the pipeline without her
having to actually say it”:
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Hillary admits Qatar &
Saudi Arabia are funding ISIS:
Qatar gifts Bill Clinton
$1,000,000 for his birthday:
Clinton’s advisors agree to
take foreign lobbyists money: Clinton’s National Finance Director, Dennis Cheng:
“how do we explain to people that we’ll take money from a corporate lobbyist
but not them; that the Foundation takes $ from foreign govts but we now won’t”.
Campaign manager Robby Mook responds: “I’m ok just taking the money and dealing
with any attacks. Are you guys ok with that?”, “Take the money!!” – … READ THE REST (Breaking News – Wikileaks Release Exposes
Hillary Clinton Corruption; By Robert Z; The Common Sense Conservative; 10/17/16)
++++
Huma Abedin Admits to
a $12 Million Dollar Pay-For-Play
10/20/2016 11:59 AM
Hillary’s top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million
dollar pay-for-play from Morocco!
We have always known that Hillary
Clinton was for sale during her time at the State Department.
Many politicans [sic] try to do
this, but Hillary’s corruption is so massive that it’s historic.
Now, just hours after the debate,
WikiLeaks provided the smoking gun we’ve been waiting for. Hillary’s
top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million dollary pay-for-play from
Morocco!
This leaked email from the 13th
batch of John Podesta’s hacked emails shows direct confirmation that a meeting
was set up with Hillary Clinton, and it was paid for with that massive cash
payoff:
And Hillary Clinton confirmed that
the WikiLeaks emails are authentic last night during the debate:
…
Hillary Clinton can blame the
Russians and foreign agents all she wants. The emails are real, and so is the
criminal corruption. Hillary Clinton used the Secretary of State’s office to
become obscenely wealthy, and she put America’s national security at risk
repeatedly.
Hillary couldn’t apply for a job in
the federal government because … READ ENTIRETY (Day After Debate, WikiLeaks Strikes Hillary
With The Most Shocking Leak of 2016! By Kosar; Political
Insider; 10/20/16)
++++
Russia has already
Bribed Hillary!!!!!
10/20/2016 11:01 PM
What Romney says WAS BEFORE WE HAS THE RESULTS FROM FBI
Comey … and if Hillary
Clinton has already
COMPROMISED U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY. The First response by the FBI would be to
act in the best Interest of the USA and the Market and divert from this
conversation!!!!
Mitt Romney made the argument
around which everyone else danced yesterday after the New York Times exposed
the UraniumOne deal and its principals’ big cash avalanche to the Clinton
Foundation. The State Department’s approval of the deal under Hillary Clinton
wasn’t just “undue influence,” and not “a poor choice of timing,” either. “It
looks like bribery,” Romney told Hugh Hewitt last
night:
Posted by Hugh Hewitt Show
Published on Apr 23, 2015
Hugh Hewitt Interview w/ Mitt
Romeny [sic]
… READ THE REST (Romney:
“Every Appearance That Hillary Clinton Was Bribed” On Uranium Deal; ED MORRISSEY; Hot Air; 4/24/16 10:01 am)
Hillary Clinton has already been Bribed, we just did not
realize it until the Lawless FBI ran its course letting Hillary off so she
could skate into the Oval Office and Pardon her and her cohorts!!!!!
[Blog Editor: Bing
Search Link under the query “Hillary
Clinton bribed by Russia”]
+++
Hillary has already
been bribed
10/21/2016 7:05 AM
The FBI cover up through Lawless Means shows this:
What was the U.S. Asset that was used as the bribed is the
Question?
[Blog Editor: See
above summary of the same link.]
Brian Fallon recently accused WikiLeaks
of working on behalf of the Russian government to help Donald Trump. Fallon’s
Twitter barrage was full of accusations against the whistleblowing
organization, including an ironic plea for
WikiLeaks to disclose Trump’s tax returns. Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton and
her campaign have engaged in Cold War-era propaganda, primarily to deflect from
numerous cyber-attacks. There’s also the tiny issue of 20% of U.S. uranium sold
to the Russian government from a company run by Clinton Foundation donors.
Thus far, WikiLeaks, DC Leaks, Guccifer 2.0,
and apparently “Russian hackers” have managed to hack into computer networks
associated with the Democratic Party. Rather than assess why these various
cyber-attacks have taken place, Brian Fallon, Robby Mook, and others in the
Clinton campaign have leveled baseless accusations against WikiLeaks and
Russia. U.S. intelligence officials might believe Russia is involved with the
leaks, but have yet to disclose any evidence … READ THE REST (Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop
Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia; By H. A. Goodman; Huffington Post; 10/11/16 05:27 am ET)
Look at the Credits in this video, it is HUGE!!!!!
VIDEO: NEW CLINTON
EMAIL SCANDAL: State Dept Bribed FBI To Protect Hillary From Espionage Act
Indictment
Posted by H. A. Goodman
Published on Oct 16, 2016
My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an
author, columnist, and journalist www.hagoodman.com
Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia:
New FBI files contain allegations
of 'quid pro quo' in Clinton's emails:
WikiLeaks releases transcripts of Hillary Clinton Goldman Sachs speeches:
FAKE CRAIGLIST: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
Podesta Suggested Coordinating With State Dept. To ‘Hold’ Hillary’s Emails With Obama:
If Hillary has already been bribed whatever was bribed is
grounds for Impeachment as this article shows.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it
For months, I have been arguing that Hillary Clinton should be
impeached. It is all well and good to prosecute a former government official
for any crimes she has committed. Indeed, the Constitution expressly provides
for criminal prosecution in addition to impeachment. Nevertheless, for the
Framers — and, if we had common sense, for us — the imperative was to deprive a
corrupt person of any further opportunity to abuse government power. Whether
the official should also be convicted and sent to prison was not unimportant
but, in the greater scheme of things, decidedly secondary.
Interestingly, the main pushback I received upon positing this argument was not that Mrs. Clinton is undeserving of impeachment. That, of course, is a measure of the seriousness of her high crimes and misdemeanors: the e-mail scandal; the reckless mishandling of classified information that has surely exposed our national-defense secrets to hostile powers; the mass destruction of thousands of government records after Congress asked for them; the obstruction of government investigations; the serial lies to Congress and the public; the shocking failure to provide security for Americans stationed in Benghazi and the failure to attempt to rescue them during a terrorist siege; the lies to the American people and to the families of murdered American officials about the cause of the attack; the trumping up of a prosecution against the video producer scapegoated for the Benghazi attack; the Clinton Foundation corruption involving the sale of influence for donations, the favors done for shady benefactors at the expense of national security, and the use of the State Department as an arm of the Clinton pay-to-play enterprise.
Interestingly, the main pushback I received upon positing this argument was not that Mrs. Clinton is undeserving of impeachment. That, of course, is a measure of the seriousness of her high crimes and misdemeanors: the e-mail scandal; the reckless mishandling of classified information that has surely exposed our national-defense secrets to hostile powers; the mass destruction of thousands of government records after Congress asked for them; the obstruction of government investigations; the serial lies to Congress and the public; the shocking failure to provide security for Americans stationed in Benghazi and the failure to attempt to rescue them during a terrorist siege; the lies to the American people and to the families of murdered American officials about the cause of the attack; the trumping up of a prosecution against the video producer scapegoated for the Benghazi attack; the Clinton Foundation corruption involving the sale of influence for donations, the favors done for shady benefactors at the expense of national security, and the use of the State Department as an arm of the Clinton pay-to-play enterprise.
…
How could she be removed from an office she does not hold based on offenses not
committed while wielding presidential power?
These questions and the non-incumbency theory behind them fundamentally misconstrue the constitutional remedy of impeachment, which is not limited to removal from power but includes disqualification from future office. Moreover, their premise is wrong: The proceeding against Clinton would not be a presidential impeachment; it would be an impeachment based on her abuses of power as secretary of state, which would have the constitutional effect of disqualifying her for the presidency.
… Article I endows the House of Representatives with the “sole Power of Impeachment” — i.e., the power to file articles of impeachment. It further empowers the Senate with “the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” Significantly, in prescribing the standard for conviction in the Senate, Article I, Section 3 states that “no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present” (emphasis added).
These questions and the non-incumbency theory behind them fundamentally misconstrue the constitutional remedy of impeachment, which is not limited to removal from power but includes disqualification from future office. Moreover, their premise is wrong: The proceeding against Clinton would not be a presidential impeachment; it would be an impeachment based on her abuses of power as secretary of state, which would have the constitutional effect of disqualifying her for the presidency.
… Article I endows the House of Representatives with the “sole Power of Impeachment” — i.e., the power to file articles of impeachment. It further empowers the Senate with “the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” Significantly, in prescribing the standard for conviction in the Senate, Article I, Section 3 states that “no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present” (emphasis added).
Note carefully: The Constitution
does not say the impeached person must be a current officeholder. As we shall
see, that makes perfect sense: The point of impeachment is to deny power to any
person — not necessarily an incumbent official — whose high crimes and
misdemeanors have demonstrated unfitness for a high public trust.
The constitutional standard for
impeachment also elucidates that incumbency is not necessary. The standard,
prescribed by Article II, Section 4, is the commission of “Treason, Bribery, or
other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Obviously, one need not be in office to
commit treason or bribery; but if one has at any time committed these heinous
offenses, one is unsuitable for public office. The same is true, by definition,
of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a term of … READ
ENTIRETY (Impeach Clinton to
Bar Her from Holding Federal Office. It’s Constitutional; By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY; National
Review; 9/6/16 4:00 AM)
+++
Hillary Clinton:
Oliver Stone & U.S. Foreign Policy ‘Elite’
10/21/2016 9:02 AM
Oliver Stone has
penned a powerful and emotional takedown of Hillary Clinton
…
Oliver Stone has penned a powerful
and emotional takedown of Hillary Clinton, focusing on her insane neocon
foreign policy chops in a piece published in the Huffington Post titled, Why I’m for Bernie Sanders.
What follows are just a few
paragraphs, I suggest reading the entire thing:
We’re going to war — either
hybrid in nature to break the Russian state back to its 1990s subordination, or
a hot war (which will destroy our country). Our citizens should know this, but
they don’t because our media is dumbed down in its “Pravda”-like support for
our “respectable,” highly aggressive government. We are being
led, as C. Wright Mills said in the 1950s, by a government full of “crackpot
realists: in the name of realism they’ve constructed a paranoid reality all
their own.” Our media has credited Hillary Clinton with wonderful foreign
policy experience, unlike Trump, without really noting the results of her
power-mongering. She’s comparable to Bill Clinton’s choice of Cold War crackpot
Madeleine Albright as one of the worst Secretary of States we’ve had since … Condi Rice? Albright
boasted, “If we
have to use force it is because we are America; we are the indispensable
nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future.”
Hillary’s record includes
supporting the barbaric “contras” against the Nicaraguan people in the 1980s,
supporting the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia, supporting the ongoing
Bush-Iraq War, the ongoing Afghan mess, and as Secretary of State the
destruction of the secular state of Libya, the military coup in Honduras, and
the … You can read the rest of this Leftist
rant if you choose (“We’re Going to War” – Oliver Stone Opines on
the Dangerous Extremism of Neocon Hillary Clinton; By Michael Krieger; Liberty BlitzKrieg;
3/31/16 12:01 pm)
***[Blog Editor: I
disagree with Mr. Krieger that Crooked Hillary is a Neocon. Part of that
disagreement is because I believe the venom and vitriol against Neoconservatism
is based on erroneous perceptions from both sides of the political aisle. Did
Neocons make some bad decisions after 911? It turns they did. However, at the
time the concept of throwing despotic leadership to give people a more democratic
representative choice was a valid objective. The reason is history has shown
people are given a voting representative choice their government tends toward
more individual freedom. Examples are post-WWII Germany and Japan. Both those
nations developed into solid allies of America according to the needs of U.S.
National Interests. The thing Neocons didn’t count on is Islamic culture which
is totally contrary to Western Liberty, especially in the USA. Islam by nature
is intolerant and despotic of any individual choice that might run counter to
Islamic tenets. Muslims for the most part concur with their faith of
intolerance. This Muslim intolerance will factor into a mutual National
Interest benefiting the USA or a Muslim nation. The Neocon failure was finding
this out the hard way. The Neoconservative key is a foreign policy that
validates U.S. National Interests, keeps America strong and keeps America Exceptional.
NONE OF WHICH is of interest to Crooked Hillary (falsely accused of
Neoconservatism) or to uber-Leftist Bernie Sanders who author Michael Krieger
has endorsed]***
U.S. Foreign Policy
‘Elite’ Eagerly Await an Expansion of Overseas Wars Under Hillary Clinton
Comment 114647 is
Tony Newbill
Facebook has blocked me from public
comment posting of this, Hillary has already been bribed.
The FBI cover up through Lawless
Means shows this.
What was the US Asset that was used
as the bribed is the Question?
Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian
Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia. Look at the Credits in
this video, it is HUGE!!!!!
If Hillary has already been bribed
whatever was bribed is grounds for Impeachment as this article shows:
For months, I have been arguing
that Hillary Clinton should be impeached.
Read more at:http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it
[Blog Editor: This
comment is covered above in a Newbill email.]
_________________
Edited by John R.
Houk
Any text or links
enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
© Tony Newbill*
