Tony Newbill’s theme in this post is the Dem fake news of
Trump/Russia collusion to win the 2016 election as POTUS. Even though some of
this info is old news, too many people listen to the Leftist Mainstream Media
(MSM) as gospel truth.
There is some treason going on here. I pray criminal
activities are revealed so the American people can learn that the Dems main
goal is to eradicate the U.S. Constitution as we know and to continue Obama’s
dream utopia of fundamentally transforming America.
The last post is off topic to the rest of Newbill’s emails.
That post is a video of Alex Jones bring clarity to his Pizzagate disavowal
which includes a warning that there are pedophilia rings, the Clintons have a
connection and the American Left is doing its best to silence reporting either
by outright censorship or by falsely impugning reputations of those exposing
pedophilia. Take some time to watch the entire Alex Jones video.
JRH 4/3/17
***************
Newbill Thoughts in Conspiracies Inbox
Emails sent by Tony Newbill
Posted 4/3/17
Screw You James Comey – What’s Good For The Goose…
Sent 3/5/2017 9:51 PM
Hypocrisy, thy name is…
According to the New York Times,
FBI Director James Comey is reported to be requesting the President Trump
Department of Justice to refute the possibility of the FBI having intercepted
communications from Trump Tower in the latest “Wire Tapping” denial.
So lets [sic] give this request by
Director Comey some context.
It was only a few weeks ago when
the same FBI went to President Trump’s Chief of Staff and told Reince Priebus
there was no truth to media reports, based on FBI leaks, of FBI
evidence showing Trump campaign officials involved with Russian officials
regarding the 2016 election. It was all a complete nothingburger.
Details –
On February 15th while discussing another issue FBI Assistant Director Andrew
McCabe asked Reince for 5 minutes alone after the meeting. At the
one-on-one meeting McCabe told Priebus the New York Times Russia and Trump
campaign story was a “bunch of BS”.
Priebus asked McCabe if McCabe would
be able to say that publicly and get the media off his back about a
ridiculously false narrative. Asst. Director McCabe said he would check
with his boss, FBI Director James Comey. Later, McCabe called back and
said he couldn’t issue a statement about it.
Reince Priebus was simply asking
for the FBI to give truthful information about the false reports to the
public. The White House was asking Comey to deliver transparency.
Quote from the FBI to Priebus: “We’d
love to help, but we can’t get into the position of making statements on every
story”.
Oh, but now, when there are “false
wire-tapping reports” about Director Comey, now, N.O.W he
wants the Trump administration, via the DOJ, to help him out and deny the FBI
had any involvement in surveillance of Trump Tower, candidate Donald Trump or
President-Elect Donald Trump.
Now, when it fits Comey’s preferred
sensibility. Now he wants a clear and transparent record. The
hypocrisy is thick with this guy.
…
Screw you James Comey!
My advice to President Trump and
team would be for them to tell Director Comey to go … READ ENTIRETY (Screw You James Comey – What’s Good For
The Goose…; By sundance; The Last Refuge; 3/5/17)
+++
The Trump Administration needs to watch its back!!!!!!!
Sent 3/7/2017 10:28 PM
Wikileaks: CIA hackers can pose as Russians—ring a bell?
(Part-2, here)
Let’s see. The CIA claims that
Russian government hackers interfered in the US election, on the side of Trump.
But suppose CIA hackers fabricated
an operation to make it look like a Russian hack? Too far-fetched?
Not anymore.
In conjunction with their new
data-dump of CIA material, WikiLeaks issues this
statement:
“The CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s
UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques
‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian
Federation. With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its
total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind
the ‘fingerprints’ of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.”
Spy games.
A group within the CIA wanted to
shift blame for Hillary Clinton’s defeat? How about pointing at the Russians?
“Easy. We can use Russian hacking tools and fabricate a scenario. We can say we
discovered ‘fingerprints’ that point to the Russian government.”
Here is what the CNN Wire
Service reported on January 2,
2017:
“…even
as President-elect Donald Trump and his aides cast doubt on the links between
Russia and recent hacks against Democrats, US intelligence officials say that
newly identified ‘digital fingerprints’ indicate Moscow was behind the
intrusions.”
“One official told CNN the
administration has traced the hack to the specific keyboards — which featured
Cyrillic characters — that were used to construct the malware code, adding that
the equipment leaves ‘digital fingerprints’ and, in the case of the recent
hacks, those prints point to the Russian government.”
Really? We live in a world where
spies and their cronies are constantly fixing reality to suit themselves.
So now all this bravado about
discovering how the Russians hacked and stole the election blows up like a
cream puff with a firecracker inside.
Who originally hacked/accessed the
Democratic National Committee (DNC) email files and handed them to WikiLeaks
for publication? That appeared to be an insider at the DNC. But the cover
story—“the Russians did it”—floated by the CIA other US intelligence agencies
now takes on a new hue.
The CIA has worked, over the
years, to refine its ability to fake a hack-trace to all sorts of people,
including the … READ THE REST (Wikileaks:
CIA hackers can pose as Russians—ring a bell? By Jon
Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog;
3/7/17)
Trust CIA hackers who hack France’s election campaign?
…
In my previous article,
I mentioned how, according to the latest WikiLeaks CIA data dump, the CIA can
fabricate, yes, fabricate the “fingerprints” of Russian government hackers and
create the false impression that Russians hacked the US presidential campaign
of 2016.
But there’s more.
Commenting on its CIA data
dump, WikiLeaks also describes a
wide-ranging CIA espionage plan to infiltrate the candidates running in the
2012 French presidential election. These are, of course, the same CIA thieves
who assure us that Russia interfered in the 2016 US election campaign. CIA
credibility? Zero. Who has time to try to sort out when the liars might
not be lying?
“All major French political
parties were targeted for infiltration by the CIA’s human (‘HUMINT’) and
electronic (‘SIGINT’) spies in the seven months leading up to France’s 2012
presidential election. The revelations are contained within three CIA tasking
orders published today by WikiLeaks as context for its forth coming CIA Vault 7
series. Named specifically as targets are the French Socialist Party (PS), the
National Front (FN) and Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) together with
current President Francois Hollande, then President Nicolas Sarkozy, current
round one presidential front runner Marine Le Pen, and former presidential
candidates Martine Aubry and Dominique Strauss-Khan.”
“The CIA assessed that President
Sarkozy’s party was not assured re-election. Specific tasking concerning his
party included obtaining the ‘Strategic Election Plans’ of the Union for a
Popular Movement (UMP); schisms or alliances developing in the UMP elite;
private UMP reactions to Sarkozy’s campaign stratagies [sic]; discussions
within the UMP on any ‘perceived vulnerabilities to maintaining power’ after
the election; efforts to change the party’s ideological mission; and
discussions about Sarkozy’s support for the UMP and ‘the value he places on the
continuation of the party’s dominance’. Specific instructions tasked CIA
officers to discover Sarkozy’s private deliberations ‘on the other candidates’
as well as … READ THE REST (Trust
CIA hackers who hack France’s election campaign? By Jon
Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog;
3/7/17)
+++
Have You Seen This?
Sent 3/19/2017 1:04 PM
…
In the case of President Donald Trump, …
the president’s claims that he was wiretapped, that is, illegally spied
upon, by his predecessor’s administration, former President Barack Obama.
As I have written in this Newsmax
blog and elsewhere particularly of late, my client, former NSA and CIA
contractor Dennis Montgomery, holds the keys to disproving the false claims of
those representatives and senators on the House and Senate intelligence
committees, reportedly as well as FBI Director James Comey, that there is no
evidence that the president and his men were wiretapped.
Montgomery left the NSA and CIA
with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information, much of which is
classified, and sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate
government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose
that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance
on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other
justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even
yours truly. Working side by side with Obama's former Director of National
Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama's former Director of the CIA, John
Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big
Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or
other nefarious purposes.
…
[Blog Editor: The next paragraph
is the part of the Newsmax report Newbill focused on in the email.]
…
Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney
Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed
under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of
Columbia. There he laid out how persons like then-businessman Donald Trump were
illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama
administration. He even claimed that these spy agencies had manipulated voting
in Florida during the 2008 presidential election, which illegal tampering
resulted in helping Obama to win the White House.
This interview, conducted and
videoed by Special FBI Agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett, occurred
almost two years ago, and nothing that I know of has happened since. It would
appear that the FBI’s investigation was buried by Comey, perhaps because the
FBI itself collaborates with the spy agencies to conduct illegal surveillance.
In … READ ENTIRETY (Nunes
Must Ask FBI's Comey About Montgomery Mass Surveillance Case; By Larry Klayman; Newsmax; 3/19/17 01:04 PM)
+++
What does Hillary Clinton, CrowdStrike, Ukraine Russian
Conflict and Russian Hacking have to do with one another????
Sent 3/29/2017 1:14 PM
WASHINGTON — An
influential British think tank and Ukraine’s military are disputing a report
that the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has used to buttress its claims of
Russian hacking in the presidential election.
The CrowdStrike report,
released in December, asserted that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian
artillery app, resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine’s war with
Russian-backed separatists.
But the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS)
told VOA that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion.
IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report. Ukraine’s Ministry of
Defense also has claimed combat losses and hacking never happened.
…
While questions about CrowdStrike’s
findings don’t disprove allegations of Russian involvement, they do add to
skepticism voiced
by some cybersecurity experts and commentators about the quality of their
technical evidence.
…
Alperovitch, a Russian expatriate
and senior fellow at the Atlantic Council policy research center in Washington,
co-founded CrowdStrike in 2011. The firm has employed two former FBI
heavyweights: Shawn Henry, who oversaw global cyber investigations at the
agency, and Steven Chabinsky, who was the agency's top cyber lawyer and served
on an Obama White House cybersecurity commission in 2016. Chabinsky left
CrowdStrike last year.
…
In a January post on LinkedIn,
Carr called CrowdStrike’s evidence in the Ukraine “flimsy.” He told VOA in an
interview that CrowdStrike mistakenly assumed that the X-Agent malware employed
in the hacks was a reliable fingerprint for Russian actors.
“We now know that’s false,” he
said, “and that the source code has been obtained by others outside of
Russia." –READ ENTIRETY (Think
Tank: Cyber Firm at Center of Russian Hacking Charges Misread Data; By Oleksiy Kuzmenko and Pete Cobus; VOA;
Last Updated 3/23/17 11:17 AM)
Crowdstrike’s Danger Close
intelligence report is an analytic failure of epic proportions, but more
importantly, it has harmed the morale of the people of Ukraine as well as cast
doubt in the minds of the Ukrainian soldiers who relied upon the artillery app
maligned by Crowdstrike.
In addition, Adam Meyers and Dmitri
Alperovich chose to quote a pro-Russian military blogger’s exaggerated figures
of an 80% loss rate of Ukraine’s D-30 artillery caused in part by a variant of
the same malware used in the DNC hack.
The Ministry of Ukraine denies the
allegations and states that the number of lost artillery is less than 80% and
they lost no artillery due to …
READ THE REST (Crowdstrike
Needs To Address The Harm It Caused Ukraine; By Jeffrey Carr; LinkedIn; 1/16/17)
Crowdstrike, the cybersecurity
company working for the Democratic National Committee (DNC), released a report
tying “Russian hacking” to an incident that never happened, yet even after the
report had been debunked, FBI Director James Comey still referred to
Crowdstrike as a “highly respected private company” at a Senate hearing.
By issuing a still-unrestricted
report about an incident that never happened and then tying it to the alleged
Russian hacks that Democrats claim tipped the elections for Pres. Trump, the
DNC-employed Crowdstrike’s credibility deserves to be called into question,
however, despite excellent reporting by cybersecurity expert Jeffrey Carr,
Bloomberg’s Leonid Bershidsky,
and Voice of America reporter Oleksiy Kuzmenko,
the media has ignored the story and continued to cite Crowdstrike’s work… even after the Ukrainian
Defense Ministry issued a statement on January 6th, 2017 refuting Crowdstrike’s
claims.
Even more troubling than the media
malfeasance about the discredited Crowdstrike report, in testimony in front of
the Senate intelligence committee on January 10 – four days after the Ukrainian
DOD denied Crowdstrike’s report — Director Comey admitted that the FBI had been
denied access to the DNC servers and praised Crowdstrike, without mentioning
that they worked for the DNC or that their recent report had been debunked.
…
If Henry’s statement to the Washington
Post seems more political than technical, that’s because Crowdstrike
was being utilized by their clients at the Democratic National Committee to put
out a narrative about Russian hacking to use against the Trump campaign. As
later confirmed by a laudatory piece in
Esquire magazine, starting in June 2016 the DNC used Crowdstrike
executives Alperovitch and Henry as part of an anti-Trump publicity plan
related to allegations of Russian hacking:
…
The Democrats’ attempts to smear
Donald Trump with allegations of Russian involvement failed to win them the
election and by December the Obama administration was taking a number of steps
to make the incoming president’s job as difficult as possible. On December
13th, the New York Times published a major piece
pushing the narrative – without any new definitive technical evidence – that
the Russians were …
READ ENTIRETY (Fix Is
In: Comey Praised DNC-Hired Cybersecurity Firm Even After Botched Report;
By LEE STRANAHAN; Breitbart;
3/20/17)
CrowdStrike has
failed in a bid to prevent the NSS Labs endpoint security
report from going public at RSA after a court in Delaware refused to side with
the firm's arguments.
The CrowdStrike Falcon Host, which aims to combine
"next-generation antivirus, endpoint detection and response and proactive
features" to keep enterprise systems secure, is the product NSS Labs
included in both public and private testing.
However, it is allegations of
underhanded tactics and alleged poor testing methods which are at the heart of
the matter -- rather than the results themselves.
…
On February 13, the Federal Court
denied CrowdStrike's bid, allowing NSS Labs to go ahead and release the results
of the endpoint tests.
…
The endpoint security report,
available to subscribers, analyzed the security of 13 vendors which offer
endpoint protection solutions.
The vendors included in the report
were Carbon Black, CrowdStrike, ESET, Fortinet, Invincea, Kaspersky,
Malwarebytes, McAfee, SentinelOne, Sophos, Symantec, and Trend Micro.
Out of the 13, nine received a
"Recommend" rating, one received "Security Recommended,"
one was "Neutral" and two were in "Caution."
…
While 11 products were granted an
"above average" value, two were rated as having a "below
average" value -- one of which being CrowdStrike's Falcon platform.
According to the subscription-only
report, obtained by ZDNet, the Falcon Host received an overall security
effectiveness rating of 73.2 percent and a score of 99 percent for evasion
techniques tested. After what NSS Labs calls "initial tuning," the
company's solution did not alert on false positives during testing.
As a result, the CrowdStrike Falcon
Host received a "caution" rating, alongside Malwarebytes, which only
gained an overall security effectiveness rating of … READ ENTIRETY (CrowdStrike
denied bid to block security report in legal challenge against ''subversive''
NSS Labs; By Charlie Osborne for Zero
Day; ZDNet; 2/15/17 12:24 GMT (04:24 PST))
+++
Why didn't Hillary Clinton’s DNC let the FBI Look at the
Servers …?
Sent 3/29/2017 12:06 PM
We need to start asking this question .... Why didn't
Hillary Clinton’s DNC let the FBI Look at the Servers that the DNC said were
Hacked by Russians???????
As of today, many months after the election, no one has put
forth any evidence that Russia hacked anything related to the election
whatsoever. None. The closest thing anyone has even resembling evidence is the
word of CrowdStrike, the company hired by the DNC to investigate their servers,
after someone released emails showing that Democratic party officials had been
working behind the scenes to discredit and disable the Bernie Sanders campaign.
There are several problems with the CrowdStrike angle
however. The first problem, is that the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at
the servers themselves. The FBI instead just took their word for it. The second
problem is that CrowdStrike has a SIGNIFICANT conflict of interest in this
situation. Google is a major stakeholder in CrowdStrike, and Eric Schmidt the
Executive Chairman of Alphabet (the parent company of Google) was working
directly on the Clinton campaign effort. He was providing tech assistance, he
drew up her campaign plan, and he was even photographed wearing a “staff” badge
in an exclusive area during election night.
This doesn’t pass the smell test, at all.
Furthermore, the anti-Russian angle peddled by CrowdStrike
was premised on the “fact” that the malware used in the attack was of Russian
origin. As any security expert will tell you, once malware is used in the wild,
anyone can pick it up and use it (including other state actors).
CIA steals other groups virus and
malware facilitating false flag attacks #Vault7 https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
[Click Twitter link to view Umbrage Photo]
To bolster their claim, CrowdStrike attempted to draw
parallels to a supposed hack on Ukrainian artillery communications that used
the same technique. That however, blew up in their face when both the Ukrainian
military and the International Institute for Strategic Studies came forward to
debunk their assessment.
Then there is the fact that Wikileaks has been very clear
about the fact that their source was NOT Russian.
“We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that
our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party,”
The rabbit hole on this topic goes deeper, and clearly there
is room for a lively debate, but it takes a willful act of intellectual dishonesty
to treat it as a slam dunk case where the villain is clearly defined.
Anyone who has studied crowd psychology knows that one of
the most important principles of ideological contagion is repetition. It
doesn’t matter if something is true or false. If you repeat something enough
times people will start believing it. Once an idea becomes an accepted belief,
it takes on characteristics of religious orthodoxy. To question becomes heresy.
Read more here:
This article is not intended to alter your position in
regard to Donald Trump in any way. Whether you love him or hate him isn’t an
issue of global importance, nor is his political survival relevant to this
analysis. Some of the tactics being used in the push to take Trump down
however, are.
THE STAKES
Before we dive into the quagmire
that the topic of of Russia, Trump and the 2016 elections has become, it
behoves [sic] us to anchor to the stakes: Russia is a nuclear power. The
demonization of foreign nations is a precursor to war, and even a limited
conflict between the United States and Russia would kill millions (if not
billions) of people; rendering much of the planet uninhabitable for
decades. Using U.S. Russian relations as a political football in this
context is foolish and irresponsible.
THE TRUMP VARIABLE
Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential
campaign made tying Trump to Russia a central pillar of their messaging
strategy. This line of attack was predicated on comments made by Trump over the
years expressing respect for Putin. …
…
Clinton used these and other statements to
weave the narrative that Trump is “Putin’s
puppet”. The mainstream media, and left-leaning blogosphere took
that narrative and ran with it. Those who didn’t were labeled “fake news”, and
attacked as collaborators. The goal was to capitalize on existing anti-Russian
sentiment by attaching it to Trump and his supporters (and to pressure those on
the fence distance themselves).
…
THE RUSSIAN HACKING ALLEGATIONS
…
Now playing loose and fast with the
facts for political purposes is a mainstay of American partisanship, but when
foreign policy gets thrown into the mix, and “leaders” start accusing a nuclear
power of “an act of war” the
facts matter.
As of today, many months after the
election, no one has put forth any evidence that Russia hacked anything related
to the election whatsoever. None. The closest thing anyone has
even resembling evidence is the word of CrowdStrike, the company hired by the
DNC to investigate their servers, after someone released emails showing
that Democratic party officials had been working behind the scenes to discredit
and disable the Bernie Sanders campaign.
There are several problems with the
CrowdStrike angle however. The first problem, is that the DNC refused to allow
the FBI to look at the servers themselves. The FBI instead just took their word
for it. The second problem is that CrowdStrike has a SIGNIFICANT conflict of
interest in this situation. Google is a major stakeholder in
CrowdStrike, and Eric Schmidt the Executive Chairman of Alphabet
(the parent company of Google) was working directly on the Clinton campaign
effort. He was providing tech assistance,
he drew up her campaign
plan, and he was even photographed wearing a “staff” badge in an
exclusive area during election night.
…
THE LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES
The short term political utility of
tying Trump to Russia has blinded many on the left to the long term effect such
a strategy is bound to have. Consider for a moment the implications of an
entire generation being raised in the United States right now marinating in
news and commentary which frames Russia as enemy number #1 (or #2 depending on
where Trump supposedly fits). The facts and specifics won’t matter to these
formative minds. It all boils down to sentiment. This sentiment can (and likely
will) be used in ways that those fomenting it never imagined.
A recent poll by Reuters found that
a stunning 82% of Americans now
view Russia as a threat. This is a ticking time bomb.
It is a strategic error to assume
anti-Russian propaganda will always work in the favor of the political left.
Remember the original Mccarthyism. Neocon Republicans like John Mccain [Blog
Editor: I don’t agree with the author that McCain is a Neocon. Regardless of
the propaganda Neocons are patriots that used to be Leftists. McCain is a
downright GOP Establishment RINO] and Mike Pence [Blog Editor: VP Pence
is hardly a Neocon. He has been a Conservative values Christian most of – if not
all – his political career.] would like nothing more than a chance to clip
Putin’s wings, and in the right context that’s exactly what they would attempt
to do. By linking Russia to Trump (arguably one of the most hated political
figures in American history) the left is unwittingly laying the psychological
groundwork for war.
If and when the moment comes where
a Republican president decides to escalate tensions with Moscow (by direct or
proxy intervention), “progressives” will find themselves in an extremely
uncomfortable dilemma: either they get carried along with their enemies in the
wave of anti-Russian sentiment they helped create, or they try to reverse tack
and play opposition.
Reversing tack wouldn’t be easy
under any circumstances, but in the midst of a crisis it would be all but
impossible, and such protests would be easily shot down with snippets of their
own words. Hypocrisy is after all, a vulnerability in and of itself. –READ ENTIRETY (DEMONIZING
RUSSIA: THE PSYCHOLOGY AND CONSEQUENCES OF NEO-MCCARTHYISM; StormCloudsGathering.com;
3/28/17)
+++
Evelyn Farkas says ....
Sent 3/30/2017 1:07 AM
Evelyn Farkas says President Trump needs to tell the
American People if he received a Bunch of Money from the Russians to bail him
out of debt and if that’s possibly bribing leverage by the Russians and that is
this at the heart of the Russian issue
... listen to her @ 2:40, https://youtu.be/cVGp2FZmVA4?t=2m40s
Posted by GLOBAL News
Published on Mar 28, 2017
Obama aide rats on Obama: ‘I helped
spy on Trump for Obama’. Evelyn Farkas, an Obama administration insider, has
become the latest Democrat to roll over and squeal on her former comrades,
telling MSNBC that she helped spy on Trump for Obama before he left office, and
that Trump, not Russians, was the target of the illegal surveillance
+++
Blog Editor: A link was sent as a comment by Tony Newbill
under another pseudonym he uses more often these days: Tommy Tunes. The thing
is I don’t remember the comment other than it was a bit out of place for the
post it was on. Perhaps Tony/Tommy removed the comment. Nevertheless, the
comment pointed to an Alex Jones video of an episode of InfoWars
devoted entirely to elitist pedophilia. In the 1:34:27 episode Jones clarifies
his disavowal of Pizzagate but only as it pertains to the pizzerias themselves.
The clarification is that Leftist pedophiles of the Dem Party/Crooked Hillary
inclusion used those pizzerias as fundraising locations and that pedophilia
conversations undoubtedly took place in the largely ignorant pizzerias. I
placed this at the end because this entry has little to do with the theme of
the rest of the post yet is so right-on that every should watch, listen and
learn.
Posted by Ron Gibson
Published on Apr 1, 2017
_____________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets are
by the Editor.
© Tony Newbill (pseudonym)
