The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) instantly – yet very
cloaked to the American public – became America’s chief enemy after the
fall of the Communist Soviet Union (USSR). Unlike Soviet Communist attempts at
world domination, the CCP has been using a cloaked long game of a carrot and
stick agenda toward world domination.
One serious consideration is the CCP influence and tentacles
infiltrating the American Democratic Party (these day a Dem-Marxist Party).
Especially since Obama, Dem-Marxist presidential candidates have had the odor
of a Manchurian Candidate. Consider the embedded links in these Dem-Marxists:
AND NOW to the purpose of this post. Thanks to my paid
subscription to The Epoch Times (TET), I came across three emails
focusing on the CCP. The emails linked to EPOCH TV video news, commentary and documentary
eyeballing the nefarious CCP the enemy of the USA and American Liberty.
TET tends to zealously guard their copyright over fair use
doctrine. As such I uploading the videos to two platforms that assert fair use
over copyright crankiness. I’m posting to my channels on odysee and UGETube.
Let’s eschew the Communist sympathies of the Dem-Marxist
Party. Part of saving American Liberty from tyranny is to KNOW OUR ENEMY. That
enemy is definitely the CCP. Learn about the CCP evil below.
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR
generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by
selling healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of- individual,
buy some healthy, antioxidant, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE [benefits
& product INFO – (ORIGINAL PRODUCTS) HERE
& (NEW WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCTS) HERE
& HOW-TO
WEIGHT MANAGEMENT]: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
(Become a Business Influencer and MAKE YOUR OWN CASH [Business Influencers
receive own store link & better discounts with annual $40 membership])
‘“What you’re seeing in the
Philippines is one more step in China’s effort to tighten its control over all
parts of the South China Sea,” says retired U.S. Marine Col. Grant Newsham, an
expert on the Asia-Pacific region and a senior fellow at the Center for
Security Policy.
In recent clashes near the
submerged reef known as the Second Thomas Shoal, there have been cases of
Chinese vessels ramming Philippine ships, deploying water cannons, and injuring
several sailors.
In this episode, Newsham breaks
down the Chinese communist regime’s decades-long strategy to gain control of
the South China Sea, from methodical island building to deploying a combination
of Coast Guard, maritime militia, and fishing fleets to harass and intimidate
other nations.
Views expressed in this video
are opinions of the host and the guest and do not necessarily reflect the views
of The Epoch Times.’
“The steel industry is facing too
much supply and tumbling prices. Much of the problem is coming from China,
where Chinese Communist Party (CCP) policies have led to overcapacity. Faced
with this issue, the United States placed tariffs on Chinese goods, including
steel and aluminum, which the CCP has in turn tried getting around by using
Mexico as a waypoint to the U.S. market. This loophole is now being closed as
well. We’ll discuss in this episode of Crossroads.
Views expressed in this video
are opinions of the host and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of
The Epoch Times.”
“An unprecedented combination of
personal story and geopolitical struggle, history, and present, “The Final War”
follows Epoch Times reporters and top China watchers through their journeys of
awakening to the CCP threat.
To say the least, the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) is a mystery to most Americans.
But behind the party jargon,
unpredictable actions, and ever-changing face lies the Party’s vicious plot,
with America at the very heart of it.
How dangerous are Beijing’s tactics
in Afghanistan, the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Taiwan Strait? Behind the most
dire issues of our time, what is the CCP’s underlying strategy toward the
United States? Why is the Chinese regime promoting the idea of “World War III”?
As we try to make sense of the
chaotic world, when more and more evidence starts to point toward China, we are
on our way to uncovering a century-old secret.
For the first time, The Epoch Times
investigative team traces back to the beginning of the Chinese Communist Party
to reveal its 100-year plot to defeat America.
Trawling through exclusive
interviews with leading China experts and whistleblowers, an ocean of internal
Party records, and Party leaders’ own behaviors, the film reveals the hidden
truths of U.S.-China relations over the past seven decades.
Generations of Party leaders have
been executing their plan in succession. They are the masters of deceit and
decay. Hiding behind flip-flopping policies, the communist leadership is no
longer far from achieving its goal.
How did it happen? What did the
United States get wrong about China? “The Final War” answers the questions that
are relevant to every American today.
We had studied the CCP for years.
We thought we knew it inside out. But this time, what we uncovered was beyond
our imagination. It would challenge the entire knowledge system we had built
around it and shake the American people to the core.
On 5/30/22
I posted an excerpted/edited video of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
indicating Pfizer will be responsible for depopulating planet Earth by 50% by
2023. I FELL FOR IT!
I fell for it for because Pfizer’s forced released
documentation demonstrated the mRNA Jab was indeed harmful. The edited video
shows Bourla sitting next to EVIL WEF New World Order Klaus Schwab.
BUT IN FAIRNESS this short video (https://www.bitchute.com/video/sMTDYAuk7H78/)
edits out what Bourla actually said. In unedited Schwab-Bourla discussion, Bourla
said: “We've reduced the number of people who can't afford our medicine by
50%.”
NEVERTHELESS, LET’S BE CLEAR – The WEF,
Fascist oriented Corporations (Corporatism) and Marxist-Globalists have an agenda to transform world culture to bend the knee to Elitist
directives which includes decreasing the world’s population to a more manageable
compliant Sheeple.
I find it extremely sad that probably well-meaning
Conservative-Patriots utilized a Leftist editing tactic to make Bourla appear
at face value to be openly a genocidal maniac. It’s sad because Bourla by
association with the WEF and Corporatist Elitists is probably on board with Global
depopulation. His dangerous Jabs might be an indication (EXAMPLES:HERE
& HERE).
In that light shining on some darkness, here is some
transform the SHEEPLE and Depopulation posts associated with the WEF-Globalist
Agenda that does include DEPOPULATION.
JRH 6/1/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 -
$10 - $25 - $50 - $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
In the video above, which is part of a larger “Great Reset”
documentary series, Rebel News highlights the origins of the World Economic
Forum1 (WEF), its founder Klaus Schwab, and other key players,
and the WEF’s central role in The Great Reset, which
promises (read: threatens) to overturn society and life as we know it in ways
that are hard to imagine.
In summary, The Great Reset involves the demolition and
radical overhaul of several interlocking pillars of civilization: technology,
society, economy, environment and geopolitics. Food and health also fall within
these categories. Through control of these core pillars, the WEF and its
globalist allies intend to seize control of all the nations of the world and
centralize all power and wealth.
The WEF’s Plan
As noted by Rebel News, the WEF is an organization that
profits from famine and disease; it uses tragedies and fear to further its own
agenda — “one that dictates what you eat, what you own, what you think, under
the guise of a ‘sustainable future.'”
According to the WEF, capitalism is dead and we can no
longer allow for free markets. Instead, we need a top-down governance, a New
World Order, that can ensure “fair and equitable” distribution of dwindling
resources, including energy and food. What they’re really saying, however, is
that soon-to-be-useless people are gobbling up “their” resources. They see us —
you and me — as an existential threat to their luxurious lifestyle.
So, their decades-old plan is to seize control of it all,
transfer all wealth and private ownership into their own hands, and centrally
control who gets what and when. It’s important to realize that this WEF-led
cabal believes in transhumanist and technocratic principles.
What Is Technocracy?
Technocracy is at its core an economic system, not a
political one. However, it’s wholly unnatural, and therefore also requires
unnatural means to keep it going. Rather than being based on common pricing
mechanisms such as supply and demand or free commerce, the economy of
technocracy is based on energy resources, which then dictate the types of
products being produced, bought, sold and consumed.
The technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and
artificial intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check.
In essence, energy replaces the concept of money as a
commodity. That’s strange enough, but it gets stranger still. Technocracy,
which emerged in the 1930s during the height of the Great Depression, the
brainchildren of which were scientists and engineers, also requires social
engineering to work.
If people are allowed to do what they want, consumer demand
ultimately drives commerce, but that won’t fly in a technocratic economy.
Instead, consumers need to be directed, herded if you will, to consume that
which the system needs them to consume, and in order for that to happen, they
need to be more or less brainwashed. As a result, the technocratic system
requires extensive surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven technologies
to keep everyone in check.
As Schwab himself has declared on many occasions, they want
a society in which humans are merged with machine and artificial intelligence
(AI). They look forward to extreme longevity, if not immortality through
technological means.
They place no value on spiritual ideas such as the survival
of the soul. They don’t believe in the nonlocality of consciousness. If they
did, they wouldn’t believe consciousness can simply be uploaded into a
synthetic body. They believe that, through technology and AI, they will be able
to replace God and the natural order with reengineered lifeforms of their own
creation, including a reengineered humanity.
They actually believe they’re better, more evolved than the
rest of us, and this superiority gives them the right to decide the fate of
mankind. They also reject the notion of free will.2 Once you
understand this basic mindset, it’s easier to understand why they think nothing
of stripping you of your freedom and ability to make choices for yourself. As
noted by Tessa Lena in “The Mind of a Technocrat: What Drives Them?”:
“To a technocrat, a human being
is an imperfect machine, a humble meat bag that is operated by software, which
is produced by the brain. The technocrat’s understanding of life is based on a
very primitive, linear vision; it’s void of spiritual mystery …
The force driving the mind of a
technocrat is the overbearing emotional need for total control, combined with
mistrust for other people in general. They seemingly look to compensate for
their emotional poverty. (In other words, there is no reason to admire their
successes as their successes are based on theft of other people’s right to free
will.)
The technocrats’ desire to fully
control their surroundings is anxiety-driven. They simply can’t stand the
feeling of uncertainty that comes with allowing other people’s subjective
choices to play any role. They don’t trust others to do the right thing, much
like a very neurotic parent doesn’t trust his child’s ability to choose wisely
without supervision — but far less benevolently.
Their desire for control is
intensely neurotic. They are sitting on needles, so to speak (a Russian idiom
and a pun in the light of today) — and in order to dampen their anxiety, they
resort to trying to implement their controlling ambitions …
Technocrats may think they are
the cream of the crop. They may think that their brilliant vision is good for
the world. But regardless of whether they believe themselves to be the good
guys or the bad guys, their thirst for total control is a pathological,
anxiety-driven expression. They can’t stand being dependent on other people’s
free will, and so they aspire to squash it, which is not existentially right.”
Annual Meeting in Davos
Each year, the WEF holds a meeting in Davos, Switzerland.
Thousands of global movers and shakers fly in on private jets to decide how
best to stop the working class from driving gas-powered cars, heating their
homes and eating meat. Does anyone still believe that a bunch of billionaire
“elites” can make life “fair and equitable” for everyone?
Attendees include corporate executives, bankers and
financiers, heads of state, finance and trade ministers, central bankers,
policymakers, the heads of international organizations such as the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the World Trade
Organization, the Bank for International Settlements, the United Nations and
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Many academics, economists, political scientists,
journalists, cultural elites and celebrities are also invited.
This year’s meeting took place May 22 through 26.3 On
the first day, participants were treated to an immersive experience of the
metaverse in their own digital avatar. Essentially, this is where they want to
bring the masses of mankind — into a digital reality where enjoyment of
resources doesn’t involve actual use of real-world resources. For example,
rather than buying clothes for your biological body, you’ll spend digital
currency on a wardrobe for your digital avatar.
Day 2 included a discussion about how manufacturing
companies can accelerate their implementation of automation. The idea is to
replace most of the human workforce with robotics and AI. As you might expect,
this will render large portions of humanity superfluous and “useless.” What to
do with them all? Professor Yuval Noah Harari, a Schwab adviser, has stated he
believes the answer will be a combination of “drugs and video games.”4
Among the journalists invited to the 2022 meeting was New
York Times managing editor Rebecca Blumenstein. Rebel News reporter Avi Yemini
confronted Blumenstein in Davos (video above), asking how the public is
supposed to trust the NYT’s reporting on the event when she’s an invited guest.
Blumenstein refused to answer the question, thereby cementing the impression
that she’s really not there as an independent journalist. She’s part of the
event. She’s part of the club.
Additional evidence that not all journalists are equal was
evidenced by the attempt by armed WEF police officers to detain conservative
journalist Jack Posobiec (video below).5 When other journalists
got involved and started filming and asking questions, the police took off. The
fact that the WEF has ITS OWN police force should be a wakeup call. Clearly,
they’re far more than just another nongovernmental organization (NGO).
Many of the terms we’ve heard more and more of in recent
years refer to technocracy under a different name. Examples include sustainable
development, Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, the New Urban Agenda, green economy,
the green new deal and the climate change movement in general.
They all refer to and are part of technocracy and resource-based
economics. Other terms that are synonymous with technocracy include the Great
Reset,6 the Fourth Industrial Revolution7 and
the slogan Build Back Better.8 The Paris Climate Agreement is
also part and parcel of the technocratic agenda.
The common goal of all these movements and agendas is to
capture all of the resources of the world — the ownership of them — for a small
global elite group that has the know-how to program the computer systems that
will ultimately dictate the lives of everyone. It’s really the ultimate form of
totalitarianism.
When they talk about “wealth redistribution,” what they’re
really referring to is the redistribution of resources from us to them. The WEF
has publicly announced that by 2030, you will own nothing. Everything you need
you will rent — from them — and deciding factors for what you’re allowed to
rent will include things like your carbon credits and social credit score.
Gone will be the days of putting in a day’s work, receiving
a paycheck and spending it to your heart’s content. No, the digital currency
will be programmable, so the issuer can decide when and what you can spend it
on, based on the data in your digital identity. This will all be automated and
run by AI, of course, so there won’t be anyone to complain to.
What the Green Revolution Is All About
While “going green” sounds and feels like the right thing to
do, it’s becoming imperative for people to understand what the green agenda is
really all about. Shocking as it may sound, the green agenda was invented,
fabricated, by the Club of Rome (a scientific think tank allied with the WEF)
to justify a depopulation agenda.9
The need for population control is described in the 1972
book, “The Limits to Growth,”10 which warned that “if the
world’s consumption patterns and population growth continued at the same high
rates of the time, the earth would strike its limits within a century.”
Then, in the 1991 book, “The First Global Revolution,”11 the
Club of Rome argued that depopulation policies might gain widespread support if
they could be linked to an existential fight against a common enemy. An excerpt
from “The First Global Revolution” reads:12
“In searching for a common enemy
against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat
of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.”
So, in plain English, the intended result of “going green”
is depopulation. This intention is now finally becoming visible when you
consider the implications of eliminating oil and gas production without having
viable alternatives in place, which is what Biden and other global leaders are
in the process of doing.
Not only do you need oil to make fertilizer, but we also
don’t have farm equipment that can run on solar or wind power. So, food
production essentially grinds to a halt. Heavy construction machinery also
can’t run on these alternative sources of energy, so there go the
infrastructure and home building businesses.
To many, it seems these global leaders are acting out of
ignorance, but it’s quite possible their actions are intentional. It’s just
that no one wants to consider that the intention is to harm as many people as
possible — to actually rid the planet of soon-to-be “useless” people.
It may be quite chilling to realize that the climate change
threat narrative was cooked up in the late 1980s for the sole purpose of being
able to implement a global depopulation agenda without stirring up excessive
resistance. But depopulation and eugenics are at the heart of what the WEF and
its allies are trying to achieve.
The WEF even admits they’re using the Club of Rome’s
“planetary emergency plan” to provide “a new compass for nations” to follow.13 So,
the WEF and its allied nations are all following a plan that has depopulation
as an admitted intended end result.
Phase 2 of the Great Reset: War
As I discussed in “Phase 2 of the Great Reset: War,” the drums of war
are also part and parcel of The Great Reset plan. Why? Because war will
accelerate the economic collapse required before nations can “Build Back Better.”14 The
conflict between Russia and Ukraine is helping to catalyze The Great Reset in a
number of different ways.
For starters, supply chains of all kinds are being disrupted
at an unprecedented level and pace by the war between Russia and Ukraine. Fuel
shortages and inflation are also taking off. Geopolitical tensions may also
trigger stagflation, an economic situation in which inflation and unemployment
rates are high while economic growth slows.15
It’s a precarious dilemma for economic policy, because
strategies that help lower inflation can also make unemployment worse. You can
learn more about this in the March 10, 2022, Conversation article, “Why
Stagflation Is an Economic Nightmare.”16
The end result is increased dependence on government
subsidies, and this is a clear goal of The Great Reset. Universal basic income
is one planned strategy that will create dependency. It will also ensure we’re
all equally poor and unable to threaten their monopoly on power and wealth.
Universal poverty is really what they mean when they talk
about making the world “fair and equitable.” No one will have anything.
Everyone will be equally poor and dependent, without hope of ever being able to
rise into the “elite” technocratic class.
The Ukraine war is also reducing Europe’s reliance on
Russian energy, thereby reinforcing the urgency of the United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals. In lockstep with The Great Reset, policymakers
around the world are using the sanctions against the Russian energy sector to
accelerate the transition to “green” energy, the intention behind which is what
I just discussed.
Russia’s decision to block exports of fertilizer and food
crops in response to being deplatformed from the Swift system will also create
food shortages, and this too plays right into the Great Reset plan. In recent
years, we’ve been urged by Great Reset front men like Bill Gates (Not a
Scientist) to stop eating real meat and switch to synthetic lab-grown meat
instead.
Making people reliant on patented synthetic food will benefit
the globalists in more ways than one. People will get sicker, and hence more
reliant on government aid. They’ll be dependent on food produced by monopolies
and hence easier to control. And, over time, as people forget how to grow and
raise food, the ability to control the global population will increase.
In closing, Michael Osterholm’s report from the 2010 Davos
meeting, which was aflame with talks about pandemic planning, having just gone
through the 2009/2010 swine flu pandemic is quite telling. All those years ago,
he wrote:17
“I learned much in Davos, but I
was troubled by the complete lack of attention to such critical questions as:
•How do we protect global supply chains when
we face another inevitable pandemic that could bring about widespread, severe
illness? …
•How do we take the lessons we’ve learned from
our experience with H1N1 and embed them into our organizations
so they’re not forgotten?
Instead, the tenor of the
conversations at Davos was about globalization …”
Twelve years ago, the Davos billionaires, bankers and heads
of state had the opportunity to prove they were capable of stewarding this
Earth ship. But after the swine flu pandemic, they didn’t solve the problems
that had become apparent.
They didn’t solve the supply chain issues, and we had the
same but worse issues when COVID came along. The only thing they solved was how
to silence the critics. Back then, there was talk that “heads should roll”
because of mismanagement of the pandemic.
Well, no heads rolled. Everything stayed the same, and now
we’ve gone through two years of the worst pandemic mismanagement imaginable.
Now, the globalist cabal is pushing for the inept WHO to become the sole
decision-maker in pandemics, which the WHO would be able to declare at will,
based on its own definitions. We’re at a very dangerous crossroads.
We have to remember, though, that the fate of the world is
not for Schwab and the Davos crowd to decide. It’s ours. If we do not resist
their plans, we’ve made the choice to accept their version of the future.
Click
this link for the original source of this article. [Blog Editor: Dr.
Mercola’s website postings are typically only available to the public 48-hours
from original posting which in this case is listed as 6/1/22. USSA News does
news include the reference citations which I will do below.]
Author: Dr. Mercola
This content is courtesy of, and
owned and copyrighted by, https://mercola.com and its author. This content is
made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is
used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host
site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact
USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website
menu.
Government data proves that people “fully vaccinated” for
covid are developing AIDS, which is part of why you’re being distracted with
Russia-Ukraine propaganda
(Natural News)
Do Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” cause AIDS? A growing body of
government data from all around the world suggests so, and that the Russia-Ukraine conflict
is largely a distraction from it.
Public Health Scotland (PHS), the New Zealand Ministry of
Health, the Canadian government, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the
Office for National Statistics (ONS), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), and many other government agencies are quietly publishing
data that reveals the truth, but the media is ignoring it.
We already know that the “fully vaccinated” are more likely
than the unvaccinated to test “positive” for the Fauci Flu. The fully jabbed
are also more likely to get sick or die compared to the unvaccinated. How can
this be if the injections supposedly “save lives?”
In 2021, rates of AIDS-related diseases, cancers and
infections reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
increased by anywhere from 1,145 percent to 33,715 percent. This occurred right
after Chinese Virus injections were hastily introduced under Operation Warp
Speed.
Covid “vaccines” make a person more prone to catching
covid and possibly dying
Each country seems to be reporting the data differently, the
one common denominator being that they all appear to be intentionally shrouding
the truth. PHS, for instance, announced back in January that starting on
February 6, it will no longer report “cases,” hospitalizations and deaths on a
weekly basis.
The reason for this is that data clearly shows a link
between the injections and all sorts of health problems. In nearly every
category measured, the fully jabbed are sicker and more likely to die, it turns
out, which is not exactly a good marketing point for the jabs.
In New Zealand, the figures are even more striking. Between
February 12-24, the number of covid cases recorded among the fully jabbed was
22,699. By comparison, only 1,291 unvaccinated people tested positive during
that same time period.
“This means the Covid-19 injections have a real-world
negative effectiveness, and we’re able to use Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness
formula to calculate it.”
That formula, by the way, looks like this:
Unvaccinated case rate per
100,000 – Vaccinated case rate per 100,000 / Unvaccinated case rate per 100,000
x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness
Using this formula for the New Zealand data, covid jab effectiveness
is shown to be minus-94.4 percent between January 6 through
February 11. By February 24, it drops to minus-281.35 percent, meaning the
fully jabbed are 3.8 times more likely to become infected with covid compared
to the unvaccinated.
When the fully jabbed develop full-blown VAIDS, then
what?
In Canada, which saw some of the world’s most draconian
restrictions and jab mandates, new covid cases have been skyrocketing as of
late. And four out of every five new cases, or 80 percent, are occurring in the
fully jabbed.
Canadians who took the injections are, on average, four
times more likely to become infected with covid compared to their unvaccinated
counterparts; two times more likely to be hospitalized; and three times more
likely to die.
In England, the figures are similar to those published by
PHS. The case rate there is largely comprised of partially or fully vaccinated
people with very few unvaccinated people experiencing any covid-related health
problems.
Vaccine effectiveness there was found to be as low as
minus-391.43 percent among the 60-69-year-old demographic by week 13. This is
nowhere near the 95 percent effective rate claimed by Pfizer.
Keep in mind that the rate of disease and death among the fully jabbed in
almost every country where data is available is increasing precipitously over
time. This supports the notion that VAIDS is what these people are now
suffering from, and that it will only get worse over time.
The financial system is clearly careening towards a point of
dissolution.
It isn’t an exaggeration to say that the collapse itself has
already happened and we simply have not yet felt the full brutal force of the
shockwave accelerating toward us. This process is comparable to a tectonic snap
deep in the crust under the ocean. The snap happens and a tsunami has begun. It
will hit the beach front with devastating consequences and only by breaking the
habit of living in the myopic “moment” might those on the beach have a chance
to get to safer ground before it is too late.
The question isn’t “will the system collapse”, but rather
when will the full tsunami hit?
Additionally, WHAT will be the operating system that is
brought online to replace the chaos of supply chain meltdowns, hyperinflation,
scarcity and violence that will ensue?
Two Systems Clash
Already we can clearly see two opposing patterns that have
taken form, illustrated in the remarks recently made by UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres who said:
“I fear our world is creeping
towards two different sets of economic, trade, financial, and technology rules,
two divergent approaches in the development of artificial intelligence—and
ultimately two different military and geo-political strategies. This is a
recipe for trouble. It would be far less predictable and far more dangerous
than the Cold War.”
Guterres is speaking of two divergent paradigms, so what are
they?
On the one hand, there is the ideology that Guterres
himself devoutly supports which has taken on the title in recent years of “The
Davos Agenda”, or “The Great Reset”.
Guterres even went so far as to sign UN-WEF integration
treaty in June 2020 uniting both globalist bodies into one Borg-like operating
system, announcing: “The Great Reset is a welcome recognition that this human
tragedy must be a wake-up call. We must build more equal, inclusive and
sustainable economies and societies that are more resilient in the face of
pandemics, climate change and the many other global changes we face.”
While the Great Reset professes to use the current pandemic
to push through a complete overhaul of human society under a technocratic world
government, the opposing system driven by those nations not invited to
the recent “Global Democracy summit” and labelled “authoritarians” by Soros and
the Davos clique wish to avoid being sacrificed.
Where one system is premised on a scientifically managed
depopulation agenda from the top, the other system asserts the right of
sovereign nations to continue as the only legitimate basis for international
law and scientific progress to be the basis of economic ideology. The terms of
the new system were recently re-emphasized throughout the 5000 word Russia-China Joint Statement on the
terms of the New Era now emerging.
Putin himself recently laid out these terms
stating:
“Only sovereign states can
effectively respond to the challenges of the times and the demands of the
citizens. Accordingly, any effective international order should take into
account the interests and capabilities of the state and proceed on that basis,
and not try to prove that they should not exist. Furthermore, it is impossible
to impose anything on anyone, be it the principles underlying the
sociopolitical structure or values that someone, for their own reasons, has
called “universal”. After all, it is clear that when a real crisis strikes,
there is only one universal value left and that is human life, which each state
decides for itself how best to protect based on its abilities, culture and
traditions.”
What a breath of fresh air!
Compare that to Klaus Schwab’s infamous “you’ll own nothing
and be happy”.
From where did the dystopic world order of the Davos
Crowd emerge?
H.G. Wells’ Open Conspiracy
It might surprise you, but to answer that question, we will
need to jump back nearly one century into the past and meet an ageing
misanthropic social engineer named Herbert George Wells who wrote a 1928 opus
called The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution calling
for world government, and depopulation saying:
“The Open Conspiracy rests upon
a disrespect for nationality, and there is no reason why it should tolerate
noxious or obstructive governments because they hold their own in this or that
patch of human territory.”
Wells was a member of an organization called The Fabian Society which itself was
established in 1884 by a coterie of British eugenicists and Malthusians in
order to promote a new social order designed to mold society into a new
mechanized order run by a managerial elite of “social scientists” from above.
Throughout the 20th century, the Fabian Society would
penetrate all branches of government, military, academia, media and even
private corporate boards around the world creating global systems of fifth
columns operating within cells, hierarchically unified by a central command
within the highest echelons of British Intelligence.
From below, plebs and laborers would be attracted by “words”
promoted by Fabians like equality, social justice, and re-distribution of
wealth utilizing Marxist terms while never realizing that those words were just
a sweet illusion with no claim to reality.
Like Jesuitical and Masonic orders, many Fabians would never
have a clue what the machine truly was that they were merely parts of. This is
why the British Labor Party (aka: The Fabian Party of Britain) was so often
occupied by well-intended members who never had a clue what the game was truly
about. The official Fabian School that became an ideological control hub and
recruiting grounds for next generation talent (paralleling the Rhodes/Milner Round Table’s Oxford University)
was the London School of Economics.
HG Wells was explicit in his many works of non-fiction
writing in 1904: “The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and
there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the
hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failure, and not in the
selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of
the human stock lies.” (3)
Sculpting our Dreams into Nightmares through Storytelling
It is no coincidence that Wells had spent the previous three
decades innovating a new form of cultural warfare called “predictive
programming”.
Whether it was in his science fiction stories of War of the
Worlds, The Invisible Man, The World Set Free, The Island of Doctor Morrow or
the Time Machine, Wells always infused trojan horses into his narratives that
he knew would have lasting value on conditioning the broader zeitgeist.
These were simply: 1) human nature was intrinsically absurd,
selfish and incapable of resolving the duty-freedom paradox in any believable
manner, 2) science and technology would thus always be used towards selfish and
destructive ends, 3) world government is the only salvation for humanity.
The only solution to such problems was that society had to
be recast afresh according to a scientific priesthood which knew how to make
the sorts of “hard” decisions that the dirty masses would never have the wits
to make themselves. The theme of world government and collectivization of
wealth under one central command were also themes advanced by Wells who wrote
in 1940:
“Collectivisation means the
handling of the common affairs of mankind by a common control responsible to
the whole community. It means the suppression of go-as-you-please in social and
economic affairs just as much as in international affairs. It means the frank
abolition of profit-seeking and of every device by which human beings contrive
to be parasitic on their fellow man. It is the practical realisation of the
brotherhood of man through a common control”.
The Fabian Society propaganda organ The New Statesman wrote
in 1931:
“The legitimate claims of
eugenics are not inherently incompatible with the outlook of the collectivist
movement. On the contrary, they would be expected to find their most
intransigent opponents amongst those who cling to the individualistic views of
parenthood and family economics.”
While genuine socialists who truly cared about labor rights
in opposition to oligarchical forces generally didn’t get along well with
fascists, the peculiar species of Fabian socialists were always united with the
fascist cause and always strove to destroy genuine-labor movements in any
nation which they were permeating. If only those fascists could be cured of
their nationalism wrote Wells, then he would gladly champion the swastika
saying in 1932: “I am asking for liberal Fascisti, for enlightened Nazis”
Eugenics and Fascism: Miracle Solutions to the Great
Depression
While these words were spoken, the Anglo-American financier
oligarchy which Wells served had been well on its way to establishing a global
system of political economy designed to impose eugenics onto humanity through its support for Hitler. This new science of
government (with its corporatist flavor in Italy) was pushed onto the world as
the “economic miracle solution” to the horrors of the great depression of
1929-1932 (itself also the cause of a controlled disintegration of a financial
bubble).
Despite the fact that the fascist project failed in 1933 (when a central bankers dictatorship was derailed by Franklin
Roosevelt) and again when the Hitler Frankenstein monster stopped
obeying London’s orders and had to be put down, the blueprint for a New World
Order continued into the post-war age under the design of an open conspiracy.
Post-War Fascism: Making the Unthinkable Become Thinkable
One of the leading grand strategists during this dark period
was Wells’ associate (and former Fabian Society member), Lord Bertrand Russell,
who wrote in his 1952 The Impact of Science on Society:
“I think the subject which will
be of most importance politically is mass psychology…. Its importance has been
enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these
the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part,
though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema and the radio play an
increasing part… it may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade
anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the
state with money and equipment.”
“The subject will make great
strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. The
social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school
children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable
conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First
that the influence of home is obstructive. Second that not much can be done
unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Thirdly verses set to music
and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth that the opinion that snow is
white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate.
It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly
how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how
much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.”
Russell’s dystopic vision was paralleled by his friend Sir
Julian Huxley (founder of the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural
Organization) in 1946 who said:
“The moral for UNESCO is clear.
The task laid upon it of promoting peace and security can never be wholly
realised through the means assigned to it- education, science and culture. It
must envisage some form of world political unity, whether through a single
world government or otherwise, as the only certain means of avoiding war… in
its educational programme it can stress the ultimate need for a world political
unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full
sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”
To what end would this “world political unity” be aimed?
Several pages later, Huxley’s vision is laid out in all of its twisted detail:
“At the moment, it is probable
that the indirect effect of civilization is dysgenic instead of eugenic, and in
any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical
weakness, mental instability and disease proneness, which already exist in the
human species will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved.
Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for
many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for
UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and
that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is
now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
The Economic Recolonization of the World
While many think the post-war years to have been shaped
primarily by a Cold War, the reality is that the Iron Curtin was always merely
a cover to impose a complete infiltration and colonization of the minds of
citizens across the Trans Atlantic community that had given so much to stop the
rise of fascism. The focus was especially placed on the young “baby boomer”
generation who would suffer the most intensive full spectrum conditioning of
any generation in history.
While the population was driven into states of insanity
throughout the age of constant nuclear terror, asymmetrical wars abroad and
drug-sex-rock’n’roll counterculture revolutions domestically.
By the time of Bobby Kennedy’s murder, and ouster of de
Gaulle, the stage had been set for a new phase of colonialization of western
nation states via the floating of the U.S. dollar and the destruction of the
gold-reserve system that had served as the bedrock of the post-1945 Bretton
Woods system. As long as the exchange rates were fixed then economic warfare
against nations via short term speculation (which had always been a tool of the
City of London) would not be possible. Additionally, the stability afforded by
fixed exchange rates permitted long-term thinking and planning requisite to
build large scale infrastructure and other scientific projects that required
the sort of patience and foresight that short term market-driven thinking never
allowed.
Under this new age of post-1971 deregulation, humanity was
further atomized around a new idea of “value” which was driven by the notion
that individual desires unbounded by regulation “cause” creative change within
supposedly self-regulating forces of the marketplace. The more the formula
“greed=good” became embedded within the operating system of western states, the
more the broader structures of those states were commandeered by private
corporations and banks which increasingly merged and fused into each other
during an age of Darwinian “survival of the fittest”. The more that these
interconnected supranational entities merged, the more those levers of economic
power were ripped away from sovereign nation states and into the hands of
private finance beholden to forces antagonistic to humanity. During this
process, the once productive sectors of the economy that gave vitality to
nations were atrophied and outsourced abroad.
Normal rates of investment into the maintenance and
improvement of capital-intensive infrastructure seized up and industrial
sectors were shut down and moved to cheap labor sectors abroad which themselves
became new zones of modern slave labor filling western consumerism with “cheap
goods” from China and cheap resources stolen from the global south.
Where monetary growth had formerly been tied to the growth
of industrial production, the post-1971 paradigm tied monetary growth to ever
increasing rates of unpayable debt and speculative capital unbounded from the
real world.
Two Faces of Evil: WEF and Inter-Alpha Group
During that same fateful year of 1971, two other ominous
entities were created.
The other ominous entity formed in 1971 was the Rothschild Inter-Alpha Group of banks under
the umbrella of the Royal Bank of Scotland. The stated intention of this Group
would be found in the 1983 speech by Lord Jacob Rothschild: “two broad types
of giant institutions, the worldwide financial service company and the
international commercial bank with a global trading competence, may converge to
form the ultimate, all-powerful, many-headed financial conglomerate.”
What Lord Rothschild was referring to was the destruction of
Glass-Steagall bank separation laws across the Trans Atlantic which had kept
commercial banking, investment banking and insurance activities
compartmentalized in separate worlds since WWII. In 1986, this destruction of
the dividing walls in banking began with Margaret
Thatcher’s Big Bang followed soon thereafter by Canada’s destruction of the Four Pillars. Although
it took another 14 years, the final nail was put into the Glass-Steagall coffin
when Clinton destroyed the law as one of his last acts in office. After this
point, derivative contracts that had only accounted for $2 trillion in 1991,
and $80 trillion in 1999 soon ballooned to over $650 trillion when the housing
market blew out in the USA in 2007.
The Economy Becomes A Bomb
What is important to hold in mind is that through this
entire post 1971 process, capitalism itself was thus slowly turned into a time
bomb which could do nothing but collapse. This means that it is fatally wrong
to consider the abuses of globalization or the collapse now underway as errors,
but rather as the intended consequence of the system’s design itself.
The western nation states had lost their economic
sovereignty as they sold their futures for the price of cheap goods from abroad
making them addicted to keeping poor nations poor and cheap labor cheap
(developing, modernizing nations tend to result in qualified, high paid labor
not becoming of a banana republic).
And so, humanity slipped ever more into an “end of history”
cage that ultimately sought a new world order to replace the old order of
nation states and democracies that had governed the previous couple of
centuries. More centralized supranational control of nation states by the
financier oligarchy occurred behind such “free trade” agreements as NAFTA, and
Maastricht in the early 1990s.
This was of course the near unstoppable trend after the
Soviet Union’s disintegration (and the replication of western globalization
within the short period of the 1990s Shock Therapy of Russia). I say thankfully
“near unstoppable” because something very special and unexpected happened to
derail this blueprint in 2013.
A New Operating System Emerges
I am here referring to the moment that Xi Jinping made it known
to the world that China would not continue as the cheap labor hub of the west
indefinitely and instead a new program dubbed the “Belt and Road Initiative”
was unveiled as the driving force of China’s foreign policy. Soon this program
merged with the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, and won over 140 nations
of the world to its operating system with branches stretching into the Arctic
dubbed the Polar Silk Road. The multipolar system of Eurasia which had been
slowly moving forward between 1999-2013 began to take on an accelerated rate of
growth with new financial institutions, large scale infrastructure projects,
and new diplomatic platforms built up along the way.
By 2015 both Russia and China had created their own
alternatives to the U.S.-controlled SWIFT and in that same year Russia entered
Syria in defense of the principle of national sovereignty.
Now Russia and China, both encircled by the U.S. military
industrial complex, have released a powerful joint
statement establishing a manifesto for a new operating system
that enshrines the principle of sovereign nation states, and activities that
promote win-win cooperation and population growth as a bedrock of order.
So when Guterres wets his pants complaining about the danger
of two opposing systems now emerging, or when Biden’s handlers promote
democracy summits that exclude all the nations of the world who don’t want to
be sacrificed on the altar of Gaia, you can be sure that it is because
something compatible with human dignity has emerged.
Might the current freedom movements springing up across the
trans Atlantic force a shift in the elements of the political class that have
not lost their humanity to a World Economic Forum borg-like commitment to
assimilate everything into a unipolar transhumanist priesthood? That remains to
be seen.
Blog Editor: There was I wanted to share in this already
too lengthy post. I’d be surprised there were patient enough readers to make it
this far. BUT IN CASE YOU made this far, here are some sovereignty-stealing,
Liberty-robbing and depopulation posts YOU should educate yourself on:
