DONATE

Showing posts with label Andrew Whitehead. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Whitehead. Show all posts

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Charlie Hebdo could easily happen in the USA

SIPA/00701149/000002
Charlie Hebdo Victim 1/7/15

John R. Houk
© January 8, 2015

Wednesday morning three armed Muslim terrorists forced a person (female cartoonist) to enter a security code went into the satirical publication Charlie Hebdo in Paris entered a Board Meeting and massacred 12 people. I heard on Fox News that there were 11 wounded.

Charlie Hebdo’s chief Editor Stéphane Charbonnier (aka Charb – chief target), cartoonist Jean Cabut (aka Cabu), cartoonist Georges Wolinski and cartoonist Bernard Verlhac (aka Tignous) apparently asked for by name by the murderous Muslim butchers.
Left2Right- Jean Cabut, Bernard Verlhac (aka Tignous), Stéphane Charbonnier, Georges Wolinski
Left2Right- Jean Cabut, Bernard Verlhac (aka Tignous), Stéphane Charbonnier, Georges Wolinski

Vox.com identifies the other eight victims as:


Bernard Maris - French economist and shareholder in Charlie Hebdo

Michel Renaud - visiting the Charlie Hebdo offices for an upcoming project

Ahmed Merabet - 42-year-old police officer, was patrolling the neighborhood when he encountered masked gunmen outside the Charlie Hebdo building

Franck Brinsolaro - 49-year-old police officer and bodyguard for Charbonnier

Four others, including three journalists and a receptionist, are believed to have died.



Said Kouachi, 34

Cherif Kouachi, 32

Hamyd Mourad, 18

Late Wednesday night Hamyd Mourad surrendered to police claiming innocence in the matter of the butchery. Some French High School buddies (I am presuming fellow Muslims) have tried to alibi Mourad by claiming he was in class Wednesday morning. From what I could discern the police believe currently Mourad was the get-away driver. There is a familial connection with one of the Kouachi brothers as a brother-in-law.

Here are a couple of excerpts from French news outlets translated courtesy of Google:

…

[Updated January 8, 2015 at 10:44] Seven people were taken into custody in connection with the investigation into the attack occurred yesterday. Manuel Valls confirmed the news Thursday morning on France Inter. Two of them were arrested in Charleville-Mezieres, four were arrested in Reims. Another person was arrested in Genevilliers. All are described by AFP as members of the entourage of the main suspects. 

…

>> It's Charleville Mezieres Mourad Hamyd visited before being placed in custody. His family said he was at school in the morning of the attack.
>> According to AFP, the youngest of the suspects, Hamyd Mourad, 18, high school student born in Charleville-Mezieres, is suspected of having acted as a driver of the two assailants Charlie Hebdo. A classmate said Thursday morning that he was in class Wednesday, January 7th.

… (Reims / Charleville-Mezieres Mourad Hamyd went seven individuals in custody; By the Editors; linternaute.com; 1/8/15 10:44 – Text Translation Google)

The youngest of three wanted men after the attack against the newspaper "Charlie Hebdo" presented himself to the police, said the AFP in the Wednesday and Thursday night. …

Hamyd Mourad, one of three suspects in the bloody attack Wednesday morning against "Charlie Hebdo" has "rendered" to the police, said the AFP in the night of Wednesday 7 to Thursday, January 8, citing corroborating sources.

A spokesman for the Paris prosecutor's office, quoted by Reuters, for its part, insisted that the young man, born in 1996, "does not go" but presented himself voluntarily the authorities. She declined to give further details.

The man aged 18, who was the brother-in-law of one of the two other suspects, was presented to police around 23 pm Wednesday at the police station in Charleville-Mezieres (Ardennes) "after seeing that his name was circulating on social networks, "according to a source close to the matter cited by AFP. Its possible role in the attack has not yet been clearly established.

Internet posing as her classmates had previously said on Twitter that Mourad Hamyd was being with them in high school in Charleville-Mezieres, at the time of the attack, using the keyword #MouradHamydInnocent.

"He was arrested and placed in custody," said another source close to the matter told AFP, as saying that "several police custody" were being "in the circle" of the other two suspects still sought Two brothers aged thirty years.

…

The brothers are from the nineteenth arrondissement of Paris and the youngest, Cherif Kouachi, was sentenced in 2008 to four years in prison for participating in a send fighters die in Iraq. Investigators recovered to include them after finding the Saïd identity card in a car abandoned by the fugitives in the northeast of Paris.

… (Attack against "Charlie Hebdo" a knowing suspect, two brothers wanted; Text by FRANCE 24; Last modified: 08/01/2015 – Text Translation Google)

As of 8:57 AM Thursday morning the Kouachi brothers were still fugitives.


Cherif Kouachi, 32, (L) and his brother Said Kouachi, 34, (R)

The largest concentration of Muslims in Western Europe is in France. I find this a bit ironic because the French government has had a history of marginalizing Muslim immigrants especially since the nation lost its Algerian colonial possession after a brutal civil war that ended with Algerian independence in 1962.

Islam is the second-most widely practiced religion in France behind Roman Catholicism by number of worshippers. With an estimated total of 5 to 10 percent of the national population, France has the largest number of Muslims in Western Europe …

…


According to the French Government, which does not have the right to ask direct questions about religion and uses a criterion of people’s geographic origin as a basis for calculation, there were between 5 to 6 million Muslims in metropolitan France in 2010. The government counted all those people in France who migrated from countries with a dominant Muslim population, or whose parents did. Only 33% of those 5 to 6 million people (2 million) said they were practicing believers. That figure is the same as that obtained by the INED/INSEE study in October 2010.[4]

The United States Department of State placed it at roughly 10%,[5] while two 2007 polls estimated it at about 3% of the total population.[6] The CIA World Factbook places it at 5–10%.[7]

A Pew Forum study, published in January 2011, estimated 4.7 million Muslims in France in 2010 (and forecasted 6.9 million in 2030).[8]

According to Jean-Paul Gourévitch [Blog Editor: This link source in English has no info on the individual] (fr [Blog Editor: “fr” is an abbreviation for French and indication an article on Gourévitch that establishes his bona fides as a source. See **]), there were 7.7 million Muslims (about 11 percent of the population) in metropolitan France in 2011.[9][10]

… (Islam in France; Wikipedia; This page was last modified on 8 January 2015 at 09:15 – Much of the Wikipedia text in bold had links removed I felt were TMI)


[** Google Translation excerpt of Gourévitch originally in French:

Jean-Paul Gourévitch is a writer, essayist, trainer and consultant international French, born in 1941 known for his studies on migration and youth literature

…

On Africa and migration.

In 2012 he intervenes on March 10 at the conference "France in danger" 48 , 49 , 50 organized by the association-Nationality Citizenship, Identity, a "false nose" of the Bloc identity 51 ; He has lectured in March for the Association of African Students and Trainees in France (ASEAF) as part of the symposium "African Perspectives" [ref. Kiosk for the Citizen of Rennes in April 52 and was interviewed by Associated Taxpayers on Radio Courtesy November 53 , 54 . He has lectured for the association The African Presence of Friends in December 55 , and the same month for the Freemason movement The Grand Lodge of France [What?] on "African immigration in Europe, especially in France. Analysis and lighting to debunk the misconceptions” [ref. required] . …

…

… Following the publication of Migration for Dummies , he was involved in several programs: France Bleu Sud Lorraine on 12 September 73, September 18 Protestant Frequency [ref.required] , Radio Notre Dame 28 September 74, TV Liberties of 3 October 75

Debates about immigration and its cost

Jean-Paul Gourévitch evaluates the foreign population living in France in 2009 to 7.7 million people (3.4 million and 2.4 million North Africans from Sub-Saharan Africa), 12.2 % of the current metropolitan population 76. This figure includes immigrants (foreign-born) over 18 years (5.4 million), and only the children of immigrants (born in France or abroad) under 18 years (2.3 million). The original North African immigrant children under 18 years (1.2 million) account for 8.5% of all young people under 18 years in France and in sub-Saharan origin (0.8 million) 5 6%. A total of 14.1%, or nearly one child under 18 in seven of African metropolis is 77.

In an audit entitled "The cost of migration policy of France" (2010), it encrypts the cost of immigration to 30.4 billion euros annually "to the taxpayers," after estimating revenue and expenditures for the state, local government and social security (the government). The cost of illegal immigration alone represent nearly 4.6 billion euros annually 78. In 2012, a new edition assesses this time to 17.5 billion (of which 8.76 for the balance expenditure / revenue and 8.652 for the balance investment / return} the cost of immigration.

… (Jean-Paul Gourévitch; Wikipedia [Fr]; This page was last modified 6 December 2014 at 18:38 – Text Translation Google)]

In case you were not aware the closest thing to a good Muslim is one that adheres to Islamic holy writ especially the Quran which is considered the express very words of Allah delivered through the lips of that religion’s psycho-prophet Mohammed. Unlike the Jewish and Christian God of the HOLY Bible the Allah of the Quran expects his followers to avenge insults in the here and now as much the old moon-god will do so in Islam’s description of the Last Days. Hence the massacre at Charlie Hebdo was in line with the actions expected of a good Muslim. Those Muslims that tell you different are purposely deceiving the kafir, personally unknowing of their own theology, nominal Muslims that either have become secularized or are wise enough to toss out the unwholesome text of the Quran and Hadith (Thank God for the latter).

In the USA among the most deceiving Muslim groups in the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). The CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad is quoted on the Anti-CAIR website founded by Andrew Whitehead:

“…The proper response to such attacks on the freedoms we hold dear is not to vilify any faith, but instead to marginalize extremists of all backgrounds who seek to stifle freedom and to create or widen societal divisions.”

Andrew Whitehead is the first person that I became aware of that CAIR exercised Legal Jihad (aka Lawfare See also HERE) against (I say “aware” because there may have been earlier CAIR Legal Jihad). Whitehead accused CAIR of being a front group for the Islamic terrorists Hamas before the HLF trial and the book The Muslim Mafia gave smoking gun proof of such linkage.

Here is Whitehead’s answer to Nihad Awad:

Vive La France!  Today, We Are All French

We’ve now learned that Islamic-Jihad-Terrorists have attacked and murdered 12 staff and others at the headquarters of the French satire magazine, “Charlie Hebdo”. 

…

Anti-CAIR founder Andrew Whitehead has issued the following response:
Once again, CAIR calls for the stifling of free speech in the name of supporting free speech. CAIR's top Apologist for radical Islam, Nihad Awad, often attempts to paint CAIR as somehow representing American Muslims.  We note that CAIR’s membership represents far less than 1% of American Muslims and that CAIR’s support has come from Islamic terrorists and foreign governments that support Islamic terrorism. 

We note that the United Arabic Emirates (UAE) has designated CAIR a Terrorist Organization, explaining, “We cannot accept incitement or funding” of terrorism. CAIR has requested the U.S. government help with CAIR being taken off the UAE’s terrorist sponsoring list, but given CAIR’s problematic relationship with government at all levels and direct ties to terrorist groups, Anti-CAIR believes that the U.S. government should not intervene on behalf of CAIR.

Peoples of the world are entitled to examine, complement, exalt, condemn, vilify, and hate Islam as they chose.  Permission of CAIR, or any other Islamist-terrorist supporting group is not required.  Nihad Awad’s weak yet typical statement is an insult to free peoples everywhere.

We ask all press to not use CAIR in any stories.  CAIR does not speak for American/Canadian Muslims and to give CAIR a public voice is to hurt the memory of all victims of Islamism, worldwide. CAIR should be roundly marginalized because CAIR’s hateful speech, lies, vilification, fraud, and proven ties to terrorists should not have a place in the free American and Canadian press. CAIR will shrivel and die on the vine once it is cut off from the press; let us join to make it so.

Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR

ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.orgwww.anti-cair-net.org

Links:

… (Vive La France!  Today, We Are All French; By Andrew Whitehead; Anti-Cair; 1/7/15)

Nihad Awad’s response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre is typical Muslims who pretend to be the erstwhile moderate Muslim but uses word games to deflect rather than to denounce an attack in the name of Islam perpetrated according to Islamic holy writ.

As Americans who benefit from the Rights and Liberties our U.S. Constitution affords us we must never allow any kind multicultural acceptance of this purest Islam and especially not from Muslims pretending to be moderate yet truthfully support the full agenda of the Quran, Hadith and Sira.

Typically I am not a huge fan of the way the modern French have treated Americans, but I gotta to tell ya – This must be a wakeup call not only to France but to all the nations of the EU that multicultural diversity as an internal policy pertaining to Islam is a failed policy.

JRH 1/8/15

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

CAIR: Supporting America...

Anti-CAIR banner
Andrew Whitehead of Anti-CAIR is one of my heroes because he has successfully withstood the legal jihad of CAIR. Because of this it is a good idea to read his opinion once in awhile. Here is the most recent email from Whitehead.

JRH 3/27/12
********************************
CAIR: Supporting America...

By Andrew Whitehead
Sent: 03/23/2012 10:08 PM
Sent from: Anti-CAIR

Since the founding of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the majority of non-Muslim citizens of the United States have been constantly accused of “Islamophobia” (a word created as a propaganda tool used by CAIR), “racism” (even though there is no such race as “Muslim”), and “intolerance” (a word used by many groups to describe those who disagree with them without using words of substance or evidence to back up their accusations).

Our country cowers in submission, much like England, France, The Netherlands, and Germany, in that we cannot even have a rational discussion on political/radical Islam in the United States without having to gain "permission" from CAIR and other alphabet-soup so-called “Muslim Civil Rights Groups”.  Even our military services are forced to accept questionable
Muslim chaplains vetted by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), yet another front group for radical Islam.

The current state of the “Mainstream Media” in the United States is partly to blame.  Consider that the New York Times (NYT) is still believed by many Americans (and other newspapers) as the “paper of record”.  NYT articles and columnists are followed throughout the United States.  While the NYT may get it right on occasion, the simple fact is that it appears willfully wrong on the Islamist threat to our country.

This ability to overlook the obvious is not limited to the NYT. It infects any number of American papers whose reporters and editorial staff
simply aren’t up to the challenge of honest reporting regarding the fascist ideology of CAIR members and their ilk.  And really, who can blame them?  Events all over the world have demonstrated that murder and mayhem may await any paper, reporter, or social commentator who dare to take an objective look at the threat of radical Islamic ideology. (It's much "safer" to pick on Christians and Jews who are known for actually praying for those who insult their faith, not terror murdering them or their children.)

So where should we turn if the mainstream press won’t report the truth?  Due to a poor educational system and a deliberate policy of “speak no evil” when it comes to the darker side of Islamic beliefs by our local, state, and national governments, it seems that we the people are over a barrel when it comes to seeking answers from those whose responsibility it is to provide them.  If the government won’t speak
the truth regarding radical Islam, how can we count on it to protect us from the terror of radical Islam?

Even more disturbing forces are at play.  For example;
Congressman Peter King recently attended a rally in support of the New York City Police Department (NYPD).  The rally came about in response to a NYT article outing on-going investigations of various Islamic groups in the New York - New Jersey area.  Apparently, Governor Christie of New Jersey was upset that the NYPD hadn’t kissed the ring of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) unit in Newark, New Jersey before pursuing its investigation. While Governor Christie can complain over what is, essentially, hurt feelings, the underlying question that should be asked is: “Why didn’t the NYPD approach the JTTF?”  Could it be that the NYPD knows something about the JTTF that made the JTTF an unreliable partner?  Perhaps the JTTF administrators would have refused to back the investigation and label it as being “un-American”?  Was there a security issue? We'll never know because the mainstream media won’t investigate.

CAIR and
CAIR’s fellow travelers are constantly brow beating us on how oppressed "Muslims" are in the United States.  We can take CAIR at their word. The highly esteemed (and deported) CAIR Community Relations Director Bassem Khafagi (currently running for president of Egypt), said of the United States: “I loved the place I lived in, but I never loved the US, the infidel country”.  We can suppose he didn’t love the USA because he was deported following his conviction on two charges of bank fraud and one count of visa fraud.  In his running for president of Egypt, he has promised to “complete the implementation of Islamic law in Egypt. I do not hide this truth in any way, because it is in keeping with the inclination of the Egyptian people."  One has to wonder, did Khafagi bother to ask the Copts or Jews (are there any Jews left in Egypt?) how they feel about living under Sharia Law with it's well-known respect for human rights and religious liberty?  Will Friday services at the Mosque be followed by amputation of various body parts at the local mall parking lot for Sharia Law-breakers, as is very common in that paragon of Islamic jurisprudence, Saudi Arabia?  So much for CAIR’s stated position of respect for all religions.

Our forefathers bequeathed us a country founded in respect for the law and tolerance of religious beliefs.  Our enemies should not interpret our tolerance as weakness.  Our governing bodies and press should discontinue their policies of appeasement of political/radical Islam that serves no practical purpose beyond conditioning our people to accept the unacceptable.  Now is the time to
take a stand and say “no more”.

There is no law that demands the mainstream media quote CAIR and no government policy that requires CAIR be consulted on anything Islamic.

CAIR,
founded by terrorists
, is a media parasite.
Starve CAIR of exposure and it will dry up and blow away like dog dung on a hot sidewalk. 

This is as it should be.
__________________________
Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR

ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.orgwww.anti-cair-net.org

Friday, January 7, 2011

CAIR: “We Are First Defenders Offenders Of The Constitution”

Anti-CAIR Banner

It seems like forever since I have posted anything from Andrew Whitehead who was the first American able to throw a monkey wrench in Lawfare (Legal Jihad) methods of a Muslim-American group utilizing civil law to bury a critic and intimidate Free Speech. Whitehead was attacked legally by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) for fingering that organization to ties with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. After 9/11 that was a truth CAIR has been interested in obfuscating this fact. Whitehead won via a confidential settlement in which Whitehead did not have to retract one thing he was being sued for.

Whitehead’s Anti-CAIR website is continuing its expose of CAIR and below is a recent email update that was received.

JRH 1/7/10
******************************
CAIR: “We Are First Defenders Offenders Of The Constitution”

By Andrew Whitehead
Sent: 01/05/2011 11:47 PM
Anti-CAIR

On December 23, Ibrahim Hooper, Communications Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was interviewed on Press TV.  Press TV is an English language TV station controlled by the Iranian government through Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Hooper complained about law enforcement authorities training programs and went on to say: "I’m talking about twenty-five percent to 1/3 of Americans having an active hostility toward Islam and Muslims."
    
What are the facts regarding “anti-Muslim bias” in America?  From the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) (2009) the following “hate crime” percentages are reported:


Year                             Religious Group

2009             Islam  9.3%                   Jewish  70.1%   
2008             Islam  7.7%                   Jewish  65.7%  
2007             Islam  9.0                      Jewish  68.4   

    
The numbers of “victims” of anti-Muslim “hate crimes” is fairly unchanged from 2007 – 2009.  The largest group is, unsurprisingly, Jewish.  Although Jews are victims of “hate crimes” far more often than Muslims, we do not see any mainstream Jewish groups giving interviews for TV stations controlled by governments that are state sponsors of terrorism. Nor do we see Jewish groups railing against Law Enforcement or the American people for harboring an anti-Jewish sentiment or bias.
    
Is CAIR defending our Constitution when so many “Anti-Muslim hate crimes” CAIR pushes are revealed to be committed by Muslims or fabricated in an attempt to either cover up criminal activity or to falsely demonstrate that Islam and Muslims are under "attack" in the United States?
    
In the interview, Hooper's claim that “We are first defenders of the Constitution” is a pathetic joke and Hooper knows it. Consider CAIR-San Fransico's Director Zahra Billoo proudly claiming to be a "Muslim Anarchist" on her Twitter page and it can be fairly put to rest that any CAIR official has even a modicum of respect for the U.S. Constitution.
 
CAIR is either at the throat of law enforcement officials or kissing their feet, depending on the mood du jour at CAIR headquarters. This is a confusion ploy and it can work very well. The threat of being branded an "Islamophobe" can make some people turn away from the facts. FOX's Bill O’Reilly even considered CAIR-Chicago supremacist Ahmed Rehab a “stand up guy” and long ago gave up any idea of investigating CAIR or CAIR’s connections to Islamist terrorists.
     
CAIR often defensively whines over the violent actions of common street thugs and Islamic militants who have plotted, committed, or openly declared violent jihad against us. Hooper has the nerve to make the outrageous claim that 1/3 of Americans have an "active hostility" toward Muslims yet CAIR is demonstratively apathetic that 10-15% of One Billion Muslims actively support militant Jihadists.
    
In New York City, CAIR pushed authorities to levy “hate crime” charges against two men involved in a 3AM brawl with “Imam” Rod Peterson.  This “Imam” or “religious leader” has a record of arrests for burglary, robbery, and illegal gun possession. Why is it that Muslim “religious leaders” CAIR shills for seem to have rap sheets or a history of taking part in odious crimes?  One man involved in the brawl was completely cleared of any wrongdoing and the other had charges reduced to misdemeanors. Once again, CAIR failed to add another statistic in its miserable campaign to claim that Americans hate Muslims.  Despite CAIR’s tireless efforts to create discord, in 2009 CAIR could only squeak out 11 “hate crimes” against Muslims in New York City.  The Jews?  Once again, they lead the pack in the Big Apple with over 250.  Perhaps it's safer to be a Muslim in New York than a Jew?
    
The only thing that keeps civil people from pointing at CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper in public and exposing his obvious character flaws and outright lying nature is the fact that he calls himself a Muslim.  If Hooper weren’t claiming to be Muslim, he’d have been labeled just another has-been kook representing a supremacist fringe group that has pretensions of greatness based on religious bigotry. 
    
Knowledge is power. CAIR works hard to hide the facts of radical Islam from ordinary Americans.  If the majority of Americans ever wake up to the truth of CAIR, we can be sure that the call for CAIR’s removal from our shores would ring so loud that every local, state, and national law enforcement agency would be forced to act.
    
The large majority of Muslims in America and around the world know that fascist, political Islam is not compatible with our Constitution and it never will be. This is what attracts many to our shores. They know that fanatical religious police cannot bother them here, that accusations of blasphemy will not result in stoning, or that their body parts cannot be cut off for theft, real or imagined. They are Free.
    
CAIR and Hooper have breathlessly pushed the lie of "Islamophobia" and continuously fail to prove it actually exists. Where CAIR finds "Islamophobia", the reality is often nothing more than Americans showing concern for radical Islamist groups involving themselves in endeavors that are designed to weaken our Constitution or promote the ideals of Islamist supremacy. Hooper can thank himself, his organization, and his fellow travelers for any “misunderstandings” Americans have regarding Islam.


Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR

ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org
www.anti-cair-net.org
_____________________________________
Story Links: