Dissenting Medical Tyranny toon (“DISSENTING” added by Blog Editor – grrrgraphics.com Photo)
John R. Houk, Blog Editor
December 4, 2024
I was annoyed to discover that my 12/2/24 post on the Blogger platform (1 of 3 platforms I post on) deleted the post entitled, “VIDEOS: Awaiting Trump Medical Tyranny Reform” (Because of censorship, can be viewed HERE or HERE). The censorship reasoning typical of Leftist-owned Big Tech corporations is that anything that counters a Big Pharma or a Globalist NARRATIVE must be MIS-DIS-MAL-Information propaganda.
FORTUNATELY the revelations of time has proven the NARATIVE is the ACTUAL MIS-DIS-MAL-Information propaganda. This post is a cross post justifying DISSENT to the official health NARRATIVE which is a LIE.
My suspicion is Blogger might censor this post. In that case be sure to check out The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right and/or John’s Newsletter Substack.
JRH 12/4/24
READER SUPPORTED!
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com
>>DRINK COFFEE-MANAGE WEIGHT-MAKE SOME HOLIDAY CASH<<
*************************
Bombshell US House investigative report confirms that almost everything the alternative media said about COVID origins, lockdowns, masks, vaccines and government overreach was TRUE
By Mike Adams
December 2, 2024
Child-Window-Mask-Isolation-Covid-19 (Natural News Photo)
So four years after the COVID pandemic nightmare was unleashed upon America by a cabal of junk science tyrants and power-hungry vax-o-crats, the US House has just released a damning, detailed investigative report that reveals the independent media was right all along.
COVID was engineered in a lab.
Mask demands and vaccine mandates were based on junk science.
Lockdowns were completely made up by self-appointed scientism authoritarians.
The government covered up the truth and pushed disinformation propaganda on purpose.
Dr. Fauci and others were guilty as hell.
So all the censorship by Big Tech turns out to be truly malicious and even harmful to the public. And the entire corporate media was nothing but an organized cabal of liars and profiteers... brought to you by Pfizer.
This investigative report reveals that COVID was a crime scene, and the government conspired with Big Tech and mainstream media to commit numerous crimes of cognitive assault (psyops), medial violence (vaccines) and hospital homicide against the American people.
So when do the mass arrests begin? (Don't hold your breath.)
Unfortunately, no one can bring back the estimated 1.2 million Americans who were killed by the jabs because they "believed the science."
Fortunately for you and I, we never believed the plandemic hype in the first place, and we most certainly didn't follow the herd into getting jabbed, masked and locked down.
It turns out that was a tremendously valuable choice of actions on our part.
Summary findings of the report
The official report, found here (PDF), is over 500 pages in length. I used our Brighteon.AI LLM engine to distill it down to just the most important points, and that summary is shown below. Naturally, the report insists that Operation Warp Speed somehow saved millions of lives, which is of course nonsense [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]. But this limited hangout of COVID truth is nevertheless rather valuable (and entirely unexpected from the US House).
After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward
Chairman Brad Wenstrup's Final Report
December 4, 2024
The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has conducted an extensive review of the pandemic to identify key failures, successes, and lessons learned. This report aims to provide a roadmap for better preparation and response in future pandemics.
I. Introduction
Chairman Brad Wenstrup's tenure as head of the Select Subcommittee was marked by bipartisan cooperation and a commitment to transparency. Over five years, the subcommittee investigated numerous aspects of the pandemic, including its origins, government responses, vaccine development, and economic impact.
II. The Origins of COVID-19
The report highlights several critical findings regarding the origin of SARS-CoV-2:
Laboratory Accident Theory: There is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 emerged due to a laboratory accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
EcoHealth Alliance and Dr. Peter Daszak: Both entities should never receive U.S. taxpayer funds again, given their questionable practices and lack of transparency.
Funding for Gain-of-Function Research: The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded gain-of-function research at the WIV, which may have contributed to the pandemic's emergence.
III. Government Response Failures
The report identifies significant issues with government responses:
Fraud and Abuse: Rampant fraud, waste, and abuse plagued the COVID-19 response.
Pandemic-Era School Closures: These closures had a lasting negative impact on children’s education and mental health.
Misinformation Campaigns: Public health officials often mischaracterized scientific information, leading to public mistrust.
IV. The Role of Public Health Officials
The report criticizes the actions of key public health figures:
Dr. Anthony Fauci: Played a role in downplaying the lab leak theory and covered up facts.
Operation Warp Speed: While successful, it was marred by political interference and lack of transparency.
V. Economic Impact
The pandemic had severe economic consequences:
Business Closures: Mandatory lockdowns led to temporary and permanent closures, disproportionately affecting rural and low-income areas.
Unemployment: The pandemic exacerbated existing inequalities in the job market.
Supply Chain Issues: A lack of supply chain diversity hindered recovery efforts.
VI. Vaccine Development and Distribution
The report evaluates vaccine development:
Operation Warp Speed Success: Rapid vaccine development saved millions of lives, but was subject to political pressure.
Vaccine Mandates: Not supported by science and caused more harm than good, including disrupting military readiness.
Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS): Inadequate and not transparent in reporting potential side effects.
VII. School Closures
The subcommittee found that pandemic-era school closures were not justified by scientific evidence:
Long-Term Impacts: Disrupted education, increased mental health issues, and worsened physical health.
American Federation of Teachers (AFT): Advocated for overly broad mitigation measures without sufficient scientific basis.
VIII. Accountability and Transparency
The report calls for greater accountability and transparency in government agencies:
Executive Branch Obstruction: The Biden administration obstructed investigations into the origins of COVID-19.
EcoHealth Alliance Misconduct: Engaged in obstruction, misleading public statements, and document tampering.
IX. Recommendations for Future Preparedness
The report recommends several steps to better prepare for future pandemics:
Independent Oversight: Establish independent oversight bodies to ensure transparency and accountability.
Enhanced Communication: Improve communication between scientists, policymakers, and the public.
Preparedness Plans: Develop comprehensive preparedness plans that include stockpiling medical supplies and diversifying supply chains.
Conclusion
Chairman Wenstrup emphasizes the need for a whole-of-America response managed by unbiased leaders who prioritize transparency, accountability, and integrity. The lessons learned from this pandemic highlight the importance of better preparation, more effective communication, and stronger oversight in future public health emergencies.
The full report includes detailed findings on each topic discussed and is intended to serve as a roadmap for addressing future pandemics. It underscores the critical role of trust, transparency, and bipartisan cooperation in managing such crises effectively.
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic
This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. … All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
++++++++++++++++++++++
‘Truth Is Becoming More Obvious’: Author of New Peer-reviewed Study Calls for Moratorium on COVID mRNA Vaccines
Based on incomplete data, “serious safety concerns,” and potential long-term risks, the authors of a new peer-reviewed study recommend “at minimum” a moratorium on Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines.
December 3, 2024
COVID-19 Vaxx Moratorium (The Defender Photo)
A new peer-reviewed study calling for a moratorium on mRNA COVID-19 vaccines adds to a growing chorus of voices demanding that public health officials hit the pause button on the shots until definitive safety studies are performed.
The study, published in the winter 2024 edition of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, analyzed COVID-19 vaccine and booster data from Pfizer and BioNTech. The authors concluded that “at minimum,” health officials should institute a moratorium on the shots.
Based on incomplete data, “serious safety concerns,” and potential long-term risks, the authors recommend a moratorium on Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 modRNA (modified RNA) vaccines, according to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, administrator of the McCullough Foundation, who analyzed the study in a Substack post.
The foundation’s founder, Dr. Peter McCullough, was one of the study’s authors.
According to the study, the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 shot is a gene therapy “misclassified as a traditional vaccine.” The study also highlighted a lack of toxicology and carcinogenicity testing, deficient clinical trials, regulatory oversight failures and safety concerns relating to the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles in the shots.
“Early on in the pandemic, we and other scientific bodies had been calling upon the government agencies to halt the mRNA shots. Every time, we were ignored. As more evidence is being accumulated, the truth is becoming more obvious,” said Philip R. Oldfield, Ph.D., lead author of the study.
The latest call for a moratorium adds to the list of scientists and organizations that have supported halting the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines — including Florida’s surgeon general, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Doctors for COVID Ethics, Americans for Health Freedom and the World Council for Health.
In October, Idaho’s health board voted to stop offering COVID-19 vaccines at its 30 clinics because of safety concerns. Also that month, the Slovak government issued a report proposing a ban on “dangerous” mRNA vaccines.
Another study, published Nov. 29 in Cell Host & Microbe, found that the persistent presence of spike protein at the blood-brain barrier may lead to significant neurological damage — although this study also claims that the vaccine reduces the presence of spike protein in the body.
Hulscher told The Defender:
“Spike protein is a highly toxic substance that causes damage to all organ systems. We can connect spike protein to vaccine-related deaths and serious adverse events as it’s been directly found in the brain, adrenal glands, heart and blood of injured and deceased individuals.”
Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, told The Defender that either of the two new studies is enough to justify the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccines for non-lethal viruses.”
“Both studies confirm what we know about the increasing number of people who seem to progress to severe neurological diseases and rapid dementia after the shots,” Dalgleish said.
Christof Plothe, D.O., a member of the World Council for Health’s steering committee, told The Defender the studies are a “very important summary of major aspects pointing at the scientifically and morally unacceptable flaws of the continuation of a gene therapy experiment for three-quarters of humanity.”
Public health agencies ‘chose not to’ pay attention to vaccine risks
The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons study found that COVID-19 shots never should have been classified as vaccines.
“The COVID-19 modRNA vaccines are not classified as gene therapy products, whereas an mRNA vaccine against a non-infectious disease such as cancer is not classified as a mRNA vaccine, but as a gene therapy product,” the study noted.
According to the study, this distinction is significant because of the different regulatory requirements for vaccines compared to gene therapy products “It is a regulatory requirement for manufacturers of a gene therapy product to determine the structure, concentration, and biodistribution of the protein … However, that was not the case for Pfizer-BioNTech’s BNT162b2 [COVID-19 vaccine], as it was misclassified as a traditional vaccine,” the study said.
The study also noted deficiencies during clinical trials. According to Hulscher, the trials “failed to measure critical factors like the amount and variability of spike protein produced in individuals.” He said placebo groups in initial trials were unblinded early, “undermining the integrity of long-term safety and efficacy data.”
The study also noted the “high mortality rate” of 1,223 deaths in the three months after the introduction of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot, in addition to thousands of patients who were classified as “unknown” or who had not recovered as of the time of Pfizer-BioNTech’s initial post-marketing report.
According to the study:
“Such a high mortality rate following medical intervention would have resulted in having any other medicinal product taken off the market immediately. Therefore, the question must be asked: Why were the modRNA vaccines allowed to remain in use?”
Pfizer also “did not conduct genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies, despite the potential for the spike protein and LNPs [lipid nanoparticles] to cause harm,” Hulscher wrote.
“Although BNT162b2 might not [be] expected to have genotoxic or carcinogenic potential, the encoded spike protein that is produced does,” the study noted. “Therefore, these studies should have been performed. They were not.”
The study also noted that Pfizer-BioNTech performed toxicological studies using “Wister Han” rats — describing this as an “unusual” approach.
“The standard procedure for toxicology studies is to use two species (one rodent and one non-rodent species); in this case, the second species would have been Macaques primates,” the study said, adding that Wister Han rats do not have a similar physiological profile to humans.
“Rats in the wild are associated with at least 55 different pathogens that can pass onto humans; SARS-CoV-2 is not one of them,” the study noted.
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, said he found it “fascinating” that rats were used in toxicity studies for the vaccine. “The main function of the vaccine is to produce spike proteins and these spike proteins do not bind to a rat’s ACE2 receptor,” he said.
The study also highlighted failures by regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
“By February 2021, both Pfizer/BioNTech and the FDA were already aware that the product carried significant hazards. Vaccine-related adverse effects were being documented in VAERS” — the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — the study said.
Oldfield attributed legacy media’s downplaying of the vaccine’s side effects to social and institutional pressure. “Public health agencies could have adopted good scientific practice and issued a regulatory document that was scientifically sound. But they chose not to.”
Hulscher told The Defender, “There are 19,104 COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths in the United States reported to VAERS.” By comparison, “In the past, the Rotashield vaccine was removed from the market after only 15 cases of intussusception.” He blamed “widespread regulatory capture” for public health agencies’ inaction.
“The point to take from here is that the mechanisms for these effects are now known,” Oldfield said. “Therefore, they are not ‘potential’ adverse events — they’re real. Bear in mind we still don’t know the long-term effects of these mRNA vaccines.”
A key focus of the study was the distribution of spike proteins and LNPs throughout the body following vaccination. On Substack, Hulscher wrote: “Pfizer’s own biodistribution data showed lipid nanoparticles [and] modRNA were widely distributed throughout the body, including the liver, spleen, ovaries, and adrenal glands.”
Plothe said that after three years, we still “don’t know the quantity of the production of toxic spike proteins in our bodies via this gene therapy. But even more worrying is the fact that we don’t know how long our bodies produce them or, even worse if they will ever stop after the program of production is installed in our genes.”
Hulscher said the liability shield vaccine manufacturers have disincentivized them from reporting such findings. He said they “ignored these massive safety concerns, partly because they enjoy liability protection.”
‘There should be a moratorium on all mRNA injections’
The Cell Host & Microbe study focused on the neurological damage caused by the spike protein. In a summary of the study published on Substack, Hulscher said the authors “concluded that persistent Spike protein at the brain borders may contribute to lasting neurological sequelae of COVID-19.”
“Injection of spike protein alone was sufficient to induce neuroinflammation … anxiety-like behavior, and exacerbated outcomes in mouse models of stroke and traumatic brain injury,” that study found.
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., CHD’s chief scientific officer, told The Defender this finding “is especially notable” as neuroinflammatory processes are associated with many neurodevelopmental and neurological disorders in both children and adults.
“This begs the question as to why developing fetuses are exposed to spike protein prenatally through multiple maternal COVID-19 shots and also explains the presence of an autism-like phenotype in the offspring in rat studies,” Hooker said.
However, the study’s authors also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines reduced the presence of spike protein in the body. “Vaccination reduced but did not eliminate spike protein accumulation after infection in mice,” they wrote.
Other scientists questioned these claims. According to Hooker, “Given the fact that individuals get multiple shots and boosters that lead to spike protein production for as long as six months or longer, there is a much higher opportunity for spike protein accumulation in the brain than in these inadequate studies.”
Kevin McKernan, founder of Medicinal Genomics, is the first scientist who identified SV40 DNA contaminants in the mRNA vaccines. He told The Defender, “You have to always take the vaccination statements in these papers with skepticism.”
Noting that the mice used in this study received a dose of vaccine 160 times higher than the average human dose, McKernan said, “If the tables were reversed and this paper tried to claim the vaccine made this worse, they would not get away with such poorly supported leaps from their data.”
Hooker noted that humans also are asked to receive multiple booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccines, which leads to “a much higher opportunity for spike protein accumulation in the brain than in these inadequate studies.”
According to Hulscher, the original preprint of this study did not include any conclusions that vaccination reduces the presence of spike protein.
“This biased vaccination section was likely only added to pass the peer-review process,” Hulscher said. “It doesn’t make logical sense that the injection of mRNA encoding large amounts of neurotoxic spike protein offers any benefits.”
“Since all mRNA ‘vaccines’ hijack cells from various organ systems to produce toxic foreign antigens, they will likely have similarly disastrous safety profiles. Thus, there should be a moratorium on all mRNA injections,” Hulscher added.
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and part of the rotation of hosts for CHD.TV's "Good Morning CHD."
© 2016 - 2024 Children's Health Defense® • All Rights Reserved
The Defender HOMEPAGE
+++++++++++++++++++
SEE ALSO COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE:
BREAKING - New Study Urges Immediate Halt to COVID-19 mRNA Injections Over Alarming Levels of DNA Contamination: Researchers find DNA contamination in COVID-19 mRNA injections exceeding regulatory limits by over 300%, confirming findings from earlier studies; By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH; 12/3/24
