John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© December 13, 2022
There are a significant number of doctors and scientists
that are on the same page about government and Globalist Medical Tyranny. The
unfortunate reality emerging is that these same Anti-Medical Tyranny doctors/scientists
are beginning to squabble among themselves over fine-point differences as if
those differences are huge. It has gotten to the point that anti-Medical
Tyranny doctors/scientists are calling each other liars, insulting each other
and even litigating each other.
The appearance is agreement Medical Tyranny exists, BUT the
squabbling gives the tyrants in effect a divide-and-conquer victory making
anti-Medical Tyranny information appear insignificant. There are others yet the
biggest anti-Medical Tyranny proponents is the civil lawsuit between Dr. Robert
Malone and Dr. Peter Breggin (Malone’s position
& Breggin’s
position). In my humble observer’s opinion, both sides make good
points. Both sides have their allies and enemies. And chances are you support
the side who is your favorite anti-Medical Tyranny proponent.
On a personal level I find the squabbling extremely
saddening. I only care that the Medical Tyranny ends more than how got there or
which molecule exists and which does not exist. So, I pray these guys get over
their Ph.D./MD egos and work on ending the actual science liars: Big Pharma and
their acolytes in government agencies; WEF-Globalist-Fascist-Marxist Elitists
trying to transform society into an obedient Collective with Medical Tyranny as
the catalyst; and the Leftist Billionaires (devoted to WEF principles such as
Bill Gates, George Soros coming to mind).
The Medical Tyrants are fairly united in their agenda to
control the world. When the anti-Medical Tyranny proponents begin shooting each
other in the foot, the tyrants become secure in their power to control.
I preface my opinion on the idiocy of infighting because I
want to share a VERY
informative Dr. Malone Substack article on Fifth Generation Information
Warfare (FGIW). This is one of those cases in which knowledge is power at least
if the knowledge is used in a united front to end Medical Tyranny.
As a bonus I’m adding a Next News Network
video hosted by Gary Franchi on Bill Gates being involved in YET ANOTHER
Pandemic planning scenario similar to the Event 201 planning that
eerily preceded the release of the Wuhan-China Virus (err, I mean COVID19)
which Globalists allowed to be deadly EVEN THOUGH therapeutics were available to
save lives yet castigated by Big Pharma.
I’m following the NNN video with an American Thinker post
entitled, “Buckle
up: Bill Gates and the globalists quietly conducted a new exercise —
‘Catastrophic Contagion’”.
JRH 12/13/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I
need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy
supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):
My Store: https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
My Better Half’s Store: https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
*************************
Welcome to Fifth Gen (Information) Warfare
The battleground is consensus of the swarm and your
own mind
December 12, 2022
Congratulations. As we approach 2023, you are
now completing and have survived the third year of the largest, most globally
coordinated psychological warfare operation in the history of mankind. During
this period, on a daily basis, you have experienced the US Government and many
western nations deploying highly refined, military-grade fifth generation
warfare technologies against their own citizens. For those who have avoided the
jabs which are neither safe nor effective, you deserve a medal for your ability
to see through the fog of information warfare. Those, like me, who trusted the
FDA and took the initial jabs only to suffer the adverse effects of same,
perhaps a purple heart for being wounded in battle. For the millions of
battlefield dead, the excess
mortality documented by Ed Dowd and so many others, a moment
of silent mourning is in order.
Quoting from “Your
Guide to Fifth-Generation Warfare”
by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
March 27, 2022
"Fifth-generation warfare is a strange game. The
only winning move is not to play."
"The basic idea behind this term [fifth-generation
warfare] is that in the modern era, wars are not fought by armies or
guerrillas, but in the minds of common citizens."
Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is not waged
against standing armies of nation-states or guerrilla insurgents, but against
everyday citizens. This form of war is not fought in a battlefield somewhere,
but in the mind. Your mind. As previously discussed, Twitter
is a 5GW weapon, not a business.
If, after reading the recent coverage regarding the “Twitter
Files”, you have any remaining doubts that the US Government “Administrative
State” lead by the Uniparty is waging fifth generation warfare against American
citizens, then this October 07, 2022 article by Becker News titled “President
Biden Revokes Executive Branch Rules Against Spying on American Citizens”
should dispel those. As Will Chamberlain, Senior Counsel at the Internet
Accountability Project and the Article 3 Project, put it on Twitter:
“Joe Biden just rescinded executive branch rules that prevent spying on
American citizens.”
Biden
Speech - Condemning Conservatives
What is Fifth Generation Warfare (5GW)?
I am a student, not an expert on 5GW, but I certainly am
getting rapidly trained in the school of hard knocks. Consequently, in trying
to make sense out of this new form of warfare, I have had to rely on true
experts. With that in mind, please forgive the following extended quote from “Fourth-
and Fifth-Generation Warfare: Technology and Perceptions”, published in
2019 by Dr. Waseem Ahmad Qureshi. Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan, in the
San Diego International Law Journal (Volume 21). Dr. Qureshi’s highly
footnoted and referenced article can be downloaded for free
(PDF) here. For those seeking additional information and context, I
also recommend reading “The
Handbook of 5GW: A Fifth Generation of War?” by Daniel Abbott.
Returning to Dr. Qureshi and his seminal 2019 academic
paper:
Dr.
Waseem Ahmad Qureshi Paper Screen Capture
The composition of warfare is
changing. The traditional aspects of waging a war are evolving: conventional
techniques of warfare are in decline, and newer tactics and tools of warfare,
such as information warfare, asymmetric warfare, media propaganda warfare, and
hybrid warfare, are filling the gap, consequently blurring the lines between
combatant and noncombatant, and between wartime and peacetime. The basic
framework of modern warfare was elaborated by Carl von Clausewitz in his
magnus opus On War. He defined modern warfare between states as “a duel
on larger scale,” and explained its purpose as “a continuation of politics by
other means,” with core elements of “rationality of the state, probability in
military command, and rage of the population.”
William S. Lind distinguished
between four generations of warfare since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, each
generation representing a way of fighting war. Daniel H. Abbott continued
this by propounding fifth-generation warfare as a battle of perceptions.
First-generation warfare,
which was fought between 1648 and 1860, introduced the monopoly of a state to
wage war. Before that, tribes and businesses could also wage war.
First-generation warfare marked the culture of order, with identifiable rules
of ranks and military uniforms to counter the increasing disorderliness in the
battlefields. This generation of warfare was mainly dominated by mass manpower.
The second generation of
warfare was introduced by the French army and it ended with
World War I. This generation introduced artillery, airplanes, and heavy
gunfire, while preserving the culture of order established during the first
generation. Second- generation warfare soldiers were relieved of hand-to-hand
combat and obedience guided by rules took precedence over self-initiatives.
This generation of warfare was mainly dominated by firepower.
The third generation,
maneuver warfare, was a German product and it was used during World
War II. This generation of warfare introduced the tactical warfare of surprise,
applying the motto “bypassing and undermining” the enemy. In this generation,
initiative was preferred to obedience guided by self-discipline. This
generation of warfare was mainly dominated by maneuver tactics of warfare.
Fourth-generation warfare
(4GW)—which rose to prominence over the last five to six
decades—brought the most radical change since the Peace of Westphalia by
introducing non-state actors in warfare and by denying the state a
monopoly. …
Fourth-generation warfare is mainly dominated by the asymmetric tactic of using
non-state actors. This generation ended the state monopoly of the use of
force and included cultures, tribes, sects, and mercenaries into warfare,
going back to pre-Westphalian era warfare. In 4GW, there is
no distinction between wartime and peacetime, because non-state actors
use force both during war and in peacetime through asymmetric strategies, using
mainly unlawful force and blurring the lines for the lawful use of force by
taking refuge behind human shields and by blaming collateral damages on
the state. This practice also merges combatants with noncombatants and
vice-versa; asymmetric warfare strategies are this generation’s default mode,
and 4GW lasts a long time. Lind correctly believes that currently there exists
no military solution to 4GW; as Michael Howard found, modern warfare strategy
is not purely a military undertaking but instead consists of political, social,
economic, cultural, and psychological elements and actions.
Note that the United States has consistently lost 4GW
wars from Vietnam to the present, which have primarily been fought in Southeast
Asia and the Middle East. The catastrophically mismanaged Afghanistan
withdrawal is the latest example proving the point. From this we can conclude
that 4GW is an effective strategy when engaging in asymmetric battle with a
technically superior (from a 3GW perspective) Imperialist foe. Good to know.
Park that for future reference in the event that the Globalists succeed in
having their way with us.
Fifth-generation warfare
(5GW) is the battle of perceptions and information. 5GW is also
a cultural and moral war, which distorts the perception of the masses to
give a manipulated view of the world and politics. ….
Slog defines 5GW as the
secret deliberative manipulation of actors, networks, institutions, states or
any [0GW, 1GW] 2GW/3GW/4GW forces to achieve a goal or set of goals across a
combination of socioeconomic and political domains while attempting to avoid or
minimize the retaliatory offensive or defensive actions/reactions of 2GW, 3GW,
4GW powered actors, networks, institutions, and/ or states. (Purples
Slog, 5GW Working Definition, 0.91, in THE
HANDBOOK OF 5GW 213, 213 (Daniel H. Abbott ed., 2010))
5GW is the battle of perceptions
and information. In 5GW, violence is so discreetly dispersed that the victim is
not even aware that it is a victim of war and the victim is not aware that it
is losing the war. The secrecy of this warfare makes it the most dangerous
warfare generation of all time. This warfare hides in the background, and “the
most successful [fifth generation] wars are wars that are never identified.”
5GW is also a cultural and moral
war, which distorts the perception of the masses to give a manipulated view of
the world and politics. By contrast, 4GW has mainly used asymmetric means,
such as the use of non-state actors. Lind’s portrayal of 4GW in moral and
cultural territory is somewhat similar to Abbott’s analysis of 5GW, which
departs from the cultural rage of the population as depicted in 4GW, and which
considers the perception of the conflict’s context as a main focal point of
analysis. The 5GW of perception and context combines the “rage of the people”
and the “rationality of the state” to form an intended outcome of warfare,
rendering military command useless.
5GW exploits cultural icons and
religious sentiments to defeat an opponent. Any means of creating political
support of the masses is a valid tactic, similar to other military warfare
tactics, like the troop surge in Iraq. Abbott argues that an enraged mob,
professional soldiers, and other irregular means can constitute destructive
forces. According to him, information proliferation in warfare has
technologically designed practices of warfare that obviate the requirement of
violence and the direct physical involvement of the aggressors; instead, the
information through networks and surveillance manipulates and exploits the
public’s general perceptions. Sun Tzu defines this tactic of altering
the perspectives of the world as the “acme of skill [a victory without
fighting].” The effectiveness of 5GW depends on its disparity: it does
not require any unity in its efforts and instead, the more a warfare is
dispersed in its efforts, the more immune and effective it becomes.
Wars of perception are 5GW, with
information being the weapon, due to increased technology of cyberspace, media,
social media, the noticeability of these tactics of deception and propaganda
backed by identity construction and misperception, and the power of shaping the
will of the adversary.
Since the proliferation of
information decides the ultimate victory of future wars, centricity is less
effective than the absence of weak links. 5GW is the battle between the
absolute concentration of power (aggressor) on one end, and the absence of
power on the other, and this battle compels the enemy to achieve the desired
outcome without using violence. Information about the desired political
world perspective is entrenched through manipulating the culture at the
unconscious level, rendering it impossible for the conscious mind to even
detect it and heavily influencing the political division to obtain the desired
outcomes.
Adversaries are powerless to
defend themselves against this infiltration of perspectives, and if they
understand this change and infiltration, they will often mistake the
aggressor’s true political motivation with distorted perceptions and with the
manipulated information of diplomacy and propaganda. In effective 5GW, the
embedded influence of perspective is harmonized with violence. This warfare of
perspective makes the fifth generation “an influence, an idea, a thing
invulnerable, intangible, without front and back, drifting about like a gas.”
This is a kind of silent war, a “war where the war and political desires are
visible but the combatants and the strategic forms of power used in the war are
invisible, [not truly energetic] and lean towards . . . influence.” This
concept of [silent] war was developed by Kautilya, as explained by Boesche:
“[S]ilent war is a kind of
fighting that no other thinker I know of has discussed. Silent war is a kind of
warfare with another kingdom in which the king and his ministers—and
unknowingly, the people—all act publicly as if they were at peace with the
opposing kingdom, but all the while secret agents and spies are assassinating
important leaders in the other kingdom, creating divisions among key ministers
and classes, and spreading propaganda and disinformation. . . . . In silent
warfare, secrecy is paramount, and . . . the king can prevail only by
“maintaining secrecy when striking again and again.”
Previously, war aimed at
gaining greater visibility of violence and energy, but currently the desired
outcome is to influence rather than being visible, with the defeated target not
knowing the fact that it is being attacked, how it is being hit or even or
that that the enemy exists.
In this battle of the minds, a
cyberwar is taking place, turning ordinary people into insurgents against their
own governments through propaganda and misinformation. This tactic creates
leaderless resilience comprised of a phantom cell structure without any
headquarters or hierarchical orders; where people within the movement have the
same general outlook, the same philosophy, and where they react similarly and
target perceived tyrannical state governments.
Every independent person has the
responsibility of acquiring the skills and intelligence to be able to execute a
mission by himself, coordinated by an emergent network, connected
through [o]rgans of information distribution such as newspapers, leaflets,
computers, etc., which are widely available to all, keep each person informed
of events, allowing for a planned response that will take many variations. No
one need issue an order . . . . . Those idealist [sic] truly committed to the
cause of freedom will act when they feel when the time is ripe, or will take
their cue from others who precede them. According to Beam’s definition,
5GW manipulates the perception of reality of the adversary, stealing the
identity of the adversary and the identity of the host in the process, and
works on an identity-constructivist framework of international politics.
Resisting Fifth Generational Warfare.
Returning again to Dr. Qureshi.
Fighting 5GW can be
characterized as counterinsurgency. Counterinsurgency liquidates the
ideological and ethnic perceptions created by 4GW, breaking the social
relationship between non-state actors/insurgents and the general public. The
counterinsurgent must drive societal change, target the cultural values of
insurgents and the general population, fight on an intellectual level, and deny
insurgents an enemy to fight against, rendering it impossible for the public
and insurgents to identify the counterinsurgents’ intentions. These tactics
form a non-hostile relationship between counterinsurgents and the people; as a
result, it protects civilians’ well-being and survival. Counterinsurgency
creates a safe space, popular security and cooperative identities. However,
paradoxically this counterinsurgent involvement contributes to the dependence
of the population on counterinsurgents. Therefore, states must instead resist
this neocolonial Raj of imposed perspectives in shaping ideologies in the hopes
of resolving all political matters.
The ways of waging a war are
evolving, owing to a decline in the traditional way of waging wars and the
emerging globalization and advancement in technology and communication.
Therefore, wars through asymmetric means, information, and covert operations
are on the rise, with non-state actors being prominent on the battlefield. A
strategy to counter these new generations of warfare is to combine conventional
tactics with the new innovative techniques of DIMEFILCH (full integration of
Diplomatic, Information, Military, Economic, Financial, Intelligence, Law
enforcement, Cultural and Humanitarian capabilities), and to develop a tight
coordination among military, diplomatic, judicial, and economic institutions,
while also working with foreign counterparts and international institutions.
More importantly, we need to change our mindset to be able to counter and
understand the newly emerging threats and their asymmetric purposes. It is
imperative to know the enemy and to know ourselves, to understand why and how
the enemy works, and for what purposes.
Additionally, a loophole exists
in the prohibition on the use of force in the UN Charter: following Nicaragua,
aggression and use of force now include supplying arms and financial support to
insurgents, rebels and other non-state actors working against the state but to
be held accountable, it has to established that the non-state actors are under
the direct control of the state-aggressor, which in practice is hard to
do. That loophole is exploited by aggressive states when they employ hired guns
to do the dirty work of their political will and leave no fingerprints. Thus,
the aggressor cannot be held liable: they avoid direct engagement to circumvent
the requirements of the international laws of using force.
As I mentioned at the beginning of this essay, you are now
completing and have survived the third year of the largest, most globally
coordinated 5GW psychological warfare operation in the history of mankind.
During this period, on a daily basis, you have experienced the US Government,
and many western nations (in close cooperation with the Pharmaceutical
industry) deploying highly refined, military-grade 5GW technologies, strategies
and tactics against their own citizens.
As described by Dr. Qureshi, these methods and techniques
were developed to combat overseas adversaries, but have now been turned against
the citizens of western nation-states to advance globalist agendas which are
shared by the Imperial Administrative State and its Uniparty political allies.
What we have all experienced is the new innovative techniques of DIMEFILCH
being deployed against all of us to advance a broad range of pharmaceutical,
commercial, financial and political control objectives collectively referred to
as “The Great Reset”. So wake up and get with the program. Understand what is
being done to you, and who is doing it.
5GW is the fusion of military and “intelligence” operations,
strategy and tactics, and your mind, your thoughts, your emotions are the
battleground being fought over. Aligned with best 5GW practices, the objective
is to win the war to advance a new centralized, command economy-based world
order which you have not voted to endorse, one in which the very concept of
autonomous sovereign nation-states is considered obsolete, and to do so without
your even being aware of what is being done.
What is “Swarm Consensus”?
As previously discussed in the preceding essay “Physicals,
Virtuals, Machines and Overlords. Is the dark vision of a new caste system for
the fourth revolution inevitable?”, the old “class system” of
lower, middle, and upper classes is rapidly being extinguished, replaced with a
new worker caste system in which those who do physical labor and are grounded
by their daily contact with physical realities inhabit a separate reality from
those who live virtually - the laptop class of journalists, academics, coders
and information technology workers, and those who work in advertising and
finance. Above these worker castes are the machines, currently the
computational, artificial intelligence/machine learning/deep learning,
surveillance state devices and robotics infrastructure; soon to be the new
“transhuman” human-machine hybrids so often discussed by WEF leaders Klaus Schwab and Yuval Noah Harari.
And above human workers and machines reside the Overlords, the tiny fraction of
a fraction of the global population who are on track to fashion a world in
which “you will own nothing- and be happy” while they own everything. Larry
Fink, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk being high-profile examples of the
latter.
“Swarm Consensus” is a term recently popularized by the
brilliant writer and analyst Mary Harrington, who writes
for “UnHerd”. Swarm Consensus primarily operates at the level of the
Virtual caste, as the Physical caste is currently fragmented and disorganized,
and therefore unable to readily achieve its own consensus on the future
direction of the Nation and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” being so
actively advocated and “shaped” by the World Economic Forum and its thought
leaders. But the Virtuals have their social media tools and the backing of both
the Silicon Valley Overlords as well as corporate media. Which brings us back
to the 5GW weapon known as Twitter.
<An aside, what is going on with this new wave of
brilliant female analyst/Authors? Mary Harrington, Whitney
Webb, and my partner Dr. Jill Glasspool-Malone come to mind, but
there are many others. Why have these powerful female intellectual voices been
missing in the past?>
According to Mary Harrington, writing in her essay titled “Musk is
becoming a true Caesar. The Twitter Files are a weapon of the new
authoritarianism”, “swarmism is a kind of
post-democratic democracy: a mutant form of liberal proceduralism, characterised
by collective decision-making in which no one is ever individually
accountable.”
No-one is ever individually accountable. Which
means that our outdated legal system and compromised legislature will never be
able to provide any sort of justice or restitution for those who have been
damaged by the actions of the swarm. This also happens to be what is going on
within the US DHS and HHS, and why the bad actors responsible for the
COVIDcrisis in those administrative agencies will never be brought to justice.
Swarmism as a basis for decision making. Swarmism is analogous to
the ultimate Imperial Administrative State confidential oversight committee,
which by its very design can never be held accountable for actions taken. Which
comes back to the central characteristic of the Virtual caste - in their world,
reality and morality are subjective, context dependent, and opportunistic. The
ends justify the means, and for virtual true believers, you (and objective
reality) are whatever you “hope” or believe them to be. Hope can be readily
substituted for data in decision making, because reality is akin to a Salvador
Dali’s 1931 painting “Persistence of
Memory”.
Salvador
Dali’s 1931 painting 'Persistence of Memory'
Here is an extended cautionary quote from her article which
helps illuminate what Mary Harrington is writing about:
Is it okay to be authoritarian,
as long as it’s in the name of the right moral values? Some “post-liberal’
conservatives would say so. America might have been founded on the liberal
separation of church and state, the argument goes, but that’s running out of
road. Instead, to save the American polity and way of life, church and state
should once again draw together.
But if there’s one lesson we
should take from the ongoing spectacle surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop,
it’s not the avalanche of claims and counter-claims about censorship or bias,
or the sulphurous accusation of stolen elections. It’s that polite proposals
about a bit more Christianity in the public square are hopelessly behind the
times. All of politics is already post-liberal, and mainstream power has
already explicitly embraced a faith-based moral order.
That is: American Church and
American State have already ended their three-century separation. And
Laptopgate is most significant in what it reveals about the contest now on for
a suitable post-liberal political regime: a battle that pits the “human”
against something more like a “swarm”.
She goes on to develop her thesis by focusing on the tension
between Elon Musk (as a new Cesar) and the elitist Uniparty “swarmists”.
The Biden administration is fond
of talking about “democracy” versus “autocracy”, but it might be more accurate
to talk about swarmism and Caesarism. Swarmism is a kind of post-democratic democracy:
a mutant form of liberal proceduralism, characterised by collective
decision-making in which no one is ever individually accountable. Instead,
consequential decisions are as far as possible pushed out to supposedly neutral
procedures or even machines. When NGO officials whom you can’t vote out of your
political ecosystem talk about “our
democracy”, they’re talking about swarmism.
Caesarism, on the other hand,
looks substantially the same at lower levels. The main difference is that you
get named humans in key decision-making roles — complete with human partiality,
eccentricity, and occasional fallibility. Twitter was, until recently, a key
vector of elite swarmism. And to swarmists, such rule by a named individual,
rather than a collective and some committee-generated “guidelines”, is by
definition morally wrong. This core assumption oozes, for example, from
this report on
the takeover, with its empathetic depiction of the anonymous, collegiate
collective of sacked Trust and Safety workers sharply contrasted with the
autocratic, erratic individual Elon Musk.
Some defenders of Twitter
decision-making over the Hunter Biden case point to
the fact that the emails reveal no overt demands for censorship from the CIA or
any other political agency. But this is the point: swarmism doesn’t work like
that. Consensus-formation is mystified and de-personalised at every turn. The
Twitter Files are explosive because they afforded a peek under the purportedly
neutral swarmist carapace, revealing not just the named individuals involved in
steering it but also human fallibility and political affinities.
Guiding development and managing the consensus of Twitter’s
blue check “swarm” is one of many examples which illustrate the strategy,
tactics, and objectives of the 5GW which is being waged against citizens by the
Imperial Administrative State and their Uniparty politician allies.
But have no illusions about this: your mind, opinions,
and emotions are the battlefield being fought over. Your only options are to
either get educated about 5GW and work hard to ferret out the lies, opt out
(and consider opting into virtual communities), or just concede your (and your
children’s) autonomy and sovereignty to the Uniparty and their globalist
Overlords. Your choice, their future.
© 2022 Robert W Malone, MD
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Youtube VIDEO: ALERT:
BILL GATES PREPS FOR NEXT “CATASTROPHIC CONTAGION” WITH DEADLY VIRUS SIM
TARGETING YOUR KIDS
Posted by The Next News Network
Posted on Dec 12, 2022
Sub To The Channel: http://nnn.is/Sub-to-N3
Get On Our Email List: http://nnn.is/email-newsletter-next-news
Bill Gates' unsettling accuracy in predicting future
pandemics is cause for alarm. He not only anticipated the Covid-19 pandemic by
participating in "Event 201" -- an global health exercise -- but also
conducted a "monkeypox preparedness exercise" that forecasted its
emergence to the exact month.
[Blog Editor: In case censored by Youtube: https://www.bitchute.com/video/a_V9ObmjYdM/]
++++++++++++++++++++++
Buckle up: Bill Gates and the globalists quietly
conducted a new exercise — ‘Catastrophic Contagion’
Coronavirus
COVID19 Epidemic Mask - Image:
Free image,
Pixabay license, no attribution required.
December 12, 2022
You might vaguely remember, but shortly before the first
suspected case of Covid-19 showed up in China, global bureaucrats and academic
elites convened for a “global pandemic” exercise; it was known as Event 201.
The event was invite-only, and included representatives from the WEF, Johns
Hopkins, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It was largely funded by
the Open Philanthropy Project, which is closely aligned with the Clinton
Foundation. According to the official
website for this preparatory practice run:
Event 201 was a 3.5-hour
pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based
facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas
associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible,
pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were
players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world
policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political
will, financial investment, and
attention now and in the future.
Now, you’re not going to believe this, but the “scenario”:
…simulate[d]
an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to
people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person,
leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are
modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting
by people with mild symptoms.
Gee, now what a coincidence! I recall an origin story of bat
soup from Wuhan wet markets, a virus that looks like SARS, and “asymptomatic”
spread….
Now, the same players are back, and
recently hosted a new pandemic exercise, albeit it was all
very hush-hush. Oddly, I can’t find much about it online, except from Johns
Hopkins:
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the
Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
…
The exercise simulated a series
of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic
set in the near future. Participants grappled with how to respond to an
epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a
pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately
affecting children and young people.
Participants were challenged to
make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of
uncertainty….
First of all, this report illustrates one of the biggest
obstacles to a free world, a message which is overtly relevant to America:
bureaucrats should not be practicing making policy decisions,
that responsibility lies in the hands of legislators, all of
whom are bound to confines laid forth in the Constitution and respective state
constitutions.
Yet, that’s exactly why these sorts of people are pushing
for a global “pandemic
treaty” to subjugate sovereign nations to the will of a global
government.
Secondly, it’s worth noting exactly who the players are for
“Catastrophic Contagion”: we have ambassadors from the WHO (the organization
leading the charge for the “pandemic treaty”), we have Bill Gates himself, and
two of the Event 201 figures (Tom Inglesby and Anita Cicero).
Lastly, we must deduce that this is a harbinger, just like
Event 201 was. Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset has not been fully realized, and
whether we like it or not, that’s the end goal.
The next “pandemic” is coming, and times like
these require a reflection on timeless and grounding truths, like Ben
Franklin’s famous 1755 adage: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to
purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
© American Thinker 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment