Pertaining to the JFK assignation: due to decades of giving the
murder investigation a classified status, Conspiracy Theories abounded from the
nutty to the plausible as to who pulled the strings in the successful plot.
Many, myself included, question that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone let alone a
singular gun shooter.
Could the same air of secrecy be covering the Vegas Massacre
from the Mandalay Bay Hotel?
Again, the lack of information about the Vegas Massacre has
spawned a slew of Conspiracy Theories from the downright idiotic-ridiculous to
the plausible. One of the most idiotic was the shooting was a false flag hoax
and nobody died. HELLO! Public records disprove anything even close to a hoax.
AND YET – Still no credible motive has been made public by
the investigators to one of the worst massacres credited to a
single person on American soil.
James Ledbetter writing at The News
Guru, has come up with some plausible speculation that only time
and some public revelations will tell.
JRH 11/29/17
******************
Official story of Las Vegas shooting unravels; physical
impossibility of lone gunman senior citizen makes narrative ludicrous
November 27, 2017
It’s all hogwash. The
“official” narrative of how things went down in the Las Vegas massacre is so
full of holes that it begs the question of just how deep the truth about this
attack really goes.
What we know for sure is
that, yes, 59 people were killed (so far) and hundreds were wounded. This
wasn’t a “hoax” shooting — people actually were shot, wounded and killed (and
our prayers go out to all their families for this horrific tragedy).
Yet the official narrative
that claims Stephen Paddock — a retired, 64-year-old accountant with absolutely
no firearms training, no gun experience and no physical stamina — was somehow
able to expertly wield a highly complex (and physically demanding) weapon
system for 10 sustained minutes is total nonsense.
Clarification added
10/4/2017: My contention in this story is that Stephen Paddock couldn’t have
pulled this off all by himself. That does not mean he wasn’t involved in the
shooting. He could have fired weapons himself, alongside others who were also
firing weapons from either his hotel room or from different locations.
This story does not
exclude his involvement in the shooting. Some people are misinterpreting this
story as claiming that Paddock never fired a shot. That isn’t at all what this
story states.
Even highly trained Navy
Seals would have a difficult time running a full auto weapon for 10 minutes
straight. Such weapon systems are
brutal on the operator. They require tremendous strength, stamina and expert
troubleshooting to keep running. Full-auto weapons overheat and jam.
They demand incredible
strength to keep aimed on target. They require expert reloading and weapons
clearing in the case of jams, and the hotel room would have been so full of
smoke and powder residue that it would be almost impossible to keep breathing
from that enclosed space.
Far from what the
firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not systems that any Joe off the
street can just pick up and use to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running
these systems requires extensive training, experience and stamina. It is
physically impossible for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system
in the sustained, effective manner that we witnessed, especially when shooting
from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon
system.
Far from being a Navy Seal,
Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant senior citizen with a gambling problem
and a flabby physique.
The only way he could have
carried out this shooting is if he were transformed into a human superweapon
through a magic wand. I’m calling this “Mission IMPOSSIBLE” because of the
physical impossibility of a retired, untrained senior citizen pulling this off.
Here are 11 reasons why the
official narrative is complete B.S.
#1: As many as 10 rifles
were found in his hotel room… but only one shooter?
The NY Daily News is now
reporting that Stephen Paddock “brought at least 10 weapons into a Las Vegas
hotel room.”
Why would a single shooter
need 10 rifles? Managing just one full auto weapon system is so difficult that
it’s probably beyond the physical capabilities of a 64-year-old retired
accountant, which is what Paddock was.
The fact that 10 rifles were
found in his hotel room says three very important things:
1)
The rifles were staged
for more than one shooter.
2)
The operation was extremely
well funded.
3)
The attack took a
tremendous amount of time to set up, because you don’t just walk 10 rifles up
to your hotel room in a single trip.
#2: As with many orchestrated shootings, the scapegoat
was murdered before he could talk
According to numerous media reports, Paddock was found dead
in his hotel room, shot to death. The official narrative claims that he shot
himself before the police breached the room, but that is an assumption,
not an established fact. There is no evidence whatsoever that Paddock shot
himself. It is simply assumed that he did so. I would ask to see the ballistics
evidence of the shot that killed him.
Isn’t it all convenient? There’s no one left to question,
and they don’t even have to drug the guy into oblivion like they did the Aurora, Colorado shooter named James Holmes.
Eliminating the scapegoat is the oldest trick in the book, as we were all
reminded with the shooting of JFK.
#3: Why are there no muzzle flashes visible from the
32nd-floor Mandalay Bay windows in any of the videos that captured the
shooting?
If you look at the shooting videos that have been posted
online, none of them show any muzzle flashes from the room on the 32nd floor
that we’ve been told is the source of the shooting. How can that be? The
following video captures the sound of the automatic weapons fire — and even
appears to capture at least TWO weapons firing simultaneously — yet shows no
muzzle flashes from the 32nd floor windows of the Mandalay Bay hotel.
In fact, the video below shows what might be muzzle flashes
from a completely different location closer to the 5th floor. This same video
also appears to show someone resembling Stephen Paddock attending an anti-Trump
rally, wearing a so-called “pu##y hat” that was very popular among
anti-Trumpsters. One working theory is that Paddock is an anti-Trump Leftist
who specifically chose a Country Western event in order to murder as many
conservatives as possible.
#4 Why does the gunfire in multiple online videos clearly
sound like automatic weapons fire from MULTIPLE weapons?
I challenge anyone to listen to the gunfire in these online
videos and conclude it’s only from a single weapon. The very idea is totally
absurd. You can clearly hear at least two automatic weapons systems firing over
each other.
Listen to the automatic weapons fire at about the 2:00 mark
in the video below. It’s clearly coming from multiple weapons:
[Posted by IINDIGO
Published on Oct 2, 2017
Las Vegas shooting raw footage.
Apparently, the shooter was shooting from The Mandalay Bay Resort. RIP]
#5: ISIS has openly claimed responsibility for the
attack, stating that Paddock “converted to Islam” months earlier
As reported on Shootings.news,
ISIS has already claimed responsibility for the Las Vegas shooting:
Islamic State has claimed
responsibility for a shooting that killed at least 50 people and wounded over
400 in Las Vegas early on Monday, and said the attacker had converted to Islam
a few months ago.
ISIS has a long track record of only claiming responsibility
for events they inspired or planned. It would not be in the interests of ISIS
to falsely claim credit for an attack they did not help carry out, as that
would discredit their own supporters and funding sources.
#6: Stephen Paddock had no familiarity with automatic
weapons and no military training; was not a “gun guy”
From Yahoo News:
Saying his family was in shock,
Paddock’s brother told US media he could not understand what motivated his
elder brother.
“Where the hell did he get
automatic weapons? He has no military background or anything like that,” Eric
Paddock told CBS News.
“He’s a guy who lived in a house
in Mesquite, drove down and gambled in Las Vegas. He did stuff. Eat burritos.”
And from NY Daily News:
Eric said his brother was
typically no fan of such weaponry. “Not an avid gun guy at all,” Eric Paddock
told CBS News outside his home in Waterford Lakes, Fla.
#7: How does a 64-year-old accountant with no military
training possess the strength and stamina to fire a fully automatic weapon for
nearly 10 minutes?
People who aren’t familiar with firearms have no idea how
difficult it is to conduct sustained fire with an automatic weapon. It requires
tremendous strength, endurance and training — something that Stephen Paddock
had none of. Military special forces operatives train for years to be able to
manage such weapons and handle all the problems they pose (barrel overheating,
ammo jams, double feeds, recoil management, etc.). The idea that some senior
citizen accountant can just pick up a machine gun and lay down thousands of
rounds of effective fire in a sustained, 10-minute assault even though he had
no experience with such weapons is completely ludicrous.
It actually looks like someone else staged all the guns in
the room, perhaps with Paddock’s willingness, then shot and killed Paddock to
make him the scapegoat.
Numerous media reports confirm that Paddock had no
familiarity with guns and certainly didn’t have any experience with automatic
weapons. Via the UK Daily Mail:
Despite being found amid an
arsenal of weapons, Eric said that his brother had never been ‘an avid gun guy
at all’, adding that he was at a loss as to where Stephen got his arsenal of
automatic weapons from.
#8: Stephen Paddock was gambling away huge amounts of
cash… where did
he get all that money?
According to NBC News, Paddock was engaged
in high-stakes gambling to the tune of as much as $30,000 per day:
On several occasions, Stephen
Paddock gambled more than $10,000 per day — and in some cases more than than
$20,000 and $30,000 a day — at Las Vegas casinos, according to an NBC News
source who read the suspect’s Multiple Currency Transaction Reports (CTR) and a
casino gaming executive.
Was he paid to be part of an operation that would then be blamed
on him by making him the scapegoat? Some media reports state that Paddock was a
wealthy real estate investor. If that’s true, why would he blow all that wealth
on gambling?
#9: Stephen Paddock has no criminal history, no record
and no apparent beef with anybody
Further supporting the notion that Stephen Paddock was a
scapegoat for all this,
Via NY Daily News:
…Paddock
had no federal, state or local history with law enforcement before his Sunday
night rampage that left
58 dead and more than 500 injured. “We had no knowledge of this individual,” said Clark
County Sheriff Joe Lombardo. “We checked all the databases…”
From the UK Daily Mail, we learn that
Paddock had no affiliation with any particular activist group, political group
or religious group as far as anyone knows:
“…He added that his brother had ‘no political affiliation,
no religious affiliation, as far as we know.”
#10: The attack required meticulous planning, funding and
training… it
wasn’t some lone
senior citizen who just “snapped”
What’s clear from this attack is that it was planned, funded
and coordinated. This was not some spontaneous “lone wolf” scenario; it
involved multiple weapons being fired simultaneously, long-term planning,
staging and financial logistics.
The official narrative that claims this retired accountant
just “snapped” and somehow picked up an automatic rifle and expertly laid down
highly effective fields of automatic weapons fire for 10 minutes without pause
is so insanely stupid as to be laughable.
Only a highly-trained weapons expert with tremendous
physical strength, stamina and training could have pulled this off. And that’s
clearly not Stephen Paddock.
#11: How was the FBI able to almost immediately declare
Paddock had no ties to ISIS — barely 12 hours after the shooting — when the
same agency has spent over a year investigating President Trump with zero
evidence linking him to Russia, all while refusing to declare Trump has no ties
to Russia?
Finally, don’t you find it amazing how the FBI was able to
clear any ISIS connection in less than 12 hours after the shooting? This is the
same FBI, remember, that has spent over a year desperately trying to find a
Russia conspiracy link to President Trump, yet has been unable to do with any
legitimate evidence whatsoever. Yet more than year into their investigation,
they refuse to clear President Trump of Russia collusion.
Isn’t that interesting? Somehow, the FBI is so amazingly
effective and efficient that they can conclude a massive investigation of
Stephen Paddock in a mere 12 hours, yet they never quite seem to complete their
investigation of President Trump.
Keep asking questions, everyone. And stay informed on all
this at Shootings.news.
__________________
We need to talk. Facebook has targeted our site, preventing over half of our stories from reaching our readers. We believe this is wrong and, honestly, we need your help to continue producing the quality news and opinion we produce every day. You can help make that possible:
§ Donate to help us fund a journalist to fight the corruption in the
mainstream media: https://paypal.me/thenewsguru
About News Guru
Founded in 2016 by James Ledbetter, a 10-year veteran journalist.
The News Guru is one of America’s largest and fastest-growing news
publications. >>> SEE OUR WIKI PAGE
No comments:
Post a Comment