Intro to Sutliff ‘The Deceitful Misinformation that
Created a TRO’
By Paul Sutliff
Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
Posted 4/4/17
Does anyone notice that activist Judges and Dem Party House
and Senate members cry that President Trump’s travel ban Executive Orders are
unconstitutional BUT don’t actually cite where in the Constitution they base
that accusation?
They CAN NOT because NO such citation will be found. When
the Left screams unconstitutional it typically is based on Leftist ideology and
a false premise that Leftist values are American values. For that matter, there
is not one iota of Left Wing values that can be supported in the Original
Intent of the Founding Fathers’ eventual ratified document called the U.S.
Constitution or the first 10 Amendments labeled the Bill of Rights!
I have little doubt a Lefty will fabricate some kind of Living Constitution as if it was in the U.S. Constitution;
however, note that such a citation will have little to do with the Constitution
and more to do with the Dem view that current environment and Activist Judge case
law is the Constitution.
With this Living Constitution baloney in mind, Hawaiian US
District Judge Derrick Watson amended his mid-March original Temporary
Restraining Order (TRO) against the latest
Trump Executive Order (EO) to fit the Hawaiian Attorney General’s idiotic
Living Constitution objections to extend the judicial order longer than the
original:
HONOLULU — A federal judge in
Hawaii decided Wednesday to extend his order blocking President Donald Trump's
travel ban.
US District Judge Derrick Watson
issued the longer-lasting hold on the ban just hours after hearing arguments.
Hawaii says the policy
discriminates against Muslims and hurts the state's tourist-dependent economy.
The implied message in the revised ban is like a "neon sign flashing
'Muslim ban, Muslim ban'" that the government didn't bother to turn off,
state Attorney General Douglas Chin told the judge.
Extending the temporary order until
the state's lawsuit was resolved would …
READ THE REST (Hawaii judge
extends temporary restraining order against Trump's revised travel ban; By Jennifer
Sinco Kelleher, Associated Press; Business
Insider; 3/29/17 11:14 PM)
Paul Sutliff believes the Hawaiian AG fed Judge Watson a
pack of lies. That is significant because this Judge based his ruling on AG
Chin’s information. Below is Paul’s analysis.
JRH 4/4/17
**************
The Deceitful Misinformation that Created a TRO
By Paul Sutliff
April 3, 2017 5:24 PM
When evidence exists to prove
a state attorney general purposefully misinformed a federal judge whether IN
COURT or through paperwork as to what evidence exists to support a stand
against the President of the United States what is this called? Is it perjury?
Hawaii AG Doug Chin was not
under oath, but there is an expectation of professionalism and truthfulness
when presenting before a judge whether through passing of papers OR standing
and presenting a case! So why did he misinform Judge Derrick Watson about
the statistics related to the University of Hawai’i.
AG Chin claimed that if
Trump’s order restricting travel of those from 6 countries were to be enforced,
the University of Hawai’i would suffer financially.
… that any prospective
recruits who are without visas as of March 16, 2017 will not be able to travel
to Hawaii to attend the University. As a result, the University will not be
able to collect the tuition that those students would have paid. (http://www.hid.uscourts.gov/docs/orders/DKW_order.pdf)
Judge Watson’s TRO cited AG
Douglass Chin's additional claim that if the ban goes into effect it will
likely cause the closing of the Persian Literature, Language and Culture Program.
So what are the actual
statistics? I filed a FOIA request with the University of Hawai’i to find out.
According to the University
of Hawai’i the entire University system has 13,352 students. Of those 13,352
students only, 43% of the student body as a whole were Iranian. One student
came from Libya. One from Somalia and one from Yemen. In all 61 students at the
University of Hawai’i would be effected through President Trump’s Executive
Order. IF THEY WERE NOT ALREADY HERE!
|
Banned Countries by Trump
EO
|
Total # of Students in UH
System
|
Percentage of Student Body
|
|
Iran
|
58
|
0.43%
|
|
Libya
|
1
|
0.01
|
|
Somalia
|
1
|
0.01
|
|
Sudan
|
0
|
0.00
|
|
Syria
|
0
|
0
|
|
Yemen
|
1
|
.01
|
|
TOTAL
|
61
|
.46
|
Attorney General Douglass
Chin made a claim that a drop in these students’ ability to attend classes
would likely close the Persian Language, Linguistics and Culture Program
courses. Only 52 students in total are enrolled in these courses taught
by two professors. If AG Chin had a chance to find a negative effect against
the University of Hawaii this was it. In all 4 students would be effected.
Those four are from Iran, bringing the percentage of students effected of those
that attend to 8%.
This brings us to asking
simple and important questions. How could Hawaii State Attorney General not
have access to this information? It took me one week to obtain it and I live in
New York. This brings us back to, is it allowable for an attorney to
purposefully withhold information for the purpose of misinforming a judge.
Attorneys Joel Cohen and
Danielle Alfonso Walsman wrote about just this type of thing in the New York
Law Journal on June 1, 2009 in an article entitled Asking for Trouble: When Lawyers Lie to Judges.
One
of the first and most obvious things we learn as lawyers, and, indeed, the
disciplinary rules make clear, is that lawyers must follow the same
instructions given to clients in preparation for testimony: You cannot ever lie
in court! And if a false representation is made to the court, even
unintentionally, a lawyer who later realizes his error is affirmatively
required to take reasonable measures to remedy the statement.
I do not know if Attorney
General Douglass Chin considers his filing for a TRO against President Trump’s
executive order a place he should be allowed to create misinformation to prove
his point, but in either case these statistics prove that the TRO is at least
partially established on false and misleading information. If the Judge had not
bothered to pre-write his decision, he could have easily verified the
information I am sharing and in so doing exposed AG Chin as not being wholly
truthful in court.
The sad truth then is that
this is likely evidence of collusion between the Hawaii AG and the Judge
Derrick Watson. If Judge Derrick Watson had not come to the bench
with a pre-judgment, he likely would have checked the statistical claims of the
AG.
_____________
Edited by John R. Houk
About Paul Sutliff
I am writer and a teacher. Here
is a link to my latest book portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad!
No comments:
Post a Comment