John R. Houk
© April 20, 2017
Back in March I was extremely upset that Fox News had
suspended (two posts: HERE & HERE) Judge Andrew
Napolitano for breaking the news that British Intel
organization Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)
was spying on President Donald Trump during his campaign run and during the
Obama lame duck period prior to the Trump inauguration on January 20, 2017.
There was no surprise that Leftist MSM called the Judge’s
report fake news, but many Conservative news outlets also threw the Judge under
the bus just like Fox News. Fox News anchor totally discredited
Andrew Napolitano the same day that the Judge was on Fox and Friends.
Very disconcerting to me was the way typically Conservative RedState
reported on Napolitano’s GCHQ exposé:
…
Judge Andrew Napolitano is
back on Fox News after reports that he was suspended temporarily because he
openly promoted an internet hoax about the British intelligence community
surveilling Donald Trump’s team, at the behest of former President Obama.
His poorly sourced story was used
by the president as “proof,” but otherwise discounted by others at Fox, such as
Shepard Smith, who said Fox News had seen nothing to back up Napolitano’s
claims. (Back On The Air With Fox News, Judge
Napolitano Stands By His Claims Of British Spying; By Susan
Wright; RedState;
3/29/17 6:30 pm)
Susan Wright uses words like “internet hoax” and “discounted
by others at Fox” which in my opinion unjustly impugns Andrew Napolitano’s
reputation.
I found a couple of articles that amplify the Andrew
Napolitano GCHQ exposé,
yet lends a huge amount credence to the Judge’s reporting. The articles are
both by the Daily Wire. The articles refer to Obama’s Administration gathering
intel on Trump:
1. By gathering Intel on Trump not
only from the UK, but also several other American ally foreign Intelligence
services. HELLO JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO!
2. The other Daily Wire story is
about then CIA Director John Brennan actively working with foreign Intelligence
services to “Falsify Trump-Russia Connections”.
How does this not incriminate Barack Hussein Obama, American
Intelligence service officials and probably numerable top Executive Branch officials
in felonious crimes that must be tried in Court before a jury?
YES, THAT INCLUDES FORMER PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!
It is bad enough that candidate
and now President Donald Trump had to run the gauntlet of the Obama
administration plotting against him. It is a whole new ball game when you find
out that most of the world’s intelligence agencies were feeding data to the
Obama Camp. If this is true, then there is no way that President Trump or his
team can ever trust any of these perpetrators.
JRH 4/20/17
****************
BOMBSHELL Report: Entire Western
World Helped Obama WIRETAP Trump
By JOHN NOLTE
APRIL 17, 2017
If
you are wondering why our national media has pretty much dropped the whole
Trump-Is-A-Russian-Manchurian-Candidate thing, it is because the naked truth
about the Obama administration's chilling spying -- something the media has covered up for months --
is finally coming to light. Last week, both The Washington Post and The
New York Times quietly reported that the Obama administration had
"wiretapped" (their word,
not mine) a Trump staffer.
The Trump-hating Guardian then dropped another bombshell, the news
that pretty much every Western intelligence agency in the world was aiding and
abetting the Obama administration's unbelievable and unprecedented (Nixon only wanted to
do this) abuse of power against a political opponent:
Over the next six months, until
summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on
contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.
The European countries that
passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia
and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also
includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source
said.
Another source suggested the
Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security
or DGSE, were contributors.
Q: So what exactly is this "sigint"?
Signals intelligence (SIGINT) is
intelligence-gathering by interception of signals, whether communications
between people (communications intelligence—abbreviated to COMINT) or from
electronic signals not directly used in communication (electronic
intelligence—abbreviated to ELINT). Signals intelligence is a subset of
intelligence collection management.
This next bit from the Guardian report is
important because it appears to vindicate Fox News commentator Judge
Napolitano, who was widely-ridiculed in the political media, and then suspended by Fox News, for
reporting something very close to this back in
March:
Britain’s spy agencies played a
crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between
members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives,
the Guardian has been told.
GCHQ first became aware in late
2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known
or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This
intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information,
they added.
No one better summed up what was going on here better than PowerLine's John Hinderaker:
The blindingly obvious point
that the Guardian tries to obscure is that the combined assets of all of these
agencies failed to find any evidence of collaboration between the Trump
campaign and Russia. We know this, because the Democrats have pulled out all
the stops. Both before the election, and especially after the election, they
have leaked furiously to try to discredit President Trump. If there were any
evidence of collusion between Trump (or even obscure, minor “advisers” like
Carter Page) and Russia, there would have been nothing else in the Washington
Post or the New York Times for the past five months. But they have nothing.
In other words, the whole world was spying on Trump, not
just the Obama administration, and even with all of these resources the
Democrats and their media got exactly squat. There is no evidence of any
wrongdoing between Team Trump and Russia. There is, however, a growing pile of
evidence that Team Barry needs to be investigated by Congress and the Justice
Department.
Hinderaker's second point is that everyone in the world was
so sure Hillary Clinton was going to beat Trump that all of these countries
believed it was safe to "curry favor with the new administration" by
spying on her opponent, by offering her intelligence-oppo during the campaign
that was then leaked to a MSM that was 100% complicit in this illegal behavior
-- because leaking intelligence is a felony.
If this is not scary enough, try to imagine what Hillary's
administration and the MSM would be doing to Donald Trump right now if he did
not have the power of the presidency to defend himself. As it is, the media
have been lying, smearing, and slandering him
without any evidence.
The only weapon Trump has had to fight back with is his
access to truth about Obama's spying, access he would not have had had he not
won the presidency.
We have already seen the
terrifying lengths Hillary and Obama will go to as a means to
cover up their lies, we have already seen the violence our media (especially CNN) is willing to gin up in order to protect a
Narrative. There is no doubt in my mind that with the help of their media
pals, had Hillary won the presidency, Trump would right now be in federal
prison for a crime he did not commit.
+++
Report: Former CIA Director
Colluded With Foreign Spies to Falsify Trump-Russia Connections
By JOSEPH CURL
APRIL 20, 2017
There
were dueling headlines this week, one from a liberal British newspaper, the
other from a conservative U.S. magazine.
“British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with
Russia," wrote The Guardian. Well, bother,
that'll put the prezzy in a bit of a spot.
But wait, there was this other headline -- same story, just
a different headline, from The American Spectator:
"Confirmed: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Defeat
Trump."
Well dang, now we don't know what to think.
The Guardian painted the "facts" in
dull hues:
The Guardian has been told the
FBI and the CIA were slow to appreciate the extensive nature of
contacts between Trump’s team and Moscow ahead of the US election. This was in
part due to US law that prohibits US agencies from examining the private
communications of American citizens without warrants. “They are trained not to
do this,” the source stressed.
“It looks like the [US] agencies
were asleep,” the source added. “They [the European agencies] were saying:
‘There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we
believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.’
Thank God for British intelligence, or we surely would've
missed this massive Trump-Russia collusion.
But The Spectator shined the spotlight into the dark
crevasses of the story:
Seeking to retain his position
as CIA director under Hillary, [John] Brennan teamed up with British spies and
Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy. He used their phony intelligence
as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to
probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan
Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people.
John Brennan’s CIA operated like
a branch office of the Hillary campaign, leaking out mentions of this bogus
investigation to the press in the hopes of inflicting maximum political damage
on Trump. An official in the intelligence community tells TAS that
Brennan’s retinue of political radicals didn’t even bother to hide their
activism, decorating offices with “Hillary for president cups” and other
campaign paraphernalia.
Huh. What a very different story.
What's important from the U.S. side, of course, is what our
own CIA director did.
Says The Spectator: "The Guardian says
that British spy head Robert Hannigan 'passed material in summer 2016 to
the CIA chief, John Brennan.' To ensure that these flaky tips leaked out,
Brennan disseminated them on Capitol Hill. In August and September of 2016, he
gave briefings to the'“Gang of Eight' about them, which then turned up on
the front page of the New York Times."
Funny, it was all right there in The Guardian report --
Brennan was the center of the storm. "The matter was deemed so sensitive
it was handled at 'director level.' After an initially slow start, Brennan used
GCHQ information and intelligence from other partners to launch a major
inter-agency investigation."
But The Guardian sought to play up the roles of British and
European agencies.
Over the next six months,
until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on
contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.
The European countries that
passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia
and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also
includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source
said.
But The Spectator cuts to the point far more
succinctly:
Were the media not so completely
in the tank for Obama and Hillary, all of this political mischief would make
for a compelling 2016 version of All the President’s Men. Instead, the public
gets a steady stream of Orwellian propaganda about the sudden propriety of
political espionage. The headline writers at Pravda couldn’t improve on this
week’s official lie, tweeted out by the Maggie Habermans: “Susan Rice Did
Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dem and Republican House Aides.”
_______________
How Long will U.S. Law
Ignore Obama Admin. Corruption?
John R. Houk
© April 20, 2017
_____________
BOMBSHELL Report: Entire
Western World Helped Obama WIRETAP Trump
AND
Report: Former CIA
Director Colluded With Foreign Spies to Falsify Trump-Russia Connections
No comments:
Post a Comment