Looking at ‘FULL DECLASSIFICATION of JFK, RFK and MLK assassination files’

 

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© January 26, 2025

 

President Donald Trump has signed an Executive Order (EO) to begin the process of fully declassifying the assassination files being kept hidden from public knowledge for decades.

 

So much speculation (some good – some on the ledge of incredulity) over the decades has been spun. The very essence of hiding the information implies GOVERNMENT COVERUP. What will WE THE PEOPLE finally be privy to in revelation?

 

I’m sharing an Alex Jones video I uploaded to my Rumble Channel followed by a NewsTarget story on the President Trump EO.

 

JRH 1/26/25

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee & Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com

>>DRINK COFFEE-MANAGE WEIGHT or MAKE SOME EXTRA CASH<<

*************************

Rumble VIDEO: President Trump EO Releases JFK, RFK & MLK Assassination Files

 

Posted by SlantRight

Published January 26, 2025

 

This clip is from Telegram Alex Jones (https://t.me/AlexJonesOfficiaI) posted on 1/24/25 (https://t.me/AlexJonesOfficiaI/355).

 

Alex Jones Description:

 

“BREAKING: Trump Has Signed An Executive Order To Declassify The JFK, RFK, and MLK Jr. Files And Requested The Pen He Used Be Given To RFK Jr.”

 

+++++++++++++++++++

Trump orders FULL DECLASSIFICATION of JFK, RFK and MLK assassination files in historic move for transparency

Trump-RFK-JFK-MLK (NewsTarget Photo)

 

By Willow Tohi

January 24, 2025

NEWSTARGET

 

  President Trump signed an executive order on January 23, 2025, directing the declassification of all federal records related to the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK, aiming to bring transparency to these controversial events.

 

  The move is part of a long-standing effort to reveal the truth, following partial releases in previous administrations, but now extends beyond the JFK assassination to include RFK and MLK.

 

  Trump's order mandates a 15-day plan for full disclosure of JFK-related records and a 45-day plan for RFK and MLK documents, acknowledging the complexity and scattered nature of the records.

 

  The declassification process aims to address conspiracy theories and lingering questions surrounding the assassinations, with experts divided on potential revelations from the newly released documents.

 

  The executive order is seen as a significant step toward restoring trust in government institutions and uncovering the truth, with implications for the families of the victims and the broader American public.

 

In a bold and unprecedented move, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday, January 23, 2025, directing the declassification of all federal records related to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy and civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The announcement, made in the Oval Office, marks a significant step toward fulfilling a long-standing promise to bring transparency to some of the most controversial and tragic events in American history.

 

“Everything will be revealed,” Trump declared as he signed the order, flanked by aides and advisors. “Their families and the American people deserve transparency and truth.” The president’s decision has reignited public interest in the decades-old mysteries surrounding these assassinations, which have fueled countless conspiracy theories and debates.

 

A long-awaited promise fulfilled

 

Trump’s move is not his first attempt to declassify files related to the JFK assassination. During his first term in 2017, he released 2,800 documents but left some redacted, citing national security concerns raised by the CIA and FBI. In 2018, he authorized the disclosure of an additional 19,000 documents, and in 2022, President Joe Biden released another batch. However, many records remained partially or fully redacted, leaving unanswered questions about what truly happened.

 

The 1992 John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act mandated the release of all JFK-related documents by 2017 unless the president authorized their continued withholding. Trump’s latest order goes beyond this law, extending to the assassinations of RFK and MLK, which were not covered by the 1992 legislation. “Although no Act of Congress directs the release of information pertaining to the assassinations of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I have determined that the release of all records in the Federal Government's possession pertaining to each of those assassinations is also in the public interest,” the order states.

 

The road to transparency

 

The declassification process will not be immediate. The executive order gives the director of national intelligence and the attorney general 15 days to present a plan for the “full and complete” release of JFK-related records and 45 days for RFK and MLK documents. This timeline reflects the complexity of the task, as many records are scattered across multiple agencies, including the CIA, FBI and National Archives.

 

Jefferson Morley, editor of the JFK Facts newsletter and a former Washington Post reporter, noted that more than 3,600 documents related to JFK’s assassination remain redacted. “Officials must determine whether records outside the National Archives collection — including those held by the Kennedy family and agencies such as the CIA and FBI — fall under Trump’s executive order,” Morley said. “Then, they will need to locate and review them.”

 

The process is further complicated by the fact that records related to RFK and MLK are not as consolidated as those for JFK. This means additional time and resources will be required to ensure their full disclosure.

 

Why this matters: A nation’s quest for truth

 

The assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK were defining moments in American history, each leaving an indelible mark on the nation’s psyche. JFK’s death in Dallas on November 22, 1963, shattered the optimism of the early 1960s and sparked decades of speculation about whether Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone or as part of a larger conspiracy. RFK’s assassination on June 5, 1968, just moments after he won the California Democratic presidential primary, further deepened the nation’s sense of loss and division. MLK’s murder on April 4, 1968, in Memphis, where he was supporting a sanitation workers’ strike, dealt a devastating blow to the civil rights movement.

 

For years, conspiracy theories have swirled around these events, with some suggesting involvement by foreign powers, organized crime, or even U.S. intelligence agencies. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services and the nephew of JFK, has been a vocal proponent of the theory that the CIA played a role in his uncle’s assassination. “My father’s first instinct was that the agency killed his brother,” RFK Jr. said in a Fox News interview.

 

While experts and historians remain divided on what the newly declassified documents might reveal, the release is seen as a critical step toward addressing lingering questions. “What did happen? It’s very hard to say, and I don’t have a theory,” Morley said. “But that’s why we need to see the rest of the records.”

 

A new chapter in American history

 

Trump’s executive order represents more than just a policy decision; it is a symbolic gesture aimed at restoring trust in government institutions. By prioritizing transparency, the president is signaling a commitment to uncovering the truth, no matter how uncomfortable or inconvenient it may be.

 

As the nation awaits the release of these long-hidden documents, one thing is clear: the quest for truth is far from over. “Lot of people are waiting for this for a long — for years and decades,” Trump said as he signed the order. For the families of JFK, RFK and MLK, as well as for the American people, the promise of transparency offers hope that the full story of these tragic events will finally come to light.

 

In the words of the president, “That’s a big one, huh?” Indeed, it is. And its impact will be felt for generations to come.

 

Sources include:

 

The NationalPulse.com

ABCNews.com

WashingtonPost.com

 

NewsTarget.com © 2022 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

A God-Given Right That Preexists Government

Justin Smith examines the Right to self-protection is God-given and hence gun ownership for protection cannot be overridden by any law manufactured by human hands.

The opinion is sure to chap the hides of the Left seeking to disengage all things of the Biblical God Almighty from the Rule of Law and American cultural thinking. I for one refuse to believe my existence upon physical death dissolves into an amalgamation atoms and molecules into the material world. I’ll trust in God’s Word in Salvation and eventual resurrected life into God’s Kingdom in Christ Jesus the Savior.

As to the usefulness of a bump stock for protection of Life, Liberty and Property: the I see the American Left manufacture law by Judicial fiat rather the consent of the governed or redesign existing law to the detriment of the governed, the more I sense Americans will embark on a new Jeffersonian Declaration of Independence from a tyrannical Left:

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. (YOU should really read entirety)

JRH 12/22/18

So readers, I’ve been using a seven year old laptop to fulfill the

old blogging habit. My lovely wife sprang for an upgrade.

I’m a relatively small-time blogger but with a consistently

growing readership despite some token censorship from the

liberal-oriented blog and social platforms. Still looking to defray Christmas costs.

Whatever my readers can

chip in will be appreciated:

https://www.paypal.me/johnrhouk

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

*****************

A God-Given Right That Preexists Government

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 12/21/2018 2:09 PM

If the American people don't like firearms and the Second Amendment, for any reason, it isn't the President's place to limit or regulate any firearm or accessory by executive order, as President Trump recently did with bump stocks that accelerate a rifle's rate of fire. It is up to the people to repeal the Second Amendment, if they really desire the removal of a negative right that limits what the federal government can do against them. That is the only legitimate recourse. [Blog Editor: Lawsuit in the works]

Even then, any action against the Second Amendment wouldn't negate or abolish our God-given right to self-defense and to bear any weapon for that lawful purpose, under Natural Law and as acknowledged by the Supreme Court in 2008. A majority of sovereign individuals cannot legitimately take away or abrogate the God-given rights of any one sovereign individual.

[Blog Editor: I highly support the concept of the “sovereign individual” yet only in the context Judeo-Christian faith. I reject most of the ideology of the Sovereign Citizen Movement as inimical to representative government that lead to terrorism inflicting chaos on the community of citizens who wittingly or unwittingly themselves to the social contract of representative government. AND although I reject the idiotic extremist ideology of Sovereign Citizens; if or when the government bypasses the interest of the Represented (i.e. We The People) violating Rights created by the Creator, then sovereign individuals can resist the government along terms articulated by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. Those terms do not vacate government taxation unless the taxation is levied without the consent of the governed. AND those terms insure the Rights of individuals to band together to protect God-Given Life, Godly-Liberty and legitimately acquired Property. And for clarity’s sake – that is my interpretive opinion. Full disclosure my opinion is not absolute though I feel valid:

o   Locke's Political Philosophy

o   Reason to Ratify: The Influence of John Locke's Religious Beliefs on the Creation and Adoption of the United States Constitution

o   John Locke and the founding fathers

o   INDIVIDUALS ARE SOVEREIGN – NOT THE GOVERNMENT (Andrew Napolitano)]

The federal government absolutely does not have the right and authority to regulate our God-given Right to possess and carry any weapon for the Lawful purpose of Self-Defense. And neither do the states.

In Heller v District of Columbia in 2008, the Supreme Court acknowledged that our right to keep and bear arms was a God-given right that preexists government and the Constitution and went further, stating individuals could own weapons of the same sophistication and technological advancement as the military.

States are able to so readily infringe on our right, by demanding permits and fees and such, and have made their illegitimate and illegal acts de facto law, because the people have allowed it; but the states' might-still-does-not-make-right and neither does ANY majority vote that seeks to vote away a God-given right as seen in Natural Law and God's Creation. These laws have stood simply because people have been too afraid of their government to push back against them, as individuals, and/or as an entire people, they have lacked the political will up until the most recent years. [Blog Editor: Interesting PDF entitled. “Influence of the Natural Law Theology of the Declaration of Independence on the Establishment of Personhood in the United States Constitution,” 2008]

I say carry when and if one wishes, anytime. If everyone did this, the law couldn't arrest the nation. And those who do get arrested should question the authority of the State to do so, on the Constitutional grounds of the Second Amendment. Eventually the Supreme Court will be forced to recognize, so long as a person isn't committing any crime with his firearm, he has the right to have it on him, anytime, regardless of whether he or she is black, white, red, yellow, brown or pink.

ANY "Law" restricting one's right to carry a firearm is No Law at All and Should Be IGNORED And REPEALED.

I fault any president who doesn't understand our founding and its principles thoroughly enough to articulate the same position I just did. Instead, we have had a long train of presidents who, despite their on-the-record campaign statements, have seemed all too willing to go along with the illiberal tyrannically bent Democrats and their activist judge lackeys in their machinations to disarm Americans at every opportunity. And that's just the plain facts of the matter ... no hyperbole here.

by Justin O Smith

________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith