If you are a Slanted Right individual it would be exciting news to hear there was a scandalous crime committed by President Barack Hussein Obama that produced an impeachable in the House of Representatives. That is not a nice thing to think of the elected leader of the United States of America and by extension in American thinking the Free World.
Way back when BHO and Hillary rose to the top of the Dem Party process as candidates representing their Party for President, it was my sense that both had a path of corruption, anti-American activities, anti-Original Intent Constitutional agendas or all of the above. Of course BHO won that nomination for the Dems. Regardless of the polls I suspect either a Hillary or a BHO nomination would have beaten the McCain/Palin ticket and Governor Sarah Palin would still be a political rock star on the Right.
The Left Wing media was to simply very successful in vilifying President G.W. Bush and by extension the Republican Party. I doubt that even a RINO that did not even pretend to have Left Slanted aspirations would have won an election against a simple Dem platform of effective political change of the status quo in Washington, DC. In fact I believe that BHO won the Dem nomination as a mandate for “Change” more than promises of universal healthcare and spreading the wealth. The deceptive promise of “Change” was so effective that voters did not care that President BHO’s past is shrouded in a paper trail mystery, his heroes were Marxists, his upbringing sympathetic to Islamic issues (e.g. hatred of Israel) and his mentors were racistBlack Liberation enthusiasts.
WorldNetDaily ran a story yesterday claiming there was documentation to impeach President BHO. I enthusiastically read the article written by Bob Unruh hoping to be excited. The fact is that I found disappointment in the article. The only real documentation written about was actually logical guesses resulting from the lack of documentation and unproved (yet probably true) past dirty politics. The only real meat was President BHO’s current disastrous record with the economy and foreign policy. Unfortunately I don’t think stupid decisions are an impeachable offense especially with a Dem Party dominated Congress. Perhaps November 2010 will change the balance of power in November.
Do not be duped: Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is NOT a moderate Muslim of the kind the West dreams exist. He is one of those Muslims that will speak one thing to his listeners in America and another thing to his fellow Muslims in Arabic. I cannot believe there is not the same outcry about a person who supports America’s enemies is given a pass to build a Mosque near Ground Zero in the name of Freedom of Religion.
Herb London is another of a growing amount people who recognize the obvious about the Terrorist Mosque (aka Ground Zero Mosque, 9/11 Mosque, Cordoba House et al) near the site where Islamic terrorists killed nearly 3000 people. The recognition is that building a Mosque so close to Ground Zero is acquiescence to Radical Islam’s declaration of war on America. This makes building a Mosque with connections to Wahhabi/Salafi Islam an Obamination Abomination.
I am very much against abortion for it is murder of an unborn child. A fetus is not an appendage like a kidney, liver or heart. Rather a fetus is a spirit-person enwrapped in developing flesh. Now that you know what the Left might call my radical pro-life beliefs you might be surprised to know that I have views in which abortion is acceptable.
At the top of mind in most cases I would support an abortion if the mother to-be was raped, a victim or willing participant to incest and to save the life of the mother when there is no other choice. I believe everyone that has an abortion merely as a means of birth control are murderers. STILL the Blood of Jesus extends His Grace to murderers. God have mercy on a repentant baby-killer.
With my thoughts on abortion you can form an opinion on a new drug approved by the FDA that is billed as better than the Morning After Pill.
Here is a question of principle: Is it ok for a Conservative to speak at events in which the sponsors and promoters support issues that are revolting to Conservatives? Let’s add clarity to the question. A Conservative proclaims he/she speaks at anti-Conservative or events that do not support core Conservative principles because they are willing to walk into a hostile room to promote Conservatism. Is this a betrayal of the Conservative movement to be a speaker at such an event that would be abhorrent to Conservatives?
These questions have become a heated dispute between Ann Coulter and Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily. Below is the WND version of the dispute.
