DONATE

Monday, July 5, 2010

Sharia Law For Non-Muslims




Islam is a religion of peace. Islam protects women and makes them special. There is no violence in Islam. Mohammed is the perfect man. Islamic Law – Sharia Law – is the perfect divine law for all humanity.

POPPYCOCK!

Political Islam has a book for sale or a PDF file for download that reveals the reality of Sharia Law. Make a comparison to Western Law.

JRH 7/5/10

Hector Aleem Update from Mehwish Aleem



John R. Houk
© July 5, 2010


I posted my last update about Hector Aleem HERE. Since there is nearly ZERO reporting Hector’s plight from the American Mainstream Media (MSM) I will provide a brief but certainly inadequate synopsis. Hector is a Pakistani Christian whose ministry has been to be a voice of the very few Christian Pakistanis that reside in Pakistan. Hector is being railroaded by the Pakistani legal system based on Sharia Law with the charge of blasphemy. In Hector’s case his accused crime is insulting Islam:

The reason for his incarceration is the religion of peace’s Sharia Law has labeled him a blasphemer for allegedly sending a blasphemous text message to a cleric. Blasphemy is code for insulting Islam or that perfect human being Mohammed. Such an accusation under Sharia Law is not a good outcome for an accused Muslim and certain death for a Christian. That good old Sharia Law which is the measuring stick of being a good Muslim stipulating that ye old kafir blasphemers must die for insulting Islam.

The reality is Aleem sent no such text and was framed for attempting to protect a Christian Church in Pakistan. …
(From SlantRight.com link above)


Hector’s daughter sent an update about Hector. She sent it out to all Facebook subscribers of Free Hector Aleem.

JRH 7/5/10 (I provided next nothing in editing)
*******************************
What happened to Hector Aleem when he disappeared!

By: Mehwish Aleem sent a message to the members of Free Hector Aleem.
Sent: July 3, 2010 at 3:12pm


Dear all group members,

First of all welcome all new group members, please invite your friends to join this group.

1st July was daddy's hearing and luckily I got five minutes to meet him and he told me lots of things in those five minutes. Here are the details:

Daddy told me that people from FIA (Fedral investigation Agency) came and took daddy to some unknown place. There they kept him for five days and during those five days they beat him and tortured him mentaly and physically. Daddy told me that members of Sunni Tehreek (a terrorist organization in Pakistan) and their head Mulana Tahir Iqbal Chisti who is also the plantiff of our case was there. We only know that they tortured daddy, but we dont know how they tortured him because we had only five minutes. But daddy showed me his swelled hands and feet which had bruises on them. He was very very weak and he could barely stand. Then he told me that a person named Shehzad who is 25 years old and is locked up in a cell next to daddy's cell made a Crucifix on a bed sheet. Then he disrespected the Cross by walking on it and after that he urinated and spitted on it and then he wiped feces with it. When daddy informed Ashraf (head Warder) and Imtiaz (an Incharge who assists Ashraf) then they not only encouraged that man and also didn't take any action against him. They told him if he do it next time then they would be more happy of him and he would be given much more facilities in jail. In the end daddy said “first I was being tortured physically and now they are hurting me religiously and mentally". Daddy is not allowed to go to Church, not on Christmas nor Easter. He is not even allowed to pray in his own cell. Its a request to please tell the Suprietendent o the jail to let daddy pray and visit Church. I am giving you his address and phone number, but remember DO NOT day (sic) anything against Islam or Pakistan because that can put daddy's life in danger.

Here is the address:

To the Suprintendant of Jail
Adyala Jail
Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Phone number [t]o suprintendent is: 0092-51-557-4786

Daddy is being kept in a death cell which is a very small and dark room. He can only see the sky when he comes out for the hearing.

*****Update of Hearing*****

The Judge was absent so nothing happened and the next date is 7th July 2010. It is requested to please keep on donating as the lawyer is asking for his fee. The lawyer is not moving without the fee and we must give him the fee asap to get daddy out of that jail. You can donate through any way you want, and any amount you can. You can donate through pay pal and through western union or any other way.

Here is the link to the paypal: Hector Aleem

[Editor: in case the above link to PayPal does not work, try this Facebook link that at my Facebook messenge center.]

And if you wanna donate through western union then contact Mehwish Aleem (in the group Admin)

We recieved each and every kind of amount, from $5 to $1000 so any amount helps.

Keep praying, we need your prayers

Regards

Mehwish Aleem

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Dearborn Police Violate 1st Amendment to Advantage Muslims



John R. Houk
© July 4, 2010


Recently I posted an article inspired by Charles (Chuck) Colson in which the Obama Administration uses Orwellian Newspeak referring to the First Amendment right of Religious Freedom as Freedom of Worship. Just as a short summary for the purpose of this current post, there is a difference between Freedom to practice religion and Freedom to worship as you please.

Free Worship is a confined in a box situation. Religious Freedom is the ability to worship and speak about your faith outside of the box without concern for the State or private citizens from preventing your freedom to practice your religion anywhere in America that is public property. For the Obama Administration (in this Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) to use the Newspeak of “Freedom of Worship” is an indication of the path this Leftist Administration is headed as it pertains to First Amendment Religious Freedom and Free Speech.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. (First Amendment – Cornel University Law School)


Now there is evidence that the Obama Administration will look the other way as Constitutional Civil Rights are violated when it pertains to Christians. After all, part of the Leftist agenda is to render America’s predominant religion of Christianity a toothless husk of faith that will have no more affect on morality or the rule of law in America. What is the evidence?

The evidence is the Islamic agenda in America taking advantage of the Leftist agenda in order to violate Constitutional First Amendment Rights of the adherents of the Christian Faith. At least two groups of Christians went to Dearborn(istan), Michigan at an Islamic festival. One (or so I understand) went to share the Good News of Jesus Christ. The other went NOT to proselytize but to ask questions about the Islam represented at the Dearbornistan festival. (I understand that) the first group Christians were prevented from passing out Christian literature and prevented from witnessing and yet curious non-Muslims that attended became the victims of peaceful da’wa (Islamic evangelism205 pg pdf file). The second group of Christians represented Acts 17 Apologetics (YouTube Channel). Amazingly Acts 17 Apologetics has been able to remain on YouTube. It is amazing because YouTube is big on being a dhimmi to Muslim complaints of being offended.

Keep in mind part of Islamic theo-politics is to refuse to allow Islam, its prophet Mohammed or its Allah to be offended. Any of these offenses require a violent response to keep the honor of Islamic Supremacism intact.

The Dearbornistan police force has taken great steps not to allow Muslims to be offended even if the U.S. Constitution guarantees Free Speech and Religious Freedom. In essence the Dearborn police force is breaking the actual meaning of the First Amendment; viz. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. The Dearborn Police Force in reality is securing Islam as the city government supported established religion of Dearborn, Michigan.

This is not a so-called Separation of Church and State issue. Frankly the phrase nowhere exists in the U.S. Constitution. The issue is a government entity protecting a religion’s tenets (viz. Islam) over the tenets of another religion (viz. Christianity).

So check this out! How many clauses of the First Amendment are the Dearborn Police breaking?

    1. Establishing Islam as the city religion.

    2. Preventing the free exercise of religion; viz. Christianity.

    3. Preventing the First Amendment Right of Free Speech.


So where is the Civil Rights outcry from American Mainstream Media (MSM) and the Obama Administration? If it weren’t for small independent grass roots organizations that exist determined to publish the truth of Islamic principles most American voters and citizens would not have a clue of this egregious violation of the First Amendment. When the Civil Rights Movement was moving in high gear to stop discrimination and prejudice in the South, American National Guardsmen were sent to enforce the rule of law since local officials and police refused to do so. Shucks partner I remember as a kid watching then Governor Wallace of Alabama forced out of the way as an African-American was escorted to a previously Whites Only school. This was the case of the rights of the minority being protected over the rights of the local majority.

Effectively the Dearborn Police are segregating and establishing the minority religion so that the majority religion is faced with non-Constitutional segregation of Dearbornistan Muslims from Christian Free Speech – spoken and written - and the free practice of religion on public property.

Now how did I hear about this travesty of Justice and disregard of the American Constitution? I read about this from the email list alert sent out by the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission. The CADC email linked to a story entitled, “Dearborn Michigan Police Hostile Towards Christians”. If you go to that link, you will discover there is a YouTube video from Acts 17 Apologetics. This is the video I have linked above. That video was of a Muslim festival on June 21, 2009. Now I’m not sure if that was a mistake or not because after looking at the YouTube site for Acts 17 Apologetics I discovered a June 21, 2010 Muslim festival exposé that better fits the description of the CADC article. Evidently the CADC researches did not look for the most recent video of the Dearborn Police Force stomping on the First Amendment Rights of Christians to freely practice their faith in public and for Christians to exercise their right to Free Speech.

JRH 7/4/10




Saturday, July 3, 2010

Independence Forever!



Mark Alexander of the Patriot Post has some excellent Independence Day thoughts.

JRH 7/3/10
***********************************
Independence Forever!

By Mark Alexander
July 1, 2010
Patriot Post


"The Declaration of Independence [is the] declaratory charter of our rights, and the rights of man." --Thomas Jefferson


The principal author of our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, understood that, though Liberty is "endowed by our Creator," it is difficult to maintain among men. "The natural progress of things," he wrote, "is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."

Indeed it is. We boldly threw off a monarchy in the American Revolution, but today countless bureaucrats under the command of a pack of hardcore Socialists have assumed the throne.

Jefferson also understood the consequences of Socialism: "Were we directed from Washington when to sow, and when to reap, we should soon want bread." But 234 years after the signing of our Declaration of Independence, Beltway politicos, most of the "Democrat" variety, insist that we must conduct ourselves, in matters large and small, according to their will -- and would have us believe they know better than we. Indeed, they have so effectively institutionalized this deceit that their electoral lemmings fall in behind them in lock step.

That subservience is an affront to our hard-won heritage of Liberty, and an insult to those generations who have defended it.

On July 4th of 1776, our Founders, assembled as representatives to the Second Continental Congress, issued a declaration stating most notably: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. ... That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..."

In other words, the Founders rightly affirmed that because our rights are inherent by Natural Law as granted from our Creator, as such they can't be arbitrarily alienated by those who believed that the rights of men are gifts of government.

Our Founders publicly declared their intentions to defend these rights by attaching their signatures to the Declaration between July 4th and August 2nd of 1776. They and their fellow Patriots pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor as they set about to defend the Natural Rights of man.

At the conclusion of the American War for Independence in 1783, our Founders determined that the new nation needed a more suitable alliance among the states than the Articles of Confederation. After much deliberation, they proposed a Constitution, which authorized a very limited central governing authority and reserved all other rights to the states or the people. Our Constitution was adopted in 1787, ratified in 1788, and implemented in 1789 as subordinate guidance to our Declaration of Independence.

Since that time, generations of American Patriots have laid down their lives "to support and defend" the Essential Liberty enshrined in our Constitution. I would note here that their sacred oath, the same one I have taken many times in the service of our country, is not in support and defense of a so-called "living Constitution," an adulterated version of our authentic Constitution. It is under such perversion that Socialists in the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches have advanced their statist political agenda.

Statism, or Progressivism as promoted by contemporary American Leftists, has as its objective the establishment of an omnipotent central government authorized to be the arbiter of all that is "good" for "the people." Statism also confers upon the state ultimate control over the most significant social manifestation of individual rights, that of economic enterprise. Witness our current government's efforts to assert ever-greater control over heretofore private enterprises such as the automotive, health care, financial and energy industries.

Socialists endeavor to undermine our nation's founding principles in order to achieve their statist objectives, under which all associations among individuals ultimately augment the power and control of the state. The final expression and inevitable terminus of such power and control, if allowed to progress unabated, is tyranny.

The word "tyranny" is derived from the Latin "tyrannus," which translates to "illegitimate ruler."

Leftists in all levels of government, who, by definition, have deserted their oaths to support and defend our bona fide Constitution, are thus as illegitimate as the rules they implement.

Thank God there is a strong resurgence of demand for Essential Liberty and the Rule of Law across the Fruited Plain; a rebirth of the understanding that limited government is essential to Liberty; and a resounding call to take control of our national destiny and reset its course for the shores of freedom.

So how should we observe this 4th of July, the 234th celebration of our Declaration of Independence?

On July 3, 1776, Founding Patriot John Adams wrote to his beloved wife, Abigail, on this very topic:

Yesterday, the greatest question was decided, which ever was debated in America, and a greater, perhaps, never was or will be decided among men. You will see in a few days a Declaration setting forth the causes which have impelled us to this mighty revolution, and the reasons which will justify it in the sight of God and man. ... It ought to be commemorated as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shews, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations from one end of this Continent to the other from this time forward forever more. You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will triumph in that Day's Transaction.


Today, we face ominous threats to our American heritage of Liberty, unfortunately more so from enemies within than without, and I would offer that we should commemorate this Independence Day, first and foremost, with "solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty," and with a rededication to the principles of Essential Liberty and restoration of the Rule of Law.

On December 19th of 1776, with the American Revolution well under way, Thomas Paine wrote, "Let it be told to the future world, that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive, the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, we came forth to meet and to repulse it. ... I call not upon a few, but upon all: not on this state or that state, but on every state; up and help us; lay your shoulders to the wheel; better have too much force than too little, when so great an object is at stake."

And so it must be, today.

Reflecting on the Declaration shortly before his death on July 4th, 1826, the 50th anniversary of our founding, Thomas Jefferson wrote, "This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take."

It is entirely fitting that Jefferson's fellow Patriot and longtime correspondent would also draw his last breath on that very day. But before he passed, John Adams offered these words of reflection: "[W]hat do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations. ... This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution."

And Adams's last public words serve as an inspiration to us all, a toast to Liberty: "Independence forever!"

Libertas! And let us all say, Amen.

We Need Your Help

From our inception to this day, we at The Patriot Post have been vigilant against the threats to our Constitution, and we remain steadfast in our advocacy for Rule of Law. Not since the first American Revolution has our nation faced more crucial battles for liberty.

Please make a secure online donation to The Patriot's 2010 Independence Day campaign. If you prefer to support us by mail, please use our printable donor form.

Also, we will not publish the normal Friday Digest this week in order to spend time with our families to celebrate America's independence. We'll be back on Monday, July 5.

______________________________
The Patriot is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of our readers. The Patriot is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and in accordance with the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Copyright © 2010 The Patriot Post.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Free Worship or Free Religion



John R. Houk
© July 2, 2010


Chuck Colson was listening to a Hillary Clinton Secretary of State speech. Hillary used a phrase in that speech that caught Colson’s attention: “Freedom of Worship.”

Colson believes the phrase is Orwellian “Newspeak” by obfuscating the word “Worship”. As Colson points out there is a vast difference between freedom of Worship and Freedom of Religion. The first is to keep your religious beliefs private and the later is to freely practice your faith openly including sharing or espousing the high principles of your faith without worry of retribution.

If one is forced to keep their religious thoughts/beliefs to themselves, one cannot say something affirming morality or disdaining publicly atheism or someone else’s anti-religion opinion. The concept of Freedom of Worship is the European concept of Freedom. This is to say one has Freedom of Speech as long as it does not offend someone. The example of European Freedom is the plight of Geert Wilders who is facing prosecution for hate-speech. His offense was speaking the truth about Islam. European Leftists have thrown people in jail for openly sharing their faith with Muslims or homosexuals. People have been prosecuted in Europe for saying homosexuality is a sin.

This is the path of Freedom of Worship instead if Freedom of Religion. Chuck says it better than I. Chuck has about a four minute he calls the Two Minute Warning in which he articulates this much better than I.

JRH 7/2/10
***************************
Chuck Colson Email Elert
From Manhattan Declaration
Sent: July 2, 2010 9:32:55 AM


This is an urgent alert.


You need to know about what may be one of the gravest, most insidious threats to religious freedom I've seen in my lifetime: What may be an attempt, at the very highest levels of government, to RE-DEFINE the very meaning of religious freedom, from "free exercise" to merely private worship.


If what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in a speech at Georgetown University reflects a new direction in government policy, then mark my words, our religious liberties are in peril.

Please, click on the link below to see my "Two Minute Warning" video commentary at the Manhattan Declaration website to see exactly what I'm talking about.


Study carefully the play on words; words matter.


I urge you: Watch this video, share it with friends. Blog about it. Write a letter to the editor of your newspaper - point out what is going on. It's time to expose this outrageous and dangerous assault on religious freedom.


We cannot be asleep at our posts while we still have the freedom to speak out.


Chuck Colson

++++++++++++++++++++++++

From the “Watch this video” link


Two-Minute Warning
Freedom of Worship: an anorexic description of our rights

By Chuck Colson
Published Date: June 30, 2010
Colson Center


Chuck Colson is sounding the alarm: The government—at the highest levels—may be attempting to redefine the very meaning of religious freedom. If what Secretary of State Hilary Clinton said in a recent speech reflects a new direction in government policy, it seems the aim is clear: To kick faith out of the public square, to send Christians into the closet.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
'Freedom of Worship' Worries: New religious freedom rhetoric within the Obama administration draws concern.

By Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra
July 02, 2010
Manhattan Declaration
Originally posted: Christianity Today


"Freedom of worship" has recently replaced the phrase "freedom of religion" in public pronouncements from the Obama administration. Experts are concerned that the new rhetoric may signal a policy change.

"Freedom of worship" first appeared in President Obama's November remarks at the memorial service for the victims of the Fort Hood shooting. Days later, he referred to worship rather than religion in speeches in Japan and China.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton echoed the shift in language. In a December speech at Georgetown University, she used "freedom of worship" three times but "freedom of religion" not at all. While addressing senators in January, she referred to "freedom of worship" four times and "freedom of religion" once when quoting an earlier Obama speech.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom noted the shift in its 2010 annual report. "This change in phraseology could well be viewed by human rights defenders and officials in other countries as having concrete policy implications," the report said.

Freedom of worship means the right to pray within the confines of a place of worship or to privately believe, said Nina Shea, director of the Center for Religious Freedom and member of the commission. "It excludes the right to raise your children in your faith; the right to have religious literature; the right to meet with co-religionists; the right to raise funds; the right to appoint or elect your religious leaders, and to carry out charitable activities, to evangelize, [and] to have religious education or seminary training."

The State Department does acknowledge that worship is just one component of religion, said spokesperson Andy Laine. "However, the terms 'freedom of religion' and 'freedom of worship' have often been used interchangeably through U.S. history, and policymakers in this administration will sometimes do likewise."

While Obama's administration may simply be using different words to say the same thing, the timing of the change is worrisome, said Thomas Farr, religion professor at Georgetown University. Obama just recently announced an ambassador for international religious freedom (Suzan Johnson Cook), but the position has been demoted within the State Department.

"It puts what otherwise might have been passed off as a rhetorical shift under the spotlight a little more," Farr said.

The softened message is probably meant for the Muslim world, said Carl Esbeck, professor of law at the University of Missouri. Obama, seeking to repair relations fractured by 9/11, is telling Islamic countries that America is not interfering with their internal matters, he said.

As with all diplomatic decisions, the move is a gain and a loss, Esbeck said. Other countries may interpret the change as a sign that America is backing down from championing a robust, expansive view of religious freedom, which if true would be a loss, he said.

But the State Department has traditionally ignored religion's impact on foreign affairs, he said. "The Obama administration seems, at least in part, to get that a large part of successful foreign relations is taking religion into account."

If Obama is telling the State Department to be religiously sensitive, that's a gain, Esbeck said.

Not everyone agrees.

"If [Obama is changing language to signal sensitivity], it is terribly shortsighted and self-defeating," Farr said. "It will not work, and it will simply make the situation more difficult … to engage."

Shea said the danger is greater than a mere backfiring. "I'm very fearful that by building bridges, we're actually stepping away from this fundamental principle of religious freedom. … It is so critical for Western, especially American, leaders to articulate strong defense for religious freedom and explain what that means and how it undergirds our entire civilization."

______________________
Free Worship or Free Religion
John R. Houk
© July 2, 2010
___________________
About Manhattan Declaration

___________________
The Chuck Colson For Christian World View About Page
Copyright © 2010 Colson Center. All Rights Reserved.

Mosque: Breeding Ground of Terror



Here is an Islamic educational moment for non-Muslims courtesy of Ben’s Blog.

JRH 7/2/10
******************************
Mosque: Breeding Ground of Terror

Posted by Ben
Jul 1, 2010 at 9:11 PM
Ben’s Blog


In this video, which I found in a post by Barenaked Islam, Walid Shoebat tells it as it is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-95_6cqQX8M



When Muslims wave those signs declaring that "Islam will dominate the world", where do they get that idea? The concept comes from the title of a topic in Ibn Kathir's Tafsir. Ibn Kathir was an expert who learned Islam's canon from experts. His tafsir is the most widely accepted [Biography at Wikipedia.]

    The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World

    The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book

    The Good News that Islam shall prevail


How will that come to pass? By jihad. What is jihad? This is how Islamic law defines it, from Reliance of the Traveller. [Emphasis & links added.]

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

``We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.''

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- ``Fighting is prescribed for you'' (Koran 2:216);

-2- ``Slay them wherever you find them'' (Koran 4:89);

-3- ``Fight the idolators utterly'' (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

``I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah'';

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

``To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it. ''Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-0.html



Why jihad? Because Allah commands it in Surah al-Anfal 39 & Surah at-Taubah 29. Moe confirmed the commands in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

    The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr

    The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah

    The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas

    The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and Hypocrites


The jihad imperatives are codified in Reliance, O9.8 & 9.9.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),


the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

"I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,"

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi' (y21), 6.48-49) ).



Why would Allah issue such commandments? Ostensibly to save the world from temporal strive and eternal damnation by bringing them "with chains on their necks until they embrace Islam"; to make Islam "superior" & dominant. [9:33, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65]. The real reason is not buried too deep. Nobody else will show you this, but I will because I want you to know the truth.[Emphasis added.]

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: "The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger." So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad ) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allâh is Able to do all things.

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

48:20. Allâh has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah:

The Prophet said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.

1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.

2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).

5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:

The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.



Who gets the spoils? Allah and his Messenger. How much loot can an idol eat or spend? Got that clue yet? Moe gets the first 20%, off the top, his pick; that includes captive women. Allah promised them abundant spoils which they would capture, and caused them to "inherit" their victims' real and personal property, plus their widows and orphans. Allah gave Moe special dispensation to accrue spoils because he saw Moe's weakness and humility.

President Bush spoke of a "war of Ideas" but never specified the ideas. I will. 234 years ago our founders made a crucial declaration of the rights of man.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/



Islam has some incompatible ideas: Only Allah has the right to be worshiped, Only Allah has the right to rule and Muslims are obligated to enforce Allah's rights.

In 8:67, quoted above, Allah identifies Moe's motivation: ransom money, and his own: great slaughter. If our eyes and minds are open, that tells us everything we need to know about Islam Why did Walid Shoebat say "it can not be tolerated, it can not be allowed? What will you do about it? You have knowledge which you lacked before. Will you share that knowledge with others by sending them a link to this blog post? Will you demand that Islam be proscribed by law through the International Qur'an Petition? If not us, who; if not now, when?

_______________________
Ben's Blog

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Virginia Thomas: Champion of Conservative People



John R. Houk
© July 1, 2010


WorldNetDaily has sent out a profile of the work of Virginia Thomas the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Virginia is becoming very active in grass roots educating of people about America’s First Principles; hence a focus on the Constitution and raising the alarm of Barack Hussein Obama’s agenda into transforming America into a Socialist nation making the rule of law deviant from the original intent of the U.S. Constitution.

Virginia Thomas Gave a speech for The Leadership Institute. At the 10 minute 38 second point of the video Virginia is introduced with a brief rundown of who she is which is followed Virginia’s speech. So to skip all the preliminaries and get to the meat, I suggest fast forwarding to the mark indicated.

Virginia, “Ginni,” Thomas is a new social entrepreneur and the Founder of Liberty Central, Inc. Liberty Central is a non-profit, non-tax deductible organization which will have a user-friendly, entertaining, and educational website designed to provide an online community for visitors to preserve freedom and reaffirm the core founding principles.

Ginni is excited about launching LibertyCentral.org and finds the new citizen activists inspirational. She brings passion, enthusiasm and principled participation to the public square. Ginni is committed to serving as a clearinghouse for new and more effective online activism.

She was previously director of executive branch relations at The Heritage Foundation. In this capacity, she worked to advance Heritage’s policy recommendations on a range of foreign and domestic issues among decision-makers in the executive branch.

Before coming to Heritage, Ginni handled oversight responsibilities for the House Majority Leader’s Office. From 1993 to 1995, she was senior policy coordinator for the House Republican Conference.

Prior to that she was deputy assistant secretary of labor and a labor counsel for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Thomas also served on the legislative staff of former Rep. Hal Daub, R-Neb.
(Virginia’s The Leadership Institute bio)


Here is WorldNetDaily’s profile of Virginia Thomas and her work with LibertyCentral.org.

JRH 7/1/10