I am cross posting below information I found from Telegram Natural News. The
information comes in two Telegram posts and so I’m sharing as Part One &
Two. The topic is President Trump offering to reinstate U.S. Military Personnel
removed from Service by the Biden Tyranny for refusing the mRNA Jab Mandate.
Each Natural News post has a Brighteon Video link to Lt. Col.
Theresa Long, MD testifying in 2022 that the mRNA showed alarming evidence of
danger. I’m showing the video once at the top of the Part One version.
Lt. Col. Theresa Long, MD (screengrab
from Brighteon Video)
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by
offering healthy coffee products. BETTER YOUR HEALTH with healthy & good
tasting COFFEE and enjoy some weight management supplements. BUY Happy Coffee
& Weight Loss Supplements at the Diana Wellness Store: https://dianawellnessstore.com
"As you can see, the total
number of reportable events went from 110,000 in 2020 to over 200,000 in
2022," reported Dr. Long.
"Compare this to the 93 deaths
of service members that were attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clearly, the
risk of the vaccine has already outweighed the benefit."
Full
Video: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/12/covid-19-vaccines-what-they-are-how-they-work-and-possible-causes-of-injuries/ref/8/
(Blog Editor: In two different browsers a certificate warning appeared for
the RedVoiceMedia.com link followed by a “Could Not Be Found” when I ignored
the warning.)]
President Donald Trump has pledged to reinstate thousands of
service members who were dismissed from the military for refusing the Wuhan
coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.
He declared during his inauguration speech Monday, Jan. 20:
"I will reinstate any service members who were unjustly expelled from our
military for objecting to the COVID-19 vaccine." These soldiers, Trump
added, would receive "full back pay." The president's promise aligns
with that of Pete Hegseth, his nominee for defense secretary.
"Tens of thousands of service members were kicked out
because of an experimental vaccine," Hegseth told senators during his Jan.
14 confirmation hearing. "They will be apologized to. They will be
reinstated, reinstituted with pay and rank."
The Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which
was in effect from August 2021 to January 2023, led to the dismissal of
approximately 8,000 service members who refused the vaccine. While officials at
the Department of Defense have argued that these dismissals did not harm
military readiness, conservative lawmakers and critics have long contended that
the mandate weakened America's armed forces.
Trump's promise to reinstate these troops highlights his
belief that the mandate was not only unjust, but also detrimental to national
security. His comments reflect a broader critique of the Biden administration's
handling of the military during the pandemic, with critics arguing that the
mandate prioritized political agendas over the well-being and readiness of the
armed forces.
The Biden administration's vaccine mandate has been a
contentious issue since its implementation. While military personnel are
required to receive numerous vaccines as part of their service, the COVID-19
vaccine became a flashpoint due to its rapid development and the polarized
political climate surrounding it.
Cost of reinstatement: Hundreds of millions of dollars
The reinstatement of these service members, however, comes
with significant financial implications. Back pay alone could cost the federal
government hundreds of millions of dollars. Despite the expense, Trump and
Hegseth view this as a necessary step to rectify what they see as a grave
injustice.
Critics of the mandate argue that it undermined trust in
military leadership and eroded the principle of voluntary service. But even
though it has been two years since the vaccine mandate was lifted, Trump's
promise also raises questions about how many of the dismissed troops would be
willing to return to military service after years in civilian life.
Trump's promise to reinstate dismissed troops is not just
about correcting a perceived wrong; it is also a statement about health freedom
and individual choice. By reversing his predecessor's mandate, Trump is
signaling a return to policies that prioritize personal autonomy and trust in
service members’ judgment. This approach resonates with many who view the
mandate as an overreach of government authority.
As Trump and Hegseth move forward with their plans, the
debate over the COVID-19 vaccine mandate and its impact on military readiness
is likely to continue. For the thousands of service members who were dismissed,
Trump's promise offers a chance at redemption and a return to the ranks. For
the nation, it represents a broader shift in military policy – one that
prioritizes strength, unity and the principles of health freedom.
In a time of global uncertainty, Trump's pledge to rebuild
the military and restore those who were dismissed over the vaccine mandate is a
clear signal of his second administration's priorities. The issue of health
freedom and military readiness will remain at the forefront of national
discourse as the Trump administration takes shape.
President Donald Trump announced that he would reinstate
thousands of military personnel who were discharged for refusing the Wuhan
coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.
During his inauguration, Trump declared, "This week, I
will reinstate any service members who were unjustly expelled from our military
for objecting to the COVID vaccine mandate with full back pay."
He also pledged to sign an order to prevent military
personnel from being subjected to what he called "radical political
theories and social experiments" while on duty.
"Our armed forces will be freed to focus on their sole
mission: defeating America's enemies," Trump emphasized.
The COVID-19 vaccine mandate, imposed under former President
Joe Biden in 2021, required all military personnel to receive the vaccine or
face discharge. While the mandate was intended to protect troops from the
virus, it sparked widespread controversy.
Over 16,000 service members requested religious or medical
exemptions, but the vast majority were denied. As a result, more than 8,000
troops were discharged for refusing the vaccine, a decision that critics argue
undermined military readiness and violated individual rights.
The mandate was eventually rescinded in 2023 following
bipartisan legislation passed by Congress and signed by Biden. However, the law
did not automatically reinstate discharged personnel, leaving thousands of
veterans in limbo. Trump's announcement seeks to correct this injustice by
ensuring that these service members are welcomed back into the military with
full back pay, restored rank and even apologies for the treatment they endured.
Reinstatement of discharged service members a vindication
The mandate paved over the legitimate concerns many service
members had about the COVID-19 vaccine, including its rapid development,
potential side effects and the conflicts taking the vaccine would have with
their religious beliefs.
Moreover, the mandate's implementation was marred by
bureaucratic failures. Multiple courts found that the military violated federal
law in processing religious exemption requests, and a federal watchdog
concluded that several branches mishandled exemption applications. These
findings underscore the need for accountability and reform within the
military’s leadership.
Trump's nominee for Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, has
been a vocal advocate for reinstating discharged troops. During his
confirmation hearings, Hegseth emphasized that these service members were
"forced out due to an experimental vaccine" and deserved to be
reinstated with their honor intact.
Critics of the reinstatement plan argue that it could
undermine military discipline and set a dangerous precedent. They also point to
the potential financial burden of providing back pay to the discharged service
members.
I terminated my TV cable due to excessive billing. Sadly
that meant no more ESPN. And I guess I’m too much of a cheapskate to fork out
the extra cash for whatever app on my Smart TV that might carry ESPN.
That meant mega-football fan me, has missed NCAA Playoffs
and whenever the NCAA Championship Game will be aired.
AND it means I miss airings of ESPN Monday Night Football
(MNF). Which also means I missed the viewing of Damar Hamlin experiencing
cardiac arrest after tackling receiver Tee Higgins.
I have watched the video clips. To me, I did not see a
vicious hit out if the ordinary in NFL action. I have seen the propaganda
machine begin to gear up though to steer blame away from a mRNA Jab result.
To my knowledge there has been official confirmation that
Damar Hamlin was Jabbed, BUT it is my understanding the Buffalo Bills is fairly
proud that they mandated their players to get the Jab. ERGO, it is also a fair
assumption that Hamlin was Jabbed along with his teammates. (Cole
Beasley resisted Jab as a Bill and even endured flak from brainwashed fans.)
First of all, just to prove there is a Jab Sudden Death or
Crazy Jab Injury, HERE IS A 2-MINUTE VIDEO related to the Jab (which included
Hamlin):
“Died suddenly” is now one of the
top searches trending on Google and Twitter as Damar Hamlin clings to life
following his cardiac arrest during Monday Night Football. Speculation swirls
about whether Hamlin's collapse on the field was due to external factors, the
experimental COVID injection, or something in between. After initially agreeing
Hamlin may have suffered commotio cordis, renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter
McCullough told entrepreneur Steve Kirsch he was now under the impression the
player suffered a heart attack and that if vaccinated, vaccine-induced
myocarditis should be taken into consideration. No doubt Hamlin’s sudden
collapse looked similar to other athletes’ recent fainting spells, which seem
to have increased in frequency in the wake of the Covid jab rollout.
Below are a few posts contradicting the BRAINWASH-science
with the actual science of the devastation that can occur with the mRNA Jab.
JRH 1/4/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Following the medical diagnosis of Buffalo Bills' Defensive
Back Damar Hamlin after he had a cardiac arrest on the field while clutching
his chest, a national red-pill moment struck. Dr. Peter McCullough has
suggested that the events were a potential result of myocarditis caused by the
NFL mandates.
Last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight (FOX News) I told
America that there is a building public health obligation to disclose what
happened in a case of cardiac arrest and sudden death when it is unexpected
with no antecedent disease.
[Blog Editor: There is no Rumble Embed available so here’s
a Twitter video of the Tucker segment:]
Dr. Peter McCullough on the disturbing trend of cardiac events in professional athletes and the possible correlation from the c19 vaccine causing myocarditis. pic.twitter.com/qes22oosP4
I walked Tucker through the differential diagnosis and
concluded that in the case of Damar Hamlin, that COVID-19 vaccine-induced
subclinical myocarditis and then arrhythmic cardiac arrest on the field was at
the top of the list. Tucker said that’s “fair.” I think it’s more than fair
since the NFL had a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, as did the military, many
corporations, universities, and schools. If an EUA vaccine is mandated, then
those who have imposed this product on their players, employees, and students
have an ethical public health obligation to tell the world what has happened as
a result of the mandate and help all those impacted brace for what could happen
next. Damar Hamlin is not just another “unexplained sudden adult death
syndrome” case. It was “prime time” for the NFL and now “truth time” for the
family, Buffalo Bills doctors, and the University of Cincinnati Medical Center
staff. Did he take the vaccine, brand, and doses given? Is the clinical
evaluation consistent with COVID-19 vaccine induced subclinical myocarditis and
resuscitated cardiac arrest? If not, what is the proven cause of his calamity
(hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, anomalous coronary arteries, catecholaminergic
ventricular tachycardia, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, Takotsubo
cardiomyopathy, pulmonary embolus, spinal cord/intracranial injury, etc.). I
anticipate Hamlin will neurologically recover and come off the mechanical
ventilator, so it is possible that the moral obligation of disclosure will be
in his hands at some point in the future. Likely is NFL career has ended, an
ICD will be implanted, but a new mission in public health may lie in front of him.
We pray for his swift and full recovery in the hands of excellent medical staff
and the support of his family and team.
If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to
your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our
efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and
your extended circles.
MURDER charge Pfizer & Moderna & Fauci (FDA, CDC,
NIH) makers of mRNA/DNA gene injection (vaccine), indict them, killing a black
man on live television DAMAR HAMLIN, while lying about commotio cordis
What you need for murder charge to stick is below in
my substacks; he 'died' on the field, they are lying about commotio cordis,
they killed him with this deadly gene vaccine they made Chauvin 2.0
It is time to lay murder charges on Pfizer, Moderna, CDC,
NIH, FDA, NIAID, Fauci, Francis Collins, Walensky, Ashish Jha etc. It is time.
They are telling us to STFU, that we who are asking the
right questions as to what went wrong here, we must STFU. I say under NO
condition will we. Yes, they killed him, they killed DAMAR and know it and we
will continue to go after them for we want all who did this, who brought this
fraud so called vaccine, this entire pandemic fraud, all of it from lockdowns
to the fraud vaccine, properly deposed in proper legal settings, proper
tribunals with proper judges and we want accountability and justice. If judges
rule that all of their money is to be taken, we take it. If judges rule those
involved must be imprisoned, at the highest levels of government, we jail them
for life. We lock them up! If judges rule capital punishment is the remedy, we
seek the death penalty! Does not matter to me who.
They killed a black man, they stopped his heart in front
of you, stopped his breathing with their death shot. DAMAR died for 10 minutes.
From all we know so far. New reports indicate they had to bring him back to
life in the hospital too.
They committed murder on live national television during an
NFL game! They killed a black man! Their gun, weapon of choice was a mRNA/DNA
gene injection ‘so called vaccine’. They know it. They know we are beginning to
grapple with it and ask the right questions and they know the players on that
field who cried, they cried out of love and horror for their teammate, yet they
cried too because they know they are juiced up with the gene fraud injection
and they know that that means, the bell may toll for thee too! Soon.
We want the congressional black caucus in the US congress to
stand up now and defend this black American, DAMA HAMLIN, do the right thing,
get accountability and not just for him and his family, but for all Americans,
for all the other NFL players. We want the NAACP to stand up. You say you seek
justice, you did not get it before, now here is your chance!
Pfizer placed their criminal corporate boot, with CDC and
FDA and NIH and NIAID and Fauci and Francis Collins and Walensky and Albert
Bourla and Bancel, all of them, their placed their money-hungry power-hungry
malfeasant boot on the neck of DAMAR HAMLIN, this is Derek Chauvin once again,
Pfizer is Derek Chauvin with its boot on the neck of George Floyd,
this time George is DAMAR. Yes, DAMAR like George Floyd, could not breathe for
10 minutes, “I can’t breathe”. Pfizer took the life of an African American man
on live national television.
Yes, I am saying it plainly, the Pfizer gene injection
mRNA/DNA vaccine, unless we are shown otherwise, based on all the uncertainty
still, and based on all the unanswered questions, but based on all we DO know,
was the murder weapon that killed DAMAR HAMLIN. Yes, thank God for the medical
response but he died for 10 minutes in front of us. And we know the killer. We
know all involved, the DIRTY DOZEN.
Yes Pfizer and Moderna did the unthinkable, they murdered
DAMAR HAMLIN, a Black African-American man as you watched, on national
television, for they, their actions, their product, the COVID gene injection
caused his heart to quit on him and he suddenly fell in cardiac arrest, in your
face. They stopped his heart for 10 minutes we were told, and then began the
cover up and lie on national television too and even sent out their television
talking head dangerous deceitful corrupted medical doctors and media to lie
about commotio cordis. They know the chance of this being commotio cordis is
slim. They know it happens in children mainly, they know generally using a ball
etc.
They know that this is more than likely ‘silent’ vaccine-induced
myocardial scarring (from prior COVID injection) that lead to a high-adrenaline
(catecholamine) arrhythmia episode causing cardiac arrest. They know that
the catecholamine surge due to exertion in the backdrop of a myocardial damaged
heart, can stress the heart and cause cardiac arrest.
They know! Fauci, Walensky, Bourla, Bancel, Ashish Jha,
Francis Collins, Baric, Hotez, Wen, Njoo, Tam etc. They know! They know this
will be repeated over and over! They know it already has been playing out! They
know what will happen to many young persons and infants and children due to the
COVID gene injection.
You want to shut me up for asking the right questions,
NEVER! The record is now in place. Criminal charges must be laid at the feet of
Pfizer and Moderna, along with CDC, NIH, FDA, Fauci, Birx, Walensky, Francis
Collins, Ashish Jha, Bourla, Bancel etc. Murder charges!
I say murder charges!
I am riding with real warriors in this who with me, decided
NO, enough is enough and we reacted with the right response and I mean myself,
Oskoui, McCullough, Berenson, Stock, Wolf, Mark Crispin Miller, Rogers, Kirsch
etc. We did not insert our heads into ours assess afraid, like some of the
freedom fighters who recoiled and stood back. Somehow when they saw the cardiac
arrest, they stapled their stones to their thighs and who had no staples, glued
theirs to their thighs. They lost the ‘warrior’ in them and put on some pink
‘woke’ pussy hats. But Oskoui and McCullough and Jeff Tucker said NO. I said
NO. Miller said NO. NO, we said NO, we know something is and was wrong and we
told them 2 years now this will happen and more of it will. We asked the
questions while many, shockingly in our movement, slinked away. Shrunk when we
needed them most. The hope is that they grow back the backbone we know they
have and stand up!
Warriors with balls of steel and I tip the hat to them! I
tip my hat to Tucker Carlson!
NFL players be warned, what you saw with DAMAR will
happen to many more of you. To our police, the best among us, our military, our
pilots. Our border agents. We told you so. Sadly, you did not listen. Aaron
Rodgers knew what he was saying. So was Novak. You should have understood.
Key documents in such a murder charge filing, based on my
prior substacks including Berenson’s and the combined statements of Alexander,
Stock, McCullough, and Oskoui:
Our official position (Alexander and Stock with McCullough
and Oskoui) and you are free now to use this and quote it:
“The most likely diagnosis from the little certainty we
have so far, is vaccine-induced myocardial scarring (from prior COVID
injection) that lead to a high-adrenaline arrhythmia episode causing cardiac
arrest. The chance of vaccine myocarditis scarring and subsequent
arrhythmic predisposition is much greater than the chance of Commotio Cordis
absent vaccine cardiac injury. Commotio Cordis is very rare in his age
range, non-projectile Commotio Cordis even rarer, vaccine myocardial scarring
is very common to them, the hit on the play was not a major chest blow, and the
Buffalo Bills have stated that they are 100% vaccinated. Had he suffered
onset of ventricular arrythmia at the time of chest impact it is unlikely he
could have finished a tackle, let alone gotten to his feet after the play.
The most likely diagnosis from the little certainty we have is vaccine-induced
myocardial scarring leading to high-adrenaline arrhythmia. But he only
reason for this uncertainty should be the player’s or his family’s desire for
privacy. The CDC, FDA or NIH can and should address this. Cardiac
MRI looking for late gadolinium enhancement, review of mis medical records
including vaccine records and response to those, or autopsy in the horrific
even he should pass, should be offered by the government for free, if not
because the most likely diagnosis is vaccine induced myocardial injury, then
for the sake of easing the population’s fears. The failure to do so will
be more telling than the results.”
[Blog Editor: BTW running spell check changed some
original content. From this point Dr. Paul Alexander delves less with the
anger over the death-mRNA-Jab and more into the science. I don’t know about
you, but the science for a lay person is like speaking Greek. If you are a science-person
willing to buck the control-narrative offered as science – READ
ON. Because of length and attention span limitations, you should find
the time to read the understandable science of Steve Kirsch and Toby Rogers:
I was
overhearing (yup okay, eavesdropping) a phone conversation between my
wife and her son (my stepson by marriage) – she had the speaker-phone
on. My pay-attention antennae arose when they began conversing about
COVID and the Jab. The son insisted he listened to truth based on facts and my
wife (his mother) only listened to misinformation and therefore had no facts.
Guess what – I am the primary source of my wife’s information, so my blood
began to boil.
I could tell
from the conversation the so-called truth spotted from my wife’s son sounded a
lot like the misinformation delivered to American Sheeple from the 3-letter
government agencies such as the CDC, FDA, NIH and so on. The primary liar being
current NIAID head Lord Fauci –
a proven greedy liar.
I have posted
over time reputed doctors and scientists who have had their reputations tarnished
for refuting the 3-letter agencies and Big Pharma’s Globalist control-the-people
line of faux-facts. [I ran a search on my SlantRight 2.0 Blog with
the words “Actual Science” and a number of posts come up refuting Globalist science:
READ
HERE. Feel free to do your search looking for vilified doctors and science
now propagandized as "misinformation" when in fact it is data with
different results from science brainwashers.]
ERGO, here is
some science the CONTROL-THE-PEOPLE Globalists will claim is misinformation in
the hope you will ignore actual science.
I begin with a
Jessica
Rose post (recommended by one of those pesky doctors resisting
faux-science – sorry I can’t recall which one but he was on Substack) about
how DNA can be altered via the mRNA Jab (vehemently denied by Globalist
science) complete with data attempted be hidden by Globalist Science and
includes something new for me – “self-amplifying RNA” (saRNA).
AND LAST, one
of my Wordpress subscriptions (Boudica2015)
alerted that the Boudica Rumble
Channel had picked up the Hibbeler Productions of their 2020
Documentary entitled, “The Plannedemic.” Boudica does not provide any
source info on the Rumble Channel, so I did a little digging. The Documentary
is in three parts and was- GASP!
– banned on Youtube. Here is the Hibbeler Productions
Youtube Channel. And here is the Hibbeler Productions webpage of assorted
videos available for minimal price purchase.
JRH
6/20/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
About half a year ago, I suppose, I virtually sat across from a Canadian
researcher who was developing a new technology called self-amplifying RNA
(saRNA). If you want, you can watch that interview here. My hosts
are lovely people. At the time, I found it difficult to listen to my
co-interviewee because a) I used to be her and b) I know the dangers associated
with what she is developing. It is my opinion that she did not.
I revisited this interview whilst writing this and it is good. How
frikkin’ diplomatic am I?
“Why do the best solutions and advances, get
thrown away into the worst possible hands?” Jello Biafra.
Jello
Biafra (nee: Eric Reed
Boucher) performing at the 2014 Fun Fun Fun Fest
So the claim is that this self amplifying messenger RNA is awesome
because you need to inject less of it. But here’s the thing: it encodes its own
replicase enzyme - it makes copies of the RNA (whatever it is) once inside the
cells. Does that sound problematic to you? To me, it does. And here’s why. If
the other genes in the mRNA encode destructive proteins (like the modified mRNA
of the SARS-nCoV-2 spike protein), then… for one, how will it ever be possible
to turn off these self-amplifying RNAs? Are the replicases self-limiting?
If you ask me, the people developing and promoting this technology are
concerned only about profit, ‘cost’ and initial dose. They claim that adverse
event occurrences are proportional to the initial dose of RNA.
Hmm. Anna claims in the interview that the menstrual cycle disruptions induced
by the COVID-19 mRNA injectable products are temporary, and can also be brought
on by viral infections. She also claimed that the vaccinated people won’t get
severe COVID-19 in the context of hospitalization. Really? I missed out on that
point in the interview. She was pretty sure that since most of the people in
Israel had been injected, that this would explains why the majority of COVID-19
hospitalizations were in the context of the injected. But then, if the shots
were meant to reduce severity, why would they ending up in the hospital?
On saRNA
So as we all know by now, the messenger RNA in the COVID-19
Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna products, is the mode of delivery of information
for the cells in our bodies to make lots and lots of modified spike proteins.
That’s what these folks are now calling ‘conventional’ mRNA.1 Well
now! That was fast. Now it’s a CONVENTION? Aaaaaaaaaaalrightttttttyyyyy
thennnn.
So do you see the highlighted bit in green? That’s the code for nsP1-4
genes that following in situ translation that form an RNA-dependent RNA
polymerase (RdRP) complex resulting in accumulation of antigen within the cell.
The nonstructural proteins 1, 2, 3, and 4 (nsP1-4) are essential for replicon
activity as they form the RdRP complex.2 The
‘conventional’ modified mRNA is non-replicative because it does not include an
RdRP (RdRPs these take pieces of RNA and make copies of it). These enzymes are
very specific to the RNA. The UTRs help to maintain this specificity.
Apparently, no human RdRP can do this for the conventional RNAs. The saRNAs do
replicate, however. And apparently, again, the RdRP that comes with it, is the
only one that will allow this to perpetuate. Chicken and an egg?
Here are a few sources of information about this technology.3456789
So this saRNA has been on the schedule the whole time. They didn’t even
anticipate the possibility that the ‘conventional’ mRNA would be a failure,
because, if it was, imagine how bad that would be for the schedule! And guess
what, it’s being trialed now.
What do you want to bet that those trial participants have NO IDEA that
they are being injected with self-amplifying RNA? This study is active with
‘estimated’ primary completion dateApril, 2023 (final data
collection date for primary outcome measure).
·BNT162c2 will
be administered using a Prime/Boost (P/B) regimen. The vaccine BNT162c2 will
also be administered using a Single dose (SD) regimen.
·Experimental:
BNT162c2 (P/B) - Part A 18-55 years of age
·Escalating
dose levels
·Intervention:
Biological: BNT162c2.
·The primary
endpoint is 21 days post injection.
·Actual
Enrollment (submitted: January 12, 2022): 512
1. That I
haven’t heard that the saRNAs are already being trialed and
2. That there
is no mention of self-amplifying mRNAs in the clinical trial data sheet. There
is, however, a very long exclusion criteria list and an informed consent clause
as part of it.
Inclusion criteria: Have given informed consent by
signing the informed consent form (ICF) before initiation of any trial-specific
procedures.
What do you want to bet that this document that required signing said
nothing of self-amplifying RNAs?
I put this together today when I opened up the FOIA document attached at
the top of this article. I had received an email on June 9th, 2022 (10 days
ago) that was addressed to myself and Robert Malone as to what the ‘BNT162c2’
was. I had told the addresser that I hadn’t heard of it before and Robert
pointed us both to the clinical trial with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04380701.
But, I still didn’t know what it was. Maybe it had a different LNP? Nope.
It’s a
completely different type of technology. Again.
What’s the encoded antigen? We’re not going to tell you! But we are going
to insist that you get injected with it. Or, no soup for you.
Even though there are peer-reviewed studies on this technology, I cannot
stress this point enough: WE NEED LONG TERM DATA WHEN IT COMES TO NEW TECH. Not
21 days. Not 365 days. We need years. We are NOT in an emergency and therefore,
we have the time to explore the safety and efficacy of saRNA technology
carefully and properly. Like we should have been doing the whole time with our
now magically ‘conventional’ mRNA tech.
Sorry, I have to include this screenshot. This is just too precious. It’s
so safe. Just inject me now. Wait, I can’t see! Everything turned black! Kind
of like the safety data redaction for the product. (Sorry for the very dark humor.
Sorry. I did it again.)
Oh and they mention in section 7.2 Posology and method of administration,
that ‘the vaccine should not be injected into areas where there may be a major
nerve trunk’. Ok. Good to know.
And this literally made me LAUGH OUT LOUD. Look at this.
7.11.2 Non-clinical findings of note
All tested non-clinical and clinical vaccine
candidates were immunogenic to highly immunogenic in non-clinical models. The
available data demonstrate that BNT162b1, BNT162b2, BNT162b3, and BNT162c2 are
capable of inducing robust immune responses in mice, (except for BNT162c2)
rats and NHPs.
Why would they include BNT162c2 in this list if it’s not in the list?
So when you order a cheeseburger, because you love cheese, and it comes
without cheese on it and you complain, they yell at you that ‘cheeseburger’ is
just a word and had nothing to do with a burger having cheese on it, what are
you to do? Same logic, yeah?
If we have not learned yet that we need to be cautious with gene-based
therapies, then, you know what? I just don’t know what to say.
1
Bloom, K., van den Berg, F. & Arbuthnot, P. Self-amplifying RNA vaccines
for infectious diseases. Gene Ther28, 117–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-020-00204-y.
2
Kääriäinen L, Ahola T. Functions of alphavirus nonstructural proteins in RNA
replication. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2002;71:187–222.
3
Maruggi, G., Ulmer, J. B., Rappuoli, R., & Yu, D. (2021). Self-amplifying
mRNA-Based Vaccine Technology and Its Mode of Action. Current topics in
microbiology and immunology, 10.1007/82_2021_233. Advance online
publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2021_233.
4
Brito, L. A., Kommareddy, S., Maione, D., Uematsu, Y., Giovani, C., Berlanda
Scorza, F., Otten, G. R., Yu, D., Mandl, C. W., Mason, P. W., Dormitzer, P. R.,
Ulmer, J. B., & Geall, A. J. (2015). Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines. Advances
in genetics, 89, 179–233. https://doi.org/10.1016.
5
Geall, A. J., Verma, A., Otten, G. R., Shaw, C. A., Hekele, A., Banerjee, K.,
Cu, Y., Beard, C. W., Brito, L. A., Krucker, T., O'Hagan, D. T., Singh, M.,
Mason, P. W., Valiante, N. M., Dormitzer, P. R., Barnett, S. W., Rappuoli, R.,
Ulmer, J. B., & Mandl, C. W. (2012). Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying
RNA vaccines.
6
McKay, P. F., Hu, K., Blakney,
A. K., Samnuan, K., Brown, J. C., Penn, R., Zhou, J., Bouton, C. R., Rogers,
P., Polra, K., Lin, P., Barbosa, C., Tam, Y. K., Barclay, W. S., &
Shattock, R. J. (2020). Self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle
vaccine candidate induces high neutralizing antibody titers in mice. Nature
communications, 11(1), 3523. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17409-9.
(Notice the conflicts here.)
7
Ballesteros-Briones, M. C., Silva-Pilipich, N., Herrador-Cañete, G., Vanrell,
L., & Smerdou, C. (2020). A new generation of vaccines based on alphavirus
self-amplifying RNA. Current opinion in virology, 44,
145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.08.003.
8Blakney, A. K., McKay, P. F.,
Hu, K., Samnuan, K., Jain, N., Brown, A., Thomas, A., Rogers, P., Polra, K.,
Sallah, H., Yeow, J., Zhu, Y., Stevens, M. M., Geall, A., & Shattock, R. J.
(2021). Polymeric and lipid nanoparticles for delivery of self-amplifying RNA
vaccines. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the
Controlled Release Society, 338, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.029.
(Notice the conflicts here.)
9
Lundstrom K. (2020). Self-Amplifying RNA Viruses as RNA Vaccines. International
journal of molecular sciences, 21(14), 5130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145130.
A Swedish
study has demonstrated and confirmed that the mRNA in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid
injections infiltrates cells and transcribes its message onto human DNA within
6 hours, altering our own DNA.
The
findings come after a previous study published in October 2021 from
Sweden found the spike protein enters our cells nuclei and impairs the
mechanism cells have to repair damaged DNA.
The
Highwire made an
easy-to-understand video explaining the previous study, including graphics, and
so it is a good starting point to help understand the significance of the
latest study from Sweden.
Preclinical animal studies of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid mRNA injection
(BNT162b2) showed reversible effects on the livers of rats including: enlarged
liver, vacuolation and increased enzyme levels (γGT, AST, ALP).Inthe
assessment report on BNT162b2 provided to EMA by
Pfizer, studies in rats demonstrated that the contents do not stay at the
injection site and a relatively large proportion (up to 18%) of the total
“vaccine” dose ends up in the liver.
Another study in May 2021 by MIT
scientists showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed
and integrated into the genome of human cells and expressed as chimeric
transcripts. Although no one from corporate media or corporate science seemed
to ask at the time, the findings of this study give rise to the question of
whether this same reverse transcription may also occur with RNA in Covid
injections.
ABC 10 News reported on the MIT study shortly after it was
published. [Blog Editor: Note Propaganda ABC implies
COVID changed DNA not the mRNA Jab, none of which lines up with the reporting.]
Pictures speak a thousand words and so rather than try to write an
explanation we found a video which introduces the mechanism of reverse
transcription of HIV, a retrovirus. It may be a little dated and overly
simplistic but it illustrates how HIV infects a cell and replicates itself
using reverse transcriptase and the host’s cellular machinery.
“In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver
cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the study authors wrote.
The study found that the mRNA injection is able to enter the human liver
cell line Huh7 and that the injections’ mRNA is reverse transcribed into DNA as
fast as six hours after the cells were exposed to it.
“A possible mechanism for reverse transcription is through endogenous
[intracellular] reverse transcriptase LINE-1, and the nucleus protein
distribution of LINE-1 is elevated by BNT162b2,” the study authors wrote.
“Huh cells are ‘immortal’ liver tumour cells and grow ad-infinitum if you
give them love,” Jessica
Rose explained, “LINE-1 is a reverse transcriptase that we carry
and comprises ~17% of our genome!”
“Our study shows that [Pfizer’s mRNA injection] … can be reverse
transcribed to DNA … and this may give rise to the concern if
[injection]-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the
integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side
effects.”
In the video below, Dr. Mobeen Syed, host of Dr. Been, explains
this study in layman’s terms. We have embedded the video to begin at timestamp
8:17 where he begins to explain, over the next 9 mins, reverse transcription,
Huh7 cells, LINE-1 gene expression, LINE-1 protein and what this all means.**
The paper concludes: “Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect
of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence
on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse
transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.”
Referring to the study Dr.
Peter McCullough tweeted: “Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, confirms
one of our worst fears. The exogenous [extracellular] genetic material coding
for the dangerous Spike Protein is reverse transcribed into the human genome;
possible long-term constitutive expression / synthesis of disease-promoting /
lethal Spike.”
Was This
the Plan All Along?
To answer the question whether this has been planned, below is a
selection of excerpts from infamous individuals regarding gene editing, in
their own words. No further comment is required, these excerpts speak for
themselves, you decide.
In an interview with Charlie Rose, Klaus Schwab said: “You see the
difference of this fourth industrial revolution is it doesn’t change what you
are doing, it changes you. If you take genetic editing, just as an example,
it’s you who are changing. And of course, this has a big impact on your
identity.”
Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, stated, “In every cell
there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the
critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really
the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that
determines what the cell will do. So, we think about it as an operating system.
…. So, if you could actually change that, … if you could introduce a line of
code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications
for everything, from the flu to cancer.”
During an interview
with Anthony Fauci on 30 April 2020, Bill Gates said he was
particularly excited about pursuing a new approach called ‘RNA vaccine’. Gates
explained, “Unlike a flu shot, which contains fragments of the influenza virus
so your immune system can learn to attack them, an RNA vaccine gives your body
the genetic code needed to produce viral fragments on its own.”
Around this time Gates made a promotional video for his “RNA vaccines.”
Forbes published an article on 29 November 2021 from Steven Salzberg
titled, “Yes, The Vaccine Changes Your DNA. A Tiny Bit. That’s A Good Thing.”
And later retitled the article to “Covid Vaccines Don’t Alter Your
DNA – They Help Choose Cells to Strengthen Your Immune Response”.
The author changed the headline to emphasise that the vaccines “don’t
alter your DNA” without changing any of the article’s content.
%202.jpg)
