DONATE

Showing posts with label Tom Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Smith. Show all posts

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Tom Smith Comment on Kryzhanovsky – ‘The Professional’ Chapter 4

Mikhail Kryzhanovsky & BHO campaign foto

Posted November 6, 2011

This is part of the ongoing chapters sent by Tom Smith in comment form to SlantRight.com of Mikhail Kryzhanovsky’s manual – The Professional - for Presidents to attain power, remain in power and deal with power. Since I began editing and posting the chapters that Tom Smith sent me I have ran into a website that is doing the same thing and apparently has received directly content from Kryzhanovsky. That website is Pooler-Georgia-Homepage. Interestingly PGH is not a conspiracy theory or a political blog as much as it is an information website for Pooler, GA. PGH begins with The Professional introduction which includes a disclaimer from PGH. Since the content is from Kryzhanovsky at PGH it is probably closer to its original form than what I am editing from the Tom Smith comment version sent to me. Frankly I am reading the Tom Smith version as I am editing it. I have no idea how many actual chapters there are in The Professional. The only real reason for posting Kryzhanovsky’s manual is to honor my commitment to fairness in comments sent to the SlantRight.com website. From what I have read about Mikhail Kryzhanovsky he is a bit too fantastic to believe; however his focus currently seems to be anti-Obama. That works for me!

The PGH website gives two links to Kryzhanovsky websites if you believe his stuff:



Here are the three chapters I have posted to date:





JRH 11/6/11
************************
Chapter 4. The US Congress Management

The White House, not Congress, represents the nation. You are the leader and you set the legislative agenda. They can’t start business until you give them State of the Union Address and a budget message. That’s your program - and theirs. Start your first term with a big legislative victory. The US Constitution says nothing on how you manage the Congress so feel free to use the advice in these pages.

The Congress has five main checks over the President’s power:

1. to override a veto

2. to approve your appointees to federal jobs

3. to approve treaties

4. impeachment

5. to stop funding executive department programs

Seniority (the length of continuous service on the record of a member of Congress or Senate) is the single most important factor in determining:

- who becomes Speaker of the House or President pro tempore of the Senate

- who is influential in floor debates

- who has an easier time getting his legislative measures adopted on the floor of Congress

Never mind about Representatives (especially when it comes to foreign affairs and national security) — they understand very little and can do practically nothing due to their two-year term. Your problem is the Senate (though you have to be involved in Congressional elections every two years, too.) Yes, the Senate is a problem because it shares executive powers with the President (confirmation of appointments and approval of treaty ratification). And if it comes to impeachment, the final decision is the Senate’s.

The House originates the most important thing in the United States — tax legislation, but the Senate can amend any bill and the trick is — they do this toward the end of the session. And the worst problem on Capitol Hill is balancing the budget.

What you don't know about them

1. A Congressional session is nothing else but a waste of federal time and money — you don’t need debates because Congressional staffers can do all the technical work and they can negotiate between themselves and balance positions. Senators and Congressmen don’t even have to come to Washington — they can vote from their local offices. So these people can spend their time helping thousands of constituents, most of whom never saw their Senator alive.

2. The President is dependent on Congressional cooperation to carry out the executive responsibilities of the Office because Congress has to authorize government programs, establish administrative agencies to implement the problems and funds to finance them.

3. It’s important if President belongs to the party with a majority in the House and Senate. But if your party loses the majority in Congress, you have to work out new political strategy yourself. And you know what? Go to the polls right away and ask voters why they supported the other party. What happened?

4. President’s prestige (popular support or political capital) affects Congressional response to his politics.

5. Influence in Congress is courted only for long periods of service; a Senator with 30 years in office (like Edward Kennedy) has considerably more power than a Senator in his first or second term. This causes the electorate to increasingly favor incumbents, as dislodging one’s Congressman or Senator after 30 years, even if the candidate or his party have become unpopular, can be viewed as hurting one’s district financially. It is often thought that a freshman would be less able to bring home federal money for his state or district.

6. For most Senators, the Senate is a platform for Presidential election campaign. Senators who openly express presidential ambitions are better able to gain media exposure and to establish careers as spokespersons for large national constituencies.

7. The first act of a newly elected Representative is to maneuver for election to the Senate. Why? First, they enjoy their position, power and money for six years non-stop. Second, there are only a hundred Senators and the publicity is much, much greater. But…Representatives have a much better chance to be re-elected.

8. Congress rejects two thirds of President’s proposals.

9. Senators are always looking for a BBD (bigger, better deal) and often shift from one committee to another (a good choice is those dealing with taxes, budget, energy, commerce).

10. Bills to benefit big business move smoothly. (Congress doesn’t like the poor — they don’t contribute; sorry). To gain majority support for big business legislation members have a special trick — log rolling, when factions combine efforts.

11. Senators don’t depend on the people — they depend on the media.

12. If a certain Senator is blocking the President’s proposal, appointment or plan, that means he wants to get the President’s attention.

13. When Senators want to bury issues without resolving them, they create committees.

14. The Senate is a relatively small structure and personal relations between Senators are extremely important.

15. Senators have no incentive to study the details of most pieces of legislation and their decision is simplified by quickly checking how key colleagues have voted or intend to vote.

16.To have power a Senator has to object: much of the Senate work is done by unanimous consent and if you object you’ll be approached for sure by some influential people including other Senators, Secretaries, President’s aides or the President himself. They’ll try to press, blackmail or buy you — and that means you’ve got a piece of the power pie.

17. Senators avoid responsibility and their legitimate functions and roles, especially in economic policy.

18. Congress doesn’t like it when any government agency grows, but these people love the military because military contracts are very lucrative for Congressional districts.

19. Senior Senators teach “newcomers” to vote against any reform which is a threat to their stability.

20. A Senator has real influence on legislation only if he has professional staff in charge of the projects.

21. Senators are afraid to vote against a defense budget increase because then they may be accused of a lack of patriotism (the Pentagon gives jobs in their states too).

22. Republicans and Democrats are not really enemies, here, though both sides are always looking for a “traitor” or “insider” in the other camp.

23. You must have “insiders” in the Senate yourself, because the other party could prepare secretly and then launch officially some investigation against you or the members of your Administration.

24. A legislator does exactly what his voters want him to do — stealing federal money from other states and districts, because for him the most important thing is numbers — polls in his state showing how many people approve his activity. His donors watch these numbers too and estimate their investment and the necessity to support re-election.

25. Every member of Congress has a so-called “split personality” — a “Hill style” while working on Capitol Hill and a “home style” while back in the state or district with the voters.

26. A Senator makes a decision only after thinking about what it means in terms of the re-election money that will come to him or to his opponents. His voting decisions depend on his party membership, constituency pressures, state and regional loyalty ideology, interest groups’ influence. His stubbornness comes from the fact that he doesn’t want to be seen by his constituents as a “rubber stamp” for President’s decisions, especially when the bill in question benefits a Senator’s state. (And the hidden problem is — you want to move fast, especially during the first year while your personal popularity is high — but for the Congress speed is not important).

27. Sooner or later every member of Congress starts playing the “pork barrel” game. It’s nothing else but a diversion of federal funds to projects and places not out of national need but to enhance a member’s chances of re-election in his district (military projects, federal buildings, highways construction projects). So be ready for a “Christmas gift” when these fellows add pork barrel amendments to appropriations bills you are about to sign. They often wait until late in each session to pass critical spending bills, which narrows your range of possible responses because a veto may not be feasible if Congress has adjourned and the funds needed to run the federal government are contained in the legislation.

28. In Congress a small percentage of bills (about 500 out of 10,000) actually become law because many bills are introduced merely to get favorable press. The strategy is especially effective if the legislation is “tied” to the headlines of the day (mass murders, natural disasters, ethnic riots etc.).

29. In the Senate it’s easier for a minority to block the bill than for a majority to pass it: a 60-vote majority is needed to force a final vote on the bill, while only 41 votes are needed to continue debate and delay a vote.

30. The minority can hold the majority responsible as the party in power for whatever legislation does or does not emerge from the Senate. But both parties prefer to be the party in power in the Senate - all Senate legislation begins in the committees, whose membership and chairmanship are controlled by the party in power. Besides, each chairman has power in terms of controlling the committee budgets and deciding which hearings will be held and which legislation he will allow to be released to the Senate floor for a vote. He can also “lock up the bill” in committee until it dies. Perfect!

How to Control Congress

The President can propose legislation, but Congress is not required to pass any of the administration’s bills. But you know already that Senators and Representatives need re-election more than anything else. So you can go with indirect influence through appeals to the public; this is a confrontation and direct challenge to Congressional authority. You can also enlist the support of interest groups or direct influence through favors and personal involvement in the legislative process. (Get public support for a proposal before it’s discussed with the Congress.) And don’t hesitate to start a national debate — you have enough media attention for that. You also have an independent tool, presidential power in the form of an executive order.

You can give favors directly to members of Congress or to influential people in their constituency, or the favor may be of benefit to the constituency itself:

- appointments with the President and other high-ranking officials

- federal grants to recipients in the constituency, government contracts with local companies, the deposit of federal funds in banks, grants to local government and educational institutions

- support of projects (military installations, research and administrative facilities, public works such as buildings, dams and navigational improvements to rivers and harbors, etc.)

- recommendations for the US district court judges, attorneys, marshals, etc.

- campaign assistance (cash contributions from the party’s national committee invitations to bill-signing ceremonies, White House parties or to accompany President on trips

- bargaining and arm-twisting (pressure and threats to lose the projects).

Tools

1. The Congressional Relations Office. Used for:

- intense lobbying to form Congressional coalitions if the opposition controls one or both houses

- intelligence gathering (of policy preferences — centralized headcounts reveal the voting intentions on a particular bill and constituency concerns of individual members)

- representation - creating “inner coalitions”

- coordination of executive branch legislative activity (monitoring and tracking bills, controlling departments’ staff appointments, collaborating with departments’ liaison offices)

Attention! Senators and Congressmen have to trust your people, who must keep their mouths shut, otherwise there will be no business. Anyway, watch these people — a Senator can call one of your assistants and if they hear “no,” he will try to reach somebody else until he gets “Yes, the President will see you.” Don’t let this happen — if it’s “no,” it has to be everybody’s “no.” There has to be no difference between personal views of your adviser and your official views.

2. Congressional Relations personnel of various executive Departments are a conduit. Talk to the Secretaries and explain to them that they have to give the Director of Congressional Relations their best people.

3. The White House interest groups liaison staff (office of public liaison)

4. Veto. Threatened with a veto, Senators often seek compromise. Congress has its ways to undermine your vetoes or threats of vetoes. Because you can’t veto parts of a bill, they load up major legislation with amendments on a completely different subject (“riders”) that they know the President must accept. (Presidents who vetoed the most bills: Franklin Roosevelt - 635, Harry Truman - 250, Dwight Eisenhower - 181, Ronald Reagan - 78, Gerald Ford - 66).

5. Executive agreement. It permits the President to enter into open or secret agreements with a foreign government without any advice or consent of the Senate.

There are two categories of executive agreements:

а) presidential agreements made solely on the basis of the constitutional authority of the President and under his sole power to faithfully execute the laws (or under his diplomatic or Commander-in-Chief powers).

President needs to report secret agreement to the Foreign Relations Committees of the two houses no later than 60 days after such agreement has entered into force. Congress has no authority to disapprove it.

b) congressional-executive agreements, which cover all international agreements entered into under the combined authority of the President and Congress.

Finally, this is what you can do with a bill:

- sign the bill (the bill becomes a law)

- do nothing (the bill becomes a law in ten days)

- veto the bill (the bill does not become a law)

- pocket veto the bill (hold the bill until Congress is no longer in session, and the bill does not become a law)

Friday, November 4, 2011

Tom Smith Comment on Kryzhanovsky– ‘The Professional’ Chapter 3

Kryzhanovsky-Obama President

This is the Chapter 3 installment sent by Tom Smith of Mikhail Kryzhanovsky’s truly unbelievable book about espionage exploits in this case the how to manual for an American President to get elected and remain in Office.



JRH 11/4/11
***************************
Tom Smith Comment on Kryzhanovsky– ‘The Professional’ Chapter 3

Chapter 3 Domestic Policy Golden rules

You can’t separate domestic and foreign policies because they are married to the same ugly guy - the budget deficit. Domestic policy rests on three legs: education, health and environment.

Americans will never support reduced funding for education, Social Security and Medicare (Medicaid) cuts and weakened environmental-protection laws. But I strongly advise you

- don’t bother trying to emulate Europe and the British Commonwealth by providing health care for all

- the privately insured middle class (your voting majority) won’t stand for it.

If you don’t believe me, go to the polls. Now, are you a challenger in politics? If “yes,” strengthen your political positions in Washington, DC first, then start some reforms. Before you start a reform you have to win the information war with your opponents and get public support. A reform is always a venture; the process may start taking on momentum and you won’t be able to stop it. You had better continue old reforms using a new tactic because new reforms bring new problems, new enemies and new mistakes, and big economic mistakes bring you an economic crises.

Dealing with big business.

1. Big organized money moves big political machines, big political machines move big lobbies, big lobbies move the President.

2. The President is an investment.

3. A group that rules the economy rules the White House.

4. A new political course comes not with a new President, but a change of big business’ global financial interests.

5. Follow 3 "golden rules":

 - protect big investments

- help to promote

- don’t interfere.

6. If the government doesn’t meet the needs of big business, it forms a new one of its own (something like a President’s Council). This usually happens when the President can’t provide financial stability and super-profits. Besides, big business has much more important foreign connections than the government.

7. Big business is:

a) money

b) political and economic control

8. Any political action gets an economic (big business) reaction.

In terms of partisan politics, Republicans are considered to be more sympathetic to big business interests while traditionally Democrats get electoral and financial support from organized labor. Forget about antitrust policy, business has become more global and efforts to enforce antitrust policies have proven deficient and are threats to national security.

The Economy Economic strategy is as important as national security. Appoint bright, educated and experienced people to the Cabinet and the Federal Reserve Board, who advise you on important economic decisions. Press foreign governments on trade and currency issues. Watch the markets 24/7. Balance the budget (half goes to national defense - if there’s no war there are no jobs in America - 35% of US business works for Pentagon. In general, the key word in domestic policy is accomplishment — budget balanced, taxes cut, jobs created. Use your budget power to the full extent because people usually hold you, not Congress, accountable for economic downturns.

Whether you win or lose your second term in the Oval Office largely depends on your budget actions.

Managing the Economy

1. Regulate spending, taxation, monetary policy and foreign trade which it has to be under strict political control - you have the right to propose legislation and veto any legislation you think incorrect. Keep in mind that Americans always insist on reducing government spending on foreign aid and space exploration, and they naturally hate any rise in taxes.

2. State and local governments, both through national associations like the US Conference of Mayors and Congress Members, always press the government to get more federal funds even at the expense of inflationary budget deficits.

3. Keep unemployment low and prices stable - these two factors are politically dangerous and failure here can bring a free-fall in approval ratings.

4. Take credit for economic growth, price stability and low unemployment even if you have nothing to do with it. Still have problems? Try international initiatives.

There are four inevitable factors that will limit your control over the economy:

1) You must share power with Congress - you can’t levy taxes or appropriate money all by yourself;

2) The theoretical nature of the science of economics - no single economic theory has ever explained the behavior of the economy in the future;

3) The imprecision of economic information. Economic statistics and indicators do not measure the immediate conditions of the economy, but rather the conditions that prevailed between one and three months ago, depending on the particular economic statistics. Consequently, if you take action on the basis of incoming economic information you may be reacting to a problem that no longer exists or that is much worse than believed.

4) There are forces outside the reach of the federal government, like international factors (oil prices and foreign trade policies), state and local governments economic decisions and mistakes, big business decisions that affect employment, inflation, the trade deficit and public opinion — which is always against cutting social programs.

Budget Deficit A large budget deficit is a headache and has extremely negative effects on the economy:

1. It limits the government’s flexibility to fight a possible recession; that requires tax cuts and deficit spending, which would exacerbate the debt problem. Since tax revenues fall during a recession and unemployment insurance and welfare payments rise, the budget would be under further strain precisely when deficit spending would be needed to pull the economy up.

2. It reduces the amount of funds available for achieving the nation’s social and defense goals, because interest must be paid on the national debt.

3. It can threaten the economy by “crowding out” corporate and private borrowers from the credit market. Because the government must borrow heavily to finance its deficit, it competes with business and individuals to borrow funds. The increased competition forces interest rates higher, causing loans (including mortgages) to become more expensive. As a result, business can afford to purchase less plant and equipment to expand and modernize their operations and fewer consumers can afford to finance purchases of expensive items, such as houses and cars. The resulting reduction in demand threatens economic growth.

4. The US budget deficit has become so large that domestic savings no longer can provide enough capital to service the debt. Consequently, the government must borrow from foreign sources to make up the difference. This makes us dependent on foreign investors and raises the possibility of a “stabilization crisis,” which can occur if foreign investors lose confidence in the dollar and liquidate their US investments. Such a crisis could cause the dollar to plummet and interest and inflation to rapidly accelerate.

Crisis

Crisis means that your government as a system is exhausted and it’s unable to rule the nation and resources effectively in an extreme situation, including economic, natural catastrophes and war. A crisis has three stages — before the crisis, when the first signs appear; crisis development until culmination; catastrophe followed by impeachment.

A crisis could be “programmed” at the very beginning of your term (mistakes in political and economic courses, inexperienced personnel, faulty planning) or it can appear later (too many mistakes, change of political environment, shifts in the economic or international situation). Crisis management includes pre-crisis management and handling of the situation. You must be ready not only for a government crisis but also for sudden military attack, mass riots and natural disasters.

International trade is an important component of national security. Our “friends” (NATO members, Saudi Arabia and Japan) favor a dollar (that is neither overvalued nor undervalued) and a healthy US economy with relatively full employment and low inflation rate. If the dollar is weak, the value of much of their international currency reserves declines and their goods are less competitive in the US market. If the dollar is too strong, their investment capital migrates to the US and the high competitiveness of their products in the US market threatens to provoke calls for trade restrictions. If unemployment in the US rises, the major market for their goods declines. If interest rates are higher in the US than in Europe or Japan, investment capital moves to our country. Consequently, foreign governments press the United States to keep the exchange value of the dollar from fluctuating widely and to hold interest rates steady.

Domestic Propaganda and Mind Control Propaganda Technology

You need 24/7 effective propaganda to get non-stop public support of your policy — your war for public support doesn’t stop the day you enter the White House — it may stop the day you leave the White House. If your polls go below 40%, the United States effectively has no President.

Use the following propaganda tools:

- general (abstract) information on big problem

- information dosage (the less people know — the easier you convince them)

- misinformation (full or partial) presented as news, sensations, rumors

 - disorientation - one bit of information contradicts another one

- provocation - information “pushes” people (before you start war)

- information over-dosage - too much information (and people lose interest)

- exaggeration of enemy’s negative sides and promotion of scary data

- distraction of nation’s attention from news that is bad (for you) by publishing sensations and (political) scandals - stereotype manipulation (“nuclear threat,” “international terror,” etc.

- “shuffle”

- all news and facts match President’s political course

- “cocktail” - mix of true and false information

-“facts transportation” from abroad (you buy a foreign reporter and he’s publishing positive information on your politics; then you spread the information through American media)

Remember the principles of mass psychology: people don’t believe the government - they believe the market and the stock exchange; people need statements, not analysis. Mind Control Every day in 2004 we watched the Homeland Security Department “terror alert colors” and very often the threat was “high” or “very high.”

With all my 30 years espionage experience I couldn’t understand why they were telling the nation about the threat and producing the multicolor picture on TV. Why? What can ordinary Americans do about that? What happened next made the situation absolutely clear for me and posed one more question for the nation: right after President Bush was re-elected the colors disappeared - why? Again, what happened? Is there no more “terror threat” to America? There is. But there’s mind control, too. Mind control, which I call mind manipulation or MM, is used to program the “right political behavior” of the nation or “indifferent behavior,” if necessary, without people’s knowing or understanding the procedure. We are talking here about total illegal social control.

Principles of Mind Manipulation

1) It’s not enough if every single citizen, and the nation as a whole, thinks and behaves your way - it’s much better if they want to behave your way and feel comfortable, and are absolutely sure it’s their own choice and, finally, they become your active supporters.

2) If you want to control the nation and program peoples’ thoughts, you have to control knowledge (information, culture and communication).

3) The political imagination (belief) of the nation has to move in the right direction and has to be accepted as the most comfortable and most acceptable way of political activity: nobody is thinking, nobody is criticizing the President, nobody is making comparisons and drawing conclusions. Everybody believes the American President and hates his enemies.


4) Don’t waste time fighting foreign ideology, take care of ordinary Americans.

5) There is no difference between commercial and political advertising, and MM.

Technology of Mind Manipulation

1) Create a steadfast American collective will-power: “We want to live forever in the America we live in now” - through the media.

2) Don’t ask people to change their views and beliefs - they have only to change the object of their aggression - “Now we understand who is to be blamed for the problems! (the previous President, political opponents). “Now we understand where the problem lies!”(economic cycles, etc.).

3) Get people accustomed to accept facts but believe only in the “right” commentaries - any common sense has to be “switched off.” This way you create “mass artificial schizophrenia” — people lose the ability (and desire) to connect statements and facts (notions) and just believe. Besides, by extreme exaggeration of the enemy’s negative qualities you can install step by step the national schizophrenic fear and people have to accept you, the US President, as a savior. Plus, no matter what, repeat your major statements until people start accepting them without thinking.

4) Divide the nation into “good Americans”(patriots) and “bad Americans”(the “minority). Then make it clear that it’s much better and more comfortable to be “good” than “bad.” “We aren’t watching good Americans who support the President. The surveillance is for bad Americans and we make their lives and careers uncomfortable. We have to do that because enemies of America may be using them.” This method is called artificial social selection and its ultimate goal is a total regulation and standardization of the nation.

5) For successful MM, use the combined efforts of popular American writers, TV and radio anchors, talented publicists and columnists, business and show business celebrities, politicians. Thus, step by step you create the “industry of correct political behavior and correct American thinking.”

6) Use a combination: statement + image. It reduces the effort needed to understand your message and makes people comfortable with you.

7) Shift all popular TV shows to prime time - Americans don’t have to think about politics after they come home.

8) Keep terrorists in Guantanamo Bay forever - Americans have to see the threat every day.