John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© May 11, 2022
There is some news that has been transpiring for quite a
while that the Globalist Dem-Marxist MSM mouthpieces have failed to report to
Americans. NAMELY THIS: The World Health Organization (WHO) has been maneuvering
nations across the globe to give up national sovereignty to WHO global
governance in the name managing diseasing regardless of National laws in
Representative governments.
EVEN MORE HORRIFIC to American Sovereignty, the FRAUDULENTLY
elected Biden who seized power in the 2020 Election Coup is promoting WHO global
governance!
Judi McLeod of the Canada
Free Press and Dr.
Joseph Mercola examine the details of this SNEAKY-stealth path to
ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT rendering our already decimated U.S. Constitution even
more worthless to protect Individual Liberty/
[The Mercola post uses a Corbett Report that is lengthy
because it includes actual public venue testimony under the management of the
WHO. You might want to read Mercola first, then watch the video.]
JRH 5/11/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 -
$10 - $25 - $50 - $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
Please
Support SlantRight 2.0
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
*****************************
Warning: American Sovereignty About To Be Swallowed Whole
By U.N’s World Health Organization
The continent of North America is headed toward a One
World Wasteland, killing off all chances of the survival of the West
Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO
Director or Dictator
By Judi McLeod
May 10, 2022
Canada
Free Press
Take one last longing look at the
America we love because the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO) is about to
swallow its sovereignty whole—on a deadline looming as soon as May 22.
You won’t be hearing about it from a gossip-filled duped
mainstream or social media. There will be no warning from Barack Obama
mouthpiece, President Joe Biden.
Former Congress rep Michele Bachmann calls the coming May 22
WHO vote: “The biggest global power grab that we have seen in our lifetimes.”
Michele Bachmann: WHO
Vote Threatens U.S. Sovereignty
That’s what Bachmann told
Steve Bannon about the upcoming vote in Geneva over the Biden administration’s
amendments that would cede US sovereignty to the WHO over national healthcare
decisions.
Rumble VIDEO: Michele
Bachmann: WHO Vote Threatens U.S. Sovereignty
[Posted by Bannons War Room
Published May 9, 2022]
While caught up in a spider web of orchestrated diversions,
the sovereignty of some 193 UN captured nations—including America—is at
stake.
The only source that can stop it are We the
People whose country is about to have its sovereignty swept away:
“There’s an international law up
for final approval later this month that removes our bodily autonomy rights,
and rights due Americans pertaining to freedom, laws, and sovereignty and,
instead, puts the decision making power and actual control in the hands of the
WHO and the people who did this latest escapade in medical profiteering. The
date it’s to be finished is May 22nd and it will be finalized unless enough
people rally against it,” CFP reader Larry Holm warns patriots today.
“Getting word out is vital, and
several good ways to rally against it including sending
a pre-written letter to state reps.
“I’m seeing the warnings from
lots of doctors and lawyers who hate the lies and tyranny we’ve already been
under and that you help expose. Hope you can help on this message too.”
‘Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO’
“Please take seriously the severity of this
existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your
power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and
to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our national
sovereignty and freedom. (America
Out Loud, May 4, 2022)
“On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate
control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty,
will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing
legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).
“This threat is contained in new
amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by
the Biden administration, that are scheduled as “Provisional agenda item
16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.1
“These amendments will empower
WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation
and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The
Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely
on his personal opinion or consideration that there
is a potential or possible threat to other nations.
“If passed, the Biden
Administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their
intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the
United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations,
all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population.2
“These regulations are a
“binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3
U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.
How It Became Official
“On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials
from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these
extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into
the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of
possible concern to other nations.4 The U.S. amendments cross out a critical
existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to
obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is
allegedly occurring…”5 By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all
the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to
declare health emergencies at will. (America
Out Loud)
WHO’s Sweeping New Powers
§
The sweeping new powers will be invested in
the Director-General of WHO to act on his own.
The Director-General is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus,
commonly known as Tedros. Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of
WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from
Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party. Despite the fact that his
role as the cover-up apologist for the Chinese Communists at the onset of COVID-19,
this “dear friend of Anthony Fauci” was re-elected without opposition in 2022
to a second five-year term.11 His original election in 2017, followed by his
re-election without opposition in 2022, is an ominous display of Chinese
Communist influence over WHO,12 which makes further empowering the U.N. agency
extremely dangerous.
The World Health Organization is run by a terrorist
The head of the World Health Organization was a member of a
violent revolutionary communist party in Ethiopia: Tigray People’s Liberation
Front. The Department of Homeland Security clearly states:
“The TPLF qualifies as a Tier
III terrorist organization… on the basis of its violent activities…”
Source: (Stop
World Control)
Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus circled red
§
Under the new regulations, WHO will not be
required to consult with the identified nation beforehand to “verify” the event
before taking action. This requirement is stricken by the U.S. amendments
(Article 9.1). The amendments require a response in 24 hours from the
identified nation, or WHO will identify it as “rejection” and act independently
(Article 10.3). If the identified nation “does not accept the offer of
collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall ... immediately share with the other
State Parties the information available to it…” (Article 10.4).
§
Indicating the breadth of WHO’s scope of power,
the agency will be given the right to involve multiple other U.N. agencies,
including those related to food and agriculture, animal health, environmental
programs, “or other relevant entities” (Article 6.1). This, too will not
require the permission of the identified nation. The targeted nation is also
required to send to WHO any relevant genetic sequence data. And as we have
seen, the Foreward to these regulations presents a much larger array of
potential collaborating agencies.
Why Would the U.S. Government Surrender Its Sovereignty
Why would the U.S. give away its sovereignty to other
nations? In reality, that process has been going on at least since President
Wilson’s failed attempt to get the Senate to approve U.S. membership in the
League of Nations. It has escalated since World War II, often under the
umbrella and authority of the United Nations, with which many global predators
are enamored and use as the cover story for their predations. As documented in
our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators, Bill Gates and Klaus
Schwab have both worked out cooperative agreements for their versions of the
New World Order with the U.N.
President Biden
has recently told the Business Round Table — the presidents and CEOs of the
wealthiest 200 corporations in America — that they must lead the growing New
World Order:17
“And now is a time when things
are shifting. We’re going to — there’s going to be a new world order out there,
and we’ve got to lead it. And we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in
doing it.”
John Kerry, the President’s climate czar, had announced that
when Americans elected Biden, they voted for the Great Reset, whether they knew
it or not. [Blog Editor: Except Kerry probably was fully aware Election 2020
was a criminal coup – WATCH 2000 Mules.]
We must immediately mount an international campaign,
especially focused within America, to force the U.S. to withdraw these
amendments before they come to a vote. Otherwise, America and the nations of
the world will take a giant stride toward forfeiting national sovereignty to
WHO and the U.N. In reality; they will be forfeiting their sovereign powers to
the global predators who rule the U.N. and WHO, including the Chinese Communist
Party and supporters of the Great Reset, like Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and
giant foundations and corporations — all of whom benefit from weakening or
destroying the sovereignty of the Western nations. Western civilization, and
mainly the United States, is all that stands in strong opposition to the
globalist takeover of the world, called the New World Order or the Great Reset.
Meanwhile, the biggest story of our lifetime is going down
virtually unnoticed.
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has already ceded
Canadian sovereignty to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF). Communist
terrorist Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is about to swallow US sovereignty whole.
The continent of North America is headed toward a One World
Wasteland, killing off all chances of the survival of the West.
God help us.
Judi McLeod
is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A
former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard.
Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report,
Foxnews.com.
Older articles by
Judi McLeod
Copyright © Canada Free Press
++++++++++++++++++++
What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
May 10, 2022
Mercola.com
Odysee VIDEO: The
Global Pandemic Treaty: What You Need To Know [Length: 1:19:27]
[Posted by neverlosetruth
Posted May 10th, 2022]
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Ø The
World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on
pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global
biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine
passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical
care and more
Ø The WHO
is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO
didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021,
yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being
declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission
Ø More
importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not
work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world.
Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or
benefit from identical treatment
Ø The WHO
will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17,
2022, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote
on amendments to the International Health Regulations, May 22-28, 2022, which
may also strip away more individual rights and liberties
The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID
pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place is now hard at
work on the next phase of this New World Order.
The World Health Organization has started drafting a global
pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power
over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital
identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions,
standardized medical care and more.
In “The Corbett Report”1,2 above,
independent journalist James Corbett reviews what this treaty is, how it will
change the global landscape and strip you of some of your most basic rights and
freedoms. Make no mistake, the WHO
pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its
member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.
A Backdoor to Global Governance
As noted by anti-extremism activist Maajid
Nawaz in an April 28, 2022, Twitter post,3 the
“WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.”
COVID-19, while potentially deadly to certain vulnerable
groups, simply isn’t a valid justification for handing over more power to the
WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable “mistakes” in this and
previous pandemics.
As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit
SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021,4 yet
scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being
declared.5 The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne
transmission.6
So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more
power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to
make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone.
It seems far more likely that the WHO is being installed as
a de facto governing body for the global Deep State.7 Through
the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own
everything and control everyone, will then be able to implement their wishes
across the whole world in one fell swoop.
With this treaty in place, all member nations will be
subject to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says every person on the planet needs
to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination
compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if
the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.
As noted by Corbett, these negotiations are already well
underway,8 and the treaty is expected to be fully implemented
in 2024 — that is, unless the people of the world wake up to what’s happening
and beat back this monstrosity.
WHO Likely Seeking to Monopolize Health Care Worldwide
Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World
Economic Forum (WEF) and all its installed leaders in government and private
business, were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the
making. The pandemic was a perfect cover.
In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the
globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and
personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment.
Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership
permanent, extend it into the health care systems of every nation, and
eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part
of The Great Reset.
While this is not currently being discussed, there’s every
reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as
director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health
coverage.9
And, considering the WHO changed its definition of
“pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”10 without
the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,11,12 just
about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. The whole premise
behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.”
But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.
Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not
the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not
even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent
on age and underlying health conditions.
The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone
everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region,
person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide
blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed. Without doubt, this
can only result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual
freedom.
How the WHO Has Wielded Previous Pandemic Instruments
To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing this
new proposed international “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness
and response, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR),13 which
the U.S. signed on to in 2005.
The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health
Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).14 This is a special
legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and
procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.
As noted by Corbett, the IHR allows the unelected
director-general of the WHO to simply declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member
states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial
powers over health policy.
PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in
2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak
in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All
of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and
corrupt15 in their wake.
So, to summarize, through the IHR, the WHO has already been
significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to
pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into
spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines,
that didn’t work very well.
In that sense, the WHO is really just another
wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on
the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences
of fast-tracked vaccines. Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has
been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early
treatment with safe medicines worldwide.
As noted by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie,16 the
WHO has also claimed the mRNA shots as safe as conventional vaccines, which is
nowhere near the truth. Most all available data prove they are the most
dangerous drugs ever created. Why would anyone expect the WHO to become less
corrupt if given even more power and control?
IHR Amendments May
Also Restrict Rights and Freedoms
Now, the IHR overrode and superseded the U.S. Constitution
from the start, but in January 2022, the U.S. also submitted regulatory
amendments17 that will give the WHO even more power to restrict
your rights and freedoms.
May 22 through 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will
gather and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if passed, they will be
enacted into international law. These submitted amendments are in addition to
the WHO pandemic treaty currently under discussion. As reported by Health
Policy Watch, February 23, 2022:18
“Washington wants to fast track
a series of nitty-gritty, but far-reaching changes in the existing
International Health Regulations that govern WHO and member state emergency
alert and response — for consideration at this year’s World Health Assembly,
22-28 May.
The U.S. proposal19 for
major IHR rule changes, obtained by Health Policy Watch, has been a topic of
discussion in a series of closed-door meetings of WHO member states, which are
considering ways to reform the existing IHR, as well as advancing a whole new
WHO convention or other international instrument20 on pandemic
prevention and response ...
The U.S. is expected to lead a
parallel track of tightly-paced ‘informal’ member state negotiations to reach
consensus on an IHR reform resolution for approval at this year’s 75th WHA
[World Health Assembly] ...”
The “new WHO convention or other international instrument”
mentioned here refers to the WHO treaty currently under discussion. An
intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of
the World Health Assembly in December 2021,21 for the purpose
of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as mentioned, this
INB has begun that work.
However, as noted by Corbett, this is only the second time
in the WHO’s history that an INB has been established. The first one was the
INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control,22 22
years ago. So, this is not a well-established process, and it’s hard to predict
how it will play out.
Bill Gates Builds GERM Team for the WHO
Another clue about what the WHO intends to do with more
power comes from its primary funder, Bill Gates. Gates recently announced he’s
building a pandemic response team for the WHO, which he would like to be called
the "Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization" or GERM Team.
This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts
under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and “decide when they need to
suspend civil liberties, force populations to wear masks and close borders,”
The Counter Signal reports.23
Of course, Gates is also the largest funder of the WHO (when
you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine
Alliance). This and other relationships speak volumes about the corruption
still ruling the WHO. At the end of the day, Gates is basically paying the WHO
to dictate to the world what they must do to make Gates a ton of money. As
noted by The Counter Signal:24
“Gates’ announcement of the GERM
team coincides with the World Health Organization’s drafting of a global
pandemic treaty ... In the future, the pandemic treaty will not only ensure
that member states abide by International Health Regulations but will also put
the WHO in the driver’s seat, so to speak. Member states, including the US and
Canada, will take their orders directly from the organization. As Conservative
MP Leslyn Lewis explains:
‘The treaty includes 190
countries and would be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what
is considered a pandemic, and this could consist of broad classifications,
including an increase in cancers, heart conditions, strokes, etc. If a pandemic
is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic.
Of even more concern, if this
treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a
pandemic. They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and
can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all
approach for the entire world … A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis
doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe’ ...
It isn’t unreasonable to assume
that the GERM team, as a new branch of the WHO, would oversee making sure
member states comply with the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and
member states sign-on.
The next question, then, is how
the WHO and Bill Gates would be able to monitor every individual in every
country to determine whether enough people are sick to justify locking a region
down.
To this end, the WHO has
contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a
global vaccine passport system,25 with plans to link
every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID ... Thus, there will be one
pandemic treaty, one GERM team, one global vaccine passport, and one World
Health Organization to monitor every person on the planet.”
Under WHO Control, Vaccine Passports Are a Given
Indeed, while countries around the world have scrubbed their
COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO is still moving
ahead with a global vaccine passport program.26
So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity
rules for the world, you can bet they’ll insist on vaccine passports with
built-in digital identity and readiness for a centralized programmable central
bank digital currency (CBDC). As reported by the Western Standard:27
“The WHO fully intends to
provide support to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of
the digital verification technology for countries’ national and regional
verification of vaccine status.
‘COVID-19 affects everyone.
Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination
certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is
therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust
networks and verification technology.
The WHO’s gateway service also
serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of
future vaccination campaigns and home-based records,’ said Garrett Mehl, unit
head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s
website.”
Can We Stop the International Pandemic Treaty?
The question now is, can we stop this “international
pandemic instrument” that the WHO is seeking? With short notice, the WHO
announced it would accept public comment on the treaty for a total of five
days.28 The World Council for Health (WCH) was among the few
that acted quickly enough to submit a comment in opposition of the treaty.
Lawrie delivered the WCH’s submission.29
“The proposal to take control
of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society
... It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a
pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different
parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the
need for local decision making is of prime importance. ~ Robert Clancy, Ph.D.”
In an April 26, 2022, update on Substack, Lawrie wrote:30
“Despite the lack of notice,
many grassroots organizations did what they could to spread the word and the
World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415
million people. Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns.
So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day.”
One person who missed the deadline was professor Robert
Clancy, a leading clinical immunologist in Canada. He sent the comment he would
have wanted to submit to Lawrie, who included it in her post:31
“The proposal to take control of
pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society. I
am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly
summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the
board’ view of most Australian doctors ...
The failure to understand the
restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of
accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programs, and failure to
interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines
are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO ..
.
It is foolhardy to even suggest
that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic
zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered
by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of
prime importance.
The rule of science and the rule
of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic,
and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease
outcomes — supported by the WHO — must make very clear the foolishness of
rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.
I write this as the most
experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research
scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship.’
Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”
Make Your Voice Heard in June
While many, like Clancy, didn’t get a chance to participate,
the WHO has announced it will allow for two more days of public comment, June
16 and 17, 2022. As noted by Lawrie:32
“Please also be aware of the
proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on
this May at the World Health Assembly.
Like the pandemic treaty, this
is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of
individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty:
if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James
Roguski has written extensively about this on his Substack.33
There seems to be a concerted
effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all
angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognize the WHO as an
authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power.
We are sovereign and will not be
bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf
when signing away the inherent rights of the World's People. They do not act
for us and we will not be bound.”
I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June
16 and 17, 2022. Unfortunately, the WHO has not yet released any submission
details. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the WCH’s newsletter. The
last time, they issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment,
and are sure to do the same for the June submission window. You can subscribe at the bottom of this page, or on
the WCH’s
home page.
To block the IHR amendments at the May 2022 World Health
Assembly, we need to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A list
of U.S. delegates can be found in Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.”
For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I
would suggest contacting the regional office and ask for a list (see “Regions”
in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assembly’s webpage). It’s also
possible that the WCH will publish guidance on it, so be sure to sign up for
their newsletter.
My latest book, “The
Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant bestseller. After thousands of
reviews it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab
your copy today before it’s too late!
Sources and References
1 The Corbett
Report April 27, 2022
2 Transcript
of The Corbett Report
3 Twitter Maajid Nawaz April 28, 2022
4 World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): How
is it transmitted? December 23, 2021
5 J
Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr; 110: 89–96
6 Nature
April 6, 2022
7 Heysatyamevjayate Wordpress March 20, 2022
8 America Out Loud February 18, 2022
9 National Review June 14, 2017
10 Wayback Machine, WHO
Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009 (PDF)
11 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912
12 Wayback Machine, WHO
Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)
13, 14 CDC International Health Regulations
15 Corbett Report April 13, 2010
16, 28, 29 Tess Lawrie Substack April 13, 2022
17, 18 Health Policy Watch February 23, 2022
19 WHO Proposal for Amendments to the International Health
Regulations January 20, 2022
20, 21 WHO Proposed Method of Work February 21, 2022
22 INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
23, 24 The
Counter Signal May 2, 2022
25, 27 Western Standard March 2, 2022
26 Off-Guardian March 1, 2022
30, 31, 32 Tess Lawrie Substack April 26, 2022
33 James Roguski Substack March 31, 2022
Disclaimer: The
entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola,
unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the
respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this
website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified
health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended
as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of
Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own
health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a
qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking
medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional
before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on
your site please click here. This
content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and
information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit
format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is
required.
© 1997-2022 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights
Reserved.
