DONATE

Showing posts with label Gates GERM Team. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gates GERM Team. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

Mr. Bill’s Ugly-Dark Neighborhood


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

May 25, 2022

 

The Globalist-Fascist(Corporatist)-Marxists are so full of confident hubris about their future World-Wide Rule, they have no fear about sharing details of their global takeover ending sovereign nations. AND IN AMERICA’s case, our U.S. Constitution (which already has become pretty fractured already by Dem-Marxists, RINOs and a Leftist Activist Judicial System).

 

One example among many: Bill Gates’ new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.” Get ready for a dose of tyranny you will be told to like and obey.

 

JRH 5/25/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**************************

Bill Gates: The Psychopath As Philanthropist

The Microsoft founder wants to own your DNA but, don't worry, it's for your own good!

 

By Emerald Robinson

May 25, 2022

Emerald Robinson’s The Right Way

 

There’s a joke being told in my house this week: Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend, a little-known and slightly autistic high school dropout named Bill Gates has a new book out this month. Perhaps you’ve heard of him?

 

Unfortunately, of course, we have all heard of him.

 

From Borneo to Boston, the entire world is only too familiar with the man who wants to inject you into the future. Bill Gates is the front man — the public face — of Big Pharma’s global COVID tyranny. Lockdowns? He loves them! Booster shots forever? He thinks it’s a smart idea! Germ warfare simulations? Sign him up! There’s no dystopian technological overreach that Gates won’t enthusiastically endorse. He would have already harvested your DNA and stuck it in a Shenzhen genome sequencing machine — if not for the pesky issue of, you know, human rights.

 

Who else would be dumb enough to evangelize that all of the world’s problems could be solved with the tip of a syringe? That’s an idiotic message because it’s so obviously untrue. Gates doesn’t have any interest in people shaping their own future — he wants to shape your future, and he would really appreciate it if you’d get out of the way. His unlimited faith in science and technology — which is the crudest form of religion for materialists — has merged seamlessly with his unlimited faith in himself so that it’s hard to tell where the monomaniacal narcissism and the philanthropic pretenses begin and end in the Universe of Bill.

 

Of course the problem with the Universe of Bill Gates is that it contains a massive black hole at the center — which is his personality. He has always had a very big problem as a vaccine evangelist: he has never understood how much he strikes other people as abnormally creepy.

  

Depopulation Bill Gates

 

This is not simply my personal opinion. It’s the common opinion of people who have never met Gates personally — but have read his books or watched his speeches.

 

Here’s Jeffrey Tucker reviewing Gates’ latest book just this week:

 

Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.

 

It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.

 

In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people.

 

Now you are alarmed.

 

In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book…

 

Jeffrey Tucker didn’t come away from reading the book thinking that Gates was well-meaning but misinformed — or basically good but flawed —he came away thinking Gates was crazy. This turns out to be a recurring theme among people who deal the co-founder of Microsoft.

 

A journalist named James Corbett also reviewed the same book recently and found it “every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible” as you would imagine. “There is certainly nothing of scientific or medical value in here,” according to Corbett. “There’s nothing even interesting here. It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective.” He sums up the book by saying: “Just when you thought you’d gotten rid of him, like a canker sore in the mouth of humanity, Bill Gates pops up yet again.”

 

So that’s two bad book reviews. The funny thing is that most of the world’s population now shares the same feelings about Bill Gates that these two book reviewers have — and none of us have even read the book.

 

That’s because Bill Gates is a new kind of villain: he’s a psychopath pretending to be a philanthropist.

 

If you thought that Bill Gates might do the sensible thing, and keep a low profile after his wife pursued a nasty and public divorce over his ties to an international pedophile sex trafficking ring — you would be wrong. Being sensible is for ordinary psychopaths who are concerned about exposure, and can sense reputational danger. But if you’re a psychopath who is also the world’s third wealthiest human being and “on the spectrum” you probably don’t understand what exposure means because you’re not really in touch with human morality in any fundamental sense.

 

After all, you capture — or, if you prefer, “influence” or “invest” or “collaborate” or whatever the global elite likes to call legalized bribery this week! — entire foreign governments and international non-government organizations from Monday to Friday every week. Basically, you think you’re God — and nobody you’ve bought (and that’s practically everybody) wants to dissuade you from that feeling.

 

So you don’t even bother taking a break from your busy schedule of pretending to be the world’s leading TV expert on pandemics — because you’re too busy blocking out the sun, and buying up America’s farmland, and signing deals with Chinese DNA harvesting firms, and teaching Seattle schoolkids that math is racist.

 

And when you need a little R&R in your spare time, you don’t just hang out with the kind of friends that ordinary psychopaths collect — no way! — you spend your time with the world’s most infamous pedophile. I mean: you’re a trailblazer, and you only want to associate with other innovators — am I right? And when the little people start to wonder why you were hanging out (37 times!) with the world’s most infamous pedophile five years after that pedophile was forced to register as a sex offender you actually come up with the dumbest excuse in the history of mankind: you claim that you were simply trying to win the Nobel Peace Prize!

 

Of course, your own ex-wife would beg to differ.

 

That’s what makes Bill Gates special among billionaire psychopaths: his excuses are so childish and stupid that you would have to be autistic yourself to believe them.

 

In fact, his body language is so telling and awful in his frequent TV guest appearances that experts have a field day explaining his gestures and his sudden loss of speech whenever he’s questioned about Jeffrey Epstein or vaccine safety.

 

But does that stop Bill Gates from doing more TV interviews? Of course not. Only Bill Gates can stop Bill Gates — and you wouldn’t be Bill Gates if thought that Bill Gates could be stopped.

 

He will tell you that he’s simply the victim of wild conspiracy theories — and he will say that right after he tells you that he cannot recall why he flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane when he owns a bigger plane himself! And that lame excuse might come right after he explains that he has no idea why he was secretly donating millions of dollars to MIT using Epstein as a cut-out! And, furthermore, he really has absolutely not the faintest clue why Jeffrey Epstein would name the Gates Foundation’s science advisor as the trustee to his will right before his death!

 

Normal people might have questions about these obvious evasions of reality. Questions like: why did his divorce from Melinda Gates coincide with the incarceration of Ghislaine Maxwell? Why does a high school dropout tech geek with no medical experience get to pretend that’s he’s in charge of global health policy? And why is Bill Gates the only friend of Jeffrey Epstein who gets pretend that he was “taking meetings to win the Nobel Peace Prize” when every other friend of Jeffrey Epstein is basically in hiding because “those meetings” with Jeffrey Epstein were obviously to rape children?

 

When Bill Gates has a moment to explain it, Prince Andrew would like a word.

 

Youtube VIDEO: Bill Gates's INCREDIBLY AWKWARD Interview - Is He Hiding Something??

 


 

[Posted by Russell Brand

Posted on Oct 4, 2021

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

Bill Gates doesn’t have to answer to Prince Andrew, of course, because he doesn’t have to answer to anyone — he’s too busy buying public opinion to answer to it. If American corporate media gets too interested in Bill’s “Peace Prize meetings” then he will just buy the American corporate media — or start his own with George Soros and Katie Couric! If global warming becomes a major issue, Bill Gates will just block out the sun! If there’s too much carbon in the atmosphere, Bill Gates has got a solution.

 

Just remember: you are the carbon that the climate change zealots want to reduce.

 

You know what I’m talking about. A COVID virus pandemic breaks out globally, and Bill Gates is perfectly positioned to “rescue us” with experimental and ineffective vaccines. We find out that he’s the largest private owner of farmland in the United States and a global food shortage begins. We find out that there’s a baby formula shortage in the United States— and Gates is suddenly an investor in synthetic baby formula made in a lab.

 

Are you starting to sense a pattern yet?

 

What are the odds that Bill Gates is involved in the monkeypox virus? What are the chances that he’s collaborating or investing or partnering or subsidizing some researcher right now who will discover a vaccine about ten minutes after the monkeypox arrives on the front page of every newspaper in the world? Gates is already warning about the next pandemic before the next pandemic even arrives — and sometimes the vaccines even arrive at the same time the virus does!

 

That’s what happens in the Universe of Bill from time to time: the solution gets released before the problem does. Rest assured: those bugs are being fixed in the next germ warfare simulation. The global elites will run the monkeypox virus much better than the COVID virus.

 

Don’t worry: your new vaccine booster is on the way.

 

The future is a scary place but the world’s leading philanthropist will lead the way.

 

There’s no need to worry: Bill Gates has thought of everything.

 

ANNOY A LIBERAL SUPPORT EMERALD!

© 2022 Emerald Robinson

 

+++++++++++++++++++

Bill Gates Lays Out Plan for Global Takeover

 

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

May 25, 2022

Mercola.com

 

Rumble VIDEO: The Corbett Report MAY 10, 2022: I READ BILL GATES' NEW BOOK (SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO!)

[Posted by The Corbett Report

Published May 10, 2022

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

 

Ø The World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response and, ultimately, all health care decisions

 

Ø Bill Gates intends to play a key part in this takeover. He’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the "Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization" or GERM Team, which will have the authority to monitor nations and make pandemic response decisions, such as when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness

 

Ø The globalist cabal plans to seize control through biosecurity governance, and they’re attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance

 

Ø The first attack comes in the form of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), which are currently being voted on by the World Health Assembly. These amendments will strip member nations of their sovereignty and give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict your medical freedoms and civil liberties in the name of biosecurity. Get involved and urge your nation’s leaders to reject the amendments if passed. Unless rejected, they will become binding law in November 2022

 

Ø The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom

 

In “The Corbett Report” above,1 independent journalist James Corbett reviews the contents of Bill Gates’ book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.”

 

“It’s every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible as you would expect,” he says. “This is a ridiculous book ... There’s certainly nothing of medical or scientific value in here ... It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective ...

 

Gates’ goal in writing the book is to disarm the public and prepare us to accept the agenda that Gates and his allies would like to impose on the world. Ultimately, what this is about is drumming up general public support — or at least general public understanding — of the unfolding biosecurity agenda.”

 

Another reviewer of Gates’ book, economist Jeffrey Tucker, offered similarly negative feedback:2

 

“Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.

 

It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.

 

In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people. Now you are alarmed. In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book ‘How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.’”

 

Gates’ Book Chapter by Chapter

 

Corbett goes through Gates’ book chapter by chapter, so if you’re short on time, you can review the ones that interest you the most:

 

Chapter 1: Learn from COVID (timestamp: 12:58)

 

Chapter 2: Create a pandemic prevention team (timestamp: 18:23)

 

Chapter 3: Get better at detecting outbreaks early (timestamp: 26:21)

 

Chapter 4: Help people protect themselves right away (timestamp: 31:01)

 

Chapter 5: Find new treatments fast (timestamp: 37:26)

 

Chapter 6: Get ready to make vaccines (timestamp: 39:46)

 

Chapter 7: Practice, practice, practice (timestamp: 47:06)

 

Chapter 8: Close the health gap between rich and poor countries (timestamp: 50:49)

 

Chapter 9: Make — and fund — a plan for preventing pandemics (timestamp: 57:40)

 

Afterword: How COVID changed the course of our digital future (timestamp: 1:03:00)

 

Gates GERM Team

 

[I found the] Youtube version VIDEO: Kim Iversen: Lockdowns For Life? Bill Gates Reveals Alarming Plan To Prevent Future Pandemics


 

[Posted by The Hill

Posted May 4, 2022

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

By now, you’ve probably heard that the World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response, and ultimately, all health care decisions. But did you know Bill Gates, the largest funder of the WHO (if you combine funding from his foundation and GAVI), also intends to play a key part in this takeover?

 

As Gates explains in a video at the beginning of Corbett’s report, he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the "Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization" or GERM Team. This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and make decisions about when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness.3

 

Alas, as noted by “Rising” host Kim Iversen in the video compilation above, if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it’s that stopping the spread of a virus is more or less impossible, no matter how draconian the rules. Meanwhile, the side effects of lockdowns and business shutdowns are manifold.

 

People’s health has suffered from lack of health care. Depression and suicide have skyrocketed. Economies have gone bust. Violent crime has risen. Tucker also points out the false premise behind Gates’ pandemic prevention plan, stating:4

 

“This theory of virus control — the notion that muscling the population makes a prevalent virus shrink into submission and disappear — is a completely new invention, the mechanization of a primitive instinct.

 

Smallpox occupies a unique position among infectious diseases as the only one affecting humans that has been eradicated. There are reasons for that: a stable pathogen, a great vaccine, and a hundred years of focused public health work. This happened not due to lockdowns but from the careful and patient application of traditional public-health principles.

 

[T]he attempt to crush a respiratory virus through universal avoidance could be worse than allowing endemicity to it to develop throughout the population.”

 

Gates’ Destructive Greed

 

During COVID, we basically traded false protection against one thing for a multitude of other ills that are far worse in the long run. Now, Gates and the WHO want to make this disastrous strategy the norm.

 

Once again, we see Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate what the world must do to make him a ton of money, because he’s always heavily invested in the very “solutions” he presents to the world. While he’s built a reputation as a philanthropist, his actions are self-serving, and more often than not, the recipients of his “generosity” end up worse than they were before.

 

Case in point: After 15 years, Gates’ Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) project has now been proven an epic fail.5 Gates promised the project would “double yields and incomes for 30 million farming households by 2020.”

 

That false prognosis was deleted from the AGRA website in June 2020, after a Tuft University assessment revealed hunger had actually increased by 31%. February 28, 2022, the first-ever evaluation report6 confirmed the failure of AGRA.

 

The Globalists’ Double-Prong Attack on National Sovereignty

 

But getting back to the globalists’ plan to seize global control through biosecurity governance, they are attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance.

 

The first attack comes in the form of amendments7 to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO.

 

Starting with the first takeover strategy, as you read this, countries around the world are in the process of voting on amendments to the IHR.8 By May 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will have concluded their vote on these amendments and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law in November 2022.

 

The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).9 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. While the IHR grants the WHO exceptional power over global health policy already, under the current rules, member states must consent to the WHO’s recommendations.

 

This is one key feature that is up for revision. Under the new amendments, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member state over the objection of that state. The amendments also include ceding control to WHO regional directors authorized to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).

 

In summary, the IHR amendments establish “a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting and management,” Robert Malone, Ph.D., warns,10 and we the public have no say in the matter.

 

We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name of biosecurity. There’s not even a publicly available list of who the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.

 

Summary of Proposed IHR Amendments

 

A summary of the proposed changes to the IHR was recently provided by Malone.11 In all, the WHO wants to amend 13 different IHR articles (articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53 and 59), the end result of which is the following:12

 

1. “Increased surveillance — Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from COVID-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.

 

2. 48-hour deadline — Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.

 

3. Secret sources — Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.

 

4. Weakened sovereignty — Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern.

 

The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.”

 

Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations will have only a limited time — six months — to reject them. That would put us into November 2022. Any nation which hasn’t officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace period will be null and void.

 

Attack No. 2: The WHO Pandemic Treaty

 

The second attempt to gain global control is through an international pandemic treaty with the WHO. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021,13 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty.

 

In summary, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent. It can then extend its power into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset.

 

While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general is to push the world toward universal health coverage.14

 

And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”15 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,16,17 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion.

 

The problem with this treaty is that it simply cannot work. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.

 

“The WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.”

 

Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.

 

The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

 

Are You Ready to Cede All Authority to Gates-Led Group?

 

Rumble VIDEO: BILL GATES REVEALS THE HIGHWIRE WAS RIGHT

[Posted by The HighWire with Del Bigtree  

Published May 13, 2022

 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

 

In closing, Gates’ GERM team would be the ones with the authority to declare pandemics and coordinate global response.18 Are you ready to cede all authority over your life, health and livelihood to the likes of Gates? I hope not.

 

In the video above, Del Bigtree with “The Highwire” provides poignant examples where Gates is now admitting what “The Highwire,” I and many others have been saying since the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, and getting censored and deplatformed for it.

 

Gates is two years behind everyone else, yet despite his apparent inability to interpret the readily available data, he now wants power to dictate health rules to the whole world. We can’t let that happen.

 

Join the Global #StopTheWHO Campaign

 

It’s going to require a global response to prevent these two power grabs, starting with the IHR amendments under vote by the World Health Assembly. To that end, the World Council for Health has launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign. Here’s how you can get involved:19

 

o   Speak — Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles, posters, videos

 

o   Act — Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal notices and cases and similar campaigns

 

o   Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council for Health

 

o   Explore activist toolboxes such as: www.dontyoudare.info and stopthewho.com

 

o   Engage global indigenous leadership to take a united stand against the WHO’s IHR

 

o   Notify World Health Assembly country delegates to oppose the IHR amendments

 

o   Activate people’s parliaments, legislatures or referendums to oppose power grabs

 

My latest book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant bestseller. After thousands of reviews it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab your copy today before it’s too late!

 

 Sources and References

 

1 Corbett Report Episode 418, May 10, 2022

2, 4 Brownstone Institute May 3, 2022

3 The Counter Signal May 2, 2022

5 Corey’s Digs April 27, 2022

6 USRTK March 17, 2022

7 Health Policy Watch February 23, 2022

8, 9 CDC International Health Regulations

10, 11, 12, 19 RW Malone Substack May 17, 2022

13 WHO Proposed Method of Work February 21, 2022

14 National Review June 14, 2017

15 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009 (PDF)

16 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912

17 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)

18 The Lancet May 14, 2022; 399(10338): 1853

 

© 1997-2022 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.


Wednesday, May 11, 2022

WHO World Governance?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 11, 2022

 

There is some news that has been transpiring for quite a while that the Globalist Dem-Marxist MSM mouthpieces have failed to report to Americans. NAMELY THIS: The World Health Organization (WHO) has been maneuvering nations across the globe to give up national sovereignty to WHO global governance in the name managing diseasing regardless of National laws in Representative governments.

 

EVEN MORE HORRIFIC to American Sovereignty, the FRAUDULENTLY elected Biden who seized power in the 2020 Election Coup is promoting WHO global governance!

 

Judi McLeod of the Canada Free Press and Dr. Joseph Mercola examine the details of this SNEAKY-stealth path to ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT rendering our already decimated U.S. Constitution even more worthless to protect Individual Liberty/

 

[The Mercola post uses a Corbett Report that is lengthy because it includes actual public venue testimony under the management of the WHO. You might want to read Mercola first, then watch the video.]

 

JRH 5/11/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*****************************

Warning: American Sovereignty About To Be Swallowed Whole By U.N’s World Health Organization

The continent of North America is headed toward a One World Wasteland, killing off all chances of the survival of the West

 

 

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director or Dictator

 

By Judi McLeod

May 10, 2022

Canada Free Press

 


Take one last longing look at the America we love because the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO) is about to swallow its sovereignty whole—on a deadline looming as soon as May 22.

 

You won’t be hearing about it from a gossip-filled duped mainstream or social media. There will be no warning from Barack Obama mouthpiece, President Joe Biden.

 

Former Congress rep Michele Bachmann calls the coming May 22 WHO vote: “The biggest global power grab that we have seen in our lifetimes.”

 

Michele Bachmann: WHO Vote Threatens U.S. Sovereignty

 

That’s what Bachmann told  Steve Bannon about the upcoming vote in Geneva over the Biden administration’s amendments that would cede US sovereignty to the WHO over national healthcare decisions.

 

Rumble VIDEO: Michele Bachmann: WHO Vote Threatens U.S. Sovereignty

[Posted by Bannons War Room

Published May 9, 2022]

 

While caught up in a spider web of orchestrated diversions, the sovereignty of some 193 UN captured  nations—including America—is at stake.

 

The only source that can stop it are We the People whose country is about to have its sovereignty swept away:

 

“There’s an international law up for final approval later this month that removes our bodily autonomy rights, and rights due Americans pertaining to freedom, laws, and sovereignty and, instead, puts the decision making power and actual control in the hands of the WHO and the people who did this latest escapade in medical profiteering. The date it’s to be finished is May 22nd and it will be finalized unless enough people rally against it,” CFP reader Larry Holm warns patriots today.

 

“Getting word out is vital, and several good ways to rally against it including sending a pre-written letter to state reps.

 

“I’m seeing the warnings from lots of doctors and lawyers who hate the lies and tyranny we’ve already been under and that you help expose. Hope you can help on this message too.”

 

‘Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO’

 

Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our national sovereignty and freedom. (America Out Loud, May 4, 2022)

 

“On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).

 

“This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as “Provisional agenda item 16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.1

 

“These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.

 

“If passed, the Biden Administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations, all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population.2

 

“These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3 U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.

 

How It Became Official

 

“On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations.4 The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…”5 By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will. (America Out Loud)

 

WHO’s Sweeping New Powers

 

§  The sweeping new powers will be invested in the Director-General of WHO to act on his own.


The Director-General is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, commonly known as Tedros. Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party. Despite the fact that his role as the cover-up apologist for the Chinese Communists at the onset of COVID-19, this “dear friend of Anthony Fauci” was re-elected without opposition in 2022 to a second five-year term.11 His original election in 2017, followed by his re-election without opposition in 2022, is an ominous display of Chinese Communist influence over WHO,12 which makes further empowering the U.N. agency extremely dangerous.

 

The World Health Organization is run by a terrorist

 

The head of the World Health Organization was a member of a violent revolutionary communist party in Ethiopia: Tigray People’s Liberation Front. The Department of Homeland Security clearly states:

 

“The TPLF qualifies as a Tier III terrorist organization… on the basis of its violent activities…”

 

Source: (Stop World Control)

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus circled red

 

§  Under the new regulations, WHO will not be required to consult with the identified nation beforehand to “verify” the event before taking action. This requirement is stricken by the U.S. amendments (Article 9.1). The amendments require a response in 24 hours from the identified nation, or WHO will identify it as “rejection” and act independently (Article 10.3). If the identified nation “does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall ... immediately share with the other State Parties the information available to it…” (Article 10.4).

 

§  Indicating the breadth of WHO’s scope of power, the agency will be given the right to involve multiple other U.N. agencies, including those related to food and agriculture, animal health, environmental programs, “or other relevant entities” (Article 6.1). This, too will not require the permission of the identified nation. The targeted nation is also required to send to WHO any relevant genetic sequence data. And as we have seen, the Foreward to these regulations presents a much larger array of potential collaborating agencies.

 

Why Would the U.S. Government Surrender Its Sovereignty

 

Why would the U.S. give away its sovereignty to other nations? In reality, that process has been going on at least since President Wilson’s failed attempt to get the Senate to approve U.S. membership in the League of Nations. It has escalated since World War II, often under the umbrella and authority of the United Nations, with which many global predators are enamored and use as the cover story for their predations. As documented in our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators, Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab have both worked out cooperative agreements for their versions of the New World Order with the U.N.

 

President Biden has recently told the Business Round Table — the presidents and CEOs of the wealthiest 200 corporations in America — that they must lead the growing New World Order:17

 

“And now is a time when things are shifting. We’re going to — there’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it. And we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.”

 

John Kerry, the President’s climate czar, had announced that when Americans elected Biden, they voted for the Great Reset, whether they knew it or not. [Blog Editor: Except Kerry probably was fully aware Election 2020 was a criminal coup – WATCH 2000 Mules.]

 

We must immediately mount an international campaign, especially focused within America, to force the U.S. to withdraw these amendments before they come to a vote. Otherwise, America and the nations of the world will take a giant stride toward forfeiting national sovereignty to WHO and the U.N. In reality; they will be forfeiting their sovereign powers to the global predators who rule the U.N. and WHO, including the Chinese Communist Party and supporters of the Great Reset, like Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and giant foundations and corporations — all of whom benefit from weakening or destroying the sovereignty of the Western nations. Western civilization, and mainly the United States, is all that stands in strong opposition to the globalist takeover of the world, called the New World Order or the Great Reset.

 

Meanwhile, the biggest story of our lifetime is going down virtually unnoticed.

 

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has already ceded Canadian sovereignty to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF). Communist terrorist Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is about to swallow US sovereignty whole.

 

The continent of North America is headed toward a One World Wasteland, killing off all chances of the survival of the West.

 

God help us.

 

Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com.

 

Older articles by Judi McLeod

 

Copyright © Canada Free Press

 

++++++++++++++++++++

What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty

 

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

May 10, 2022

Mercola.com

 

Odysee VIDEO: The Global Pandemic Treaty: What You Need To Know [Length: 1:19:27]

[Posted by neverlosetruth

Posted May 10th, 2022]

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

 

Ø The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more

 

Ø The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission

 

Ø More importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world. Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or benefit from identical treatment

 

Ø The WHO will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17, 2022, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations, May 22-28, 2022, which may also strip away more individual rights and liberties

 

The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place is now hard at work on the next phase of this New World Order.

 

The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more.

 

In “The Corbett Report”1,2 above, independent journalist James Corbett reviews what this treaty is, how it will change the global landscape and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms. Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.

 

A Backdoor to Global Governance

 

As noted by anti-extremism activist Maajid Nawaz in an April 28, 2022, Twitter post,3 the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.”

 

COVID-19, while potentially deadly to certain vulnerable groups, simply isn’t a valid justification for handing over more power to the WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable “mistakes” in this and previous pandemics.

 

As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021,4 yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared.5 The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.6

 

So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone.

 

It seems far more likely that the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State.7 Through the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own everything and control everyone, will then be able to implement their wishes across the whole world in one fell swoop.

 

With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.

 

As noted by Corbett, these negotiations are already well underway,8 and the treaty is expected to be fully implemented in 2024 — that is, unless the people of the world wake up to what’s happening and beat back this monstrosity.

 

WHO Likely Seeking to Monopolize Health Care Worldwide

 

Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and all its installed leaders in government and private business, were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the making. The pandemic was a perfect cover.

 

In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment.

 

Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership permanent, extend it into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset.

 

While this is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health coverage.9

 

And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”10 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,11,12 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.

 

Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.

 

The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed. Without doubt, this can only result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

 

How the WHO Has Wielded Previous Pandemic Instruments

 

To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing this new proposed international “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR),13 which the U.S. signed on to in 2005.

 

The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).14 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.

 

As noted by Corbett, the IHR allows the unelected director-general of the WHO to simply declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial powers over health policy.

 

PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt15 in their wake.

 

So, to summarize, through the IHR, the WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well.

 

In that sense, the WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines. Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early treatment with safe medicines worldwide.

 

As noted by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie,16 the WHO has also claimed the mRNA shots as safe as conventional vaccines, which is nowhere near the truth. Most all available data prove they are the most dangerous drugs ever created. Why would anyone expect the WHO to become less corrupt if given even more power and control?

 

IHR Amendments May Also Restrict Rights and Freedoms

 

Now, the IHR overrode and superseded the U.S. Constitution from the start, but in January 2022, the U.S. also submitted regulatory amendments17 that will give the WHO even more power to restrict your rights and freedoms.

 

May 22 through 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will gather and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law. These submitted amendments are in addition to the WHO pandemic treaty currently under discussion. As reported by Health Policy Watch, February 23, 2022:18

 

“Washington wants to fast track a series of nitty-gritty, but far-reaching changes in the existing International Health Regulations that govern WHO and member state emergency alert and response — for consideration at this year’s World Health Assembly, 22-28 May.

 

The U.S. proposal19 for major IHR rule changes, obtained by Health Policy Watch, has been a topic of discussion in a series of closed-door meetings of WHO member states, which are considering ways to reform the existing IHR, as well as advancing a whole new WHO convention or other international instrument20 on pandemic prevention and response ...

 

The U.S. is expected to lead a parallel track of tightly-paced ‘informal’ member state negotiations to reach consensus on an IHR reform resolution for approval at this year’s 75th WHA [World Health Assembly] ...”

 

The “new WHO convention or other international instrument” mentioned here refers to the WHO treaty currently under discussion. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021,21 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as mentioned, this INB has begun that work.

 

However, as noted by Corbett, this is only the second time in the WHO’s history that an INB has been established. The first one was the INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control,22 22 years ago. So, this is not a well-established process, and it’s hard to predict how it will play out.

 

Bill Gates Builds GERM Team for the WHO

 

Another clue about what the WHO intends to do with more power comes from its primary funder, Bill Gates. Gates recently announced he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, which he would like to be called the "Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization" or GERM Team.

 

This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and “decide when they need to suspend civil liberties, force populations to wear masks and close borders,” The Counter Signal reports.23

 

Of course, Gates is also the largest funder of the WHO (when you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and other relationships speak volumes about the corruption still ruling the WHO. At the end of the day, Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate to the world what they must do to make Gates a ton of money. As noted by The Counter Signal:24

 

“Gates’ announcement of the GERM team coincides with the World Health Organization’s drafting of a global pandemic treaty ... In the future, the pandemic treaty will not only ensure that member states abide by International Health Regulations but will also put the WHO in the driver’s seat, so to speak. Member states, including the US and Canada, will take their orders directly from the organization. As Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis explains:

 

‘The treaty includes 190 countries and would be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what is considered a pandemic, and this could consist of broad classifications, including an increase in cancers, heart conditions, strokes, etc. If a pandemic is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic.

 

Of even more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic. They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world … A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe’ ...

 

It isn’t unreasonable to assume that the GERM team, as a new branch of the WHO, would oversee making sure member states comply with the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and member states sign-on.

 

The next question, then, is how the WHO and Bill Gates would be able to monitor every individual in every country to determine whether enough people are sick to justify locking a region down.

 

To this end, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system,25 with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID ... Thus, there will be one pandemic treaty, one GERM team, one global vaccine passport, and one World Health Organization to monitor every person on the planet.”

 

Under WHO Control, Vaccine Passports Are a Given

 

Indeed, while countries around the world have scrubbed their COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO is still moving ahead with a global vaccine passport program.26

 

So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity rules for the world, you can bet they’ll insist on vaccine passports with built-in digital identity and readiness for a centralized programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC). As reported by the Western Standard:27

 

“The WHO fully intends to provide support to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of the digital verification technology for countries’ national and regional verification of vaccine status.

 

‘COVID-19 affects everyone. Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology.

 

The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records,’ said Garrett Mehl, unit head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s website.”

 

Can We Stop the International Pandemic Treaty?

 

The question now is, can we stop this “international pandemic instrument” that the WHO is seeking? With short notice, the WHO announced it would accept public comment on the treaty for a total of five days.28 The World Council for Health (WCH) was among the few that acted quickly enough to submit a comment in opposition of the treaty. Lawrie delivered the WCH’s submission.29

 

“The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society ... It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance. ~ Robert Clancy, Ph.D.”

 

In an April 26, 2022, update on Substack, Lawrie wrote:30

 

“Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organizations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people. Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day.”

 

One person who missed the deadline was professor Robert Clancy, a leading clinical immunologist in Canada. He sent the comment he would have wanted to submit to Lawrie, who included it in her post:31

 

“The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society. I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the board’ view of most Australian doctors ...

 

The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programs, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO ..

.

It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance.

 

The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcomes — supported by the WHO — must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.

 

I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship.’ Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”

 

Make Your Voice Heard in June

 

While many, like Clancy, didn’t get a chance to participate, the WHO has announced it will allow for two more days of public comment, June 16 and 17, 2022. As noted by Lawrie:32

 

“Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly.

 

Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguski has written extensively about this on his Substack.33

 

There seems to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognize the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power.

 

We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World's People. They do not act for us and we will not be bound.”

 

I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June 16 and 17, 2022. Unfortunately, the WHO has not yet released any submission details. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the WCH’s newsletter. The last time, they issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment, and are sure to do the same for the June submission window. You can subscribe at the bottom of this page, or on the WCH’s home page.

 

To block the IHR amendments at the May 2022 World Health Assembly, we need to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A list of U.S. delegates can be found in Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.”

 

For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I would suggest contacting the regional office and ask for a list (see “Regions” in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assembly’s webpage). It’s also possible that the WCH will publish guidance on it, so be sure to sign up for their newsletter.

 

My latest book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant bestseller. After thousands of reviews it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab your copy today before it’s too late!

 

Sources and References

 

1 The Corbett Report April 27, 2022

2 Transcript of The Corbett Report

3 Twitter Maajid Nawaz April 28, 2022

4 World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): How is it transmitted? December 23, 2021

5 J Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr; 110: 89–96

6 Nature April 6, 2022

7 Heysatyamevjayate Wordpress March 20, 2022

8 America Out Loud February 18, 2022

9 National Review June 14, 2017

10 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009 (PDF)

11 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912

12 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)

13, 14 CDC International Health Regulations

15 Corbett Report April 13, 2010

16, 28, 29 Tess Lawrie Substack April 13, 2022

17, 18 Health Policy Watch February 23, 2022

19 WHO Proposal for Amendments to the International Health Regulations January 20, 2022

20, 21 WHO Proposed Method of Work February 21, 2022

22 INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

23, 24 The Counter Signal May 2, 2022

25, 27 Western Standard March 2, 2022

26 Off-Guardian March 1, 2022

30, 31, 32 Tess Lawrie Substack April 26, 2022

33 James Roguski Substack March 31, 2022

 

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

 

If you want to use an article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.

 

© 1997-2022 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.