© May 18, 2018
Hardly any media outlets whether TV, radio or print; inform
on Deep State matters are being exposed. Why? Because the Mainstream Media
(MSM) is Leftist and is the propaganda machine of the Deep State dedicated to
take down our duly Elected President Donald Trump by whatever lie they can get
to stick on the memories of the Americans that are gullible.
Because of this MSM blackout, I’m doing my part of cross
posting the increasingly growing steady stream of news showing Deep State
cadres are extremely close to being exposed form criminal activities.
********************************
Ex-US Attorney: Obama CIA Chief
Led Operation To Frame Trump
The Trump campaign/Russian collusion narrative — which led
to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation — has been steadily unraveling
in recent weeks.
Despite a year long investigation into allegations of
Russian interference in the 2016 election, “no credible evidence” of collusion with the
Trump campaign has been found, and the “evidence” and intelligence that has
been offered up appears to be false and manufactured.
Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova spoke about that and other
recent developments during an appearance
on Fox News with Laura Ingraham on Tuesday night, and cast the
blame on the operation, which he viewed as a set up to frame President Donald Trump, on
former Obama administration CIA Director John Brennan.
“It was abundantly clear that there was no legitimate basis
even for a counter intelligence investigation, let alone a criminal
investigation,” DiGenova said.
“It is quite obvious that John Brennan was at the head of
the group of people who were going to create a counter intelligence
investigation against Trump by creating false information that was going to be
fed through Carter Page, and fed through George Papadopoulos so that it would
be picked up, reported back to Washington and provide the basis for a counter,
a fake, counter intelligence investigation,” he continued.
“And it was all Brennan’s doing,” DiGenova stated
emphatically.
“And that is why the Justice Department is viciously
fighting revealing everything they can about the source in London, who
everybody knows the identity of.”
Ingraham asked the former U.S. attorney to further explain
recent reports about an unnamed “source” in London who allegedly provided
information that was used as a basis for the FBI investigation into the Trump
campaign.
“The source in London was another person who was feeding
false information to George Papadopoulos and others about collusion which did
not exist,” DiGenova replied.
Another guest on the program, former federal prosecutor
Sidney Powell, spoke about another aspect of the creation of the Trump/Russia
collusion narrative and the anti-Trump dossier compiled by former British
intelligence agent Christopher Steele on behalf of Democrat-funded political
opposition research firm Fusion GPS.
She noted how the FBI had granted access to a handful of
private contractors, likely to include Fusion GPS, to sift through raw
intelligence gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This was
then passed on to Steele and others and recycled back to the U.S. intelligence
community with a false air of legitimacy to help form the narrative used as the
basis for the investigation into Trump.
DiGenova picked up on what Powell had mentioned and pointed
out that there had been two opinions issued by the FISA court in opposition to
that illegal practice of allowing private contractors access to the sensitive
raw intelligence data.
“All of that was designed for the unmasking and the leaking
of the names, and that was all done by private contractors,” DiGenova said.
“The FISA court objected to it and it never stopped.”
The supposition that Brennan was the ringleader of an
attempt to “frame” Trump is little more than DiGenova’s opinion, informed
however well it might be by experience and information obtained through public
and private sources.
That said, it increasingly appears as though the entire
Trump/Russia collusion narrative was indeed created wholly out of false,
manufactured or misconstrued information in order to provide justification for
the investigation that was likely intended to prevent Trump from winning the
election, or at least hamstring his agenda and lead to his impeachment once he
took office.
On top of that, Brennan has made it blatantly obvious that
he loathes Trump, so it isn’t too much of a stretch
to think he may have used the powerful intelligence tools at his disposal in
order to “frame” an innocent man and destroy him politically. Hopefully we will
find out the truth soon when the DOJ inspector general’s report is released.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our
stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting
mainstream media sources. When you share to your
friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment
and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
++++++++++++++++
Trump: Obama FBI Spied on
Campaign, ‘Bigger Than Watergate’
One paragraph from a recent New York Times article has sparked
indignant reactions from President Donald Trump and a number of his political
allies.
According to Fox News, the revelation that “at least one
government informant met several times” with two advisers during the 2016
presidential cycle led to speculation that the FBI was conducting espionage
within the Trump campaign.
The Times report indicated the informant met with both
Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, prompting Trump and others to speculate
about the extent of the operation within the Trump campaign.
In a tweet on the topic Thursday morning, the president
cited National Review columnist Andrew McCarthy’s assessment of the new
details.
Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI “SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN EMBEDDED INFORMANT.” Andrew McCarthy says, “There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.” If so, this is bigger than Watergate!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 17, 2018
“Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI ‘SPIED
ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN EMBEDDED INFORMANT,'” Trump wrote. “Andrew
McCarthy says, ‘There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one
confidential informant in the campaign.'”
He claimed the allegation, if true, would be a conspiracy
“bigger than Watergate!”
That tweet came one year after the appointment of Department
of Justice special counsel Robert Mueller, who has gone on to secure
indictments against some of the figures involved in the investigation. Trump
marked the anniversary by attacking those in charge of the probe.
Despite the disgusting, illegal and unwarranted Witch Hunt, we have had the most successful first 17 month Administration in U.S. history - by far! Sorry to the Fake News Media and “Haters,” but that’s the way it is!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 17, 2018
In one tweet, he once again called the investigation a
“Witch Hunt,” this time adding “disgusting” and “illegal” to his description.
Trump went on to claim that despite the DOJ probe, he has
had “the most successful first 17 month Administration in U.S. history – by
far!”
Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who was added to the
president’s legal team last month, weighed in on the latest news by discusing [sic]
a scenario in which former FBI Director James Comey should face criminal
prosecution.
He appeared on “Fox & Friends” on Thursday to decry the
behavior outlined in The Times article.
“That would be the biggest scandal in the history of this
town, at least involving law enforcement,” Giuliani said.
According to The Times report, however, the FBI had been
investigating Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton for some time regarding her
email server controversy prior to dedicating any resources to Trump’s team.
When the assignment came late in the election season, officials were reportedly
specifically tasked with investigating four campaign associates: Michael Flynn,
Paul Manafort, and the aforementioned Page and Papadopoulos.
Regardless of the extent of the investigation, Giuliani
expressed confidence that the FBI did not gather any evidence against the Trump
campaign.
“If there’s a spy, they got nothing from it,” he said.
Nevertheless, Giuliani suggested Comey “should be
prosecuted” if he ordered the investigation.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our
stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting
mainstream media sources. When you share to your
friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment
and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Here We Go=> Mueller Gives
Manafort Judge Unredacted Rosenstein Memo
By Cristina Laila
May 17, 2018
Robert Mueller’s office begrudgingly gave Judge T.S.
Ellis the unredacted Rosenstein memo detailing the Special Counsel’s scope in a
sealed court filing Thursday.
Reuters reported:
Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s
office notified a federal court in Virginia on Thursday it had filed under seal
an unredacted memorandum that is expected to shed light on the scope of his
wide-ranging probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Judge T.S. Ellis lost his temper a couple weeks ago in a
Manafort hearing and accused Mueller’s prosecutors of using the case against
Trump’s former campaign chairman to oust the President from office.
The Reagan-appointed judge also ordered the government to
hand over the unredacted Rosenstein memo.
The Judge told Mueller’s prosecutors, “We don’t want anyone
with unfettered power.”
Mueller’s prosecutors argued they have certain authorities
given to them which were laid out in Rosenstein’s August 2017 memo.
Judge Ellis scoffed at Mueller’s prosecutors who argued the
memo has to be kept a secret because of ongoing investigations and ordered the
unredacted memo to be released within a two week time frame.
And here we are; Judge Ellis now has the unredacted memo.
Stay tuned. The Gateway Pundit will be
reporting on Judge Ellis’ response to this memo and to Manafort’s motion to
have Mueller’s case against him dismissed.
+++++++++++++++++++
IG Report: FBI & DOJ Broke
Law In Clinton Email Investigation - Referred For Criminal Charges
IG Horowitz has found "reasonable grounds"
for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the
FBI/DOJ's handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings
of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution
By TIM BROWN
MAY 17, 2018
The Department of Justice's Inspector General has released a
report which indicated that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the DOJ
both broke the law during the probe into Hillary Clinton's illegal email
server.
The report was kept private, but The Wall Street
Journal reported:
Those invited to review the report
were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it,
people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to
craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be
incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks.
However, Former D.C. bureau chief for Investor's
Business Daily, Hoover Institution media fellow, and author of several books,
including bestseller INFILTRATION
(https://amzn.to/2Iyv2u6), Paul Sperry, tweeted out that
the IG is turning over a referral to the DOJ for possible criminal charges in
the matter.
(https://amzn.to/2Iyv2u6), Paul Sperry, tweeted out that
the IG is turning over a referral to the DOJ for possible criminal charges in
the matter.
"IG Horowitz has found "reasonable grounds"
for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the
FBI/DOJ's handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings
of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal
prosecution," he tweeted.
BREAKING: IG Horowitz has found "reasonable grounds" for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ's handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) May 17, 2018
Sperry continued, "Comey/Yates targeted Gen. Flynn in
C.I. investigation a yr BEFORE he communicated w Russian ambassador in Dec 2016
as a transition official--and the trigger was Flynn sitting at same table w
Putin at Dec 2015 Moscow event, even tho Green Party's Jill Stein also at
table."
BREAKING: Comey/Yates targeted Gen. Flynn in C.I. investigation a yr BEFORE he communicated w Russian ambassador in Dec 2016 as a transition official--and the trigger was Flynn sitting at same table w Putin at Dec 2015 Moscow event, even tho Green Party's Jill Stein also at table https://t.co/mZRLFX0nAD— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) May 17, 2018
"As the IG prepares to release his next report, Sally
Yates is suddenly animated & agitated. She is tweet-storming against Trump,
giving speeches bashing Trump, and spinning her role in the investigations in
the New York Times. Yates appears worried about something ahead of
report," Sperry added.
As the IG prepares to release his next report, Sally Yates is suddenly animated & agitated. She is tweet-storming against Trump, giving speeches bashing Trump, and spinning her role in the investigations in the New York Times. Yates appears worried about something ahead of report https://t.co/7FsSOOjl7r— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) May 17, 2018
Tyler Durden goes into detail over at Zero
Hedge on recapping what all has taken place and what is
expected to take place as a result of the report. He believes that this
is the foundation for appointing a Special Counsel.
He writes:
Once congress has reviewed the
OIG report, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees will use it to supplement
their investigations, which will result in hearings with the end goal of
requesting or demanding a Special Counsel investigation. The DOJ can appoint a
Special Counsel at any point, or wait for Congress to demand one. If
a request for a Special Counsel is ignored, Congress can pass
legislation to force an the appointment.
And while the DOJ could act on the
OIG report and investigate / prosecute themselves without a
Special Counsel, it is highly unlikely that Congress would stand for that given
the subjects of the investigation.
After the report's completion, the
DOJ will weigh in on it. Their comments are key. As TrumpSoldier points
out in his analysis, the DOJ can take various actions regarding "Policy,
personnel, procedures, and re-opening of investigations. In short, just about
everything (Immunity agreements can also be rescinded)."
...
With the wheels set in motion last
week seemingly align with Congressional requests and the OIG mandate, and
the upcoming OIG report likely to serve as a foundational opinion, the DOJ
will finally be empowered to move forward with an impartially
appointed Special Counsel.
10) The DOJ response is critical! Here Wray discusses actions that can be taken based upon the OIG Report. Policy, personnel, procedures, and re-opening of investigations. In short, just about everything. (Immunity agreements can also be rescinded) pic.twitter.com/Rf2qiXtVgm— TrumpSoldier (@DaveNYviii) January 3, 2018
The question now though is, will we ever see any justice in
the matter concerning Hillary Clinton's crimes? It's one thing to deal
with criminal activity in the DOJ and the FBI, even though it's like the fox
guarding the henhouse (https://amzn.to/2Iyv2u6). It's another to
actually deal with a woman, who we know because of the evidence we've seen and
the laws we have, who knowingly broke the law.
https://amzn.to/2Iyv2u6). It's another to
actually deal with a woman, who we know because of the evidence we've seen and
the laws we have, who knowingly broke the law.
Tim Brown is an author and
Editor at FreedomOutpost.com, SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com.
He is husband to his "more precious than rubies" wife, father of 10
"mighty arrows", jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty.
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. . Follow Tim
on Twitter.
Also check him out on Gab and Steemit
++++++++++++++++++++
WSJ Reporter: We’ve Confirmed the
Worst – US Intel Truly Was Spying on Trump Camp
Kimberley Strassel (WSJ)
& James Comey
A Wednesday piece by The New York Times which details the FBI’s
investigation into Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign may have revealed
more than intended, at least if a Wall Street Journal reporter who has covered
the surveillance previously is correct.
The Journal’s Kimberley Strassel has written about the
investigation in the past. In a piece last week, she posited that the FBI may
have used a mole in the Trump campaign, particularly given the Department of
Justice’s reluctance to turn over information about the informant to
congressional investigators.
The Times piece revealed more details about the Trump
campaign surveillance operation — called “Crossfire Hurricane” in reference to
the Rolling Stones song “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” — and just how extensive it was.
While the tenor of the article, which was written by Matt
Apuzzo, Adam Goldman and Nicholas Fandos, is overwhelmingly favorable to the
FBI and dismisses any claims that the surveillance was politically motivated, (“I
never saw anything that resembled a witch hunt or suggested that the bureau’s
approach to the investigation was politically driven,” one DOJ official is
quoted as saying) there were a few things buried deep in there that
specifically caught Strassel’s attention.
In a tweetstorm Wednesday evening, Strassel noted key problems in The Times’
narrative, particularly when the story appeared and significant facts that they
glossed over.
Strassel first argued that the article was a calculated leak
of sorts in an effort to get out ahead of House Intelligence Committee Chairman
Devin Nunes and the information that he’s gathering and releasing regarding the
FBI’s sources on the Trump investigation.
1. So a few important points on that new NYT "Hurricane Crossfire" piece. A story that, BTW, all of us following this knew had to be coming. This is DOJ/FBI leakers' attempt to get in front of the facts Nunes is forcing out, to make it not sound so bad. Don't buy it. It's bad.— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
However, she says it proves what Trump was claiming all
along: namely, that his campaign was being spied upon.
2. Biggest takeaway: Govt "sources" admit that, indeed, the Obama DOJ and FBI spied on the Trump campaign. Spied. (Tho NYT kindly calls spy an "informant.") NYT slips in confirmation far down in story, and makes it out like it isn't a big deal. It is a very big deal.— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
The story briefly mentions that “one government informant
met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos, current and former
officials said. That has become a politically contentious point, with Mr.
Trump’s allies questioning whether the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign or
trying to entrap campaign officials.”
However, if that informant met several times with two
low-level Trump campaign officials, one wonders just what his role — if any —
in the Trump campaign might have been. It seems somewhat unlikely that a random
individual outside the campaign would have had the opportunity to meet with
both George Papadopoulos and Carter Page without some suspicion being aroused
if the informant didn’t have extremely close ties to the campaign.
3. In self-serving desire to get a sympathetic story about its actions, DOJ/FBI leakers are willing to provide yet more details about that "top secret" source (namely, that spying was aimed at Page/Papadopoulos)--making all more likely/certain source will be outed. That's on them— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
4. DOJ/FBI (and its leakers) have shredded what little credibility they have in claiming they cannot comply with subpoena. They are willing to provide details to friendly media, but not Congress? Willing to risk very source they claim to need to protect?— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
Strassel then noted the fact that if the FBI is willing to
leak information that makes them look good to media sources, they shouldn’t
have any problem complying with the subpoena that the House
Intelligence Committee issued.
She also pointed out that the FBI had claimed the dossier
had little to no influence on the investigation.
5. Back in Dec., NYT assured us it was the Papadopoulos-Downer convo that inspired FBI to launch official counterintelligence operation on July 31, 2016. Which was convenient, since it diminished the role of the dossier. However . . .— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
6. Now NYT tells us FBI didn't debrief downer until August 2nd. And Nunes says no "official intelligence" from allies was delivered to FBI about that convo prior to July 31. So how did FBI get Downer details? (Political actors?) And what really did inspire the CI investigation?— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
7. As for whether to believe line that FBI operated soberly/carefully/judiciously in 2016, a main source for this judgment is, um . . .uh . . . Sally Yates. Who was in middle of it all. A bit like asking Putin to reassure that Russia didn't meddle in our election.— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
Sally Yates, for those of you with short memories, was the
deputy attorney general under former President Barack Obama.
Strassel closed with a shot at the DOJ and James Comey.
8. On that, if u r wondering who narrated this story, note paragraphs that assure everybody that hardly anybody in DOJ knew about probe. Oh, and Comey also was given few details. Nobody knew nothin'! (Cuz when u require whole story saying u behaved, it means u know you didn't.)— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) May 17, 2018
This is arguably the biggest story in quite some time. We
already knew that intelligence had been weaponized by Obama-era apparatchiks to
get a FISA court to agree to surveillance and
that the Trump dossier had been prepared using money from the Clinton campaign.
However, we’re beginning to realize it went deeper than that — and it could
have included a mole in the Trump campaign itself.
If it did, we need to know. No more of this drip-drip-drip
of information specifically designed as a limited hangout. It’s time that the
American people are appraised, once and for all, just how far the Obama
administration went in using the apparatus of the federal government to infiltrate the campaign of their political
adversary.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our
stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting
mainstream media sources. When you share to your
friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment
and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
__________________________
Deep State Crimes
Beginning to Spill
John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© May 18, 2018
________________________
Ex-US Attorney: Obama CIA
Chief Led Operation To Frame Trump
Trump: Obama FBI Spied on
Campaign, ‘Bigger Than Watergate’
WSJ Reporter: We’ve
Confirmed the Worst – US Intel Truly Was Spying on Trump Camp
_____________________
Here We Go=> Mueller
Gives Manafort Judge Unredacted Rosenstein Memo
_________________
IG Report: FBI & DOJ
Broke Law In Clinton Email Investigation - Referred For Criminal Charges
