DONATE

Showing posts with label Social Transformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Transformation. Show all posts

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Do We Dare Believe Sunni Muslims Want Justice for Murdered Christians?

Protesting Islamic Terrorism over Peshawar Church bomb-homicide
John R. Houk
© October 5, 2013

Shamim Masih is my on sight journalist that has been keeping me up to date about Pakistan’s persecution of Christians. It is through Shamim that I first heard of two Taliban homicidal-suicide bombers blowing themselves up at a very old Church – All Saints Church in Peshawar Pakistan. And it was through Shamim that a glimmer of hope for Pakistani-Christians was reported as the mood of many Muslims in Pakistan seemed to have made a journey for the acceptance of minorities that we either non-Muslim or non-Sunni.

Shamim has sent another news story publishing Muslim organizations that have come out in support of the Christian minority with many crying for the abolishment of Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws which have been the principle tool to legally persecute Christians. Before I post Shamim’s news story I want to examine some of the Muslim organizations Shamim has listed.

Majlis-e-Wahdat-e-Muslimeen (MWM)

MWM is a Shia Muslim religio-political party in Pakistan. The party is an anti-terrorism Shia Muslim representative organization advocating for an egalitarian and modern model of Islamic democratic welfare state and demanding equal rights for all the minorities in the country. It is one of the leading religious organizations in Pakistan.

History

The MWM was founded by Muhammad Amin Shaheedi and a group of Shiite Muslim clergy on August 2, 2009 in Islamabad, Pakistan. It has a prominent presence in the Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Baluchistan, Gilgit-Baltistan and in Azad Kashmir.

Ideology

MWM's agenda articulates and spells out the vision of a modern Islamic Republic that advocates individual's welfare through community's cooperation. It wants to set Pakistan on a course to political stability, social harmony, and economic prosperity for all religious, ethnic and racial communities.

Manifesto

o   The National Plan: The MWM shall give the national plan for fifty years as a result of which Pakistan will become self-sufficient in mineral resources, economics and agriculture and by which the important projects of pipelines, Thar coalfield and Gwadar port will go to completion.

o   National Defense and Integrity: The MWM would let no harm on the sovereignty and integrity of Pakistan at any cost. According to the global and regional requirements, the vocational abilities of the army will be enhanced and the soldiers of the Pakistan Army will be kept away from the foreign conflicts. Atomic assets of Pakistan are the defensive deterrents for the protection and evolution of which, every possible steps will be taken. The MWM will combat the terrorism by depriving away the terrorists from political, social and economical support and by bringing the terrorists to the statutory clutches.

o   Administrative Structure: The MWM will provide Gilgit-Baltistan the constitutional rights and an absolute provincial status. The MWM will ensure the representation of Gilgit-Baltistan in the senate. The MWM will form the new provinces in Pakistan on the management basis instead of ethnic basis. The MWM will provide the tribal areas a provincial status and fundamental rights and will bring an end to the tribal system in the light of their traditions and regulations. The MWM will make Gilgit-Baltistan, Swat Valley and Naran, Kaghan Valley the international center for tourism and minerals.

o   Judiciary: The MWM will rebuild the entire judicial system and base the judicial system on the Islamic laws as prescribed by the Holy Quran. According to the new legislation, the constitutional documents will be again prepared. As well as those Islamic states that have good experience in this regard, their experience will be also utilized. The MWM will also ensure the protection, honor and autonomy of the judiciary. Quick, easy and free access to the justice will be made possible for the public. The judiciary will be independent in finance and management. The rich, the poor, the citizen, the villager, the one who is aware of the judicial matters, the one who is unaware or uneducated will be equal in the eyes of the constitution and no individual shall be granted legal immunity. The MWM will set an institution within the judiciary that will investigate the causes and factors of the crimes and the offenses from a closer look. (Wikipedia Excerpts)

Jammat-e-Islami (JI)

Jamaat-e-Islami (also written Jamaat-i-Islami or abbreviated JI) is Pakistan's oldest religious party. The JI ranks among the leading and most influential Islamic revivalist movements and the first of its kind to develop an ideology based on the modern revolutionary conception of Islam in the contemporary world.

JI's intellectual inspiration primarily came from thoughts of Maulana Sayyid Abul A'la Maududi, who along with the great thinker poet Dr. Mohammed Iqbal, set the pace for contemporary Muslim thinking in the South Asian sub-continent. JI was established in Lahore on August 26, 1941 (in the Islamic calendar (sic) that date was 2 Sha'ban, 1360 AH).

The Jamaat established close relations with conservative Muslim governments and organizations in the Middle East, particularly with Saudi Arabia. Close relations between the Jamaat and the Saudi monarchy were instrumental in arranging Saudi aid for Pakistan's purchase of F-16s. And Saudi subsidies to the Afghan Mujahideen were channeled through the Jamaat‘a relief program. The Jamaat alone among Pakistan‘s political and religious groups was given considerable scope for operation among the Afghans. Throughout its history, the Jamaat maintained its connections with the Muslim Brotherhood and other conservative Islamic organizations in other countries.

…

Jamaat leaders wanted to see society based on lslamie (sic) ideals more compatible with their own strict interpretation in order that their party can survive beyond Zia's tenure. The Zia regime must strike a balance between exploiting Jamaat assistance and maintaining its distance from the Jamaat lest it share in the dislike that much of the Pakistani public feels toward the Jamaat.

…

In its endeavours to propagate Islamic thought and to work for the cause of the Muslims around the world, JI developed and maintained close brotherly relations with the Islamic movements and missions working in different continents and countries. …

…

The three main goals outlined in the party's manifesto are:

o   To be obedient to Allah

o   To free people from lives of hypocrisy, contradiction, and the dichotomy of word and action; one should be true to ones claim and thus live like a true Muslim

o   To end the influence of the proponents of falsehood, the sinful, and non-practicing Muslims, from prevalent system of life, and in place, transfer the leadership from both theoretical and practical point of views, to those who are true believers and pious ones (GlobalSecurity.org Excerpts)

Pakistan Sunni Tehreek

Sunni Tehreek is a Muslim political organization described by Western institutions as representing ultraradical and anti-Christian, anti-Shi'ite beliefs.[1] The organization was founded in Pakistan in 1990 to promote the interests of the Barelvi movement in conflicts against the competing Deobandi and Ahl al-Hadith movements.[2][3] (Wikipedia – READ THE REST)

The Sunni Tehreek is now a political party and is set to commence its politicial (sic) activities as the “Pakistan Sunni Tehreek” at its public rally at the Minar-e-Pakistan in Lahore on March 23 (Pakistan Day), the religious group’s chief Sarwat Ejaz Qadri said on Sunday. Addressing the ‘Pakistan Bachao Jaan Nisaran-e-Mustafa Conference’ at Nishtar Park, Qadri said his new political party would contest the next general elections. He said people talked about a “tsunami of music” and “tsunami of false beliefs”, but the Sunni Tehreek had brought the “tsunami of Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)’s lovers”. Regarding his party’s manifesto, he said if the Sunni Tehreek came into power, it would work for the poor people’s welfare and for ridding Pakistan of extremism. “We have no foreign accounts, and the Prophet (PBUH)’s lovers are our greatest assets,” the party chief added. … (See more at: Sunni Tehreek is now a political party; 1/30/12 7:50 am)

Jamait-e-Ulema Islam (F)

ISLAMABAD:
 
While the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) wants to transform Pakistan into an Islamic welfare state, analysts raised concerns over mentions of Jihad in its manifesto and differences between the document’s Urdu and English versions.

In the sixth seminar of its series, the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) hosted a discussion on the JUI-F manifesto in Islamabad on Thursday.

Political analyst Hassan Khan pointed out a stark contrast in the contents of JUI-F’s Urdu and English manifestos.

“The English version is more enlightened and inclusive, while the Urdu version has conventional religious undertones,” Khan said.

He noted that the chapter on Sharia was missing in the English version while a chapter on women rights was missing in the Urdu version.

JUI-F Deputy Secretary-General Malik Sikandar Khan said the party had pledged to make Pakistan an Islamic welfare state.

He said JUI-F would transform the current system by making changes in accordance with Islamic laws.

Khan referred to the welfare state model under Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and during Hazrat Umer’s rule and added that society made socio-economic and cultural progress when Islamic laws were implemented in true spirit. “The state will ensure the provision of every citizen’s basic needs and ensure that their safety is ensure,” Khan said. Analyst and TV anchor Saleem Safi appreciated JUI-F’s willingness to work with liberal and progressive political parties, but advised the party to focus its energy on implementing its own manifesto’s points.

Safi raised questions as to how the JUI-F would abolish interest-based banking; questions which went largely unanswered.

He also criticised the mention of compulsory Jihadi training in the manifesto, arguing that such actions would only create more chaos in society. (JUI-F’s election plan: English, Urdu versions of manifesto termed incongruent; By Our Correspondent; The Express Tribune; 4/19/13)

Ahle-Sunnat Wal Jamaat

JHANG — The hard-line Sunni Muslim cleric may have been defeated at polls five years ago, but he’s confident of winning a seat in Pakistan’s election Saturday.

A terrorist to his enemies, a man of peace to his supporters, Maulana Ahmad Ludhianvi heads the country’s largest anti-Shiite group, which has been described as the political wing of terror group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.

He is part of a coalition led by cleric Sami-ul-Haq, nicknamed Father of the Taliban, having been dumped by the election frontrunners Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) in favor of his arch rivals, the local feudal Akram family.

…

His Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (ASWJ) movement denies any link to violence, despite being known as the political arm of LeJ, one of the most active terror groups in Pakistan, bent on exterminating its 20 percent Shiite minority.

LeJ claimed responsibility for the two worst bomb attacks so far this year, killing 182 in Shiite areas of southwestern city Quetta. It is also linked to Al-Qaeda. Rights groups say attacks on Shiites hit a record high in 2012.

… (A terrorist or a man of peace? Saudi Gazette; Last updated 5/6/13 10:38 AM)

Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) currently operating with new name of Ahlesunnat wal Jamaat is a Deobandi Pakistani organization, and a formerly registered Pakistani political party. Established in the early 1980s in Jhang by Maulana Haq Nawaz Jhangvi, its stated goal is to primarily to deter major Shiite influence in Pakistan in the wake of the Iranian Revolution.[1][2] The organization was banned by President Pervez Musharraf in 2002 as a terrorist organization under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997.[1][2] Currently the organization's official name is Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, but it is still widely referred to as Sipah-e-Sahaba by its own members.[3] In March 2012 the government of Pakistan banned Sipah-e-Sahaba.[4]

Ideology

The SSP follows the Deobandi. It wishes for Pakistan to be a Deobandi state and has declared Shiites non-Muslims.[5] The organization also calls for a restoration of the Khilafat.[2]


These organizations that Shamim writes about as showing solidarity with Pakistan’s Christian minority. Frankly the history of these organizations is a demonstration of Islamic Radicalism. I prayerfully join Shamim that Pakistan’s Islamic Supremacist hatred of non-Muslims has begun to transform for the better. And in Shamim’s case the Sunni hatred toward Christians. Living in America the cry for justice for the Christians killed in Peshawar may be a bit ephemeral.

JRH 10/5/13
************************************
Christian Welcomes Religious Parties’ Condemnation

By Shamim Masih
Sent: 10/1/2013 2:52 PM

ISLAMABAD: The religious parties across the country condemn the twin suicide bombings at a church in Peshawar which left at least 100 people dead on Sunday. Condemning the attack on the Christian community during a Mass, the Majlis-e-Wahdat-e-Muslimeen (MWM), the Jammat-e-Islami (JI), the Pakistan Sunni Tehreek, the Jamait-e-Ulema Islam- (F) and the Ahle-Sunnat Wal Jamaat condemned the deadly attack. They demanded that the government should provide full protection to the minorities which is their constitutional right.  These parties demanded that compensation should be paid immediately to the families of those who had lost their loved ones.

They said the government should also bear all the costs of treatment given to the people injured free of charge.

Human Rights Activists and Christian politicians across the country welcomed the positive change in religious parties. Safdar Chaudhry Secretary General, Rah-e-Nijat Ministry said in his statement that it is good that religious parties have extended hands towards Christians. He said he warmly welcomes these statements by religious leadership against terrorist attack on Christians.

Basharat Khokher, human rights activist said that with the help of the local administration, we have been able to control the situation created by some fanatic in Iqbal Town, Islamabad. He said that it is encouraging that Islamabad police and local administration is keen to take care of the Christians living in slum areas while registration process of these areas. He said that it is good sign that Shia people have announced three day mourning across the country.

Earlier, Tahir Naveed Chaudhry appreciates the arrest of killers of Shahbaz Bhatti. He said the government should take solid steps in protecting Christians across the country.

Christian leaders across the country welcome the statements from the people of different thoughts but with the same massage. Already, President of Pakistan Tehreek e Insaf, Javed Hashmi has spoken logically and emphatically against the blasphemy law in the National Assembly. Simultaneously, the government will have to take concrete measures to empower non-Muslims through application of Article 226 of the constitution, and amendments in the blasphemy law.

Be Blessed,
Shamim Masih
___________________
Do We Dare Believe Sunni Muslims Want Justice for Murdered Christians?
John R. Houk
© October 5, 2013
____________________
Christian Welcomes Religious Parties’ Condemnation

© Shamim Masih

Shamim Masih
Snapshot of Human Rights Activism from 2011
Christian Rights Activist
Freelance Journalist 
Secretary General
Shamim Masih’s Donate/Support info:

FOR USD TRANSFER.
Intermediary Bank:                         MASHREQ BANK, NEW YORK
Intermediary Bank SWIFT BIC:         MSHQUS33
Beneficiary Bank:                         JS BANK LIMITED
Beneficiary Bank SWIFT BIC:                 JSBLPKKA
Bank A/c # at Intermediary bank:         70008227
Title Of a/c                                Shamim Masih
Beneficiary Account Number:                 405527

Top of Form
IBAN #                                        pk80jsbl9530000000405227


FOR GBP TRANSFER.
Intermediary Bank:                         MASHREQ BANK, LONDON
Intermediary Bank SWIFT BIC:         MSHQGB2L
Beneficiary Bank:                         JS BANK LIMITED
Beneficiary Bank SWIFT BIC:                 JSBLPKKA
Bank A/c # at Intermediary bank:         00010855
Title Of a/c                                Shamim Masih
Beneficiary Account Number:                 405527
IBAN #                                        pk80jsbl9530000000405227



FOR EURO TRANSFER.
Intermediary Bank:                         MASHREQ BANK, LONDON
Intermediary Bank SWIFT BIC:         MSHQGB2L
Beneficiary Bank:                         JS BANK LIMITED
Beneficiary Bank SWIFT BIC:                 JSBLPKKA
Bank A/c # at Intermediary bank:         10847
Title Of a/c                                Shamim Masih
Beneficiary Account Number:                 405527
IBAN #                                        pk80jsbl9530000000405227

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Who Prevails in the NWO Struggle for Dominance?

Family Ties - MB and Soros
John R. Houk
© September 26, 2013

Danny Jeffrey writes about a letter exchange between himself and some like-minded friends in the UK. The theme of this post is that Leftists (Danny uses ‘Progressives’) have an agenda to control the world, George Soros is the felicitator-in-chief of this agenda AND Soros is using Islamic hatred to further chaos globally to create the conditions for global Leftist hegemony.

I have to tell you that Danny’s predictions make a lot of sense. I just am not sure if I am on board lock, stock and barrel. I believe the Left has a global agenda to transform the world into a society of top-to-bottom governance with the ruling elite telling the people what is moral and good along with the concept of spreading the wealth. Except the wealth will probably be spread among the ruling and intellectual elite while the rest of humanity will have their minds numbed into complacent dependence to the directives of the ruling elite.

Danny considers Islam and its followers to be a mere unwitting tool of the Leftist agenda as directed by puppeteer George Soros. And you know, I believe Soros at the very least in clandestine mode has the intention to use Islam as a tool. However, I am completely certain the rabid followers of the Quran, Hadith and the Sira believe that the Western Left is the tool of Islam. Islam has honed their craft of civilizational transformation over nearly a 1500 year history. The Western Left began to develop their theories of utopia in the early to mid-1800s. Karl Marx managed to stamp a One World Order international agenda. Lenin and Stalin took the stamp to use military force to encourage little national revolutions to move toward a Leftist utopia – uh – Russian style. Soviet Marxism unwittingly unleashed Mao Zedong’s oriental form of Marxism which had developed its own thoughts on global hegemony.

Western Capitalism – especially American Capitalism – proved to be too competitive with the Soviet and Maoist paradigm as money plus resources buried the USSR paradigm into collapse. And Communist China was forced to develop a Market-Socialist paradigm vastly divergent from the original theories of Marx, Engels and Lenin. The true downfall of the Marxist Utopian paradigm is the proven fact of those Communist regimes slaughtering tens of millions of their own people to eliminate dissent and brainwash their populations.

The irony is that the deadly Communist path to transform the thought processes of those they governed was perfected by Islam under the guidance of Mohammed and Islam’s earliest Caliphs. The combination of Islamic Supremacism (absolute submission to the principles of Islam) and dhimmitude transformed the people subjected to Muslim conquest. The conquered non-Muslims lived under three absolute directives:

1)      Convert to Islam becoming a part of the global Ummah.

2)     Choose to keep their religious faith (initially only offered to Jews and Christians as people of the Book) but live in oppressive dhimmi submission to the laws of Islam (viz., Sharia Law). As Muslim rulers realized the utter destruction of polytheists and other non-people of the Book (e.g. Zoroastrians) would diminish the exploitation to Muslim coffers. So even a harsher standard of dhimmitude was offered. Just imagine of the slaughter of India’s Hindus until dhimmitude was extended.

3)     No submission to Islam meant death.

Is it possible that Lenin, Stalin and Mao studied Islamic history? Civilizations, Cultures and Societies experience unwanted transformation through brutality.

Danny Jeffrey believes the Leftist transformationists under the nefarious guidance of George Soros is in the driver’s seat. And as I said his reasoning is fairly solid. Nonetheless, history often turns on a dime. It is entirely possible that Caliphate-minded Radical Muslims will cooperate with a Soros agenda until Muslim blood thirst turns on Soros.

Obviously Soros’ Western resources outweigh the hardly united Radical Muslim movements. Unfortunately Radical Muslims have been rather creative in developing ways to kill people with far less resources. Just think how creative Radical Muslims could be if the Soros perceived chaos tool of Islam acquires more sophisticated violent tools via an enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend temporary union (Muslims would call it a Hudna).

Where Danny is certain that Soros is the top dog with a New World Order agenda, I am more willing to see both the Soros-Left and Radical Muslim view each other as useful tools.

Of course I also believe a NWO is coming that has nothing to do with despotic Leftist utopianism or a global Islamic Caliphate. The Jesus that both those sides hate will come in the clouds and defeat them both at His Second Coming in which ultimately Jesus the Christ will reign over the New Earth and the New Heaven. I read the end of the Good Book. I know how it ends I just don’t know how it gets to the end.

J
JRH 9/26/13
_________________________
THE SOROS AGENDA-MOVING RIGHT ALONG

By Danny Jeffrey
September 24, 2013

Since first logging onto the internet some years ago I have encountered many fine people whom I have never actually met, and yet regard them as dear friends. The internet has given me the power to connect with like minded people around the world, and thankfully there are many out there. Yes, without a doubt, I have encountered a few abject fools as well, but fortunately they are few and far between as I waste no time debating liberals.

I have had the good fortune of being invited to join a rather unique collection of individuals in a group that is based in London, with members scattered worldwide. Lately I have had a running debate with some of my fellow members as they all reside in places with a burgeoning population of Muslims, and in their eyes Islam is the greatest danger that the Western nations face. I disagree, believing that Progressivism is, and that Islam is but a tool they are utilizing in the pursuit of power. A tool, I might add, that will be greatly reduced in numbers should the Progressives succeed in their goals.
Needless to say, I am outnumbered, but not necessarily outgunned, and cannot help but feel that we all gain from our discussions. I am convinced that the different views that we have stem from the fact that we view world issues from a different perspective. England, unfortunately, is being overrun by Muslims, who are draining the economy and demanding that our English cousins cater to their twisted 'religion'. Meanwhile, we here in America are far more aware that the fundamental changes promised by Obama are being enacted by the master puppeteer George Soros, and his followers.


That is not to say that England has far more than their share of Progressives as well. Their media is not even allowed to mention the term 'Muslim' when writing of criminal activities. They are restricted to a far less descriptive term of 'Asians', or 'Youths'.


Yes, Progressivism is alive and well in jolly old London town. The difference is that George Soros has a greater hands on approach in the U.S. knowing that when we collapse, the rest of the Western nations will follow suit. Consequently when American foresee danger they see the hand of Soros at work. When a citizen of the U.K. perceive a problem they see encroaching Muslims, demanding their 'rights', and prepping for civil discord.


Recently I wrote an essay entitled 'Egypt-Soros-The Real Plan Is Far Worse Than The Brotherhood' (Listed below in Suggested Reading) and it broke all existing records of anything that I have ever written before. One of my friends in London read that essay and several others that I had written and contacted me stating that he was 'confused' and asked me to clarify certain points that I had brought out.


Believe me, nothing confuses that man. He is simply too polite, being the English gentleman that he is, to put it like an American and tell me to provide some hard evidence if I wanted him to believe what I had written. And so, I set out to provide further information.


A great deal of the problem is that the people of the U.K. and Europe are simply not aware of the fact that Obama does not, and cannot, and is not allowed to think on his own. He is owned, lock, stock, and barrel, by George Soros and his fellow power masters. Actually I believe the same thing could be said about the politicians of England but the connection is less apparent.


The following, which is virtually an essay in its self, and why I am publishing it is a slightly edited version of the evidence that I sent to my friend. Several points in it are in reference to earlier contacts between us and should still be apparent in the context that you read it.


The letter to my friend:


Back when I first wrote about the Egyptian revolution that was then in progress, I attributed it to the machinations of George Soros. A funny thing happened. A week later Glenn Beck did a show on exactly that, and a friend named Shelley commented that he had copied my thoughts to the letter. I told her to write it off as a coincidence as he and his staff had simply come to the same conclusion as I.
Recently another funny thing happened. I wrote the essay you refer to and, lo and behold, a week later Glenn Beck did a show on exactly the same thing. He naturally went into more detail as I try to limit my essays to six to ten minutes reading while he has an hour to work, but he promoted the exact same concept.


I am not accusing Mister Beck of plagiarism. He does what he does and he does it well. He often uses the material revealed by David Horowitz, Trevor Louden, Frank Gaffney and others. I feel honored that he picked up on my thoughts on two separate occasions and put them before millions. Getting the word out is what it is all about, but someone on his staff does indeed read some of my material. That pleases me.


And now I shall try to dispel some of that 'confusion'.


When Soros gets up and promotes the lunacy of Karl Popper and his open society ideas he manages to look like a fool to you, as he should. You see through the Progressive veil and will not be led, but most of the others in that auditorium were probably quite captivated with the nonsense he promoted.


I see Soros as a diabolical genius for several reasons.


One is his ability to read trends in the market and capitalize on those trends. Profits thus accumulated have given him such leverage that he can now influence those trends. This ability has led to his enormous wealth and, being the diabolical bastard that he is ole Georgie has managed to finance his every evil whim.


His use of Non-Profit groups is a stroke of pure genius. Such groups allow him to greatly leverage his own investments. He ennobles his fiendish plot with high sounding titles such as "The International Crisis Group". Now that sounds like he is trying to curtail crisis worldwide and bring unicorns and rainbows to the human race, while in fact he is generating crisis. Due to such groups and their titles, many organizations, both religious and secular, wealthy individuals, and western nations, gladly contribute. Also, Non-Profits also allow him to dispense with most of the money trail normally imposed on other organizations.


I would like to answer points you brought up in your comment in the order you mentioned them but perhaps a timeline of events would be more effective.

First off, George Soros has long been a regular guest at the White House. Back on October 28, 2010, Bill O'Reilly reported that since Obama had taken office in 2009 Soros had visited the White House at least four times.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/transcript/why-president-obama-meeting-george-soros-far-left-bloggers

This is more recent from Daniel Greenfield, via Front Page Mag:"George Soros has leased the White House as a summer home for eight years, and appointed a number of his stooges to Cabinet positions, including Chief of Staff. It’s a great triumph for the wanted criminal who has gone from collaborating with the Nazis to controlling the greatest country in the world."

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-campaign-merges-with-george-soros/

The Chief of Staff that is mentioned is Denis Mcdonough

Also from FPM:

"Denis McDonough’s appointment as Chief of Staff is probably the biggest win for the Soros Lobby since the Obama victory. Denis McDonough was a Senior Fellow at the George Soros funded Center for American Progress, which is the criminal brain behind the Frankenbody of Obama Inc."

New White House Chief of Staff Blamed Mo Video, Called for a World Where Islam is not Disrespected




This image was not included in the letter but take a close look at it. Obama is doing his natural waving at his fans. Denis BHO & Chief of Staff Denis McDonough 2008McDonough is not waving. That man is a control freak, and he is in control. Now back to the letter:

It must be an awkward situation to be President and presumably the most powerful man in the world and have to have to take orders from a so called subordinate who is the mouthpiece of the true ruler of America. But, there is something very revealing in that headline. Why is Soros promoting Islam, if not to spread chaos as I have suggested. Surely he is not planning to convert in his old age.


From the very beginning of Obama's reign his advisers were chosen by the powers that be. He brought a few cronies with him from Chicago. They have returned to the Windy City and now he is surrounded only by Soros loyalists.

You point out, quite rightly, that the visitors log at the White House reveals all who have been there. That is true and Soros is a regular, along with many from the MB, as well as some who are on a No-Fly list.
From NBC we have this:

Obama Blocks List of Visitors to White House

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/31373407/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-blocks-list-visitors-white-house/#.Uj6B7oYqiOY

Soros and Obama do communicate on a regular basis and even when that it not practicable we have one of Soros' attaches, Samantha Power, to tell Hussein what to do. This power she wields was well demonstrated when the Joint Chiefs of Staff told Obama that we had no reason to intervene in Libya. These are people that the President should listen to; however...

Obama's Women Advisers Pushed War Against Libya

Not in the same sense as Israel, but Egypt has been a long standing, westernized, ally of the U.S... Soros lacks an army with which to confront America and Israel, but he is hell bent on destroying both nations, both financially and internationally, and he wants an army of his own, namely hate filled Muslims.

Controlling Egypt while still taking money from our empty coffers to support that Arab nation will hurt the U.S... Controlling passage in the Suez Canal, now that is another way to add to this Nazi collaborator's power. Soros is famous for his hatred of Jews in general and Israel in particular, and all weapons reaching Hamas do so via Egypt and the Sinai. Egypt's strategic location is a lynchpin in the Middle East. They can enable the flow of weapons and disable the flow of commerce. Sounds custom made for a master of chaos.

A little tidbit of information: Did you know that Clinton's daughter was married at Soros' daughter's estate? George Soros is far more powerful than people in Europe and the U.K. can imagine. He controls the entire Democratic Party and a great deal of the GOP as well. Even the diehard republicans in D.C. who will warn of Islam and financial ruin are afraid to bring up Soros' involvement in our national debates, but folks like David Horowitz and Frank Gaffney discuss it openly. They are both well aware of the Progressive/Islamic alliance and the mutual goals of both groups.

http://nation.foxnews.com/chelsea-clinton/2010/07/30/juicy-details-about-chelsea-clinton-wedding

One more tidbit before getting back to Egypt. Trevor Louden is one of the finest investigative journalists in the world and he discovered Van Jones to be a communist working in the White House. Glenn Beck learned of this and proceeded to make Van Jones a common name in every household. Political pressure forced Jones to retire from his appointed Green Czar position and go to work for The Center For American Progress, founded by John Podesta and funded by none other than Soros. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress

Now, on to the Egyptian revolution/election.
We all know that the Muslim Brotherhood had been banned in Egypt and most of the nations of the world, for good reason I might add. It was that infamous Cairo speech by Hussein Obama and brought them back onto the world stage. The goal was not for them to rule Egypt. They were only meant to be foot soldiers in creating chaos in the Middle East. This is one of the few times that Soros has been outmaneuvered; not by the MB but by millions of Egyptians who wanted hope and change. They rejected ElBaradei and his more liberal western philosophy and empowered the Brotherhood, and they soon learned, the hard way.
For the next year ElBaradei was still leading the opposition, sowing discord wherever he could because the master plan did call for him gaining control of Egypt and its strategic location. One year and the masses were once again calling for change, giving Morsi the bum's rush.


As for Morsi, he was simply the waste product that floated to the surface when the septic tank of Islam was opened in Egypt. He just happened to be elected and deposed, not by Soros but the people of Egypt. Now, as soon as the military took over and removed Morsi from office they were planning to make ElBaradei the interim President. Why? Because Soros said so.


Obama had nothing to do with deposing Morsi, but was happy it happened, after all, the puppet master had other plans. Hussein continued to pay lip service to the MB as they are essential in future plans for the region but Obama was glad to see Morsi tossed under the bus, just another "bump in the road", so to speak.


In Egypt, the ultimate power comes from the military. Muslims can only live under either a dictator or a theocracy. Soros has a vast control of the military commanders in Egypt, else why would they have proposed ElBaradei as their first choice for interim President?


Running into severe opposition, that idea was shelved and Prime Minister suggested. That too met obstacles and so Vice President was the ultimate appointment...He had to keep his name before the public.

ElBaradei is no simpleton. He knows full well that Egypt must be governed with an iron fist, and when he gains power he will not find blood shed to be so distasteful. His resigning in protest of the military's confrontation with the MB was a stroke of pure genius. This, was staged for the sake of the coming election. It establishes him as a man of peace, serving all the people, and he will gain much of the militant vote by this action. His resigning comes with an insignificant penalty clause, well worth paying:

'Ateeq said that, if found guilty, ElBaradeai could face a three year prison sentence. But a judicial source said the maximum sentence in a case of this kind was a fine and a suspended jail term. ElBaradei left Egypt this week for Europe and is unlikely to attend any hearing in the case.'

http://news.yahoo.com/egypts-elbaradei-faces-court-betrayal-trust-210219469.html
ElBaradei has long served Soros in the International Crisis Group and left the group to concentrate on Egypt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_ElBaradei#International_Crisis_Group

Kofi Annan, ex Secretary General of the U.N. is still a member of the board of trustees of the ICG.

http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/about/board.aspx

Obama is not a member. He serves Soros from the oval office.

What do these men have in common? An allegiance to George Soros and Peace Prizes. Soros is very generous with his influence in Norway.

The ICG is worth VERY serious investigation. This from Discover The Networks:

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6218

How deep does this Soros cancer go? It has metastasized.


The Benghazi debacle occurred over a year ago and the public cries out for justice. None will be found! The Accountability Review Board (ARB) is headed up by Ret. Admiral Mike Mullen and Thomas Pickering; an interesting scenario to say the least.

Mike Mullen is nothing less than a traitorous Progressive. He supports the Obama plan to withdraw from Pakistan and also supports a future agenda, most likely in Syria.

"Quite the contrary,” he said. “We will have at our disposal the great bulk of the surge forces throughout this — and most of the next — fighting season.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/mullen-backs-obamas-afghanistan-plan-2011-6#ixzz2ffZDaI1H
Covering for Obama, Mullen denies that a 'Stand Down' order was ever issued during the attack. He supplants reality with a more politically correct posture informing Congress that a 'Hold in place' order was given.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/09/19/Adm-Mullen-Denies-Stand-Down-Order-Given-Admits-Special-Ops-Told-to-Hold-in-Place

Let us check on Mullen's associate Thomas Pickering, a name that sounds alarm bells with me for I have often encountered him in my investigations of Soros' International Crisis Group. Small world isn't it?

Yes, it would seem that he is chairman of the board.

While once again on the ICG, there is one man whom I find to be totally fascinating, Gareth Evans, who is pretty much under the radar. Even Discover The Networks, does not have a file on him, but this is one dangerous man. I have written extensively on 'Responsibility to Protect' and how one day it will become a tool to use against Israel. This man is the brains behind that U.N. initiative.

'R2P focuses on preventing and halting four crimes: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing, which it places under the generic umbrella term of mass atrocity crimes.[3]'

R2P was called upon to support the 'civilians' attacking Qaddafi, thus aiding Al Qaeda and toppling Libya. Now John McCain and Lindsey Graham want it once again enacted in support of AQ in Syria, and yet we hear nothing from them or the ICG calling for protecting the Christians of Egypt and Syria who face massacre on a daily basis.

You are quite correct in stating that the powers that be in Egypt are far more interested in their own problems than the possible invasion of Israel but when ElBaradei manages to get elected, those problems will disappear like magic. Morsi was a mindless fool incapable of running a nation and so he was given time to play his hand. Our support of him gained favor with the MB and caused the average Egyptian to scorn America. Now the stage is set to empower Soros via ElBaradei, man of peace, leader of a people; harsh dictator to be. Just one election to go and if Soros prevails, and I believe he will, he becomes Pharaoh.

He has come a long way since he was a fourteen year old collaborator for the Nazis.


---------------

And so ended the letter. I am hoping that it does manage to clarify all of the issues in question.
The world has long held the U.S. in awe and has looked to the President as the most powerful man in the world. It is only natural that anyone in another nation would question some of the premises I put forth in the essay below, but we who live in America are well aware that we have indeed been transformed and many of us are equally aware of the fact that our so called President is but a smooth talking sock puppet with no power of his own.

One fact remains certain. A collapse is coming, and when it does it will be far worse in the U.K. than here. During World War II England absorbed the wrath of the Nazis allowing us time to prepare. When World War III begins, they are already heavily infiltrated by Muslims. It is no real wonder that they fear Islam while we fear the Progressives, but it is the Progressives who are writing the laws that empower the followers of Allah, and they are the ones manipulating all of the unrest in the Middle East.

Suggested Reading...
_______________________
Who Prevails in the NWO Struggle for Dominance?
John R. Houk
© September 26, 2013
________________________
THE SOROS AGENDA-MOVING RIGHT ALONG

FREEDOM RINGS 1776 is a conservative voice, defending the views of those who still believe in the constitution and opposing any and all who would lead us from our tried and true beliefs. We who still believe in the spirit of 1776 must oppose anyone who would set this nation on a course that will fundamentally transform America.

Danny Jeffrey