John R. Houk, Blog Editor
May 18, 2024
Are you still reading/seeing/hearing the mRNA Jab
is “Safe & Effective”? God help YOU! Are you still believing “Safe &
Effective”?
If you answered “yes” to any of those questions, 300 PAGES
of revealed emails from the doctors and scientists who bombarded the Public
with the deceptive aphorism – “Trust The Science” – should help
you KNOW THE TRUTH. Unless of course, you have become too hopelessly
BRAINWASHED. Then again, GOD HELP YOU!
If I were you, I’d trust the documentation more than those
purporting to represent science.
JRH 5/18/24
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR
generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements income by selling
healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of-individual, buy some healthy, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
****************************
300 Pages of Emails Leave No Doubt: Fauci, NIH Knew Early
on of Injuries, Deaths After COVID Shots
According to documents obtained by Children’s Health
Defense, reports of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines — including
a child injured by the Pfizer vaccine during a clinical trial and a fatal
vaccine-induced case of myocarditis — reached NIH researchers, Dr. Anthony
Fauci and others in 2021 and 2022.
Fauci KNEW mRNA Injures
(The Defender Photo)
May 16, 2024
Several adverse event reports from people injured by the
COVID-19 vaccines reached National Institutes of Health (NIH) researchers in
2021 and 2022 — including a report of a child injured by the Pfizer-BioNTech
vaccine during a clinical trial, according to documents
obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).
The documents also include reports of vaccine-injured people
who were suicidal and emails sent to government officials — including Dr.
Anthony Fauci — by a COVID-19 vaccine
injury victim frustrated with the Countermeasures
Injury Compensation Board’s (CICP) slow pace of responding to
their vaccine
injury claims.
As reports of vaccine injuries came in, the agency advised
one injured person that it was “not prudent” to get a second dose.
Some researchers cited a lack of knowledge about vaccine
injuries due to the rapid speed at which they were developed.
The 300-page batch of documents
released to CHD on April 21 contains emails between the NIH
and people reporting COVID-19
vaccine injuries. CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA)
request in November 2022.
On April 12, 2023, CHD
sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH did not
respond to the request.
In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH
agreed to produce
up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per
month. This month’s batch also revealed that Fauci and
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
officials knew of serious COVID-19 vaccine adverse events as
early as December 2020.
‘No doubt in my mind that the vaccine caused’ girl’s
injuries
In emails sent to NIH researchers Farinaz Safavi,
M.D., Ph.D., Dr. Avindra Nath and
Amanda Wiebold starting May 24, 2021 (pages 237-243), the parents of a girl
injured during the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial detailed their
daughter’s condition.
Nath-Safavi-Pfizer-Trial - Redacted Email (The Defender Photo)
Symptoms initially included “severe muscle/nerve pain,
painful electric shocks down her neck and spine which caused her to walk
hunched over, severe chest pain that felt like her heart was being pulled out,”
pain in her toes, a fever and “severe abdominal pain.”
According to the email, the symptoms “persisted” and new
symptoms developed, including “the inability to swallow food or liquids,”
“unexplained painful cysts on her vagina and then her head,” “erratic blood
pressure, and heart rate, memory loss, brain fog, verbal and motor tics,
fainting/seizures (10+ a day), loss of feeling from the waist down then
paralysis of her legs, inability to walk,” tinnitus, vision problems and
others.
These injuries led to nine ER visits and three hospital
admissions. According to the email, the girl developed “medical PTSD” from
“this experience with doctors, especially in the ER and Pfizer Vaccine Trial,
doubting her and treating her like a mental patient.”
“There is no doubt in my mind that the vaccine caused this,”
the email read.
In a May 25, 2021, response, Nath said, “It is hard to make
a diagnosis over emails” but “We have certainly heard of a lot of cases of
neurological complications form [sic] the vaccine,” offering to speak to the
girl’s neurologist.
On May 26, 2021, the girl’s parents said specialists they
visited had “an unconscious bias” and, “from the beginning” at the hospital
that hosted the trial, “no one was even willing to talk about the vaccine as
the trigger for this.”
In a May 27, 2021 email, the girl’s parents added that
inpatient rehabilitation doctors “were not willing” to speak with Nath. “They
are unwilling to look any further into this because then they would have to
admit the vaccine caused her reaction.” But no further reply from Nath or other
NIH officials appears in the documents.
‘It would not be prudent to receive the second dose’
In a Jan. 22, 2021, email (pages 162-163), a vaccine-injured
person contacted Dr.
Alkis Togias, branch chief of Allergy, Asthma, and Airway Biology
at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, after having
“ended up in the ER” following an anaphylactic
reaction after the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19
vaccine.
“I had never had severe reactions to anything, until the
last year, when I have had three,” the individual wrote, asking Togias if it
was safe to receive the second dose.
In his Jan. 23, 2021, reply, Togias said, “It would be very
hard … to offer an opinion as to whether you experienced a true allergic
reaction.” “If what you experienced was a true allergic reaction, it would not
be prudent to receive the second dose.”
In a March 24, 2021, follow-up email (page 175), Togias
admitted “There is no study that I am aware of that has carefully followed
people who had a reaction to the first shot and received the second shot. As a
result of this lack of knowledge, I do not think that anybody can advise you
with major certainty as to whether to proceed with the 2nd dose.”
“If you fulfill the criteria for a severe allergic reaction
as defined in the CDC
guideline … you should not be receiving the second dose,”
Togias added. He also noted that “the lack of clear answers to your questions
reflects our lack of knowledge,” which he said “is not surprising given the
speed at which these vaccines came out.”
In another instance, someone contacted Togias on Feb. 24,
2021 (pages 289-290), informing him of “a pretty scary reaction” to the first
dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine “within one hour of getting it.”
“This was a frightening occurrence, and I suspect it was a
mild anaphylactic shock,” the individual wrote, noting that they had “never
felt anything like this.” The person asked for “any advice on whether I should
get the second shot in a month.”
In his Feb. 24, 2021, reply, Togias said it was hard to say
“whether it was an allergic reaction or not” but noted that “Both the Moderna
and the Pfizer vaccines have induced allergic reactions” and suggested it might
not be a good idea to get a second dose.
“The most important decision is, of course, whether you
should receive your second dose or not,” Togias wrote, recommending the patient
consult with an allergist and report their reaction to the Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
NIH officials gave mixed messages about VAERS in other
emails. Notably, in a March 24, 2021, email (page 175), Togias said “VAERS is
based on self-reporting and it misses a tremendous amount of information that
would have been so helpful to everybody.”
Togias-VAERS-Response - Redacted Email (The Defender Photo)
But, in a June 13, 2021, email (page 257), Nath wrote, in
response to whether 110 VAERS reports of transverse
myelitis after COVID-19 vaccination constitute a safety
signal, that “the reliability of the VAERS database is poor since anyone can
enter the information and there may even be duplication of entries.”
‘My life as I knew it was gone’
The documents also show that vaccine-injured individuals
contacted NIH researchers before January 2021.
In a Dec. 25, 2020, email (page 167), a person injured after
getting the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine said that, within 30 minutes, they felt
“burning and tingling of my face, tightness at the base of my tongue, shortness
of breath, heart racing, chest tightness and had a near syncopal event.”
Symptoms, including facial swelling and hives, recurred the next day.
“I believe I am having a significant allergic reaction to
the vaccine,” the person wrote, adding that they were “very nervous about
receiving the second dose of the vaccine.”
In his Dec. 27, 2020, reply (page 166), Togias said he “can
understand [the person’s] hesitancy for receiving the second dose” and that he
was aware of such reactions to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
The individual sent follow-up emails on Dec. 29, 2020, and
Jan. 2, 2021 (page 165), reporting they were still ill, “really afraid” and
“frightened,” reporting “tachycardia …
chest tightness, anorexia,” and an opinion from a rheumatologist and
immunologist, who believed they were experiencing “some time [sic] of
immunological/neurological reaction.”
In a Jan. 3, 2021, reply, Togias suggested the patient file
a VAERS report, but in replies on Jan. 3, the injured individual wrote that
they filed reports “to VAERS, v
safe [sic], Pfizer multiple
times but have had no response from anyone.”
With no response from Togias, the individual sent a Feb. 10,
2021 (page 164), email, saying they were “very desperate,” “still very ill with
neurological symptoms” and “completely incapacitated … with severe paresthesias in
my face, tongue, chest wall, limbs,” asking Togias for “anyone … who might be
able to help me in some way recover.”
In Togias’ Feb. 11, 2021, reply (page 164), he said that
similar injuries “have been reported by other people; so the various agencies
and the companies know about them” but that he was “not aware whether any
research is being conducted to understand their nature.” No other responses
appear in the documents that have been released.
Autopsy ‘concurred’ death caused by Pfizer booster shot
A person who lost their brother to a vaccine injury sent a
Jan. 24, 2022, email (pages 139 and 184) to Togias, stating that an autopsy
“concurred that his death was caused directly due to the Pfizer booster
vaccine” as a result of “severe myocarditis.”
Myocarditis-Pfizer-Booster-Togias-Email – Redacted (The Defender Photo)
“Please give us answers and follow up to why this occurred,”
the individual wrote. But in his Jan. 30, 2022, reply (page 184), Togias said
myocarditis caused by COVID-19 vaccines is “rare” and “more commonly seen in
young males,” adding that the victim “was in the very, very small group of
people who lost their lives” and suggesting the filing of a VAERS report.
In an email exchange with Nath and Safavi (pages 9-12)
beginning Jan. 9, 2022, an injured individual said they had emailed Safavi in
April 2021 with no response and described “severe” injuries immediately after
receiving the Moderna vaccine, including “cardiac issues” and “severe
neurological issues.”
“At the twelve minute mark my life as I knew it was gone,”
the patient wrote (page 11). In a response the same day, Nath wrote, “We are
just as mystified as everyone else about these complications,” while in a Jan.
10, 2022, email (page 9), she said she has “absolutely no idea what might be
causing your symptoms.”
But in a Jan. 10, 2022, reply, the injured person said they
were “at the best research hospitals,” but doctors there were “waiting for
direction from the FDA and NIH on what is going on as there has been no study
that they know of as to why this is happening.”
“So many people are suffering and I’m talking people out of
suicide on a weekly basis who are having the same reactions and can’t take it,”
the individual wrote.
Nath-Best-Hospitals-FDA-NIH - Redacted Email (The Defender Photo)
Fauci ignored complaint of CICP’s slow processing of
vaccine injury claim
The emails of a person who developed myocarditis after
receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and who was frustrated with
CICP’s slow processing of their vaccine injury report was also included in this
month’s documents (pages 292-300).
According to the emails, CICP received this person’s report
on Sept. 7, 2021, and confirmed receipt on Sept. 20, 2021 (page 299), but said,
“The CICP cannot estimate when a decision may be made in you [sic] claim.”
After two follow-up emails requesting an update, CICP said on Sept. 28, 2021
(page 297), “There is no new update for your claim.”
By Oct. 5, 2021, though, the injured individual wrote to
CICP, “I’m done waiting! Your time is up!” and threatened to contact lawmakers.
The individual ultimately reached out to Rep. James McGovern (D-Mass.) — and to
Fauci, in an Oct. 20, 2021 email (page 292).
“I received myocarditis from the Pfizer vaccine [redacted]
and spent 3 days in the hospital. It wasn’t fun. It was a wretched experience.
I now have bills to pay.” This person noted that CICP only had eight
people reviewing
claims, calling this “simply unacceptable.”
“I’ve contacted the CICP, news organizations, and my local
Senators and Congressman. Haven’t heard much of anything yet.” “I would love to
hear from Dr Fauci or anyone at NIH with a response.” But no such response
came.
Michael
Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior
reporter for The Defender and part of the rotation of hosts for CHD.TV's
"Good Morning CHD."
© 2016 - 2024 Children's Health Defense® • All
Rights Reserved
Children’s
Health Defense® is a 501(c)(3) non-profit
organization. Our mission is ending childhood health epidemics by eliminating
toxic exposure. We will restore and protect the health of children by
eliminating environmental exposures, holding responsible parties accountable,
and establishing safeguards to prevent future harm of children's health.
Protecting Children. Exposing Harms. Seeking Justice.
