You may or may not have heard by now that Project
Veritas has caught a Pfizer employee- Jordon Trishton Walker (documentation
showing title: Pfizer Director of Research and Development,
Strategic Operations) – that corrupt Pfizer has been mutating COVID purposefully
(some call that illegal Gain of Function – Pfizer calls it Directed
Evolution) to make useless mRNA Jabs as a cash cow.
Today’s cross posting shares are some video commentators
relating to Pfizer and Jordon Trishton Walker perfidy and their attempted
worming their way out of truth by coverups, lies and censorship – largely with
the cooperation of Big Tech Google.
READER SUPPORTED!I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I
need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Since Youtube has unsurprisingly Censored Project Veritas
exposing Pfizer purposely mutating COVID for gain, I thought it a good idea to
upload the Project Veritas share of the Tucker Carlson segment reporting on the
expose, Big Pharma coverup, Google coverup participation and so on. Original
Youtube link (good as long as it’s not censored): https://youtu.be/t25GxQCHYgA
An example of directed evolution
with comparison to natural evolution.
The inner cycle indicates the 3 stages of the directed evolution cycle with the
natural process being mimicked in brackets. The outer circle demonstrates steps
in a typical experiment. The red symbols indicate functional variants, the pale
symbols indicate variants with reduced function. Source: Wikipedia,
encyclopedia of the approved narrative.
Wow. What a whirlwind of a week. Still trying to catch my
breath, never did make it over to my personal physician for an ECG and prescription
to get my tachycardia under control. Delivered a talk/wake up/shock on the
fifth gen warfare deployed on all of us over the last three years to 1,300
paying European attendees at a Stockholm conference exactly one week ago.
Delayed getting back from Stockholm (via Frankfurt) due to Lufthansa’s ongoing
slow decay and inability to adhere to their own flight schedules. Got Tuesday’s essay written
on the plane, posted it from the airport on landing, and finally made it back
to the farm by about 11:00 PM EST. Wednesday I drag my sorry rear end out of
bed, get the obligate three cups downed and begin the day with an
out-of-the-blue call from a mainstream New York investigative reporter (that
you would recognize) seeking background information on what the heck is going
on with the Florida Grand Jury investigations (which I know very little about -
they are running a tight ship!). Of course I have to make a few calls to
prepare for that before the 10:00 AM “on background only” discussion. Scheduled
long format “Gray Matter” podcast recording at noon, requiring some background
reading prior. And then, out of an otherwise cloudless blue sky, a lightning
strike.
Project Veritas pings me, asks if I would review an
embargoed video that they have prepared, and then allow them to record my
reaction to the material via a Zoom call. The Zoom hit scheduled so tight that
I can barely get through the embargoed material before we start. And boom. We
launch the call and I am still reeling from what I have just viewed. Veritas
uses a very tight, abrupt editing style, and they compress a half hour of my
interaction/reaction with their reporters into a few moments of the most
powerful comments. The investigative reporter who did the interview and
captured the video is present but off screen. I am told he is a former Pfizer
employee. I am told that the drop time for the resulting video product will be
8:00 PM EST, asked to participate in a Twitter Spaces discussion beginning at
9:00 PM EST, and asked to get other physicians to join. I push out alerts that
Veritas has something big coming, and to watch for it, including a personal
“heads up” text message to Tucker Carlson. Steve Kirsch calls trying to noodle
whatever intel I will give him, but it is embargoed and I hold the line on
that. The video drops early. The Twitter Spaces discussion goes big, north of
17,000 on-line live participants. Much ado over whether this is real or not.
Among other things, another Pfizer whistleblower sends James O’Keefe a Pfizer
org chart listing the young physician in question as having the role and title
as advertised, and that gets posted in real time. The Twitter Spaces discussion
keeps going after I have to drop off at 11:00 PM EST, my brain still being on
European time.
Wake up, and overnight the feces have hit the oscillating
ventilator. More coffee. Jill is inundated with interview scheduling requests.
Then the ping from Fox News, and Tucker has asked me back on the “real” Fox
broadcast. First real Fox hit since the dust up with Alex Berenson, after which
I (immaturely) called up the producer and chewed her out. Bad decision. Bottom
line, important to not screw this one up. A day of interviews following on the
Veritas bombshell (during which I cannot reveal the plans for Tucker’s
segment), together with back and forth with Fox - are we on or not? Is this a
real employee or a dark arts intel set up?
Almost immediately after the first Veritas video dropped, we
all got a masters class in the amazing power and capabilities to control
narrative and information which Pfizer has assembled. Important to remember
that it was already well known that there is a very tight relationship between
Pfizer and Thompson-Reuters. In fact, revealing that clear conflict of interest
was the thing that got me kicked off of Linked-In the first time. The UK-based
Daily Mail, one of the largest daily publications in the world, puts out a
story summarizing the Veritas video, and it is almost immediately deleted. A
decentralized army of internet warriors quickly goes to work seeking any intel
concerning Jordon Walker, M.D.. I receive screen shots which fully dox the
young physician, including email addresses and phone numbers. Do I dox or do I
not, that is the question. Decision = not.
People are hitting Google like crazy with queries regarding
Jordon Walker, Pfizer and Veritas. As they did when I said “mass formation
psychosis” on Rogan #1757,
Google manually interferes with the searches, returning wishy washy “these
results are changing rapidly” screens instead of actual links. So, now we have
a pretty clear smoking gun involving collusion between Pfizer and Google to
suppress the story. Then everything, anything, having to do with Jordon Walker,
MD gets memory holed. Wiped from the internet, including the Wayback machine.
And then the chaos agents, bots and trolls descend on all social media
channels. Sowing doubt that Jordon Walker is even a real person. Floating
paranoid conspiracy theories that this is all a big deep-fake set up of
Veritas, O’Keefe and myself. Which of course get amplified by the usual actors.
Now THAT is an example of Fifth Gen Warfare power! And by the way, I gently
advise that readers who were aware of this as it was happening set a check-bit
in their brains on the names of those chaos agents who actively promoted this
false narrative. Some show the signs of true controlled opposition, and some
appear to have been acting as pollinating bees. By their actions you will know
them. My advice, if you were one of the
bees, is to own up and clearly acknowledge the documentation
demonstrating that this Pfizer nightmare is real.
The following day, as promised, Veritas drops another
amazing video in which James O’Keefe confronts Jordon Walker in some New York
city eatery, and Dr. Walker comes unglued for all the world to see (I think
that is about the kindest description possible). Veritas provides more documentation
that Walker is/was, as advertised, a senior Pfizer employee with global
Director-level responsibilities relating to their mRNA vaccine portfolio.
Clearly Pfizer has decided that the best response at this
point is no response. They have disabled comments on all of their websites and
social media outlets (except for those that they are “following”). Pfizer has
managed to block every single major corporate news outlet from covering the
story (except Tucker, who has considerable content freedom by contract with
Fox). Jill posts a warning basically stating that we should expect the Empire
to Strike Back.
Friday, I work my way through five more long and short
format hits, trying to add new information and insights as they drop, and go to
bed early.
Which brings us to Friday night. Dogs wake me up at
midnight, and I find that Pfizer legal has finally dropped a response at 8:00
PM EST Friday night. Again, classic textbook timing. Designed to bypass the
Friday PM news cycle and more importantly to give Wall Street maximal time to
digest the news before opening bell next Monday.
These guys are professional grade. To recap, they have shut
Google searches down, memory holed/scrubbed the internet, deployed an army of
bots, trolls and chaos agents to cause confusion and doubt on social media, and
almost completely suppressed any coverage of the story by the many corporate
media outlets that they have been pumping money into over the last three years.
Payback time.
And in the face of all of this, still the social media chaos
agents persist with their work, claiming that since they are unable to find the
actual Pfizer document primary source which others have found and screen shot,
this is all fake news. Are they paid and nefarious or just “dull” and
incompetent? Hard to differentiate between those two options. But when all the
vectors of their words and actions repeatedly point in the same direction, then
it gets hard to make the case against nefarious intent. That said, their
seeming incompetence and apparent dependency on Google providing the
confirmation of their bias provides another practical fifth gen. warfare
schooling lesson. For the rest of you, can you just bypass Google searching on
this topic please? I use Brave, but there are many others. When trying to triangulate
truth these days, it is often useful to employ multiple different search
engines.
For the record, here
is the link to Pfizer corporate with the legal statement. There.
Can we please all just tell the chaos agents to go pound sand, hit “Block” for
those accounts on Twitter, GETTR, GAB, Truth Social, Instagram etc. and move on
now?
Fast forward to Saturday 28 January, we wake up, more
coffee, and get to work writing today’s essay(s). Inquiring minds want to know!
While I have been composing the above stream of
consciousness, Jill has been grabbing the best of the best from the responses
that I had posted between midnight last night and 3:00 AM after becoming aware
of the Friday 8:00 PM drop from Pfizer legal.
I will close this posting with the gems which she has mined,
and then begin composing an analysis of the response from Pfizer’s legal team.
·Yeah
but it’s not Gain Of Function though is it… Ok, sure, through various means the
virus ‘acquired’ new abilities that it didn’t have before, but it didn’t gain
any functions… You see? It didn’t Gain, it acquired… and they were abilities,
not Functions… sheesh.
·This
word salad is like renaming a child kidnapping and claiming it was an impromptu
adoption. There's nothing to see here.
·It's
not a "door". It's a rectangular piece of wood, with hinges on one
side and a knob on the other, mounted to an opening in the wall.
·The
best place to hide something is often in plain sight.
·How
is this okay? How do they get to do this and we have no recourse??
·Isn’t
this just a smarmy attempt by Pfizer to normalize everything as rare but
necessary for their development process?
·This
is an amazing tweet. Every time I click on it the number of likes and Rats goes
down. Free speech eh.
·Your
post showed up in my feed, but I couldn't RT or like the post until I clicked
on it and did so on its Tweet page. Just an FYI.
·Authorized
use by Emergency Act. Smokescreen put in place by our elected officials. Biden
sold us out!!
·Was
this a joint effort between PR and marketing. It reads more like an advert for
Paxvolid! Grifters gonna grift!
·Unfortunately
the narrative was always controlled by big tech & the legacy media, Now
with Musk buying Twitter & implementing FREE speech along platforms like
GETTR, TRUTH & GAB It’s getting harder & harder to censor the truth
Without truth, humanity cannot survive
·Yes,
and if they were doing nothing wrong, why did they disappear (scrub) Dr. Jordan
Trishton Walker from every reference to his connection to Pfizer from the
entire internet? Actions speak louder than words.
·Next
press release: “We are doing Gain of Function Research and it’s a Good Thing”
·They
literally say they engineer viruses that don't even exist outside of
simulations.
·If
true; Maybe they can call it, "Predictive Immune Escape Research" No
comment regarding the legality. It's not up to me.
·The
way it is worded, this only denies directed evolution as a component of vaccine
development, but leaves that research door open for ongoing research supporting
Paxlovid.
·Cognitive
recombination technique? Creative tweaking? Genetic massaging? Function
manipulation?
·There
is also no direct response suggesting that Mr Walker was lying…interesting.
·I
love how they just assume that everyone's capable of producing antibodies
equally. Those of us with Lyme disease know we are B cell (and Nk cell)
immunosuppressed. All risk and no benefit for us to get the . If they
were really concerned about our health, they'd pay for an
·Yeah
they literally admitted to outsourcing the research that would be considered a
grey area for pfizer to do themselves
·Classic
misdirection and flooding of unnecessary information
·And
what does it mean where they say “such virus is engineered… for activity… in
the cells”?
·So
they just hire people that make up terms and lie? He just pulled that term
right out of his ass.
·Just
the letter title headline tells me Pfizer is in full legal defense mode. That
is a good thing.
·Doesn’t
look like they denied anything
·Nuremberg
trials and sentences for these modern day Mengeles and Goebbels Frankenstein
medical tyrants experiment on other people’s bodies using coercion propaganda
and force Justice is long overdue History is repeating itself
The New World Order (NWO) perpetrated largely under the
leadership of the World Economic Forum (WEF) under what many might consider an
odd mixture of Marxism, Fascism and Corporatism is being pushed not only in
America but also on people of the once-considered Free World.
The masses are being brainwashed with 1984-style/Brave
New World-style Newspeak or Double-Speak in which lies are called truth and
the truth is called lies.
The masses are everyday people which once imagined they lived
free making a living planning for their future or a better posterity for their
progeny. The Elite are the modern wealthy and powerful who desire to construct
a cultural world in which the masses serve the whims of the Elite. If significant
portions of the masses are considered irrelevant, a hindrance or a threat to
Elitist whims and cultural agendas; THEN those particular portions of the
masses are then considered expendable worthy of elimination.
As you read and/or watch the below intentions/actions exposed
among the Elitist designs, YOU should reflect: “Are YOU worthy of
being one of the ELIMINATED?”
“In the 1971 book, Schwab and
Kroos suggested that “the management of a modern enterprise must serve not only
shareholders but all stakeholders to achieve long-term growth and prosperity.” The
stakeholders are the compliant and complicit corporations and governments, not
the citizenry.”
I also have discovered that the propaganda for the Left MSM
has attempted to discredit the Project Veritas expose by lying about the
credentials of drunken Jordon Trishton Walker spilling the Pfizer beans by
questioning his youthful appearance and his level as a Pfizer executive.
Project Veritas actually provides the documentation credentials of Walker which
can be examined:
So yup, AGAIN the Left Lies and the Right exposes the TRUTH!
THEN, I subscribe to a Bitchute Channel with the
lengthy name of Americans United
Against The New World Order. A great channel for informative
re-broadcast videos however a bit lacking in providing the Who-What-Where info
of the videos. Of interest is WHO Whistleblower Astrid Stuckelberger interviewed
by Del Bigtree of The HighWire (the info garnered from watching and
not in the description): “W.H.O. WHISTLEBLOWER ASTRID
STUCKELBERGER EXPOSES GLOBALIST AGENDA”.
The fifty-third annual meeting of the World Economic Forum
(WEF) brought together fifty-two world leaders, seventeen hundred corporate
executives, sundry artists, and other personalities to address “Cooperation in
a Fragmented World.” Fragmentation is the nemesis of the World Economic Forum
and its United Nations (UN) and corporate partners. “Fragmentation” means that
segments of the world population are not adhering to the agenda of climate
change catastrophism and the precepts of the Great Reset.
The Great Reset, meanwhile, amounts to a hybrid
state-corporate woke cartel administering the global economy (and by extension
the world’s political systems) under the direction of the WEF, the UN, the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the
World Health Organization, as well as top corporate decision-makers like
BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink.
Lest we imagine that the WEF and its meetings merely
represent the grandiose delusions of some ineffectual clowns, it should be
noted that the WEF’s “stakeholder capitalism”—introduced in 1971 by Klaus
Schwab, the WEF founder and chair, and Hein Kroos, in Modern
Enterprise Management in Mechanical Engineering—has been
embraced by the UN, by most central banks, as well as by the world’s leading
corporations, commercial banks, and asset managers. Stakeholder capitalism is
now considered to be the modus operandi of the world economic system.
In the 1971 book, Schwab and Kroos suggested that “the
management of a modern enterprise must serve not only shareholders but all
stakeholders to achieve long-term growth and prosperity.” The stakeholders are
the compliant and complicit corporations and governments, not the citizenry.
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, holds upwards
of $10 trillion in assets under management (AUM), including the pension funds
of many US states. In 2019, BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink, led the US Business Roundtable on stakeholder
capitalism. CEOs from 181 major corporations redefined the common purpose of
the corporation in terms of Schwab’s brainchild, stakeholder capitalism,
signaling the supposed end of shareholder-driven capitalism. In his 2022 letter to CEOs, Fink made BlackRock’s own
position on investment decisions quite clear. “Climate risk is investment
risk,” Fink declared. He promised a “tectonic shift in capital,” an increased
acceleration of investments going to “sustainability-focused” companies.
Fink warned CEOs: “And because this will have such a
dramatic impact on how capital is allocated, every management team and
board will need to consider how this will impact their company’s stock”(emphasis
mine). According to Fink, stakeholder capitalism is not an aberration. Fink
provides evidence of stakeholder capitalism’s woke imperative in his denial of
the same: “It is not a social or ideological agenda. It is not ‘woke.’ It
is capitalism.” This definition of capitalism would certainly have come as
news to Ludwig von Mises.
Fink sits on the board of trustees of the WEF, along
with former US vice president Al Gore; IMF managing director Kristalina
Georgieva; ECB president Christine Lagarde, and Canadian deputy prime minister
and minister of finance Chrystia Freeland, among others.
In his 2023 welcoming remarks and special address, Schwab
pointed to the multiple crises facing the world: “the energy transformation,
the consequences of covid, the reshaping of supply chains are all serving as
catalytic forces for the economic transformation.” Incidentally, these are all
factors that the WEF has promoted and/or exacerbated. And together they have
added to the “high inflation, increasing interest rates, and growing national
debt” that Schwab also decried.
Schwab pointed to the problem of social and geopolitical
fragmentation and “a messy patchwork of powers,” alluding to the war in
Ukraine. But Schwab also bemoaned “large corporate and social media powers, all
competing increasingly for power and influence. As a result, the trend is again
moving toward increased fragmentation and confrontation”—no doubt referring, at
least in part, to the recent takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk, the loss of a
major platform for propaganda and censorship. Naturally, Schwab referred to
“climate change” and “viruses” as existential threats that could lead to “the
extinction of large parts of our global population.” The question is whether
“climate change” and “viruses” or rather the responses to these supposed
menaces will be the cause of mass extinctions.
But “the most critical fragmentation” threat, Klaus argued,
is posed by those who “go into the negative” and hold a “critical and
confrontational attitude” to the Davos agenda—those with the temerity to oppose
a global agenda of climate change catastrophism, with its attendant control
over production and consumption and the virtual elimination of property and
property rights for the vast majority.
A central issue that the fifty-third annual meeting
addressed was “the Current Energy and Food Crises in the Context of a New
System for Energy, Climate and Nature.” The theme accords with the WEF’s
earlier and repeated claims that the agricultural supply chain is too
“fragmented” for “sustainable” farming. “A resilient, environmentally-friendly
food system will require a shift away from our current fragmented supply
chains,” wrote Lindsay Suddon, chief strategy officer
of Proagrica, in 2020. In Suddon’s and many other WEF papers, the
“fragmentation” refrain is repeated. Sustainable farming cannot be achieved
under the “fragmented” agricultural conditions that currently obtain.
As the heads of leading
multilateral and commercial agricultural finance institutions, we are
convinced that fragmentation within the current food systems represents the
most significant hurdle to feeding a growing population nutritiously and
sustainably.
Written by Wiebe Draijer, then chairman of the managing
board at Rabobank, and Gilbert Fossoun Houngbo, the director general–elect of
the International Labour Organization (ILO), the paper was quite telling. It
warned that unless fragmentation is addressed, “we will also have no hope of
reaching the Sustainable Development Goal of net zero emissions by 2050, given
that today’s agricultural supply chain, from farm to fork, accounts for around
27% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.”
Rabobank is one of the financial sponsors of the WEF’s Food Action Alliance (discussed below). On
its website, Rabobank notes that it operates in the
Netherlands, serving retail and corporate clients, and globally, financing the
agricultural sector. The ILO is a UN agency that sets labor standards
in 187 countries.
What interests could an international bank and a UN
international labor agency have in common? According to their jointly authored
paper, they have in common a resolve to eliminate fragmentation in agriculture.
The banking interest in defragmentation is to gain a controlling interest in
fewer and larger farms. The labor union management interest is to have more
workers under its supervision and control. The banking and labor interests
combined result in large farms worked by organized farm
laborers—nonowners—under the controlling interest of the bank. A bonus
rationale (more likely the main one) for this “scheme” is that the sustainable
development goals (SDGs) of the UN’s Agenda 2030 can thereby more easily be
implemented across “agricultural value chains and farming practices.” The
authors conclude: “Most critically, we need to aggregate opportunities,
resources and complementary expertise into large-scale projects that
can unlock investment and deliver impact” (emphasis mine). “Collective action”
is the “cure.”
In terms of agriculture, that is, “fragmentation” means too
many discrete and disparate farms. The solution to this problem is
consolidation, or the ownership of agricultural assets by fewer and fewer
entities. Enter Bill Gates in the US. The “large-scale projects” will be owned
by those who can afford to abide by the European Commission’s (EC) Farm to Fork Strategy. “The Farm to Fork Strategy
is at the heart of the European Green Deal.” The goal of the European Green
Deal is “no net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050.” (More on the Farm to
Fork Strategy and its effects on hunger and starvation below.)
The issue of food supply was addressed in a session entitled
“Sustainably Served.” The summary caption for the
session notes that “nearly 830 million people face food insecurity and more
than 3 billion are unable to afford a healthy diet. Challenges to human and
planetary health have been further compounded by rising costs, supply chain
disruptions and climate change.”
The highlight of the “Sustainably Served” panel, which otherwise amounted
to virtue signaling, came in the form of questions posed by an audience member,
“Jacob, from America”:
I want to ask a question about
food production. Last year the Dutch government announced harsh restrictions on
the use of nitrogen fertilizers. Such restrictions forced many farmers to put
much of their land out of production. And these policies led to 30,000 Dutch
farmers protesting these government policies. And this was being done at a time
when food production was already being severely curtailed because of the war in
Ukraine. My questions are, one, does the panel support similar policies being
implemented throughout the world? And do you support the Dutch farmers who are
protesting? Do not such strict policies leading to reduced food production
ultimately harm the poorest people of the world and exacerbate the problem of
malnutrition?
The questioner was one of four, yet his questions dominated
the rest of the session and led the moderator, Tolu Oni, and panelist Hanneke
Faber, the president of nutrition at Unilever, which is based in the
Netherlands, to become quite defensive. The latter replied:
I am Dutch, and our business is
based in Holland. It’s a very difficult situation in Holland. I have a lot of
sympathy for the farmers who are protesting, because it’s their livelihoods and
their businesses at risk. But I also have a lot of sympathy for what the
government is trying to do, because the nitrogen emissions are way too
high. . . . So, something needs to be done. . . .
But it’s a very Dutch problem. I
don’t think that you have to worry that those same solutions will have to go
somewhere else.
This last statement is belied by the fact that the
Netherlands is the headquarters of the WEF’s Food
Action Alliance program and the site of the Global
Coordinating Secretariat (GCS) of the WEF’s Food Innovation Hubs. Launched at the Davos Agenda
meeting in 2021, the Food Innovation Hubs have as their goal alignment with the
UN Food Systems Summit: “The role of the GCS will be to coordinate the efforts
of the regional Hubs as well as align with global processes and initiatives
such as the UN Food Systems Summit.” And the stated goal of
the UN Food Systems Summit is to align agricultural production with Agenda
2030’s SDGs: “The UN Food Systems Summit, held during the UN General Assembly
in New York on September 23 [2021], set the stage for global food systems
transformation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.”
“Sustainability” and “sustainable development” do not mean,
as the words seem to suggest, the ability to withstand shocks of various
kinds—economic crises, natural disasters, etc. They mean development
constrained by utopian, unscientific environmentalist imperatives, inclusive
of reduced production and consumption in the developed world and the thwarting
of development that would result in the production of additional GHGs in the
developing world. In terms of agriculture, this entails a reduction in the use
of nitrogen-rich fertilizers and their eventual elimination and the phasing out
of methane- and ammonia-producing cattle. In the Netherlands, the Food Hubs
initiative has already led to the government’s compulsory buyout and closure of as many as
three thousand farms, which will lead to dramatically reduced crop yields from
the world’s second-largest exporter of agricultural products.
The situation in the Netherlands is also part of the
European Commission’s Farm to Fork Strategy. Under the Trump administration,
the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) found that adopting the plan would result in a
decline in agricultural production of between 7 percent and 12 percent for the
European Union, depending on whether the adoption is EU-wide or global. With
EU-only adoption, the decline in EU agricultural production was projected to
be 12 percent, as opposed to 7 percent should the adoption become global. In
the case of global adoption, worldwide agricultural production was projected to
drop by 11 percent. Further, the USDA reported:
The decline in agricultural
production would tighten the EU food supply, resulting in price increases that
impact consumer budgets. Prices and per capita food costs would increase the
most for the EU, across each of the three scenarios [a middle scenario of
adoption of Farm to Fork by the EU and neighboring nation-states was included
in the study]. However, price and food cost increases would be significant for
most regions if [Farm to Fork] Strategies are adopted globally. For the United
States, price and food costs would remain relatively unchanged except in the
case of global adoption.
Production declines in the EU
and elsewhere would lead to reduced trade, although some regions would benefit
depending on changes in import demand. However, if trade is restricted as a
result of the imposition of the proposed measures, the negative impacts
are concentrated in regions with the world’s most food-insecure populations. . . .
Food insecurity, measured as the
number of people who lack access to a diet of at least 2,100 calories a day,
increases significantly in the 76 low- and middle-income countries covered in
our analysis due to increases in food commodity prices and declines in income,
particularly in Africa. By 2030, the number of food-insecure people in
the case of EU-only adoption would increase by an additional 22 million more
than projected without the EC’s proposed Strategies. The number would climb to
103 million under the middle scenario and 185 million under global adoption.
(emphasis mine)
Thus, we see that “sustainably served” means sustainably
starved.
Another panel of note was “Stewarding Responsible Capitalism,” which featured
Brian T. Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America and chair of the WEF business
council, among others. An arch proponent of stakeholder capitalism, Moynihan
suggested that companies that do not meet environmental, social, and governance
(ESG) criteria will simply be left behind. No one will do business with such
companies, he said.
Moynihan’s comments revealed the extent to which stakeholder
capitalism and the metric for measuring it, the ESG index, have penetrated
commercial banking. In fact, over three hundred major banks are signatories of
the UN’s “Principles for Responsible Banking,” “representing
almost half of the global banking industry.” Meanwhile, forty-seven hundred
asset management firms, asset owners, and asset service providers have signed the UN’s six “Principles for Responsible Investment.” These
principles are entirely focused on ESG compliance and meeting the UN’s Agenda
2030 sustainable development goals. ESG indexing now pervades every aspect of
banking and investment businesses, including what companies they invest in, how
they adhere to ESG metrics themselves, and how they cooperate with competitors
to promote ESGs. Thus, the goal of the principles is to universalize ESG
investing. ESG indexing raises the cost of doing business, starves the
noncompliant of capital, and creates a woke cartel of preferred producers.
In the “Philanthropy: A Catalyst for Protecting Our Planet”
session, US climate envoy John Kerry suggested that he and the people at Davos
were “a select group of human beings, [who], because of whatever touched us at
some point in our lives, are able to sit in a room and come together and
actually talk about saving the planet.” Betraying the religious, cultlike
character of the Davos group, Kerry suggested that his and others’ anointment
as saviors of the planet was “almost extraterrestrial.” If you tell them you
are interested in saving the planet, “most people,” Kerry continued, “they
think you are a tree-hugging leftie liberal do-gooder.” But I submit that “most
people” think Kerry and his ilk are not do-gooders at all but rather control
freaks and megalomaniacs bent on controlling the world’s population.
On other panels, the speakers stated that eating meat,
driving cars, and living outside the bounds of fifteen-minute
cities should be disallowed.
In short, with the Davos agenda, we are confronted with a
concerted, coordinated campaign to dismantle the productive capabilities in
energy, manufacturing, and farming. This project, driven by elites and accruing
to their benefit, is amounting to the largest Great Leap Backward in
recorded history. If it is not stopped and reversed, it will lead to economic
disaster, including dramatically reduced consumption and living standards. And
it will almost certainly result in more hunger in the developed world and
famines in the developing world. WEF chairman Schwab may outdo Chairman Mao.
If we let him.
Michael Rectenwald is
the author of twelve books, including The Great Reset and the
Struggle for Liberty: Unraveling the Global Agenda, Thought Criminal, Beyond
Woke, Google Archipelago, and Springtime for Snowflakes.
He is a distinguished fellow at Hillsdale College.
Mises Institute is a tax-exempt
501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions
are tax-deductible to the full extent the law allows. Tax ID# 52-1263436. Mises Wire.
Jack Posobiec & Noor Bin Laden report on the WEF-Davos
meeting that took place M-F (1/16 to 1/20/23). The video was originally on
Gettr on Sunday 1/22/23 under the production Human Events: https://gettr.com/streaming/p25yo2af49d
+++++++++++++++++++
The ‘Great Food Reset’: Who’s Behind Plan to Reengineer
the Global Food Supply?
Journalist James Corbett identifies the cast of
characters driving the Great Food Reset, a plan to reengineer the global food
supply under the guise of a fake food crisis.
Food, Corbett noted a week earlier on his Substack, has been
leveraged throughout human history as a “powerful
tool of control.”
But it’s not too late to “start formulating our own plans
for counteracting this agenda” of control, Corbett said.
What’s the first step? Look closely at who’s behind the
agenda.
According to Corbett:
“In order to truly do something
to derail the runaway train that is the Great
Food Reset, we must first understand it. And in order to understand
it, we have to know something about the people behind this agenda.”
Corbett provided an information-packed rundown of the groups
and individuals he believes are the drivers — historically and today — of the
Great Food Reset.
“From the beginning of the so-called ‘Green Revolution’ to
the so-called ‘Gene Revolution,’ the Rockefellers have been there,” Corbett
said, “helping to move things along with their ‘philanthropic’ donations.”
Corbett cited the Rockefellers’ recent work in Africa, which
operates under the name Alliance for a
Green Revolution in Africa. The alliance’s stated goal — to
“elevate the single African voice” — “sounds nice and fuzzy, until you learn
that 200 organizations have come together to denounce
the alliance and its activities,” Corbett said.
Corbett said the 200 critics of the alliance “claim that the
group has not only ‘unequivocally
failed in its mission,’ but has actually ‘harmed broader efforts to
support African farmers.’”
Bill Gates
Corbett pointed out that Bill
Gates, Sr., in 2009, admitted he had looked to the Rockefeller
Foundation as an example to follow when he helped his son set up the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation — so it comes as “no surprise” that Bill Gates is
heavily invested in the Great Food Reset.
Gates is “literally invested” in the food reset through his
financing of the fake
meat industry, Corbett said.
“Miraculously, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust
was able to divest
itself of its Beyond Meat stock right before the shares tanked
in 2019,” Corbett said, adding, “The Gateses must be super-shrewd investors!”
Corbett also noted that Gates invested millions into “hacking
your microbiome” to reengineer humans’ gut bacteria.
“Gee, I wonder why someone who’s so obsessed with completely
reengineering the food supply and making us dependent on the lab-grown
synthetic food substitutes he funds would be buying up farmland?” Corbett said.
Among other goals, the WEF wants more people to eat more
insects.
“[Klaus]
Schwab’s desire to get humans off of traditional sources of
protein and nutrients is very much a part of that Great Reset plan,” Corbett
said.
Moreover, the EAT Forum, he said, also works with “nearly 40
city governments in Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, South America and
Australia, and helps the Gates-funded United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
create updated dietary guidelines.”
“The whole document is couched in the bland bureaucratic
doublespeak of ‘equity,’ ‘inclusion’ and ‘sustainability,’” Corbett said. “But,
if you know how to read between the lines, it isn’t hard to understand what the
report is really saying.”
“USAID’s ‘leverage’ over developing countries — specifically
referenced no less than 125 times — gives an insight into the Kissingerian
food-as-a-weapon mentality that is the very basis of USAID and
its mission,” Corbett said.
He added:
“The entire enterprise
reeks of a neocolonial landgrab masquerading as ‘philanthropy’ — the kind of
territorial taking that people in Africa and elsewhere have been warning about
for decades.”
Suzanne
Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The
Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa. She holds a Ph.D. in Communication Studies
from the University of Texas at Austin (2021), and a master's degree in
communication and leadership from Gonzaga University (2015). Her scholarship
has been published in Health Communication. She has taught at various academic
institutions in the United States and is fluent in Spanish.
Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’
for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a
Cash Cow for Us’ … ‘That is Not What We Say to the Public’ … ‘People Won’t Like
That’ … ‘Don’t Tell Anyone’
·Jordon
Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic
Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is
like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create --
preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're
gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one
wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
·Walker:
“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment]
would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them
to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
·Walker:
“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate
doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the
way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this
virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
·Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer
scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow
because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it
too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing
because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future
mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new
video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims
that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution”
to preempt the development of future vaccines.
Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than
Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced
activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can
become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed
on it.
The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his
company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not
like this information if it went public.
“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why
don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively
develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that
though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be
having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.
“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are
optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone
is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I
think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you
obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,”
he said.
“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way
it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we
successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial
samples from them.”
Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project
and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus
[COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere.
Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It
makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.
“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with
viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make
them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that
is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,”
he said.
Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been
instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:
Walker: Part of what they
[Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you
know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So,
it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine
prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it
controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes
out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.
Veritas Journalist: Oh my
God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control
nature before nature even happens itself? Right?
Walker: Yeah. If it
works.
Veritas Journalist: What
do you mean if it works?
Walker: Because some of
the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like
with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going
to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going
forward. Like obviously.
Veritas Journalist: Well,
I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the
ultimate cash cow.
Walker: Yeah, it’d be
perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government
officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual
interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:
Walker: [Big Pharma] is a
revolving door for all government officials.
Veritas Journalist: Wow.
Walker: In any industry
though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs --
eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the
military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies
afterwards.
…
Veritas Journalist: How
do you feel about that revolving door?
Walker: It’s pretty good
for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.
Veritas Journalist: Why
is it bad for everybody else?
Walker: Because when the
regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are
going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the
company that’s going to give them a job.
About Project Veritas
James O'Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a
non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work.
Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty,
self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions
to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation
to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law,
specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of
ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote
truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues
including the right to anonymity. O'Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the
Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well
as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture.
Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization.
Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues raised
through its investigations.
‘Never Again Is Now Global,’ a five-part docuseries directed
by holocaust survivor Vera Sharav highlights the
parallels between Nazi Germany and global pandemic policies, will premier
exclusively, for free on CHD.TV beginning Monday, Jan. 30, at 7 p.m.
EST.
Holocaust Survivors, featured in the docuseries explain how
Nazi interventions — including the suspension of freedoms, imposition of
lockdowns, coerced medical procedures and identity passports — are similar to
modern-day dictatorial constraints on citizens worldwide.
We sat down with Vera at her home in the Upper West Side of
New York City — for an hour and a half CHD.TV exclusive to discuss the
docuseries + the importance of disobeying the totalitarian continuum. Don't
miss this iconic interview.
[Blog Editor: For embed purposes I uploaded to my
Bitchute Channel. Note there is a little over a minute delay before the program
proceeds.]
