As the loyal readers are aware, I accrue numerous videos I’ve
downloaded or saved from various Social and Video Platforms due to personal
interest or fascination. I may not agree with everything said in the videos but
probably agree with most of the content. This is where you employ some of your
own critical thinking.
This haul of videos has become huge, which means there is no
way I’ll be sharing them in one post. Some are short and a few are long, so
watch as your time permits.
There will be a mixture addressing political tyranny and
medical tyranny. And some videos might be a little dated, in which case consider
the viewing a refresher course.
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR
generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income by
selling healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of- individual,
buy some healthy, antioxidant, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE [benefits
& product INFO – (ORIGINAL PRODUCTS) HERE
& (NEW WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCTS) HERE
& HOW-TO
WEIGHT MANAGEMENT]: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
(Become a Business Influencer and MAKE YOUR OWN CASH [Influencers receive
own store link & better discounts with annual $40 membership])
I first discovered the link to this video either Telegram
AFLDS or Simone Gold, cannot remember which. The link (https://aflds.org/medical/mutilation)
sends to an AFLDS post of Dr. Simone Gold talking (16:56) about the Medical
Mutilation of Children brainwashed into believing they should change the gender
that God Almighty gave them at birth.
AFLDS Description:
“What is commonly referred to as
Gender-Affirming Care involves life-altering procedures that carry high risks.
Recognizing the profound, irreversible harm associated with hormonal and
surgical interventions aimed at addressing gender dysphoria, AFLDS calls for an
immediate moratorium on these interventions for children.”
“The Attempted Assassination of
Donald Trump; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on a Key Piece of the Puzzle That
Contributed to the Attempt on Donald Trump’s Life, Former CDC Director Exposes
a Data Coverup, and California Passes Yet Another Law That Puts the State
Between the Parent and their Child; New Dangers from Baby Formula to Your
Growing Baby.
Guests: Byron Rodgers, Zen
Honeycutt, Michelle Perro M.D.”
“There’s a new campaign taking
place in China, where the CCP is trying to revive Marxism by merging it into
Chinese culture. The campaign isn’t limited to just theory. It represents changes
taking place throughout the country, from farms to the military, and from
business to the CCP leadership. It appears that the CCP is planning to become
more isolated from the world and, as new alliances are forming amid growing
threats of war, the regime is trying to roll the country back to Maoist-era
policies. We’ll discuss the changes currently taking place, and what they mean,
on this episode of Crossroads.
Views expressed in this video
are opinions of the host and guests, and do not necessarily reflect the views
of The Epoch Times.”
I subscribe to The Epoch Times (https://www.theepochtimes.com/).
I realize TET will post articles and videos that non-subscribers might miss out
on. This is one of those occasions. TET is very protective of its copyright and
typically does not recognize Fair Use principles in sharing. That’s when
I share on platforms dedicated to Fair Use.
As such, I’m cross posting a 10:39-Minute video billed as
part of the series “How the Specter of Communism is Ruling Our World”
(https://bit.ly/3WLihVp). It
was posted on 7/29/20 (https://bit.ly/4fvLuuI).
It has been a full century since
the Communist Party seized power in the Soviet Union. According to records
compiled by the U.S. Congress, communist regimes were responsible for the
deaths of at least 100 million people. The Black Book of Communism details this
history of murder.
From documents declassified by the
governments of nations in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, as well
as official records on the victims of communist political campaigns in China
and North Korea, the public has gained a good picture of the Communist Party’s
addiction to killing.
Communist totalitarianism is often
compared to that of the Nazis. While there are many parallels to be found,
there is one crucial distinction that is often overlooked: The Nazis aimed to
eliminate the Jewish people, but the goal of communism goes beyond physical
slaughter.
People of faith do not consider
physical demise to be one’s true death, since the soul goes to heaven or is
born again in the cycle of reincarnation. The Communist Party uses killing as
an instrument to plant the seeds of terror in the minds of the people, forcing
them to accept its evil ideology. Through the destruction of morality, people’s
souls are fated to damnation. The Communist Party aims not just to destroy
man’s physical body, but also his soul.
I found this Lara Logan interview of Dr. Kirk Elliot on Lara
Logan's Substack (https://laralogan.substack.com/)
posted on 7/8/24 but the post indicated the interview took place on 7/3/24 (https://bit.ly/3XVJQfz).
Dr. Elliot discusses the failure of Bidenomics in terms of
inflation and probable Bank failures.
A few days ago [ACTUALLY 2020-ELECTED] President
Donald Trump was convicted of crimes no one seems to be able clearly define.
The crimes are so ethereal that Dem-Marxists who faced similar accusations
either received a slap on the wrist or ludicrously insignificant fines as they
went on to campaign in their elections.
I first read about the Lawfare/Political conviction on a WarRoom: Official Telegram Channel
post. To be honest, I rarely comment on Telegram. However I was so incensed (after
reading Leftist commentators reluctantly sharing the Bragg’s case was weak)
that I typed this comment a few days ago: “That pisses me off!!!”
The anger I feel now is reminiscent of I felt as watched the
November 2020 Election process into the wee hours of the night. Until Fox News
decided to acquiesce to the Coup, they actually showed Swing State sites STOP
Vote counts, kicking GOP watchers out of buildings, video tapings of mysterious
suitcases being opened before cameras was shut off and so on. THEN the
announcement Dementia Joe won with 81-million votes (when only handfuls of
supporters showed up to Dementia Joe’s campaign rallies).
Since 2020, AND NOW 2024, I feel I live in a nation where
the Constitution is shredded, the Rule of Law is Soviet-style and the heritage
established by America’s Founders has placed Americans wanting to live under
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness back into a historical context
similar to what was faced under British-Ruling Tyranny.
And my anger with this tyrannical situation is what is going
to make a lengthy post as a share posts and thoughts that stoke my feelings.
Feel free to stop reading if this political climate has elicited such personal
pessimism that the Dem-Marxist Fundamental Transformation is an irreversible inevitability
that you choose to succumb to.
If you desire to resist the Fundamental Transformation of
America, READ ON. If you are young enough to be involved in some kind of active
mobilization (NOT beginning with violence like Dem-Marxists), YOU SHOULD DO SO.
Let us see what follows when government tyranny begins the arrests of thousands
or use violent police powers to shut down Constitutionally protected protests.
If you are in my situation of disability or elderly making active mobilization
difficult, becoming an inciting voice to inspire the mobilization of active
individuals.
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR
generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements income by selling
healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of-individual, buy some healthy, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/
*************************
[Blog Editor: I begin with an interesting post I first on
Telegram posted by a person going by John Wayne (FL). I suspect
the name is a pseudonym but I don’t know. Then going through my emails, I
discovered the very same wording on a Gab email update. So, I’m going with that
credit.]
The Appeal to Heaven, also known as the Pine Tree Flag, is a
historical banner that has long represented the fight for freedom. Recently
this iconic flag has come under attack by those who seek to suppress the values
it embodies.
The Appeal to Heaven Flag dates back to the early days of
the American Revolution, when the colonies were seeking to break free from
British rule. The flag features a green pine tree with the phrase “An Appeal to
Heaven” emblazoned on a white banner beneath it. This design was inspired by
the words of John Locke, a prominent philosopher and political theorist whose
ideas greatly influenced the founding principles of the United States.
In his work, “Two Treatises of Government,” Locke wrote that
when a government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens, those
citizens have the right to “appeal to heaven” for justice. The pine tree, a
symbol of resilience and strength, was chosen to represent the colonies’
determination to fight for their rights and independence.
The flag was flown by American ships during the
Revolutionary War and was used by various military units, including the
Massachusetts Navy and the Washington Cruisers. Its presence on the battlefield
served as a powerful reminder that the colonists’ struggle for freedom was
grounded in their faith in God and their belief in the inherent rights of all
men.
In recent years, the Appeal to Heaven Flag has been adopted
by Christian Nationalists as a symbol of their commitment to upholding the
principles of faith, freedom, and self-governance. As a Christian Nationalist
myself, I have been flying the flag outside my home for over five years, and
its meaning has only grown stronger for me in that time.
The flag serves as a constant reminder of the sacrifices
made by our forefathers in the pursuit of liberty and the importance of
maintaining a strong connection between our faith and our governance. It is a
declaration that we, as Christian Nationalists, will not stand idly by while
our rights and values are trampled upon by those who seek to undermine them.
The recent attack on the Appeal to Heaven Flag, which was
flown outside the Virginia home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.,
is a clear indication that our enemies recognize the power and significance of
this symbol. However, their attempts to discredit and suppress it will only
strengthen our resolve to continue flying it proudly.
In recent years the credibility of the democratic process
has been called into question as allegations of election rigging and voter
suppression have become increasingly common. This has left many feeling
disillusioned and powerless, as their voices seemingly go unheard and their
votes rendered meaningless.
The feeling of hopelessness is further exacerbated by the
obvious control exerted by malevolent forces over our society. These forces,
which can be described as demonic in nature, are characterized by their hatred
for traditional values and their relentless pursuit of power and control.
In such a climate, it is easy to feel overwhelmed and
powerless. However, the Appeal to Heaven Flag serves as a powerful symbol of
hope and resistance.
The concept of appealing to heaven is deeply rooted in the
Christian faith and has been a guiding principle for countless believers
throughout history. The Appeal to Heaven Flag embodies this principle. By
flying the Appeal to Heaven Flag, we acknowledge that our struggle is not
merely a political one, but a spiritual one as well. We recognize that the
forces we are up against are not merely human, but demonic in nature. This is
not to say that we should abandon our efforts to effect change in the political
realm. Rather, it is a call to recognize the spiritual dimension of our
struggle and to seek divine guidance and protection in our endeavors.
In times of darkness and despair, it is faith that can
provide the strength and resilience needed to persevere. The Appeal to Heaven
Flag serves as a powerful symbol of this faith, reminding us that we are not
alone in our struggle and that our ultimate salvation lies in the hands of God.
By embracing the Appeal to Heaven Flag, we acknowledge the
spiritual dimension of our struggle and commit ourselves to seeking divine
guidance and protection in our endeavors. We recognize that our ultimate
victory will not be achieved through our own strength alone, but through the
power of faith and the grace of God.
The Appeal to Heaven Flag has a rich history that is
intertwined with the founding principles of the United States and the values of
Christian Nationalism. As a Christian Nationalist, I will continue to fly this
flag as a symbol of my commitment to the ideals of faith, freedom, and
self-governance. I encourage all those who share these values to join me in
embracing the Appeal to Heaven Flag as a powerful symbol of our ongoing
struggle for a better future.
There is tremendous power in appealing to heaven.
To God Be The Glory,
Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Christ is King
++++++++++++++++++
Megyn Kelly Advocates
for Legal Action Against Democrats
Megyn Kelly, the former Fox News host, recently ignited a
fiery discourse on her SiriusXM show that has garnered much attention. Her
impassioned monologue centered around the verdict in former President Donald
Trump’s Manhattan hush money trial, a topic that she approached with undeniable
fervor.
“This is a before and after moment for America,” Kelly
stated emphatically, underscoring the significance of the situation. She drew a
clear distinction by asserting that to amend what she referred to as Trump’s
“crucifixion” in the American justice system, Democrats need to be held
accountable and face legal consequences. “Democrats will rue the day they
decided to use lawfare to stop a presidential candidate,” she cautioned. Her
argument was not promoting violence but advocating for a reciprocal legal strategy.
In her view, influential figures such as Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Hillary
Clinton could potentially be implicated, possibly extending statutes of
limitations to probe past offenses akin to E. Jean Carroll’s case under New
York state law.
To strengthen her argument, Kelly referenced an article by
John Yoo, a White House attorney during the Bush administration. Yoo suggested
that giving Democrats “a taste of their own medicine” is the only way they’ll
learn their lesson. “They tasted blood today,” Kelly commented metaphorically
equating Democrats to wolves hungry for more power. In her opinion, it’s time
for political reprisal as never before have such high stakes been at risk for
the Republic.
— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) May 31, 2024
Intriguingly, Kelly is not the only one expressing newfound
support for Trump. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, despite his previously
strained relationship with Trump, has committed substantial financial backing
to his campaign with a goal to raise at least $10 million. Following the trial
verdict’s backlash, MAGA supporters inundated Trump’s campaign with over $34
million in donations within just 24 hours, causing a temporary crash of the
website. High-profile conservative donors are also stepping up with six-figure
contributions.
Kelly believes that Democrats are failing to comprehend
Trump’s increasing popularity among blue-collar voters and Americans of color.
She highlighted how figures like George Stephanopoulos struggle to understand
Republican perspectives on what constitutes criminality. Kelly ridiculed
Stephanopoulos for his evident confusion when New Hampshire’s Republican
Governor Chris Sununu voiced his support for Trump. According to Kelly, almost
half of the country perceives actions by Democrats such as challenging elections
or burning police stations as less severe than the allegations against Trump.
Renowned for her straightforward style, Kelly doesn’t shy
away from making bold claims that resonate with a significant segment of
voters. These assertions mirror deep-rooted frustrations and a readiness for
drastic political retribution among many Americans. Whether her calls for
action will take shape remains uncertain; however, one thing is clear: Megyn
Kelly continues to stir controversy and command attention in America’s ongoing
political narrative.
We live in a strange time. The law in many states, cities,
and jurisdictions in this country, especially in Democrat strongholds, has been
laid low. In Chicago, a judge acquits an attacker who stole a police car, ran
over a Chicago cop, and crashed into four vehicles. In California, shoplifting
is now de facto legal.
The Democrats have turned our country into a corrupt
shithole
Shoplifting merchandise with a value under $950 is now a
misdemeanor in California, which means the police will not bother to
investigate and will most likely let the thief go. It has resulted in brazen
acts of smash and grab and flash mobs walking in stores, sometimes with
shopping carts, filling them up, and walking out. Fact-checkers will disagree,
because it is their job to forward the Left's narrative. As a result, hundreds
of businesses have closed, leaving neighborhoods either without stores or stores
with locked toothpaste.
George Floyd's refusal to face arrest allows leftist mobs to get away with
burning down major parts of a city. The most expensive insurance in U.S.
history. However, the perpetrators of this misapplication of protest rights
found solace in the Democrat Party, which paid for many of their bail bonds. It
makes one ask, Who are these thugs working for? This is the country we now live
in.
The Democrats have turned our country into a corrupt
shithole because they have shown themselves to be unwilling to pass the mantle
of power to any other political party. They feel obligated to use any legal or
illegal means to bring down and destroy their opposition—weaponize the law, if
you will.
In the Banana Republic of Mexico, 36 murders of candidates have taken place
thus far during their current election cycle. Just days ago, a right-leaning
mayoral candidate named Alfredo Cabrera was shot multiple times during a rally.
He is dead. Cabrera, like so many others, failed to receive approval from the
criminal cartels.
The Democrat Party is the criminal cartel in this country.
Since the Trump trial and its deliberations have dominated
conversations for the past few weeks and days, I thought it would be helpful to
explain the legal issues and the trial's conduct.
President Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsifying
business records under New York Business Law 175.10. It states:
“A person is guilty of
falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of
falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to
defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the
commission thereof.”
The New York Election Law 17-152 violation was another
charge against President Trump:
“Conspiracy to promote or
prevent an election. Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent
the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and whose
conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor.”
The 34 counts, or records, consist of 11 checks written to
Michael Cohen, along with comparable vouchers and invoices. The prosecution
alleges that the payments marked as legal expenses, were reimbursements for
payments made by Cohen to Stormy Daniels to aid in the election of Donald
Trump. What was Clinton's payment to Paula Jones listed as? Remember, Paula
Jones accused Clinton of rape!
Elections are supposed to be won by issues, not the
weaponization of the law
The prosecution must demonstrate President Trump's intention
to defraud or conceal the alleged conspiracy by creating business records.
That all somewhat sounds clear, but the jury, and a myriad of legal observers
said it was confusing or made confusing from the start. The charges were never
made clear to the jury. This was a case that has quite possibly destroyed the
election system of our country. Elections are supposed to be won by issues, not
the weaponization of the law. To even the casual observer, this case was 100%
political. These charges were never brought before a court by anyone in
American history. No one wanted to take this case to court except those who
were elected with the promise of 'getting Trump.' Witnesses were called who had
nothing to do with the case. The Democrats are now using the case as campaign
fodder. How is all this not political? The strategy in court was to gather as
many witnesses as possible to testify that Trump is a bum. 'Maybe we'll find
something to hang him with.'
Is this how we conduct presidential elections?
The jury seemed confused much of the time. The case never should have been
heard in New York City, a Democrat stronghold where elections routinely go
80–90% Democrat. A change of venue was denied.
This was a kangaroo court by its very definition
Some witnesses, like Michael Cohen, Trump's former attorney,
demand special attention. Here is a man who cannot tell the truth, a convicted
perjurer who lost his license to practice law, hired Lanny Davis, a long-time
Democrat operative, as his attorney, and was sentenced to three years in prison
for tax evasion, making false statements to a federally insured bank, and
campaign finance violations. He spent most of his sentence in home confinement
and vowed that he would never go to prison again. That leads to the conclusion
that he will say anything the feds or Democrats want him to say.
The judge, Juan Merchan, is a Colombian-born American who regularly donates to
Democrats and progressive causes. He has a daughter, who is president of
Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm
whose top clients raised $93 million for Democrats during the Trump case.
Recusal of the judge was denied.
This was a kangaroo court by its very definition. Does a bookkeeping violation
warrant 34 felony counts? This judge never even allowed Trump witnesses to
explain their answers. No one seems to know what the jury convicted Trump of.
The judge (paraphrased) instructed the jury to find something to convict.
What in American history can we compare this with? Turning our country into a
banana republic? At the same time, the Democrats have been attacking the
Supreme Court, trying to get Alito to recuse himself because his wife likes to
fly flags from America's past, like the Appeal to Heaven, a flag hung by other
cities routinely throughout our history.
This case was not about the law. It was about stopping
Trump
What this all comes to is the realization that we are in
danger of a split or divorce. Where are our common values, the E Pluribus Unum?
The Democrat Party wants to jail Donald Trump because he's about to win an
election? The Left in our country does not respect our Constitution, our system
of government, or our elections. They don't like the electoral college. They
would rather have mob rule, and the word 'mob' is perfect to describe
Democrats. Even James Carville believes left-wing Democrats are "annoying
and silly."
The Democrat Party has shown that, in spite of their claim to protect
democracy, the rule of law, and the integrity of our institutions, they have
systematically dismantled this country. This case was not about the law. It was
about stopping Trump. They've weaponized the law to destroy all opposition they
deem dangerous to their hold on power. This cannot continue.
If we do not get a handle on this split and come to some kind of consensus, I
fear violence and civil war. The Democrat Party has been taken over by leftist
fanatics, with almost the entire media encouraging and feeding them. If there
are any centrists still in the party, they need to come together and take their
party back. A banana republic in the United States will not stand!
We need to put the sleeping giant back to sleep.
Ray DiLorenzo
is a career pilot having retired after 22 years as a contract fire pilot with
the California Department of Forestry (Cal-Fire). He is presently
affiliated with Stand Up America
US Foundation founded by Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret).
Content is
Copyright 1997-2024--the individual authors | Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press
Father God, we thank You for
Your just nature. We know that injustice grieves You more than it grieves us.
Bring about justice in America.
I miss precedented times. Since the pandemic started in
2020, the news has warned us about the unprecedented times we live in seemingly
every day. There have been enough historic news events in these past few years
to fill entire libraries. The very saying “unprecedented times” has become
almost meaningless, considering how often both sides of the political aisle
have used it to describe newsworthy events.
Nevertheless, we truly are living in unprecedented times.
The conviction of former United States President Donald Trump exemplifies this.
On May 30, 2024, Donald Trump was found guilty on 34 charges
of falsifying business records. Trump was already the first former president
ever to face a criminal trial. Now, he has become the first former president
ever to become a convicted felon.
President Trump’s sentencing will take place on July 11. He
could face a simple fine or probation, but Judge Merchan could also sentence
him to up to 4 years in prison. This could lead to Trump, currently the leading
candidate in the presidential race, campaigning from a cell. This would be yet
another first for the former president, as well as for the nation.
The prosecution accused Trump of poor record-keeping,
improperly recording hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels. While the
defense argued that these payments were unrelated to Trump’s campaign and
political ambitions, the prosecution argued that they should have been
classified as campaign-finance expenses.
It is important to remember that business-records charges
are not felony offenses. To elevate the charges to felonies, the prosecution
relied on an expansive legal theory, alleging that Trump falsified business
records to conceal the underlying crime of defrauding the American public.
Throughout the trial, the defense cast doubt on Michael
Cohen, the prosecution’s star witness. Cohen, a disbarred former attorney, did
implicate Trump in his testimony. He also, however, admitted to stealing money
from the Trump Organization, painting his testimony and honesty in a dubious
light.
Many feel that Trump never had a fair chance in this trial,
regardless of how the arguments played out. After all, how could he? Alvin
Bragg, the district attorney who brought this case, is an outspoken Democrat
with a long history of opposing the Trump family. Judge Merchan formerly
donated to the Biden campaign in 2020, and his daughter has worked with
Democrat campaigns and political action committees. Above all else, Trump stood
before a jury in one of the most deep blue areas of the country. The odds were
not in his favor.
New York law allows Judges much leeway in application of
legal process. At one point he instructed the jury they were able to convict
while not finding him guilty. The jury was not required to be unanimous on each
of the 36 counts. We will never know what the actual vote of each count
actually was.
So what happens now?
Trump’s sentencing could be delayed, but it’s unlikely that
Merchan will allow that. In preparation for the sentencing, probation officers
will complete an advisory presentencing report, and Trump will gather letters
attesting to his character. As all parties prepare for the first-ever
sentencing of a former president and leading presidential candidate, we look
forward to more unprecedented times in July.
How We Can Pray
Many are saying that May 30 was a dark day in American
history, describing the conviction as a hopeless crossing of the Rubicon, a
crushing victory of the forces of darkness over the people of God. But there is
always hope in Christ. This darkness cannot and will not suffocate the light.
In fact, Isaiah 60 gives great hope that when darkness is heavy and thick, the
glory of the Lord rises on us. That is where my focus and my hope is.
Trump will almost certainly appeal and fight his verdict,
which is a lawfare-fueled attempt to keep him out of the White House, and we’ll
pray that it won’t stop him. Even now, we pray that God’s will would be done in
November and we pray that the election will be fair and accurate, with
Christians exercising their responsibility and privilege to vote.
Above all else, we will continue to hope. The enemy is
always seeking to demoralize us. God uses his attacks for our good and His
glory. And God will have the last word on all human affairs. May His will
be done.
ZeroHedge
and THE EXPOSÉ have
picked up some very good old posts that explain much and made them recent by cross
posting them. AND I’m getting on the train by cross posting them together. The
posts on first appearance may seem unrelated.
ZeroHedge cross posted a Paul Craig Roberts 8/3/23 fantastic
analysis of the Trump indictments showing how the Dem-Marxist prosecutors are absurdly
twisting or even fabricating laws to keep the actually elected President Trump
from re-taking Office and therefore Power. The underlying looming question is, “WHY
AND WHAT are the Deep State hacks so afraid of with Trump running the show?”
AND THAT’S MY CONNECTING ROD. You can believe it or dismiss
it. The critical thinking is something I pray YOU embark upon. Below are updated
versions of the cross posts.
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My
Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
The charges against Trump brought by corrupt Democrat
appointees are for propaganda purposes and for sidelining the candidate who the
Democrats know will win the next election.
If the Democrats did not regard Trump as the winning
candidate, they would not have shown their corrupt colors with four false
indictments.
Many of the charges are based on interpretations or
assertions of law never before seen in any court other than Stalin’s purge
trials in the 1930s.
Start with the realization that the three charges and a
pending fourth are charges against Trump while he was in office as President of
the United States. The Democrat’s charge that a President of the United States
committed numerous felonies amounting to four separate felony trials. Ask
yourself how likely is this.
Remember, also, that the Vietnam War, Gulf of Tonkin,
bombings of Cambodia and Laos, Manning’s revelation of war crimes, etc., etc.,
real crimes all, never resulted in indictments of responsible administration
figures, except for Manning who was indicted for blowing the whistle on crimes.
In Washington’s justice, it is not those who commit crimes who are indicted. It
is those who expose crimes.
Let’s start with the fake case of Trump’s retention of
some national security documents. Presidents and presidential
appointees are allowed copies of their work in office. Among the many boxes of
documents packed up for Trump there were allegedly 31 classified documents. On
the basis of these few pages a nonentity named Jack Smith, a total failure as
head of the Justice Department’s “Integrity Unit,” managed to create out of
thin air 37 felony counts against Trump. Not a single one of these charges has
any basis in law. No one has ever been charged under these phony charges.
Moreover, President Trump had the authority to declassify documents, which he
says he did.
But the Democrats know they own the media, and the law
schools, and the governing class that defines what is acceptable. For these
corrupt people, getting rid of Trump is all that matters. Every lie that serves
the cause of removing a threat to the corrupt establishment is permissible.
The 37 felony charges contain no evidence that Trump knew
what was in the boxes, assuming anything was. It is just an assertion. After
the boxes were seized, anything could have been put into them. Why would
anyone believe the FBI after so many FBI lies and scandals have been revealed?
In 2012 Judicial Watch sued to force President Bill Clinton
to turn over records in his possession, but Obama appointee judge Amy Berman
Jackson said the court had no ability to second-guess a president’s assertion
of documents to which he was entitled. The judge said that “since
the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal
of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for
this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority
to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records.”
But Jack Smith has brought a felony case based on nothing
but Jack Smith’s assertion that he, not President Trump or a federal judge,
knows what documents the President has a right to retain. As for integrity,
Jack Smith scores zero. From
a headline story this morning:
“Special counsel Jack
Smith’s team made a startling admission in its case against former President
Donald Trump, acknowledging in a new court filing that it failed to turn over
all evidence to Mr. Trump’s legal team as required by law and falsely claimed
that it had.”
In other words, Jack Smith lies, so why believe his case?
If I understand the nonsensical case, one of Jack Smith
charges is that Trump violated the law by letting a lawyer lacking the security
clearances search the document boxes for the alleged “contraband.”
So much for the charge of national security breaches.
It is total nonsense.
Jack Smith’s other fake case is that by challenging the
stolen election, President Trump while still President of the United States
Trump was involved in a conspiracy to “impair, object, and defeat the counting
of votes.”
Think about this charge. The charge is not that Trump
defeated the vote count, which he obviously didn’t as he was replaced by Biden
but that he challenged the vote count. Do you see what this means? If a
candidate challenges vote irregularities, and there were many in the stolen
election, he is guilty of “conspiracy to overturn the election.”
The alleged January 6 “insurrection” was the work of federal
agents at the capital while Trump and his supporters were more than a mile away
at the Washington Monument where Trump was speaking. Only a thoroughly
corrupt Department of Justice (sic) could configure an insurrection out of
police escorting a few unarmed people around the Capitol. The evidence
is clear that the federal agents and the police provoked the few protesters
present in an effort to create a violent scene for the presstitute media to
turn into an “insurrection.”
A black Atlanta prosecutor, Fanni Willis, has turned
President Trump’s request to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger to
investigate the widespread evidence of electoral fraud that cost Trump the
state’s electoral votes by a mere 11,000 votes. Only an ignorant quota hire
could possibly confuse a crime with a request for an honest vote count.
Some people think that Raffensperger and the Governor took
bribes to use the Dominion voting machines that experts say are easily hackable
and easily programed to count votes differently from how they are cast. The
suspicion is that the Georgia Republican authorities could not investigate
without risk that their bribe would surface.
Alvin Bragg, another quota hire serving as a New York
prosecutor, has charged Trump with 34 felonies for paying extortion money to
porn actress Stormy Daniels. The charge is that Trump’s lawyers reported the
payment as a legal expense when it should have been reported as a campaign
expense. The charge is not that Trump paid the porn star but that the
payment was incorrectly reported, which is merely the opinion of the
prosecutor.
Ask yourself, how can 34 felony charges come out of a
dispute over how a payment is reported?
The reason the Democrat hatchet men turn single
charges into 34 charges and 37 charges, is to create in the public’s mind that
Trump has committed a massive number of crimes. He must be guilty of something,
because “where there is smoke, there is fire.” In the American system in
which the media are totally biased against Trump, it is easy for Democrat
prosecutors to create smoke.
These indictments of Trump consist entirely of smoke.
That such spurious charges can go forward constitutes proof that in the
US law has been weaponized. Just like the dollar. Just like the
news.
Many people dislike Trump for personal reasons or because
the media has succeeded in indoctrinating them against Trump, but once innocence
or guilt depends on personal emotions, the rule of law is dead. And that
is precisely what the Trump indictments indicate.
The metaverse is an emerging technological concept
centred around virtual and augmented reality.Lurking beneath
this alluring veneer is a dark underbelly – it has the ominous capability to
become a breeding ground for censorship, unbridled surveillance, and an
insidious form of digital enslavement, surpassing anything humanity has ever
encountered. And, the World Economic Forum is taking steps to have control over
it.
The metaverse is an emerging technological concept centred
around virtual and augmented reality. It tantalisingly offers humans the
prospect of an unprecedented digital escapade – one that boasts greater
expanse, interactivity, and intensity than any prior experience.
However, lurking beneath this alluring veneer is a dark
underbelly. The metaverse has the ominous capability to become a breeding
ground for censorship, unbridled surveillance, and an insidious form of digital
enslavement, surpassing anything humanity has ever encountered.
If people increasingly immerse themselves in the metaverse,
integrating it into every facet of their lives, they inadvertently open
themselves up to manipulation by those who wield technological control. This
potential dependency raises the spectre of a dystopian scenario where the very
virtual realm designed to liberate morphs into a digital prison, with its
inhabitants confined and subjugated.
This technology is still in its early stages of development,
and its potential to either enhance digital opportunities or devolve into a
digital catastrophe remains uncertain.
Interestingly, the World Economic Forum (“WEF”), a prominent
international organisation known for its advocacy of digital censorship and
surveillance, is already taking steps to assert its control over this emerging
digital frontier.
Klaus Schwab, the founder and chairman of the WEF,
succinctly conveyed the organisation’s ambitions for the metaverse during a
speech in February 2023 at the appropriately titled World Government Summit. In
his address, Schwab proclaimed that those who gain mastery over new
technologies, including the metaverse, will wield a significant degree of
influence over the world’s affairs.
“We are at the beginning, when
you look at it, at technology transformation, it usually takes place in the
terms of an S-curve. And we are just now where we move into the exponential
phase. And I agree, artificial intelligence, but not only artificial
intelligence, but also the metaverse, new space technologies, and I could go on
and on, synthetic biology. Our life in 10 years from now will be completely
different, very much affected, and who masters those technologies, in some way,
will be the master of the world.”—Klaus Schwab.
Schwab and his organisation are employing a recognisable
strategy to assert their dominance over the metaverse.
They engage in collaborative efforts with both the public
and private sectors, orchestrating initiatives that further the WEF’s agenda.
This subtle manoeuvring enables them to progressively amass control and wield
influence.
At the forefront of the WEF’s metaverse endeavours lies
their primary initiative, aptly named ‘Defining
and Building the Metaverse’. Initially, the organisation
made no attempt to conceal its intentions of leveraging these partnerships to
establish a form of governance over the metaverse.
A previous iteration of the initiative’s webpage stated its
mission as, “to formulate and disseminate actionable strategies for the
creation and governance of the metaverse.”
This language has subsequently been substituted with a more
subdued mission, which now aims to “facilitate the progress of a secure,
interoperable, and economically feasible metaverse.”
The initiative has already forged partnerships with over 150
prominent entities, encompassing corporate giants, government bodies, and
international organisations.
Among these partners are Meta, Microsoft, Sony, HTC, and
Magic Leap, which stand as key manufacturers of virtual and augmented reality
hardware essential for metaverse interaction. Notably, both Meta and Microsoft
staunchly advocate for online censorship.
Furthermore, a number of private sector factions and
government representatives associated with censorship have also become
involved.
Moreover, a number of influential financial institutions
hold membership in this initiative.
Among these notable entities is Mastercard, an advocate
of digital
identification systems, which has actively participated in the New York
Fed’s pilot program for central bank digital currency. The company has also
imposed blacklists on various alternative tech platforms.
Another participant is PayPal, a corporation that has
de-platformed numerous users and lent its assistance to the Bank of England’s
endeavours concerning central bank digital currency.
The colossal financial institution JP Morgan, recognised for
its involvement in Singapore’s CBDC and its enthusiasm for biometric payment
methods, has similarly engaged in this initiative. JP Morgan has also
undertaken de-platforming actions against its customers.
Deutsche Bank, foreseeing the inevitability of central bank
digital currencies, has also aligned itself as a partner within the WEF
Metaverse initiative.
In alignment with the WEF’s customary approach, governmental
agencies and international organisations form an integral part of the
collaborative landscape.
This particular category of partners encompasses the United
Nations Office of Counterterrorism, the United States National Institutes of
Health National Human Genome Research Institute, and Interpol.
It’s pertinent to note that the United Nations has
consistently issued calls for censorship, displaying a stance contrary to the
principles of free speech.
The National Institute of Health has faced allegations of
attempting to stifle dissent during the covid pandemic, and Interpol’s global
arrest warrant mechanism has been misused to target journalists.
While these affiliations serve as telling indicators of the
WEF’s intentions for the Metaverse, the revelations within the reports
published by the Defining and Building the Metaverse initiative are even more
illuminating.
Within these reports, the WEF openly acknowledges its
aspirations to exercise control and impose restrictions on broad domains of
legal conduct and speech within the Metaverse. It aims to introduce digital
identification systems and advance the notions of diversity, equity, and
inclusion, a term often used to coerce users into complying with various
mandates and speech regulations, while simultaneously censoring dissenting
voices.
A particular report, titled ‘Privacy
and Safety in the Metaverse’, meticulously outlines the
WEF’s strategy for overseeing what it terms as “harms” – instances of perceived
wrongs that may not necessarily amount to criminal activity but are deemed
objectionable by others.
The report advocates for Metaverse stakeholders to
proactively combat cyberbullying, harassment, misinformation, and
disinformation – four terms frequently invoked to rationalise the censorship
practices of major tech companies.
The suggested approach for this crackdown involves the
establishment of a mechanism for “recourse and redress,” enabling users to
promptly report instances of harassment, discrimination, or abuse in real time.
This framework also incorporates robust investigation and enforcement
procedures capable of holding both individuals and organisations accountable
for their conduct, along with a tiered system of sanctions.
The report distinctly indicates that within the framework of
recourse and redress, the protection of free speech will be accorded a lower
priority. It goes so far as to quote a source expressing difficulty in
countering perceived toxic elements due to, in their words, “freedom of speech
concerns” and a scarcity of legally chargeable offences.
These legislations encompass the Children’s Online Privacy
Protection Act, which has negatively impacted numerous independent creators;
the California Age-Appropriate Design Code, which seeks to compel apps and
websites to verify visitors’ identities; the European Union’s Digital Services
Act, a comprehensive censorship law; and the UK’s online safety bill, replete
with provisions that pose threats to free speech and privacy.
Another report emanating from the WEF’s Metaverse
Initiative, titled ‘Social
Implications of the Metaverse’, unveils the
organisation’s desire for significantly more stringent controls over avatar
customisation within the Metaverse compared to the prevailing gaming domain.
While several popular video games permit players to opt for
or craft avatars possessing different genders or races, this report asserts
potential repercussions arising from users adopting avatars that differ from
their own race or culture. These potential repercussions, as outlined in the
report, encompass “cultural appropriation,” “identity tourism,” “digital
blackface,” harmful stereotypes, and misrepresentations.
The report employs these instances of perceived avatar
misuse as the rationale for enforcing constraints on avatar customisation and
advocates for the implementation of moderation policies.
Furthermore, the report emphasises the importance of
regulators giving careful consideration to “the provision of digital identities
in the Metaverse,” while advocating for the establishment of “an ecosystem of
trusted digital identity issuers.”
Despite recommending privacy-centric digital IDs, the
mandatory adoption of digital IDs within the Metaverse introduces a range of
inherent drawbacks for users. Digital IDs can foster exclusion, rendering
individuals without one unable to access specific Metaverse experiences.
Although the concept of “privacy-preserving” holds appeal in
theory, many systems claiming such attributes still inadvertently disclose
certain personal information.
At the very least, a network of trusted digital identity
providers suggests that these entities will hold personal user data.
Furthermore, the ‘Social Implications of the Metaverse’
report asserts the imperative of prioritising diversity, equity, and inclusion
at multiple levels while constructing Metaverse teams and crafting Metaverse
hardware, software, and encounters.
While diversity, equity, and inclusion are often framed as
principles promoting fairness and openness, such initiatives frequently devolve
into situations where corporations impose arbitrary quotas across their
operations and vehemently silence any dissenting voices criticising these
mandates.
Not only is the WEF promoting a bleak vision of the
Metaverse characterised by stringent control over speech and behaviour,
mandatory digital identification, and the enforcement of DEI (Diversity,
Equity, and Inclusion) mandates, but it has also birthed its own Metaverse
known as the ‘Global
Collaboration Village’. This endeavour is a collaborative venture
involving Accenture and Microsoft.
The Global Collaboration Village is framed as an “inclusive
and responsible” initiative, with its primary goal being the enhancement of
sustained public-private cooperation and the reinforcement of global
collaboration.
Partners contributing to this initiative include Infosys, a
company co-founded by the architect behind India’s digital ID system, and closely tied
to the puppet that currently serves as the UK’s prime minister; the
International Monetary Fund, actively engaged in developing a global Central
Bank Digital Currency (“CBDC”) platform and supporting CBDCs’ potential to
control people’s purchasing habits; the United Nations Development Program;
non-governmental organisations; academic institutions; various countries; and
even Interpol.
While the notion of the WEF assuming control over the
Metaverse is unsettling, the situation becomes even more disconcerting when one
realises that the organisation envisions the Metaverse permeating numerous
crucial sectors of society.
The WEF’s outlook encompasses a plethora of domains in which
the Metaverse is projected to intersect, including banking and capital markets,
corporate governance, financial and monetary systems, the future of
consumption, global governance, health and healthcare, internet governance,
justice and law, mental health, pandemic preparedness and response, and the
digital transformation of business.
Despite its aspirations to govern the Metaverse, the WEF
fundamentally diverges from democratically elected governments. Schwab, along
with his benefactors and the constituents of the WEF, hold positions that are
not subject to election or the possibility of being voted out by the public.
Furthermore, ordinary citizens find themselves devoid of
influence over the regulations that the WEF intends to impose upon the
Metaverse, resulting in the suppression of voices advocating for freedom.
Instead, the influential entities and individuals within the
WEF’s membership sphere are advocating for a digital future rife with
authoritarianism, where unwelcome speech is silenced and a universal digital
identification system is imposed.
Should the WEF’s vision materialise – an extensively
controlled Metaverse permeating nearly every facet of society – the unelected
WEF would bring to fruition the prophecy outlined by Schwab in his 2022
discourse on world governance: the WEF, in some manner, would wield mastery
over the world through its role in governing the Metaverse.
About the Author
A Lily Bit is a Substack page authored by Lily who is
dedicated to providing her readers with valuable insights into The Great Reset
and the World Economic Forum. She is committed to providing accurate and
thought-provoking content on this topic and believes that understanding The
Great Reset and the World Economic Forum is essential to making informed
decisions about our future. You can subscribe to and follow her Substack
page HERE.
