DONATE

Showing posts with label Infiltration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Infiltration. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

4 Stages of Islamic Conquest



Every once in awhile a post on a Facebook group or Google+ group catches my attention and I file it back for future consideration to share on my blogs. One such post I discovered on one of the many Counterjihad groups I am a member of that was posted by Karen Czarnowsky on 12/17/15. The thing I failed to post the appropriate Facebook group she posted in and I just hastily copy and pasted from the Facebook Counterjihad page that Karen posted on. Fortunately Karen posted the link to where she discovered the info I am about to share on my blog. I write all this because I like to give a blog pedigree from where I share from and frankly Karen’s post isn’t formated in the same way as the original source which is what I will use here for Counterjihad educational purposes.


The blog I am sharing from is called Civilus Defendus which is derived from Latin. The translation is Civil Defender - I like that. The name of the post is “4 Stages of Islamic Conquest.” The Civilus Defendus post Karen linked to appears undated with the comments indicating a December 2015 posting. Thanks to Google and the Civilus Defendus archives there is another almost exact version posted on January 10, 2010.


The Civilus Defendus post shows the agenda for the global spread of Islam by deception initially culminating with down right violent conquest. For those of you who like to be educated with visual stimulus I’ll post the nine minute Vimeo video (blog format willing) after the Civilus Defendus text.


JRH 3/2/16
********************


By Civilus Defendus (video, pdf)


STAGE 1: INFILTRATION


Muslims begin moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, though often subtle.


  • First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.


  • Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.


  • Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).


  • High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.


  • Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.


  • Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.


  • Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.


  • Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.


How many nations are suffering from Islamic infiltration? One? A handful? Nearly every nation? The Islamic ‘leadership” of the Muslim Brotherhood and others wish to dissolve each nation’s sovereignty and replace it with the global imposition of Islamic sharia law. Sharia law, based on the koran, sira and hadith, condemns liberty and forbids equality and is inconsistent with the laws of all Western nations. As the author and historian Serge Trifkovic states:


The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.


STAGE 2:   CONSOLIDATION OF POWER


Muslim immigrants and host country converts continue demands for accommodation in employment, education, social services, financing and courts.


  • Proselytizing increases; Establishment and Recruitment of Jihadi cells.


  • Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population to Islam.


  • Revisionist efforts to Islamize history.


  • Efforts to destroy historic evidence that reveal true Islamism.


  • Increased anti-western propaganda and psychological warfare.


  • Efforts to recruit allies who share similar goals (communists, anarchists).


  • Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint.


  • Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslims.


  • Efforts to introduce blasphemy and hate laws in order to silence critics.


  • Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim births and immigration.


  • Use of charities to recruit supporters and fund jihad.


  • Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of host society from within.


  • Development of Muslim political base in non-Muslim host society.


  • Islamic Financial networks fund political growth, acquisition of land.


  • Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition.


  • Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes.


  • Greater demands to adopt strict Islamic conduct.


  • Clandestine amassing of weapons and explosives in hidden locations.


  • Overt disregard/rejection of non-Muslim society’s legal system, culture.


  • Efforts to undermine and destroy power base of non-Muslim religions including and especially Jews and Christians.


Is there a pattern here? Theo van Gogh is murdered in the Netherlands for ‘insulting’ Islam; the Organization of the Islamic Conference demands ‘anti-blasphemy’ laws through the United Nations; France is set afire regularly by ‘youths’ (read Muslims); the rise of (dis-) honor killings…holocaust denial…anti-Semitism…deception re the tenets of Islam; hatred toward Christians and Jews and Hindus and Buddhists.  The pattern for all to see is the rise of Islamic intolerance and the covert/cultural jihad to remake host societies into sharia-compliant worlds – to remove host sovereignty and replace it with Islamic sharia law.  Sharia law that condemns earthly liberty and individual freedom, that forbids equality among faiths and between the sexes, that rejects the concept of nations outside the global house of Islam, that of dar al-Islam.


STAGE 3: OPEN WAR w/ LEADERSHIP & CULTURE


Open violence to impose Sharia law and associated cultural restrictions; rejection of host government, subjugation of other religions and customs.


  • Intentional efforts to undermine the host government & culture.


  • Acts of barbarity to intimidate citizens and foster fear and submission.


  • Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society.


  • All opposition is challenged and either eradicated or silenced.


  • Mass execution of non-Muslims.


  • Widespread ethnic cleansing by Islamic militias.


  • Rejection and defiance of host society secular laws or culture.


  • Murder of “moderate” Muslim intellectuals who don’t support Islamization.


  • Destruction of churches, synagogues and other non-Muslim institutions.


  • Women are restricted further in accordance with Sharia law.


  • Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, bombings.


  • Toppling of government and usurpation of political power.


  • Imposition of Sharia law


The website www.thereligionofpeace.com keeps track of the number of violent jihad attacks as best it can. The site lists more than 14,000 attacks since September 2001. It is worth a visit. What is occurring, however, that is likely inestimable are events where muslims are bullied by other muslims for not being “muslim enough,” where non-Muslims are intimidated into doing or not doing what they desire, where remnant populations are in a death spiral simply for being non-muslim in a predominantly muslim area. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists Animists and Atheists meet with death, property destruction or confiscation, forced conversion, rape, excessive taxation (the jizya), enslavement, riotous mobs and various other forms of islam (in-) justice at the hands of muslims in Sudan, Philippines, Kenya, Malaysia, India, etc.  And let us not forget ‘death to Apostates’ the world over.


STAGE 4: Totalitarian ISLAMIC “THEOCRACY”


  • Islam becomes the only religious-political-judicial-cultural ideology.


  • Sharia becomes the “law of the land.


  • All non-Islamic human rights cancelled.


  • Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim population.


  • Freedom of speech and the press eradicated.


  • All religions other than Islam are forbidden and destroyed.


  • Destruction of all evidence of non-Muslim culture, populations and symbols in country (Buddhas, houses of worship, art, etc).


The House of Islam (“peace”), dar al-Islam, includes those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule, to the soul crushing, liberty-condemning, discriminatory law of Sharia. The rest of the world in in the House of War, dar al-harb, because it does not submit to Sharia, and exists in a state of rebellion or war with the will of ‘Allah.’ No non-Muslim state or its citizens are “innocent,” and remain viable targets of war for not believing in ‘Allah.’ The Christian, Jewish, Coptic, Hindu and Zoroastrian peoples of world have suffered under subjugation for centuries. The Dhimmi-esque are forbidden to construct houses of worship or repair existing ones, economically crippled by the heavy jizya (tax), socially humiliated, legally discriminated against, criminally targeted and generally kept in a permanent state of weakness, fear and vulnerability by Islamic governments.


It should be noted that forced conversions (Egypt) and slavery (Sudan) are still reported. Homosexuals have been hung in the public square in Iran. Young girls are married to old men. Apostates are threatened with death. “Honor” killings are routine. Women are legally second-class citizens, though Muslim males insist they are “treated better” than in the West. These more obvious manifestations may distract from some less obvious ones such as the lack of intellectual inquiry in science, narrow scope of writing, all but non-existent art and music, sexual use and abuse of youth and women, and the disregard for personal fulfillment, joy and wonder. Look into the eyes of a recently married 12 year old girl to see the consequence of the moral deprivation spawned by Islam.


The 4 Stages of Islamic Conquest is also available in pdf format for easy sharing as part of “Liberty vs Sharia” (Click, save, share. Attribution appreciated.)


+++
2013




Stage 1: Infiltration


Stage 2: Consolidation of Power


Stage 3: Open War with Leadership and Culture


Stage 4: Totalitarian Islamic "Theocracy"
____________________


Thursday, January 3, 2013

Who subverted tea-party movement?

Drink Tea Not Koolaide
I don’t know about you but I thought Election 2012 reeked of the Republican Establishment screwing Conservative causes in favor of a status quo political correctness. Because of the GOP leadership I have decided not to be a Republican anymore. Joseph Farah has written an editorial that the Establishment within the GOP did its utmost to subvert the Tea Party Movement. Farah singles out former Congressman Dick Armey (pro-Dick and anti-Dick) as the subverter-in-chief working within the Tea Party organization Freedom Works.
 
If Dick Armey is a symptom of undermining the Tea Party Movement under the inspiration of the Republican Establishment then it is time to ditch the GOP and form another political party under Conservative leadership.
 
JRH 1/3/13
 
****************************************
Who subverted tea-party movement?
Exclusive: Joseph Farah notes accuracy of his 2010 prediction about Dick Armey
 

By Joseph Farah

January 1, 2013

WND

 
It gives me no solace or comfort or even pride to see my worst political prognostications come to fruition.
 
 
Recently, of course, you’ve probably heard or read the news that Dick Armey was purged by his organization FreedomWorks, which apparently learned the truth too late or couldn’t see how the group’s own leader was responsible for destroying the effectiveness and focus of the most powerful and important conservative political movement since Ronald Reagan’s campaign in 1980.
 
The full story of what Armey was up to in 2010 and the destructiveness of what he wrought on the tea-party movement is now out there for all to see. The truth is the whole situation was even worse than I could have foreseen and the $8 million payoff Armey got to leave FreedomWorks.
 
Last month, two FreedomWorks board members and allies of Armey sent Matt Kibbe, the president of the organization, a letter telling him they had received “allegations of wrongdoing by the organization or its employees.” They told Kibbe the board had retained attorneys to conduct an independent investigation of the allegations and ordered Kibbe, previously booted off the board, to cooperate and ensure no records were “destroyed, deleted, modified or otherwise tampered with.”
 
Kibbe responded to the Dec. 12 letter with a blistering memo exposing, from his point of view, how Republican insiders attempted to take over FreedomWorks under Armey’s watch. Kibbe portrayed himself as the true tea-party champion and Armey as the leader of the Republican establishment shills and said that the investigation was payback for battling Armey.
 
“As it turns out, the fight for lower taxes, less government and more freedom is all well and good until it is Republicans – ‘old friends’ – that are the ones needing to be held to account,” Kibbe wrote. “It is our sense that the irresponsible acts of the so-called Trustees of FreedomWorks – Dick Armey, C. Boyden Gray, and James C. Burnley – on Sept. 4, and their continued hostile acts today, are all about retribution for our willingness to take a strictly nonpartisan approach to politics, our willingness to hold both Republicans and Democrats to the standards set out by our freedom philosophy and the clear limits on government power delineated in our U.S. Constitution.”
 
In his memo, Kibbe presents a strong case against Armey for his primary support of Republican establishment candidates over genuine tea-party candidates.
 
But Kibbe worked closely with Armey through all the intrigue and FreedomWorks’ clear efforts to control the tea-party movement. They even wrote a book together in 2010 called “Give Us Liberty,” a book that reflected their desire to see the tea-party movement limit itself to what I called in my competing book, “The Tea Party Manifesto,” materialistic issues. (Because this book is so important to understanding the issues behind the leadership grab of the tea-party movement by Washington insiders and the throwing of the 2012 election, I have arranged to make it available for only 99 cents plus shipping.)
 
For those who want only the quick-and-dirty version of what I saw coming in 2010, here it is:
 
Armey was at the forefront of an insidious plot to “rein in” the tea-party movement, to constrain it to exclusively economic grievances defined in ludicrously narrow terms. For instance, tea-party members always overwhelmingly want to see immigration laws enforced and the border secured. But Dick Armey and FreedomWorks insisted that tea-party activists who work with them avoid this issue like the plague.
 
What Armey did after the 2010 mid-term elections was seek to limit the tea-party’s activism, effectiveness and longevity – to cut the very heart and soul out of a movement he had nothing to do with starting. He was the proverbial politician who attempted to jump in front of the historic parade the tea-party movement represented. It was not his movement, and he had not earned the right to dictate the rules of engagement and assert leadership over it.
 
Armey and FreedomWorks claimed they wanted to build a “big tent” by limiting the tea-party movement’s agenda to purely and exclusively economic issues defined in the narrowest imaginable terms. This is what the country-club Republicans have been trying to do since the days of Nelson Rockefeller and through George Bush I and II.
 
It doesn’t work. You can’t build a big tent by excluding people and issues about which they are passionate. It is completely counterintuitive, and it has been proven wrong time and time again. Needless to say, it happened again in 2012.
 
And, of course, as I wrote in “The Tea Party Manifesto,” there’s a bigger problem than that.
 
If America has problems other than economic, how do you address them with a purely economic program?
 
Obviously, you can’t.
 
It is not too late for the tea-party movement to recognize the con job that has been played on them – and to return to the grass-roots effectiveness it experienced in 2010. In fact, it is a necessity if America is to survive as we have known it in the next four years.
 
I would like to see the tea-party movement address all of the problems besetting our country. I would like to see this movement have long legs. Rather than constrain the tea-party movement and keep it in a box, I want to throw gasoline on this brushfire that began in 2010 and see it rage across the country in the form of vigilant citizen activism that will clean up our political system and keep it clean – returning America to the rule of law and the will of the people and the formula that made it the world’s greatest experiment in liberty.
 
As I said, I have written much about this topic. I saw all this coming. I actually publicly called for dumping Dick Armey from the tea-party movement in November of 2010. While the political intrigue continues at FreedomWorks, it is essential for the tea-party activists across this country to familiarize themselves with big picture of how to save America from going off not only the fiscal cliff but the moral cliff as well.
 
Editor’s note: Below are the top 10 previous columns by Joseph Farah about Armey, FreedomWorks and the tea-party movement beginning even before the 2010 elections:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
______________________________
© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Muslim Brotherhood GBTV

Islamic experts discuss Muslim Brotherhood on Glen Beck TV.

JRH 8/14/12 (Hat Tip: ACT for America)
*****************************
08/03/12 15:37

 

Friday, August 3, 2012

SALEHA MAHMOOD ABEDIN

Hillary Clinton & Saleha S. Mahmood Abedin
I am on an update list for Discover The Networks (DTN). I received an update which is titled in the email as “What All the Fuss About”. The email August 1st email attributes the author as John Perazzo; however the link takes you to a profile of Huma Abedin’s mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin. DTN tracks the nefarious Leftists and Radical Muslims and their groups which makes DTN an excellent resource.

I am not surprised at all the Left Wing individuals and groups have come out against investigating any compromising links between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff and close advisor Huma Abedin; HOWEVER it is reprehensibly short sighted for any Republicans to criticize such an investigation (can you say McCain and Boehner?) of Huma Abedin.

Check out this profile of Saleha Mahmood Abedin and tell me a Huma investigation is silly.

JRH 8/3/12
***************************
SALEHA MAHMOOD ABEDIN


Born in 1940 in what is now Pakistan, Saleha Mahmood Abedin is the widow of the late Zyed Abedin, an Indian-born academic who taught at the prestigious King Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia during the early 1970s. In 1976 Saleha gave birth to a daughter, Huma Abedin, while she and her husband were living in the United States. The following year, Saleha earned a PhD in sociology from the University of Pennsylvania.

In 1978, the Abedin family relocated from Kalamazoo, Michigan to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This move took place when Abdullah Omar Naseef, then-vice president of Abdulaziz University,
recruited Zyed Abedin, who had been his colleague at the University earlier in the decade, to work for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank that Naseef was preparing to launch. Both Zyed and Saleha Abedin would serve as editorial-board members of IMMA's in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). It should be noted that Abdullah Omar Naseef was an Islamic extremist with a significant history of ties to al Qaeda; moreover, he became secretary-general of the Muslim World League (MWL), a fundamentalist group with links to Osama bin Laden, in 1983. In the 1990s, Saleha Abedin herself would serve as an official representative of MWL.

After her husband died in 1993, Saleha Abedin became the
director of IMMA; today she serves as editor-in-chief of its Journal.

In addition to her duties with IMMA, Abedin is a board
member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (IICDR), a Union of Good-affiliated organization that has long been banned in Israel because of its ties to the terrorist organization Hamas.

Abedin also
directs the Amman, Jordan-based International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC), a Muslim World League affiliate that identifies itself as part of the aforementioned IICDR. Abiding by a charter authored by Yusuf al-Qaradawi and several other leading Muslim Brotherhood members, IICWC advocates the implementation of strict Sharia Law and calls for the repeal of Egyptian statutes that currently ban female genital mutilation, child marriage, and marital rape. Because each of these practices find doctrinal support in Sharia, IICWC favors them.

Saleha Abedin
is an influential founding member of the Muslim Sisterhood, a pro-Sharia entity composed of the wives of some of the highest-ranking leaders in the Muslim Brotherhood. A report by the Egyptian opposition newspaper Al-Liwa Al-Arabi says that these women are recruited to: “smuggle secret documents”; “spread the Brotherhood’s ideology by infiltrating universities, schools and homes”; “fulfill the interests of the Brotherhood”; and “organiz[e] projects which will penetrate [the Brotherhood's] prohibited ideology into the decision-making in the West ... under the guise of 'general needs of women.'” One particularly noteworthy member of the Sisterhood is Nagla Ali Mahmoud, wife of Mohammed Morsi (the Islamist who was elected president of Egypt in June 2012).

Saleha Abedin is perhaps best-known for her efforts in editing and translating (into English) author Fatima Umar Naseef's 1999 book, Women in Islam: A Discourse in Rights and Obligations, which quotes
extensively from the writings of the eminent Muslim Brotherhood theorist Sayyid Qutb. Lauding Naseef as “a prominent Saudi scholar,” Abedin describes the book as “a comprehensive study of the rights and obligations of women in society from the Islamic perspective.” Specifically, the book asserts that all Muslim women must wear the hijab, or veil; that Sharia offers women “the only escape” possible from the tyranny of manmade laws that “enslave” them; that female genital mutilation is permissible; that stoning and lashing are appropriate punishments for adultery; that apostates should be executed for abandoning the Muslim faith; that those who kill apostates should not be subject to the death penalty; that women are not only permitted, but obliged, to participate in violent jihad; that social interaction between the sexes is forbidden; that women have no right to abstain from sex with their husbands; that a woman should not let anyone into her family's house unless approved by her husband; and that free speech should not be permitted if it does not “benefit” Islam.

In addition, Abedin is a
member of several interfaith organizations, including the Millennium World Peace Summit, the Vienna Round Table for Christian Muslim Dialogue, the Peace Council, the Parliament of World Religions, and the World Council of Muslims for Interfaith Relations. She founded Dar Al-Hekma College (in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia), and is a Professor of Sociology at the King Abdulaziz University Women’s College (also in Jeddah).

Saleha Abedin's daughter,
Huma Abedin, worked at IMMA for 12 years (1996-2008) and is closely affiliated with Hillary Rodham Clinton. Saleha's son, Hassan Abedin, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is an associate editor
of IMMA's Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.
_______________________________
Copyright 2003-2012: DiscoverTheNetworks.org